Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
nova página do texto(beta)
Espanhol (pdf)
Artigo em XML
Referências do artigo
Tradução automática
Enviar este artigo por emailIndicadores
-
Citado por SciELO -
Acessos
Links relacionados
-
Similares em
SciELO
Compartilhar
Permalink
Secuencia
versão On-line ISSN 2395-8464versão impressa ISSN 0186-0348
Secuencia no.62 México Mai./Ago. 2005
https://doi.org/10.18234/secuencia.v0i62.915
Artículos
Deliberación pública, pluralismo agonístico y democracia. Reafirmación de la democracia deliberativa ante la crítica posestructuralista
* Doctor en Ciencias Sociales. Profesor-investigador en el Instituto Mora, México, adscrito al área de Socióloga Política y Económica. Sus temas de interés son la construcción de ciudadanía, la política deliberativa y la rendición de cuentas en las democracias en consolidación.
La deliberación pública pretende sentar una base sólida para el fortalecimiento y la profundización de la democracia. Sin embargo, desde una perspectiva posestructuralista en teoría política, se piensa que esta idea, debido a sus supuestos normativos, es inconveniente para tal propósito. Este artículo discute las perspectivas deliberativas y posestructuralistas en torno a la democracia. Por un lado, se muestra que el enfoque posestructuralista, a pesar de sus aportaciones, carece de una formulación precisa acerca de cómo construir instituciones y prácticas democráticas. Por otra parte, se discuten ciertas aproximaciones deliberativas a la democracia que proporcionan tal formulación. En una de ellas se ilustra la relevancia de la deliberación para entender los procesos de democratización en América Latina.
Palabras clave: Democracia; deliberación pública; antagonismo; pluralismo; agonismo
Public deliberation attempted to establish a solid basis for reinforcing and expanding democracy. However, from a post-structuralist perspective in political theory, it is thought that this idea, due to its normative assumptions, is unsuitable for this purpose. This article discusses the deliberative and post-structuralist perspectives regarding democracy. On the one hand, it shows that, despite its contributions, the post-structuralist approach lacks a precise formulation of how to construct institutions and democratic practices. On the other hand, the article discusses certain deliberative approaches to democracy that provide this formulation. One of them illustrates the importance of deliberation in understanding the processes of democratization in Latin America.
Key words: Democracy; public deliberation; antagonism; pluralism; agonism
Bibliografía
-Avritzer, Leonardo, Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002. [ Links ]
-Bohman, James, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996. [ Links ]
______ (ed.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999. [ Links ]
-Cohen, Joshua, "Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy" en David Estlund (ed.), Democracy: Philosophical Readings, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2002, pp. 87-106. [ Links ]
______, "Democracia y libertad" en Jon Elster (cornp.), La democracia deliberativa, Gedisa, España, 2001, pp. 235-288. [ Links ]
______,"Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy" en Thomas Christiano (ed.), Philosophy and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, pp. 17-38. [ Links ]
-Cohen, Joshua y Joel Rogers, Associations and Democracy, Verso, Londres, 1995. [ Links ]
-Derrida, Jacques, "Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority" en Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld y David Gary Carlson (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, Routledge, Londres y Nueva York, 1992, pp. 3-66. [ Links ]
-Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy, University of New York Press, Nueva York, 1957. [ Links ]
-Dryzek, John, Discursive Democracy: Politics, Police, and Political Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. [ Links ]
______, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000. [ Links ]
-Elster, Jon (ed.), La democracia deliberativa, Gedisa, España, 2001. [ Links ]
______, "The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory" en Thomas Christiano (ed.), Philosophy and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, pp. 138-158. [ Links ]
-Fishkin, James y Peter Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2003. [ Links ]
-Fraser, Nancy, "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy" en Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 109-141. [ Links ]
-Fung, Archon y Eric Olin Wright (eds.), Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, Verso, Londres, 2003. [ Links ]
-Habermas, Jürgen, Teoría de la acción comunicativa, Taurus, España, 1999, 2 vols. [ Links ]
______, "Tres modelos normativos de democracia" en Jurgen Habermas, La inclusión del otro. Estudios de teoría política, Paidós, España, 1999, pp. 231 -246. [ Links ]
______, Facticidad y validez, Trotta, 4a. ed., España, 2001. [ Links ]
-Howarth, David, Aletta J. Norval y Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2000. [ Links ]
-Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies, Yale University Press, New Heaven, 1969. [ Links ]
______, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1991. [ Links ]
-Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. [ Links ]
-Laclau, Ernesto, "New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time" en Ernesto Laclau, New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, Verso, Londres, 1990, pp. 3-85. [ Links ]
______, "Deconstrucción, pragmatismo, hegemonía" en Chantal Mouffe (cornp.), Deconstrucción y pragmatismo, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1998, pp. 97-136 (Espacios del Saber, 4). [ Links ]
______,"Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics" en Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau y Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, Hegemony and Universality, Verso, Londres, 2000, pp. 44-90. [ Links ]
-Laclau, Ernesto y Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, Londres, 1985. [ Links ]
-Lefort, Claude, Democracy and Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988. [ Links ]
-Linz, Juan y Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996. [ Links ]
-Metapolítica, vol. 4, abril-junio de 2000. [ Links ]
-Mouffe, Chantal, "Democratic Citizenshipand the Political Communtiy" en Chantal Mouffe (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy, Verso, Londres, 1992, pp. 225-239. [ Links ]
______, El retorno de lo político, Paidós, Barcelona, 1999 (Estado y Sociedad, 69). [ Links ]
______,The Democratic Paradox, Verso, Londres, 2000. [ Links ]
-Norval, Aletta J., "Democratic Decisions and the Question of Universality: Rethinking Recent Approaches", Essex Papers in Politics and Government, Department of Government/University of Essex, núm. 151, 2000, Colchester. [ Links ]
______,"The Impurity of Politics: Deconstructive Interventions", Essex Papers in Politics and Government. SubSeries in ldeology and Discourse Analysis, Department of Government/ University of Essex, núm. 18, 2002, Colchester. [ Links ]
-O'Donnell, Guillermo, y Phillip Schmitter (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1986, vol. II. [ Links ]
-Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, Nueva York, 1996. [ Links ]
-Sartori, Giovanni, The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, 1987. [ Links ]
-Schmitt, Carl, El concepto de lo político, Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1998. [ Links ]
-Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, University of New York, Nueva York, 1947. [ Links ]
-Young, Iris Marion, Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000. [ Links ]
Recibido: Febrero de 2004; Aprobado: Noviembre de 2004
Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons
