SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número3Comparación de ténicas avanzadas para el tratamiento de una solución modelo de índigo: Electro incineración, coagulación, química y enzimáticoEfecto del grado de acetilación en las características morfológicas y fisicoquímicas del almidón de plátano índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ingeniería química

versão impressa ISSN 1665-2738

Rev. Mex. Ing. Quím vol.8 no.3 Ciudad de México Dez. 2009

 

Ingeniería ambiental

 

Behavior of the mesophilic and termophilic anaerobic digestion in the stabilization of municipal wastewater sludge (Part 1)

 

Comportamiento de la digestión anaerobia mesofílica y termofílica en la estabilización de lodos residuales municipales (Parte 1)

 

J.M. Méndez–Contreras1*, J.A. Rendón–Sagardi1, J.E. Ruiz–Espinoza2, A. Alvarado–Lassman1 and S.A. Martínez–Delgadillo2

 

1 Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba 852, Tecnológico, Zapata 94320, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Orizaba Veracruz, México. * Corresponding author. E–mail: jmmendez@itorizaba.edu.mx Fax: 01–272–72–57056

2 Departamento de Ciencias básicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana —Azcapotzalco. Av. San Pablo 180. Azcapotzalco. 02200. México D.F.

 

Received 13 of May 2009
Accepted 18 of September 2009

 

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion process as an alternative for the biosolids production. Biological sludge from a municipal and industrial (brewery and pulp and paper) wastewater treatment plant using a UASB reactor was used. During the operation of the mesophilic batch system, the volatile solids (VS) were reduced from 60.3% (15.67 g/L) up to 37.5% (9.67 g/L) with 31 d of treatment time. The mesophilic process presented a stable operation reducing 38% of VS with 1.76 Kg VS m–3 d–1 of organic load feed fulfilling with the criterion of vectors attraction reduction. However, in mesophilic conditions, the digested sludge must be post–treated with a process of pathogenic microorganism inactivation because only remove low concentrations of pathogenic microorganism. The obtained results demonstrated that the process in thermophilic conditions (55°C) is capable to stabilize 3.9 Kg VS m–3 d–1 and to inactive the totality of fecal coliforms, Salmonella spp. and helminth ova fulfilling with the permissible limits for class A biosolids.

Keywords: mesophilic anaerobic digestion, thermophilic anaerobic digestion, municipal wastewater sludge.

 

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el desempeño del proceso de digestión anaerobia mesofílica y termofílica como una alternativa para la producción de biosólidos. Se utilizó lodo biológico de un reactor UASB de una planta que trata aguas industriales (industria cervecera y papelera) y municipales. Para el sistema mesofílico por lote, la materia orgánica (SV) fue reducida de 60.3% (15.67 g/L) hasta 37.5% (9.67 g/L) con un tiempo de tratamiento de 31 días. El proceso mesofilico presentó una estabilidad en la operación reduciendo el 38% SV con 1.76 Kg SV m3d–1 de la carga orgánica suministrada cumpliendo con el criterio de la reducción de atracción de vectores. Sin embargo, en condiciones mesofílicas, el lodo digerido debe ser post–tratado con un proceso de inactivación de microorganismos patógenos. Los resultados obtenidos demostraron que el proceso en condiciones termofílicas (55° C) es capaz de estabilizar una carga orgánica de 3.9 Kg SV m3d–1 inactivando el total de coliformes fecales, Salmonella spp. y huevos de helmintos cumpliendo con los límites máximos permisibles para biosólidos clase A.

Palabras clave: digestión anaerobia mesofílica, digestión anaerobia termofílica, lodos residuales municipales.

 

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

Acknowledgements

This work was done under the frame of DEPI/DGEST UR513 P project.

 

References

Ahring, B. K., Ibrahim, A. A. and Mladenovska, Z. (2001). Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65°C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure, Water Research. 55(10), 2446–2452.         [ Links ]

Bocher, T.B., Agler, T. M., Garcia, L.M., Beers, R. A., Angenent, T.L. (2008). Anaerobic digestion of secondary residuals from an anaerobic bioreactor at a brewery to enhance bioenergy generation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 35, 321–329.         [ Links ]

Cabirol, N., Rojas–Oropeza, M. and Noyola, A. (2002). Removal of helminth eggs and fecal coliforms by anaerobic thermophilic sludge digestion, Water Science and Technology. 45(10), 269–274.         [ Links ]

Gallert, C. and Winter, J. (1997). Mesophilic and Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source sorted organic wastes: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 48, 405–10.         [ Links ]

Hashimoto, A.G. (1986). Ammonia Inhibition of methanogenesis from cattle wastes. Agricultural Wastes. Vol. 17, pag. 241–261.         [ Links ]Kim, M., Ahn, Y.H. and Speece, R.E. (2002). Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water Research 36, 4369–4385.         [ Links ]

Iza, J. (1995). Control del proceso anaerobio. I Curs d'enginyeria ambiental. Universitat de Lleida. Lleida, 175–201.         [ Links ]

Jiménez, B., Barrios, J.A., Méndez, J.M. and Díaz, J., (2004). Sustainable Sludge Management in Developing Countries. Water Science and Technology 49(10), 251–258.         [ Links ]

Kim, M., Ahn, Y.H. and Speece, R.E. (2002). Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water Research. 36, 4369–4385.         [ Links ]

Krylova, N., Khabiboulline, R., Naumova, R., Nagel, M. (1997). Journal of Chem. Tech. And Biotech. Vol. 79, pag. 99–105.         [ Links ] Kunte, D.P., Yeole, T.Y. and Ranade, D.R. (2000). Inactivation of Vibrio Cholerae during anaerobic digestion of human night solids. Bioresource Technology 75, 149–151.         [ Links ]

Kunte D.P, Yeole T. and Rande D. (2000). Inactivation of Vibrio cholerae during anaerobic digestion of human night soil. Bioresource Technology 75, 149–151.         [ Links ]

Méndez–Contreras, J.M., Atenodoro J., Champion, F.A., Vallejo–Cantú, N.A. and Alvarado–Lassman, A. (2009). Inactivation of high concentration of pathogens in land–applied food industry sludge. Water SA 35(4), 371–377.         [ Links ]

Méndez, J.M., González, C., Alvarado–Lassman A., Alvarado–Kinell, G., Martínez–Delgadillo, S. (2008). Supervivencia de bacterias fecales en lodos residuales deshidratados tratados con amoniaco. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 7(3) 229–235.         [ Links ]

Méndez, J.M., Jiménez, B. and Maya, C. (2004). Disinfection Kinetics of Pathogens in Physicochemical Sludge Treated With Ammonia. Water Science and Technology 50(9), 67–74.         [ Links ]

Morris, D.L., Huges, D.L., Hewit, R.J. and Norrington, J.J. (1986). Pathogens in sewage sludge: (ii) Effects of sludge of stabilization ad treatment processes on viability and infectivity of beef tapeworm eggs. Water Pollution Control 476–481.         [ Links ]

Nidal, M., Grietje, Z., Huub, G. and Lettinga, G. (2004). Anaerobic sewage treatment in a one–stage UASB reactor and a combined UASB–Digester system. Water Research 38, 2348–2358.         [ Links ]

NOM–004–SEMARNAT–2002 (Norma Oficial Mexicana). Protección ambiental Lodos y biosólidos.–Especificaciones y límites máximos permisibles de contaminantes para su aprovechamiento y disposición final. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Agosto 15 de 2003, 14–60, México.         [ Links ]

Noyola, A. and Tinajero, A. (2005). Effect of biological additives and micronutrients on the anaerobic digestion of physicochemical sludge. Water Science and Technology 52 (1–2), 275–281.         [ Links ]

Rojas–Oropeza, M., Cabirol, N., Ortega, S., Castro–Ortiz, L. P. and Noyola, A. (2001). Removal of fecal indicator organisms and parasites (fecal coliforms and helminth eggs) from municipal biologic sludge by anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic digestion. Water Science and Technology 44, 97–101.         [ Links ]

Sanguinetti, G.S., Tortul, C., García, M.C., Ferrer, V., Montangero, A. and Strauss, M. (2005). Investigating helminth eggs and Salmonella sp. in stabilization ponds treating septage. Water Science and Technology 51(12), 239–247.         [ Links ]

Schwartzbrod, J. and Banas, S. (2003). Parasite contamination of liquid sludge from urban wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology 47(3), 163–166.         [ Links ]

Tapana, C. Krishna R.P. (2000). Anaerobic thermophilic /mesophilic dual–stage sludge treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering 123 (9) 796–801.         [ Links ]

US Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). A guide to the biosolids risk assessments EPA part 503 rule, Washington, D. C.         [ Links ]

Young–Chae, S., Sang–Jo, K. and Jung–Hui, W. (2004). Mesophilic and Thermophilic temperature co–phase anaerobic digestion compared with single–stage mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Research 38, 1653–1662.         [ Links ]

Zeeman, G., Wiegant, W.M., Koster–Treffers, M.E., Lettinga, G. (1985). The influence of total ammonia concentration on the thermophilic digestion of cow manure. Agricultural Wastes 14, 19–35.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons