SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 número2Análisis de imágenes, calidad y maduración de semillas de jiló (Solanum gilo) índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Agrociencia

versão On-line ISSN 2521-9766versão impressa ISSN 1405-3195

Agrociencia vol.52 no.2 Texcoco Fev./Mar. 2018

 

Natural renewable resources

Reproductive characteristics variation in Pinus patula trees at a sexual seed orchard

Norma Beatriz Mendoza-Hernández1 

Carlos Ramírez-Herrera1 

Javier López-Upton1 

Valentín Reyes-Hernández1 

Pedro Antonio López2 

1Ciencias Forestales. Campus Montecillo. Colegio de Postgraduados. 56230. Montecillo, Estado de México.

2Campus Puebla, Colegio de Postgraduados. 72760. Santiago Momoxpan, Puebla. kmcram@colpos.mx


Abstract

Seed orchards are important to produce germplasm for forest plantation establishment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the variation of reproductive characteristics of cones and seeds in a Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham at a sexual orchard. The reproductive characteristics variation was considered to be influenced by the genetic constitution of the trees and by environmental differences. The study was conducted in an orchard at Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México. The experimental design was completely random and cones were the minimum experimental unit. The number of sampled cones varied with the production of three years in 19 sampled trees. The analyzed variables were dry cone weight, potential seeds number, percentage of aborted ovules, inbreeding index, seed weight, reproductive efficiency and full, empty and plagued seeds. All the variables showed differences between trees (p ≤ 0.01) and between production years (p ≤ 0.05). The number of damaged seeds (3 %) was higher in 2012. Dry cone weight (32 g), seed potential (117 seeds per cone), full seeds percentage (58 %), seed weight (9.5 mg) and reproductive efficiency (22 mg g-1) were higher in 2013. The percentage of aborted ovules and average inbreeding index (0.25) were higher in 2014. The variation levels were high in the reproductive characteristics of P. patula. The low inbreeding rate indicated low self-fertilization.

Key words: Pinus patula; seed orchard; reproductive characteristics; seeds; cones

Resumen

Los huertos semilleros son importantes para producir germoplasma para establecimiento de plantaciones forestales. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la variación de características reproductivas de conos y semillas en un huerto semillero sexual de Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. La variación de características reproductivas se consideró que es influenciada posiblemente por la constitución genética de los árboles y por diferencias ambientales. El estudio se realizó en un huerto en Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México. El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar y los conos fueron la unidad mínima experimental. El número de conos muestreados varió con la producción de tres años en 19 árboles muestreados. Las variables analizadas fueron peso seco del cono, número potencial de semillas, porcentaje de óvulos abortados, índice de endogamia, peso de la semilla, eficiencia reproductiva y semillas llenas, vanas y plagadas,. Todas las variables mostraron diferencias entre árboles (p ≤ 0.01) y entre años de producción (p ≤ 0.05). La cantidad de semillas dañadas (3 %) fue mayor en 2012; peso seco del cono (32 g), potencial de semillas (117 semillas por cono), porcentaje de semillas llenas (58 %), peso de semilla (9.5 mg) y eficiencia reproductiva (22 mg g-1) fueron mayores en 2013. El porcentaje de óvulos abortados e índice de endogamia promedio (0.25) fueron mayores en 2014. Los niveles de variación fueron altos en las características reproductivas de Pinus patula. El índice bajo de endogamia indicó autofecundación baja.

Palabras clave: Pinus patula; huerto semillero; características reproductivas; semillas; conos

Introduction

Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. is a species native to Mexico that grows naturally throughout the states of Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosi, Queretaro, Hidalgo, Estado de Mexico, Tlaxcala, Puebla, Guerrero, Oaxaca, Veracruz and Mexico City (Patiño and Kageyama, 1991; Perry, 1991). Pinus patula is the Mexican species with the largest plantation area of outside the country (Wormald, 1975; Ladrach, 1985), mainly because of the shape of their trunk, rapid growth and wood quality (Vela, 1980; Velázquez et al., 2004). Forest plantations in Mexico, including those of P. patula, are managed with germplasm collected in natural stands without considering the quality of the trees (Vargas, 2003).

In 2004, a trial program of progenies of P. patula started at north of the state of Puebla and east of the state of Hidalgo (Salaya et al., 2012; Morales et al., 2013). Progeny trials were planted with selected seed from this species in South Africa and Colombia by CAMCORE (International Tree Breeding and Conservation) and germplasm collected in natural stands at the states of Hidalgo, Puebla, and Veracruz selected by the Colegio de Postgraduados (Salaya et al., 2012). Several sexual seed orchards were established once the most fitted trees were determined after the progeny trials (Morales et al., 2013).

A seed orchard is an isolated higher quality plantation, intended to reduce ovule pollination by pollen from trees that grow outside the orchard (White et al., 2007). Seed orchards represent an important relationship between an improvement program and a plantation program (Fernandes et al., 2008).

Environmental conditions, such as temperature and precipitation, can influence the formation of male strobili and therefore pollen production which, in turn, can impact cones and seeds production in Pinus trees (Owens et al., 2005; Owens y Fernando, 2007). Cones and seeds analysis in a seed orchard determines the quantity and quality of the seeds (Bonner, 1993). This information is used in breeding programs, management strategies of germplasm production units and seed production monitoring of a species. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the variation of the reproductive characteristics of cones and seeds in three production years of a sexual seed orchard of P. patula. We hypothesized that the variation of the reproductive characteristics is influenced by the genetic constitution of the trees and by environmental variation that leads low pollen production that affects cones and seeds development.

Materials and methods

Seed orchard location

The sexual seed orchard of P. patula is located at Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán municipality, Hidalgo State (20° 09' 55" N, 98° 14' 07" W and 2200 m altitude). Pinus patula and P. teocote Schiede ex Schltdl. in a natural forest were located to the south and west of the orchard, and P. greggii Engelm. was located on a plantation to the north. The seed orchard originated from a progeny test established in 2004 with seeds from 792 trees of 72 families (Salaya et al., 2012). The trees with low growth rates, twisted and bifurcated stems, and crowns with abundant and thick branches were removed from the original test in 2013. Flowering and pollination of the cones that matured in 2012, 2013 and 2014 occurred when the experiment had 713 living trees. At the time of this study, the orchard consisted of 89 trees, from 43 families, from 13 origins. The trees in the orchard were distributed in an incomplete blocks arrangement, where those from the same family were distant to avoid or reduce inbreeding. Only 19 of these trees in the orchard produced seed in the three consecutive years, so the data analysis was carried out as if the trees were in a completely random design and the cones were the minimum experimental unit. All cones of each tree were collected.

Tree selection to collect cones and seeds

From December 2014 to February 2015, 909 cones of 19 trees were collected and individuals were chosen in this research for their large cone yield in one or more years, from 2012 to 2014 (Table 1).

Table 1 Amount of collected Pinus patula cones in trees at a sexual seed orchard. 

Árbol Conos recolectados (Número) Total
2012 2013 2014
1 16 17 8 41
2 10 0 0 10
20 0 21 34 55
21 0 0 28 28
22 6 18 40 64
26 0 17 47 64
29 27 22 55 104
32 0 0 28 28
38 0 7 72 79
39 9 7 20 36
40 11 6 17 34
50 0 21 5 26
55 4 7 5 16
60 21 8 12 41
62 8 0 9 17
66 0 12 35 47
68 20 20 0 40
72 28 31 72 131
74 12 9 27 48
Total 172 223 514 909

Cones were counted, and placed in individual paper bags with information of the cone number, tree number and production year. Pinus patula cones are serotinous and, for this reason, they remain closed in the tree several years (Perry, 1991). The production years were identified by the position of the cones and their color; thus, those of bright brown color at the apex of the branches correspond to 2014; the 2013 were brown color, with gray spots, located below the previous ones, and the 2012 cones were of grayish coloration (by the wear of its upper layer) in the lower whorl. Some cones with a different color to the previous ones were collected in the same branch, in different whorls, but cones of brown color with gray or gray spots were not found in the whorl or recent whorls.

Extraction and seed management

The cones were placed in a shaded and ventilated area to prevent fungi development and they were submerged 5 s in 70 °C water, dried and kept 24 h in a greenhouse to promote scales opening and facilitate seed extraction. The seeds were obtained by striking the cones on a table and removing the scales, which were classified as infertile and fertile. The fertile scales are in the central part of the cone (Bramlett et al., 1977).

The cones were kept at 70 °C for 20 h and their dry weight was obtained with the moisture loss curve previously obtained with a 100 cones sample maintained at 70 °C for 30 h. The dry weight (g) was assessed on an electronic scale, with a 0.1 g approximation (N08110©, OHAUS Corporation).

Evaluated reproductive variables

The potential number of seeds (PNS) was obtained by multiplying the number of fertile scales by two, which is the maximum number of seeds that a cone can produce, since each fertile scale has two ovules that could originate two seeds (Lyons, 1956; Bramlett et al., 1977; Mosseler et al., 2000). The full, empty and plagued seeds of each cone were counted and manually sorted. The number of aborted ovules was calculated by subtracting the number of filled, empty and plagued seeds from the PNS. The percentage of aborted ovules (%AO), filled seeds (%FS), empty (%ES) and plagued (%PS) was calculated respect to the PNS. The total weight of filled seeds per cone was obtained in an analytical balance (SM©, Chyo Balance Corporation). The full seed average weight (SWE) was estimated by dividing the total weight of the filled seeds by the number of seeds. Reproductive efficiency (RE) is an indicator of the proportion of energy that a tree allocates to seeds production respect to the cone mass, and it was calculated by dividing the filled seed weight (mg) by the dry cone weight (g) ) (DCW) (Mosseler et al., 2000). The inbreeding index (II) was the proportion of the number of empty seeds respect to the seeds total (Mosseler et al., 2000).

Statistical analysis

Cones and seeds characteristics were analyzed with the GLM-SAS / PC procedure for Windows version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., 2012) using the following model:

Yijk=μ+Ai+ARj+Ai×ARj+εijk (1)

where Yijk is the response variable, μ is the experimental mean, Ai is the effect of the i-th production year, ARj is the effect of the jth tree, Ai x ARj is the interaction of the production year × tree, and εijk It is the experimental error.

The components of the variance were estimated with the VARCOMP-SAS / PC (REML) procedure (SAS Institute Inc., 2012), where σ²year is the variance between production years, σ²tree is the tree variance, σ²year x tree is the interaction variance from the production year × tree, and σ²e is the error variance.

Results and Discussion

The analysis of variance showed differences (p ≤ 0.01) in the CDW between production years and trees (Table 2). The experimental error contributed with the greatest percentage of the total variance for this and the other variables. The average CDW was 29, 31 and 32 g in 2014, 2012 and 2013. These results (36 and 50 g) were lower than those of P. patula trees in a forest at Pinal de Amoles, Querétaro, Mexico, and at a plantation in Madagascar (Patiño and Kageyama, 1991). In our research, the difference between years could be due to genetic and environmental differences, according to the variance component values for the trees source of variation and experimental error (Table 2). Trees 39, 60 and 62 had the highest CDW in 2012, 2013 and 2014, each (Tables 3, 4 and 5). The CDW of tree 1 was the lowest in 2012 and 2013; only above tree 55 in 2014 (Tables 3, 4 and 5).

Table 2 Variance components of the reproductive characteristics of Pinus patula at a sexual seed orchard in Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México. 

Características σ
Total
Componentes de la varianza (% de la σ2 total)
σ2año σ2árbol σ2año*árbol σ2error
Peso seco del cono 99 1.4 36.9 5.0 56.7
Núm. potencial de semillas 2559 6.7 23.8 14.1 55.4
Óvulos abortados (%) 127 1.8 6.8 7.2 84.2
Semillas llenas (%) 438 3.4 27.6 8.3 60.7
Semillas vanas (%) 183 0.3 28.9 5.4 65.4
Semillas dañadas (%) 15 1.3 4.7 7.7 86.3
Índice de endogamia 0.04 0.8 34.4 5.3 59.5
Peso de la semilla 13 1.0 11.3 22.5 65.2
Eficiencia reproductiva 148 6.1 21.0 23.0 49.9

Variance; All variables were statistically different for the variation sources (p ≤ 0.05).

Table 3 Averages (± standard error) of cone and seed characteristics of Pinus patula trees at a sexual seed orchard in Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México, 2012. 

Árbol PSC NPS %OA %SLL %SV %SD IE PSE ER
1 19 ± 1 131 ± 7 12±2 82±2 5±1 1±0 0.06 ± 0.01 7 ± 0 41 ± 3
2 26 ± 2 67 ± 6 50±7 44±4 25±6 5±3 0.29 ± 0.05 8 ± 1 10 ± 2
22 24 ± 1 39 ± 8 50±6 25±6 23±5 2±1 0.46 ± 0.11 7 ± 1 2 ± 1
29 35 ± 2 171 ± 8 24±4 62±4 13±2 1±0 0.18 ± 0.02 8 ± 0 25 ± 2
39 44 ± 2 145 ± 3 28±3 62±4 9±3 1±0 0.12 ± 0.03 11 ± 0 22 ± 2
40 30 ± 2 87 ± 13 27±7 41±4 25±4 7±2 0.33 ± 0.03 8 ± 0 9 ± 2
55 19 ± 2 88 ± 18 24±7 66±7 9±2 1±0 0.11 ± 0.01 8 ± 1 25 ± 5
60 39 ± 1 116 ± 6 33±3 55±3 6±1 7±2 0.08 ± 0.01 9 ± 0 14 ± 1
62 40 ± 4 132± 11 14±5 81±5 4±1 1±0 0.04 ± 0.01 13 ± 0 35 ± 3
68 26 ± 2 75 ± 9 35±3 38±3 26±4 1±0 0.40 ± 0.04 7 ± 0 8 ± 1
72 35 ± 1 152 ± 9 16±3 65±3 16±2 2±1 0.19 ± 0.01 8 ± 0 23 ± 2
74 38 ± 2 82 ± 9 33±5 51±2 15±2 2±0 0.23 ± 0.03 13 ± 0 14 ± 2

PSC: cone dry weight (g); NPS: potential number of seeds (#); %OA: percentage of aborted ovules; %SLL: percentage of filled seeds; %SV: percentage of empty seeds; %SD: percentage of damaged seeds, IE: inbreeding index; PSE: seed weight (mg); ER: reproductive efficiency (mg g-1).

Table 4 Averages (± standard error) cone and seed characteristics of Pinus patula trees at a sexual seed orchard, in Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013. 

Árbol PSC NPS %OA %SLL %SV %SD IE PSE ER
1 20 ± 1 114 ± 7 19±2 77±3 4±1 0±0 0.05 ± 0.01 7 ± 0 31 ± 2
20 33 ± 1 141 ± 8 18±3 71±3 10±1 1±0 0.13 ± 0.02 11 ± 0 35 ± 3
22 30 ± 1 92 ± 10 31±5 30±3 36±1 3±0 0.53 ± 0.04 8 ± 1 9 ± 1
26 28 ± 1 111 ± 10 18±4 62±6 19±3 1±1 0.25 ± 0.04 9 ± 0 23 ± 3
29 34 ± 2 176 ± 8 21±3 65±4 13±2 1±1 0.17 ± 0.02 9 ± 0 29 ± 2
38 37 ± 2 139 ± 10 20±5 67±4 11±3 3±1 0.13 ± 0.03 11 ± 0 27 ± 3
39 34 ± 2 136 ± 9 26±5 55±7 18±7 1±0 0.23 ± 0.07 9 ± 1 19 ± 4
40 30 ± 5 121 ± 14 23±6 67±6 9±2 1±1 0.12 ± 0.02 9 ± 1 25 ± 3
50 30 ± 1 50 ± 6 36±2 36±3 24±3 4±2 0.38 ± 0.04 11 ± 1 7 ± 1
55 26 ± 1 121 ± 11 19±4 74±5 6±1 1±0 0.07 ± 0.01 9 ± 0 32 ± 4
60 41 ± 3 119 ± 15 30±5 55±6 12±6 3±2 0.15 ± 0.07 10 ± 1 17 ± 3
66 37 ± 1 151 ± 8 25±3 63±3 11±1 0±0 0.14 ± 0.01 10 ± 0 25 ± 2
68 33 ± 2 88 ± 6 34±3 50±3 16±1 0±0 0.24 ± 0.02 10 ± 0 13 ± 2
72 40 ± 2 145 ± 8 20±3 65±3 14±2 1±0 0.18 ± 0.01 9 ± 0 22 ± 2
74 29 ± 3 55 ± 10 36±7 37±9 26±4 1±1 0.46 ± 0.09 10 ± 1 9 ± 2

PSC: cone dry weight (g); NPS: potential number of seeds (#); %OA: percentage of aborted ovules; %SLL: percentage of filled seeds; %SV: percentage of empty seeds; %SD: percentage of damaged seeds; IE: inbreeding index; PSE: seed weight (mg); ER: reproductive efficiency (mg g-1).

Table 5 Averages (± standard error) of cone and seed characteristics of Pinus patula trees at a sexual seed orchard, in Cuaunepantla, Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, México, in 2014. 

Árbol PSC NPS %OA %SLL %SV %SD IE PSE ER
1 20 ± 3 57 ± 11 32±6 62±6 5±3 0±0 0.07 ± 0.03 7 ± 0 13 ± 3
20 31 ± 1 101 ± 6 18±3 66±3 13±2 3±1 0.16 ± 0.02 11 ± 0 25 ± 2
21 28 ± 2 69 ± 7 35±3 36±3 29±3 1±0 0.43 ± 0.04 11 ± 0 10 ± 1
22 24 ± 1 74 ± 5 29±2 28±2 41±2 2±0 0.56 ± 0.03 8 ± 0 7 ± 1
26 27 ± 1 90 ± 8 30±2 50±3 19±2 0±0 0.29 ± 0.03 9 ± 0 15 ± 1
29 32 ± 1 119 ± 6 33±2 48±2 18±2 1±0 0.27 ± 0.02 9 ± 0 15 ± 1
32 20 ± 1 70 ± 6 27±3 54±3 17±2 2±1 0.22 ± 0.02 8 ± 0 15 ± 1
38 40 ± 1 138 ± 5 24±2 64±2 9±1 3±0 0.12 ± 0.01 11 ± 0 24 ± 1
39 35 ± 1 141 ± 8 21±3 62±4 14±2 3±1 0.18 ± 0.03 9 ± 0 23 ± 2
40 22 ± 1 66 ± 6 27±3 50±3 22±3 1±1 0.30 ± 0.03 9 ± 0 13 ± 2
50 29 ± 4 115 ± 16 24±5 51±11 22±7 3±1 0.30 ± 0.09 11 ± 0 23 ± 6
55 18 ± 3 61 ± 14 32±6 50±8 10±3 8±5 0.14 ± 0.04 7 ± 1 18 ± 2
60 36 ± 2 92 ± 6 41±2 44±4 11±4 4±2 0.18 ± 0.06 9 ± 0 10 ± 1
62 42 ± 3 79 ± 13 33±4 53±7 12±5 3±1 0.20 ± 0.09 12 ± 0 12 ± 2
66 23 ± 1 80 ± 6 35±3 46±2 17±2 2±0 0.25 ± 0.01 9 ± 0 11 ± 1
72 37 ± 1 124 ± 4 25±1 61±2 13±1 1±0 0.17 ± 0.01 9 ± 0 19 ± 1
74 32 ± 1 64 ± 7 35±3 43±4 19±2 2±1 0.31 ± 0.03 12 ± 0 10 ± 1

PSC: cone dry weight (g); NPS: potential number of seeds (#); %OA: percentage of aborted ovules; %SLL: percentage of filled seeds; %SV: percentage of empty seeds; %SD: percentage of damaged seeds; IE: inbreeding index; PSE: seed weight (mg); ER: reproductive efficiency (mg g-1).

The PNS showed differences (p ≤ 0.01) between years and trees (Table 2). The PNS averages ranged between 91 and 117 per cone in 2014 and 2013, each. PNS difference could be due to differences in pollen production between years and to early pollination, since it stimulates fertile scales production that increases PNS (Owens et al., 2005). PNS averages in our study were lower than those reported for P. patula (125 potential seeds per cone, Dvorak, 2002). Tree 29 had the highest PNS in “n” for 2012 and 2013 and tree 39 in 2014; this tree had a high potential in the three years. In contrast, tree 22 had the minimum seed potential only for 2012, and the seed potential in that year was less than the average of all trees in the three evaluated years.

The analysis of variance showed differences (p ≤ 0.01) in %AO between trees and years. The highest %AO (29 %) was registered in 2012 and 2014 mature cones, the lowest (25%) was found in 2013 mature cones. The ovules abortion may be due to pollen absence, lack of development of the pollen tubes or short pollen tubes, which in turn fails to fertilize the ovule (Owens et al., 2005). The %AO were lower in P. patula in the three evaluated years than in P. leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. cones (72.9 %) (Morales-Velázquez et al., 2010). In contrast, these were higher in P. patula than in P. engelmannii Carr., P. durangensis Mart. and P. rzedowskii (Madrigal & Caballero) (20, 23 and 22%, each) (Bustamante-García et al., 2012; Bustamante-García et al., 2014; Castilleja et al., 2016). Trees had low contribution to the total variation percentage. Trees 2 and 22 had the maximum values for this characteristic in 2012. Trees 50 and 74 showed the maximum value for this characteristic in 2013. Tree 60 reached the maximum value in 2014 and tree 1 showed the lowest value in 2012; trees 26 and 20 and 20 and 39 showed the lowest values during 2013 and 2014.

The analysis of variance showed differences (p ≤ 0.01) in the %FS between years and trees. The average %FS were higher than 50 and 58 % for the three years. These percentages represent 72 and 74 filled seeds per cone in 2012 and 2013 and 55 seeds in 2014. The number of filled seeds per cone per year, over the three years, was greater than the number of filled seeds (22 filled seeds per cone) in cones collected in natural populations of P. patula, and the harvested number (45 to 50 seeds per cone) in a seed orchard of this species in Zimbabwe (Geary and Pattinson, 1969; Barrett, 1972; Barnes and Mullin, 1974). The number of filled seeds per cone in the three years in the present research was within the reported values (22 to 93 seeds filled per cone) for P. patula (Patiño and Kageyama, 1991). The number of filled seeds per cone can considerably vary between years due to climate, such as low precipitation, low temperature or damages by insects (Andersson, 1965; Patiño and Kageyama 1991; De Groot and Schnekenburger, 1996). Average %FS were higher in P. patula in each of the assessed years at the present research respect to the reported percentages for P. leiophylla (2 %) and P. rzedowskii (17 %) cones (Morales-Velázquez et al., 2010; Castilleja et al., 2016) and similar to those recorded for P. engelmannii (49 %), P. durangensis (49 %) and P. ayacahuite var. veitchii (Shaw) (55 %) (Bustamante-García et al., 2012; Bustamante-García et al., 2014; Castilleja et al., 2016). The %FS among trees considerably varied between years (Tables 3, 4 and 5). Trees 1 and 62 had the highest full seeds percentage in 2012. Number 22 had the lowest percentage in the three years. The high number of filled seeds per cone could be due the high crossing rate between genetically different individuals achieved by leaving individuals of different origins and 20 m spacing between trees of the same family in the orchard.

The analysis of variance showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) in the %ES between trees and between years. The %ES was low respect to seed potential during the three years. The %ES average was 15 % in 2012 and 2013 and 17 % in 2014. The %ES average in P. patula in the present research were lower than those reported for P. strobus L. (22 %), P. leiophylla (24 %) and P. rzedowskii (61 %) (Rajora et al., 2002; Morales-Velázquez et al., 2010; Castilleja et al., 2016). Also, the averages for this variable were lower than those reported for P. engelmannii (27 %) and P. durangensis (26 %) (Bustamante-García et al., 2012; Bustamante-García et al., 2014). However, the averages of %ES shown here were similar to those of P. leiophylla (18 % in row 18) in a seed orchard and from natural populations of P. ayacahuite var. veitchii (17 %) (Gómez-Jiménez et al., 2010; Castilleja et al., 2016). Self-fertilization is the main cause of vain seeds production (Dogra, 1967). In addition, orchard trees hybridization with P. teocote and P. greggii as close relatives of P. patula is likely (Hernández-León et al., 2013) and may also negatively affect seeds quality (Wachowiak et al., 2005; Ávila-Flores et al., 2016). Tree 68 had the maximum %ES in 2012 and tree 22 following years. Tree 62 had the lowest %ES in 2012 and tree 1 had the lowest values the following years (Tables 3, 4 and 5).

%PS had significant differences between years (p ≤ 0.01) and between trees (p ≤ 0.05). The average %PS was 2.6, 1.4 and 2.3 % from the seed potential in 2012, 2013 and 2014, each. These %PS were higher than those obtained for P. monticola Dougl. ex D. Don in a seed orchard at Kalamanca (1.2 %), Vernon, British Columbia, Canada (Owens and Fernando, 2007) and in a wild population of P. leiophylla (0.9 %) at the State of Michoacán, México (Morales-Velázquez et al., 2010). Trees 40 and 60 had the highest %PS in 2012 (Table 3), trees 50 and 55 had the highest values in 2013 and 2014, each (Tables 4 and 5). The low %PS in the cones throughout the three years confirmed low insects presence in the cones and seeds at the research orchard after three evaluation years.

The II showed differences between years (p ≤ 0.05) and between trees (p ≤ 0.01). The second major variation was with the trees, after the experimental error (Table 2). The II were 0.21, 0.22 and 0.24 in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The inbreeding rate due to tree varied from 0.05 in tree 1 to 0.53 in tree 22 in 2013. II in P. patula were lower in this orchard, in each of the three evaluated years, compared to the reported values for Picea rubens Sarg. (0.61), P. rigida Mill. (0.35), P. leiophylla (0.50) and Picea martinezii T. F. Patterson (0.75) (Mosseler et al., 2000; Mosseler et al., 2004; Gómez-Jiménez et al., 2010; Flores-López et al., 2012). High II is due to high rates of self-pollination, which increases the presence of lethal recessive alleles that cause embryonic death (Bramlett, 1977). Although, based on the average values of II in the three evaluated years, the self-pollination rate and crossbreeding between related individuals was low. This was possibly due to crosses between unrelated trees.

The SWE shows differences (p ≤ 0.01) between production years and between trees. The average SWE during the three evaluated years was 9.5 mg (Tables 3, 4 and 5). This value was higher than that reported (8.7 mg) in P. patula at the state of Veracruz, Mexico, and even higher than the average (8.5 mg) at 16 natural locations of P. patula (Barrett, 1972; Mendizábal et al., 2006). Seed weight varied from 7 to 13, 7 to 11 and 7 to 12 mg in 2012, 2013 and 2014, each. Trees 62 and 74 had the highest values for this characteristic in 2012 and 2014 (Tables 3, 4 and 5). In contrast, tree 1 had the lowest weights throughout the three production years. The number of seeds per kg varied from 102, 653 to 110, 145. These values are within the average range of 92, 000 to 114, 000) seeds per kg recorded for P. patula in South Africa and Zimbabwe (Barnes and Mullin, 1974).

There were differences (p ≤ 0.01) in the RE between years and between trees (p ≤ 0.05). Trees 1 and 22 had maximum and minimum RE during 2012. The RE varied from 2 to 41 mg of seeds per g of cones in trees 1 and 2 in 2012. The average RE value in our study was similar (16) to that obtained in P. leiophylla, higher (3.3) in P. rigida (Mosseler et al., 2004; Gómez-Jiménez et al., 2010), and lower values (24 and 30) in Picea mexicana Martínez and Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb., which are species with light cones (Flores-López et al., 2005; Mápula-Larreta et al., 2007).

Although cones and seeds production expects to increase with age in P. patula trees, intensive management is recommended to promote cones production. Low pollen amount can lead to cones abortion; these require 80 % or more pollen on the fertile scales to maintain their development (Owens et al., 2005). Therefore, pollen recollection and storage may be a common practice in the P. patula orchards. Pollen availability will allow its immediate dispersion since female strobili would reach receptivity and ensure early pollination. This would stimulate cones development and the formation of a greater number of fertile scales and, therefore, increase the potential seeds number (Owens et al., 2005). Also, controlled breeding can be implemented in the P. patula trees to avoid self-fertilization, which is the main cause of vain seeds production and high inbreeding rates due to the increased probability of deleterious alleles to join in fertilization and form homozygous genotypes (Dogra, 1967, Hartl and Clark, 2007). Crossing between different individuals promotes full seeds formation (Owens et al., 2005). Irrigation can be part of the management to increase the synchrony between the receptivity of the female strobili and pollen release given that light irrigation can delay pollen dispersion (Owens et al., 2005). Fertilization and hormones application, such as gibberellic acid (AG4/7), can promote the flowering in Pinus trees (Ebell, 1972; Ross et al., 1985).

Conclusions

Pinus patula showed high variation in reproductive characteristics. The greatest source of variation in the characteristics was the trees, after the experimental error. The percentage of filled seeds varied between years; but a high number of seeds filled by cones were recorded in the three years. The low percentage of vain seeds and low inbreeding index indicates a low level of self-fertilization in the seed orchard.

Literatura Citada

Andersson, E. 1965. Cone and seed studies in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Stud. For. Suec. 23: 1-278. [ Links ]

Ávila-Flores, I. J., J. C. Hernández-Díaz, M. S. González-Elizondo, J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, and C. Wehenkel. 2016. Degree of hybridization in seed stands of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in the Sierra Madre Occidental, Durango, Mexico. PLoS ONE 11: e0152651. [ Links ]

Barnes, R. D., and L. J. Mullin, 1974. Flowering phenology and productivity in clonal seed orchards on Pinus patula, P. elliottii, P. taeda, and P. kesiya in Rhodesia. Forest Research Paper No. 3. Rhodesia Forestry Commission. 81 p. [ Links ]

Barrett, W. G. 1972. Variación de características morfológicas en poblaciones naturales de Pinus patula Schltdl. et Cham. en México. Suplemento Forestal 7, Institute for Domestic and Internal Affairs, Argentina. pp: 9-35. [ Links ]

Bonner, F. T. 1993. Análisis de Semillas Forestales. Serie de Apoyo Académico No. 47. División de Ciencias Forestales. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, México. 53 p. [ Links ]

Bramlett, D. L. 1977. Efficiency of seed production in southern, pine seed orchards, In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-50. USDA, Forest Service, St. Paul, MN. pp: 17-25. [ Links ]

Bramlett, D. L., E. W. Belcher Jr., G. L. DeBarr, G. D. Hertel, R. P. Karrfalt, C. W. Lantz, T. Miller, K. D. Ware, and H. O. Yates III. 1977. Cone analysis of southern pines: a guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-13. USDA, Forest Service. Asheville, NC. 28 p. [ Links ]

Bustamante-García, V., J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, E. Merlín-Bermudes, R. Álvarez-Zagoya, A. Carrillo-Parra, y J. C. Hernández-Díaz. 2012. Potencial y eficiencia de producción de semilla de Pinus engelmannii Carr., en tres rodales semilleros del estado de Durango, México. Madera Bosques 18: 7-21. [ Links ]

Bustamante-García, V., J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, A. Carrillo-Parra, R. Álvarez-Zagoya, H. González-Rodríguez, and J. J. Corral-Rivas. 2014. Seed production and quality of Pinus durangensis Mart., from seed areas and a seed stand in Durango, Mexico. Pak. J. Bot. 46: 1197-1202. [ Links ]

Castilleja S., P, P. Delgado V., C. Sáenz-Romero, and Y. Herrerías D. 2016. Reproductive success and inbreeding differ in fragmented populations of Pinus rzedowskii and Pinus ayacahuite var. veitchii, two endemic Mexican pines under threat. Forests 7: 1-17. [ Links ]

De Groot, P., and F. Schnekenburger. 1996. Cone traits of jack pine and black spruce in young seedling seed orchards. New For. 12: 279-291. [ Links ]

Dogra, P. D. 1967. Seed sterility and disturbances in embryogeny in conifers with particular reference to seed testing and tree breeding in Pinaceae. Stud. For. Suec. 15: 5-96. [ Links ]

Dvorak, W. S. 2002. Pinus patula Schiede & Schltdl. & Cham. In: Vozzo, J. (ed.). Tropical Tree Seed Manual. Agricultural Handbook 721. USDA, Forest Service. pp: 632-635. [ Links ]

Ebell, L. F. 1972. Cone-induction response of Douglas fir to form of nitrogen fertilizer and time of treatment. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 317-326. [ Links ]

Fernandes, L., M. Rocheta, J. Cordeiro, S. Pereira, S. Gerber, M. M. Oliveira, and M. M. Ribeiro. 2008. Genetic variation, mating patterns and gene flow in a Pinus pinaster Aiton clonal seed orchard. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 706. [ Links ]

Flores-López, C., J. López-Upton, y J. J. Vargas-Hernández. 2005. Indicadores reproductivos en poblaciones naturales de Picea mexicana Martínez. Agrociencia 39: 117-126. [ Links ]

Flores-López, C., C. G. Geada-López, J. López-Upton, y E. López-Ramírez. 2012. Producción de semillas e indicadores reproductivos en poblaciones naturales de Picea martinezii T. F. Patterson. Rev. For. Baracoa 31: 49-58. [ Links ]

Geary, T.F., y J. V. Pattinson. 1969. Seed production potential of cones of Pinus kesiya and P. patula in Central Africa. Rhod. J. Agric. Res. 7: 111-115. [ Links ]

Gómez-Jiménez, D. M., C. Ramírez-Herrera, J. Jasso-Mata, yJ. López-Upton. 2010. Variación en características reproductivas y germinación de semillas de Pinus leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 33: 297-304. [ Links ]

Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 2007. Principles of Population Genetics. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publisher. Sunderland, MA, U.S.A. 652 p. [ Links ]

Hernández-León S., D. S. Gernandt, J. A. Pérez de la Rosa, and L. Jardón-Barbolla. 2013. Phylogenetic relationship and species delimitation in Pinus section Trifoliae inferrred from plastid DNA. PLoS ONE 8: e70501. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070501 [ Links ]

Ladrach, W. E. 1985. Comparisons between provenances and sources of fourteen conifers in the Colombian Andes after five years. Research Report 102, Investigación Forestal. Cartón y Papel de Colombia. Cali, Colombia. 13 p. [ Links ]

Lyons, L. A. 1956. The seed production capacity and efficiency of red pine cones (Pinus resinosa). Can. J. Botany 34: 27-36. [ Links ]

Mápula-Larreta, M., J. López-Upton, J. J. Vargas-Hernández, and A. Hernández-Livera. 2007. Reproductive indicators in natural populations of Douglas-fir in Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 727-742. [ Links ]

Mendizábal H., L. C., J. Alba L., y M. I. Cabrera C. 2006. Variación de semillas de Pinus patula Schl. et Cham. con respecto a su posición en el fruto. Foresta Veracruzana 8: 13-16. [ Links ]

Morales-Velázquez, M. G., C. A. Ramírez-Mandujano, P. Delgado-Valerio, y J. López-Upton. 2010. Indicadores reproductivos de Pinus leiophylla Schltdl. et Cham. en la cuenca del río Angulo, Michoacán. Rev. Mex. Cien. For. 1: 31-38. [ Links ]

Morales G., E., J. López U., J. J. Vargas H., C. Ramírez H., y A. Gil M. 2013. Parámetros genéticos de Pinus patula en un ensayo de progenies establecido en dos altitudes. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 36: 155-162. [ Links ]

Mosseler, A., J. E. Major, J. D. Simpson, B. Daigle, K. Lange, Y. S. Park, K. H. Johnsen, and O. P. Rajora. 2000. Indicators of population viability in red spruce, Picea rubens. I. Reproductive traits and fecundity. Can. J. Bot. 78: 928-940. [ Links ]

Mosseler, A., O. P. Rajora, J. E. Major, and K. H. Kim. 2004. Reproductive and genetic characteristics of rare, disjunct pitch pine populations at the northern limits of its range in Canada. Conserv. Genet. 5: 571-583. [ Links ]

Owens, J. N., J. Bennett, and S. L’ Hirrondelle. 2005. Pollination and cone morphology affect cone and seed production in lodgepole pine seed orchards. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 383-400. [ Links ]

Owens, J. N., and D. D. Fernando. 2007. Pollination and seed production in western white pine. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 260-275. [ Links ]

Patiño V., F., and P. Y. Kageyama. 1991. Pinus patula, Schiede & Deppe. Seedleaflet No. 8A. Danish International development Agency (DANIDA), Forest Seed Centre. Humlebaek, Denmark. 25 p. [ Links ]

Perry, J. P. 1991. The Pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press. Portland, Oregon. 231 p. [ Links ]

Rajora, O.P., A. Mosseler, and J. E. Major. 2002. Mating system and reproductive fitness traits of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in large, central versus small, isolated, marginal populations. Can. J. Bot. 80: 1173-1184. [ Links ]

Ross, S.D., J. E. Webber. R. P. Pharis and J. N. Owens. 1985. Interaction between gibberellin A4/7 and root-pruning on the reproductive and vegetative process in Douglas fir. I. Effects on flowering. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 341-347. [ Links ]

Salaya, D., J. M., J. López U., y J. J. Vargas H. 2012. Variación genética y ambiental en dos ensayos de progenie de Pinus patula. Agrociencia 46: 519-534. [ Links ]

SAS Institute Inc., 2012 SAS version 9.4 for Windows. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA. Licensed to Colegio de Postgraduados, site 70070615. [ Links ]

Vargas H., J. J. 2003. Estado de la diversidad biológica de los árboles y bosques en el Norte de México. Documentos de Trabajo: Recursos Genéticos Forestales. FGR/60S. Servicio de Desarrollo de Recursos Forestales, Dirección de Recursos Forestales, FAO, Roma. 42 p. [ Links ]

Vela G., L. 1980. Contribución a la ecología de Pinus patula Schl. et Cham. Publicación Especial No. 19. INIF/SARH. México, D. F. 109 p. [ Links ]

Velázquez, M., A., G. Ángeles P., T. Llanderal O., A. Román J., and V. J. Reyes H. 2004. Monografía de Pinus patula. CONAFOR/Colegio de Postgraduados. México, D. F. 124 p. [ Links ]

Wachowiak, W., A. Lewandowski, and W. Prus-Gowacki. 2005. Reciprocal controlled crosses between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo verified by a species-specific cpDNA marker. J. Appl. Genet. 46: 41-43. [ Links ]

White, T. L., W. T. Adams, and D. B. Neale. 2007. Forest Genetics. CAB International. London, UK. 682 p. [ Links ]

Wormald, T. J. 1975. Pinus patula. Tropical Forestry 7. Department of Forestry, Commonwealth Forestry Institute. Oxford, UK. 212 p. [ Links ]

Received: August 01, 2016; Accepted: April 01, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons