SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número6Delay aware Reactive Routing Protocols for QoS in MANETs: a ReviewAn Ultrasonic Levitator índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Journal of applied research and technology

versão On-line ISSN 2448-6736versão impressa ISSN 1665-6423

J. appl. res. technol vol.11 no.6 Ciudad de México Dez. 2013

 

A Meta-planing Systemic Model for Mexican Public Universities

 

R. Llarena del Rosario1, F. Lara-Rosano*2

 

1 CENEVAL.

2 Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México, D. F., México. *rllarenat@yahoo.com.mx.

 

ABSTRACT

Planning has been performed in Mexican public universities, since the 1940s, as a function promoted by government policies. However, the results were not as expected. We found through an exploratory study that this lack of planning efficiency derived from the obsolete planning conceptions and methods adopted.

In this paper a meta-planning model is proposed, based on the application of complexity sciences to social organization problems. In this context, only an eminently participative meta-planning process would allow to impulse change and development at the Mexican public universities.

Keywords: Complex systems, university planning, soft systems, meta-planning.

 

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the project Conacyt 152008

 

References

[1] Allen, R. G. (1998). Crop. evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements- FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Utah, USA: Utah State University Logan.         [ Links ]

[2] ANUIES. (1999). La Educación Superior hacia el Siglo XXI-Líneas estratégicas de desarrollo. México: ANUIES.         [ Links ]

[3] Checkland, P. y Poulter, J. (2006) Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use Practitioners, Teachers and Students. UK: Ed. Wiley.         [ Links ]

[4] Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method: a Positive Critique of interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.         [ Links ]

[5] Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge.         [ Links ]

[6] Lara-Rosano, F. (2002). Cibernética y Sistemas Cognitivos en Ingeniería de Sistemas: un enfoque interdisciplinario. J. Acosta Flores (ed). México: Alfaomega.         [ Links ]

[7] Lara-Rosano, F. (2011). Complejidad en las Organizaciones en Flores J. & Martínez Mekler, eds) Encuentros con la Complejidad. México: Siglo XXI y UNAM.         [ Links ]

[8] LLarena, R. et al, (1981). Panorámica y Perspectivas de la Planeación Educativa en México, Documento Síntesis de la Comisión Temática No. 7. Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa.         [ Links ]

[9] McMillan E. (2008) Complexity, Management and the Dynamics of Change: Challenges for practice. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

[10] McMillan E. (2005) Encouraging Strategic Change by Using Complexity-BasedPrinciples: A Case Study of the Open University, in Managing organizational complexity: philosophy, theory and application (K. Richardson, ed.). ISCE Publishing.         [ Links ]

[11] Mintzberg, H. et al. (1998). Safari a la estrategia. Barcelona: Ed. Granica.         [ Links ]

[12] Rojas, B. G. (2007). Problemas metodológicos de los estudios comparados en universidades. I Encuentro latinoamericano de estudios comparados en educación. Argentina. Recuperado de www.saece.org.ar/docs/congreso2/rojas_bravo        [ Links ]

[13] Stacey, R. D. (2003) Complexity and Group Processes, London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons