SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número1Una secuencia cratónica del Carbonífero al Pérmico inferior expuesta en los cerros El Tule, noreste de Sonora, MéxicoBioestratigrafía de conodontes del Darriwiliano medio (Ordovícico) de Argentina: la Formación Las Aguaditas, Precordillera Central índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas

versión impresa ISSN 1026-8774

Rev. mex. cienc. geol vol.29 no.1 México abr. 2012

 

Microbiostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous strata from the Bararig Mountain, SE Iran

 

Microbioestratigrafía de los estratos del Cretácico Inferior de la Montaña Bararig, SE de Irán

 

Mahin Rami1, Mohammad Reza Vaziri2, Morteza Taherpour Khalil Abad3*, Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini4, Ivana Carevic5, and Mohsen Allameh6

 

1 Department of Geology, North–Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Shahid Bahonar Universty, Kerman, Iran.

3 Department of Geology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran. Young Researchers Club, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University.* m_taherpour@mshdiau.ac.ir

4 Exploration Directorate, National Iranian Oil Company, Tehran, Iran.

5 Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 3/3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

6 Department of Geology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

 

Manuscript received: June 14, 2011
Corrected manuscript received: August 26, 2011
Manuscript accepted: September 2, 2011

 

ABSTRACT

The Barremian–Aptian sediments in the Bararig section (Southwest of Kuhbanan) consist of an alternation of marl and limestone. Thepalaeontological analysis led to identification of twenty seven taxa of benthic foraminifera and algae in the section studied. Diverse assemblages of benthic foraminifera and also the lowplanktonic/benthic (P/B) ratio show that the sedimentary environment in the study area was oxygenated and shallow.

Key words: microbiostratigraphy, palaeoecology, Lower Cretaceous, Bararig section, Kerman Province, Iran.

 

RESUMEN

Los sedimentos del Barremiano–Aptiano en la sección Bararig section (al suroeste de Kuhbanan) consisten en una alternancia de margas y calizas. El análisis paleontológico permitió la identificación de 27 taxa de foraminíferos bentónicos y algas en la sección estudidad. Diversas asociaciones de foraminíferos bentónicos y la baja relación de planctónicos/bentónicos (P/B) indica que el ambiente sedimentario en el área de estudio fue oxigenado y somero.

Palabras clave: microbiostratigrafía, paleoecología, Cretácico Inferior, sección Bararig, Provincia Kerman, Irán.

 

INTRODUCTION AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING

Lower Cretaceous sediments in some areas of the Kerman region, Iran, such as Baghin, Ekhtiyar–Abad and Kuhbanan, are marlstones and limestones with intercalations of marl. The first studies in the Kerman region were done by Pilgrim (1924). Huckreide et al. (1962) comprehensively studied the geology of the Kerman region and delineated the Cretaceous palaeogeography of this region. Cretaceous foraminifera of the Kerman region have been studied by Mahanipoor (2003), and Arab (2003, 2004, 2005). Vaziri (2003) studied the distribution of foraminifera and the paleoecology of the Cenomanian deposits. Hosseinipour et al. (2003), Arab et al. (2004, 2005) and Vaziri et al. (2006) studied the Albian–Cenomanian deposits in two stratigraphic sections (Henouj and Chenaroieh) in the western part of the Kerman region, and, eventually, biostratigraphic and paleoecologic studies were done by Ahmadi et al. (2010). Cretaceous outcrops in the Kerman Province are shown in the Figure 1.

This paper presents the results of a palaeoecological study based on the microfossil content of samples collected in the Lower Cretaceous Bararig section, along the Zarand–Kuhbanan–Deh Ali road, Karman province (Figure 2).

Structural units of Iran

units to be recognized in the studied area, separated by ophiolite–bearing sutures. Other criteria such as structural style, the age and intensity of deformation, and the age and nature of magmatism are used to subdivide these major zones into smaller elements. The three major units and their main constituents are as follows: 1) the southern unit, with a crystalline basement consolidated in Precambrian time, platform–type Paleozoic sediments and younger deposits. This unit comprises the Zagros fold belt; 2) the central unit, interpreted as an assemblage of marginal Gondwana fragments, originally united with the main continent and separated from the North (Eurasian) continent during the Paleozoic. In Mesozoic times, these fragments were detached from Gondwana and attached to Eurasia. During the Late Cretaceous they rejoined the Gondwanic Afro–Arabia. This unit comprises Central Iran and the Alborz; 3) the northern unit, markedly separated from the central unit by ophiolites of the North Iran suture. The continental crust includes remnants of more or less cratonized, former (Paleozoic) oceanic crust possibly that of the Paleotethys. The northern unit represents a marginal strip of the Hercynian realm of Central Asia, broadly overlapped by the Alpine realm. It was deformed and largely consolidated by strong Early Cimmerian and Late Alpine folding (Stocklin, 1968). The Northern Unit comprises the South Caspian Depression and the Kopet–Dagh Range (Figure 3).

A brief comparison of Cretaceous deposits in different parts of Iran

The most complete Cretaceous sections in North Iran are found in the Kopet–Dagh range on the border of Iran and Turkmenistan. The rocks consist of marine shales, marls, limestones and sandstones. The sequence reaches a thickness of more than 3000 m and seems to represent all major parts of the Lower Cretaceous strata (Afshar–Harb, 1994). In the Alborz mountains and farther south, Cretaceous limestones and marls are widely distributed but the sections are less complete. Elsewhere, unfossiliferous red clastic basal beds, which in the Ravar–Darband area northern Kerman province, contain considerable amounts of gypsum, frequently initiate the Cretaceous sequence and are followed by limestones and marls of different ages. The oldest marine beds are Orbitolina–bearing limestones (Tiz–Kuh Formation of the Alborz, "Orbitolina limestone" in general), which are conventionally regarded as Aptian–Albian but may include stages as old as Barremian and as young as Cenomanian. An unusual shale facies reaching great thickness and containing very rare cephalopods represents the Barremian–Albian in the Biabanak area of Central Iran (Stocklin and Setudehnia, 1991).

With the exception of the Kopet Dagh area mentioned above, detailed stratigraphic studies of the Upper Cretaceous deposits have been carried out only in a few limited areas such as the central Alborz, Tehran, Jandaq, Esfahan and Kerman areas. Detrital limestones, reef limestones, marls and shales prevail. However, the marine sequences are frequently interrupted by conglomerates, red beds, sedimentary gaps and unconformities and the sections vary in detail over short distances, reflecting the unstable conditions of the sedimentary environment during the initial phases of the Alpine orogeny. This and considerable disagreement between interpretations of different authors regarding the stratigraphic significance of the faunas has so far made reliable correlation over any greater distance difficult and a consistent stratigraphic subdivision of the Upper Cretaceous has yet to be established. The Stratigraphic Terminological Committee (STC) of Iran has recommended not introducing any formal stratigraphic names for the Upper Cretaceous strata of the Alborz and of central and eastern Iran until more regional information becomes available to clarify the situation, in compliance with this recommendation (Stocklin and Setudehnia, 1991).

Stratigraphy of the Bararig section

The Bararig section is situated in the NW–SE striking Bararig mountains, at approximately 60 km southwest of Kuhbanan city (Kerman Province), and is accessible by the Zarand–Kuhbanan–Deh Ali road (Figure 2). The section is 190 m thick and is composed of two lithological associations, marls and limestones, which were deposited alternatively (Figure 4). The section from the lower to the upper part is as follows: green marls (90 m), gray limestones with intercalation of marls (40 m), light green marls (25 m) and gray, thick–bedded limestones (35 m). The mentioned units contain ostracods, benthic foraminifera and macrofossils. In order to conduct palaeontological studies, samples from marls and limestones were collected. Due to lack offoraminifera in the marly layers, thin–sections of limestoneshave been made. The stratigraphic column and the rangechart of benthic foraminifers are shown in Figure 5.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This paper is based on the study of the Bararig section along the Zarand–Kuhbanan–Deh Ali road. The Barremian–Aptian succession was measured and sampled. Microfossil content of the samples was studied in 37 thin sections with an optical microscope. These allowed the identification of the vertical foraminiferal distribution and establishment of two regional biozones. The palaeoecological study deter–mined three benthic foraminiferal groups. All rock samples and thin sections are housed in the Department of Geology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.

The taxonomic determination of the foraminifers is based on the latest changes in the foraminiferal classifications: Loeblich and Tappan (1988, 1992) and Kaminski (2004), and takes into account the following works: Jones and Charnock (1985), Koutsoukos et al. (1990), Baud et al. (1994), Cherchi and Schroeder (1999), Yilmaz (1999), Granier et al. (2003), Masse et al. (2004, 2009).

 

SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY

Cylindroporella sp. cf. Cylindroporella sugdeni Elliott, 1957
Figure 6–1

Description. Oblique–transversal section shows a cylindrical thallus, with primary branches connecting to the main axis with a short peduncle. The inner diameter is about 0.17 mm; whereas it shows an outer diameter of approximately 0.55 mm. Primary laterals are followed by large spherical gamete production. The secondary branches arise from the sterile primary branches. It presents a calcified sheath composed of calcite covering the strikethrough.

Total range. Hauterivian – Aptian.

Occurrence. S45, S47 (see sample position in Figure 5).

Stratigraphic distribution. Hauterivian–Aptian of Switzerland, Portugal, France, and Aptian of Iran.

Nautiloculina oolithica Mohler, 1938
Figure 6–4

Description. Longitudinal section shows a lenticular shape and planispiral coil, which is involute. Proloculus is globular and followed by three small chambers. Chambers increase gradually in size. Wall agglutinated, microgranular and single layered.

Total range. Oxfordian–Aptian.

Occurrence. S46, S47, S57, S59.

Stratigraphic distribution. Aptian of Iran and Late Oxfordian–Berriasian of Ukraine.

Marssonella turris d'Orbigny, 1840
Figure 6–5

Description. Subaxial section shows biserial stage of a trochospiral. Diameter of chambers increases rapidly and the terminal chamber becomes flattened. Wall agglutinated with organic lining in calcareous particles.

Total range. Early to Late Cretaceous.

Occurrence. S31, S37, S39, S41, S49, S53, S56, S57, S59.

Stratigraphic distribution. Cosmopolitan in the Early to Late Cretaceous. Aptian of Iran.

Novalesia angulosa Magniez, 1974
Figure 6–6

Description. Axial section represents biserial stage of coiling with seven rows of chambers. Radial beams are not clear, wall agglutinated with relict of interio–marginal slit aperture.

Total range. Late Aptian to Albian.

Occurrence. S31, S37, S39, S41, S44, S55, S56, S57, S59, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Late Aptian–early Albian of Spain and France. Albian of Croatia. Aptian of Iran.

Charentia cuvillieri Neumann, 1965
Figure 6–7

Description. Transversal section shows planispirally enrolled test with biumbonate to lenticular shape. The last chambers have tendency to uncoil. Laterally compressed and periphery nearly rounded. Wall finely agglutinated.

Total range. Hauterivian–Cenomanian.

Occurrence. S39, S41, S43, S44, S46, S47, S49, S51, S53, S55, S57, S59, S70, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Upper Barremian–Cenomanian of France, Spain, Crimea, Texas and Egypt. Aptian of Iran.

Pseudolituonella recheli Marie, 1955
Figure 6–8

Description. Test conical elongate. Early portion with a short trochospiral stage in the type species but more elongate in geologically younger species, later stage with broad and low uniserial chambers. The wall is calcareous, microgranular, imperforate and single layered.

Range. In this study, the late Aptian is considered as the age of this taxon in the studied section.

Occurrence. S31, S37, S39, S46, S49, S51, S55, S57, S59, S70, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Cenomanian–Campanian of France, Spain, Turkey. Aptian of Iran. Lutetian of Libya.

Vercorsella sp. cf. Vercorsella scarsellai De Castro, 1963
Figure 6–9

Description. Axial section reveals a small, elongate and conical test. Apical angle about 20°. Initial trochospiral stage consists of a rounded protoconch, a small deuteroconch, and one chamber, followed by a biserial stage with up to eight chambers, slightly compressed parallel to the plane.

Total range. Barremian to Albian.

Occurrence. S31, S35, S37, S39, S41, S43, S46, S47, S49, S51, S53, S55, S56, S57, S59, S70, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Early Hauterivian–Bedoulian of France and Italy. Aptian of Iran.

Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) cf. Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) texana Roemer, 1849
Figure 6–10

Description. The embryonic apparatus of macrospheric forms, which is very important for an exact determination, is preserved as well and is composed of protoconch, deuteroconch, and sub embryonic zone. It is located on the top of the specimen. The thickness of protoconch is about 0.11 mm and embryonic apparatus is about 0.25 mm.

Total range. Late Aptian–Early Albian.

Occurrence. S31, S33, S35, S37, S39, S40, S41, S43, S44, S46, S47, S49, S51, S53, S55, S56, S57, S59, S70, S70, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Albian–Early Cenomanian of USA, Italy, Spain, China, Tibet and Indian. Aptian of Iran.

cf. Mayncina bulgarica Laug, Peybernès and Rey, 1980
Figure 7–1

Description. Equatorial section shows numerous chambers, about ten chambers per whorl, in a planispiral coiling. Chambers arrangement reveals height increase and a tendency to uncoil of the last two or three chambers. The wall is finely agglutinated.

Total range. Late Hauterivian–Aptian.

Occurrence. S37, S39, S70.

Stratigraphic distribution. Cenomanian of France. Aptian of Iran. Tithonian–Barremian of Ukraine.

Pseudocyclammina cf. Pseudocyclammina lituus Yokoyama, 1890
Figure 7–2

Description. Sub–equatorial section shows planispirally enrolled, the early stage may be streptospiral and represtrata from the Bararig Mountain SE Iran 69 sents uncoiling later. Wall coarsely agglutinated with sub epidermal network.

Total range. Oxfordian–Aptian.

Occurrence. S31, S33, S35, S37, S41, S43, S46, S47, S49, S51, S53, S55, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Early Jurassic–Late Cretaceous of Morroco, Libya, France, Italy, Poland, Mexico and Ukraine. Aptian of Iran.

Rumanoloculina pseudominima Bartenstein and Kovatcheva, 1982
Figure 7–3

Description. Transversal sections show the typical "Y" and somewhat loose mode of chamber arrangement and subacute periphery of the test.

Total range. Berriasian–Albian.

Occurrence. S31, S33, S37, S39, S40, S41, S44, S46, S49, S51, S53, S55, S57, S59, S70, S72, S73, S74.

Stratigraphic distribution. Late Cretaceous of Poland. Berriasian and Aptian of Iran.

Derventina filipescui Neagu, 1968
Figure 7–5

Description. Axial section shows quinqueloculine arrangement in the early stage, becomes later planispriral. Wall calcareous imperforate.

Total range. Late Barremian–Early Aptian.

Occurrence. S41, S42, S43, S44, S45.

Stratigraphic distribution. Barremian of Romania. Aptian of Iran.

Istriloculina sp. cf. Istriloculina alimanensis Neagu, 1984
Figure 7–6

Description. The sample shows globular shape, with different coiling, quinqueloculine in the early stage, then triloculine to pseudotriloculine. Wall calcareous imperforate.

Total range. Late Barremian–Early Aptian.

Occurrence. S33, S57, S59.

Stratigraphic distribution. Late Barremian–Early Aptian of Iran and Poland.

Montseciella arabica Henson, 1948
Figure 7–11

Description. Sub–axial section shows horizontal subepidermal plates in the marginal zone. The central zone exhibits thin, vermicular partitions forming a labyrinthic structure and bordering relatively spacious hollows.

Total range. Barremian–Aptian

Occurrence. S40, S53, S59.

Stratigraphic distribution. Barremian–Aptian of Romania and Iran.

 

IDENTIFIED BIOZONES IN THE BARARIG STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION

According to the studies of thin–sections and identified taxa, two regional biozones are determined and described as follow:

Montseciella arabica Range Zone

Biostratigraphic interval represented by the total range of Montseciella arabica. This biozone is located in the middle part of the section and suggests a Barremian–Aptian age.

Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) texana–Nezzazatinella picardi Assemblage Zone

This assemblage zone contains Praechrysalidina sp., Marssonella turris, Minouxia sp., Novalesia angulosa, Rumanoloculinapseudominima, Haplophragmmoides sp., Vercorsella cf. Vercorsella scarsellai, cf. Mayncina bulgarica, and Charentia cuvillieri. The mentioned biozone is defined by the first appearance of Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) texana taxon and the overthrow of Nezzazatinella picardi taxon; it is found in the lower – upper limestones of the studied section and shows the Aptian age for these deposits.

 

PALAEOECOLOGY

The most abundant foraminifera in the studied section are orbitolinids represented by Pseudotextulariella, Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina), Pseudolituonella, miliolids and Pseudocyclammina. Paleoecological studies show that, there are three groups ofbenthic foraminifera associations in the Bararig section, whereas pelagic foraminifera are missing: 1) Epifaunal genera: Charentia, Rzehakina, Lenticulina, Glomospira, Nezzazata Glomospirella, Nezzazatinella, Nutiloculina, Happlophragmoides, Trochamminoides, Rumanoloculina, Istriloculina, Ophthalmidium, Pseudocyclammina. 2) semi–nfaunal genera: Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) and Orbitolina. 3) Infaunal genus: Pseudolituonella, Pseudotextulariella, Praechrysalidina, Minouxia, Marssonella, Bolivinopsis, Novalesia (Vaziri, 2003).

Epifaunal/infaunal ratio of benthic foraminifera is shown in the Figure 8. According to the thin–sections, epifaunal and semi–infaunal foraminifera make 94.58% of the total percentage of foraminifers in the Berarig section and only 5.42% of foraminifers in this section belong to infaunal forms. It is clear that epifaunal foraminifers are unstable in environments with low amount of oxygen but the infaunal foraminifers are stable in such conditions (Lamolda, 1982; Hart, 1985) therefore, the abundance of epifaunal foraminifers indicates an environment rich in oxygen. Meanwhile, the association of larger benthic foraminifera (such as orbitolinids) with algae shows that the environment is shallow and situated within the photic zone. The available palaeoecological data on miliolids indicates a preference for warm, shallow–water and tolerance between 18 to 36% fluctuations in salinity.

Foraminiferal morphogroups and P/B ratio in the Bararig stratigraphic section

Each microhabitat category has distinct morphological characteristics. Epifaunal taxa are typical with plano–convex or bi–convex cross sections, with trochospiral coiling and with large pores absent or found on only one side. Shallow infaunal taxa are uniserially, triserially, or even planispirally coiled with surface ornamentation present on a number of taxa. The intermediate infaunal taxa are distinguishable with rounded peripheries, with pores over the entire test and with planispiral coiling. The deep infaunal taxa are typical, with general, planispiral or triserial coiling of cylindrical or ovate shaped tests (Corliss, 1991). Although several fluctuations occurred in the generally low planktonic/benthic (P/B) ratio found in the lower limestones, benthic forms are dominating and in 47/06 represent 100% of the whole assemblage. In the upper limestones the rate of oscillation decreased (77/14 to 100%) (see Figures 9 and 10).

 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Barremian–Aptian sediments of the Bararig mountain have all the characteristics of shallow–water deposits. The Urgonian succession consists of two depositional sequences characterized by marls and limestones. According to the foraminiferal assemblages found in the Bararig stratigraphic section and their comparison with stratigraphical sections in other parts of the world (specifically Europe) (Luperto–Sinni and Masse, 1986; Mancinelli et al., 2003; Luperto–Sinni, 1979), a Barremian–Aptian age is suggested for this stratigraphic section.

Also, according to the studies of thin–sections and identified taxa two regional biozones are described: 1) Montseciella arabica Range Zone, and 2) Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) texana–Nezzazatinella picardi Assemblage Zone. The abundance of larger foraminifera indicates good oxygenation of the environment (Kaiho and Hasegawa, 1994). Furthermore, because of the high amount of benthic foraminifera and the low P/B (planktonic/benthic) ratio in the studied section, a low water depth for the environment also is suggested. This is confirmed by the presence of epifaunal and infaunal foraminifers, which are found together in shallow environments (Corliss and Chen, 1988) and also by the presence of algae, also living in shallow, high light, and well aerated environments (Flugel, 1982).

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Mohammad Javad Hasani, Ahmad Arab, Hamed Ameri, Maryam Taheri, Shohreh Jaber and Maryam Derisi for their contributions in field sampling. Helpful comments by the reviewers, Prof. Dr. Seyed Hamid Vaziri (Department of Geology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University–North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran) and Prof. Dr. Josef Michalik (SAS Geological Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia) are acknowledged. Review of the English by Hasmik Asmaryan (Ecocenter NAS RA) is gratefully acknowledged.

 

REFERENCES

Ahmadi, T., 2003, Biostatigraphy and Palaeoecology of Lower Cretaceous sediments in the North of Kerman (Ravar): Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, M.Sc. thesis, 215 pp.         [ Links ]

Ahmadi, T., Vaziri, M.R., Dastanpour, M., 2010, Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of the Lower Cretaceous deposits in the Ravar region, North of Kerman: Stratigraphy and Sedimentology Investigations, University of Esfahan. 25(2), 87–116.         [ Links ]

Afshar–Harb, A., 1994, Geology of Kopet–Dagh (in Persian): Tehran, Geological Survey of Iran, 275 pp.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., 2003, Stratigraphy, Palaeontology and Palaeoecology of Upper Cretaceous sediments in the West of Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, M.Sc. thesis, 248 pp.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., 2004, Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of the Upper Cretaceous in Cheshmeh gaz stratigraphic section, West of Kerman, in Ashouri A. R., Yazdi M., Aryaei A. A. (eds),. Proceeding of the 8th Symposium of Geological Society of Iran: 230–237.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., 2005, Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous deposits, West of Kerman, in Yazdi M., Hamdi B. A., Ashouri A. R. (eds),. Proceeding of the 25th Convention of Geosciences, Iran, 126–129.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., Vaziri, M.R., 2005, Ostracoda and ecological environment in the Upper Albian–Lower Cenomanian in the Chenaroieh section (West of Kerman), in Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Iranian Paleontological Society, Kerman, Iran.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., Hakimeh Pour, M.A., Kheradmand, A., Faryabi, A., 2004, Biostratigraphy and Palaeoecology of Upper Cretaceous sediment in the Hanoj section (West of Kerman), in Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Iranian Paleontological Society, Kerman, Iran.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., Vaziri, M.R., Dastanpour, M., 2005, The first report on the Upper Albian–Lower Cenomanian Ostracods in Chenarooyeh stratigraphic section, West of Kerman, in Ashouri, A.R., Ghavidel Syooki, M. (eds),. Proceeding of the 9th Symposium of the Geological Society of Iran, 213–218.         [ Links ]

Arab, A., Vaziri, M.R., Dastanpour, M., Kheradmand, A., 2006, Biostratigraphy of the Late Albian–Cenomanian foraminifera in Chenarooyeh stratigraphic section, West of Kerman, in Amiri Bakhtiar, H., Shemirani, A., Sadeghi, A. (eds),. Proceeding of the 10th Symposium of the Geological Society of Iran, 105–108.         [ Links ]

Bakhtiari, S., 2007, Road Atlas of Iran: Tehran, Gitashenasi Geographical and Cartographic Institute.         [ Links ]

Bartenstein, H., Kovatcheva, T., 1982, A comparison of Aptian Foraminifera in Bulgaria and North West Germany: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 75(3), 621–667.         [ Links ]

Baud, A., Cherchi, A. and Schroeder, R., 1994, Dictyoconus arabicus Henson (Foraminiferida) from the late Barremian of the Lhasa block (Central Tibet): Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 100(3), 383–394.         [ Links ]

Berberian, M., King, G.G.P., 1981, Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18, 210–265.         [ Links ]

Cherchi, A., Schroeder, R., 1999, Montseciella, a new orbitolinid genus (Foraminiferida) from the Uppermost Hauterivian–Early Barremian of SW Europe: Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona, 8, 5–23.         [ Links ]

Corliss, B.H., 1991, Morphology and microhabitat preferences of benthic foraminifera from the northwest Atlantic Ocean: Marine Micropaleontology, 17, 195–236.         [ Links ]

Corliss, B.H., Chen, Ch., 1988, Morphotype patterns of Norwegian Sea deep–sea benthic foraminifera and ecological implications: Geology, 16, 716–719.         [ Links ]

d'Orbigny, A., 1840, Mémoires sur les foraminifères de la craie blanche du bassin de Paris: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, 4, 1–51.         [ Links ]

De Castro, P., 1963, Cuneolina scarsellai n. sp. nel Cretacico dell'Appennino Meridionale: Bollettino della Societ & dei Naturalisti in Napoli: 72, 71–76.         [ Links ]

Elliott, G.F., 1957, New calcareous algae from the Arabian peninsula: Micropaleontology, 3, 227–230.         [ Links ]

Henson, F., 1948, Larger imperforate Foraminifera of south–west Asia. Families Lituolidae, Orbitolinidae, and Meandropsinidae: British Museum (Natural History), London, 127 pp.         [ Links ]

Laug, B., Peybernes, B., Rey, J., 1980, Mayncina bulgarica n.sp. Lituolidé nouveau du Crétacé inférieur Mésogéen (Bulgarie, Portugal, Pyrénées, Tunisie): Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 116, 68–76.         [ Links ]

Luperto–Sinni, E., 1979, I microfossili del livello a "Palorbitolina lenticularis" delle murge baresi: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 85 (2), 1–70.         [ Links ]

Luperto–Sinni, E., Masse, J.P., 1986, Données nouvelles sur la stratigraphie des Calcaires de plate–forme du Crétacé inférieur du Gargano (Italie meridionale): Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 92 (1), 33–66.         [ Links ]

Neagu, T., 1968, Andersenia rumana, n. gen., n. sp., and some taxonomic observations on the subfamily Valvulininae: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 19, 120–122.         [ Links ]

Neagu, T., 1984, Nouvelles donnees sur la morphologie du test, sur la systematique et la nomenclature des miliolides agatisthegues du mesozoique, 16, 75–90.         [ Links ]

Flugel, E., 1982, Microfacies Analysis of Limestone: Berlin, Springer, 633 pp.         [ Links ]

Granier, B., Al Suwaidi, A. S., Busnardo, R., Aziz, S.K., Schroeder, R., 2003, New insight on the stratigraphy of the ''Upper Thamama" in Offshore Abu Dhabi (U.A.E.): Carnets de Geologie/Notebooks on Geology, 17, Maintenon, Article 2003/05, (CG2003_A05_BG_etal).         [ Links ]

Hart, M.B., 1985, Oceanic anoxic event 2 on–shore and off–shore SW England: Proceeding of the Ussher Society, 6, 183–190.         [ Links ]

Henson, F.R.S., 1948, Larger imperforate foraminifera of South–Western Asia, Families Lituolidae, Orbitolinidae and Meandropsinidae: British Museum (Natural History), 1–127.         [ Links ]

Hosseinipour, F., Vaziri, M. R., Dastanpour, M., Arab, A., 2003, Oligo–Miocene Ostracods in Boojan stratigraphic section and the related paleoecology, in Aryaei A.A., Ghavidel Syooki M., Vaziri Moghadam ,S.H (eds), Proceeding of the 10th Symposium of the Geological Society of Iran, 115–120.         [ Links ]

Huckreide, R., Kursten, M., Venzlaff, I., 1962, Zur Geologie des Gebietes Zwischen Kerman un Sagand (Iran): Hannover Bundesanstalt für Bodenforschung, 197 pp.         [ Links ]

Jones, R.W., Charnock, M.A., 1985, Morphogroups of agglutinating Foraminifera, their life positions and feeding habits and potential applicanility in (Paleo) ecological studies: Revue de Paléobiologie, 4, 311– 320.         [ Links ]

Kaiho, K., Hasegawa T., 1994, End Cenomanian benthic foraminiferal extinctions and oceanic dysoxic events in the northwestwern Pacific Ocean: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 111, 29–43.         [ Links ]

Kaminski, M.A., 2004, The Year 2000 Classification of the Agglutinated Foraminifera, in Bubík M., Kaminski M.A. (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera, Grzybowski Foundation, Special Publication, 237–255.         [ Links ]

Koutsoukos, E.A.M., Leary, P.N., Hart, M.B., 1990b, Latest Cenomanian–Earliest Turonian low–oxygen tolerant benthonic foraminifera: a case study from the Sergipe Basin (NE Brazil) and the western Anglo–Paris Basin (southern England): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 77, 145–177.         [ Links ]

Lamolda, M.A., 1982, Le Turonian Basco–Cantabrique et ses faunes caractéristiques: Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, C49, 101–112.         [ Links ]

Leoblich, A.R., Tapan, H., 1988, Foraminiferal genera and their classification: New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.         [ Links ]

Loeblich, A.R., Tappan, H., 1992, Present status of foraminiferal classification, in Takayanagi, Y., Saito, T. (eds.), Studies in Benthic Foraminifera, Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on benthic foraminifera, Sendai, 1990: Tokyo, Tokai University Press, 93–102.         [ Links ]

Mahanipoor, A., 2003, Biostatigraphy and Palaeoecology of Upper Cretaceous sediment in the North and North West of Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, M.Sc. thesis, 196 pp.         [ Links ]

Magniez, F., 1974, Novalesia, nouveau nom pour le genre de foraminifere Spiroplectamminoides Magniz, 1972: Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 6, 155.         [ Links ]

Mancinelli, A., Chiocchini, M., Coccia, B., 2003, Orbitolinidae and Alveolinidae (Foraminiferida) from the uppermost Albian–Lower Cenomanian of Monti d' Ocre (Abruzzi, Italy): Cretaceous Research, 24, 729–741.         [ Links ]

Marie, P., 1955, Quelques genres nouveaux de foraminifères du Crétacé à facies récifal, in Comptes Rendus de la dix–neuvième session, Congrès Gèologique International, Alger 1952, Section 13(15), 117–124.         [ Links ]

Masse, J.P., Õzer, S., Fenerci, M., 2004, Upper Barremian–Lower Aptian rudist faunas from the western Black Sea region (Turkey): Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 247, 75–88.         [ Links ]

Masse, J.P., Tüysüz, O., Fenerci–Masse, M., Õzer, S., Sari, B., 2009, Stratigraphic organisation, spatial distribution, palaeoenvironmental reconstruction, and demise of Lower Cretaceous (Barremian–lower Aptian) carbonate platforms of the Western Pontides (Black Sea region, Turkey): Cretaceous Research, 30, 1170–1180.         [ Links ]

Neumann, M., 1965, Contribution a l'etude de quelques Lituolides du Cenomanien de l'lle Madame (Charente–Maritime): Revue de Micropaleontologie, 8, 90–95.         [ Links ]

Pilgrim, G.E., 1924, The Geology of parts of the Persian Provinces of Fars, Kerman and Luristan: Geological Survey of India, Memoir, 48, 2, 1–118.         [ Links ]

Roemer, F., 1849, Texas, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf deutsche Auswanderung und die physischen Verhältnisse des Landes nach eigener Beobachtungen geschildert: Bonn, A. Marcus, 464 pp.         [ Links ]

Stocklin, J., 1968, Structural history and tectonics of Iran, a review: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 52, 1229–1258.         [ Links ]

Stocklin J., Setudehnia A., 1991, Stratigraphic Lexicon of Iran, Report No. 18: Tehran, Iran, Geological Survey of Iran, 376 pp.         [ Links ]

Taherpour Khalil Abad, M., Aryaei, A.A., Ashouri, A.R., Ghaderi, A., 2011, Introducing some echinoderms from the Tirgan Formation, Kopeh–Dagh Basin, NE of Iran: Geopersia, University of Tehran, 1(1), 83–94.         [ Links ]

Vaziri, M.R., 2003, Dominated foraminifera and their paleological properties in Cenomanian deposits of Kerman: Esfahan University Press, 18(2), 1–18.         [ Links ]

Vaziri, M. R., Dastanpour, M., Mahanipour, A. , Arab, A., 2006, Macrofossil assemblages of the Middle Cretaceous in the West of Kerman region: Journal of Sciences, University of Tehran, 32(2), 105–113.         [ Links ]

Yilmaz, I.Ö., 1999, Taxonomic and Paelogeographic Approaches to the Dasyclad Algae in the Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)–Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Peritidal Carbonates of the Fele (YassYbel) Area (Western Taurides, Turkey): Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 8 (2–3), 81–101.         [ Links ]

Yokoyamo, M., 1890, Foraminiferen aus dem Kalksteine von Torinosu und Kompira: Wien, Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch–Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 57, 26–27.         [ Links ]