SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número4Un método de Discretización Supervisada para Variables Cuantitativas y Cualitativas Ordenadas índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Computación y Sistemas

versão On-line ISSN 2007-9737versão impressa ISSN 1405-5546

Comp. y Sist. vol.9 no.4 Ciudad de México Abr./Jun. 2006

 

Artículos

 

A Reactive Location Routing Algorithm with Cluster–Based Flooding for Inter–Vehicle Communication

 

Un Algoritmo de Enrutamiento de localización Reactivo con Diseminación Basada en Grupos para Comunicación Inter–Vehicular

 

Raúl Aquino S. and Arthur Edwards B.

 

Facultad de Telemática
Universidad de Colima
C. P. 28040, Colima, Colima, México

aquinor@ucol.mx, arted@ucol.mx

 

Article received on January 22, 2005; accepted on March 10, 2006

 

Abstract

In this paper, we present a reactive location routing algorithm with cluster–based flooding for inter–vehicle communication. We consider a motorway environment with associated high mobility and compare position–based and non–position–based routing strategies, along with a limiting function for flooding mechanisms in reactive ad–hoc protocols. The performance of Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Ad–Hoc On–demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) for non–positional and Location Routing Algorithm with Cluster–Based Flooding (LORA_CBF) for positional algorithms is considered. First, for small–scale networks, our research validates our proposed simulation model with the results of a test bed and the results of mathematical analysis. Then, for large–scale networks, we use simulations to compare our model with both the AODV and DSR reactive routing algorithms. Finally, we use a microscopic traffic model, developed in OPNET, to ascertain the mobility of 250 vehicles on a motorway with regards to average Route Discovery (RD) time, End–to–End Delay (EED), Routing Load, Routing Overhead, Overhead, and Delivery Ratio.

Keywords: Unicast routing, multi–hop wireless networks, inter–vehicular data exchange, ad–hoc networks, location routing algorithm with cluster–based flooding.

 

Resumen

En este trabajo, presentamos un algoritmo de enrutamiento reactivo por posición basado en grupos para comunicación Inter.–vehicular. También se ha estimado un escenario automovilístico de alta velocidad (autopista), y se ha comparado estrategias de enrutamiento reactivas basadas en posición y no–posición, además de un mecanismo de reducción de diseminación de información en protocolos ad–hoc reactivos. El rendimiento de los algoritmos basados en no–posición: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) y Ad–Hoc On–Demand Distance Vector (AODV) y del algoritmo basado en posición: Location Routing Algorithm with Cluster–Based Flooding (LORA_CBF), han sido considerados. Como primer paso, hemos validado nuestro modelo de simulación propuesto en redes de pequeña escala, con los resultados de un experimento y los resultados de análisis matemático. Después, hemos usado simulaciones para comparar y validar nuestro modelo en redes de gran escala, con dos prominentes algoritmos reactivos: AODV y DSR. Finalmente, hemos desarrollado en OPNET, un modelo de trafico microscópico, que nos permite evaluar el rendimiento de 250 vehículos en términos del tiempo de descubrimiento de ruta, retardo punto a punto, carga de enrutamiento, sobre encabezado de enrutamiento, el sobre encabezado general y la razón de entrega de información.

Palabras Claves: Enrutamiento de difusión única, redes inalámbricas multisaltos, intercambio de datos intervehicular, redes ad–hoc, algoritmo de enrutamiento de localización con diseminación basada en grupos.

 

DESCARGA ARTICULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

References

1. C–K Toh. Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Protocols and Systems. Prentice–Hall International, Inc. 2002.        [ Links ]

2. Charles E. Perkins. Ad hoc networking. Addison Wesley. 2000.        [ Links ]

3. Timothy J. Shepard. A channel Access Scheme for Large Dense Packet Radio Networks. In proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM'96.        [ Links ]

4. http://www.research.rutgers.edu/~mini/sensornetworks.html        [ Links ]

5. hhttp://www.fleetnet.de        [ Links ]

6. Robert Morris, John Jannotti, Frans Kaashock, Jinyang Li and Douglass Decouto. CarNet: A Scalable Ad Hoc Wireless Network System. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGOPS European workshop: Beyond the PC: New Challenges for the Operating System, Kolding, Denmark, September 2000.        [ Links ]

7. Thomas Clausen, Philippe Jacket, Anis Laouiti, Pascale Minet, Paul Muhlethaler, Amir Qayyum, Laurent Viennot. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt, October 2003. IETF Internet Draft (Work in Progress).        [ Links ]

8. Richard G. Ogier, Mark G. Lewis, Fred L. Templin. Topology Dissemination based on Reverse–Path Forwarding (TBRPF). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3684.txt, February 2004. IETF Internet Draft (Work in Progress).        [ Links ]

9. Xukai Zou, Byrav Ramamurthy and Spyros Magliveras. Routing Techniques in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Classification and Comparison. Proceedings of the Sixth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, SCI, July 2002.        [ Links ]

10. Charles E. Perkins, Elizabeth M. Belding–Royer, Samir R. Das. Ad hoc On–Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt, July 2003. IETF Internet Draft (Work in Progress).        [ Links ]

11. David B. Johnson, David A. Maltz, Yih–Chun Hu. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks(DSR). http://www.ietf.org/internet–drafts/draft–ietf–manet–dsr–09.txt, April 2003. IETF Internet Draft (Work in Progress).        [ Links ]

12. Elizabeth M. Royer and Chai–Keong Toh. A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications, pages 46–55, April 1999.        [ Links ]

13. Young–Bae Ko, Nitin H. Vaidya. Location–Aided Routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. ACM/Baltzer Wireless Networks (WINET) Journal. Vol 6–4, 2000.        [ Links ]

14. Stefano Basagni, Imrich Chlamtac, Violet R. Syrotiuk, Barry A. Woodward. A Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility (DREAM). MOBICOM 98. Dallas Texas, USA.        [ Links ]

15. Jinyang Li, John Jannotti, Douglas S. J. De Couto, David R. Karger, Robert Morris. A Scalable Location Service for Geographic Ad Hoc Routing. ACM Mobicom 2000, Boston, MA.        [ Links ]

16. Silvia Giordiano, Ivan Stojmenovic and Ljubica Blazevic. Position Based Routing Algorithms for ad_hoc Networks: A Taxonomy. July 2001. http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~ivan/routing-survey.pdf        [ Links ]

17. Martin Mauve, Jörg Widmer and Hannes Hartenstein. A Survey on Position–Based Routing in Mobile Ad–Hoc Networks. IEEE Network Magazine, 15(6): 30–39, November 2001.        [ Links ]

18. M. M. Minderhoud. Simone 2000, simulation model of motorways with next generation vehicles, technical specification. March 2002.        [ Links ]

19. Serge P. Hoogendoorn, Piet H. L. Bovy. State–of–the–art of Vehicular Traffic Flow Modelling. Special Issue on Road Traffic Modelling and Control of the Journal of System and Control Engineering.        [ Links ]

20. Demetrio Carmine Festa, Giovanni Longo, Gabriella Mazzulla and Giuseppe Musolino. Experimental analysis of different simulation models for motorway traffic flow. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2001.        [ Links ]

21. Bobi Cvetkovski and Liljana Gavrilovska. A simulation of a mobile Highway traffic. IEEE VTC, 1998.        [ Links ]

22. Bobi Cvetkovski and Liljana Gavrilovska. A simulation of a mobile Highway traffic on a highway. Series Electronics and Energetics Vol. 11, No 1, pp 57–70, 1998.        [ Links ]

23. Jaime Barceló et al. Smartest Simulation Report, http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/smartest        [ Links ]

24. C–K Toh, Minar Delwar and Donald Allen. Evaluating the communication performance of Ad–hoc Wireless Network. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications, vol. I, no. 3, 2002.        [ Links ]

25. J. Broch, D. Maltz, D. Johnson, Y.–C. Hu and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi–hop wireless ad hoc networks routing protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 85–97, Dallas, TX, USA, 1998.        [ Links ]

26. Holger Fübler, Martin Mauve, Hannes Hartenstein, Dieter Vollmer and Michael Käsemann. A Comparison of Routing Strategies in Vehicular Ad–Hoc Networks. ACM Int. Conf. On Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM) 2002.        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons