SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número2El Estudio Panel México 2006: midiendo el cambio de opiniones durante la campaña presidencialAuditoría de la democracia: México 2006 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Política y gobierno

versão impressa ISSN 1665-2037

Polít. gob vol.14 no.2 Ciudad de México Jul./Dez. 2007

 

Notas de investigación

Contextos institucionales y decisiones individuales: Cuarta Encuesta Nacional CIDE-CSES

Institutional Contexts and Individual Decisions: Fourth National CIDE-CSES Survey

Ulises Beltrán* 

* Profesor afiliado de la División de de Estudios Políticos en el Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Carretera México-Toluca 3655, Col. Lomas de Santa Fe, C.P. 01210, México D.F. Correo electrónico: ulises.beltrán@cide.edu.


Resumen:

Esta nota de investigación describe la cuarta encuesta electoral mexicana (2006) del proyecto CIDE-CSES (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas y el Comparative Study of Electoral Systems), la más reciente de una serie que incluye las cuarto elecciones federales desde 1997. El proyecto intenta comprender los efectos de los arreglos institucionales sobre el comportamiento electoral y crear series para estudios diacrónicos. Sus hallazgos preliminares sugieren que la desconfianza en el sistema electoral observada en 2006 aparece, en perspectiva comparada, relacionada con la madurez del sistema electoral mexicano. Asimismo, la identidad partidista aparece relacionada con la longevidad de los partidos y con la madurez del sistema. La competencia en México ha aumentado el interés y la información sobre política de los votantes.

Palabras clave: análisis comparativo; CSES; encuestas; satisfacción con la democracia; México; elección 2006

Abstract:

This research note describes the fourth Mexican electoral survey (2006) undertaken by CIDE-CSES (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas) as part of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). The CIDE-CSES project 2006 studies the impact of institutional arrangements on electoral behavior and is part of a larger effort that includes similar surveys of all Mexican federal elections since 1997. Its preliminary results suggest that, in comparative perspective, distrust of the 2006 election is related to the age of the Mexican electoral system. Similarly, it points out that partisan affiliation appears related to party system age. Electoral competition also has increased interest in and information about politics in Mexico.

Key words: comparative analysis; CSES; surveys; satisfaction with democracy; Mexico; 2006 election

Texto completo disponible sólo en PDF

Referencias bibliográficas

Álvarez, Mike; Cheibub, José Antonio; Limogi, Fernando y Przeworski, Adam (1996), “Classifying Political Regimes”, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 31, núm. 2, pp. 3-36. [ Links ]

Beltrán, Ulises (2000), “Factores de ponderación del voto retrospectivo”, Política y Gobierno, vol. VII núm. 2, pp. 425-442. [ Links ]

______ (2003), “Venciendo la incertidumbre: el voto retrospectivo en la elección presidencial de 2000 en México”, Política y Gobierno, vol. X, núm. 2, pp. 325-358. [ Links ]

Borre, Ole (1984), “Critical Electoral Change in Scandinavia”, en Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanigan, y Paul Allen Beck, (eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [ Links ]

Buendía, Jorge (2004), “The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991-2000”, en Kevin J. Middlebrook (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in México, Londres y La Jolla, Institute of Latin American Studies of the University of London y Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies of the University of California at San Diego. [ Links ]

Cinta, Alberto E. (1999), “Uncertainty and Electoral Behavior in Mexico in the 1997 Congressional Elections”, en Jorge Domínguez y Alejandro Poiré, (eds.), Towards Mexico’s Democratization, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 174-202. [ Links ]

Clarke, Harold y Whitely, Paul (1990), “Perceptions of Macroeconomic Performance, Government Support and Conservative Party Strength in Britain”, European Journal of Political Research, núm. 18, pp. 97-120. [ Links ]

Colomer, Josep M. (2001), Political Institutions, Nueva York, Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

Conover, Pamela Johnston; Feldman, Stanley y Knight, Kathleen (1996), “Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations”, Journal of Politics, núm. 48 (agosto), pp. 565-88. [ Links ]

Dalton, Russell J. (1988), Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France, Chatham, Chatham House Publishers. [ Links ]

______, Flanagan, Scott y Allen Beck, Paul (eds.) (1984), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [ Links ]

Delli Carpini, Michael X. y Keeter, Scout (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters, New Haven, Yale Univerity Press. [ Links ]

Dix, Robert H. (1989), “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America”, Comparative Politics, núm. 22, pp. 23-38. [ Links ]

Domínguez, Jorge I. y Alejandro Poiré (1999), Toward Mexico’s Democratization. Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, Nueva York y Londres, Routledge. [ Links ]

______ y Lawson, Chappell (eds.) (2004), Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press. [ Links ]

Duch, Raymond M. (2001), “A Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies”, American Political Science Review, vol. 95, núm. 4, 895-910. [ Links ]

Franklin, Mark; Mackie, Tom; Valen, Henry et al. (1992), Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

Freedom House (1972-1999) (2007), Freedom House, 20 marzo 2007, www.freedomhouse.org . [ Links ]

Gasiorowski, Mark J. (1996), “An Overview of the Political Regime Change Dataset”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 10, núm. 1, pp. 33-51. [ Links ]

Huntington, Samuel (1991), The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press. [ Links ]

Inglehart, Ronald (1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [ Links ]

Klingemann, H. D., y Wattenberg, Martin (1992), “Decaying versus Developing Party Systems: A Comparison of Party Images in the United States and West Germany”, British Journal of Political Science, núm. 22, pp. 131-49. [ Links ]

Krause, George A. (1997), “Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations”, American Journal of Political Science, núm. 41 (octubre), pp. 170-200. [ Links ]

Lipset, Seymour M. y Rokkan, Stein (eds.) (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Nueva York, Free Press. [ Links ]

Lawson, Chappell (1999), “Why Cárdenas Won: The 1997 Elections in Mexico City” en Jorge I. Domínguez y Alejandro Poiré (eds.), Toward Mexico’s Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 147-173. [ Links ]

Moreno, Alejandro (2003), El votante mexicano. Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México. [ Links ]

Power, Timothy J. y Gasiorowski, Mark J. (1997), “Institutional Design and Democratic Consolidation in the Third World”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 123-155. [ Links ]

Rokkan, Stein et al. (1970), Citizens, Elections, Parties; Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, Nueva York, McKay. [ Links ]

Rose, Richard (1982), The Territorial Dimension in Politics, Chatham, Chatham House. [ Links ]

Sarsfield, Rodolfo y Echegaray, Fabián (2005), “Opening the Black Box: How Satisfaction with Democracy and its Perceived Efficacy Affect Regime Preference in Latin America”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 18, núm. 2, pp. 153-173. [ Links ]

Shively, Phillip W. (2006), “Democratic Design: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Project”, Encuesta Nacional Electoral CIDE-CSES. CIDE-BGC [CD-ROM]. [ Links ]

Thomassen, Jacques (chair); Rosenstone, Steven J.; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Curtice, John (1994), “The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems”. A Conference Sponsored by The International Committee for Research into Elections and Representative Democracy (ICORE), agosto 19-20, Berlín, Alemania. Disponible en: [formato HTML] http://cses.org/plancom/module1/stimulus.htm [consulta: 11 marzo 2007]. [ Links ]

Conference Steering Committee (1994), Jacques Thomassen (chair), University of Twente, Steven J. Rosenstone, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Fur Sozialforschung, John Curtice, University of Strathclyde, febrero, 19, http://cses.org/plancom/module1/stimulus.htmLinks ]

Zaller, John R. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

Recibido: Marzo de 2007

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons