SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.93 número3Cirugía de reconstrucción de válvula aórtica con técnica de Ozaki: resultados iniciales en un centro de referenciaCarga económica de la hipercolesterolemia en población con alto riesgo cardiovascular en México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos de cardiología de México

versión On-line ISSN 1665-1731versión impresa ISSN 1405-9940

Arch. Cardiol. Méx. vol.93 no.3 Ciudad de México jul./sep. 2023  Epub 04-Sep-2023

https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000161 

Basic and clinical Research

Clinical impact of the infrapatellar location in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients

Impacto clínico de la localización infrapatelar en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica sintomática

Juan G. Chiabrando1  * 

Fernando D. Garagoli2 

Maria M. Abraham-Foscolo2 

Giuliana Corna2 

Maria de los Milagros-Fleitas2 

Juan Valle-Raleigh1 

Horacio A. Medina-de-Chazal1 

Daniel H. Berrocal1 

Jose M. Rabellino3 

Ignacio M. Bluro2 

1Department of Interventional Cardiology

2Department of Cardiology

3Department of Digital Angiography. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina


Abstract

Background:

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently affects multiple segments of the limbs. Contradictory data have reported worse prognosis in aortoiliac lesions, nevertheless, diabetes and chronic limb ischemia frequently affects the infrapatellar territory. Our aim was to assess the impact of infrapatellar disease in cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study at a university hospital in Argentina. Electronic health records were retrospectively reviewed including symptomatic PAD patients requiring revascularization. A multivariable regression model was performed to account for confounders. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalizations due to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and major amputation events between infrapatellar and suprapatellar patients. Minor amputation events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were secondary endpoints.

Results:

From January 2014 through July 2020, a total of 309 patients were included in the analysis. 151 patients had suprapatellar disease, and 158 had infrapatellar disease. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 35 patients (22.2%) in the infrapatellar patients and 18 patients (11.9%) in the suprapatellar patients (HR = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Both components of the primary outcomes occurred more frequently in infrapatellar patients. Minor amputation events were more prevalent in infrapatellar patients (HR = 5.09; 95% CI = [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010). Death, MI, stroke, and MACE events were not different among groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Infrapatellar disease was an independent factor for increased hospitalization of CLTI, major and minor amputations events, compared to suprapatellar disease in symptomatic revascularized PAD patients.

Keywords Peripheral artery disease; Infrapatellar; Claudication; Chronic limb-threatening ischemia; Acute ischemia

Resumen

Objetivo:

La enfermedad vascular periférica (EVP) afecta generalmente múltiples segmentos de los miembros. Existe información contradictoria con respecto al pronóstico de pacientes con enfermedad aortoilíaca, sin embargo, la diabetes y la enfermedad critica de miembros inferiores habitualmente afecta el territorio infrapatelar. Nuestro objetivo es determinar el impacto de la afectación infrapatelar en eventos cardiovasculares.

Métodos:

Estudio retrospectivo, observacional en un hospital universitario de Argentina. Se revisó la historia clínica electrónica de pacientes con EVP con requerimiento de revascularización. Se generó un modelo de regresión multivariado incluyendo variables clínicamente relevantes. El punto final primario fue un combinado de hospitalización por isquemia crítica y amputaciones mayores entre pacientes con afectación infrapatelar y suprapatelar. Amputaciones menores, muerte por todas las causas, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) y un combinado de eventos cardiovasculares (MACE) fueron los puntos secundarios.

Resultados:

Se reclutó un total de 309 pacientes desde enero de 2014 hasta julio de 2020. 151 pacientes presentaron enfermedad suprapatelar y 158 infrapatelar. El punto final primario ocurrió en 35 pacientes (22.2%) en el grupo infrapatelar y en 18 pacientes (11.9%) en suprapatelares (HR 2.16; intervalo de confianza 95% [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Ambos componentes ocurrieron con mayor frecuencia en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar. Los eventos de amputación menor fueron mas prevalentes en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar (HR 5.09; IC95% [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010) La mortalidad por todas las causas, IAM, ACV y MACE no fueron diferentes entre los grupos (p > 0.05).

Conclusión:

La enfermedad infrapatelar fue un factor independiente para mayor riesgo de hospitalización por isquemia critica, amputación mayor y menor comparado con pacientes con afectación suprapatelar en EVP sintomática revascularizada.

Palabras clave Enfermedad vascular periférica; Infrapatelar; Claudicación intermitente; Isquemia crítica; Isquemia aguda

Introduction

Atherosclerotic disease frequently affects the lower extremities arteries, affecting 10% in US adults older than 55 years old1. The symptoms related to atherosclerotic narrowing of the aorta or lower extremity arteries depend on the location and severity of disease, as muscle function is impaired. Indeed, reduced muscle perfusion, with subsequent impaired mitochondrial activity, increased muscle fat infiltration and fibrosis are pathogenic mechanisms related to worse symptoms2,3.

In addition to difference in size, histological differences arise between suprapatellar and infrapatellar arteries. Proximal arteries have a predominance of elastic component in the media, and progressively, muscular fibers predominate in more distal arteries media. Moreover, differences in shear stress according to the topography may impair differences in endothelial function4.

The previous studies have found contradictive results regarding the location of the arterial narrowing or occlusion, as proximal (aortoiliac) PAD compared with those with more distal PAD had a poorer general prognosis, independent of risk factors and comorbidities5, nevertheless, patients with diabetes or with end-stage kidney disease generally present with more distal disease, which are known risk factors of worse outcomes6,7. These clinical characteristics may be responsible for a worse clinical prognosis, behaving like confounders.

On the other hand, revascularization of infrapatellar stenosis may be more challenging due to a more diffuse, calcified disease, requiring generally more revascularization events compared to suprapatellar stenosis8-10.

Objective

Our aim was to account for the impact in prognosis of infrapatellar stenosis compared to suprapatellar in symptomatic PAD patients at a university hospital in Argentina.

Methods

Study design

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study designed and reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement11.

Settings

The study was undertaken at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, which is a university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We retrospectively queried a database of adult patients who required revascularization due to symptomatic PAD from January 2014 to June 2020. The follow-up was considered from the first revascularization event to last medical contact or death of the patients.

Participants

Patients aged over 18 years at our institution and diagnosed with symptomatic PAD with further revascularization (either surgical or percutaneous) were included in the analysis. Iatrogenic, inflammatory or traumatic causes of revascularization events were excluded from the analysis, as atherosclerotic disease was the main focus of the analysis.

Variables

Symptomatic PAD was defined as a > 70% narrowing of the arteries of the limbs that produced pain and/or tissue loss (according to the clinical presentation). The stenoses locations were secondarily grouped into 3 anatomical levels: aorto-iliac arteries, femoral-popliteal arteries, and infrapatellar arteries. Furthermore, both aortoiliac and femoropopliteal stenosis were considered suprapatellar lesions. Infrapatellar stenosis was considered below the knee stenosis. Each patient could have 1 or more levels affected, with coexisting lesions in a same leg or in the other leg. Those patients with infrapatellar disease (irrespective of the presence of suprapatellar disease) were considered in the infrapatellar group. No distinction was made regarding the laterality of the lesion.

The risk factors, comorbidities, and treatments at the time of the angiography were collected from the medical charts, with baseline variables defined as follows: Diabetes was defined by a fasting blood glucose > 7 mmol/L at admission or the use of any oral antidiabetic agent and/or insulin. Hyperlipidemia was defined according to the documented patient's history and/or a fasting blood cholesterol > 240 mg/dL at admission. Patients were considered hypertensive if they took any antihypertensive drug. and/or if their average systolic blood pressure exceeded 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure exceeded 90 mmHg. The previous myocardial infarction (MI) was defined as any coronary ischemic event reported in the medical chart with requirement of coronary revascularization. The previous HF event was defined according to the documented medical history of admissions due to volume overload with requirements of intravenous diuretics.

Clinically, patients may present with intermittent claudication (IC), defined as a reproducible discomfort of the muscles of the legs induced by exercise and relieved with rest. Based on the timing of the inciting event, patients with threatened limbs are classified as acute ischemia (AI) (defined as symptoms that started in < 2 weeks) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (defined as those symptoms that persisted > 2 weeks)12.

Outcomes

The primary outcome of interest was to compare the composite of hospitalizations due to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and major amputation events (defined as supramalleolar amputations) between infrapatellar and suprapatellar PAD patients12. CTLI hospitalizations were defined as hospital admissions due to the presence of PAD in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or lower limb ulceration beyond > 2 weeks of duration13. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary endpoint, death, minor amputation events (i.e., distal to the forefoot), spontaneous MI events (defined by the fourth MI universal definition)14, and stroke (either ischemic - defined as brain ischemia due to thrombosis, embolism, or systemic hypoperfusion - or hemorrhagic due to intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage)15. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, MI, and stroke.

Statistics

Data were tested for deviation from Gaussian distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, non-normally distributed continuous variables by median and interquartile range (IQR) in parentheses. Discrete variables are presented as number and percentages in parentheses. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher exact test when appropriate. Continuous variables were compared with t-test or Mann Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Incidence risk ratios (IRR) are provided for all clinical endpoints in the analysis. Those variables that a priori were thought to be clinically relevant were included a univariable and in a multivariable logistic regression model. Cumulative incidence regarding the primary outcome was expressed by a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using the log-rank test. Hazards ratios were estimated by means of Cox regression analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed by R v3.5.2 (R foundation for computational sciences, Vienna, Austria).

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by our local internal review board. Patient informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of our study. Only members of the clinical team had access to routinely collected data, which were anonymized at the point of analysis. Our study is compliant with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki16.

Results

Patient characteristics

From January 2014 through July 2020, a total of 309 patients were included in the analysis after a thorough chart review of patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The median follow up was 1.87 years IQR (0.72-3.67 years). The mean age in our overall cohort was 71.84 ± 11.17 years old. About 64.7% were male and 30.5% were diabetic. IC was the most frequent clinical presentation (56%), followed by CLTI (29.4%) and AI (14.2%). Surgical revascularization was pursued in only 16.9% of the patients.

Figure 1 Study flow chart. 

We further classified the patients regarding the location of the PAD. 97 (31.3%) patients had aortoiliac disease, 230 (74.4%) femoropopliteal, and 158 (51.1%) infrapatellar disease. These disease topographies frequently coexisted (Fig. 2). The baseline characteristics of the patients are found in table 1. Of our interest, 151 patients had suprapatellar disease, and 158 had infrapatellar disease. Infrapatellar disease patients had more prevalence of diabetes mellitus (38.2% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.05) and lower prevalence of tobacco consumption (13.9% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.05). Moreover, they were more likely to present with CLTI (38.6% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.05) (and thus higher Rutherford classification) and less likely to present with AI events (8.9% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.05).

Figure 2 Peripheral artery disease distribution. Absolute and percentage numbers are provided. 

Table 1 Demographic difference in suprapatellar and infrapatellar groups 

Variables Overall (n = 309) Suprapatellar (n = 151) Infrapatellar (n = 158) p-value
Baseline characteristics
Age mean ± SD 71.84 ± 11.17 70.89 ± 11.30 72.76 ± 11.00 0.141
BMI mean ± SD 27.40 ± 5.07 26.99 ± 5.03 27.80 ± 5.09 0.171
Male (%) 200 (64.7) 97 (64.2) 103 (65.2) 0.955
Hypertension (%) 257 (83.2) 123 (81.5) 134 (84.8) 0.525
Diabetes mellitus (%) 94 (30.5) 34 (22.5) 60 (38.2) 0.004
Dyslipidemia (%) 202 (65.8) 103 (68.2) 99 (63.5) 0.449
Active tobacco consumption (%) 68 (22.0) 46 (30.5) 22 (13.9) 0.001
Chronic renal Injury (%) 60 (19.6) 28 (18.8) 32 (20.4) 0.837
Prev. myocardial infarction (%) 68 (22.2) 32 (21.6) 36 (22.8) 0.915
Prev. heart failure (%) 34 (11.0) 13 (8.6) 21 (13.4) 0.249
Stroke (%) 29 (9.4) 14 (9.3) 15 (9.6) 1
Atrial fibrillation (%) 52 (16.9) 19 (12.7) 33 (20.9) 0.076
Laboratory
Hematocrit mean ± SD 37.21 ± 5.59 37.62 ± 5.41 36.81 ± 5.75 0.204
Creatinine median (IQR) 0.97 (0.76-1.2) 0.96 (0.75-1.18) 1 (0.78-1.30) 0.339
Clinical presentation
Intermittent claudication (%) 173 (56.0) 90 (59.6) 83 (52.5) 0.256
CLTI (%) 91 (29.4) 30 (19.9) 61 (38.6) 0.001
Acute ischemia (%) 44 (14.2) 30 (19.9) 14 (8.9) 0.009
Rutherford #4 (%) 74 (23.9) 44 (29.1) 30 (19.0) 0.050
Rutherford #5 (%) 58 (18.8) 11 (7.3) 47 (29.7) 0.001
Rutherford #6 (%) 7 (2.3) 2 (1.3) 5 (3.2) 0.481
Surgical revascularization (%) 52 (16.9) 31 (20.7) 21 (13.4) 0.121
Severe LVEF (%) 9 (3.1) 2 (1.4) 7 (4.6) 0.2

CLTI: chronic limb threatening ischemia; IQR: interquartile range; LVEF: left ventricle ejection fraction.

Clinical endpoints

The primary composite of hospitalization of CLTI events and major amputation occurred in 35 patients (22.2%) in the infrapatellar patients and 18 patients (11.9%) in the suprapatellar patients (HR = 2.16 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-3.82; p = 0.008) (Table 2 and Fig. 3).

Table 2 Clinical endpoints 

Variables Suprapatellar (n = 151) Infrapatellar (n = 158) HR (95% CI) p-value
Patients with events (%) IRR (per 100 person year) Patients with events (%) IRR (per 100 person year)
Primary outcome
Composite of hospitalization of CLTI and major amputations (%) 18 (11.9) 6.4 35 (22.2) 11.8 2.16 (1.22-3.82) 0.008
Secondary outcomes
Hospitalization of CLTI (%) 14 (9.3) 4.9 26 (16.5) 8.8 2.16 (1.12-4.15) 0.021
Major amputation (%) 5 (3.3) 1.8 16 (10.1) 5.4 3.15 (1.15-8.6) 0.025
Death (%) 23 (15.2) 8.1 25 (15.8) 8.5 1.3 (0.73-2.29) 0.445
Non-Fatal MI (%) 7 (4.6) 2.5 7 (4.4) 2.4 1.31 (0.44-3.95) 0.627
Non-Fatal Stroke (%) 4 (2.6) 1.4 5 (3.2) 1.7 1.43 (0.38-5.37) 0.595
MACE (%) 30 (19.9) 10.6 36 (22.8) 12.2 1.43 (0.87-2.35) 0.154
Minor amputation (%) 3 (2.0) 1.1 15 (9.5) 5.1 5.09 (1.47-17.6) 0.010

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; CLTI: chronic limb threatening ischemia; HR: Hazard ratio; IRR: Incidence risk ratio; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular outcomes; MI: myocardial infarction.

Figure 3 Cumulative incidence of the composite primary outcome. 

Event rates for both components of the primary outcomes were increased in the infrapatellar patients. Of the infrapatellar patients, 26 (16.5%) were hospitalized due to CLTI, as compared with 14 (9.3%) in the suprapatellar group (HR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.12-4.15; p = 0.021). Major amputation events occurred in 16 patients (10.1%) with infrapatellar disease and in 5 patients (3.3%) with suprapatellar disease (HR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.15-8.6; p = 0.025) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Cumulative incidence of both chronic limb threatening ischemia hospitalizations and major amputation events. 

Death from all causes occurred in 25 patients (15.8%) with infrapatellar disease and in 23 patients (15.2%) with suprapatellar disease (HR = 1.3; 95% CI = 0.73-2.29; p = 0.445). Non-fatal MI occurred in 7 patients (4.4%) in the infrapatellar group and 7 patients (4.6%) (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 0.44-3.95; p = 0.627). Non-fatal stroke occurred in 5 patients (3.2%) in the infrapatellar group as compared to 4 patients (2.6%) in the suprapatellar group (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.38-5.37; p = 0.595). MACE events occurred in 36 patients (22.8%) in the infrapatellar group as compared to 30 patients (19.9%) in the suprapatellar group (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.87-2.35; p = 0.154).

Minor amputation events occurred more frequently in the infrapatellar group (15 [9.5%]) than in the suprapatellar group (3 [2%]) (HR = 5.09; 95% CI = 1.47-17.6; p = 0.010).

After adjusting for diabetes, tobacco consumption, age, male sex, CLTI and AI, hematocrit, creatinine serum levels at presentation and surgical revascularization, infrapatellar PAD was independently associated with an increased risk for the primary composite endpoint (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = [1.05-4.81]; p = 0.038) (Table 3). We further performed a sensitivity multivariate regression model in which those with pure suprapatellar PAD was included, to compare pure infrapatellar and suprapatellar disease, finding still a worse prognosis in those with infrapatellar disease (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = [1-5.79]; p = 0.030) (Table 4).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate, regarding the primary composite event 

Variable Univariate regression Multivariate regression
ß OR CI95 p-value ß OR CI95 p-value
Infrapatellar 0.74 2.1 1.15-3.98 0.019 0.80 2.22 1.05-4.81 0.038
Diabetes 0.49 1.64 0.88-3 0.116 0.02 1.02 0.46-2.20 0.944
Tobacco consumption −0.14 0.87 0.37-1.95 0.742 0.56 1.75 0.61-4.88 0.285
Male sex −0.51 0.6 0.33-1.1 0.096 −0.95 0.39 0.17-0.83 0.016
Age −0.02 0.98 0.95-1 0.086 −0.03 0.97 0.94-1 0.068
CLTI events 1.43 4.17 2.26-7.78 < 0.001 1.27 3.57 1.65-7.9 0.001
AI events −0.31 0.73 0.27-1.72 0.506 0.75 2.12 0.65-6.39 0.188
Hematocrit −0.13 0.88 0.83-0.92 < 0.001 −0.08 0.92 0.86-0.98 0.013
Creatinine 0.28 1.33 1.1-1.63 0.004 0.18 1.20 0.96-1.54 0.118
Surgical revascularization 0.03 1 0.43-2.12 0.993 −0.20 0.82 0.31-1.97 0.666

AI: acute ischemia; CI: confidence interval; CLTI: chronic limb threatening ischemia; OR: odds ratio.

Table 4 Multivariate, regarding the primary composite event 

Variable Multivariate regression
ß OR CI95 p-value
Infrapatellar 0.84 2.33 1.00-5.79 0.030
Diabetes 0.09 1.09 0.48-2.38 0.814
Tobacco consumption 0.52 1.68 0.59-4.72 0.322
Male sex −0.94 0.39 0.17-0.83 0.017
Age −0.03 0.97 0.94-1 0.068
CLTI events 1.30 3.68 1.69-8.2 0.001
AI events 0.77 2.16 0.66-6.49 0.176
Hematocrit −0.08 0.92 0.86-0.98 0.015
Creatinine 0.18 1.20 0.96-1.54 0.122
Surgical revascularization −0.20 0.81 0.31-1.97 0.655
Pure suprapatellar affection 0.35 1.43 0.50-4.42 0.514

AI: acute ischemia; CI: confidence interval; CLTI: chronic limb threatening ischemia; OR: odds ratio.

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study, the risk of developing the primary outcome (a composite of hospitalization of CLTI events and major amputations) was higher in the infrapatellar group than in the suprapatellar group. This higher risk was independent of baseline covariates that were thought to be clinically relevant in the prognosis of the patients and that were thought to confound the results. Further, we found an increased risk of developing minor amputation events in the infrapatellar group. On the other hand, risk of death, MI, stroke, or MACE was not different between both groups.

PAD is a worldwide pathology, affecting millions of patients with a yearly increasing incidence17,18. Understanding prognostic factors is of paramount importance to provide better pharmacological and revascularization procedures. The previous classifications systems have made focus in the severity of the symptoms (such as Rutherford and Fontaine classification)19, as well as the complexity of the lesions (such as the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] classification)20, with few mentions to the location of the disease itself. Aboyan et al. reported a poorer general prognosis of patients with proximal (aortoiliac) PAD compared with those with more distal PAD, independent of risk factors and comorbidities5. Our data collides with these results, but differences in sample population may explain these conflicting data. We selected a very comorbid population, as for inclusion criteria, the patients had to have symptomatic revascularization events to be considered for analysis. We found that frequently PAD affects multiple territories, but those patients with infrapatellar disease had worse prognosis than those with suprapatellar compromise.

Another significant mention is the rate of major amputations in our population. Our rates of major amputations are higher than in previous reports21,22. These differences may be explained by our older and more comorbid (i.e., higher prevalence of diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and previous stroke) population. In fact, we believe that our data reflects the actual condition of vascular patients in those countries in which an increasing aging population with a larger life expectancy.

Minor amputations events were also more prevalent in the infrapatellar disease group. Considered as a therapeutic goal, better delimitation of ulcer wounds reflect an ability to control diffuse ischemia in the ankles and feet. This improvement in delimitation may be due to the advances done in the endovascular revascularization technology that shifted the paradigm towards an endovascular first therapy, performing surgical procedures in those patients in which endovascular therapy failed. In our study, we have seen this shift as most of the revascularization procedures has been done percutaneously (13% in infrapatellar PAD and 20.7% in suprapatellar PAD).

Mortality, MI, and stroke (and subsequently MACE events) were similar in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar patients. Our event rates regarding these outcomes are in concord with previous literature21, nevertheless Aboyan et al. found higher mortality and cardiovascular events in proximal aortoiliac lesions5.

Diabetes (associated with a more advanced PAD)18,23 and CLTI frequently affect infrapatellar regions, thereby impairing worse prognosis in infrapatellar disease patients, independently from the location disease. A 3-fold increase in major amputation events in diabetic patients may be in fact due to a macro and microvascular damage in PAD patients24. Due to these confounding factors (among others), we performed a multivariate regression analysis to account for these covariates, and found impact of infrapatellar disease independently of the covariates included in the model.

Other hypothesis may explain these findings. First, infrapatellar disease may have a more prolonged course to become symptomatic, with patients consulting upon limb ulceration emerge, making the prognosis in these patients poorer. On the other hand, proximal aortoiliac lesions generally impair intermittent claudication symptoms, which frequently impair quality of life to the patients, warranting a prompt medical consult. Second, revascularization of infrapatellar stenosis may be more challenging due to smaller vessel size, increased prevalence of chronic occlusions, more calcified stenosis, requiring more aggressive therapies compared to suprapatellar disease. Third, we found an increased prevalence of acute ischemia in the suprapatellar population. These patients generally have a worse prognosis that IC patients, and the risk increases by delay in revascularization. Due to the retrospective nature of our work, we could not account feasibly the time to reperfusion in these patients. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that clinical presentation (i.e., CLTI and acute ischemia) may impair worse prognosis, this is the reason which we included acute ischemia and CLTI in the multivariate regression analysis to account for this factor.

Limitations

The retrospective nature of our study which may impair unknown bias that is responsible for the findings and may impair the external validity of the data, such as improvement in the Rutherford classification or improvement in wound care. Second, the small sample size and small number of events limits the number of variables which can be fitted in the multivariate model, with the risk of eventual over fitting of the model. Third, we could not account for the data which are included in the recent WIFI classification (such as wound characteristics, persistent infection, and ongoing ischemia) nor the number of vessels affected in the infrapatellar region25. Fourth, we used broad inclusion and exclusion criteria, including patients with diverse clinical presentation (i.e., intermittent claudication, chronic threatening limb ischemia, and acute ischemia) with diverse clinical evolution, which may affect the interpretation of our findings. Further research in these diverse clinical presentations would yield interesting information regarding the impact of infrapatellar disease.

Conclusions

Among patients with symptomatic revascularize PAD, those with infrapatellar lesions had an increased risk of hospitalization due to CLTI events, major and minor amputation compared with those with suprapatellar lesions.

References

1. Pande RL, Perlstein TS, Beckman JA, Creager MA. Secondary prevention and mortality in peripheral artery disease:national health and nutrition examination study, 1999 to 2004. Circulation. 2011;124:17-23. [ Links ]

2. McDermott MM, Ferrucci L, Gonzalez-Freire M, Kosmac K, Leeuwenburgh C, Peterson CA, et al. Skeletal muscle pathology in peripheral artery disease:a brief review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:2577-85. [ Links ]

3. Pizzimenti M, Meyer A, Charles AL, Giannini M, ChakféN, Lejay A, et al. Sarcopenia and peripheral arterial disease:a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:866-86. [ Links ]

4. Aboyans V, Lacroix P, Criqui MH. Large and small vessels atherosclerosis:similarities and differences. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;50:112-25. [ Links ]

5. Aboyans V, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Salazar J, Criqui MH, Laskar M. The general prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease differs according to the disease localization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:898-903. [ Links ]

6. Farber A, Eberhardt RT. The current state of critical limb Ischemia:a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:1070-77. [ Links ]

7. Mills JL Sr., Conte MS, Armstrong DG, Pomposelli FB, Schanzer A, Sidawy AN, et al. The society for vascular surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system:risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:220-2.e1-2. [ Links ]

8. Schmidt A, Bakker OJ, Bausback Y, Scheinert D. The tibiopedal retrograde vascular access for challenging popliteal and below-the-knee chronic total occlusions:literature review and description of the technique. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017;58:371-82. [ Links ]

9. Meyer A, Schinz K, Lang W, Schmid A, Regus S, Rother U. Outcomes and Influence of the pedal arch in below-the-knee angioplasty in patients with end-stage renal disease and critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;35:121-9. [ Links ]

10. Almasri J, Adusumalli J, Asi N, Lakis S, Alsawas M, Prokop LJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:S110-9. [ Links ]

11. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806-8. [ Links ]

12. Jaff MR, White CJ, Hiatt WR, Fowkes GR, Dormandy J, Razavi M, et al. An update on methods for revascularization and expansion of the TASC lesion classification to include below-the-knee arteries:a supplement to the inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22:663-77. [ Links ]

13. Patel MR, Conte MS, Cutlip DE, Dib N, Geraghty P, Gray W, et al. Evaluation and treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease:consensus definitions from peripheral academic research consortium (PARC). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:931-41. [ Links ]

14. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, White JV, Dick F, Wang S, et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:S1-109.e33. [ Links ]

15. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke:2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke:a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2019;50:e344-418. [ Links ]

16. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki:ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191-4. [ Links ]

17. Nehler MR, Duval S, Diao L, Annex BH, Hiatt WR, Rogers K, et al. Epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia in an insured national population. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:686-95.e2. [ Links ]

18. Criqui MH, Aboyans V. Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:1509-26. [ Links ]

19. Hardman RL, Jazaeri O, Yi J, Smith M, Gupta R. Overview of classification systems in peripheral artery disease. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31:378-88. [ Links ]

20. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45 Suppl S:S5-67. [ Links ]

21. Long CA, Mulder H, Fowkes FR, Baumgartner I, Berger JS, Katona BG, et al. Incidence and factors associated with major amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease:insights from the EUCLID trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13:e006399. [ Links ]

22. Gabel J, Jabo B, Patel S, Kiang S, Bianchi C, Chiriano J, et al. Analysis of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation in the vascular quality initiative. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:75-82. [ Links ]

23. Wang CC, Blomster JI, Heizer G, Berger JS, Baumgartner I, Fowkes FG, et al. Cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease:the EUCLID trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3274-84. [ Links ]

24. Beckman JA, Duncan MS, Damrauer SM, Wells QS, Barnett JV, Wasserman DH, et al. Microvascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and amputation. Circulation. 2019;140:449-58. [ Links ]

25. Weaver ML, Hicks CW, Canner JK, Sherman RL, Hines KF, Mathioudakis N, et al. The society for vascular surgery wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) classification system predicts wound healing better than direct angiosome perfusion in diabetic foot wounds. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1473-81. [ Links ]

FundingNone.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained approval from the Ethics Committee for analysis and publication of routinely acquired clinical data and informed consent was not required for this retrospective observational study.

Received: May 21, 2022; Accepted: November 15, 2022

* Correspondence: Juan G. Chiabrando Email: juan.chiabrando@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

Conflicts of interest

None.

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license