SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número3Simulación de un impuesto al CO 2 e para mitigar los impactos del sector agropecuario chileno sobre el cambio climáticoEmisión de metano en los sistemas de producción de leche bovina en el Valle de San Luis Potosí, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Agrociencia

versión On-line ISSN 2521-9766versión impresa ISSN 1405-3195

Agrociencia vol.50 no.3 Texcoco abr./may. 2016

 

Animal science

Effect of a single injection of progesterone five days after insemination on dairy cow fertility

Carlos I. Roque-Velázquez1 

Hugo H. Montaldo-Valdenegro1 

Carlos G. Gutiérrez-Aguilar1 

Joel Hernández-Cerón1  * 

1Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, D.F., 04510.


Abstract

A positive association was found between progesterone concentrations on days 5 and 7 of the estrous cycle and embryo survival. Addition of progesterone between days 5 and 9 post-insemination favored embryo development and the same treatment had no effect when applied between days 12 and 16. This study tested whether a single injection of progesterone 5 d after insemination increases conception rate (CR) in dairy cows. For the experiment, 855 cows with different number of inseminations and parturitions were used. The cows were assigned randomly to one of two treatments 5 d after insemination: P4 (n=427) received an intramuscular injection of 500 mg progesterone; control (n=428) did not receive progesterone. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal palpation between days 40 and 50 post-insemination. The concentrations of progesterone were determined by radioimmunoassay in six cows of each group during 7 days as of day five post-insemination. CR was compared using logistic regression analysis. The independent variables were treatment, days in milk (<90, 90 to 150 and >150 d), number of parturitions (primiparous compared with multiparous), type of Puerperium (normal compared with pathological), body condition score <2.5 or >2.5) and type of estrus (natural, Ovsynch and PGF2 α). Progesterone concentrations were compared by a linear model for repeated measurements. CR (р = 0.39) for cows of group P4 (32 %) was similar to that of control cows (29%). No effect of interaction (p>0.10) of treatment with other independent variables was detected. Group P4 cows had higher concentrations (p<0.05) of progesterone 48 һ after treatment. The progesterone injection 5 d after insemination does not improve CR in dairy cows.

Key words: Fertility; progesterone; dairy cows

Resumen

Asociación positiva se ha encontrado entre las concentraciones de progesterona en los días 5 y 7 del ciclo estral y la sobrevivencia embrionaria. La adición de progesterona entre los días 5 y 9 posinseminación favoreció el desarrollo embrionario y el mismo tratamiento no tuvo efecto cuando se aplicaó entre los días 12 y 16. En este estudio se probó si una inyección única de progesterona 5 d después de la inseminación incrementa el porcentaje de concepción (PC) en vacas lecheras. Para el experimento se usaron 855 vacas con número diferente de servicios y partos. Las vacas se asignaron al azar a dos tratamientos 5 d después de la inseminación: P4 (n=427), recibieron una inyección intramuscular de 500 mg de progesterona; testigo (n=428), no recibieron progesterona. El diagnóstico de gestación se realizó mediante palpación transrectal entre los 40 y 50 d posinseminación. Las concentraciones de progesterona se determinaron mediante radioinmunoanálisis en seis vacas de cada grupo durante 7 d desde el quinto día posterior a la inseminación. El PC se comparó mediante un análisis de regresión logística. Las variables independientes fueron tratamiento, días en leche (<90, 90 a 150 y >150 d), número de partos (primíparas en comparación con multíparas), tipo de puerperio (normal en comparación con patológico), condición corporal (≤2.5 o >2.5) y tipo de estro (natural, Ovsynch y PGF2α). Las concentraciones de progesterona se compararon mediante un modelo lineal para mediciones repetidas. El PC fue similar (p=0.39) en las vacas del grupo P4 (32 %) y el testigo (29 %). No se detectó efecto de interacción de tratamiento en las otras variables independientes (p>0.10). Las vacas del grupo P4 tuvieron concentraciones mayores (p≤0.05) de progesterona en las 48 h después del tratamiento. La inyección de progesterona 5 d después de la inseminación no mejora el PC en vacas lecheras.

Palabras clave: Fertilidad; progesterona; vacas lecheras

Introduction

Low fertility in dairy cows is due to high incidence of early embryo death (Diskin et al., 2006). One of the causes is related to delay in embryo development and the subsequent

reduction in interferon- τ secretion, causing failure of luteolysis inhibition (Mann and Lamming, 2001). Delay in embryo development and the subsequent reduction in interferon-τ secretion, causing failure of luteolysis inhibition (Mann and Lamming, 2001). Delay in embryo development may be determined by diminishing progesterone serum concentrations (Mann and Lamming, 2001; Leroy et al, 2008). High-producing dairy cows have lower progesterone levels because the corpus luteum produces less progesterone (Stronge et al., 2005) and because they catabolize steroid hormones more rapidly (Sangsritavong et al., 2002; Vasconcelos et al, 2003).

Progesterone addition has favored embryo development and secretion of interferon- τ (Mann and Lamming, 1999; Mann et al, 2006; Carter et al., 2008). In practice, there are several approaches to increasing progesterone serum levels and, thus, improving the proportion of pregnant cows (conception rate). Progesterone is administered using implants or intravaginal devices with variable results (Mann and Lamming, 1999; Larson et al, 2007; Friedman et al., 2012). Increased progesterone blood concentrations and conception rate are achieved by inducing formation of an accessory corpus luteum by injecting hCG five days after insemination (Santos et al, 2001; Urzúa et al, 2009; Nascimento et al, 2013).

Response to progesterone depends on the time elapsed after insemination. Thus, if progesterone is added between days 5 and 9 after insemination, there is a favorable effect on embryo development and interferon- τ secretion. In contrast, the same treatment has no effect when applied between days 12 and 16 (Mann and Lamming, 1999; Mann et al., 2006). Moreover, there is a positive association between concentrations of progesterone during days 5 to 7 of the estrous cycle and embryo survival (Stronge et al, 2005). Macmillan and Peterson (1993) observed that insertion of a progesterone release device from day 6 to 8 post-insemination increased fertility, but after this time, insertion had no favorable effect. These observations suggest that there is a physiological period in which an increase in progesterone serum levels can favor embryo survival and, consequently, fertility. One way to increase progesterone blood concentration is through the use of intravaginal devices that release this hormone. These devices, however, result in marginal blood progesterone increases of 0.8 to 1 ng mL-1 (Cerri et al., 2009; Lima et al., 2009) in high-producing cows. An injection of 500 mg progesterone in lactating cows increases blood concentrations of this hormone more than 1 ng mL-1 and lasts 48 to 72 h (Flores et al, 2013). The objective of this study was to test whether an intramuscular injection of 500 mg progesterone 5 d after insemination increases conception rate in dairy cows.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted from August to December in a dairy herd located on the central high plateau of Mexico. The climate of the region is temperate subhumid with an annual average temperature of 15.5 °С and mean annual rainfall of 861 mm.

Reproductive management of the herd

The stable has 2350 producing cows in a management system of three milkings a day. Average production per lactation is 10 500 kg. For the experiment, 855 cows with different numbers of parturitions and inseminations were used. They were fed a mixed ration, balanced according to the recommendations of the NRC (National Research Council, 2001).

Examination for diagnosis and treatment of Puerperium pathologies was performed in the first 10 d postpartum. Specific pharmacological treatments were applied for each case. From day 25 to 32 postpartum, all the cows received a luteolithic dose of PGF2α (Celosil, MSD Animal Health), which was repeated on another two occasions with a 14-day interval. The cows that exhibited estrus after the second or third injection of PGF2α were inseminated with semen from bulls of proven fertility. The cows that did not exhibit estrus after the third PGF2α injection were enrolled in a synchronized ovulation protocol and fixed time insemination (Ovsynch Program).

Heat was detected by visual observation and pedometers. Both inseminated cows showing signs of estrus and fixed-time insemination cows were inseminated only when cervical mucous discharge and turgid uterus appeared.

Study design

On the fifth day after insemination, the cows were assigned randomly to one of two treatments: P4 (n=427) received one intramuscular injection of 500 mg progesterone (Progesterone, Pfizer Animai Health) and the control (n=428) received no progesterone. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal palpation between days 40 and 50 post-insemination. The interval of return to estrus was recorded and classified as normal (18 to 24 d), short (< 17 d), long (25 to 35 d), double (36 to 48 d) and more than 48 d (Tixi et al, 2009a). In addition, six animals of each group were selected to extract blood samples during 7 d as of the fifth day post-insemination. The samples were collected in vacuum tubes with sodium EDTA and centrifuged at 1500 for 20 minutes. The separated plasma was preserved frozen (-20 °С) until analysis. Progesterone concentrations were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay (Coat-A-Count Progesterone Diagnostic Product Corporation, USA) with a sensitivity of 0.02 ng ուL-1 and intra-assay variation of 9.38 %.

Statistical analysis

The conception rate was compared between treatments using logistic regression analysis with JMP software. The independent variables were treatment, days in milk (<90, 90 to 150 and > 150 d), parturition number (primiparous or multiparous), Puerperium type (normal or pathological), body condition score at the time of treatment (≤2.5 or >2.5), and estrus type (natural, Ovsynch and PGF2α).

Progesterone concentrations were compared using the linear model for repeated measurements with the MIXED procedure of SAS, with restricted maximum likelihood.

Results and Discussion

The conception rate was no afected by injection of progesterone (Table 1). Injection 5 d after insemination caused a transient increase in blood during the following 48 h, relative to the control cows (Figure 1; p≤0.05). The interactions between variables were not significant (p>0.10). In this study we proposed that a temporary increase in the progesterone serum levels during early diestrus could favor fertility. This was supported by studies that found a positive association between progesterone concentrations from days 5 to 9 and embryo development (Macmillan and Peterson, 1993; Stronge et al, 2005; Mann et al, 2006). The absence of effect of the proposed treatment in this study may be due to the method of progesterone administration. In the cited studies (Macmillan and Peterson, 1993; Mann et al, 2006), progesterone was administered using an intravaginal device, which caused a sustained increase in blood concentrations. In our study, the increase observed was abrupt during the 24 h following the injection and during the subsequent 48 h there was a rapid fall. To maintain high levels of progesterone during the period referred to in the cited studies, a second injection 48 h later or a different mode of application, subcutaneous for example, would permit slower absorption of the hormone.

Table 1 Odds ratio for conception probability, according to the variables in the logistic regression model. 

*Conception rate.

**Only first service cows are included.

Figure 1 Blood progesterone concentrations (mean ± standard error) of cows treated with 500 mg intramuscular progesterone (-О-) at day five after insemination and of control cows (-□-). 

The treatments based on increasing blood progesterone concentrations, by supplementation or by inducing formation of an accessory corpus luteum, have had varying results, associated with characteristics of sub-populations of treated cows. Friedman et al. (2012) observed that progesterone supplementation increased fertility only in cows with a low body condition score and in cows with postpartum reproductive pathologies. Santos et al. (2001) and Urzúa et al. (2009) observed that cows that responded favorably to treatment with hCG 5 d after insemination were first service cows and, particularly, those that lost body condition in the 30 d following insemination. In our study, the effect of the interaction treatment X body condition was not observed; body condition dynamics after treatment was not quantified (Table 1).

Days in milk, number of parturitions, type of estrus and characteristics of Puerperium affected conception rate, but the interaction of these variables with the treatment (p≥0.10) was not observed. Likelihood of pregnancy was lower in cows inseminated 90 to 150 and > 150 d in milk than in cows inseminated the first 90 d (Table 1). This indicates that the most fertile cows were those that were inseminated during the first 90 d postpartum. This result is relevant because it contrasts with Tixi et al. (2009b), who obtained higher conception rates as time from calving elapsed. In this way, in the cited study the most fertile cows were those that were inseminated in their third and fourth services. In our study, the conception rate of cows with more than 150 d in milk was 14 % lower than that of cows in their first 90 d (22 % vs 36 %). The reason for this result could be that repeat-breeding cows are concentrated in the group inseminated after 150 d in milk. Thus, this group had already been selected because they suffered from diverse problems that cause fertilization failure and embryo death (Fourichon et al., 2000; Walsh et al., 2011).

In our study, primiparous cows had a higher conception rate than multiparous cows (Table 1). The cause of higher fertility of primiparous cows is not clear. It may be related to higher production and dry matter intake of the multiparous cows, compared with primiparous cows (Berry et al, 2006). Thus, multiparous cows would be more susceptible to the negative effects of subnormal concentrations of progesterone because of greater hepatic catabolism of steroid hormones (Sangsritavong etal, 2002). In addition, it is possible that the multiparous cows are exposed to more factors that decrease fertility, such as dystocia, Puerperium pathologies and metabolic problems, than primiparous cows (Gröhn and Rajala-Schultz, 2000; López-Gatius et al, 2006).

The Ovsynch protocol produced a higher conception rate than when insemination was performed at detected estrus (natural or PGF2a induced; Table 1). All the inseminations were performed after confirming genital signs of estrus, even in the Ovsynch protocol cows. In this context, the Ovsynch protocol cows may have been more fertile due to better synchronization between ovulation and insemination; cows in anestrus were not inseminated and the ovulatory follicle had fewer days of dominance (Pursley et al, 1995).

The effect of the treatment on follicle dynamics was not measured in this study. However, the acute increase in blood progesterone concentrations causes atresia of the dominant follicle and emergence of a new follicular wave (Ahman et al, 1997; Diaz et al, 1998). Thus, the injection of progesterone could have induced atresia of the dominant follicle on day five, early emergence of the second follicular wave and an estrous cycle with three follicular waves, and thus a longer luteum phase (Bergfeld et al, 1996; García et al, 2004). In our study, the estrous cycle of progesterone treated cows was similar (p>0.10) to that of control cows (P4 = 21.2±1.8 and control = 21.9 ± 1.6 days), suggesting that if there was an effect on follicular dynamics, it was not reflected in the duration of the luteum phase or the estrous cycle.

Another effect of modifying follicular dynamics following progesterone injection would be that the cows that did not conceive during the experimental cycle had a higher probability of conceiving in the following estrous cycle since, having three follicular waves, a follicle would be ovulating with fewer days of dominance. This would increase the potential of the oocyte to develop a viable embryo (Ahman et al, 1997). However, the conception rate of the cows that returned to estrus within a normal interval (18 to 24 d) was 36 and 29 % (p = 0.31) for the P4 groups and the control. In contrast, Flores et al. (2013) found that progesterone-treated cows under a similar protocol had a higher conception rate in the return to estrus than control cows.

After insemination, it is expected that all the cows that did not conceive would return to estrus within a normal period (18 to 24 d). However, some cows return in periods that are shorter (<17 d), longer (25 to 35 d), or double (36 a 48 d) (Tixi et al., 2009a). Determining the intervals between services is a practical method to evaluate efficiency and precision in detecting estrus since it permits estimating the proportion of cows that were inseminated when they were not in estrus (short intervals) and the proportion of non-pregnant cows not detected when they returned to estrus. The main cause of long intervals is mainly the low efficiency in estrus detection. However, other factors may be involved, such as persistence of the corpus luteum and early embryo death (López-Gatius et al., 2002; Starbuck et al., 2004). In our study, the distribution of intervals between services of the P4 groups was similar to that of the control group (data not shown). The variation in conception rate obtained with cows returning to estrus when their intervals were different (Table 2) was notable. The cows with the highest conception rate were those that were inseminated after a normal interval, while the least fertile were those that were inseminated after a short or double interval. The causes of low fertility in these cows cannot be established with the observations made in this study.

Table 2 Return to estrus intervals after experimental insemination (data include cows from both groups). 

Conclusions

Administration of progesterone 5 days after insemination did not increase conception rate of dairy cows.

Literatura Citada

Ahman, N., E. C. Townsend, R. A. Dailey, and E. K. Inskeep . 1997. Relationships of hormonal patterns and fertility to occurrence of two or three waves of ovarian follicles before and after breeding, in beef cow and heifers. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 49: 13-28. [ Links ]

Bergfeld, E. G. M., F. N. Kojima, A. S. Cupp, M. E. Wehrman, K. E. Peters, V. Mariscal, T. Sanchez, and J. E. Kinder. 1996. Changing dose of progesterone results in sudden changes in frequency of LH pulses and secretion of 17b-estradiol in bovine females. Biol. Reprod. 54: 546-54. [ Links ]

Berry, D. P., R. F. Veerkamp, and P. Dillon. 2006. Phenotypic profiles for body weight, body condition score, energy intake, and energy balance across different parities and concentrate feeding levels. Livest. Sci. 104: 1-12. [ Links ]

Carter, F., N. Forde, P. Duffy, M. Wade, T. Fair, M. A. Crowe, A. C. Evans, D. A. Kenny, J. F. Roche, and P. Lonergan. 2008. Effect of increasing progesterone concentration from day 3 of pregnancy on subsequent embryo survival and development in beef heifers. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 20: 368-375. [ Links ]

Cerri, R. L. A., H. M. Rutigliano, R. G. S. Bruno, and J. E. P. Santos. 2009. Progesterone concentration, follicular development and induction of cyclicity in dairy cows receiving intravaginal progesterone inserts. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 110: 56-70. [ Links ]

Díaz T., E. J. P. Schmitt, M. J. Thatcher, and W. W. Thatcher. 1998. Human chorionic gonadotropin-induced alterations in ovarian follicular dynamics during estrus cycle of heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 76: 1929-1936. [ Links ]

Diskin, M. G., J. J. Murphy, and J. M. Sreenan. 2006. Embryo survival in dairy cows managed under pastoral conditions. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 96: 297-311. [ Links ]

Flores, J. O., V. C. Roque, O. R. López, S.S. Benítez, A. M. Oropeza, y J. Hernández-Cerón . 2013. Porcentaje de concepción en vacas lecheras tratadas con progesterona en el día 5 después de la inseminación. Rev. Mex. Ciencias Pec. 4: 507-514. [ Links ]

Fourichon, C., H. Seegers, and X. Malher. 2000. Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: a meta-analysis. Theriogenology 53: 1729-1759. [ Links ]

Friedman, E., Z. Roth, H. Voet, Y. Lavon, and D. Wolfenson. 2012. Progesterone supplementation postinsemination improves fertility of cooled dairy cows during the summer. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 3092-3099. [ Links ]

García, F. E. O., M. J. L. Cordero, A. E. Hizarza, O. J. Peralta, C. M. E. Ortega, M. Cárdenas, C. G. Gutiérrez, and T. E. M. Sánchez. 2004. Induction of a new follicular wave in holstein heifers synchronized with norgestomet. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 80: 47-57. [ Links ]

Gröhn, Y. T., and P. J. Rajala-Schultz. 2000. Epidemiology of reproductive performance in dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 60-61: 605-14. [ Links ]

Larson, S. F., W. R. Butler and W. B. Currie. 2007. Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cattle following supplementation of progesterone after artificial insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 102: 172-179. [ Links ]

Leroy, J. L. M. R., G. Opsomer, A. Van Soom, I. G. F. Goovaerts, and P. E. J. Bols. 2008. Reduced fertility in high-yielding Dairy Cows: Are the oocyte and embryo in danger? Part I. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 43: 612-622. [ Links ]

Lima, J. R., F. A. Rivera, C. D. Narciso, R. Oliveira, R. C. Chebel, and J. E. P. Santos. 2009. Effect of increasing amounts of supplemental progesterone in a timed artificial insemination protocol on fertility of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 5436-5446. [ Links ]

López-Gatius, F., P. Santolaria, J. Janiz, J. Ruttlant, and M. Lopez-Bejar M. 2002. Factors affecting pregnancy loss from gestation day 38 to 90 in lactating dairy cows from a single herd. Theriogenology 57: 1251-1261. [ Links ]

López-Gatius, F. , P. I. García-Ispierto, P. Santolaria, J. Yániz, C. Nogareda, and M. López-Bejar. 2006. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 65: 1678-1689. [ Links ]

Macmillan, K. L. and A. J. Peterson. 1993. A new intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for cattle (CIDR-B) for oestrous synchronization, increasing pregnancy rates and the treatment of post-partum anoestrus. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 33: 1-25. [ Links ]

Mann, G. E., and G. E. Lamming. 1999. The influence of Progesterone During Early Pregnancy in Cattle. Reprod. Domesti. Anim. 34: 269-274. [ Links ]

Mann, G. E. , and G. E. Lamming. 2001. Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows. Reproduction 121:175-180. [ Links ]

Mann, G. E., M. D. Fray, and G. E. Lamming. 2006. Effects of time of progesterone supplementation on embryo development and interferon-t production in cow. The Vet. J. 171: 500-503. [ Links ]

Nascimento, A. B., A. H. Souza, J. N. Guenther, F. P. Costa, R. Sartori and M. C. Wiltbank. 2013. Effects of treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin or intravaginal progesterone-releasing device after AI on circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating dairy cows. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 25: 818-24. [ Links ]

National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. National Academic Science, Washington, DC. [ Links ]

Pursley, J. R., M. O. Mee, and M. C. Wiltbank. 1995. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2a and GnRH. Theriogenology , 44: 915-923. [ Links ]

Sangsritavong, S., D.K. Combs, R. Sartori, L. E. Armentano, and M. C. Wiltbank. 2002. High feed intake increase liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and estradiol17b in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85: 2831-2842. [ Links ]

Santos, J. E. P., W. W. Thatcher, L. Pool, and M. W. Overton. 2001. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal function and reproductive performance of high-producing lactating Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 2881-2894. [ Links ]

Starbuck, M. J., R. A. Dailey and K. Inskeep. 2004. Factors affecting retention of early pregnancy in dairy cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 84: 27-39. [ Links ]

Stronge, A. J. H., J. M. Sreenan, M. G. Diskin, J. F. Mee, D. A. Kenny, and D. G. Morris. 2005. Post-insemination milk progesterone concentration and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology 64: 1212-1224. [ Links ]

Tixi C., A. Villa-Godoy, C. García, y J. Hernández-Cerón. 2009a. Intervalo entre servicios y porcentaje de concepción en vacas lecheras en estabulación. Memorias del XXXIII Congreso Nacional de Buiatría. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas. México. pp: 283. [ Links ]

Tixi C. , A. Villa-Godoy, C. García, H. Montaldo, E. Posadas, y J. Hernández-Cerón. 2009b. Factores que afectan el porcentaje de vacas gestantes en el día 90 posparto. Memorias del XXXIII Congreso Nacional de Buiatría. Tuxtla Gutiérrez Chiapas. México. pp: 277. [ Links ]

Urzúa E., C. G. Gutiérrez, A. Garza, C. Corona, G. Mapes, and C. J. Hernández. 2009. Pregnancy success and luteal function of lactating Holstein cows after hCG on day 5 after insemination. J. Dairy Sci. 92 suppl 1:443. [ Links ]

Vasconcelos, J. L., S. Sangsritavong, S. J. Tsai and M. C. Wiltbank. 2003. Acute reduction in serum progesterone concentrations after feed intake in dairy cows. Theriogenology 60: 795-807. [ Links ]

Walsh, S. W., E. J. Williams and A. C. O. Evans. 2011. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci . 123: 127-138. [ Links ]

Received: March 01, 2015; Accepted: January 01, 2016

* Author for correspondence. (jhc@unam.mx)

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons