Services on Demand
Journal
Article
text new page (beta)
Spanish (pdf)
Article in xml format
Article references
Automatic translation
Send this article by e-mailIndicators
-
Cited by SciELO -
Access statistics
Related links
-
Similars in
SciELO
Share
Permalink
Revista odontológica mexicana
Print version ISSN 1870-199X
Rev. Odont. Mex vol.11 n.2 Ciudad de México Jun. 2007
https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2007.11.2.15874
Casos clínicos
Compensación ortodóntica de un paciente clase II división 1 quirúrgico. Caso clínico
Orthodontic compensation in a class II division I patient. Clinical case
* Alumna de la Especialidad de Ortodoncia de la División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM. México.
§ Profesor de la Especialidad de Ortodoncia de la División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM. México.
El objetivo de una compensación ortodóntica o camuflaje es tratar las discrepancias esqueléticas evitando la cirugía ortognática. Las extracciones dentales permiten obtener una correcta relación dental a pesar de que exista una relación incorrecta de clase II o III esquelética. Se describe el caso clínico de un paciente de 19 años de edad con diagnóstico clase II división 1 esquelética, al cual se decide compensar ortodónticamente realizando las extracciones de los primeros premolares superiores.
Palabras clave: Discrepancia esquelética; camuflaje; compensación ortodóntica; clase II división I
The objective of an orthodontic compensation or camouflage is to treat the skeletal discrepancies avoiding orthognatic surgery. Dental extractions allows us to obtain a correct dental relation even when an incorrect relation of skeletal Class II or III exist. Clinical Case: A 19 year old patient with Class II, skeletal division 1 diagnosis, which is decided to make an orthodontic compensation by extracting the first upper premolars.
Keywords: Skeletal discrepancies; orthodontic compensation; class II division I
Referencias
1. Proffit RW. Ortodoncia teoría y práctica. Mosby/Doyma Libros, 2da edición. Madrid 1994: 607-645. [ Links ]
2. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T. Maxillary expansion in class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study. Angle Ortodontist 2003; 73(3): 281-285. [ Links ]
3. Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ. Bioprogressive therapy. Part 5. J Clin Orthod 1978; 12: 48-69. [ Links ]
4. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 219-255. [ Links ]
5. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in class II correction. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 317-325. [ Links ]
6. Singh GD, Thind BS. Effects of the hewdgear-activator Teuscher appliance in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion; a geometric morphometric study. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6: 88-95. [ Links ]
7. Birkebaek L, Melsen B, Terp S. A laminographic study of the alterations in the temporomandibular joint following activator treatment. Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 257-66. [ Links ]
8. Demner LM, Kolotokov AP, Basharova ON. Cephalometric analysis of changes arising during treatment of prognathism. Stomatologica (Moskva). 1961; 48: 57-61. [ Links ]
9. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242-51. [ Links ]
10. Björk A. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment: a discussion based on cephalometric X-ray analysis of treated cases. Am J Orthod 1951; 37: 437-58. [ Links ]
11. Wieslander L, Lagerstrom L. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 20-6. [ Links ]
12. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 125-34. [ Links ]
Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons
