SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 issue2Materials characterization by analysis of force-distance curves: an introduction to nano-mechanical measures and experimentation for undergraduate studentsLa filosofía frente al objeto cuántico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de física E

Print version ISSN 1870-3542

Rev. mex. fís. E vol.63 n.2 México Jul./Dec. 2017

 

Education

Theoretical and experimental study of the normal modes in a coupled two-dimensional system

M.H. Giméneza 

J.C. Castro-Palaciob 

J.A. Gómez-Tejedorc 

L. Velazquezd 

J.A. Monsoriue 

aDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camì de Vera s/n, 46022, Valéncia, Spain.

bDepartment of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, UK.

cCentre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, CBIT, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain, and Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Valencia, Spain.

dDepartamento de Física, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.

eCentro de Tecnologías Físicas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camì de Vera s/n, 46022, València, Spain. e-mail: jmonsori@fis.upv.es


ABSTRACT

In this work, the normal modes of a two-dimensional oscillating system have been studied from a theoretical and experimental point of view. The normal frequencies predicted by the Hessian matrix for a coupled two-dimensional particle system are compared to those obtained for a real system consisting of two oscillating smartphones coupled one to the other by springs. Experiments are performed on an air table in order to largely reduce the friction forces. The oscillation data are captured by the acceleration sensor of the smartphones and exported to file for further analysis. The experimental frequencies compare reasonably well with the theoretical predictions, specifically, within 1.7% of discrepancy.

Keywords: Smartphones; physics teaching; normal nodes

PACS: 46.40.-f; 43.20.+g; 43.40.+s

1. Introduction

The study of the normal modes is a central issue in understanding the properties of solids and molecules, such as solid phonons and vibrations of polyatomic molecules 1-4. Therein, the formalism of the Hessian matrix is a common approach 1-3,5. Therefore, this topic is included in the courses of Physics and Chemistry degrees later in the syllabus. In this respect, for instance, the collective oscillations of a periodic solid, the phonons, which reveal important information, e.g. about thermal and electrical conductivity can be derived experimentally from neutron scattering. In the case of polyatomic molecules, normal modes are connected to the vibrational spectrum, which can be measured using a number of spectroscopic techniques. From a teaching point of view, the simplest classical model to characterize the vibrational modes of a polyatomic molecule can be a particle system coupled by pair potentials 6.

In general physics courses, the topic of coupled systems has been basically analyzed by means of linear 1D models 7. It is also possible to find a number of works in the literature on the experimental characterization of coupled 1D systems connected to external drivers 8, i.e. by using video-analysis techniques 9, electromechanical systems10 or sensors 11. However, when it comes to everyday life, most oscillations are more than one-dimensional. This is a good reason for including two-dimensional oscillation experiments in physics teaching 12,13.

Simple experiments involving oscillations are largely facilitated by introducing smartphones as oscillating bodies in one 14 and two dimensions 15. The acceleration sensor carried by these devices can be used to collect the oscillation data which can be exported to file for further analysis 16. This is a major advantage since the way of studying two-dimensional oscillations in previous work 12 was somewhat tedious. For example, the trajectory of an oscillating puck on an air table can be followed by the trace described by it onto paper, which is later digitalized to extract the information of the trajectory 12. The introduction of the smartphone acceleration sensor to measuring this kind of two dimensional oscillations represented a major progress in our previous work 15 where mechanical Lissajous figures were obtained in a very simple way.

In this work, we present an exhaustive theoretical and experimental study of the normal modes in a coupled 2D system. The experimental setup consists of two smartphones on an air table connected to each other by springs and to fixed ends. The air table allows us to largely reduce the friction forces. In these experiments the mobile phones themselves are the bodies under study. The coupled oscillations are captured with the acceleration sensors of the smartphones and the data are exported to file for ulterior analysis.

It should be pointed out that the smartphones are just measurement tools here. Its use is not the main contribution of this work. In fact, two-dimensional oscillations could be also analyzed by using other techniques, i.e. video analysis techniques 9,17. However we have preferred to use smartphones since they allow for a fast and direct acquisition of data. Based on the collected data, the normal modes in the 2D system of coupled oscillators can be deeply analyzed, which is the main objective of this work. The theoretical frequencies derived from this analysis based on the Hessian matrix are compared with those obtained from processing the smartphone sensor data. In this way, we provide an example of a physics teaching experiment on 2D coupled oscillations which contributes to further close the existing gap in the General Physics courses. In this simple way, students may be introduced to the vibrational properties of solids and molecules.

The outline of the paper is the following. In Sec. 2, the setup used to carry out the experiments is described. It consists basically of two smartphones as oscillating bodies and an air table. It follows, in Sec. 3, the description of the Hessian matrix formalism which is applied to a coupled two-dimensional particle system. The results and discussions on the experiments and the comparison with the theoretical model are included in Sec. 4. Finally, in Sec. 5, some conclusions are drawn.

2. Experimental setup

A photograph of the experimental setup used for obtaining the vibrational normal modes in a coupled 2D systems is shown in Fig. 1a. It consists of the air table, the air supplier, the springs, and two smartphones Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-I9100 bearing an Android version 4.03. The mass of the smartphones (plus the carrying tray) is m = (174.4 ± 0.1) g for both smartphones. As indicated in the figure, the lay out of the springs is a two-plus-signs geometry. The air table is a square each side measuring (0.464 ± 0.001) m. The force constant of the springs is k = (20.6 ± 0.1) N/m and its natural length is d = (0.058 ± 0.001) m. The remaining geometric parameters of the system are shown in Fig. 1b.

Figure 1 Photograph of the experimental setup. In panel a), a global view of the squared air table, the air supplier, the springs, and the smartphones are shown. The geometric parameters of the system at rest are shown in panel b). 

3. Hessian matrix formalism

First of all, the normal frequencies for the coupled system of Fig. 1 are calculated by a methodology based on the Hessian matrix formalism 5. This formalism was successfully used in previous work, for instance, to calculate the phonons of rare gas solids 1-3. In this respect, the total potential energy of the system can be calculated taking into account the geometric variables defined in Fig. 1b and the displacement vectors,

Δr1=r1-r1,0=(x1-x1,0,y1-y1,0),Δr2=r2-r2,0=(x2-x2,0,y2-y2,0), (1)

where r1,0=(x1,0,y1,0) and r2,0=(x2,0,y2,0) are the vector positions of the smartphones at the equilibrium positions, and r1=(x1,y1) and r2=(x2,y2) are the corresponding vector positions when the smartphones are in motion.

It should be noted that the springs stretch approximately three times their natural length. In this respect, we have made an independent experiment to check the linearity of the springs. In these conditions and considering the harmonic approximation, the total potential is given by,

U=k2i=17(di-d0)2, (2)

where the elongation of each spring, di, can be determined from the points represented in Fig. 1b and from the displacements in Eq. 1,

d1=|q1p1+Δr1|,d2=|q2p2+Δr1|,d3=|q3p3+Δr1|,d4=|q4p6+Δr2|,d5=|q5p7+Δr2|,d6=|q6p8+Δr2|,d7=|p4p5+Δr2-Δr1|. (3)

Here, d0 is the natural length of the spring. Thus, at rest (Δr1=Δr2=(0,0)), the seven springs are still elongated and the energy of the system represented by Eq. (2) is minimal but not zero.

Figure 2 Schematic representation of the normal modes. Arrows of the same color in each panel indicate the direction of a simultaneous movement of the smartphones. 

From Fig. 1, it appears that there are seven degrees of freedom in general, three for the center of mass of each smartphones and one for the rotation about the center of mass of the system. However, we have not considered rotations in our two-dimensional model consisting of two coupled particles. Under these conditions, and taking into account that oscillations take place on the x, y plane, we have a system with four degrees of freedom, namely, translations along x- and y- axes for each smartphone. The dynamical matrix (Hessian matrix) is then expressed as,

Diα,jβ=1m(2Uuiαujβ)|uiα=0;ujβ=0, (4)

where U is the total potential energy and uiα (ujβ) is the displacement of the i-th or j-th particle (i, j = 1,2) along the α or β axis (α, β = x, y). As a result, a two-dimensional matrix is obtained.

The evaluation of this matrix at the equilibrium positions and further diagonalization yields the four vibrational eigenfrequencies squared. These normal frequencies will be denoted as ωxS,ωyS,ωxA, and ωyA, corresponding to the symmetric and antisymmetric modes and for the x- and xYy- axes, respectively.

By using the potential energy expression, U = U(x 1 , y 1 , x 2 , y 2) given by Eq. (2), the above Hessian matrix, evaluated at the equilibrium positions is,

D=388.4930.000-118.1190.00.000341.2330.000-50.953-118.1190.000388.4930.0000.000-50.9530.000341.233rad/s2. (5)

The eigenvalue problem that has been solved can be stated as follows,

(D-λI)v=0 (6)

where D is the Hessian matrix, I the unitary matrix, v a non-zero vector (called “eigenvector") and λ = ω 2, the corresponding eigenvalue. The eigenvalues result from the diagonalization of the matrix, DλI.

The resulting normal modes (the square root of the eigenvalues) are, ωxS=16.443  rad/s, ωyS=17.038  rad/s, ωxA=22.508  rad/s, and ωyA=19.804  rad/srad/s. It should be noted that these values are only valid for small displacements about the equilibrium positions. It can also be noted that the eigenfrequencies obtained for the x-axis are significantly different from the ones from the 1D model, that is: (ωxA)2=3(ωxS)2. This is due to the effect of the vertical springs (p2q2, p3q3, p6q4 and p7q5) on the horizontal oscillations (for us, “horizontal" is when the oscillation is along the x-axis and “vertical" along the y-axis). In addition, and as expected, the eigenfrequencies along the y-axis also differ from the ones obtained for the x-axis. For instance, the symmetric mode along the y-axis is affected by the horizontal springs, namely, p1q1 and p8q6 (p4p5 does not stretch in this case), while the symmetric mode along the x-axis is affected by the four springs aforementioned. However, in the case of the antisymmetric mode along the y-axis, the horizontal spring p4p5 is affected.

It is also possible to perform a more exhaustive study of the normal modes of oscillation by using Newton’s Second Law. For example, as for the horizontal symmetric mode, the total potential given by Eq. (2) can be particularized as, Δr1=Δr2=(Δx,0) where ∆x = xx 0 is a synchronized displacement of both bodies along the x-axis direction. In this situation, the potential energy only depends on the global displacement ∆x. Taking into account that all involved forces are conservative, the net force acting on the system is, F=-U. For the particular case under consideration F(x) = −dU/dx. On the other hand, Newton’s Second Law can also be expressed as F(x) = m Total(d 2 x/dt 2), where m Total = 2m is the total mass of the system. Therefore, the resulting linear second-order differential equation governing the system is,

-dUdx=2md2xdt2. (7)

It should be pointed out that in Eq. 7, which governs the symmetric horizontal mode, elastic forces of both horizontal and vertical springs are present. The vertical springs stretch even when the particles move along the x axis only. Contrary to a simple 1D model of coupled oscillations, there is no analytical solution of Newton’s Second Law for the 2D case and so a numerical solution is required.

By using the function NDSolve of the software Mathematica 18, Eq. 7 can be solved numerically using ∆x 0 and dx/dt = 0 as initial conditions. NDSolve uses an LSODA approach, switching between a non-stiff Adams method and a stiff Gear backward differentiation formula method. For an initial displacement ∆x 0 = 0.02 m, the numerical solution of Eq. 7 provides the trajectory displayed in Fig. 3 (solid line). Additionally, the harmonic oscillation Δx(t)=Acos(ωxSt) with A = ∆x 0 is shown in the same figure (dashed line). It can therefore be seen that curves overlap visually.

Figure 3 Simultaneous displacement of the bodies along the x axis versus time. The curves of the numerical (exact) (yellow solid line) and harmonic (black dashed line) trajectories overlap visually. 

From Fig. 3, the exact period of oscillations can be determined, T = 0.3818 s, and from it the exact (from solving Eq. 7) value of the frequency, ω = 16.457 rad/s. The discrepancy between this value and the harmonic result (ωxS= 16.443) is only 0.09%. The small discrepancy be tween both results is due to the influence of the vertical springs. The horizontal projections of the forces exerted by these springs is linear only for small displacements. This study can be repeated for the antisymmetric mode by imposing Δr1=-Δr2 in the potential U.

A similar analysis for the symmetric and antisymmetric normal modes along the y-axis, and using 0.02 m as initial displacement, yields discrepancies between the harmonic and the exact frequencies within 1% in all cases. The smaller the initial displacement the smaller the discrepancy. For instance, discrepancies within 0.3% are obtained if 1 cm is used as initial displacement. The smaller the displacements the better the harmonic approximation approaches the physical experiment. Thereby, the Hessian matrix formalism constitutes a very good approximation for obtaining the normal frequencies of a coupled 2D system in basic Physics courses.

4. Results and discussions

In order to check the normal frequencies predicted from the Hessian matrix, experiments using the experimental setup of Fig. 1 are carried out. The oscillation data are captured by the acceleration sensor of the smartphones. From previous experiments, we already know that the acceleration sensor in our smartphone’s models is located at the center of the smartphone, which is coincident with the center of mass of the system 19. However, the position of the acceleration sensor may not be at the geometrical center for other models 20.

For the interaction with the mobile sensor, the free Android application “Accelerometer Toy ver 1.0.10" is used 21. This application takes 316 kB of SD card memory and can be downloaded from the Google play website. The values of the acceleration components on x, y and z-axes are registered at each time step. The precision in the measurement of the acceleration is δa = 0.03 m/s2 and of time is δt = 0.01 s. This application also allows to save the output data to file from which further analysis can be performed. Once the app. is downloaded to the mobile device, a small test can be done to ensure the device is working correctly. If the mobile is left undisturbed on a horizontal surface, the application output curves for the acceleration should indicate values very close to zero for all axes. This app. was successfully used in other experiments to study uniform and uniformly accelerated circular motions 19.

Five experiments are performed using the setup of Fig. 1. In the first four experiments, the system is set to oscillate by hand with approximately normal frequencies (symmetric and antisymmetric) along x- and y-axes, respectively. For the case of the symmetric mode, mobile phones are displaced about 1 cm towards the positive x-axis and towards the positive y- axis, respectively. For the antisymmetric mode, one of the mobile phones is displaced to the left and the other to the right for the x-axis, and downward and upward for the y-axis, respectively.

The data registered by the acceleration sensor of each smartphone for the symmetric and antisymmetric oscillations (see Fig. 3) can be fitted to a harmonic function, a(t) =Asin(ωt + φ) where A is the amplitude, ω the frequency and φ the phase. The fitting was carried out by using the non-linear fitting algorithm Levenberg-Marquardt 22,23. The results for the frequencies are registered in Table I. There are 8 cases in total, where four eigenfrequencies correspond to each smartphone, for the symmetric and anti-symmetric modes, respectively. The graphs of the acceleration measurements and the corresponding fit curve are included in Fig. 4 for each smartphone, normal mode and axis.

Table I Frequencies and uncertainties from the fit of the acceleration data to a(t) = Asin(ωt + φ) along x− and y−axes for the mobiles 1 and 2, respectively. 

Mobile 1 Mobile 2
ωxS (rad/s) 16.158±0.016 16.207±0.016
ωyS (rad/s) 16.854±0.013 16.732±0.010
ωxA (rad/s) 22.158±0.012 22.115±0.012
ωyA (rad/s) 19.988±0.017 19.860± 0.020

Figure 4 Symmetric and antisymmetric acceleration oscillations of the mobiles 1 and 2 along x−and y−axes respectively (open circles). The red solid lines indicate the fit. The square of the curvilinear correlation coefficient, R2, has been included on the upper right hand side of each graph. 

The analogue values to the frequencies of the smartphones for the symmetric and antisymmetric modes and for the x- and y-axes are shown in Table II. The corresponding normal frequencies obtained from the Hessian matrix formalism are also included. A very good agreement is obtained between the experimental and the theoretical results.

Table II Comparison between the experimental results (average values from Table I) and those obtained from the Hessian matrix formalism. 

Experimental
results
Hessian matrix
formalism
Discrepancies
(%)
ωxS (rad/s) 16.18 ± 0.03 16.443 1.6
ωyS (rad/s) 16.79 ± 0.02 17.038 1.5
ωxA (rad/s) 22.14 ± 0.02 22.508 1.7
ωyA (rad/s) 19.92 ± 0.04 19.804 0.6

Finally, in the fifth experiment, an arbitrary oscillation is started by just shifting one of the mobiles out of the equilibrium position. It consisted of a diagonal displacement of the left-hand side mobile while the other smartphone was held at the equilibrium position. Then, both mobiles were left free. In this case, the arbitrary oscillation (non-normal) of the studied system can be represented as a superposition of the corresponding four normal oscillations,

a(t)=AxSsin(ωxSt+ϕxS)+AxAsin(ωxAt+ϕxA)+AySsin(ωySt+ϕyS)+AyAsin(ωyAt+ϕyA). (8)

Figure 5 shows the data points for an arbitrary oscillation (with open circles). A window of 3 seconds has been extracted from the total time series. The fitting for Eq. 8 (solid line in Fig. 5) was carried out in the same manner as for the pure modes in Table I: that is to say by using the nonlinear fitting algorithm Levenberg-Marquardt 22,23.

Figure 5 Free oscillations of the smartphones (open circles). The red solid lines indicate the fit. 

In all cases shown in Fig. 5 the values of R 2 are around 0.99 which indicates the good quality of the fitting procedure. The corresponding fitted frequencies are not shown (for brevity), since they are very similar to those reported in Tables I and II. Alternatively, the main frequencies of the system can be also explored by using the Fourier transform of a free oscillation of acceleration data: our objective was rather to prove the validity of the Hessian matrix formalism in predicting the normal frequencies of a 2D coupled system. To connect basic and simple oscillation experiments like the one in this article with this formalism helps prepare the student’s mindset for physics courses further on in the syllabus.

5. Conclusions

The normal frequencies of a coupled two-dimensional system are studied both theoretically and experimentally. The normal modes were first calculated for a particle system from the Hessian matrix. An experimental setup using smartphones instead of particles and with real springs is used to test the theoretical model. The oscillation data were collected by the acceleration sensor of the smartphones. For all cases, the percentage discrepancies between the theoretical and experimental frequencies are within 1.7 %.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Institute of Educational Sciences of the Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain) for the support of the Teaching Innovation Groups MoMa and e-MACAF and for the financial support through the Project PIME 2015 B18. The authors would also like to thank Mrs Janet Anne Handcock for kindly revising the manuscript as a native English speaker.

REFERENCES

1. S. Jimenez, A. Pasquarello, R. Car and M. Chergui, Chem. Phys. 233 (1998) 343. [ Links ]

2. J.C. Castro-Palacios, L. Velázquez, G. Rojas-Lorenzo and J. Rubayo-Soneira, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 730 (2005) 255. [ Links ]

3. J.C. Castro-Palacio, L. Velázquez, A. Lombardi, V. Aquilanti and J. Rubayo-Soneira , J. Chem. Phys. 11126 (2007) 174701. [ Links ]

4. A. Lombardi et al., Phys. Scr. 80 (2009) 048103. [ Links ]

5. N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics 1st edition (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976). [ Links ]

6. E.B. Wilson Jr., J.C. Decius, P.C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra (New York: Dover, 1995). [ Links ]

7. R. Resnick, D. Halliday and K.S. Krane, Physics 4th edition (Mexico, DF: CECSA, 1999). [ Links ]

8. R. Givens, D.F. de Alcantara-Bonfim and R. B. Ormond, Am. J. Phys. 71 (2003) 87. [ Links ]

9. J.A. Monsoriu, M.H. Giménez, J. Riera and A. Vidaurre, Eur. J. Phys. 26 (2005) 1149. [ Links ]

10. J.E. Molina-Coronell and B.P. Rodríguez-Villanueva, Rev. Mex. Fis. E 61 (2015) 65. [ Links ]

11. J.C. Castro-Palacio , L. Velázquez-Abad, F. Giménez and J.A. Monsoriu, Eur. J. Phys. 34 (2013) 737. [ Links ]

12. N.C. Bobillo-Ares and J. Fernandez-Nunez, Eur. J. Phys. 16 (1995) 223. [ Links ]

13. J.S. Pérez-Huerta, C. Meneses-Fabián and G. Rodriguez-Zurita, Rev. Mex. Fis. E 55 (2009) 8. [ Links ]

14. J. Kuhn and P. Vogt, Phys. Teach. 50 (2012) 504. [ Links ]

15. L. Tuset-Sanchis, J.C. Castro-Palacio, J. A. Gómez-Tejedor, F.J. Manjón andJ.A. Monsoriu, Phys. Ed. 50 (2015) 580. [ Links ]

16. J.C. Castro-Palacio , L. Velázquez-Abad, M.H. Giménez andJ.A. Monsoriu, Am. J. Phys. 81 (2013) 472. [ Links ]

17. J. Riera , J.A. Monsoriu , M.H. Giménez, J.L. Hueso and J.R. Torregrosa, Am. J. Phys. 71 (2003) 1075. [ Links ]

18. Wolfram Research, Inc. (2010). Mathematica version 8.0. URL: http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/Links ]

19. J.C. Castro-Palacio , L. Velázquez, J.A. Gómez-Tejedor, F.J. Majón andJ.A. Monsoriu, Rev. Bras. Ensino Fís. 36 (2014) 2315. [ Links ]

20. S. Mau, F. Insulla, E.E. Pickens, Z. Ding and S.C. Dudley, Phys. Teach. 54 (2016) 246. [ Links ]

21. C. Pearson (2013). Accelerometer Toy (Version 1.0.10) [Mobile App.]. Downloaded from: https://play.google.com/store/appsLinks ]

22. K. Levenberg, Quart. Appl. Math 2 (1944) 164. [ Links ]

23. D. Marquardt, SIAM J. Appl Math. 11 (1963) 431. [ Links ]

Received: June 25, 2016; Accepted: January 23, 2017

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License