SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 issue4Opuntia setocarpa, a new species of nopal from Western MexicoParasitic nematodes of three species of wild carnivore mammals from Atlantic forest in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de biodiversidad

On-line version ISSN 2007-8706Print version ISSN 1870-3453

Rev. Mex. Biodiv. vol.88 n.4 México Dec. 2017

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.023 

Taxonomy and systematics

A new species of Neoechinorhynchus (Eoacanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) from the freshwater fish Ageneiosus inermis (Siluriformes) in the Brazilian Amazon

Una especie nueva de Neoechinorhynchus (Eoacanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) del pez dulceacuícola Ageneiosus inermis (Siluriformes) en el Amazonas brasileño

Daniel Brito-Portoa  * 

Amanda Karen Silva-de Souzaa 

José Celso de Oliveira-Maltaa 

a Laboratório de parasitologia de peixes do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Campus II, Av. André Araújo, 2936 -- Petrópolis, Manaus, AM 69067-375, Brazil


Abstract:

This work describes a new species of the genus Neoechinorhynchus, a parasite found in the Siluriformes fish, Ageneiosus inermis collected in Catalão Lake. This species is most closely related to N. (N.) pterodorides and N. (N.) pimelodis than other species registered in Brazil. The size of its trunk, hooks and male reproductive system distinguish it from these 2 species. This work contributes to increase the knowledge of the biodiversity of fish parasites in the Amazon.

Keywords: Fish parasite; Ageneiosus inermis; Solimões and Negro rivers; Catalão Lake; Amazon

Resumen:

En este trabajo se describe una nueva especie del género Neoechinorhynchus, un parásito del pez Ageneiosus inermis (Siluriformes), recolectado en el lago Catalão. Esta especie está más estrechamente relacionada con N. (N.) pterodorides y N. (N.) pimelodis que otras especies de Neoechinorhynchus registradas en Brasil. El tamaño del tronco, los ganchos y el sistema reproductor masculino son los caracteres que la distinguen de estas 2 especies. Este trabajo contribuye al conocimiento de la biodiversidad de los parásitos de los peces en el Amazonas.

Palabras clave: Parásito de peces; Ageneiosus inermis; Ríos Solimões y Negro; Lago Catalão; Amazonas

Introduction

The phylum Acanthocephala is a poorly known helminth group in Neotropical fishes. The composition of the known acanthocephalan fauna shows that the Neoechinorhychidae is the family most represented (Santos, Gibson, Tavares, & Luque, 2008). In Brazil few species are known from this genus. Of the 109 species described as belonging to the genus Neoechinorhynchus Stiles & Hassall, 1905, 7 are relegated to other genera, 14 are considered invalid, 11 belong to the subgenus Hebesoma, 48 belong to the subgenus Neoechinorhynchus and 29 are retained as valid but cannot be assigned to any subgenus (Amin, 2002).

In Brazil, only 7 species have been described thus far. This study describes a new species of Neoechinorhynchus a parasite of Ageneiosus inermis, collected from a floodplain lake in the Amazon.

Materials and methods

The fish were collected from the Catalão Lake, a fluvial-lacustrine system at the confluence of the Negro and Solimões rivers (03°10′04″ S, 59°54′45″ W) during the flood period in May 2015. The fish were necropsied in the field and their bodies were fixed, labeled and analyzed in the Laboratory of Fish Parasitology at the National Institute for Amazonian Research (INPA). The specimens were then fixed in 70% ethanol for processing. Worms stained in regressive staining techniques (Carmin alcoholic) according to Amato, Boeger, and Amato (1991), and cleared in immersion oil and mounted in Canada balsam. Drawings were made with the assistance of a lightfield Olympus BH-2 microscope. All measurements are in micrometers (μm). Ecological parameters follow Bush, Lafferty, Lotz, and Shostak (1997). Holotype and paratypes were deposited in the Non-insect Invertebrate Collection of the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia-INPA.

Description

Neoechinorhynchus (Neoechinorhynchus) inermis n. sp. (Figs. 13)

Figures 1–3 1, Neoechinorhynchus inermis sp. n., male; 2, proboscis; 3, thorn. 

General. With characters of the genus and subgenus Neoechinorhynchus. Elliptical or ovoid body, smooth and rough edges. Neck visible and well developed. Proboscis globular, with 18 hooks distributed in 3 rows of 6 hooks. Larger anterior hooks. Proboscis sheath with simple muscular layer. Central ganglion spherical and located in the proboscis sheath. 5 giant nuclei present on the dorsal side of the amebiform's trunk and 1 on the ventral side. Lemnisci of different sizes. Lacunar system with main channels situated on dorsal and ventral sides (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison between Neoechinorhyncus inermis n. sp. and other species of Neoechinorhynchus. All measurements are in micrometers. AH = anterior hook, middle hook or posterior hook; Lt = length trunck, Gc = cement gland, Si = site of infection. 

Especies/host AH, MH, PH Ct (trunk) Gc SI Distribution
N. (N.) inermis/Ageneiosus inermis
 Male 124.2, 54, 4 1,556 243 Upper intestine Amazonas
 Female No date
N. (N.) veropesoi/Plagiosciom squamosissimus
 Male 67.9, 22.2, 12 2,800 203.6 Small intestine Pará – Guajará Bay
 Female 87.1, 25.5, 13.8 5,870
N. (N.) pterodoridis/Pterodoras granulosus
 Male 143, 45, 10 2,250 336 Intestine Amazonas
 Female 139, 39, 12 2,700
N. (N.) pimelodi/Pimelodus maculatus
 Male 105, 36, 23 1,450 162 Anterior intestine Mato Grosso – São Francisco River
 Female 129, 47, 29 2,440

Male: measurements based on 2 male specimens. Trunk length 1.836–1.296 (1,556 ± 381.4) and width 540. Conical neck length 99–68.4 (83.7 ± 21.9) and width 82.8–54 (68.1 ± 19.9). Proboscis length 126–99 (112.5 ± 19) and width 108–79.2 (93 ± 20). Lemniscus uninucleate length 490–210 (350 ± 198) and width 140–105 (122.5 ± 24.7) and binucleate with saccule format length 301–140 (220 ± 113) and width 105–98 (101.5 ± 4.9). Giant amoeboid nuclei, 5 dorsal and 1 or 2 ventral. Anterior hooks (the largest) length 133–116.2 (124.5 ± 12) and width 14–10.5 (12.2 ± 2.8), middle hooks length 79.4–29.4 (54 ± 35.4) and width 5.1–3.4 (4 ± 1.4) and posterior hooks 26.6–23.1 (24.8 ± 2.1) and width 2.1. Proboscis receptacle length 414–288 (351 ± 89.1) and width 324–198 (261 ± 89.1). Anterior testis length 246.6–198 (222.3 ± 33.9) and width 216–180 (198 ± 25.5). Posterior testis length 133.2–270 (201.6 ± 96.9) and width 97.2–127 (112.1 ± 21.2). Cement gland length 198–288 (243 ± 63.6) and width 369–180 (270 ± 127.3). Ovoid shaped cement reservoir length 270–180 (225 ± 63.6) and width 118.8–108 (113 ± 7.1). Saefftigen's elongated pouch length 504–396 (450 ± 76.4) and width 127.8–126 (126 ± 0.7). Male reproductive system occupies 71–75% of the body length.

Female: it was not found.

Taxonomic summary

Type host: A. inermis (Linneus, 1766) Auchenipteridae, common name: Mandubé.

Type locality: Catalão Lake (03°10′04″ S, 59°54′45″ W); the confluence of the Negro and Solimões rivers near Manaus city.

Specimens deposited: holotype INPA-17: non-insect Invertebrate Collection INPA; Paratipes INPA-18.

Site of infestation: upper intestine.

Prevalence: 55; mean intensity: 5.6; mean abundance: 3.1.

Etymology: its name is derived from the host's name.

Remarks

In Brazil, 7 species of Neoechinorhynchus (N.) have been registered: N. (N.) buttnerae Golvan, 1956; N. (N.) curemai Noronha, 1973; N. (N.) macronucleatus Machado Filho, 1954; N. (N.) paraguayensis Machado Filho, 1959; N. (N.) pimelodiBrasil-Sato & Pavanelli, 1998; N. (N.) pterodoridisThatcher, 1981 and N. (N.) veropesoi Melo et al., 2015 (Amin, 2002, Santos et al., 2008, Thatcher, 2006).

N. (N.) buttnerae; N. (N.) pterodoridis; N. (N.) veropesoi, and N. (N) curemai have been registered in the Amazon region (Martins et al., 2000, Noronha, 1984, Santos et al., 2008, Thatcher, 2006).

Thatcher (1981) outlines the characteristics that distinguish N. pterodoridis from other species: (1) neck long and visible, (2) anterior, middle and posterior circles of hooks larger than in other species. This species was compared with N. paraguayensis and N. golvaniSalgado-Maldonado, 1978.

Brasil-Sato and Pavanelli (1998) distinguish N. pimelodis from the 8 species of Acanthocephala registered in Brazil: N. (N.) buttnerae, N. (N.) curemai, N. (N.) macronucleatus, N. (N.) paraguayensis, N. (N.) pimelodi, N. (N.) pterodoridis, N. (N.) golvaniSalgado-Maldonado, 1978, and N. (N.) villoldoi Vizcain, 1992. N. pimelodis is shown to be most closely related to N. (N.) pterodoridisThatcher, 1981. Of the species that occur in Brazil, this new species described here is most similar to N. (N.) pterodoridis and N. (N.) pimelodis.

N. (N.) inermes sp. n. shows most similarity to N. (N.) pterodoridis collected from the Amazonas River (Thatcher, 1981) and N. (N.) pimelodis collected from the São Francisco River (Brasil-Sato & Pavanelli, 1998). It is distinguished from N. (N.) pterodoridis with smaller trunk length, and from N. (N.) pimelodis with greater trunk length.

The proboscis of N. (N.) inermes sp. n. is smaller than that of N. (N.) pterodoridis and approximately the same size as that of N. (N.) pimelodis. Its neck is much smaller than the necks of both other species. The lemnisci are also much smaller. The male reproductive system occupies 75% of its cavity which is larger than in both N. (N.) pterodorides (73%) and N. (N.) pimelodi (50.73%).

The anterior and medium hooks of N. (N.) inermes sp. n. are smaller than those of N. (N.) pterodoridis and larger than those of N. (N.) pimelodis. The posterior hooks are of similar size as N. (N.) pimelodis. Anterior testis is smaller compared to the other species and the posterior testis is smaller than that of N. (N.) pterodoridis and larger than that of N. (N.) pimelodis.

The cement gland of N. (N.) inermes sp. n. is smaller than that of N. (N.) pterodoridis and larger than that of N. (N.) pimelodis. The cement reservoir is larger than those of both other species. Morphological study presents similarities between the anatomy of the N. (N.) inermes sp. n. and both N. (N.) pterodoridis and N. (N.) pimelodis, but it is distinguished by significant differences in the main organs of these 2 species.

Based on these characteristics, the present work describes the first species of the genus parasitizing A. inermis, the eighth species of the genus described from Brazil. Thus, the present work contributes to the knowledge of Brazilian parasites by adding a new species and new host for the genus Neoechinorhynchus.

References

Amato, J. F. R., Boeger, W. A., & Amato, S. B. (1991). Protocolos para laboratório-coleta e processamento de parasitas do pescado. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Universitária, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. [ Links ]

Amin, O. M. (2002). Revision of Neoechinorhynchus Stiles & Hassal, 1905 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) with Keys to 88 species in two subgenera. Systematic Parasitology, 53, 1–18. [ Links ]

Brasil-Sato, M. C., & Pavanelli, G. C. (1998). Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi sp. n. (Eoacanthocephala, Neoechinorhynchidae) parasitizing Pimelodus maculatus Lacépede, “mandi-amarelo” (Siluroidei, Pimelodidae) from the basin of the São Francisco River, Três Marias, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 15, 1003–1011. [ Links ]

Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M., & Shostak, A. W. (1997). Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al Revisited. American Society of parasitologists. The Journal of Parasitology, 83, 574–583. [ Links ]

Martins, M. L., Fujimoto, R. Y., Andrade, P. M., & Tavares-Dias, M. (2000). Recent studies on Neoechinorhynchus curemai Noronha, 1973 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae). In Prochilodus Lineatus Valenciennes, 1836, From Volta Grande reservoir, MG, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 60, 673–682. [ Links ]

Noronha, D. (1984). Remarcks on Neoechinorhynchus curemai Noronha, 1973 (Eoacanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae). Memórias do Instiuto Oswaldo Cruz, 79, 271. [ Links ]

Salgado-Maldonado, G. (1978). Acantocéfalos de peces IV. Descripcion de dos especies nuevas de Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) y algunas consideraciones sobre este género. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología, 49, 35–48. [ Links ]

Santos, C. P., Gibson, D. I., Tavares, L. E. R., & Luque, J. L. (2008). Checklist of Acanthocephala associated with the fishes of Brazil. Zootaxa, 1983, 1–22. [ Links ]

Thatcher, V. E. (1981). Neoechinorhynchus pterodoridis n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) do bacu liso (Pterodoras granulosus) da Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica, 11, 445–448. [ Links ]

Thatcher, V. E. (2006). Amazon fish parasites (2a Ed.). Moscow: Editora Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America. [ Links ]

1Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Received: September 23, 2016; Accepted: July 24, 2017

* Corresponding author: Ramón Cuevas-Guzmán, e-mail: danielbporto81@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License