SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39Impacto de las medidas de contención de la pandemia de COVID-19 en las concentraciones de partículas PM10 y PM2.5 en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de MéxicoIdentification of halophilic bacteria tolerant to heavy metals índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista internacional de contaminación ambiental

versión impresa ISSN 0188-4999

Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient vol.39  Ciudad de México  2023  Epub 14-Sep-2023

https://doi.org/10.20937/rica.54664 

Articles

First approach to microplastics occurrence in sandy beaches in the province of Islay (Arequipa), southern Peru

Primera aproximación a la presencia de microplásticos en playas arenosas de la provincia de Islay (Arequipa), sur del Perú

César Raúl Luque-Fernández1  * 

Ibai Alcelay1 

Luis Villegas Paredes1 

Edwin Bocardo-Delgado1 

1 Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Av. Daniel Alcides Carrión s/n, Cercado, 04001, Arequipa, Perú.


ABSTRACT

Plastic pollution in marine and coastal environments has been widely recognized as a growing environmental concern. Plastic particles generated mainly by the degradation of larger plastic debris have been called microplastics (< 5 mm), which are being widely studied in all regions of the world. In South America there has been a constant increase of the research on this topic mainly on the Pacific coast. Specifically, in Peru, the number of publications has also increased, but the northern and southern zones are not well studied. Due to the importance of determining the presence of these contaminants, especially in coastal regions, which are considered as repository environments for these plastics, it is necessary to establish baselines of their current situation. This research aimed to determine and characterize the presence of microplastic particles (< 5 mm) on five sandy beaches in the province of Islay in southern Peru and to consider the possible effect of the Tambo River mouth on the transport and deposition of microplastics on two adjacent beaches. Three sampling stations were determined for each selected beach, consisting of three to two quadrants (1 m2) sampled at 5 cm depth. The results confirm the presence of microplastics. A total of 304 particles were found, with an average density between 1 to 4 part/m2. The areas with the highest concentration of microplastic particles and frequency of occurrence were the beaches adjacent to the river estuary where the most frequent types of particles were fragments and fibers, followed by foams and films, but no pellets.

Key words: plastics; marine debris; pollution; estuary

RESUMEN

La contaminación por plásticos en ambientes marinos y costeros ha sido ampliamente reconocida como una problemática ambiental que sigue en crecimiento. Las partículas de plásticos generadas principalmente por la degradación de restos plásticos de mayor tamaño han sido denominadas microplásticos (< 5 mm), los cuales están siendo ampliamente estudiados en todas las regiones del mundo. En Sudamérica ha habido un incremento constante de estas investigaciones, sobre todo en la costa del Pacífico, y en el caso de Perú también se ha visto incrementando, sin embargo, las zonas norte y sur no se encuentran bien representadas. Debido a la importancia de determinar la presencia de estos contaminantes, sobre todo en regiones costeras, las cuales se reportan como ambientes repositorios de estos plásticos, es que se hace necesario plantear líneas base de su situación actual. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar y caracterizar la presencia de partículas microplásticas (< 5 mm) en cinco playas arenosas de la provincia de Islay en el sur del Perú, y además considerar el posible efecto de la desembocadura del río Tambo en dos playas adyacentes. Se establecieron tres estaciones de muestreo para cada playa seleccionada, cada estación consistía en la aplicación de cuadrantes de 1 m2 y muestreos a una profundidad de 5 cm. Los resultados confirman la presencia de microplásticos en estas playas con 304 partículas encontradas, con una densidad promedio entre 1 a 4 part/m2, donde las zonas con mayor concentración de partículas de microplásticos y frecuencia de ocurrencia fueron las playas adyacentes a la desembocadura del río. Dentro de los tipos de partículas más frecuentes se encontraron fragmentos y fibras, en menor proporción, espumas y films, no se reportaron pellets en estas playas.

Palabras clave: plásticos; residuos marinos; contaminación; estuario

INTRODUCTION

Plastic manufacturing started around 1930, achieving a significant increase in its production rate from around 1.5 to 368 million tons by 2019 (PE 2020), which is a consequence of its high demand due to its multiple properties and advantages (Masiá et al. 2019). It has been estimated that a high percentage (~ 4%) of this plastic production ends up in the oceans where, transported by the ocean currents, some is then deposited on shorelines around the world (Martinez et al. 2009, Andrady 2011, UNEP 2021). Therefore, along with its production, the accumulation rate of plastics in the oceans is also increasing every year (Jambeck et al. 2015) which, added to its low degradation rate, allows it to remain in these environments for many years becoming a serious environmental problem. During this slow degradation process, smaller particles known as microplastics are produced principally by UV radiation and mechanical action (Rojo-Nieto and Montoto 2017).

These microplastics include all those plastic particles smaller than 5 mm in size (Crawford and Quinn 2017), which can be found in a wide variety of habitats around the world, even inside the human body (Leslie et al. 2022). It is estimated that currently around 4.8 to 12.7 million tons of microplastics are discharged into the oceans every year, and this quantity is increasing over time (Jambeck et al. 2015), expected to reach around 13% of the total plastics production by 2040 (UNEP 2021). Among its environmental problems, microplastics represent a potential risk for living organisms affecting planktonic organisms, invertebrates, and vertebrates, mainly birds, mammals, and fish (Wright et al. 2013, Clark et al. 2016, Yu et al. 2018). The above is because they can be distributed throughout the trophic webs at different levels of the food chain, including human beings (Nadeeka et al. 2017, Rist et al. 2018, Cho et al. 2019). Recent studies have shown that microplastics are accumulating on beaches worldwide (Andrady 2011, Browne et al. 2011, Isobe et al. 2015, Nel and Froneman 2015, Kunz et al. 2016, Wessel et al. 2016, Peng et al. 2020, Urban-Malinga et al. 2020), including Arctic areas (Erikson et al. 2013, Fang et al. 2018). In South America, some research on microplastics have been developed during the last few years (Kutralam-Muniasamy et al. 2020), where the main scope was ecological, covering identification, spatial and temporal distribution, as well as the sources of the microplastics and consequences of their presence (Ivar do Sul and Costa 2007, Rezania et al. 2018, Kutralam-Muniasamy et al. 2020). In Peru, few investigations have been carried out, especially in beach environments, and most of them are related to ingestion by animals and freshwater environments (Purca and Henostroza 2017, Iannacone et al. 2019, de la Torre et al. 2020, Perez-Venegas et al. 2020, Valencia-Velasco et al. 2020, de la Torre et al. 2021).

Therefore, it is essential to complement this information to provide a research baseline on the types of microplastics present on the sandy beaches and their accumulation in different types of ecosystems, especially within the local and national reality, establishing possible causes of their presence, effects, and actions to be implemented for their reduction. For that reason, this study aimed to evaluate the presence and type (morphology) of microplastics present on the sandy beaches (Mollendo, Motobomba, Santuario, Catas, and Punta de Bombon) of Islay province, located in the department of Arequipa, southern Peru. It also included the evaluation of the effect of the Tambo River estuary dynamic in the surrounding beaches on the abundance of microplastics, as this area is vital for migratory birds to feed and rest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

The study was conducted during October and November 2018 on five sandy beaches of the coastal area of Islay, department of Arequipa, in southern Peru, one of the main coastal areas in the south of this country. Currently, the population around these beaches is estimated at 52 000 inhabitants (INEI 2018), whereas, during the summer, more than 150 000 visitors can reach. The study covered the beaches located in the districts of Mollendo, Mejía, Dean Valdivia, and Punta de Bombón (Fig. 1). The selected beaches were Mollendo (17º2’15.41” S / 72º0’7.84” W), Motobomba (17º7’0.75” S / 71º53’56.41” W), Punta de Bombón (17º11’38.62” S / 71º46’43.38” W), Santuario (17º9’56.03 “S/ 71º50’53.77” W) and Catas (17º10’34.16” S / 71º49’49.99” W). The last two beaches were analyzed separately to determine if the Tambo River estuary influenced the presence of microplastics.

Fig. 1 Location of sandy beaches evaluated in the province of Islay, Arequipa, southern Peru. 

Sampling design on sandy beaches

Three sampling stations were selected on each beach for Mollendo, Motobomba and Punta de Bombón beaches following the methodology described by Losh (2015). In each station three transects (distance of 50 m between transects) perpendicular to the coastline were established. In each transect, three quadrants made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) of 1 m2 were deployed making a total of nine quadrants per sampling station (Fig. 2a), therefore 27 quadrants per beach. A sample of sand was collected up to a depth of 5 cm per each quadrant. In order to keep independent evaluated areas within each beach, every station was 1 km away from each other.

Fig. 2 Methodology used at each sampling station, showing the quadrant installation layout in the area to be evaluated (adapted and modified from Losh 2015) for sandy beaches in the province of Islay, Islay province. Arequipa (a) for independent beaches (Mollendo, Motobomba, Punta de Bombón) and (b) beaches influenced by the Tambo River estuary (Santuario and Catas). 

In the case of Santuario and Catas beaches, which could be affected by Tambo River discharge, the methodology was modified to include six stations, three for each side of the river’s mouth and separated 1 km away. The letters “A,” “B,” and “C” were used to identify the stations: stations “A” were the closest one to the river mouth, and stations “C” were the farthest one from the river mouth. Only six quadrants per sampling station were deployed due to the narrowness of the evaluated area (Fig. 2b) caused by vegetation in the upper zone (Verlander and Mocogni 1999). The delimitation of the stations covered the area from the high tide line towards the upper part, known as the dry zone, avoiding areas of abnormal concentrations of multigenerational tidal accumulation lines (de Carvalho and Baptista-Neto 2016).

Sample processing and statistical analysis

Each sample was first sieved through a 5 mm mesh sieve and then through a 1 mm mesh sieve (de Carvalho and Baptista-Neto 2016). The material remaining from the 1 mm sieve was stored, avoiding any pressure that could fragment the collected particles, and labeled for further processing in the laboratory. The samples obtained were separated individually by beach, site and sampling quadrant. Then they were classified and counted with a stereomicroscope following the methodology recommended in the literature (Andrady 2011, Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012). Other separation methods were not applied since the microplastics could be fragmented increasing the number of particles that could cause an overestimation in the final count. In some cases, a hot needle was used to make sure that the particle was in fact plastic. The microplastics were classified into five types, following the general classification proposed in Crawford and Quinn (2017), such as pellets, fragments, fibers, films, and foams. The obtained data were used to estimate the total amount, frequency, and density of microplastics on the beaches. The Mood’s median test was used to evaluate the statistical difference in the number of microplastics found between the beaches, where the normality of the data was verified previously by the Shapiro-Wilk test. All statistical analyses were conducted using RStudio (RST 2020).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Abundance and frequency of microplastics on independent beaches

One hundred forty-seven microplastic particles (MP) were found on the beaches that were assessed as independent (Mollendo, Motobomba, Punta de Bombón). Results showed significant differences (Chi-square: χ2= 24.7, df= 2, P < 0.01). Motobomba Beach had the highest number of MP (108 pieces, X̅ = 4.0 part/m2), as well as a higher frequency of occurrence of MP (20 out of 27 samples). On the other hand, Mollendo Beach and Punta de Bombon showed a low frequency of particle occurrence (Fig. 3a). For these two beaches, the range of MP was from 0 to 21 part/m2 and a mean value of 1.81 part/m2, showing relatively low pollution values. These results are similar to those evaluated by Purca and Henostroza (2017) in the sandy beaches of central Peru (Albufera de Medio Mundo, Vesique, Costa Azul, and El Chaco), which present pretty higher values of MP per square meter (range 4 - 463 part/m2), especially the “Costa Azul” (Lima). Other beaches evaluated in Lima (de la Torre et al. 2020, Petrel et al. 2020) showed higher values of microplastics found in the central (16.6 - 489 part/m2) and southern beaches of Lima (136 - 394 part/m2). Regarding the type of MP found on these beaches, the presence of fragments, film, fibers, and foams was observed. However, no pellets in either of the three beaches, which is remarkable since in many studies conducted on coastal sandy areas, pellets were the dominant type of MP (Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012, de Carvalho and Baptista 2016, Kunz et al. 2016, Abayomi et al. 2017, de la Torre et al. 2020). The results of the present study could be explained by the absence of industries producing plastic products in Arequipa or Moquegua, which could discharge pellets to the Tambo River basin. However, the presence of these MP is confirmed for sandy beaches in Lima (Peru) by Purca and Henostroza (2017) and de la Torre et al. (2020), but in lower proportion compared to the other types of MP. Among all the types of MP, fragments predominated with an average of 46.7% per beach, except for Mollendo Beach, where the predominant type was film (60.0%), the second most abundant MP on the other beaches with an average of 35.9%. In the case of fibers, the average for each beach was 4.4% (Fig. 3a). The results obtained bear out the predominance of fragments following other research conducted on sandy beaches in South America (Hidalgo-Ruz and Thiel 2013, de Carvalho and Baptista 2016, Purca and Henostroza 2017) and other parts of the world (Corcoran et al. 2009, Karthik et al. 2018, Rezania et al. 2018). Likewise, within the fragment type, it was possible to find hard plastics that are also common in other Peruvian reports (Purca and Henostroza 2017, de la Torre et al. 2020). Moreover, foams were also present in the three studied beaches with a higher abundance than fibers. In the characterization, it was found that most of the particles corresponded to expanded polystyrene (EPS), which could come from widely used packaging to carry food, especially by tourists during the summer season. These results would agree with Browne et al. (2010) since most of the plastics found in beaches such as those ones found in Islay would come from garbage and candy bags and even construction elements. The latter can be incorporated as MP by photodegradation and abrasion processes to sandy beaches.

Fig. 3 Percentage of types of microplastics per beach evaluated, number of particles (n), frequency of occurrence (fo), and mean per square meter (x̄) in a) independent beaches (Mollendo, Motobomba, Punta de Bombón) and b) beaches influenced by the Tambo river estuary (Santuario and Catas). 

Distribution of microplastics on beaches adjacent to the Tambo River

No statistical differences were found between the beaches influenced by the Tambo River estuary (t = 0.75, df = 24.0, P = 0.46). A total of 157 MP were reported, with an interval from 0 to 32 part/m2 and a mean of 4.36 part/m2, which is also reported by other investigations in estuarine or river mouth areas with higher values of particles per square meter (Brown et al. 2010, Wessel et al. 2016, Gray et al. 2018). For Catas Beach, a higher number of total MP (94 particles, X̅ = 5.2 part/m2) were found compared to Santuario Beach (63 particles, X̅ = 3.5 part/m2; Fig. 3b), presenting also higher values than the beaches evaluated independently (Mollendo and Punta de Bombón), and even higher than Motobomba Beach, despite the lower sampling effort on the beaches adjacent to the Tambo River. The greater quantity and frequency of MP on these beaches could be explained by the possible contribution of the Tambo River as a source of microplastics input from upstream areas and as the main factor in the spatial distribution of MP on the adjacent coasts. It is known that rivers drag debris (millions of tons per year), including MP (Fendall and Sewell 2009, Browne et al. 2011, Rech et al. 2014, Yu et al. 2018). Presumably, the concentration of MP will increase over time for all these areas since there are neither adequate water treatment plants (WWTP) in the area nor any system that includes a plastic particle filtering system (Andrady 2011, Browne et al. 2011). In addition, seasonal variations, such as in the intensity of wind and rain during summer, could also temporarily increase the concentration of microplastics (Lebreton et al. 2017, Lozoya et al. 2021). Furthermore, the studied beaches would correspond to the dissipative type, which tends to present a greater abundance of microplastics (Lozoya et al. 2021, Tsukada et al. 2021) due to the morphodynamics (extension, slope, granulometry) that facilitate the deposition of these plastic particles.

Regarding the type of MP, fragments were also the most abundant in both beaches, especially in Santuario Beach, where about 80% of the particles found corresponded to this type. In contrast, for Catas Beach, fragments and fibers were equally dominant, with about 30% each (Fig. 3b). This tendency is similar to that in an estuary of the Cantabrian coast (Masiá et al. 2019) and India (Karthik et al. 2018), in the latter, it was found that the proportion of fragments was usually higher (~ 10% to 20%) in areas without influence of the river, or further away from it.

No significant differences were found regarding the distribution of microplastics in the sampling stations distant from the river mouth (Chi-square: χ2= 7.60, df = 5, P = 0.180). A large amount of MP was found in the stations near Catas Beach (stations A and B), so the most significant accumulation of MP would happen between the first 2 km from the mouth of the Tambo River (4 - 35 particles) in a southerly direction. Regarding the stations at Santuario Beach, a more significant number of MP were found at stations B and C, with almost no MP in the sector closest to the river (Fig. 4a). As previously mentioned, for beaches influenced by the wind, this is usually the primary variable in the distribution of MP as they will settle in the direction of the wind (Kim et al. 2015, Karthik et al. 2018). In the case of Islay, the predominance of the wind comes from the South-East. The above, combined with the coastal currents of the area (Jambeck et al. 2015), would be a more significant settlement of microplastics in the Catas sector and drag the particles farther away from Santuario Beach. The absence of differences in MP concentration at different distances from the mouth of Tambo River corroborates the findings of other research (Browne et al. 2010, Wessel et al. 2016, Gray et al. 2018) in estuarine areas and bays (such as USA and England), and in beaches or areas adjacent to rivers, where the effect and distribution of MP is usually similar; however, this can change quickly due to the great dynamics of these systems, that can be modified even in different seasons of the year (Wessel et al. 2016). Likewise, this study represents the first approach to MP as contaminants on sandy beaches in the southwestern sector of Peru during the last few years. It is among the few related to the influence of rivers on the potential effect of MP distribution and accumulation. We also highlight the need for monitoring the interaction with the trophic components associated with these sandy systems to establish management perspectives, particularly with birds, especially migratory species, where this evaluated area represents a critical zone for their life cycle development.

Fig. 4 a) Distribution of total microplastic particles on beaches adjacent to the mouth of the Tambo River (Santuario and Catas) and average number of particles per square meter evaluated (x̄), “A”, “B” and “C” represent the sampling station identifier; b) Microplastic particles found in samples. 

CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrates the existence of microplastic particles along the sandy beaches of Islay (Arequipa, Peru). The particles corresponded to the types: fragments, film, fibers, and foams, with the absence of pellets in all the evaluated samples.

The number of particles found on the sandy beaches of Islay, for beaches evaluated independently, corresponded to an interval of 0 - 21 part/m2 with a mean of 1.81 part/m2; for Mollendo Beach, the predominant type of PM was film (60%), while for Motobomba and Punta Bombón beaches fragments were the predominant type with a 63.0% and 57.1% predominance, respectively.

Besides, for beaches influenced by the Tambo River, the interval of MP found was 0 - 32 part/m2 and a mean of 4.36 part/m2; for Santuario Beach, the predominant type was fragments with 83%, and for Catas Beach the predominance was fibers (43%).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the laboratory of the Ecology and Conservation Section of the Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa for the facilities and equipment provided for processing the samples. We also thank the anonymous reviewers who contributed to improving this paper and Cristian Tejada Perez for proofreading and improving the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

Abayomi O.A., P Range M.A., Al-Ghouti J.P., Obbard S.H., Almeer S.H. and Ben-Hamadou R. (2017). Microplastics in coastal environments of the Arabian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin 124 (1), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.011 [ Links ]

Andrady A.L. (2011). Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62 (8), 1596-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 [ Links ]

Browne M.A., Crump P., Niven S.J., Teuten E., Tonkin A., Galloway T. and Thompson R. (2011). Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environmental Science and Technology 45 (21), 9175-9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s [ Links ]

Browne M.A., Galloway T.S. and Thompson R.C. (2010). Spatial patterns of plastic debris along estuarine shorelines. Environmental Science and Technology 44 (9), 3404-3409. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903784e [ Links ]

Cho Y., Shim W.J., Jang M., Han G.M. and Hong S.H. (2019). Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in market bivalves from South Korea. Environmental Pollution 245, 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.11.091 [ Links ]

Clark J.R., Cole M., Lindeque P.K., Fileman E., Blackford J., Lewis C., Lenton T.M. and Galloway T.S. (2016). Marine microplastic debris: a targeted plan for understanding and quantifying interactions with marine life. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1297 [ Links ]

Corcoran P.L., Biesinger M.C. and Grifi M. (2009). Plastics and beaches: A degrading relationship. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58 (1), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.08.022 [ Links ]

Crawford B.C. and Quinn B. (2017). Microplastic pollutants. 1st ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 315 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04315-5 [ Links ]

de Carvalho D.G. and Baptista-Neto J.A. (2016). Microplastic pollution of the beaches of Guanabara Bay, Southeast Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management 128, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.04.009 [ Links ]

de la Torre G.E., Dioses-Salinas D.C., Castro J.M., Antay R., Fernández N.Y., Espinoza-Morriberón D. and Saldaña-Serrano M. (2020). Abundance and distribution of microplastics on sandy beaches of Lima, Peru. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151, 110877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110877 [ Links ]

de la Torre G.E., Rakib M., Pizarro-Ortega C. I. and Dioses-Salinas D.C. (2021). Occurrence of personal protective equipment (PPE) associated with the COVID-19 pandemic along the coast of Lima, Peru. The Science of the Total Environment 774, 145774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145774 [ Links ]

Eriksson C., Burton H., Fitch S., Schulz M. and van den Hoff J. (2013). Daily accumulation rates of marine debris on sub-Antarctic island beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 66 (1-2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.026 [ Links ]

Fang C., Zheng R., Zhang Y., Hong F., Mu J., Chen M., Song P., Lin L., Lin H., Le F. and Bo J. (2018). Microplastic contamination in benthic organisms from the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. Chemosphere 209, 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.101 [ Links ]

Fendall L.S. and Sewell M.A. (2009). Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: Microplastics in facial cleansers. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58 (8), 1225-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025 [ Links ]

Gray A.D., Wertz H., Leads R.R. and Weinstein J.E. (2018). Microplastic in two South Carolina estuaries: Occurrence, distribution, and composition. Marine Pollution Bulletin 128, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.030 [ Links ]

Hidalgo-Ruz V. and Thiel M. (2013). Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): A study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research 87/88, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015 [ Links ]

Hidalgo-Ruz V., Gutow L., Thompson R.C. and Thiel M. (2012). Microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environmental Science and Technology 46 (6), 3060-3075. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2031505 [ Links ]

Iannacone J., Huyhua A., Alvariño L., Valencia F., Principe F., Minaya D., Ortega J., Argota G. and Castañeda L. (2019). Microplásticos en la zona de marea alta y supralitoral de una playa arenosa del litoral costero del Perú. The Biologist 17 (2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.24039/rtb2019172369 [ Links ]

INEI (2018). Arequipa. Resultados definitivos. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática - Sistema Estadístico Nacional, Censos Nacionales 2017, Arequipa, Peru [online] Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática - Sistema Estadístico Nacional, Censos Nacionales 2017, Arequipa, Peru [online]https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1551/04TOMO_01.pdf 20/05/2022 [ Links ]

Isobe A., Uchiyama-Matsumotob K., Uchidac K. and Tokaic T. (2015). East Asian seas: A hotspot of pelagic microplastics. Marine Pollution Bulletin 101 (2), 618-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.042 [ Links ]

Ivar do Sul J.A. and Costa M.F. (2007). Marine debris review for Latin America and the Wider Caribbean Region: From the 1970s until now and where do we go from here?. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54 (8), 1087-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.05.004 [ Links ]

Jambeck J.R., Geyer R., Wilcox C., Siegler T.R., Perryman M., Andrady A., Narayan R. and Law K.L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347, 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 [ Links ]

Karthik R., Robin R.S., Purvaja R., Ganguly D., Anandavelu I., Raghuraman R. and Ramesh R. (2018). Microplastics along the beaches of southeast coast of India. Science of The Total Environment 645, 1388-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.242 [ Links ]

Kim I., Chae D., Kim S., Choi S. and Woo S. (2015). Factors influencing the spatial variation of microplastics on high-tidal coastal beaches in Korea. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 69, 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0155-6 [ Links ]

Kunz A., Walther B.A., Löwemark L. and Lee Y.C. (2016). Distribution and quantity of microplastic on sandy beaches along the northern coast of Taiwan. Marine Pollution Bulletin 111 (1), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.07.022 [ Links ]

Kutralam-Muniasamy G., Pérez-Guevara F., Elizalde-Martínez I. and Shruti V.C. (2020). Branded milks - Are they immune from microplastics contamination? The Science of the Total Environment 714, 136823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136823 [ Links ]

Lebreton L., Van Der Zwet J., Damsteeg W.D., Slat B., Andrady A. and Reisser J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nature Communications 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611 [ Links ]

Leslie H.A., van Velzen M., Brandsma S.H., Vethaak A.D., Garcia-Vallejo J.J. and Lamoree M.H. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International 163, 107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199 [ Links ]

Losh S. (2015). A proposed method to analyze meso- and micro-plastic pollution on beaches in Oregon. Honors College Thesis, Baccalaureate of Science in Environmental Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA, 45 pp. [ Links ]

Lozoya J.P., Teixeira de Mello F., Carrizo D., Weinstein F., Olivera Y., Cedrés F. and Fossati M. (2016). Plastics and microplastics on recreational beaches in Punta del Este (Uruguay): Unseen critical residents? Environmental Pollution 218, 931-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.041 [ Links ]

Martinez E., Maamaatuaiahutapu K. and Taillandier V. (2009). Floating marine debris surface drift: convergence and accumulation toward the South Pacific subtropical gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58 (9), 1347-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.022 [ Links ]

Masiá P., Ardura A. and Garcia-Vazquez E. (2019). Microplastics in special protected areas for migratory birds in the Bay of Biscay. Marine Pollution Bulletin 146, 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.065 [ Links ]

Nadeeka G., Mahesh J.D., Yakupitiyage A. and Chavanich S. (2017). Effects of microplastics on sessile invertebrates in the eastern coast of Thailand: An approach to coastal zone conservation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 124 (1), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.010 [ Links ]

Nel H.A. and Froneman P.W. (2015). A quantitative analysis of microplastic pollution along the south-eastern coastline of South Africa. Marine Pollution Bulletin 101 (1), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.043 [ Links ]

Peng L., Fu D., Qi H., Lan C.Q., Yu H. and Ge C. (2020). Micro- and nano-plastics in marine environment: Source, distribution and threats - A review. The Science of the Total Environment 698, 134254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134254 [ Links ]

Perez-Venegas D.J., Toro-Valdivieso C., Ayala F., Brito B., Iturra L., Arriagada M., Seguel M., Barrios C., Sepúlveda M., Oliva D. and Cardenas-Alayza S. (2020). Monitoring the occurrence of microplastic ingestion in Otariids along the Peruvian and Chilean coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin 153, 110966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110966 [ Links ]

PE (2020). Plastics -The facts 2020: An analysis of European plastic production, demand and waste data. Brussels, Belgium. PlasticsEurope [online]. https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub 06/11/2021 [ Links ]

Pretell V., Pinedo L., Ramos W. and Benites E. (2020). Evaluación y caracterización de microplásticos en tres playas arenosas de Lima, Perú. Proceedings. 18th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2020.1.1.71 [ Links ]

Purca S. and Henostroza A. (2017). Presencia de microplásticos en cuatro playas arenosas de Perú. Revista Peruana de Biología 24 (1), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v24i1.12724 [ Links ]

Rech S., Macaya-Caquilpán V., Pantoja J.F., Rivadeneira M., Madariaga D.J. and Thiel M. (2014). Rivers as a source of marine litter - A study from the SE Pacific. Marine Pollution Bulletin 82 (1-2), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.019 [ Links ]

Rezania S., Park J., Din M.F., Mat-Taib S., Talaiekhozani A., Kumar-Yadav K. and Kamyab H. (2018). Microplastics pollution in different aquatic environments and biota: A review of recent studies. Marine Pollution Bulletin 133, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.022 [ Links ]

Rist S., Carney B., Hartmann N. and Karlsson T.M. (2018). A critical perspective on early communications concerning human health aspects of microplastics. Science of the Total Environment 626, 720-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.092 [ Links ]

Rojo-Nieto E. and Montoto T. (2017). Basuras marinas, plásticos y microplásticos: orígenes, impactos y consecuencias de una amenaza global. 1st ed. Ecologistas en Acción, Madrid, Spain, 53 pp. [ Links ]

RST (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, USA http://www.rstudio.com/Links ]

Tsukada E., Fernandes E., Vidal C. and Salla R.F. (2021). Beach morphodynamics and its relationship with the deposition of plastic particles: A preliminary study in southeastern Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 172, 112809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112809 [ Links ]

Urban-Malinga B., Zalewski M., Jakubowska A., Wodzinowski T., Malinga M., Pałys B. and Dąbrowska A. (2020). Microplastics on sandy beaches of the southern Baltic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 155, 111170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111170 [ Links ]

UNEP (2021). From pollution to solution: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. Nairobi, Kenya [online]. https://www.unep.org/ 15/06/2022 [ Links ]

Valencia-Velasco F., Guabloche-Zuñiga A., Alvariño L. and Iannacone J. (2020). Estandarización de un protocolo para evaluar microplasticos en bivalvos marinos en el departamento de Lima. Perú. The Biologist 18 (1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.24039/rtb2020181478 [ Links ]

Velander K. and Mocogni M. (1999). Beach litter sampling strategies: Is there a “best” method?. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38 (12), 1134-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00143-5 [ Links ]

Wessel C.C., Lockridge G.R., Battiste D. and Cebrian J. (2016). Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in beach sediments: Insights into microplastic accumulation in northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin 109 (1), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.002 [ Links ]

Wright S.L., Thompson R.C. and Galloway T.S. (2013). The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: A review. Environment Pollution 178, 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031 [ Links ]

Yu X., Ladewig S., Bao S., Toline C.A., Whitmire S. and Chow A.T. (2018). Occurrence and distribution of microplastics at selected coastal sites along the southeastern United States. Science of the Total Environment 613-614, 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.100 [ Links ]

Received: November 01, 2021; Accepted: September 01, 2022

* Author for correspondence: cluquef@unsa.edu.pe

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License