SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.51 número4Producción de pimiento morrón (Capsicum annuum L.) en ciclos cortosProyección explícita e implícita del rendimiento maderable de plantaciones forestales comerciales de Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Agrociencia

versão On-line ISSN 2521-9766versão impressa ISSN 1405-3195

Agrociencia vol.51 no.4 Texcoco Mai./Jun. 2017

 

Plant protection

Pupation, adult emergence and oviposition of Comadia redtenbacheri (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) in the nursery

Isis Delgado-Tejeda1 

Celina Llanderal-Cázares1  * 

Kalina Miranda-Perkins2 

Héctor M. De los Santos-Posadas1 

1Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. 56230. Montecillo, Estado de México.

2Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Avenida Insurgentes Sur 1582. 03940. Colonia Crédito Constructor, Delegación Benito Juárez, CDMX.


Abstract

To determine conditions for establishing Comadia redtenbacheri (Hammerschmidt) cultures in a nursery, tests on production of the insect were conducted. Pots that contained loam soil and five agave plants approximately three years old were used. On these plants, larvae (>0.30 g) were released to induce pupation and adult emergence. The larvae were placed at densities of 200, 400 and 600 per pot with three replications distributed at random. To quantify adult emergence and oviposition on the agaves, pupal exuviae were counted and egg masses were weighed. Numbers of emerged adults were different: 15.9 % in pots with 600 larvae, 1.1 % with 400 larvae and 5.3 % with 200 larvae (p≤0.05). Weight of egg masses were also different: 0.9609 g with 600 larvae, 0.1257 g with 400 larvae and 0.2694 g with 200 larvae (p≤0.05).

Key words: Comadia redtenbacheri; Agave salmiana; maguey red worm; entomophagia; insect rearing

Resumen

Para determinar las condiciones para el establecimiento de cultivos en vivero de Comadia redtenbacheri (Hammerschmidt) se hicieron pruebas de producción del insecto. En macetas con suelo franco y cinco plantas de agave, de aproximadamente tres años, se liberaron larvas, con peso >0.30 g, se indujo la pupación y emergencia de los adultos. Las larvas se colocaron a densidades de 200, 400 y 600 por maceta con tres repeticiones distribuidas al azar. Para cuantificar la emergencia de los adultos y oviposición sobre los agaves se contaron las exuvias pupales y se pesaron las masas de huevos. El número de adultos emergidos fue diferente: 15.9 % en las macetas con 600 larvas, 1.1 % con 400 larvas y 5.3 % con 200 larvas (p≤0.05). Las masas ovipositadas también fueron diferentes: 0.9609 g con 600 larvas, 0.1257 g con 400 y 0.2694 g para 200 larvas (p≤0.05).

Palabras clave: Comadia redtenbacheri; Agave salmiana; gusano rojo de maguey; entomofagia; cría de insectos

Introduction

Around 1900 insect species are used as human food around the world (van Huis, 2013) and contribute significantly to local economies (DeFoliart, 1999). In Mexico, 535 insect species are reported to be edible (Ramos-Elorduy et al., 2008). Among these is Comadia redtenbacheri (Hammerschmidt), a lepidopteran of the Cossidae family, which is one of the four major wood borer families (Kalisch and Baxendale, 2010). C. redtenbacheri is the only species of the family reported in Mexico (Brown, 1976). Its main host species are pulque agaves, Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm, A. mapisaga Trel. and A. atrovirens Karw. ex Salm (Camacho et al., 2003). Female C. redtenbacheri oviposit masses of eggs at the base of the agave leaves. The period of incubation is 30 to 35 d. After hatching, the larvae establish in the agave rhizome where they complete their development (Granados 1993), passing through seven larval instars (Hernández-Livera et al., 2005) over a period of five months in a greenhouse and eight in the field (Llanderal-Cázares et al., 2007). Comadia redtenbacheri larvae, called maguey red worm, is regarded as human food and in the laboratory the pupation period is five months in a 5-cm deep substrate of equal parts of soil and vermiculite (Miranda-Perkins et al., 2013). Adult longevity is only 3 to 5 d because their mouth apparatus is atrophied and they cannot feed (Hernández-Livera et al., 2005; Llanderal-Cázares et al., 2007).

The fresh maguey red worm in the tourist area of Otumba and Teothihuacán, Estado de Mexico, has a price of $500.00 pesos a kilogram during the collection season and $700.00 during the months of low production (Miranda et al., 2011). But Camacho et al. (2005) report prices of $800.00 to $1000.00 kg-1.

Most edible insects are harvested from wild populations (van Huis, 2013), and in the case of the maguey red worm, gatherers take advantage of its natural behavior for harvesting the worm during the rainy season from July to September, when the water stimulates the last instar larvae, ready to pupate, to leave the maguey. But the typical gathering procedure is to locate infested plants and extract the larvae even though they have not finished their development, causing wild populations to diminish (Granados, 1993; Miranda et al., 2011). The procedure also affects the agave populations; plants are damaged and replanting practices are non-existent (Ramos-Elorduy, 2006; Llanderal-Cázares et al., 2010).

Nolasco et al. (2002) and Camacho et al. (2005) attempted establishing C. redtenbacheri at different development stages under controlled conditions. Llanderal-Cázares et al. (2010) reported establishment and development of C. redtenbacheri larval stages up to the pupation stage on agave plants grown in a greenhouse. In the laboratory, the processes of pupation, mating, oviposition and hatching were obtained (Miranda-Perkins and Llanderal-Cázares, 2013; Miranda-Perkins et al., 2016).

van Huis et al. (2013) believe that insect rearing under controlled conditions can help to prevent overexploitation in nature and propose that in the tropics emphasis should be on optimizing the productivity of traditional systems by developing procedures for managing the resource in small-scale rearing installations.

Thus, the objective of this study was to establish C. redtenbacheri rearing conditions in pots in which A. salmiana agave plants had been established to determine what number of larvae released per pot would obtain the highest percentages of pupation, adult emergence and oviposition.

Materials and Methods

Biological material

Collection and establishment of A. salmiana plants

In Teotihuacán, Estado de Mexico (19° 41’ 23” N and 98° 51’ 39” W, altitude 2272 m), 45 A. salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck plants approximately three years old were collected. These plants are generally infested by C. redtenbacheri larvae in the field. The agaves exhibited signs of weakness, such as pale, yellowing or dry leaves, which, according to Kalisch and Baxendale (2010), make them preferred hosts of the borers. Some of them were also selected because some of their peripheral leaves were decomposing.

In February 2014 the agaves were established in a nursery covered with 40 % shade cloth on the Montecillo Campus of the Colegio de Postgraduados, Estado de Mexico. The 45 agaves were replanted in nine plastic pots, 122×122×30 cm, containing loam soil up to 20 cm. The soil was from the same nursery, since Miranda-Perkins et al. (2013) compared different substrates for pupation and adult emergence of the maguey red worm and observed that the larvae are highly capable of pupating in different types of substrates. The pots were placed on 1.10 m high tables to keep them far from predators during experimentation. Irrigation was applied once a week for three weeks during plant establishment and was suspended when the agaves began to root. The maguey plants were kept outdoors for eight months until use.

Procurement and selection of C. redtenbacheri larvae

Larvae from Tulancingo, Hidalgo, were acquired on August 26 and September 12, 2014. The sample was classified as commercial, meaning that, according to Miranda-Perkins et al. (2013), the organisms were extracted from the agave rhizome and manipulated with no particular care during the process of gathering, collection and distribution. The selected larvae weighed >0.30 (fifth instar) and, according to Miranda-Perkins et al. (2013), can achieve pupation if they are provided with a suitable substrate. For this study, healthy larvae, with no sign of parasitism or damage by pathogens, following the criteria of Zetina and Llanderal (2014), were selected and kept in the Laboratory of Insect Physiology of the Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo. Pieces of A. salmiana in trays were offered as food. Larvae that had abnormal behavior and dead larvae were discarded.

Larva pupation, adult emergence and oviposition

In September 2014, the selected C. redtenbacheri larvae were placed in pots containing the agaves at densities of 200, 400 and 600 organisms per pot, with three replications distributed randomly, under the assumption that the larger the number of larvae induced to pupate, the more adults will emerge. Pot soil was removed from the surface with a shovel, and the larvae were distributed over the soil in groups of approximately 50 individuals until the entire surface of the soil in the pot was covered. Once the larvae burrowed into the soil, the procedure was repeated until the number corresponding to each treatment was completed. After this, the pot was covered, from its base to a height of 80 cm with a cage made of smooth organza to protect larvae against predators. The cage was removed once the larvae no longer exited the soil.

Pupation lasted five months in the laboratory (Miranda Perkins et al., 2013), and after this time, in February 2015 the organza cages were again placed over the pots to maintain in confinement the adults that emerged, mated and oviposited on the available agaves. In May 2015, at the end of emergence, when no live adults were observed, the dead were removed from the cages and adult emergence was assessed by counting and sexing the pupal exuviae present on the surface of the soil of each pot. Also, we collected egg masses oviposited at the base of the agave leaves selected by the females, they were weighed for each experimental unit and based on average egg weight, the number of eggs on masses oviposited was calculated. This number represents the potential number of individuals of the following generation. The soil was sifted to locate the remaining larvae or pupae and to detect the reason why adults did not emerge. The experiment was conducted outdoors, and so there was no control of the environmental conditions.

Statistical analyses were carried out with SAS for Windows 9.00 (2002). To compare the number of emerged adults, the Poisson regression was used, estimating maximum likelihood with the GENMOD procedure (p≤0.05). The data on weight of oviposited egg masses were analyzed with the GLM procedure and means were compared with the Tukey test (p≤0.05).

Results and Discussion

The pupation process of C. redtenbacheri in the nursery began in September 2014 and concluded in March 2015 with the beginning of adult emergence, which lasted until May of the same year. When 600 larvae/pot were released, average emergence of 15.9 % was obtained and this was the best condition (p≤0.001); with the density of 400 larvae/pot, average emergence was 1.1 % and 5.3 % with 200 larvae/pot (Table 1).

Table 1 Average number of C. redtenbacheri adults emerged, by larval density, using Poisson regression test. 

By sexing the pupal exuviae of the emerged adults, we found that a little more than half were females for the three larval densities used: 48 females and 46 males (600), 2 females and 2 males (400) and 6 females and 4 males (200). Considering that each female can produce 104 descendants on average (Ramírez-Cruz and Llanderal-Cázares, 2015), the 48 females in the density of 600 larvae/pot could yield 4992 larvae, sufficient to infest the available agaves.

Camacho et al. (2003), in an outdoor study, placed C. redtenbacheri larvae to pupate and obtained 15 % emergence; they inferred that the low percentage was due to drastic changes in light and temperature. In our study, the low emergence may have been due to excessive moisture in the pots from water retained by the soil due to rain during the time the experiment lasted, which was difficult to drain because of the size of the pots, and this may have induced the larvae that were inside their cocoons to exit again to search for another site for pupation. Miranda-Perkins et al. (2013) reported that when moisture was not provided to the larvae, adult emergence increased 50 %. Another cause of low emergence may have been the origin of the larvae. When larvae are from commercial samples, adult emergence is reduced 50 %. In insect rearing direct manipulation of the larvae should be minimal during their entire development to avoid causing stress (Madrigal 2001).

The presence of entomopathogens in the soil used as substrate for pupation may also have had an important role in the low percentage of emergence. When the soil of the nine pots was sifted, we recovered 995 individuals in different stages of development, from larvae, prepupae (the great majority), and pupae to term. It is likely that an attack of entomopathogens would impede larvae from reaching the pupa stage, and if they do pupate, they are prevented from complete development into adults. Of the individuals recovered, 10 samples were analyzed, and fungi of the genera Rhizopus, Penicillium and Aspergillus were found. These are often found as pathogens in insect rearing (Shapiro, 1984). Rhyzopus stolonifer (Ehrenberg: Fries) Vuillemin is a saprophyte in the soil and has been found in diets for silk worms Bombyx mori L. (Trivedy et al., 2011). Miranda-Perkins et al. (2013) recorded that nearly 40 % of the C. redtenbacheri larvae deposited in the soil for pupation were infected by Beauveria spp., and Hernández-Flores et al. (2015) reported C. redtenbacheri larvae associated with several genera of bacteria.

Although disease transmission intensity in insect populations is proportional to the number of susceptible individuals and to the increase in stress associated with high population densities (Steinhaus, 1958; Vilaplana et al., 2008), there are examples of insects that exhibit phenotypic plasticity in response to changes in population density, a phenomenon called denso-dependent prophylaxis (Simpson et al., 2001). For example, when Schistocerca gregaria are found in high densities, they are more resistant to the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae than solitary locusts, due to a potentiated antimicrobial activity in their defense systems (Wilson et al., 2002). This characteristic could have occurred in the case of C. redtenbacheri, since a higher rate of emergence occurred at the highest density (600 larvae per pot).

For weight of oviposited egg masses, the best treatment was the density of 600 larvae (p≤0.013), relative to the other densities evaluated (Table 2), obtaining an average of 0.961 g, which, when divided by the calculated average weight of each egg (0.00056 g), results in an equivalent of 1715 eggs. This translates as the number of potential larvae: almost the same number (95 %) of the larvae obtained initially in the three replications (1800). Under a management system, even if a third of the eggs were not fertile and if the surviving larvae established in the agaves and continued their development, in the following generations, the adults could accomplish a new infestation of the agaves available in the area destined to that end.

Table 2 Average weight of egg masses of C. redtenbacheri, by larval density. 

Values with different letters are statistically different (Tukey; p≤0.05).

Because the highest percentage of adult emergence and oviposition were observed in the treatment with the largest number of larvae (600), it is advisable to increase the density of individuals in other experiments to obtain higher production in the same area. Thus, the rearing system would be more efficient; besides, non-commercial larvae should be used.

Conclusions

Comadia redtenbacheri establishment in the nursery was possible by releasing larvae on agave plants growing in pots and kept outdoors. Pupation, adult emergence and oviposition on the available agave plants was achieved with the densities used. The best result was obtained with the density of 600 larvae per pot. In further studies, the species should continue its development so that in the following generation, the larvae that hatch from the egg masses can establish on their own in the available agave plants. The use of higher densities of larvae per unit of area for initial infestation could result in higher adult emergence and oviposition

Literatura Citada

Brown R., M. 1976. A revision of the North American Comadia (Cossidae). J. Res. Lepid. 14: 189-212. [ Links ]

Camacho, A. D., A.Sánchez H., J. E. Jiménez L., y A. Nolasco M. 2003. Observaciones en condiciones de laboratorio de la biología del “gusano rojo del maguey” Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mex. 2: 281-287. [ Links ]

Camacho, A.D., A. Nolasco M., J. E. Jiménez-Luna, y F. Rivera-Torres. 2005. Reintroducción de maguey y cultivo del gusano rojo Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mex. 4: 599-603. [ Links ]

DeFoliart, G. R. 1999. Insects as food: why the western attitude is important. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 21-50. [ Links ]

Granados, D. S. 1993. Los Agaves en México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, México. 252 p. [ Links ]

Hernández-Flores, L., C. Llanderal-Cázares, A. W. Guzmán-Franco, and S. Aranda-Ocampo. 2015. Bacteria present in Comadia redtenbacheri larvae (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). J. Med. Entomol. 52: 1150-1158. [ Links ]

Hernández-Livera R. A., C. Llanderal-Cázares , E. Castillo-Márquez, J. Valdez-Carrasco, y R. Nieto-Hernández. 2005. Identificación de instares larvales de Comadia redtenbacheri (Hamm) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Agrociencia 39: 539-544. [ Links ]

Kalisch, J. A., and F. P. Baxendale. 2010. Insects borers of shade trees and woody ornamentals. EC1518. University of Nebraska, Cooperative. Extension. 8 p. [ Links ]

Llanderal-Cázares C., R. Nieto-Hernández , I. Almanza-Valenzuela, y C. Ortega-Álvarez. 2007. Biología y comportamiento de Comadia redtenbacheri (Hamm) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mex . 6: 252-255. [ Links ]

Llanderal-Cázares C., H. M. De los Santos-Posadas, E.I.Almanza-Valenzuela, R.Nieto-Hernández, y C.Castillejos-Cruz . 2010. Establecimiento de larvas de Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm. en plantas de maguey en invernadero. Acta Zool. Mex. 26: 25-31. [ Links ]

Madrigal, A. 2001. Cría de insectos en laboratorio. In: Madrigal, A.C. (ed.). Fundamentos de Control Biológico de Plagas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. pp: 266-295. [ Links ]

Miranda G., B. Quintero, y B. Ramos. 2011. La recolección de insectos con fines alimenticios en la zona turística de Otumba y Teotihuacán, en el Estado de México. Rev. Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 9: 81-568. [ Links ]

Miranda-Perkins K., yC. Llanderal-Cázares . 2013. Cruzas con diferente proporción de sexos en Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm. Entomol. Mex . 12: 530-533. [ Links ]

Miranda-Perkins, K., C. Llanderal-Cázares , H. M. De los Santos-Posadas, L.Portillo-Martínez, and A. L. Vigueras-Guzmán. 2013. Comadia redtenbacheri (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) pupal development in the laboratory. Fla. Entomol. 96: 1424-1433. [ Links ]

Miranda-Perkins, K., C. Llanderal-Cázares , M. Cadena-Barajas, and J. López-Sauceda. 2016. Adult emergence and reproductive behavior of Comadia redtenbacheri in confinement. Southwestern Entomol. 41: 657-665. [ Links ]

Nolasco M. A., J. E. Jiménez-Luna ., y Camacho A. D. 2002. Inducción a la pupación y colonización del gusano rojo del maguey Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mex . 1: 125-130. [ Links ]

Ramírez-Cruz, A., yC. Llanderal-Cázares . 2015. Morfología del sistema reproductor de la hembra de Comadia redtenbacheri(Hammerschmidt) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Acta Zool. Mex . (n. s.) 31: 431-435. [ Links ]

Ramos-Elorduy, J. 2006. Threatened edible insects in Hidalgo, México and some measures to preserve them. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2: 1-10 [ Links ]

Ramos-Elorduy J., J. M. Pino, y V. H. Martínez C. 2008. Base de Datos de los Insectos Comestibles de México. UNIOBIO-IBUNAM. 78 p. [ Links ]

SAS Institute. 2002. The SAS system for Windows. Release 6.2.9200. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA. [ Links ]

Shapiro, M. 1984. Microorganisms as contaminants and pathogens in insect rearing. In: King, E. G., and N. C. Leplla (eds). Advances and Challenges in Insect Rearing. USDA. Washington, D. C. pp: 130-142. [ Links ]

Simpson S. J, E. Despland, B. F Hagele, and T. Dodgson. 2001. Gregarious behavior in desert locusts is evoked by touching their back legs. Proc. Nat. Academy Sci. 98: 3895-3897. [ Links ]

Stamp, N. E. 1980. Egg deposition patterns in butterflies: Why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Amer. Nat. 115: 367-380. [ Links ]

Steinhaus, E. A. 1958. Crowding as a possible stress factor in insect diseases. Ecology 39: 503-514. [ Links ]

Trivedy, K., K. S Nirmal, N. Vinutha, and S. M. H. Qadri, 2011. In vitro testing of common disinfectants used in sericulture to control the growth of fungi in rearing houses. Res. J. Microbiol. 6: 439-465. [ Links ]

van Huis, A. 2013. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu. Rev. Entomol . 58: 563-583. [ Links ]

van Huis, A., J. Itterbeeck V., H. Klunder, E. Mertens, A. Halloran, G. Muir, and P. Vantomme. 2013. Edible Insects - Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security. FAO Forestry Paper. Roma. 171 p. [ Links ]

Vilaplana, L., E. M. Redman, K. Wilson, and J. S. Cory. 2008. Density related variation in vertical transmission of a virus in the African armyworm. Oecologia 155: 237-246. [ Links ]

Wilson, K., M. Thomas, S. Blanford, M. Doggett, S. Simpson, and S. Moore. 2002. Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proc. Nat. Academy Sci . 99: 5471-5475. [ Links ]

Zetina, D. H., andC. Llanderal-Cázares . 2014. Signs and symptoms in Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) larvae affected by parasitoids. Southwest. Entomol. 39: 285-290. [ Links ]

Received: April 2016; Accepted: December 2016

*Author for correspondence: llcelina@colpos.mx

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons