versão impressa ISSN 1870-3453
Rev. Mex. Biodiv. v.79 supl.ago México ago. 2008
Placobdella lamothei n. sp. (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae), a new leech parasite of freshwater turtles from Estado de México, Mexico
Placobdella lamothei n. sp. (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae), sanguijuela nueva parásita de tortugas de agua dulce del Estado de México, México
Alejandro OcegueraFigueroa 1, 2* and Mark E. Siddall 2
1 City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School and University Center, USA.
2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York, 10024, USA.
Recibido: 19 septiembre 2007
Aceptado: 19 febrero 2008
Placobdella lamothei n. sp. is described based on 10 specimens collected in Tonatico, Estado de México, Mexico. The new species resembles other species of the genus in the disposition of eyespots and mycetomes connected to the oesophagus and yet can be distinguished primarily on the basis of body pigmentation pattern. This species represents the second of the genus endemic to Mexico. We also discuss previous records of Placobdella spp. in Mexico and clarify some apparently incorrect determinations.
Key words: Placobdella, Kinosternon integrum, ectoparasite, bloodfeeding.
Se describe Placobdella lamothei n. sp. con base en el estudio de 10 ejemplares recolectados en Tonatico, Estado de México, México. La nueva especie se parece al resto de las especies del género en la disposición de las manchas oculares y en la presencia de micetomas que se conectan al esófago y se puede distinguir de ellas principalmente por los patrones de pigmentación del cuerpo. Esta especie endémica representa el segundo registro del género en México. Se discute sobre registros previos de Placobdella spp. en México y se hacen aclaraciones sobre registros aparentemente erróneos.
Palabras clave: Placobdella, Kinosternon integrum, ectoparásito, hematofagia.
Placobdellid leeches are well known and relatively common in North America where they occur feeding on amphibians, turtles and fish. According to Sawyer (1986), the genus Placobdella includes species defined by possessing triannulate somites, placobdellid ocular morphology (1 obvious pair of ocelli plus another smaller coalesced pair), 2 pairs of compact salivary glands and 1 pair of saclike symbiontbearing structures in the oesophagus called mycetomes. In a recent phylogenetic analysis of Glossiphoniidae, Siddall et al. (2005) found that members having placobdellid ocular morphology like those of Desserobdella spp. and Oligobdella biannulata Moore, 1900 all appear wellnested within Placobdella, notwithstanding their possession of diffuse salivary glands in the first case and biannulate somites in the later. As such, Desserobdella and Oligobdella should be considered subjective junior synonyms of Placobdella. The number of species of the genus is not well established and it is clear that a major revision is needed in order to clarify this issue. Tentativelly, 16 species of Placobdella have been described in North America, 1 in Europe: Placobdella costata (Müller 1864), and 3 poorly characterized species from South America (Ringuelet, 1985) that may well be species of Haementeria typical of that area. Contrasting with the substantial number of species from USA and Canada, only 2 species of placobdellids have been recorded in Mexico (Sawyer, 1986): Placobdella moorei Autrum, 1936 and Placobdella multilineata Moore 1953.
Materials and methods
In the course of ongoing research on the reproductive ecology of freshwater turtles conducted by Rodrigo MacipRíos in Tonatico, Estado de México, Mexico, placobdellid leeches were found attached to the carapace of Kinosternon integrum Le Conte, 1854. Leech specimens were collected and sent to the first author in July, 2004 in order to identify them. Following morphological inspection of the leeches, additional collections were made so as to preserve specimens in 100% ethanol for further studies and in order to record the colors of live specimens. Freshwater turtles were collected using a beach seine and examined for leeches attached to the plastron, the carapace, and to soft body regions. All the specimens were collected under the Scientific Collecting License FAUT0056, issued to Virginia LeónRègagnon. Leeches were detached from their host, transported to the laboratory and relaxed with gradual addition of 96% ethanol followed by fixation in 70% ethanol. The posterior sucker of 1 specimen was stored in 100% ethanol. Examination of external morphology and dissections were accomplished with a Nikon SMZU stereomicroscope. Photographs were taken using a Sony Cybershot DSCH5 and a SPOTRT (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.) digital camera attached to a stereomicroscope. Drawings were made by superposition of vectorart on placed images in Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems, San Jose California). Leeches were deposited in the Colección Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE), Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico and in the American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA (AMNH). For comparative purposes, Placobdella rugosa (Verrill, 1874) (CNHE 1691, 1695) and Placobdella mexicana (Moore, 1898) (CNHE 1646, 1683) also were examined.
Placobdella lamothei n. sp. (Figs. 14)
External morphology. Brownish, largest specimen 19 mm long, 4.8 mm wide. Complete somite triannulate, Somites III uniannulate. Somites IIIIV biannulate. Somites VXXIV triannulate. Somites XXVXXVII biannulate. Dorsum with 3 inconspicuous longitudinal rows of papillae from VII through XXV, 1 medial row with papillae in a1, a2 and a3, and 2 paramedial rows with papillae only on a2. Small papillae irregularly dispersed in the space not occupied by rows of papillae. One heavily pigmented longitudinal strip from VII to XXIV. Metameric paramedial and marginal pigmented patches on a2 from IX to XIV. Unpigmented medial zone on dorsum in somites IVIII partially interrupted in VI and VII a3. Posterior sucker brownish without radial pigmentation or papillae (Fig. 1). Ventral surface unpigmented save for rare chromatophores and without papillae (fig. 2). Two pair eyespots in «placobdellid» arrangement, inconspicuous confluent pair on II and larger, conspicuous pair on III, also confluent. Mouth pore on the anterior margin of the oral sucker. Male gonopore between XI and XII. Female gonopore on XII between a2/a3, thus 2 annuli between gonopores. Anus between (a1,a2) and a3 of the biannulate somite XXVII.
Alimentary tract. Short and robust proboscis in membranous sheath reaching posteriorly to IX connecting to a conspicuously long and recurved oesophagus. Two pairs of well developed compact salivary glands connecting into base of proboscis; anterior (medial) pair is located in VIII connecting to base of proboscis via strong ducts in IX; posterior (lateral) pair of compact salivary glands in IX. Oesophagus unusually long for the genus, thick, connected anteriorly to base of proboscis and posteriorly with crop. One pair of saclike mycetomes in X connected with the oesophagus. Length of oesophagus from base of proboscis to mycetomes is approximately 2 times the length of the proboscis (Fig. 3). Crop with 7 pairs branched caeca from XIII to XIX; last pair forming postcaeca. Intestine with 4 simple caeca in somites XIXXXIII.
Reproductive anatomy. Atrial cornua welldeveloped anterolaterally directed. Highly coiled ejaculatory ducts immediately posterior to atrial cornua on somites XIXIII. Male median reproductive anatomy entirely anterior to XIII/a2. Five pairs intersegmental testisacs from XIII/XIV to XVII/XVIII. Ovisacs without common oviduct. Ovarian lobes from XII to XVIII, accessory anterior lobe arising from bifurcation at XIII, extending anteriorly to XII a3 (Fig. 4).
Type host: freshwater turtle Kinosternon integrum Le Conte, 1854.
Type locality: La Puerta de Santiago, Municipio de Tonatico, Estado de México. Mexico. 18°45'00''N 99°37'31''W. Altitude 1 630 m
Type material: holotype, CNHE 6030, August, 11 2007. Paratypes CNHE 6031, AMNH 5510 annelida, July, 2004. Specimens collected by Rodrigo MacipRíos, Noemí MatíasFerrer and Alejandro OcegueraFigueroa in the same locality and on the same host.
Etymology: this species is named in honor of Rafael Lamothe Argumedo, in recognition of his prolific scientific production and for being professor of invertebrate zoology for many years in the Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, inspiring and sharing with young biologists his love and passion for invertebrates.
According to the most recent account of World leeches (Sawyer, 1986), 2 species of Placobdella have been recorded from Mexico: P. moorei Autrum, 1936 and P. multilineata Moore, 1953. Autrum (1936) considered Placobdella a junior synonym of Haementeria. According to this, the name Placobdella mexicana Moore, 1898 was considered preoccupied by Haementeria mexicana de Fillipi, 1849. For this reason, Placobdella moorei Autrum, 1936 was erected in order to solve this apparently subjective synonymy. Interestingly, Haementeria mexicana was previously synonymized with Haementeria officinalis by Blanchard (1893) and presently Placobdella is no longer considered a synonym of Haementeria. This confusion was well understood and clarified in Ringuelet (1981, 1982) but not fully recovered in Sawyer's (1986) treatment, wherein he recognized Placobdella and Haementeria as distinct genera, yet still used the name Placobdella moorei instead of the correct ressurection of the available name Placobdella mexicana. As such, herein we formally resurrect Placobdella mexicana and consider Placobdella moorei to be a junior synonym.
Placobdella mexicana has been recorded only twice: in the original description, which was based on 3 specimens from an unspecified locality in Mexico (Moore, 1898) and 34 years later, by Oka (1932) who recorded this species from Chapala, Jalisco.
Caballero (1940, 1941) recorded Placobdella rugosa Verrill, 1874 from Xochimilco, México City and Cacahuamilpa, Guerrero. This species was considered a junior synonym of Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) by Soós (1969), to the extent that Klemm (1982) recorded P. ornata in Mexico based solely on this synonymy. The existence of multiple species of papillated leeches in North America has recently become clearer (Huges and Siddall, 2007; Siddall and Bowerman, 2006). Moore (1960) noted that the leeches depicted in Caballero's (1940; 1941) figures resemble Placobdella multistriata (Johansson, 1909) more closely than they do P. rugosa (i. e., P. ornata). This is an apparently mistake of Moore, 1960, who actually was referring to P. multilineata and not to P. multistriata as was made clear previously by Moore (1953). Alas, Sawyer (1986) considered the Mexican records of this leech to be P. multilineata.
Based on the revision of the material deposited in the CNHE labeled with the name Placobdella rugosa, collected in Xochimilco, México City (CNHE 1695) that contributed to the confusion described above, we determined that these specimens, illustrated in Caballero (1940) actually correspond to 2 different species of Helobdella: 4 specimens of Helobdella socimulcensis (Caballero, 1931) and 1 specimen of Helobdella atli OcegueraFigueroa and LeónRègagnon, 2005. Specimens collected in Cacahuamilpa, Guerrero (CNHE 1691) which were noted by Caballero (1941), correspond to the new species described in this work: Placobdella lamothei n. sp.
Placobdella lamothei n. sp. can be easily differentiated from the other placobdellid leech distributed in Mexico, P. mexicana (as noted above, previously P. moorei sensu Autrum, 1936 and Sawyer, 1986) based on the dorsal coloration pattern. Placobdella lamothei has a single, continuous longitudinal stripe in the dorsal surface, whereas in P. mexicana is interrupted. In addition to this character, is the unusual length of the oesophagus of Placobdella lamothei n. sp. that can be used to distinguish between both species. The length of the portion of the oesophagus between the base of the proboscis and the mycetomes is approximately 2 times the length of the proboscis in Placobdella lamothei n. sp., whereas in P. mexicana, it is shorter than the proboscis.
In terms of the development of dorsal papillae, the weak rows of papillae on Placobdella lamothei n. sp. strongly contrast with those of Placobdella ali Hughes and Siddall, 2007, Placobdella papillifera (Verrill, 1872), Placobdella ornata, Placobdella multilineata Yang and Davies, 1984 and Placobdella burresonae Siddall and Bowerman, 2006.
Placobdella biannulata (Moore, 1900) presents biannulate somites clearly distinguishing it from Placobdella lamothei n. sp. Placobdella phalera (Graff, 1899), Placobdella michiganensis (Sawyer, 1972), Placobdella cryptobranchii (Johnson and Klemm, 1977), Placobdella transluscens (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976) and Placobdella picta (Verrill, 1872) lack compact salivary glands clearly distinguishing these species from Placobdella lamothei n. sp.
Placobdella montifera Moore, 1906, which also has 3 rows of pronounced papillae, and Placobdella nuchalis Sawyer and Shelley, 1976 regularly present a constriction in the neck region (VII), resulting in a discoid head, in contrast to Placobdella lamothei n. sp. that lacks that characteristic.
Placobdella parasitica (Say, 1824) lacks papillae altogether, and has 812 bluish, greenish or brownish ventral longitudinal stripes. Placobdella translucens (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976) presents an indistinct medial interrupted longitudinal dorsal stripe and is weakly muscularized. Any of these characteristics are as observed in Placobdella lamothei n. sp.
In conclusion, 2 species of placobdellid leeches parasites of freshwater turtles occur in Mexico, Placobdella lamothei n. sp. and P. mexicana. Previous record of Placobdella ornata by Caballero (1941) should be considered erroneous, actually, this record corresponds to Placobdella lamothei n. sp.
The authors thank Rodrigo MacipRíos for the collection of specimens. Special thanks to Virginia LeónRègagnon, Luis GarcíaPrieto, Gerardo Pérez Ponce de León, and David OsorioSarabia for the invitation to participate in this volume. This study was partially founded by CONACyT in the form of a graduate scholarship (172322) to the first author.
Autrum, H. 1936. Hirudineen. In Bronns: Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, 4, III Abt., 4 Buch, 1 Teil, 1 Lief., Leipzig. 96 p. [ Links ]
Blanchard, R. 1893. Revision des Hirudinées du Musée de Turin. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia Comparata della Universita di Torino 8:132. [ Links ]
Caballero y C., E. 1940. Sobre la presencia de Placobdella rugosa (Hirudinea: Glossosiphonidae) en las aguas del lago de Xochimilco XIII. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 11:255260. [ Links ]
Caballero y C., E. 1941. Hirudíneos de México XVI.Nuevos huéspedes y localidades para algunas sanguijuelas ya conocidas y descripción de una nueva especie. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 12:747757. [ Links ]
Hughes, J. L. and M. E. Siddall. 2007. A new species of leech from the New York metropolitan area. American Museum Novitates 3578:16. [ Links ]
Klemm, D. J. 1982. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea) of North America. Aquatic Biology Section, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Support Laboratory. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. 177 p. [ Links ]
Moore, J. P. 1898. The leeches of the U.S. National Museum. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 1160: 543363. [ Links ]
Moore, J. P. 1953. Three undescribed north American leeches (Hirudinea). Notulae Naturae of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 250:113. [ Links ]
Moore, J. P. 1960. On the contributions of Dr. Eduardo Caballero y C. to Mexican hirudinology. Libro Homenaje al Dr. Eduardo Caballero y Caballero. Secretaría de Educación PúblicaInstituto Politécnico Nacional, México, D.F. p. 529531. [ Links ]
Oka, A. 1932. Hirudinées extraeuropéennes du Musée Zoologique Polonais. Annales Musei Zoologici Polonici 9:313330. [ Links ]
Ringuelet, R. A. 1981. Clave para el reconocimiento de los hirudíneos de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 52:8997. [ Links ]
Ringuelet, R. A. 1982. Hirudinea. In Aquatic biota of Mexico, Central America and the West Indies, S. H. Hurlbert and A. VillalobosFigueroa (eds.). San Diego State University, San Diego. p. 166171. [ Links ]
Ringuelet, R. A. 1985. Fauna de agua dulce de la República de Argentina, Hirudinea, FECIC, Buenos Aires, 321 p. [ Links ]
Sawyer, R. T. 1986. Leech biology and behaviour, feeding biology, ecology and systematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1065 p. [ Links ]
Siddall M. E. and J. Bowerman. 2006. A new species of glossiphoniid leech from Rana pretiosa (Amphibia: Raniidae) in Oregon. Journal of Parasitology 92:855857. [ Links ]
Siddall, M. E., R. B. Budinoff and E. Borda. 2005. Phylogenetic evaluation of systematics and biogeography of the leech family Glossiphoniidae. Invertebrate Systematics 19:105112. [ Links ]
Soós, A. 1969. Identification key to the leech (Hirudinoidea) genera of the world, with a catalogue of the species. IV. Family: Glossiphoniidae. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15:397454. [ Links ]