SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18Periodismo de inmersión y de marca en la información educativa y cultural. El caso de Lab de RTVEPrácticas juveniles de consumo sonoro, entre grandes plataformas y el ecosistema radiofónico: caso Colombia-España índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Comunicación y sociedad

versión impresa ISSN 0188-252X

Comun. soc vol.18  Guadalajara  2021  Epub 04-Oct-2021

https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2021.7772 

General theme

Netflix TV fiction series showrunners’ interaction and communication strategies on Twitter1

María-José Higueras-Ruiz2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-3433

Jordi Alberich-Pascual3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-4614

2 Universidad de Granada, España. mhiguer@ugr.es

3 Universidad de Granada, España. jalberich@ugr.es


Abstract

This paper studies the techniques used by showrunners to communicate with their audience on the social network Twitter. Following a literature review of the television landscape resulting from streaming services and social media, the techniques, content, and audiovisual-textual elements present in the Twitter activity of the showrunners of original Netflix TV series are quantitatively and qualitatively examined. In spite of the heterogeneous activity, the findings indicate repeated use of the TV series’ hashtag, informative/promotional tweets, and external links.

Keywords: TV series; showrunner; audience; Netflix; Twitter

Resumen

Este artículo estudia cómo los showrunners se comunican con su audiencia en la red social Twitter. Tras una revisión literaria sobre el panorama televisivo derivado de la implantación de servicios de streaming y redes sociales, se analizan cuantitativa y cualitativamente las técnicas, el contenido y los elementos audiovisuales y textuales que utilizan en Twitter los showrunners de series originales de Netflix. A pesar de la heterogeneidad de su gestión, los resultados reflejan un uso reiterado del hashtag de la serie de televisión, de los tuits informativos/promocionales y de los enlaces externos.

Palabras clave: Series de televisión; showrunner; audiencia; Netflix; Twitter

Introduction

Recent changes to the business model in the television industry have led to the revolution of this media, closely related to Internet growth in the past decade (Rincón, 2011), as well as the implementation of streaming or VOD (Video on Demand) platforms and social networks (Lotz, 2016; Van-Esler, 2016).

In today’s television industry it is also worth noting the popularity acquired by the showrunner figure: the executive producer who leads the production process of the television series, supervises all phases and holds maximum responsibility for executive and creative aspects (Higueras-Ruiz et al., 2018). The relevance of the showrunner figured in this study stems from their work in the promotion processes of fiction series, where their role is to promote a personal brand that is recognizable to the audience, contributing to the assignment of authorship of the work (Mittell, 2015), thus bestowing these professionals and their projects with critical and cultural prestige (Cascajosa-Virino, 2016). This is why the names of certain showrunners appear on advertising slogans, as a promotional tactic within the marketing strategies developed by the Hollywood television industry (Newman & Levine, 2012).

For their part, streaming services affect both the transformation of the process of creation, production and distribution of fiction series (Cascajosa-Virino, 2018), and television consumption forms and habits (Guerrero et al., 2017; Lacalle-Zalduendo & Gómez-Morales, 2017). Content is distributed over the Internet with no fixed linear programming schedule, and audiences can view content whenever and on whichever device they prefer, by paying a fee (Ojer & Capapé, 2013).

In this complicated context, it is apparent that the platform Netflix has gained importance, as a result of leadership in its home market, the United States, and in its international expansion (Izquierdo-Castillo, 2015, p. 819), and more specifically the Netflix Original seal:4 original content produced or co-produced by the platform itself. Not only do these projects build up a brand image, but they also foster subscription, as they remain in the library exclusively and indefinitely, and they respond to the interests and likes of the audience, given that they are created as a result of the audience behavior data gathered on the platform (Cornelio-Marí, 2020; Fernández-Manzano et al., 2016).

As opposed to the traditional diachronic business model, Netflix’s original content entails the synchronous creation, production and release of all episodes of a season. The showrunner is hired to produce a full television project without a prior pilot episode: a method known as straight-to-series (Carrillo-Bernal, 2018). The release of the full season eliminates the serialized screening and weekly waits associated with traditional television broadcasting, in favor of audience loyalty and stability in advertising or subscription income (Izquierdo-Castillo, 2015, p. 822). It also enables viewers to watch several episodes in one sitting, a practice known as binge-watching (Matrix, 2014).

Due to the growing hybridization of the Internet and television within the context of today’s participatory culture, communities of followers of fiction series also empower and give prominence to such series on social networks (Pearson, 2010; Scolari & Establés, 2017). Viewers acquire a renewed and emerging active role, as part of a new type of audience, who are involved in the collective following and supervision of television projects, requiring agents within the streaming industry to use new attraction and stimulation techniques and strategies on social networks (Phalen, 2018; Wayne, 2018).

Twitter and the contemporary fiction television industry

According to the annual study on global Internet use, Global Digital 2019 Report, there are 4.388 billion Internet users, an increase of 9.1% compared to the previous year (Kemp, 2019). This report also states that there are 3.484 billion active social media users worldwide, growing by 9% from January, 2018 to January, 2019. Of these users, 98% visited a social network or messaging service, and 83% actively participated in one or more social networks, the following having the greatest volume in terms of millions of monthly active accounts: Facebook (2 271), YouTube (1 900), WhatsApp (1 500), Instagram (1 000), Twitter (326), LinkedIn (303) and Snapchat (287).

Based on these data, the television industry has fostered the full inclusion of social networks in marketing campaigns for television series, both to capture and maintain the loyalty of the public, and to manage and protect the product brand (McNutt, 2018; Simons, 2014). In this regard, Segado et al. (2015) express: “Scientific literature shows how social networks have not only changed television consumption patterns but they have also affected the way in which television channels promote their content through these new tools” (p. 232).

The social network platform Twitter is of particular importance due to its connection with the television industry, and the attention received by audience and social television studies (Deller, 2011). Social activity surrounding an audiovisual product increases its popularity, having a positive effect on consumption (Halpern et al., 2016) and on possibilities of renewal (Phalen, 2018). Twitter’s capacity to promote audiovisual projects and to attract and maintain viewers by reinforcing their involvement is of particular interest to VOD platforms. In the network society, “for a streaming original, being watched is less significant than being talked about in a way that motivates people to add or maintain a subscription for the service” (Navar-Gill, 2017, p. 425).

The interest of network managers, producers and programs in the comments, replies and mentions on Twitter related to the world of television (Gallego, 2013) leads them to apply engagement strategies, such as posting different tweets, incorporating external links and the use of audiovisual elements (Quintas-Froufe & González-Neira, 2014). In the case of Netflix Spain, the characteristics of the tweets with the greatest level of engagement are the creation of original content, the use of specific language and the use of humor and suspense (Fernández-Gómez & Martín-Quevedo, 2018).

Twitter is particularly useful in the case of fiction series because it helps to maintain and increase the desire to continue talking about them between episodes and seasons. Television networks and distribution platforms create profiles on which they promote initiatives to engage the audience (Latorre-Martínez et al., 2018), as well as specific accounts for each television series associated to members of their writers’ room (Navar-Gill, 2017). Such profiles are usually managed by professionals, known as community managers (Castro-Mariño, 2016), who use the corresponding hashtag to promote the television project.

The relevance and possibilities of using Twitter while the program is on the air should also be noted (Guo, 2019). In this case, the main functions are communication with other viewers and evaluation of the content and the actors (Buschow et al., 2014). According to Halpern et al. (2016), while audiences prefer to check on Facebook for information about the programs that they watch, Twitter is their preferred option to find out the opinions of other users.

The products shown on television and the information published on social media complement each other (García-Avilés, 2012). Viewer comments provide quick and direct feedback, enabling showrunners to make the appropriate changes to the project (Harrington et al., 2013; James, 2017), and retweets are highly relevant to the dissemination and credibility of television content (Lin & Peña, 2013).

The personal profiles of showrunners are often accessible on Twitter (Marwick & boyd, 2010). Thanks to their presence, recognition and popularity on this social network, they are sometimes crucial to the public image of the fiction series, even becoming considered as celebrities (Phalen, 2018). As a result, these professionals use their accounts as a forum to build an author brand, using the design of their profile on the social network and applying certain techniques to show content and elements to followers in the messages they publish, thus strategically developing their connections with the audience of the projects that they produce (Higueras-Ruiz et al., 2019; Navar-Gill, 2018).

Objectives and methodology

The main objective of this study is to determine the strategies used by showrunners of American fiction series produced by Netflix in their interaction and communication with viewers on Twitter. To that end, we have quantitatively and qualitatively examined which: 1) techniques; 2) type of content; and 3) audiovisual and textual elements are included in the tweets and retweets posted by showrunners to connect with their audience, both in relation to the account of the fiction series and to the Netflix platform.

The study sample is formed by the official profiles -with the verified account badge- of showrunners of American live-action fiction television series on Twitter, which have been produced or co-produced by the Netflix streaming platform, are part of its library and include the label “A Netflix Original Series”. The final sample was limited, for the purpose of current relevance, to showrunners of series whose first or subsequent seasons were released between June 1st, 2018 and June 30th, 2019.

Given that audience engagement and interaction on social networks is particularly relevant during the promotional period prior to the broadcast of the television project (Gallego, 2013), field work and the specific monitoring time necessary to quantify the tweets and retweets of each profile, as well as their examination, was limited to the four weeks prior to the release of the full season of the series on the platform.

The American market was selected due to the greater recognition of the showrunner figure in this industry, pioneer in the adoption of new platforms (Ojer & Capapé, 2013); the variants introduced in the production of fiction series, as a result of the popularity and specific characteristics of the Netflix service and its original content (Jenner, 2014); and the important connection between American television and Twitter (Segado et al., 2015).

Finally, taking into account the prior contributions by Lin and Peña (2013), Buschow et al. (2014), Quintas-Froufe and González-Neira (2014, 2016), Fernández-Gómez and Martín-Quevedo (2018), and Navar-Gill (2017), the results obtained from the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Twitter profiles and tweets monitored are presented in a series of tables, prepared independently in relation to the objectives and revision elements proposed.

After applying the established selection criteria: 1. Name of the Netflix fiction series; 2. Season premiere; 3. Release date; 4. Showrunner/s; and 5. Official Twitter account, the study sample of showrunner profiles on Twitter is composed of 25 verified accounts, although we examined 26 results due to the release of two seasons of the same series during the defined period.5

Firstly, a descriptive approximation was carried out with regards to the numeric and visual data of the profiles analyzed. Next, answers were sought to the three research questions, through the manual counting and textual analysis of the tweets posted:

Q1. Which techniques are used in the tweets and retweets posted by the showrunners included in the sample in relation to the fiction series and to the Netflix platform? Tweets including the hashtag, mentions or retweets to the official account of the television series produced by each showrunner were counted, as well as those to the official Netflix account in the United States.

Q2. What type of content is used in the tweets posted by the showrunners included in the sample? The published messages were analyzed and classified according to six content categories, selected in accordance with the theoretical review: information/promotion, participation, appeal/help, questions, appreciation, and other subjects.

Q3. Which audiovisual and textual elements are used in the tweets posted by the showrunners included in the sample? The inclusion of hashtags, emoticons, photographs, videos, gifs and links used in the tweets was taken into account.

The results obtained respond to the questions related to the theoretical basis presented above. They also make it possible to determine the possibilities on Twitter for creators of fiction series to build a brand image that contributes to the assignment of authorship, and to their critical and cultural recognition by audiences.

Analysis and results

For the description of the profiles included in the sample, we observed both the numerical data: 1. Date of creation of the profile; 2. Number of tweets (TW); 3. Number of followed (FD); 4. Number of followers (FO); and 5. Number of Likes (LK); as well as the descriptive data on the means used to connect with the fiction series: 1. Images of the series in the profile photograph (PRO); 2. Images of the series in the header photograph (HDR); 3. References to the position of the showrunner in the biography (BIO).

After observing the profiles, it can be noted that activity varies significantly, as shown by the number of followers -from 2.19 million to 2 436- and tweets posted -from 40 900 to 14-. There are also differences in the relationship between the account interface with the television series. In 68% of the cases reference is made to the series in the biography and, to a lesser extent (36%), it appears in the header photograph. By contrast, the majority of the showrunners (88%) show no connection to the fiction television series through their profile photograph.

It can be noted that in no case does the date of creation of the account coincide with the promotion period prior to the release of the audiovisual project, but rather between two to eleven years before this date, contributing to the personal nature of the account.

Techniques used in the tweets and retweets posted by the showrunners

The tweets (TW) and retweets (RT) posted during the established time period were quantified and classified according to the techniques employed: with regards to the television product (1. Percentage of tweets using the official hashtag of the television series (HSG); 2. Percentage of tweets mentioning the official account of the television series (MEN); 3. Percentage of retweets originating from the official account of the television series (RT); and with regards to the Netflix platform in the United States; (4. Percentage of tweets using the official hashtag of the United States Netflix platform (HSG); 5. Percentage of tweets mentioning the official account of Netflix United States (MEN); 6. Percentage of retweets originating from the official account of Netflix United States (RT).

Table 1 General characteristics of the sample of showrunner profiles on Twitter (June 30th, 2019) 

Showrunner Twitter Date of
creation
Numerical data Descriptive data
TW FD FO LK PRO HDR BIO
Cheo Hodari Coker @cheo_coker 04/2016 3 555 3197 20.3 k 2 580
Patrick Somerville @patrickerville 08/2010 4 303 938 3 145 1 129
Mike Flanagan @flanaganfilm 01/2011 3 491 458 40.6 k 3 076
Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa @WriterRAS 07/2015 1 003 63 213 k 2 492
Joel Hodgson @JoelGHodgson 08/2013 3 439 1 225 67.8 k 7 599
Brad Peyton @bradpeyton 07/2012 673 25 3 840 50
Jeff Franklin @fullhouseguy 05/2011 511 22 26.1 k 34
Brad Wright @bradtravelers 04/2016 1 529 471 10.2 k 6 349
Leslye Headland @LeslyeHeadland 08/2013 3 740 948 9480 10.4 k
Gloria Calderón Kellett @everythingloria 08/2008 10.8 k 812 44 k 46.6 k
Steve Blackman @SteveBlackmanTV 08/2010 857 321 5 796 33
Mitchell Hurwitz @MitchHurwitz 08/2010 352 577 91.9 k 33
Brit Marling @britmarling 03/2009 652 187 106 k 80
Lauren Iungerich @laurenei 03/2009 2 114 102 7 322 3 375
Jarrad Paul @JarradPaul 06/2009 909 436 24.2 k 548
Ryan O’Connell @ryanoconn 08/2010 506 525 42.8 k 4 681
David H. Steinberg @DavidHSteinberg 01/2012 5 855 532 4 201 5 052
Rightor Doylea @RightorDoyle 01/2014 14 208 2 436 2 709
Liz Feldman @thelizfeldman 01/2009 6 170 809 28.3 k 51.6 k
Ildy Modrovich @Ildymojo 12/2014 1 936 175 47.1 k 16.5 k
Joe Henderson @Henderson_Joe 11/2008 11.9 k 1 135 32.9 k 13 k
Ava DuVernay @ava 06/2008 40.9 k 12.8 k 2.19 M 153 k
Lauren Morelli @lomorelli 01/2011 1 944 357 38.7 k 1 750
Neal Baer @NealBaer 04/2009 5 252 191 12.1 k 2 914
Kevin Hench @KevinHench 12/2011 800 472 6 114 1 916

a The account belonging to Rightor Doyle was active at the time of conducting the study, but his profile cannot currently be viewed on Twitter.

Source: The authors.

The results show varied activity in the posting of tweets and retweets, and in the connection between the account of the television series and the Netflix platform in the United States. Despite the fact that 50% of the profiles reach the sum of 28 tweets and retweets in total, an average of one tweet or retweet per day, there are showrunners whose use of the social network is limited.

Over half of the accounts (61.53%) include the hashtag of the television series on at least one occasion, but only two profiles use it in more than half of their tweets -@Ildymojo (81.21%) and @SteveBlackmanTV (63.15%)-.

These figures are even lower in the case of mentions made to the account of the television series: 50% of the profiles mention it at least once, but none do so in half of their tweets. Retweets are also used at least once by 50% of the showrunners, but to a significantly limited extent.

The data suggest very little interaction with the account of Netflix United States: at least on one occasion 23.07% of the profiles use the hashtag, 45.30% mention the account and 3.84% share its content.

Types of content included in the tweets posted by the showrunners

The tweets posted during the time period were classified according to the following content categories, which are not mutually exclusive: 1. Information/promotion; 2. Participation; 3. Appeal/help; 4. Questions; 5. Appreciation; and 6. Other subjects.

The results show that the showrunners post tweets with very similar types of content. On over half of the profiles (57.69%), at least half of the tweets fall within the category of information/promotion related to the television series: links to the trailer, countdown to the release date, photographs of the production process and reviews and news from other media. The model of tweet posted the day prior to the project›s premiere is particularly noteworthy:

Table 2 Techniques used in the tweets and retweets posted by the showrunners in twitter in relation to the fiction series and to the US Netflix platform 

Twitter Time Total TV Series Netflix Us
TW RT HSG MEN RT HSG MEN RT
@cheo_coker 25/05/18 - 22/06/18 50 68 - - 2.9 - - -
@patrickerville 24/08/18 - 21/09/18 5 4 - - - - - -
@flanaganfilm 14/09/18 - 12/10/18 41 8 - 4.8 12.5 - 2.4 -
@WriterRAS 28/09/18 - 26/10/18 76 1 27.6 2.6 - 21.0 1.3 -
@JoelGHodgson 25/10/18 - 22/11/18 11 1 9.0 - - - 9.0 -
@bradpeyton 26/10/18 - 23/11/18 18 - 11.1 - - - 16.6 -
@fullhouseguy 16/11/18 - 14/12/18 2 - - - - - - -
@bradtravelers 16/11/18 - 14/12/18 14 20 42.8 21.4 - - 42.8 -
@LeslyeHeadland 04/01/19 - 01/02/19 32 20 - 3.1 15.0 - 6.2 -
@everythingloria 11/01/19 - 08/02/19 174 37 0.5 16.0 10.8 - 1.1 2.7
@SteveBlackmanTV 18/01/19 - 15/02/19 19 4 63.1 15.7 25.0 42.1 36.8 -
@MitchHurwitz 15/02/19 - 15/03/19 1 1 - - - - - -
@britmarling 22/02/19 - 22/03/19 6 1 16.6 33.3 100 - - -
@laurenei 01/03/19 - 29/03/19 3 5 33.3 33.3 40.0 - - -
@WriterRAS 08/03/19 - 05/04/19 35 - 45.7 - - 2.8 - -
@JarradPaul 15/03/19 - 12/04/19 6 4 16.6 16.6 75.0 16.6 - -
@ryanoconn 15/03/19 - 12/04/19 18 24 - - - - - -
@DavidHSteinberg 18/03/19 - 15/04/19 62 94 45.1 - - 6.4 -
@RightorDoyle 27/03/19 - 24/04/19 4 4 25.0 - 50.0 - - -
@thelizfeldman 05/04/19 - 03/05/19 7 14 - 14.2 14.2 - 14.2 -
@Ildymojo 10/04/19 - 08/05/19 64 - 81.2 1.5 - - - -
@Henderson_Joe 10/04/19 - 08/05/19 67 129 20.8 - 7.4 - - -
@ava 03/05/19 - 31/05/19 176 261 29.5 1.1 - 0.5 2.8 -
@lomorelli 10/05/19 - 07/06/19 7 4 - - 25.0 - - -
@NealBaer 10/05/19 - 07/06/19 12 21 41.6 25.0 33.3 66.6 - -
@KevinHench 24/05/19 - 21/06/19 3 - - - - - - -

Source: The authors.

Table 3 Types of content included in the tweets posted by the showrunners in Twitter 

Twitter Content Categories
1 2 3 4 5 6
@cheo_coker 54.0 - - - 2.0 46.0
@patrickerville - - - - - 100
@flanaganfilm 82.9 2.4 - - - 17.0
@WriterRAS 30.2 1.3 - - - 68.4
@JoelGHodgson 63.6 27.2 - - 18.1 18.1
@bradpeyton 33.3 - - - 5.5 55.5
@fullhouseguy 50.0 - - - - 50.0
@bradtravelers 50.0 - 14.2 7.1 14.2 28.5
@LeslyeHeadland 3.1 3.1 6.2 6.1 3.1 78.1
@everythingloria 18.3 4.5 1.1 4.5 8.6 67.2
@SteveBlackmanTV 73.6 10.5 - - 10.5 21.0
@MitchHurwitz - - - - - 100
@britmarling 66.6 - - - - 33.3
@laurenei 66.6 - - - - 33.3
@WriterRAS 40.0 2.8 - 11.4 - 54.2
@JarradPaul 66.6 - - - - 33.3
@ryanoconn 33.3 16.6 - 5.5 5.5 61.1
@DavidHSteinberg 58.0 4.8 1.6 - 12.9 35.4
@RightorDoyle 50.0 - - - 50.0 -
@thelizfeldman 57.1 - - - 28.5 42.8
@Ildymojo 67.1 1.56 3.1 7.8 10.9 17.1
@Henderson_Joe 22.3 2.9 - 1.4 1.4 76.1
@ava 32.9 - 0.5 1.1 10.2 57.3
@lomorelli 28.5 - - - 14.2 57.1
@NealBaer 66.6 41.6 - 8.3 - 25.0
@KevinHench 66.6 - - - - 33.3

Source: The authors.

One more pic to celebrate the #CAOS drop that’s happening tonight at midnight on #Netflix. Kiernan and Chance, on the VERY first day of filming! It was the spider scene!! Now they’re all grown up, but back then, they look liked babies! Love them so much! #Sabrina (Aguirre-Sacasa, 2018).

It is also worth noting the importance of tweets related to other subjects: 46.15% of the accounts publish such content in at least 50% of their tweets. Such tweets include support for other audiovisual projects, news on sports or politics and social, ideological or cultural opinions that, in certain cases, have a connection to the television series:

America was never great. There was always someone at the bottom. Someone being oppressed, enslaved, interned, caged, deported. How did those people survive? Family bonds. Both genetic family + community as family. That’s what #QUEENSUGAR is about. Our family is back June 12 (DuVernay, 2019).

Tweets of appreciation are used at least once by 57.69% of the profiles. These messages are addressed both to the public and to all the professionals involved in producing the series:

A year ago, we were cancelled. Today, #LuciferSeason4 is on Netflix!! These episodes are for you, Lucifans. Thanks for fighting so damn hard so that we could make them. #Lucifer (Henderson, 2019).

We found very little data with regards to categories of content related to the audience, such as participation, appeal/help and questions, which did not exceed 50% of tweets on any of the accounts. Nevertheless, we did find important examples of messages calling for participation in events and promotional activities:

Next up 5808 Sunset Blvd. free @OneDayAtATime food truck!! Come out & let us feed you & give you high fives!!” (Calderón Kellett, 2019).

Tweets calling for the help of viewers to disseminate the television series:

#Travelers drops this Friday Dec 14th! So, if you like season 3, tell the world! Good reviews and ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes can help us a lot. (And if you don’t like it, well, please keep that to yourself;) @ TRVLRSseries @netflix @EricMcCormack @Carrie_Mudd (Wright, 2018).

Tweets including questions to stimulate the audience:

Are you seeing doublesdoubles? Then you must be watching Ep. 119 of #Sabrinanetflix. Will the prophecy be fulfilled?? #CAOS (Aguirre-Sacasa, 2019).

Audiovisual and textual elements included in the tweets posted by the showrunners

We quantified the number of tweets posted during the time period using the following audiovisual and textual elements, which are not mutually exclusive: 1. Hashtags; 2. Emoticons; 3. Photographs; 4. Videos; 5. Gifs; and 6. Links.

The data obtained suggest a significant preference for the use of external links: 30.76% of the accounts include them in all of the tweets posted, and 92.30% in at least half of them. The links connect the tweets to the websites of audiovisual communication media, or to the social networks of the showrunners themselves.

The use of different hashtags can be observed, particularly that of the television series or different versions thereof, depending on the season promoted. In total, 26.92% of the accounts use hashtags in at least half of their tweets, and 73.07% use them on at least one occasion.

A limited use of emoticons can be found: they are used at least once by 46.15% of the profiles, and they are usually related to the story in the fiction series. Some of the showrunners also publish photographs: promotional posters of the project and images of the production process and related events. They are used in at least one tweet by 46.15% of the accounts.

Table 4 Audiovisual and textual elements included in the tweets posted by the showrunners in Twitter 

Twitter Audiovisual and textual elements
1 2 3 4 5 6
@cheo_coker 2.0 - - - - 68.0
@patrickerville - - 20.0 - - 80.0
@flanaganfilm - - 2.4 - - 92.6
@WriterRAS 88.1 93.4 78.9 3.9 - 3.9
@JoelGHodgson 9.0 - 36.3 - - 54.5
@bradpeyton 61.1 33.3 - - - 100
@fullhouseguy - - - - 100 100
@bradtravelers 7.1 - - - - 42.8
@LeslyeHeadland 3.1 18.7 12.5 3.1 3.1 37.5
@everythingloria 7.4 22.9 11.4 - - 36.2
@SteveBlackmanTV 15.7 - - - - 100
@MitchHurwitz - - - - - 100
@britmarling 16.6 16.6 - - - 100
@laurenei 33.3 - - - - 33.3
@WriterRAS 100 85.7 88.5 5.7 - 2.8
@JarradPaul 16.6 - 16.6 - - 50.0
@ryanoconn - - - - - 61.1
@DavidHSteinberg 50.0 3.2 12.9 1.6 1.6 53.2
@RightorDoyle 50.0 50.0 - - - 100
@thelizfeldman 14.2 - - - - 100
@Ildymojo 87.5 45.3 28.1 - - 67.1
@Henderson_Joe 31.3 7.4 10.4 - - 67.1
@ava 38.0 19.8 17.0 3.4 3.9 69.8
@lomorelli - 42.8 - - - 85.7
@NealBaer 75.0 - - - - 100
@KevinHench - - - - - 66.6

Source: The authors.

By contrast, the use of videos and gifs is limited: only 19.23% of the showrunners included in the sample and 15.38%, respectively, use these elements on at least one occasion.

Discussion and conclusions

Firstly, it can be observed that the very limited Twitter use of certain showrunners within the sample prevents us from generalizing the communicative and promotional potential of this tool as established in the theoretical review (Segado et al., 2015). Despite the fact that our selection is representative of the Twitter use of showrunners of original Netflix series, it has proven to be too limited to make broader statements on the matter.

The data obtained were heterogeneous, ranging from accounts with very little information to others that were significantly more active, taking advantage of the benefits arising from developments in the television industry to interact with the audience, promote the fiction series and create and strengthen their author brand image beyond their commercial aspirations. Twitter provides a series of strategies to help the audience to identify with the showrunner figure. Through their profile interface, these professionals can represent their connection to the fiction series, especially in their biography, enabling followers to understand the leadership of the showrunner in the television production, thus reinforcing their authorship of the work.

In the results related to the techniques, content and elements used, based on the lack of a visible pattern in the tweets posted, the personal nature of some content and the limited activity of certain profiles, it can be deduced that they are not managed by a community manager, contributing to the consideration of the social network as a tool to build the personal image of showrunners.

Despite the aforementioned differences in strategies and activities, based on the data obtained it can be concluded that showrunners have a preference for the use of hashtags, especially that of the television series; informative and promotional tweets, particularly in the week prior to the project’s premiere; and the inclusion of external links to expand on the information contained in the message.

These results are similar to the engagement strategy used on Twitter by the profile of Netflix Spain (Fernández-Gómez & Martín-Quevedo, 2018), and by the profiles of the Spanish television programs Código Emprende, La Voz and Top Chef (Quintas-Froufe & González-Neira, 2014). The data collected from both studies coincide in the benefits of varied tweets and the use of audiovisual elements, which can also be observed in this investigation.

However, in the conclusions drawn by Navar-Gill (2017) on the activity of the Twitter accounts of the writers’ rooms of Jane the Virgin, Faking It and Orange Is the New Black, greater interaction with the audience was observed compared to the results of our analysis. The reason for the difference found in the aforementioned work, in which the author notes that the use of the account of the series’ writers’ room is more important than that of the showrunner’s personal profile, is so as not to undermine the authority of this figure in relations between the media and the audience (Navar-Gill, 2017, p. 418).

Furthermore, with regards to building a personal brand through the activity of showrunners on Twitter, it can be noted that this brand is in line with the image of the actual network or platform, and with the television project. In this case, it can be observed that the tweets are more closely connected to the account of the fiction series than to that of Netflix United States, showing a limited use of the hashtag or corresponding mention. Nevertheless, the content of the tweets analyzed allows us to observe the showrunner’s connection with the marketing and brand image strategies that are characteristic of this platform, given that these professionals share the events and promotional material published by Netflix through their profiles.

Finally, it can be noted that there is a possibility to compare the data obtained with the viewing figures of television series, to assess the existence of a direct connection between the behavior of showrunners on Twitter and consumption of the television product. In this case, this proposal would be limited due to the lack of explicit information on the audience of all the showrunner’s projects on Netflix. However, there is a possibility to further expand on this study in the future by applying the model to a different sample of showrunner profiles, to compare and complement the results obtained.

REFERENCES

Aguirre-Sacasa, R. [@ WriterRas]. (25 de octubre 2018). One more pic to celebrate the #CAOS drop that’s happening tonight at midnight on #Netflix. Kiernan and Chance, on the [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/2rq9g89Links ]

Aguirre-Sacasa, R. [@WriterRas]. (5 de abril 2019). Are you seeing doublesdoubles? Then you must be watching Ep. 119 of #Sabrinanetflix. Will the prophecy be fulfilled?? #CAOS [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/2qC6qgjLinks ]

Buschow, C., Schneider, B. & Ueberheide, S. (2014). Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV. Communications. The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0009 [ Links ]

Calderón Kellett, G. [@everythingloria]. (8 de febrero de 2019). Next up 5808 Sunset Blvd. free @OneDayAtATime food truck!! Come out & let us feed you & give you high [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/2DdP0sSLinks ]

Carrillo-Bernal, J. (2018). Paradigma Netflix. El entretenimiento de algoritmo. Editorial UOC. [ Links ]

Cascajosa-Virino, C. (2016). El ascenso de los “showrunners”: Creación y prestigio crítico en la televisión contemporánea. Index Comunicación, 6(2), 23-40. https://bit.ly/2vKauxwLinks ]

Cascajosa-Virino, C. (2018). Las series de televisión españolas ante la llegada de los servicios VOD (2015-2017). El Profesional de la Información, 27(6),1303-1312. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.13 [ Links ]

Castro-Mariño, D. (2016). La audiencia social y el mundo narrativo de la ficción: Análisis de los comentarios de los fans y community managers sobre la ficción televisiva y webseries españolas. Palabra Clave, 21(1), 86-110. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.1.5 [ Links ]

Cornelio-Marí, E. M. (2020). Melodrama mexicano en la era de Netflix: algoritmos para la proximidad cultural. Comunicación y Sociedad, e7481, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2020.7481 [ Links ]

Deller, R. (2011). Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 8(1), 216-245. http://bit.ly/33d4QPKLinks ]

DuVernay, A. [@ava]. (22 de mayo de 2019). America was never great. There was always someone at the bottom. Someone being oppressed, enslaved, interned, caged, deported. How did [Video attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/37DZlwbLinks ]

Fernández-Gómez, E. & Martín-Quevedo, J. (2018). La estrategia de engagement de Netflix España en Twitter. El Profesional de la Información, 27(6), 1292-1302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.12 [ Links ]

Fernández-Manzano, E. P., Neira, E. & Clares-Gavilán, J. (2016). Gestión de datos en el negocio audiovisual: Netflix como estudio de caso. El Profesional de la Información, 25(4), 568-576. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.06 [ Links ]

Gallego, F. (2013). Social TV analytics: Nuevas métricas para una nueva forma de ver televisión. Index Comunicación, 3(1), 13-39. http://bit.ly/2JJ76H4Links ]

García-Avilés, J. A. (2012). Roles of audience participation in multiplatform television: From fans and consumers, to collaborators and activists. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 9(2), 429-447. http://bit.ly/2NcICYRLinks ]

Guerrero, E., Diego, P. & Kimber, D. (2017). Hooked on lit screens. El Profesional de la Información, 26(6), 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.nov.10 [ Links ]

Guo, M. (2019). Social television viewing with second screen platforms: Antecedents and consequences. Media and Communication, 7(1), 139-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1745 [ Links ]

Halpern, D., Quintas-Froufe, N. & Fernández-Medina, F. (2016). Interacciones entre la televisión y su audiencia social: Hacia una conceptualización comunicacional. El Profesional de la Información, 25(3), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.06 [ Links ]

Harrington, S., Highfield, T. & Bruns, A. (2013). More than a backchannel: Twitter and Television. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10(1), 405-409. http://bit.ly/2JGz46gLinks ]

Hederson, J. [@Henderson_Joe]. (8 de mayo de 2019). A year ago, we were cancelled. Today, #LuciferSeason4 is on Netflix!! These episodes are for you, Lucifans. Thanks for fighting [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/2DjSIRGLinks ]

Higueras-Ruiz, M. J., Gómez-Pérez, F. J. & Alberich-Pascual, J. (2018). Historical review and contemporary characterization of showrunner as professional profile in TV series production: traits, skills, competences, and style. Communication & Society, 31(1), 91-105. http://bit.ly/326nPtVLinks ]

Higueras-Ruiz, M. J., Gómez-Pérez, F. J. & Alberich-Pascual, J. (2019). Revisión histórica y conceptual de la autoría y sus implicaciones en el medio televisivo: el concepto de autor en las series de televisión contemporáneas estadounidenses. Doxa Comunicación, (28), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n28a04 [ Links ]

Izquierdo-Castillo, J. (2015). El nuevo negocio mediático liderado por Netflix: Estudio del modelo y proyección en el mercado español. El Profesional de la Información, 24(6), 819-826. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.14 [ Links ]

James, S. E. (2017). Early organization, commercialization and weaponization of social media in the entertainment industry: A case study, Bones, season 6 (2010-2011). Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1313927 [ Links ]

Jenner, M. (2014). Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching. New Media & Society, 18(2), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541523 [ Links ]

Kemp, S. (2019). Digital 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates. We are Social. http://bit.ly/2NarTp1Links ]

Lacalle-Zalduendo, C. & Gómez-Morales, B. (2017). La recepción televisiva española en la era multipantalla. Comunicación y Sociedad, (30), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i30.6135 [ Links ]

Latorre-Martínez, P., Orive-Serrano, V. & Íñiguez-Dieste, D. (2018). Medición y análisis de la audiencia social de las televisiones autonómicas en Facebook y Twitter. El Profesional de la Información, 27(5), 1061-1070. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.10 [ Links ]

Lin, J. S. & Peña, J. (2013). Are you following me? A content analysis of TV networks’ brand communication on Twitter. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2011.10722188 [ Links ]

Lotz, A. D. (2016). The paradigmatic evolution of U.S. television and the emergence of internet-distributed television. Icono 14, 14(2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v14i2.993 [ Links ]

Marwick, A. E. & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [ Links ]

Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6(1), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1353/jeu.2014.0002 [ Links ]

McNutt, M. (2018). Social TV fandom and the media industries. Transformative Works and Cultures, 26, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2018.1504 [ Links ]

Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV. The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York University Press. [ Links ]

Navar-Gill, A. (2017). From strategic retweets to group hangs: Writers’ room Twitter accounts and the productive ecosystem of TV social media fans. Television & New Media, 19(5), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417728376 [ Links ]

Navar-Gill, A. (2018). The fan/creator alliance: Social media, audience mandates, and the rebalancing of power in studio-showrunner disputes. Media Industries Journal, 5(2), 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mij.15031809.0005.202 [ Links ]

Newman, M. Z. & Levine, E. (2012). Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status. Routledge. [ Links ]

Ojer, T. & Capapé, E. (2013). Netflix: A business model in the distribution of audiovisual content. Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(9), 575-584. http://bit.ly/2pzBi0fLinks ]

Pearson, R. (2010). Fandom in the digital era. Popular Communication, 8(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405700903502346 [ Links ]

Phalen, P. F. (2018). Writing Hollywood. The work and professional culture of television writers. Routledge. [ Links ]

Quintas-Froufe, N. & González-Neira, A. (2014). Audiencias activas: Participación de la audiencia social en la televisión. Comunicar, 22(43), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-08 [ Links ]

Quintas-Froufe, N. & González-Neira, A. (2016). Consumo televisivo y su medición en España: Camino hacia las audiencias híbridas. El Profesional de la Información, 25(3), 376-383. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.07 [ Links ]

Rincón, O. (2011). Nuevas narrativas televisivas: Relajar, entretener, contar, ciudadanizar, experimentar. Comunicar, 18(36), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.3916/C36-2011-02-04 [ Links ]

Scolari, C. A. & Establés, M. J. (2017). El ministerio transmedia: Expansiones narrativas y culturas participativas. Palabra Clave, 20(4), 1008-1041. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.4.7 [ Links ]

Segado, F., Grandío, M. M. & Fernández-Gómez, E. (2015). Social media and television: A bibliographic review on the Web of Science. El Profesional de la Información, 24(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.may.02 [ Links ]

Simons, N. (2014). Audience reception of cross-and transmedia TV drama in the age of convergence. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1120-1139. http://bit.ly/2N8vIe5Links ]

Van-Esler, M. (2016). Not yet the post-TV era: Network and MVPD adaptation to emergent distribution technologies. Media and Communication, 4(3), 131-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i3.548 [ Links ]

Wayne, M. L. (2018). Netflix, Amazon, and branded television content in subscription video on-demand portals. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 725-741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717736118 [ Links ]

Wright, B. [@bradtravelers]. (12 de diciembre de 2018). #Travelers drops this Friday Dec 14th! So, if you like season 3, tell the world! Good reviews and ratings on [Tweet]. Twitter. http://bit.ly/2ruyMJ6Links ]

How to cite:

Higueras-Ruiz, M. J. & Alberich-Pascual, J. (2021). Netflix TV fiction series showrunners’ interaction and communication strategies on Twitter. Comunicación y Sociedad, e7772. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2021.7772

1This article has been written during the pre-doctoral contract: “Formación de Profesorado Universitario” (FPU 15/00737) of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport of the Government of Spain. Project National Plan “Transmedialización y crowdsourcing en las narrativas de ficción y no ficción audiovisuales, periodísticas, dramáticas y literarias”, (2018-2020) (Ref. CSO2017-85965-P) Domingo Sánchez-Mesa Martínez and Jordi Alberich-Pascual (2018-2020).

4Not all projects that bear this seal are produced or co-produced by Netflix (Wayne, 2018). This work includes those that do present this characteristic and that are released for the first time in full seasons on the platform.

5Table Annex 1: Presentation of the criteria and selection of the sample of showrunner profiles on Twitter. https://bit.ly/2OGQGoa

Received: April 02, 2020; Accepted: October 27, 2020; Published: March 17, 2021

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons