- Citado por SciELO
- Similares en SciELO
versión On-line ISSN 2007-8706versión impresa ISSN 1870-3453
Rev. Mex. Biodiv. vol.80 no.1 México abr. 2009
Taxonomía y sistemática
A new species of Dichromanthus (Orchidaceae, Spiranthinae) from Oaxaca, Mexico
Una especie nueva de Dichromanthus (Orchidaceae, Spiranthinae) de Oaxaca, México
Gerardo A. Salazar* and Abisaí GarcíaMendoza
Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70367, 04510 México, D. F., México.
Recibido: 31 marzo 2008
Aceptado: 16 junio 2008
Dichromanthus yucundaa, a new orchid species from the Mixteca Alta region of the Sierra Madre del Sur in Oaxaca, Mexico, is described and illustrated. It is distinguished from D. cinnabarinus, the most similar species, by the more compact plants, glabrous inflorescence, prominent, broadly ovate, glabrous floral bracts which are abaxially glaucous, sparsely and minutely glandularpubescent sepals (merely papillose near the apex), short column foot, viscidium sheathing the apex of the rostellum and without a retrorse prominence, and rostellum remnant stiff and pointed.
Key words: Dichromanthus yucundaa, endemism, Mixteca Alta region, Oaxaca, rostellum, rostellum remnant, viscidium.
Se describe e ilustra a Dichromanthus yucundaa, especie nueva de orquídea de la región de la mixteca alta de la sierra Madre del Sur en Oaxaca, México. Se distingue de D. cinnabarinus, la especie más similar, por las plantas más compactas, la inflorescencia glabra, las brácteas florales prominentes, ampliamente ovadas, glabras, abaxialmente glaucas, los sépalos diminuta y esparcidamente glandularpubescentes (diminutamente papilosos cerca del ápice), el pie de columna corto, el viscidio envainando el ápice del rostelo y careciendo de una prominencia retrorsa y el remanente rostelar rígido y aguzado.
Palabras clave: Dichromanthus yucundaa, endemismo, región de la mixteca alta, Oaxaca, remanente rostelar, rostelo, viscidio.
The genus Dichromanthus Garay was originally proposed to include a single species, D. cinnabarinus, which had been placed by other taxonomists either in the catchall genus Spiranthes Rich. s.l. (e.g. Williams, 1951; Ames and Correll, 1952; McVaugh, 1985) or in Stenorrhynchos Rich. (Lindley, 1840; Schlechter, 1920). Dichromanthus was distinguished from other genera in Spiranthinae mainly by its "soft, pliable, linear oblong, blunt rostellum" (Garay 1982), or more correctly rostellum remnant, i.e., what remains of the rostellum after the removal of the viscidium. In contrast, Spiranthes s.str. and Stenorrhynchus s.str. have bifid and stiffly pointed rostellum remnants, respectively (Garay, 1982; Greenwood, 1982). Balogh and Greenwood (1982) and Greenwood (1982) also noted the distinctive rostellum of 'Spiranthes' cinnabarina, describing its viscidium as "pluglike" in reference to the retrorse extension or "tail" that fits within the "tubulartipped" rostellum remnant, in contrast with the sheathing viscidium that encloses the "bristlelike" rostellum remnant of Stenorrhynchos. Balogh and Greenwood (1982) also proposed a new genus for 'S.' cinnabarina, Cutsis BurnsBal., E. W. Greenw. et R. González, but Garay's Dichromanthus had nomenclatural priority.
More recently, there have been 2 opposing views concerning the delimitation of Dichromanthus. On the one hand, Salazar et al. (2002, 2003) and Salazar (2003) adopted a broader concept of the genus to include 2 additional species, namely D. aurantiacus (La Llave et Lex.) Salazar et Soto Arenas and D. michuacanus (La Llave et Lex.) Salazar et Soto Arenas, based on their many vegetative, reproductive, and genetic similarities to D. cinnabarinus (see also Figueroa et al., 2008). On the other hand, taxonomists that prefer to base their groupings solely on floral (mostly rostellum) characters, such as Szlachetko et al. (2005), have instead maintained Dichromanthus as a monospecific genus and placed the other 2 species in the genus Stenorrhynchos, which according to molecular phylogenetic studies makes the latter polyphyletic (Salazar et al., 2003).
In this work we follow the broader generic concept of Dichromanthus of Salazar et al. (2002; 2003), according to which the genus consists of 3 hitherto described species and is distributed in the highlands of southern USA (Arizona and Texas), most major mountain ranges of Mexico, as well as Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras (Salazar, 2003).We describe herein a further species, discovered in the course of botanical exploration conducted recently in the Mixteca Alta region of the Sierra Madre del Sur, state of Oaxaca, Mexico.
Holotype: MEXICO. Oaxaca: Distrito Teposcolula, municipio San Pedro y San Pablo Teposcolula, ladera noroeste del Cerro Pueblo Viejo de Teposcolula Yucunda, 2286 m elev., collected 28 Apr. 2007, pressed in cultivation 14 May 2007, A. GarcíaMendoza et S. Franco 8744 (MEXU!).
Dichromantho cinnabarino (La Llave et Lex.) Garay similis, sed statura minore, inflorescentia glabra, bracteis floralibus prominentibus, late ovatis, glabris, extus glaucis, sepalis minute sparseque glandularipubescentibus ad apicem papillosis, pede columnae breviore, viscidio vaginanti sine prominentia retrorsa et residuo rostelli rigido acutissimo differt.
Terrestrial, acaulescent herb 2030 cm in height above ground, including the inflorescence. Roots fasciculate, terete, glabrous or with occasional simple trichomes, 415 cm long, 47 mm in diameter. Leaves 35, forming a basal rosette, present at flowering time, deciduous, ellipticoblanceolate, acute at apex, tapering at base into a broad, sheathing petiole, glaucous, 11.515 cm long, 1.23.2 cm wide. Inflorescence arising from the center of the rosette of leaves, racemose, glabrous, 2030 cm long; scape terete, partially covered by 2 strict tubular, acute bracts; raceme dense, subsecund, 6.515.5 cm long, with 717 flowers, most of them open at the same time. Floral bracts prominent, about as long as to conspicuously longer than the flowers, bright red, abaxially glaucous, loosely concave, ovate, acuminate, 2.54.5 cm long. Flowers resupinate, odorless, fleshy, slightly ascending to nearly horizontal; ovary and dorsal sepal orangered, lateral sepals orangeyellow with red suffusion, especially along the midvein; petals and labellum yellow with whitish base; column dorsally reddishwhite, yellow ventrally. Sepals erect on their proximal twothirds forming a strong floral tube together with the other floral segments, flaring on the distal onethird; dorsal sepal adherent to the lateral sepals and petals on its proximal twothirds, abaxially minutely and sparsely glandularpubescent, most noticeably so along the margins, with the trichomes becoming papillae near the apex, concave, triangularlanceolate, acute, with a slight broadening shortly below the apex, 2224 mm long, 67 mm wide; lateral sepals free from each other but adherent to the petals on their proximal twothirds, with pubescence as in the dorsal sepal, slightly concave, keeled dorsally, obliquely triangular, acute, unequally broadened near the apex, 2425 mm long, 34.5 mm wide. Petals erect on their proximal twothirds, flaring above, sparsely glandularciliate, the trichomes reduced to papillae near the apex, slightly concave, linear on proximal threefourths, falcate above, subacute, ca. 25 mm long, 2.5 mm wide. Labellum sessile, erect and parallel to the column below the middle, slightly arching downwards above, concavechanneled on the proximal twothirds, more or less flat above, abaxially papillose throughout, with the papillae elongated and fingerlike on the external part of the nectary, smaller and conical elsewhere (absent on the distal internal onethird), margins ciliate; basal onefourth conduplicatechanneled, forming a narrow nectary in which nectar accumulates as droplets, with slightly thickened, glabrous nectar glands inside the margins near the base; when flattened lanceolateoblong, acute, with the apical margins slightly upturned, ca. 20 mm long, 5.5 mm wide. Column clavate, somewhat dorsiventrally compressed, semiterete, flat and glabrous on proximal half of adaxial surface, slightly convex and papillose above, ca. 11 mm long, 3.5 mm wide, provided at base with a column foot obliquely decurrent at the apex of the ovary, the foot forming a steep obtuse angle with the column proper, 22.5 mm long. Anther dorsal, triangularoblong, acute, imperfectly 4celled, sessile, with fleshy connective. Pollinarium formed by 2 acicular, deeply cleft, creamywhite granular pollinia attached to the dorsal surface of the linearligulate, grey viscidium; whole pollinarium ca. 11 mm long, 1 mm wide. Rostellum narrowly triangular, its apex covered by the viscidium like a sheath; rostellum remnant stiff, narrowly pointed, ca. 3.3 mm long. Stigma entire, transversely elliptic, shiny and somewhat sticky at anthesis. Ovary ascending, subsessile, obliquely obpyramidalobovoid, twisted, with 3 ribbonlike ribs, sparsely papillose with few, rather short glandular trichomes near the apex, 512.5 mm long, 34.5 mm in diameter near the apex. Developing capsules ascending, ellipsoid, ca. 15 mm long, 5 mm in diameter (not seen mature).
Additional specimens examined. MEXICO. Oaxaca: Distrito Teposcolula, municipio San Pedro y San Pablo Teposcolula, al este de la iglesia de Pueblo Viejo de Teposcolula Yucunda, 2423 m elev., 17 Sep. 2005, A. GarcíaMendoza, S. Franco et F. Martínez 7962 (MEXU!).
Other records. MEXICO. Oaxaca: municipio de San Bartolo Soyaltepec, Cerro Yucundú [sic], cerca de Unión Reforma, Aug. 2007, O. Santiago s.n. (photographs of plant in situ and closeup of old inflorescence, MEXU!).
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the Cerro Viejo de Teposcolula Yucunda, where the new species was first discovered. The Mixtec word yucundaa may be translated as "on the plain of the mountain".
Distribution and habitat. Dichromanthus yucundaa is known only from 2 locations in the Mixteca Alta region of the Sierra Madre del Sur, in northeastern Oaxaca, Mexico. It lives in soil pockets on limestone rocky ground in open, disturbed areas originally covered by pineoak forest at 22802400 m elevation. At the type locality, the original vegetation consists of a Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl.Quercus acutifolia Née forest and the plants of D. yucundaa were found growing with other herbs such as Sprekelia formosissima (L.) Herb. (Amarillydaceae), Cyperus spectabilis Link (Cyperaceae), Lycurus phleoides Kunth (Poaceae), and Ophioglossum engelmannii Prantl (Ophioglossaceae), in addition to at least 19 additional orchid species. These include the epiphytes Epidendrum lignosum La Llave et Lex., Laelia albida Lindl., L. furfuracea Lindl., Prosthechea concolor (La Llave et Lex.) W. E.Higgins and P. aff. citrina (La Llave et Lex.) W. E.Higgins, and the terrestrials Aulosepalum pyramidale (Lindl.) M. A. Dix et M. W. Dix, Bletia sp., Corallorhiza wisteriana Conrad, Cypripedium molle Lindl., Deiregyne confusa Garay, Govenia capitata Lindl., G. lagenophora Lindl., Habenaria subauriculata B. L. Rob. et Greenm., Hexalectris grandiflora (A. Rich. et Galeotti) L. O. Williams, Mesadenus polyanthus (Rchb.f.) Schltr., Ocampoa mexicana A. Rich. et Galeotti, Ponthieva schaffneri (Rchb.f.) E. W. Greenw., Sarcoglottis schaffneri (Rchb.f.) Ames, and Schiedeella llaveana (Lindl.) Schltr. Flowering occurs in May and developing fruits were recorded in September.
This species is similar in overall vegetative and floral structure to D. cinnabarinus, the type species of Dichromanthus, but differs from it in the compact plants barely reaching 2030 cm in height, the proportionately shorter leaves and inflorescences, the glabrous inflorescence with comparatively few (717) flowers, the prominent, slightly concave, broadly ovate floral bracts that are glabrous throughout and glaucous on the abaxial surface, the sepals minutely and sparsely glandularpubescent with papillose apices, the short column foot not longdecurrent on the apex of the ovary, the sheathing viscidium without a retrorse prominence inserted in the rostellum, and the stiff, pointed rostellum remnant. The last 2 attributes are particularly critical, since D. cinnabarinus is unique in Spiranthinae (sensu Salazar et al., 2003; Salazar, 2003) in that the viscidium, instead of forming a sheath covering the apex of the rostellum, is removed as a whole by the pollinator, leaving at the apex of the more or less blunt rostellum remnant a membranaceous "pouch" or cavity in which its retrorse extension or tail was hidden (Balogh and Greenwood, 1982; Greenwood, 1982; Salazar, 2003). Since the features of the rostellum have traditionally been considered of prime importance for generic delimitation in Spiranthinae (e.g., Schlechter, 1920; Balogh, 1982; Garay, 1982; Szlachetko et al., 2005), onecharacter taxonomists may disagree with our generic placement of the new species. Using the key to the genera of Mesoamerican "Stenorrhynchidinae" (a polyphyletic segregate of Spiranthinae considered here as its synonym; Salazar et al., 2003) in Szlachetko et al. (2005), D. yucundaa keys out to Coccineorchis Schltr., another member of Spiranthinae with showily colored, tubular flowers and stiffly pointed rostellar remnant which is not closely related neither to Dichromanthus nor to Stenorrhynchos (see Salazar et al., 2003), unless one decides to call the leaves "cauline" (i.e. spaced along the lower part of the scape) instead of rosulate, in which case it keys out to Stenorrhynchos. However, D. yucundaa shares many features with D. aurantiacus, D. cinnabarinus, and D. michuacanus, and its likeness in floral structure and color to Stenorrhynchos and Coccineorchis likely is the result of convergence for hummingbird pollination (cf. van der Pijl and Dodson, 1966). The differences between D. yucundaa and the other species of Dichromanthus are summarized in Table 1.
It is worth noting that, in spite of the considerable collecting efforts conducted in Oaxaca during the last 3 decades (reviewed in GarcíaMendoza, 2004; Soto and Salazar, 2004) and of its showy inflorescence, this species appears not to have been collected previously. Therefore it could represent a true narrow endemic and not a widespread, overlooked species. There are other welldocumented cases of orchid endemism in the Mixtec region and the adjacent arid valleys of Oaxaca and of TehuacánCuicatlán, including Barkeria melanocaulon A. Rich. et Galeotti, Cypripedium molle, Habenaria subauriculata, Laleoglossum thysanochilum (B. L. Rob. et Greenm.) Salazar, and Dichromanthus cinnabarinus subsp. galeottianus (Schltr.) Soto Arenas et Salazar (Soto and Salazar, 2004). As in the case of D. yucundaa, all these species appear to be largely restricted to areas with an extensive exposure of limestone.
Both localities where D. yucundaa has been found are affected by considerable anthropogenic disturbance, mainly in the form of clearing of the forest and cattle grazing. Likewise, the other 3 species of Dichromanthus are often found in disturbed or marginal habitats, such as induced grasslands and roadside banks, in areas dominated by PinusQuercus forest, tropical deciduous forest or xerophilous scrub, often on rocky terrain such as basaltic or limestone rocky fields (Luer, 1975; Salazar, 2003; Coleman, 2005; Hágsater et al., 2005; Salazar et al., 2006). However, D. aurantiacus, D. cinnabarinus, and D. michuacanus are all widespread and usually form large populations, whereas D. yucundaa appears to be rather localized and, at least at the type locality, the population consists of a few scattered individuals (A. GarcíaMendoza, pers. obs.). Given its restricted distribution and sparse, small populations, D. yucundaa might be considered as a rare species, although further field studies are required to ascertain its conservation status.
We thank Sonia Franco and Francisco Martínez for assistance in the field during the collection of this species, Rolando Jiménez Machorro for preparing the line drawing, Fernando Chiang for revising the Latin diagnosis, Victoria Sosa and 2 anonymous reviewers for useful suggestion to the manuscript, and Benjamín Valencia and Oscar Santiago for bringing to our attention the photographic records of D. yucundaa from San Bartolo Soyaltepec.
Ames, O. and D. S. Correll. 1952. Orchids of Guatemala, part 1. Fieldiana (Botany) 26:1395. [ Links ]
Balogh P. 1982. Generic redefinition in subtribe Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 69:11191132. [ Links ]
Balogh, P. and E. W. Greenwood. 1982. Cutsis Balogh, Greenwood and Gonzales [sic], a new genus from Mexico. Phytologia 51:297298. [ Links ]
Coleman, R. A. 2005. Population studies in Dichromanthus and Hexalectris in southeastern Arizona. Selbyana 26:446250. [ Links ]
Figueroa, C., G. A. Salazar, A. Zavaleta and M. Engleman. 2008. Root character evolution and systematics in Cranichidinae, Prescottiinae and Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae). Annals of Botany 101:509520. [ Links ]
Garay, L. A. 1982 ("1980"). A generic revision of the Spiranthinae. Botanical Museum Leaflets (Harvard University) 28:277425. [ Links ]
GarcíaMendoza, A. 2004. Integración del conocimiento florístico. In Biodiversidad de Oaxaca, A. GarcíaMendoza, M. J. Ordóñez and M. BrionesSalas (eds.). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoFondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, MéxicoWorld Wildlife Fund, Mexico City. p. 305325. [ Links ]
Greenwood, E. W. 1982. Tipos de viscidio en Spiranthinae. Orquídea (Mexico City) 8:283310. [ Links ]
Hágsater, E., M. A. Soto, G. A. Salazar, R. Jiménez, M. A. López and R. L. Dressler. 2005. Orchids of Mexico. Instituto Chinoin, A.C., Mexico City. p. 1302. [ Links ]
Lindley, J. 1840. The genera and species of orchidaceous plants: Tribe VI. Neottieae. J. Ridgway, London. p. 441524. [ Links ]
Luer, C. A. 1975. The native orchids of the United States and Canada excluding Florida. The New York Botanical Garden, Ipswich, Mass. p. 1361. [ Links ]
McVaugh, R. 1985. Orchidaceae. In Flora NovoGaliciana: a descriptive account of the vascular plants of Western Mexico, vol. 16, W. R. Anderson (ed.). The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan. p. 1363. [ Links ]
Salazar, G. A. 2003. Spiranthinae. In Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 3: Orchidoideae part 2, A. Vanilloideae, M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase and F. N. Rasmussen (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford. p. 164278. [ Links ]
Salazar, G. A., M. W. Chase and M. A. Soto. 2002. Galeottiellinae, a new subtribe and other nomenclatural changes in Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae). Lindleyana 17:172176. [ Links ]
Salazar, G. A., M. W. Chase, M. A. Soto and M. Ingrouille. 2003. Phylogenetics of Cranichideae with emphasis on Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae): evidence from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 90:777795. [ Links ]
Salazar, G. A., J. Reyes, C. Brachet and J. Pérez. 2006. Orquídeas y otras plantas nativas de la Cañada, Cuicatlán, Oaxaca, México. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City. p. 1173. [ Links ]
Schlechter, R. 1920. Versuch einer systematischen Neuordnung der Spiranthinae. Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt 37:317454. [ Links ]
Soto, M. A. and G. A. Salazar. 2004. Orquídeas. In Biodiversidad de Oaxaca, A. GarcíaMendoza, M. J. Ordóñez and M. BrionesSalas (eds.). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoFondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, MéxicoWorld Wildlife Fund, Mexico City. p. 271295. [ Links ]
Szlachetko, D. L., P. Rutkowski and J. Mytnik. 2005. Contributions to the taxonomic revision of the subtribes Spiranthinae, Stenorrhynchidinae and Cyclopogoninae (Orchidaceae) in Mesoamerica and the Antilles. Polish Botanical Studies 20:3387. [ Links ]
Williams, L. O. 1951. The Orchidaceae of Mexico. Ceiba 2:1321. [ Links ]