Notas científicas

 

First record and geographic distribution of Ophiambix devaneyi (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in the Gulf of Mexico

 

Primer registro y distribución geográfica de Ophiambix devaneyi (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) en el golfo de México

 

Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín^1*, Alfredo Laguarda-Figueras¹, Alicia Durán-González¹, Julio Adrián Arriaga-Ochoa², Andrea Alejandra Caballero-Ochoa² y Mauricio Valdés-de Anda¹

 

¹ Colección Nacional de Equinodermos "Dra. Ma. Elena Caso Muñoz", Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-305, 04510 México, D. F., Mexico. * fasolis@cmarl.unam.mx

² Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-305, 04510 México, D. F., Mexico.

 

Recibido: 27 junio 2013
Aceptado: 01 abril 2014

 

Abstract

The geographic distribution of Ophiambix devaneyi Paterson, 1985 is extended to a new locality within the Gulf of Mexico. This species is an extremely rare ophiuroid, not only because of its morphology, which makes it unique, but also because there are only 2 other specimens that have been collected around the world. New habitat information of the species is provided.

Key words: new record.

 

Resumen

La distribución geográfica Ophiambix devaneyi Paterson, 1985 se extiende hacia una nueva localidad dentro del golfo de México. Esta especie de ofiuroideo es extremadamente rara, no sólo por su morfología, que la hace única, sino además porque sólo existen 2 ejemplares recolectados en todo el mundo. Se aporta nueva información sobre el hábitat de esta especie.

Palabras clave: nuevo registro.

 

Ophiambix devaneyi Paterson, 1985 is one of the 4 species that comprise the genus Ophiambix Lyman, 1880 (family Ophiuridae Müller and Troschel, 1840, subfamily Ophiurinae Lyman, 1865). O. aculeatus Lyman, 1880 is distributed in Japan, Fiji Islands, Hawaii and New Zealand (430-4 634 m); O. epicopus Paterson and Baker, 1988 is distributed also in Japan and the Kermadec Islands (530-606 m) and O. meteoris Bartsch, 1983 is distributed in the mid North Atlantic (306-5 315 m). O. devaneyi has been only reported in the Caribbean Sea, from its type locality. This is the first time that O. devaneyi has been found as part of the brittle star species of the Gulf of Mexico (Bank of Campeche), at 418-427 m depths and living on sinking wood.

Although recent and detailed checklists of the Gulf of Mexico echinoderms have been published (Pawson et al., 2009), other studies (Laguarda-Figueras et al., 2009) support the idea that a critical analysis on taxonomy and environmental factors related to the distribution of the ophiuroids is still needed for many species. Such kind of studies are necessary because many of these species are small, cryptic and taxonomically problematic (e.g., Ophiambix); with peculiar or restricted habitats; and other fairly common species have never been properly studied from a taxonomic viewpoint (e.g., Amphiura).

The specimen collected was compared with the diagnosis by Paterson (1985) and deposited in the Colección Nacional de Equinodermos de México, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ICML-UNAM).

Order Ophiurida Müller and Troschel, 1840
Family Amphiuridae Müller and Troschel, 1840
Subfamily Ophiurinae Lyman, 1865
Genus Ophiambix Lyman, 1880
Ophiambix devaneyi Paterson, 1985
Ophiambix devaneyi Paterson, 1985: 142-144, figs. 54 and 57a-d; Paterson and Baker, 1988: 1588-1589, figs. 1a-f, 2e, 4; Benavides-Serrato, 2011: 277.

Diagnosis (from Paterson, 1985): disk round, covered with thin imbricating plates amongst which neither the primary plates nor the radial shields are distinct: diameter up to 3 mm. The plates carry small but very elaborate pyramidal spinelets. The ventral interradial area is covered with thin plates without spinelets. There are 2 spine-like apical papillae flanked on each side by 2 spaced spine-like oral papillae. The second oral tentacle pore is large and opens outside the mouth slit; it is armed with 4 pointed, spine-like tentacle scales, 2 on the first ventral arm plate and 2 on the adoral shield. The adoral shields are narrow, longer than broad. The oral shield is irregular in shape, sometimes triangular. The genital slits are adjacent to the first lateral arm plate. The arms are short, about equal to the disk diameter in length. They are not clearly distinguished from the disk and spinelets extend onto the arm. Dorsal arm plates are only distinct distally and appear to be fan shaped and contiguous; proximally triangular shaped accessory plates flank them but spinelets obscure the plate boundaries. The ventral arm plates are rectangular, longer than broad, slightly indented laterally adjacent to the tentacle pores, and contiguous along most of the arm. The lateral arm plates are enlarged and flared at their distal ends. The second lateral arm plate is particularly enlarged and nearly reaches the edge of the disk. The tentacle pores are large and open; each one is armed with 2 simple spine-like tentacle scales, 1 on the ventral arm plate and 1 on the lateral arm plate. There are 3-4 arm spines proximally; the ventral most one is hooked and the others become progressively fan shaped toward the dorsal side; the dorsal most or second dorsal most spines are the largest.

Description: disk small (diameter 2.3 mm), rounded, covered with thin translucent plates. The plates carry very small pyramidal spinelets that are arranged around the larger plates following the margin. Ventral interradial area covered with thin plates without spinelets. Two spine-like apical papillae flanked on each side by 2 spine-like oral papillae. Adoral shields very narrow. Oral shields triangular with rounded tips. Genital slits small, narrow, adjacent to the first lateral arm plate. The longest arm is 11 mm, and are not clearly distinguished from the disk. Dorsal arm plates are only distinct distally. The ventral arm plates are rectangular and difficult to observe. The lateral arm plates are enlarged and flared at their distal ends; the second lateral arm plate is particularly enlarged and nearly reaches the edge of the disk. The tentacle pores are large and widely open; each one is armed with 2 small spine-like tentacle scales. Three or 4 arm spines proximally, the dorsal most or second dorsal most spines are the largest (0.38 mm), distally there are 2 or 3 spines, the terminal part of the arms are without arm spines, probably lost during mechanical manipulation.

Distribution: off Dominican Leeward Island (15°32' N, 61°13' W); off Tolu, Colombia (Borrero-Pérez et al., 2008; Benavides-Serrato et al., 2011). This record expands its geographic distribution to the northwest, to the Campeche Bank, Gulf of Mexico (from 19º16.272' N, 93º06.691' W to 19º16.045' N, 93º04.613' W).

Bathymetric distribution: 146-494 m (Paterson, 1985).

Material examined: ICML-UNAM 9920, one specimen, RV Justo Sierra, COBERPES V, Sta. A15, Campeche Bank, Gulf of Mexico (from 19º16.272' N, 93º06.691' W to 19º16.045' N, 93º04.613' W), May 25^th, 2013; 418-427 m depth.

The systematic position of the genus Ophiambix has confused echinoderm researchers for many years, resulting in it being placed at various times in 3 different families. Meissner (1901) placed it in the family Amphiuridae. H. L. Clark (1911) followed this classification scheme but with reservations. Matsumoto (1915, 1917) transferred it to the family Ophiacanthidae, mainly because of the spinelet covering of the disk and its lack of infradental papillae. Since then, it has been regarded as an anomalous genus in this heterogeneous family. Paterson and Baker (1988) confirmed its placement in the subbfamily Ophiurinae, by examining the shapes and morphology of arm vertebrate, the shape of the articulation surface, the disk spinelets and the arm spines using the scanning electron microscope.

All 4 species of Ophiambix have a low body profile, with flat wide arms and flattish arm spines. O. aculeatus were found inside borings or vesicles in pumice trawled from deep water (Lyman, 1880). Bartsch (1983) noted that O. meteoris had wood fragments in the gut; Paterson and Baker (1988) also found wood fragments of wood in O. aculeatus suggesting that they may feed on microbes associated with decaying wood. The present record supports such theory since the specimen found was living on sinking wood together with other echinoderms such as Asterina sp. and Ophiacantha sp.

Thanks to Adolfo Gracia Gasca and Ana Rosa Vázquez Bader ICML, UNAM (PAPIIT IN223109-3 Biodiversidad y recursos pesqueros potenciales del mar profundo del Golfo de México) for supporting our participation in the COBERPES cruises on board of the RV Justo Sierra. Magali Galván Palmerín and Ana Rosa Vázquez Bader ICML, UNAM, took the photographs in figure 1. Tania Pineda provided much appreciated comments on earlier versions of this paper.

 

Literature cited

Bartsch, I. 1983. Ophiambix meteoris n. sp., ein neuer Schlangenstern aus der Iberischen Tiefsee. (Ophiacanthidae, Ophiuroidea). Spixiana 6:97-100.         [ Links ]

Benavides-Serrato, M., G. H. Borrero-Pérez and C. M. Díaz-Sánchez. 2011. Equinodermos del Caribe Colombiano 1: Crinoidea, Asteroidea y Ophiuroidea. Serie de Publicaciones Especiales de Invemar 22. Santa Marta, Colombia. 384 p.         [ Links ]

Borrero-Pérez, G. H., M. Benavides-Serrato, O. Solano and G. R. Navas. 2008. Brittle-stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from the continental shelf and upper slope of the Colombia Caribbean. Revista Biología Tropical 56(Suppl. 3):169-204.         [ Links ]

Clark, H. L. 1911. North Pacific ophiurans in the collections of the United States National Museum. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 75:1-302.         [ Links ]

Laguarda-Figueras, A., A. Hernández-Herrejón, F. A. Solís-Marín and A. Durán-González. 2009. Los ofiuroideos del Caribe Mexicano y Golfo de México. Conabio-UNAM. México, D. F. 249 p.         [ Links ]

Lyman, T. 1880. A structural feature, hitherto unknown among echinodermata found in deep-sea ophiurans. Anniversary memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History. 12 p.         [ Links ]

Matsumoto, H. 1915. A new classification of the Ophiuroidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 67:43-92.         [ Links ]

Matsumoto, H. 1917. A monograph of Japanese Ophiuroidea, arranged according to a new classification. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University, Tokyo 38:1-408.         [ Links ]

Meissner, M. 1901. Ophiuroidea (Schlangensterne). Bronn's Klassen und Ordungen des Thierreichs 3:902-966.         [ Links ]

Paterson, G. L. J. 1985. The deep-sea Ophiuroidea of the North Atlantic Ocean.The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology) 49:1-162.         [ Links ]

Paterson, G. L. J. and A. N. Baker. 1988. A revision of the genus Ophiambix (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) including the description of a new species. Journal of Natural History 22:1579-1590.         [ Links ]

Pawson, D. L., D. Vance, C. G. Messing, F. A. Solís-Marín and C. L. Mah. 2009. 71. Echinodermata of the Gulf of Mexico. In Gulf of Mexico, origin, waters, and biota. Biota Volume 1, Biodiversity, D. L. Felder and D. K. Camp. 2009. Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Series. Texas A & M University Press. College Station. p. 1177-1204.         [ Links ]