SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38Comparación de la actividad de butirilcolinesterasa entre habitantes de una zona rural y una urbana de Guerrero, MéxicoEFECTOS Y CARACTERIZACIÓN DE NANOPARTÍCULAS ATMOSFÉRICAS (NP-CuO, ZnO) EN PLANTAS índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista internacional de contaminación ambiental

versión impresa ISSN 0188-4999

Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient vol.38  Ciudad de México  2022  Epub 28-Feb-2023

https://doi.org/10.20937/rica.54610 

Articles

Acute toxicity of the herbicide karmex (diuron) in Macrobrachium acanthurus and M. olfersii prawns

Toxicidad aguda del herbicida karmex (diuron) en langostinos Macrobrachium acanthurus y M. olfersii

Sergio Cházaro-Olvera1  * 

Jesús Montoya-Mendoza2 

María del Refugio Castañeda-Chávez2 

Fabiola Lango-Reynoso2 

Vanesa Chaparro-Medina1 

1 Laboratorio de Crustáceos, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. de los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, C.P. 54090, México.

2 Laboratorio de Investigación de Acuícola Aplicada. Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río. Km 12, carretera Veracruz-Córdoba, Boca del Río, Veracruz, México.


ABSTRACT

Farmers have increased the production of food by using chemical substances such as diuron; however, these components affect the water quality and the species found in these ecosystems. Macrobrachium acanthurus and M. olfersii postlarvae present in the estuary of Río Jamapa, Veracruz were collected to measure the LC50 and LD50 using the herbicide Karmex (diuron: (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea [DCMU]). The captures of the prawns were made with light traps. Acute toxicity bioassays were carried out at 96 h to determine the mean lethal concentration (LC50). In the experimental design, a geometric series was used considering the control and five concentrations of the herbicide (1.75, 3.5, 6.99, 14, and 28 mg/L). The data analysis was carried out with the Probit method. A maximum LC50 of 10.233 mg/L and LD50 of 8.221 mg/L of Karmex were obtained for M. acanthurus and a maximum LC50 of 9.242 mg/L and LD50 of 7.504 mg/L of Karmex were obtained for M. olfersii. The average lethal concentration was consistent with those of other crustaceans, such as Artemia salina and Daphnia. Based on the response in the bioassays, Macrobrachium acanthurus and M. olfersii postlarvae can be used in toxicology studies.

Key words: estuary; Decapoda; shrimp; diversity; pesticide

RESUMEN

Los agricultores han aumentado la producción de alimentos mediante el uso de sustancias químicas como el Diurón; sin embargo, estos componentes afectan la calidad del agua y las especies que se encuentran en estos ecosistemas. Se recolectaron postlarvas de Macrobrachium acanthurus y M. olfersii presentes en el estuario del Río Jamapa, Veracruz para medir la CL50 y DL50 utilizando el herbicida Karmex (diuron: DCMU (3-(3,4-diclorofenil)-1,1-dimetilurea). Se realizaron las capturas de los langostinos con trampas de luz. Los bioensayos de toxicidad aguda se midieron a las 96 h para determinar la concentración letal media (CL50). En el diseño experimental se utilizó una serie geométrica considerando el testigo y cinco concentraciones del herbicida (1.75, 3.5, 6.99, 14 y 28 mg/L). El análisis de datos se realizó con el método Probit. Se obtuvo una CL50 máxima de 10.233 mg/L y una DL50 de 8.221 mg/L de Karmex para M. acanthurus y una CL50 máxima de 9.242 mg/L y DL50 de 7.504 mg/L de Karmex para M. olfersii. La concentración letal promedio fue consistente con la de otros crustáceos, como Artemia salina y Daphnia. Con base en la respuesta en los bioensayos, se pueden utilizar postlarvas de Macrobrachium acanthurus y M. olfersii en estudios de toxicología.

Palabras clave: estuario; Decapoda; camarones; diversidad; plaguicida

INTRODUCTION

Farmers have implemented measures to increase the production of food due to its growing demand, including the use of chemical substances, such as herbicides (FAO 1997). In the Hydrological Region 28 of Papaloapan, Veracruz (SINA 2021), diuron is an agrochemical used in agriculture (Zuleta-Rodríguez and Vázquez-Torres 1992).

In the state of Veracruz, shrimp production comes from artisanal capture and aquaculture (CONA-PESCA 2018). However, the production of shrimp presents various problems that make it an activity vulnerable to external factors such as water quality in collection sites and cultivation activities (Gil-Díaz 2020).

The herbicide diuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea [DCMU]) belongs to the group of nitrogenous cyclodiene pesticides. Its economic importance is due to its use in the control of broadleaf weeds, grasses, cotton, banana, corn, sorghum, pineapple, citrus, and mainly sugarcane (UNA 2021). It is a potential contaminant of groundwater due to transport from farmland (INECC 2019, UNA 2021).

Studies in the field about the dissipation of diuron showed that the maximum amount in the sediment at the bottom was 0.76 mg/L immediately after application, which declined to 0.13 mg/L after four days and was detected at 0.066 mg/L in samples taken 256 days after application (Turner 2003). In analyses of water, Proia et al. (2011) reported pulses of up to 0.134 mg/L in the Llobregat river (NE Spain).

In Mexico, about 44 commercial brands contain the active ingredient in percentages of around 80 %. diuron is highly persistent (up to one year) in aquatic environments, and microorganisms are the main agents responsible for degrading diuron. It is classified as toxic to birds, amphibians, and crustaceans, as it is soluble in water, absorbed in sandy soils, and available for organisms associated with benthos (INECC 2019), such as prawn shrimp of the genus Macrobrachium.

Some studies have been carried out on nitrogenous compounds on postlarvae of the species of the genus Macrobrachium. In this regard, an LC50 of 4.5 NO2-N mg/Lthe was determined for the acute toxicity of nitrite to larvae of the giant Malaysian prawn, M. rosenbergii De Man, 1879 (Armstrong et al. 1976). Alternatively, LC50 values of 21.14 and 21.65 mg/L were determined for the acute toxicity of ammonia to various life stages of the Amazon River prawn, M. amazonicum, Heller, 1862 (Dutra et al. 2016). Regarding the species used in this study, the acute toxicity of carbofuran in M. olfersii was assessed by Barbieri et al. (2016), who determined an LC50 of 0.42 mg/L. In addition, the acute toxicity of the herbicide Dasurquat (paraquat) in the shrimp was assessed, and a LC50 of 0.31 µL/L (3.8 mg/L) was found (Gil-Díaz 2020). However, there are no studies about the use of diuron on the species M. acanthururs and M. olfersii.

An LC50 of 12 to 16 mg/L was obtained in other crustaceans with tests of acute toxicity for diuron, (Turner 2003, Koutsaftis and Aoyama 2008, Alyürük and Çavaş 2013, Shaalaa et al. 2015). Therefore, diuron produces mortality at high concentrations. However, lower concentrations can alter the neurotransmitters, hormones, immune response, reproduction, physiology, morphology, or behavior (Relyea and Hoverman 2006).

The prawn M. acanthurus (Wiegmann 1836) is distributed from North Carolina in the United States to Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil (García et al. 2013). The information available for this species is scattered, fragmented, or covers very specific aspects (Hernández-Hernández 2016). On the other hand, M. olfersii (Wiegmann 1836) is distributed from the Baluarte River, Sinaloa to El Naranjo, Chiapas, and along the Atlantic slope from St. Agustine Florida to Santa Catarina, Brazil (Hernández 2007). For larvae and postlarvae of M. acanthurus and M. olfersii in the study area, only the studies of Salas-de la Rosa (2018) and Arias-Martínez (2020) are known. Given the above, the present study aimed to establish the mean lethal concentration (LC50) in the postlarvae of the species M. acanthurus and M. olfersii to exposure to the agrochemical Karmex (diuron) used in crops in the Río Jamapa, Veracruz region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

The estuary of the Jamapa River is formed by the confluence of the Cotaxtla and Jamapa rivers. The Jamapa River arises at the limit of the states of Puebla and Veracruz with the name of Barranca de Coscomatepec. It continues its course towards the east, crosses farmlands, and forms meanders and alluvial terraces up to the the Ixcualco stream. From there, it flows into the Cotaxtla River, which flows to the Moreno River and the Mandinga Grande Lagoon. Finally, it empties into the Gulf of Mexico in the town of Boca del Río, Veracruz. The Jamapa River basin is located between 18º45’ and 19º14’ north latitude, and between 95º56’ and 97º17’ west longitude. The area has a warm subhumid climate with a higher annual average temperature of 22 ºC, and the temperature of the coldest month is 18 ºC. The precipitation of the driest month is from 0 to 60 mm, and greater than 55.3 mm during the rainy season. In the season of cold fronts, the rain is from 5 to 10.2 % of the annual total. The main types of soil are Regosol and Vertisol (Fuentes-Mariles et al. 2014).

Specifically, the mouth of the Jamapa River is an estuarine system whose water discharges are rich in nutrients and reach the Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano (SAV) (Leaño-Carrera et al. 2019). The level of the river in its estuarine part has a micro-tidal modulation (< 2 m) with a semi-diurnal (~ 12 h), diurnal (~ 24 h), and lunisolar component every two weeks (~ 15 days) (Salas-Monreal et al. 2019). The Jamapa River has a navigation channel in the southern part that generates important changes in the estuary dynamics (Salas-Monreal et al. 2019). The shipping channel produces stronger currents (> 0.5 m/s) and a continuous exchange of brackish water with the ocean (~ 12 h). The southern area is more dynamic (the exchange of water from the river and the ocean is continuous) than the northern area, where the water can remain static for periods longer than 24 h, due to its low speeds and the continuous supply of water from Arroyo Moreno, showing greater pollution from the urban discharges that it receives directly (Salas-Monreal et al. 2020).

Fieldwork

The organisms were collected using light traps made with plastic boxes; their dimensions were 0.40 m long, 0.25 m wide, and 0.30 m high. The traps had four 0.025 m diameter perforations. In the lower part, a sample receiver was placed, which consisted of a mesh with a 330-µm aperture. Inside the box, a plastic grid with a mesh opening of 0.05 m and a white light lamp were placed (Cházaro-Olvera et al. 2018).

Night samplings were carried out considering the full moon phase. The traps were placed in three contiguous sites at 20:00 LT on the first day of sampling and were collected at 08:00 LT the next day. From the in vivo sample, prawns were selected for the bioassays. The environmental factors of temperature (º C), salinity (practical salinity units, PSU), dissolved oxygen (mg/L), and pH were measured in situ at 0.50 m of depth, using a Hanna HI9828 multiparameter meter equipped with HI769828DO and HI769828PH probes.

Laboratory work

The identification of the postlarvae of Macrobrachium was realized following the descriptions of Holthuis (1952): Macrobrachium acanthurus presents a straight rostrum that reaches slightly beyond the scaphocerite. The dorsal margin bears nine to 11 teeth, of which two are behind the orbit margin. The second tooth is sometimes placed partly over the posterior margin of the orbit. The lower margin bears four to seven (generally six) teeth, which proximally are placed closer together than distally. The carapace is smooth; it only bears short hairs, especially in the anterolateral region. The second legs are equal; they reach with the carpus or with a small part of the merus beyond the scaphocerite. The fingers are slender, close over their whole length and are only slightly shorter than the palm. The pleura of the fifth segment ends in an acute point. The sixth segment is 1.5 times as long as the fifth. The telson is 1.5 times as long as the 6th abdominal segment. Macrobrachium olfersii presents a straight rostrum, reaching the third joint of the antennular peduncle. The dorsal margin bears 14 to 15 teeth, of which two to three are behind the orbital margin. The ventral margin bears three to four teeth. The second pair of pereiopods with chelas unequal in shape and size. The hepatic spine is smaller than the antennal. The second legs are very unequal; the larger reaches with the entire carpus and a small part of the merus beyond the scaphocerite; outer surface with smooth central area surrounded by spines and ornamented with bristles and pubescence. The pleura of the fifth segment has a rectangular top or is slightly acute. The 6th segment is slightly longer than the fifth. The telson is 1.5 times as long as the 6th abdominal segment.

Bioassays

Live specimens for bioassays were placed in transparent 500-mL containers with 100 mL of water from the site previously filtered and constant aeration using Elite 802 air pumps.To carry out the bioassays, 10 postlarvae were used for each 500-mL plastic container following the criteria of Mohapatra and Rengarajan (1995). The agrochemical used was obtained from the commercial brand Karmex (diuron: 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea [DCMU] with 80 % active ingredient). Preliminary 96 h static bioassays were carried out to determine the concentration ranges of the definitive bioassays. The concentrations used were 0, 1.75, 3.5, 6.96, 14, and 28 mg/L (Castro-Castro et al. 2005). In each bioassay, three replicates were used. Mortality readings were taken after 1, 2, 4, 8, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 96 h of exposure (Uc-Peraza and Delgado-Blas 2012). For the acute toxicity bioassays, the guidelines of the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA 2016a) were followed for ecological effects tests (USEPA 2016b). On the other hand, to complement the information about toxicity of Karmex (diuron) on Macrobrachim, the LD50 with Probit-Log(dose) lineal regression models were obtained. Subsequently, ANOVA tests to assess significance and goodness of fit to the regression models were applied (p < 0.05) (Bustos-Obregón and Vargas 2010). To test if LD50 were significantly lower than LC50 a paired t test was applied (Ross and Willson 2017).

Statistical analysis

To determine the statistical significance of the concentration variability of Karmex (diuron) for the two species of Macrobrachium, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey comparisons test were used (Zar 1999). The mean lethal concentration (LC50) was determined with the statistical program Minitab v. 18.1 (Minitab, LLC, State College PA, USA), and the 95 % confidence intervals were obtained. The LD50 linear regression models and the respective graphics were obtained with the statistical program Microsoft Excel 365. The paired t test was applied with PAST software v. 3.26 (Harmer et al. 2001).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The dissolved oxygen in the Río Jamapa estuary was 6.7 mg/L, pH was 8.7, temperature was 27 ºC, and salinity was 0.72 ± 0.18 and 13.89 ± 5.48 PSU in March and October, respectively. For the bioassays, the values of the environmental parameters were maintained following the collection values (Table I). The values of the parameters are consistent with those recorded in the study area by Houbron (2010), Jasso-Montoya (2012), Aké-Castillo et al. (2016)), Castañeda-Chávez et al. (2017), González-Vázquez et al. (2019) and Salas-Monreal et al. (2020).

TABLE I PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL FACTORS: ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS FOR THE COLLECTION OF Macrobrachium acanthurus AND M. olfersii IN THE BOCA DEL RÍO, VERACRUZ, ESTUARY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE LABORATORY DURING THE BIOASSAYS. 

Environmental conditions in the Boca del Río estuary
Environmental factors March October
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) 6.63 ± 0.22 6.69 ± 0.12
pH 8.6 ± 0.21 8.61 ± 0.11
Temperature (ºC) 25.11 ± 0.12 25.08 ± 1.02
Salinity (PSU) 0.70 ± 0.01 14.09 ± 0.58
Environmental conditions in the laboratory during the bioassays
Environmental factors March October
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) 6.72 ± 0.12 6.73 ± 0.15
pH 8.70 ± 0.32 8.71 ± 0.32
Temperature (ºC) 27.41 ± 0.45 27.38 ± 1.09
Salinity (PSU) 0.72 ± 0.18 13.99 ± 5.48

PSU: practical salinity units.

The differences in mortality among the concentrations of Karmex (diuron) for the two species of Macrobrachium determined by ANOVA are greater than would be expected by chance; there is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), which estimated with Tukey’s test was found between all concentrations (p < 0.05), except for 1.75 and 3.5 mg/L (p = 0.056).

The maximum concentration of Karmex (diuron) of 28 mg/L caused mortality rates of 100 % in both Macrobrachium species (Table II). With the Probit analysis, an LC50 of 8.77 mg/L of Karmex (diuron) for M. acanthurus at 96 h for March was found, with a 95 % confidence interval of 7.67 to 9.92 mg/L (Fig. 1a). For October, the LC50 was 9.04 mg/L, with a 95 % confidence interval of 7.92 to 10.23 mg/L (Fig. 1b).

TABLE II CUMULATIVE MORTALITY (%) AT 96 HOURS IN THE BIOASSAYS WITH Macrobrachium acanthurus AND M. olfersii CARRIED OUT ON TWO SAMPLING DATES (MARCH AND OCTOBER). 

Macrobrachium acanthurus
Initial date Final date Karmex (diuron) concentration (mg/L)
0 1.75 3.5 6.96 14 28
Cumulative mortality (%)
12/03/2019 17/03/2019 0 10 20 40 50 100
12/03/2019 17/03/2019 0 10 30 50 60 98
02/10/2019 06/10/2019 0 20 20 40 60 100
02/10/2019 06/10/2019 0 10 20 40 50 98
Macrobrachium olfersii
Karmex (diuron) concentration (mg/L)
12/03/2019 17/03/2019 0 10 20 50 60 100
12/03/2019 17/03/2019 0 10 30 50 60 98
02/10/2019 06/10/2019 0 20 20 60 80 100
02/10/2019 06/10/2019 0 10 20 40 60 98

Fig. 1 Mean lethal concentration (LC50) of Karmex (diuron) for Macrobrachium acanthurus at 96 h with upper and lower 95 % confidence intervals: (a) March, (b) October. 

With the Probit analysis, we found an LC50 of 8.14 mg/L for Karmex (diuron) in M. olfersii at 96 h for March, with a 95 % confidence interval of 7.14 to 9.24 mg/L (Fig. 2a). For October, the LC50 was 7.57 mg/L, with a 95 % confidence interval of 6.62 to 8.55 mg/L (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2 Mean lethal concentration (LC50) of Karmex (diuron) for Macrobrachium olfersii at 96 h with upper and lower confidence intervals of 95 %: A, March, and B, October. 

With the Probit-Log(dose) linear regression model, LD50 values of 7.974 and 8.221 mg/L for March and October, respectively, were obtained for M. acanthurus (Fig. 3a, b). For M. olfersii, LD50 values of 7.504 and 7.008 mg/L were obtained for March and October, respectively (Fig. 3c, d). The four correlation coefficients were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The values calculated for LC50 were higher than for LD50. Differences statistically significant between the LD50 and LC50 for M. acanthurus (t = 70.217, p = 0.009) and M. olfersii (t = 16.189, p = 0.0393) were obtained. Kamau et al. (2012) found an LD50 of 153.2 mg/L for Artemia salina with plant extracts as an alternative to synthetic insecticide. In this regard, Reed (2017) mentions that the smaller the LD50 values of a substance under test, the greater its toxicity.

Fig. 3 Lethal dose (LD50) of Karmex (diuron) with the Probit-Log(dose) lineal regression model for Macrobrachium acanthurus: (a) March, (b) October; and M. olfersii: (c) March, (d) October. 

Regarding the toxicity bioassays with 80 % diuron, an LC50 of 84 to 300 mg/L for Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819, 16 to 23.8 mg/L for Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum 1792), and 0.5 to 6.0 mg/L for Morone saxatilis (Walbaum, 1792) were found. The Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB 2021) determined that the LC50 for aquatic crustaceans is 1.1 mg/L; however, Shaalaa et al. (2015) found that for Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758) nauplii, the increase in diuron concentration increases mortality since they determined diuron LC50 values of 23.27 mg/L, 12.19 mg/L, and 6.00 mg/L after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively. Likewise, Alyürük and Çavaş (2013) found that in A. salina larvae, the EC50 value for diuron was 12.01 mg/L. Meanwhile, Koutsaftis and Aoyama (2008) reported that the LC50 value for diuron in A. franciscana (Kellog, 1906), was 12.5 mg/L. With an active ingredient concentration of 80-95 %, LC50 values of 0.16 to 0.7 mg/L were found for Gammarus fasciatus, 0.16 mg/L for Gammarus lacustris, 47 (26 h) to 8.4 (48 h) mg/L for Daphnia magna, and 15.5 mg/L for Asellus brevicauda (Turner 2003). Jinlin et al. (2020) report that the LC50 of diuron (48 h) to Daphnia magna was 17.1 mg/L and Sipcam (2020) mentions that for the same species it is 6.3-13 mg/L.

The LC50 of diuron found in this study for both M. acanthurus at 96 h (10.23 mg/L) and M. olfersii (9.24 mg/L) were slightly lower than that found for Artemia species and is consistent with species of the Cladocera suborder and peracarids.

No change in the appearance of the organisms of the two Macrobrachium species was observed. Regarding the behavior, a decrease in movement was recorded, since organisms remained for a longer time at the bottom of the container with concentrations of 6.96 to 28 mg/L; at lower concentrations, active movement of the organisms was observed throughout the container.

It is important to mention that since 1980, diuron has been used in the state of Veracruz, Mexico at a concentration of 2.0 kg/ha (Ramírez-Mora et al. 2018). This compound, like other pesticides, has the potential to enter water bodies through rain that flows down streams and rivers into estuaries and oceans (NPIC 2021). Giacomazzi and Cochet (2004) reported that diuron is a biologically active pollutant present and persistent in water and sediments. In a three-year study, Xu et al. (2013) found that the annual average amount of diuron in seawater and sediments presented a slow-growing trend, indicating that diuron poses a potential risk to the aquatic ecosystems, like in our case, the estuary of the Jamapa River.

Thus, according to the previous values, there are differences in the resistance of exposure to diuron among species, which highlights the importance of knowing the effect of concentration of contaminants (such as herbicides) in species used in aquaculture.

According to the above and considering the studies of toxicity realized by Barbieri et al. (2016) with carbofuran and Gil-Díaz (2020) with paraquat in M. olfersii, as well as Marques et al. (2021) with chlorpyrifos in M. acanthurus, it is possible to consider that the postlarvae of Macrobrachium can be used as a suitable test organisms to evaluate the toxicity of diuron and other pesticides. Given the relevant role of prawn shrimp in aquatic environments and its use for human consumption, its inclusion in ecotoxicological studies is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The lethal concentrations of Karmex (diuron) for two species of Macrobrachium were greater than 3.5 mg/L. The maximum concentration of diuron (28 mg/L) caused a 100 % mortality rate in both Macrobrachium species. The LC50 and LD50 of diuron found in this study for both M. acanthurus (LC50 = 10.23 mg/L, LD50 = 8.221 mg/L) and M. olfersii (LC50 = 9.24 mg/L, LD50 = 7.504 mg/L) at 96 h were lower than that found for Artemia species and are consistent with the values for species of the Cladocera suborder. Considering the above, Macrobrachium postlarvae can be used as test organisms to evaluate the toxicity of Karmex (diuron).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the support received from the Instituto Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río Veracruz (ITBOCA), to carry out this study. The first author thanks the H. Technical Council of the Facultad de Estudios Superiores for approving the sabbatical year and the PASPA 2021 Program of the National Autonomous University of Mexico for support with the sabbatical year at ITBOCA. Thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions that increased the quality of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

Aké-Castillo J.A., Rodríguez-Gómez C.F., Perales-Valdivia H. and Sanay-González R. (2016). Florecimiento de Heterocapsa rotundata (Dinophyta) en el estuario río Jamapa, Veracruz. In: Florecimientos algales nocivos en México (García-Mendoza E., Quijano-Scheggia S.I., Olivos-Ortiz A. and Núñez-Vázquez E.J., Eds.). CICESE, Ensenada, Mexico, pp. 323-334. [ Links ]

Alyürük H. and Çavaş L. (2013). Toxicities of diuron and irgarol on the hatchability and early-stage development of Artemia salina. Turkish Journal of Biology 37, 151-57. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1205-39 [ Links ]

Armstrong D.A., Stephenson M.J. and Knight A.W. (1976). Acute toxicity of nitrite to larvae of the giant Malaysian prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture 9, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(76)90046-6 [ Links ]

Arias-Martínez A. (2020). Análisis de la comunidad de macrocrustáceos presentes en las estructuras artificiales (escolleras) del Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano (PNSAV) durante 2016-2017. M.Sc. Thesis. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 86 pp. [ Links ]

Barbieri E., Moreira P., Luchini L.A., Ruiz-Hidalgo K. and Muñoz A. (2016). Assessment of acute toxicity of carbofuran in Macrobrachium olfersii (Wiegmann, 1836) at different temperature levels. Toxicology and Industrial Health 32 (1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233713484655 [ Links ]

Bustos-Obregón E. and Vargas Á. (2010). Chronic toxicity bioassay with populations of the crustacean Artemia salina exposed to the organophosphate diazinon. Biological Research 43 (3), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-97602010000300013 [ Links ]

Castañeda-Chávez M., Sosa-Villalobos R., Amaro-Espejo A.C., Galaviz-Villa I.A. and Lango-Reynoso F. (2017). Eutrophication in the lower coastal basin of the Jamapa River in Veracruz, Mexico. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah 5 (12), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1133874 [ Links ]

Castro-Castro V., Siu-Rodas Y., González-Huerta L. and Sokolov Y.M. (2005). Efecto tóxico de DDT y endosulfán en postlarvas de camarón blanco, Litopenaeus vannamei (Decapoda: Penaeidae) de Chiapas, México. Revista de Biología Tropical 53 (1-2), 141-151. [ Links ]

CONAPESCA (2018). Anuario estadístico de acuacultura y pesca 2018. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca, Mexico City [online]. https://nube.conapesca.gob.mx/sites/cona/dgppe/2018/ANUARIO_2018.pdf 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Cházaro-Olvera S., Robles R., Montoya-Mendoza J. and Herrera-López J.A. (2018). Intraspecific variation in megalopae of Clibanarius antillensis (Anomura, Diogenidae) among western Atlantic populations. Nauplius 26, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2018031 [ Links ]

Dutra F.M., Forneck S.C., razão C.C., Freire C.A. and Ballester E.L.C. (2016). Acute toxicity of ammonia to various life stages of the Amazon River prawn, Macrobrachium amazonicum, Heller, 1862. Aquaculture 453, 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.038 [ Links ]

FAO (1997). Lucha contra la contaminación agrícola de los recursos hídricos. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Burlington, Canada [online]. https://shortest.link/2aM7 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Fuentes-Mariles O.A., Franco V., Luna-Cruz F., Vélez-Morales L. and Morales-Rodríguez H.L. (2014). Caracterización fluvial e hidráulica de las inundaciones en México. Convenio CNA-SGT-GASIR-09/2014. Organismo de cuenca X Golfo centro ciudad de Veracruz. Veracruz, ríos Jamapa y Cotaxtla. Comisión Nacional del Agua e Instituto de Ingeniería, UNAM. Mexico City [online]. https://shortest.link/2hd7 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

García-Guerrero M.U., Becerril-Morales F., Vega-Villasante F. and Espinosa-Chaurand L.D. (2013). Los langostinos del género Macrobrachium con importancia económica y pesquera en América Latina: conocimiento actual, rol ecológico y conservación. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 41 (4), 651-675. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol41-issue4-fulltext-3 [ Links ]

Giacomazzi S. and Cochet N. (2004). Environmental impact of diuron transformation: A review. Chemosphere 56 (11), 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.061 [ Links ]

Gil-Díaz D. (2020). Uso del herbicida paraquat en el centro del estado de Veracruz y su potencial riesgo para especies acuáticas. Instituto tecnológico de boca del río. M.Sc. Thesis. Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico, 73 pp. [ Links ]

González-Vázquez J.A., Hernández-Vivar E., Rojas-Serna C. and del Valle-Morales J. (2019). Diagnosis of water circulation in an estuary: A case study of the Jamapa River and the Mandinga lagoons, Veracruz, Mexico. Ciencias Marinas 45 (1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v45i1.2923 [ Links ]

Harmer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 1-9. [ Links ]

Hernández-Hernández L.H. (2016). Contribution to the knowledge of nutrient requirements of the native freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium acanthurus). Hidrobiológica 26 (1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/hidro/2016v26n1/hernandez [ Links ]

Hernández M.L.G. (2007). Revisión sistemática del género Macrobrachium (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) de la península de Baja California, México. Ph.D. Thesis. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico, 133 pp. [ Links ]

Holthuis L.B. (1952). A general revision of the Palaemonidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Natantia) of the Americas. Part. II. The subfamily Palaemoninae. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications. Occasional Papers 12, 1-396. [ Links ]

Houbron E. (2010). Calidad del agua. In: Atlas del patrimonio natural, histórico y cultural de Veracruz. ( E.Florescano,J.Ortíz-Escamilla, Eds). Gobierno del estado de Veracruz, Xalapa, Mexico, pp 147-159. [ Links ]

INECC (2019). Diuron. Plaguicidas. Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático, Mexico City [online]. http://www2.inecc.gob.mx/sistemas/plaguicidas/pdf/diuron.pdf 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Jasso-Montoya J. (2012). Variación de los parámetros oceanográficos alrededor del Arrecife Verde en el Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano (Golfo de México occidental). M.Sc. Thesis. Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico, 71 pp. [ Links ]

Jinlin C., X. Yujie, G. Liang, C. Jiahong, L. Jiahui, Y. Mingxuan, X. Yijin, C. Guilan, F. Baoxin, H. Jiawei, M. Chengfang and Guoqu Z. (2020). Acute and chronic toxicity to Daphnia magna of diuron and capsaicin used in antifouling paints. Asian Journal of Environmental Science 3, 90-99. https://doi.org/10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191130001 [ Links ]

Kamau M.W., Kees B., Giller K.E. and Kuyvenhoven A. (2012). Determinants of labour mobility within smallholder farms in western Kenya and implications for labour use efficiency. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(23): 3375-3384. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR09.092 [ Links ]

Koutsaftis A. and Aoyama I. (2008). Toxicity of diuron and copper pyrithione on the brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana: The effects of temperature and salinity. Journal of Environmental Sciences Health A 43, 1581-1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520802329794 [ Links ]

Leaño-Carrera F., Camarena-Luhrs T., Gómez-Barrero A., Martos-Fernández F.J., Ramírez-Macias J.I. and Salas-Monreal D. (2019). New coral reef structures in a tropical coral reef system. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 47 (2), 270-281. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol47-issue2-fulltext-7 [ Links ]

Marques M.B.L., Brunetti I.A., Faleiros C.A., Cruz C., Iqbal H.M.N., Bilal M. and Américo-Pinheiro J.H.P. (2021). Ecotoxicological assessment and environmental risk of the insecticide chlorpyrifos for aquatic neotropical indicators. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 232, 428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05369-9 [ Links ]

Mwangi E.S.K., Keriko J.K., Machocho A.K., Chhabra S.C., Wanyonyi A.W. and Tarus P.K. (2012). Adulticidal activity and toxicity of extractives from Teclea trichocarpa against adult maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais). Annals Food Science and Technology 13 (2), 215-222. [ Links ]

NPIC (2021). Pesticides and water resources. National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon, USA [online]. http://npic.orst.edu/envir/waterenv.html 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

PPDB (2021). Diuron (Ref: DPX 14740). Pesticide properties database. University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom [online]. http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/260.htm 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Proia L., Morin S., Peipoch M., Romani A.M., Sabater S. (2011). Resistance and recovery of river biofilms receiving short pulses of Triclosan and Diuron. Science of the Total Environment 409: 3129-3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.013 [ Links ]

Ramírez-Mora E., Pérez-Vázquez A., Landeros-Sánchez C., Martínez-Dávila J. P., Villanueva-Jiménez J. A. and Lagunes-Espinoza L. del C. (2018). Uso histórico de plaguicidas en caña de azúcar del DR035 La Antigua, Veracruz. Acta Universitaria 28 (4), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2018.1644 [ Links ]

Reed J. (2017). What you need to know about toxicity ratings. Pasadena, Texas, USA [online]. https://shortest.link/2KGi 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Relyea R. and Hoverman J. (2006). Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: A review and synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecology Letters 9, 1157-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00966.x [ Links ]

Ross A. and Willson V.L. (2017). Basic and advanced statistical tests: Writing results sections and creating tables and figures. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 219 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8 [ Links ]

Salas-de la Rosa V. (2018). Distribución y abundancia de camarones (Dendrobranchiata y Caridea) en torno a estructuras artificiales construidas en la línea de costa del de Veracruz, México. B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 81 pp. [ Links ]

Salas-Monreal D., Riveron-Enzastiga M.L., Salas-Pérez J.J., Bernal-Ramírez R., Marín-Hernández M. and Granados-Barba A. 2019. Bathymetric flow rectification in a tropical micro-tidal estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 235, 106562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106562 [ Links ]

Salas-Monreal D., Díaz-Hernández A., Áke-Castillo J.A., Granados-Barba A. and Riverón-Enzástiga M.L. (2020). Variación anual de los parámetros hidrográficos en la confluencia del río Jamapa y arroyo Moreno (México). Intropica 15 (1), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897864.3402 [ Links ]

Shaalaa N.M.A., Zulkiflia S.Z., Ismaila A., Azmaia M.N.A. and Mohamat-Yusuffb F. (2015). Lethal concentration 50 (LC50) and effects of diuron on morphology of brine shrimp Artemia salina (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Nauplii. Environmental Sciences Proceedings 30, 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.050 [ Links ]

SINA (2021). Regiones hidrológicas (nacional). Sistema Nacional de Información del Agua, Mexico City [online]. http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/sina/tema.php?tema=regionesHidrologicas 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Sipcam (2020). Safety data sheet. Sipcam Pacific Australia, Victoria, Australia [online]. https://sipcam.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Diuron_500SC_SDS.pdf 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Turner L. (2003). Diuron analysis of risks to endangered and threatened salmon and steelhead. California, USA [online]. https://shortest.link/2aMa 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Uc-Peraza R.G. and Delgado-Blas V.H. (2012). Determinación de la concentración letal media (CL50) de cuatro detergentes domésticos biodegradables en Laeonereis culveri (Websert 1879) (Polychaeta: Annelida). Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental 28 (2), 137-144. [ Links ]

UNA (2021). Diuron. Manual de plaguicidas de Centroamérica. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Provincia de Heredia, Costa Rica [online]. https://shortest.link/2hdz 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

USEPA (2016a). Types of pesticides. United States-Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA [online]. https://shortest.link/2aMd 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

USEPA (2016b). Ecological effects test guidelines OCSPP 850.1075: Freshwater and saltwater fish acute toxicity test. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA [online]. https://shortest.link/2hdf 05/02/2022 [ Links ]

Xu H., Lu A., Yu H., Sun J. and Shen M. (2013). Distribution of diuron in coastal seawater and sediments from west sea area of Zhoushan island. Open Journal of Marine Science 3 (3), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2013.33015 [ Links ]

Zar J.H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 663 pp. [ Links ]

Zuleta-Rodríguez R. and Vázquez-Torres V. (1992). Fenología reproductiva y control de malezas en la zona cañera del ingenio La Concepción, municipio de Jilotepec, Veracruz. La Ciencia y el Hombre 12-13, 161-179. [ Links ]

Received: October 01, 2021; Accepted: February 01, 2022

* Author for correspondence: schazaro@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License