3.1.1. SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY

Order Clupeiformes sensu ^{Grande, 1985}

Suborder Clupeoidei sensu ^{Grande, 1985}

Family Clupeidae ^{Cuvier, 1817}

Genus and species indeterminate

Referred material: IGM 11190 A and B, part and counterpart, fairly complete specimen without the jaws and fins (Figure 3).

Description: This almost complete specimen preserved in part and counterpart shows the trunk strongly curved, reaches 40 mm of standard length (SL), with none of its fins is preserved. In life this should be a chubby fish, with a triangular head and a shallow caudal peduncle, in which the maximum height of the trunk was about 13 mm.

Although the skull is poorly preserved, it is possible to observe that the skull roof bones are smooth. In addition, the parietals have the supratemporal commissure and are laterally displaced, separated by the supraoccipital bone. In the ethmoid region, both the mesethmid and vomer are well preserved, the first is located just above of the latter bone. The bones of both jaws are not preserved in this specimen; hence, the hyoid bones are partially exposed showing that the anterior ceratohyal is an elongated, rectangular, and no pierced bone.

There are thirty-four centra in the vertebral column, including 18 abdominals, 14 caudals, and two urals. The abdominal and caudal centra are somewhat distorted in IGM 11190; however, they seem to be rectangular, slightly higher than long. Probably, this fish has 16 preural ribs. Since the trunk is entirely scaled, it is not possible to see more details of the vertebral column and associated bones.

The pectoral fin is not preserved; however, in the pectoral girdle the cleithrum is a C shaped bone that is slightly widened at its ventral end. Behind this bone, there are two postclithra, the dorsal one is ovoid and the ventral one is rod-like. The single visible dorsal pterygiophore shows that the dorsal fin rises near to the middle of the SL. There are 10 visible anal pterygiophores showing that the anal fin is located between 75 and 82.5% of the SL (30 and 35 mm). The pelvic and caudal fins are not preserved.

The trunk entirely covered for ovoid cicloid scales, taller than long, ornamented with numerous concentric circulli. No dorsal scutes are preserved in this fish. A ventral row of at least 14 abdominal scutes extends between the isthmus and the first anal pterygiophores. The abdominal scutes are triangular; they have a thickened ventral edge that projects back and forth from small spines, as well as a laminar triangular wing slightly curved forward, directed upward, and covering lest than one third of the abdominal area below the vertebral column. These scutes barely overlap each other, leaving space to observe the extension of the ribs. In the caudal skeleton, the preural 1 and the first uroneural bone are fused and there is a caudal diastema present between the hypurals 2 and 3.

Remarks: IGM 11190 is recognized as part of the Clupeoidei (Clupeomorpha, Clupeiformes) because it shows the diagnostic features of this clade, described by ^{Grande, 1985}). This has the abdominal scute series as all clupeomorphs; its parietals are entirely separated by the supraoccipital bone and its anterior ceratohyal is not medially pierced due the loss of the beryciform foramen, as occur in all clupeiforms (see Grande, 1985); additionally, as in all clupeoideis, this specimen shows the fusion of the first uroneural with the first preural centrum, the ural centra are relatively small in relation with the most caudal preural centrum, confirms that this fish belongs to the mentioned Suborder.

In addition, based on data from ^{Grande (1985)}, it is possible to consider IGM 11190 as part of the superfamily Clupeoidea. The number of pleural ribs to pleural vertebrae ratio of IGM 11190 (15/32) is 0.46 and matches with that known for members of this clade (0.47 to 0.71).

The family Clupeidea is an ancient living group with a fossil record dating back to the Barremian-Aptian (Early Cretaceous) in marine deposits of the Morro de Chaves Formation, northeastern Brazil (^{Figuereido, 2009}; ^{Lavoué et al., 2013}; ^{Malabarba and Di Dario, 2017}). Although, IGM 11190 deserves an accurate study; additional fossil materials are required to reach an accurate taxonomical determination of this clupeid fish.

Order Aulopiformes ^{Rosen, 1973}

Family Dercetidae ^{Woodward, 1901}

Genus Dercetis ^{Agassiz, 1833}

Dercetis sp.

Type species: According ^{Taverne (2005a)} the type species of this genus is Dercetis elongatus ^{Agassiz, 1833 (p. 258)}. The first reference of this genus was published by ^{Agassiz (1833, p. XLIII)} but its description was published ten years later by Munster and Agassiz, 1843 (in ^{Agassiz, 1843, p. 258}), from the Turonian and Senonian marine deposits of England [^{Goody (1969)} recognized Dercetis scutatus Agassiz, 1834, from the Turonian and Campanian deposits of Baumberg, in Westphalia, Northweastern, Germany, as the type species of Dercetis; however, this can be considered a nomen nudum because the single specimen of this species was never illustrated and now is lost].

Referred material: IGM 11191, an elongated almost complete fish without caudal fin exposing its left side (Figure 4).

Description: IGM 11191is an elongated and longirostrine fish of at least 140 mm length that exposes its left lateral surface, in which the caudal fin is not preserved (Figure 4). The head is 10 mm high and 38 mm length. The skull length is about 30 mm; this is divided into the length of orbitalpostorbital and preorbital (= snout) regions, which lengths are 12 and 18 mm (or 40 and 60% of the skull length) respectively. The elongated trunk is slightly lower and uniformly high all along.

Although bad preserved, in the head both jaws are projected forward to the same level. The dentary shows two rows of slightly curved, conic teeth, of similar size. The premaxilla has a discernible wide and high ascending process. The right frontal bone is almost entirely lost; however, above the orbit the surface of this bone has some small tubercles.

This fossil preserves seventy vertebrae showing the shape of thread reels, in which the intervertebral articulation surfaces are wide and massive while their middle part is strongly constricted. Although, the vertebrae are about 1.5 time longer than high in the abdominal region; they tend to be less long. The last two vertebrae preserved in this specimen, probably the first preural centra, are slightly higher than long. A single transverse process laterally rises from the anterior half of each abdominal centra. At least 40 vertebrae are abdominal and attach with thin preural ribs. The neural and hemal spines are short and curved backward. Numerous epineurals and epipleurals are present all along the trunk.

The pectoral fin is behind the middle of the pectoral girdle, between the vertebral column and the abdominal border of the trunk and consists of 11 rays. The pre-pelvic distance is 55 mm; this fin is located 25 mm behind the pectoral girdle, is opposed to the middle part of the dorsal fin consisting of at least 5 rays. The dorsal fin is 52 mm length and is located between the 54 mm (= predorsal length) and 106 mm of the fish length consisting of about 40 rays. The anal fin is extremely short; its length is juts about 8 mm and it is located between the 110 mm (= preanal length) and 118 mm of the fish length consisting of eight rays.

Although these are poorly preserved, it is possible to see that IGM 11191 has three rows of smooth and triradiate scutes along the body; one along the dorsal body edge; another along the ventral body edge; and the last covers the flank of the trunk just above the vertebral column.

Remarks: Recently ^{Vernygora et al. (2017)} reviewed the phylogenetic relationship of 14 genera included in the clade Dercetidae; they point out that this family is supported on a single non-ambiguous synapomorphy: the presence of reduced neural spines. Other homoplasic features are the presence of shallow head, long snout, and arrow shaped flank scutes. IGM 11191 shows all these characters supporting its inclusion within this family.

^{Vernygora et al. (2017, suppl. 1)} also revealed two monophyletic groups within Dercetidae. One of these groups includes Dercetis as sister group of Cyranichthys ^{Taverne, 1987}, and Ophiodercetis ^{Taverne, 2005b}; these three genera share the presence of ascending process in the premaxilla, a single pair of transverse processes on abdominal vertebrae, a long dorsal fin (with more than 20 rays) and more than one tooth row in the mandible. IGM 11191 is included within this Dercetis-Ophiodercetis group because it shows the first three of these characteristics.

^{Taverne (2006, fig. 13, p. 41-42)} pointed out that Dercetis differs from other dercetid genera in at least four characteristics. Although in all dercetids the preorbital region or snout is elongated; in Dercetis the snout is relatively short and does not exceed 60% of the skull length. Contrary, in other dercetids the snout is considerably longer (at least two times than the orbito-postorbital part of the neurocranium), including the recently published Candelarhynchus ^{Vernygora, Murray, Luque, Parra Ruge, and Páramo Fonseca, 2017}. In Dercetis, the ascending process of the premaxilla is well developed whereas in other dercetids this disappear or is reduced to a tiny nodule. Here again, IGM 11191 show both features and its identification as a representative of Dercetis is undeniable.

Although once the genus Dercetis included a large number of species (see ^{Goody, 1969}; ^{Silva and Gallo, 2011}); today, two nominal species are included within the genus, the type species D. elongatus from Turonian-Senonian deposits of England and D. triqueter ^{Pictet, 1850}, from Santonian sediments of Sahel Alma, Lebanon. The temporal distribution of this genus could reach the limit of the Cretaceous if the finding of Dercetis in Maastrichtian sediments of Muwaqqar Chalk Marl Formation, near Harrana, Lebanon, reported by Kadummi (2006) is confirmed.

Both nominal species of Dercetis differ in the proportions of the skull, of the preorbital region of the cranium, the lengths of the preorbital-postorbital regions of the skull are 60% and 40% in D. triqueter while in D. elongatus they are 50% (^{Woodward, 1901, p. 184-185}; ^{Goody, 1969, p. 62}). In the present context, IGM 11191resembles D. triqueter; however, it is desirable to have more specimens from San José de Gracia before reaching a conclusion. At this time, IGM 11191 is referred to as an indeterminate species of the genus Dercetis; however, it is noticeable that this specimen represents the first finding of this genus in America.

Family Enchodontidae sensu ^{Fielitz, 2004}

Genus Enchodus ^{Agassiz, 1833 (p. XLIV)}

Enchodus sp.

Type species: Enchodus lewesiensis (^{Mantell, 1822}), Turonian and Senonian rocks of the Middle Chalk in Lewes, Sussex, southeastern England (^{Goody, 1969}).

Referred material: IGM 11192, a complete palatine bone bearing an incomplete tooth (Figure 5).

Description: IGM 11192 includes an almost complete palatine bone that is exposed on its labial surface. This stout bone and its terminal tooth form a squad-like structure. The palatine is 42.97 long and 7.43 mm high; its ventral edge is almost straight and the dorsal is slightly curved (Figure 5). The medial surface of this massive bone is rounded and practically smooth, being wider along and near its ventral edge. A shallow groove for the palato-premaxillary ligament is projected backward from the middle of the dorsal edge of this palatine; unfortunately, neither the end of this grove nor the groove for the palate-maxillary ligament are preserved. The palatine has a remarkable wide rounded cavity with rough surface opening on the lateroventral surface of the bone just behind the palatine tooth.

Although, the tip of the single stout palatine tooth is not preserved; this ankylosed structure should be straight and smooth. The basal and preserved part of this tooth is 11 mm measured from the ventral surface of the palatine; however, its total length could reach 20 mm or about 50% of the palatine length. This tooth is slightly tilted forward forming an obtuse angle, of about 100°, with the ventral edge of the palatine. The position of this tooth also is clearly terminal, the palatine does not project in front of this tooth. The broken surface of the palatine tooth is ovoid, compressed laterally, and has an anterior cutting edge or carina (Figure 5).

Remarks: The genus Enchodus, commonly named as saber-tooth fish, consists of about 70 nominal species, being the most diverse fossil member of the family Enchodontidae (Order Aulopiformes). The species of Enchodus were active Upper Albian-Eocene marine predators that inhabited practically all the seas of the planet (^{Fielitz and González-Rodríguez, 2010}). In Mexico, fossil of Enchodus have been collected in numerous Albian-Maastrichtian deposits throughout Coahuila, Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon, San Luis Potosi, Hidalgo, Guerrero, and Chiapas (^{Maldonado-Koerdell, 1956}; ^{Blanco-Piñón 1998}; ^{González-Barba and Espinosa-Chávez, 2005}; ^{Alvarado-Ortega et al., 2006a}, ^2006b; ^{Giersch et al., 2008}; ^{Díaz-Cruz et al., 2016}; among others); however, only five species have been identified in Mexico at the species level.

These comprise complete specimens of the species E. zimapanensis ^{Fielitz and GonzálezRodríguez, 2010}, from Albian-Cenomanian deposits of the Muhi quarry, Hidalgo, central Mexico; isolated palatine teeth referred to E. petrosus ^{Cope, 1874}, E. gladiolus (^{Cope, 1875}), and E. ferox ^{Leidy, 1855}, from Maastrichthian deposits of the Ocozocuautla Formation, Chiapas, southern Mexico, (^{Carbot-Chanona and Than-Marchese, 2013}); as well as possible representatives of E. venator ^{Arambourg, 1954} from the Turonian deposits of Vallecillo quarry, Nuevo León, northern México, which were reported by ^{Giersch (2014)} as E. cf. venator. Among these, E. zimapanensis is a remarkable because it represents the oldest species known of the genus (Albian-Cenomanian) and the only species restricted to Mexico.

Despite its taxonomic richness, in the most recent systematic studies on Enchodus, only 18 species have been considered (^{Goody, 1976}, ^{Chalifa, 1996}, ^{Bogan and Agnolin, 2010}, among others) and just 14 of them were included into the last phylogenetic approaches (^{Fielitz, 2004}; ^{Fielitz and González-Rodríguez, 2010}; ^{Cavin et al., 2012}; ^{Díaz-Cruz et al., 2016}; ^{Holloway et al., 2017}; among others). Considering the results of ^{Díaz-Cruz et al. (2016)}; the presence of a single palatine tooth is a homoplasic condition shared only for Rharbichthys ferox ^{Arambourgh, 1954} and all members of the family Enchodontidae menus Unicachichthys multidentatus ^{Díaz-Cruz, Alvarado-Ortega and Carbot-Chanona, 2016}. Unicachichthys is a peculiar enchodontid fish, in which the palatine is multidentated.

Among enchodontids with a single palatine tooth, the cross section of this tooth is symmetrical, ovoid, and shows a single anterior carina (unicarinated) only in five species, including E. shumardi ^{Leidy, 1856}; E. dirus, ^{Leidy, 1857}; as well as E. gladiolus, E. zimapanensis, and the unnamed Enchodus species from Gavdos (^{Parris et al., 2007}; ^{Fielitz and González-Rodríguez, 2010}; ^{Cavin et al., 2012}; ^{Holloway et al., 2017}; among others). In contrasts, in other enchodontids in which the palatine tooth is known, the cross section of this tooth is rounded without carinae or laterally compressed and bi-carinated. In Rharbichthys ferox this tooth is also ovoid in cross section and unicarinated; however, this species clearly differs from IGM 11192 and the nominal Enchodus spp. because its single palatine tooth is strongly tilted forward and so extremely developed that it is noticeably longer than the palate bone (^{Fielitz, 2004, fig. 4E}). Moreover, among the group of five species of Enchodus noted above, in E. zimapanensis and the unnamed Enchodus species from Gavdos the palatine tooth shows longitudinal striations (^{Fielitz and González-Rodríguez, 2010}; ^{Cavin et al., 2012}) whereas in E. shumardi, E. gladiolus, and E. dirus this tooth is entirely smooth (Parris et al., 2017).

Although the palatine tooth of IGM 11192 shares the characteristics discussed above with Enchodus shumardi, E. gladiolus, and E. dirus, including a smooth its palatine that in cross section is symmetrical, ovoid, and is uni-carinated (Figure 5); it is not possible to advance further in the attempt to determine the taxonomic identity of this fossil from San José de Gracia quarry. Another feature shared by IGM 11192 and these same species is the anterior terminal position of the palatine tooth. Although this feature deserves to be analyzed in greater detail and beyond the scope of this work; it is noteworthy that in other species of Enchodus where the palatine is well known, as well as in Rharbichthys ferox, the palatine tooth is not terminal because this bone has a projection in front of the tooth base (^{Goody, 1969, fig. 36}; ^{Fielitz, 2004, fig. 4E}; ^{Chalifa, 1996; figs. 3, 5, 6; among others}).

Nonetheless, the taxonomical approximation of IGM 11192 with the three nominal Enchodus species noted above is geographically congruent since all of them are present only in North Ame rica, within a range between Late Cenomanian and Early Maastrichthian (^{Parris et al., 2007}). The distribution of Enchodus gladiolus includes Maastrichthian deposits of the southern part of México (^{Carbot-Chanona and Than-Marchese, 2013}) and probably also reaches Maastrichthian deposits of South America (^{Bogan and Angolin, 2010}). Although based on the present context, IGM 0001 is considered as an uncertain species of Enchodus; its morphological features suggest that it is related with or belongs to some one of these three North American Enchodus species.

Order Sphenocephaliformes Rosen and Patterson,

1969

Family Sphenocephalidae ^{Patterson, 1964}

Genus Xenyllion ^{Wilson and Murray, 1996}

Xenyllion sp.

Type species: Xenyllion zonensis ^{Wilson and Murray, 1996}, from the Early Cenomanian deposits of the Fish Scale Formation, in Alberta, Canada.

Referred material: IGM 11193, complete and articulated specimen (Figure 6).

Description: High diamond shaped fish, with the skeleton completely preserved but with the trunk somewhat curved upward. In this fish the standard length is about 18 mm, the head length is about 7 mm, and the body height is 8 mm. The short dorsal fin consists of 4 thin spines plus six or seven rays; it is located just at the end of the first half of the SL (predorsal length = 8mm). The anal fin is short, is composed of at least four thin spines plus eight rays, and located in the last quarter of the SL (preanal length = 14 mm). The pectoral fin consists of about 10 rays and is located just above the ventral border of the trunk. The pelvic fin consists of about seven rays plus an anterior rudimentary (short) spine; this fin is located in the middle of the distance between the pectoral and the anal fin base, opposed to the middle part of the dorsal fin (Figure 6).

Although bones of the head are strongly cracked, the skull is triangular, with a high supraoccipital crest, and mainly roofed by the frontal bones. The lower jaw is projected upward from the posterior edge of the orbit. The premaxilla is about triangular with ascending process as short as the articular process, which is separated by a shallow notch. The maxilla is a bar-like structure projected up to the anterior end of the premaxilla. No teeth are exposed.

The preopercle is almost entirely preserved as an impression; however, its shows a short horizontal limb, whose length is contained four times in the height of the vertical limb of this bone. Both preopercular limbs form an angle of about 90°. There is an impression of a lateral flange along the way of the preopercular sensory canal, which seems to be open along a groove. The posterior edge of this preopercular flange is sinuous. Also, there are impressions of two long spines in the posteroventral preopercular edge.

Vertebral column consists of 26 centra, including about 13 abdominals, 11 preurals, and two urals. About 12 thin and short preural ribs are present just covering the dorsal half of the abdominal ca vity. Neural and hemal arches are small and their respective spines are thin. Some epineurals and epipleurals are preserved; however, their position, number, and sizes are unclear. There is a single supraneural bone located above the neural spines of the anterior abdominal centra. In the caudal skeleton, the preural 2 bears a complete, long, and thin neural spine. The preural 1 has a triangular short neural arch and above of this, there are two epineurals. The trunk is covered with cicloid scales with crenate posterior edge and strong circuli on the anterior half.

Remarks: Sphenocephalidae is a family of extinct acantomorph marine fishes erected by ^{Patterson (1964)}: the species Sphenocephalus fissicaudus ^{Agassiz, 1839 (p. 4)}, from the Campanian deposits of Baumberg, Westphalia, Germany. Later, another German species from Sendenhorst, Westphalia, was described as Sphenocephalus brachypterygius ^{Rosen and Patterson, 1969}. Recently, Xenyllion zonensis ^{Wilson and Murray, 1996}, from the Early Cenomanian deposits of the Fish Scale Formation, in Alberta, Canada, was described as a new sphenocephalid member. Finally, X. stewarti, ^{Newbrey, Murray, Wilson, Brinkman and Neuman, 2013}, from the Early Cenomanian deposits of Mowry Formation in Vernal, Utah, USA was described and added to Xenyllion. In the following paragraphs, it is demonstrated that IGM 0005 is a member of the family Sphenocephalidae and the genus Xenyllion.

The presence of dorsal and anal spines in this fish support its inclusion within Acantomorpha, a group well characterized for the presence of spines in the dorsal and anal fins (^{Nelson et al., 2016}). The Paracanthopterygii is a problematic group of living fishes, with the oldest record dating back to the Cenomanian (^{Newbrey et al., 2013}). This group was named by ^{Greenwood et al. (1966)} as a Superorder and since then its monophyly and composition have been discussed (^{Rosen and Patterson, 1969}; ^{Wiley and Johnson, 2010}; ^{Borden et al., 2013}; among others). The presence of a complete neural spine on second preural, two epipleurals in the caudal support, and a single supraneural present are features of Paracanthopterygii (see ^{Greenwood et al., 1966, p. 352, 353}) and ^{Murray and Wilson (1999)} that are seen in the specimen IGM 11193.

One of two diagnostic characters of the order Sphenocephaliformes described by ^{Rosen and Patterson (1969)} are present in IGM 11193, its preopercle has large posteroventral spines. The other of these features, the opercle with posteroventral edge curved, is unknown in IGM 11193. Additionally, this Mexican specimen shows some characters included in the diagnosis of the single family of this order. According to ^{Patterson (1964)} and ^{Newbrey et al. (2013)}, the diagnostic characters of Sphenocephalidae include the presence of a pelvic splint (= rudimentary anterior spine), seven pelvic fin rays, as well as anal and dorsal fin with four to five spines each.

^{Newbrey et al. (2013)} provided a comparative exercise between the four sphenocephalid species. Based on their results, IGM 11193 is identified here as a new representative of the genus Xenyllion because they share two characteristics: the trunk is covered with crenate cycloid scales, and the preopercle shows similar proportions (both limbs form an angle of 90° and the horizontal limb is short and contained four times in the height of the preopercular vertical limb). In contrast in both Sphenocephalus species, the preopercles have a relatively long horizontal limb (its length is the half of the height of the vertical preoperclar limb) and both limbs form a posteroventral obtuse angle of about 120°; S. fissicaudus has oval spinoid cycloid scales whereas S. brachypterygius are rather rounded, apparently do not show spines, and the circuli form a triangular wave-form pattern.

The poor preservation of the skull in IGM 11193 prevents carrying out a deeper comparative analysis to determine its taxonomic identity with better precision. Despite this, the finding of IGM 11193 represents the first occurrence of a sphenocephalid fish in Mexico and the expansion of the geographical distribution of the genus Xenyllion in America.

Orden Squamata ^{Oppel, 1811}

Superfamily Mosasauroidea ^{Camp, 1923}

Family Mosasauridae ^{Gervais, 1853}

Subfamily Yaguarasaurinae ^{Palci, Caldwell, and Papazzoni, 2013}

Referred material: IGM 11194, isolated premaxilla and right maxilla (Figure 7).

Description: A preliminary description of this specimen is available in ^{Zavaleta-Villareal (2015)}. The pemaxilla is an unpaired compound bone that is drop-like shaped in dorsal view; its anterior edge is rounded, the posterior tapers forming an acute angle where the internarinal bar arises. Although this premaxillary process is almost entirely preserved as an impression; the thin internarinal bar is at least as long as the rest of the premaxilla. The dorsal-lateral surface of this bone is curved and exposes numerous pores of the ophthalmic nerve.

Ventrally, this bone is rather flat and is divided into four regions framed by two crests, one transversal that runs from side to side and other longitudinal that rises behind the anterior edge of this bone and it projects backwards. In each of the two previous regions two teeth are presented forming a line; while the two posterior regions have no teeth (Figure 7).

The right maxilla is an elongated bone tapered anterior and posteriorly, with the ventral edge straight and the dorsal one somewhat sinuous. The premaxilla-maxilla suture border is straight and extends over two maxillary teeth. The posterior edge of this bone is inclined downward from the top, but its bottom develops a thin and long postero -ventral process where there are no more teeth. The labial surface is curved and has a longitudinal axis protruding near the ventral edge of the bone. Although the surface of the maxilla shows nume rous pores of the maxillary nerve; nine of these form a row below the medial longitudinal edge of this bone and are arranged parallel to the ventral edge of this bone (Figure 7).

Eight conical teeth and three empty alveoli are placed on the maxillary alveolar border; these are ordered following the dental formula 1, 2, 3, 4, x, 6, x, 8, 9, x, 11. The teeth have ankylosed crowns; they have broad bases protruding from the alveolar maxillary edge. All teeth are entirely smooth and strongly curved backward. In cross section, teeth are rounded at the base, oval in the middle part, and form a weak anterior cutting edge or carina near to the tip (Figure 7).

Remarks: The presence of an unpaired premaxilla (resulting of the fusion of a couple of premaxillae) with four teeth in IGM 11194 supports its identification as a member of the Family Mosasauridae (see ^{Leblanc et al., 2012}, among others). According to ^{Palci et al. (2013)}, the occurrence of tooth roots largely exposed in medial view of jaw bones represents one of the synapomorphies supporting the monophyly of the subfamily Yaguarasaurinae, which gathers three genera. There include two monospecific genera, Yaguarasaurus columbianus ^{Páramo, 1994}, collected in Turonian sediments belonging to Villeta Formation along the Magdalena Valley, Colombia (^{Páramo, 1994}; ^{Páramo-Fonseca, 2000}); Russellosaurus coheni ^{Polcyn and Bell, 2005}, from the middle Turonian deposits of the Arcadia Park Shale, approximately 15 cm above Kamp Ranch Limestone, at Cedar Hill, Dallas County, Texas, USA; as well as to species of the genus Romeosaurus ^{Palci, Caldwell, and Papazzoni, 2013}, collected in Late Cretaceous localities of Verona, northen Italy, which recently were named as R. fumanensis (from the middle Turonian to early Santonian deposits near of the S. Anna di Alfaedo and Fumane villages) and R. sorbinii (from the middle Turonian deposits near of the S. Anna di Alfaedo Villages. These characteristics are present in IGM 11194 supporting its recognition as part of this subfamily (Figure 7).

Among other characteristics, the nominal members of Yaguarasaurinae differ from each other by the size of the premaxillary-maxillary suture, as well as the number and shape of maxillary teeth. The suture maxillary-premaxillary is over three maxillary teeth in Romerosaurus while it is over only two maxillary teeth on Yaguarasaurus and Russellosaurus (^{Palci et al., 2013, p. 600}). The number of premaxillary teeth is 14-15 in Yaguarasaurus (^{Páramo- Fonseca, 2000, p.127}), 13-15 in Romeosaurus (^{Palci et al., 2013, p. 600}), and 16 in Rusellosaurus (^{Polcyn and Bell, 2005, p. 323}). The maxillary teeth are moderately curved backward, probably smooth and with no carenae in Yuguarasaurus (^{Páramo- Fonseca, 2000, fig. 3}); and contrary, teeth are strongly curved, covered with fine medial longitudinal striations, and probably have no carenae in Rusellosaurus (^{Polcyn and Bell, 2005, fig. 2}). Finally, teeth are subcircular in cross section and strongly curved backward in both species of Romeosaurus; however, in R. fumanensis there are 15 maxillary teeth, entirely smooth, and bearing weak anterior and posterolateral carinae whereas R. sorbinii there are 13 maxillary teeth that are ornamented with longitudinal ridges and apparently with no carinae (^{Palci et al., 2013, p. 601, figs. 2, 4, and 7}).

IGM 11194 shows a peculiar combination of features that avoid determining its belonging to any previously known yaguarasaurine genus. In this Mexican fossil the maxillary-premaxillary suture is short as in Yaguarasaurus and Russellosaurus (extended over two maxillary teeth). The number of maxillary teeth (11) in IGM 11194 is lower than in the nominal yaguarasaurins (13-16). Contrary to R. sorbinii, teeth of IGM 11194are superficially smooth. Peculiarly, in cross section the teeth of IGM 11194 are rounded in the base, ovoid in the middle and clearly compressed laterally in the tip in which there is a small anterior carina. Although the accurate taxonomic identification of IGM 11194 is desirable; this represents a major effort that goes beyond this work. The discovery of IGM 11194 represents the first record of the subfamily Yaguarasaurinae in Mexico.