SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49Efectos de la irradiación y el nitrato sobre la fotosíntesis en el pasto marino Cymodocea nodosaPrimera aproximación del periodo de crecimiento y desove de Symphodus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces: Labridae) en el sureste del mar Negro índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencias marinas

versión impresa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.49  Ensenada ene./dic. 2023  Epub 08-Dic-2023

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.y2023.3332 

Articles

Natural spawning of the leopard grouper (Mycteroperca rosacea) in captivity in La Paz, Mexico

Vicente Gracia-López1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2922-9736

Minerva Concepción Maldonado-García1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-6531

Marcos Fabián Quiñones-Arreola1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-8355

Jorge León Sandoval-Soto1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-395X

Francisco Javier Encarnación-Ramírez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-0881

Ana Gabriela Trasviña-Moreno1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0660-4185

Gerardo Arturo García-González1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-9683

1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, 23090 La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.


Abstract

Natural spawning of the leopard grouper (Mycteroperca rosacea) was studied in captivity from 2004 to 2008 under natural photoperiod conditions. Fish spawned naturally in 2006, but only 90,000 unfertilized eggs were collected. A total of 43 and 27 spawning days were observed in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Spawning season began in March and lasted until May-June and was related to an increase in water temperature from 21.1 to 23.8 °C. The mean (SE) number of eggs released each day was 101,705 (13,876) in 2007 and 40,510 (7,874) in 2008, and the total number of eggs collected in 2007 and 2008 was 4.37 × 106and 1.07 × 106, respectively. The number of eggs collected per month was not significantly different within each year (P> 0.05), although a significant difference was observed between 2007 and 2008 (P< 0.05). The annual relative number of eggs released was 288,750 eggs·kg-1in 2007 and 72,919 eggs·kg-1in 2008, and viable egg production was 184,800 eggs kg-1in 2007 and 25,375 eggs kg-1in 2008. The fertilization rate (%) of the eggs collected daily differed significantly throughout the spawning season of 2007 (P< 0.05). The fertilization rate also differed (P< 0.05) between 2007 (61.10%) and 2008 (32.30%). Statistical analysis of the 2 consecutive spawning seasons indicated no correlation between the fertilization rate and fecundity. The effect of the moon phase on spawning was also considered. The fish spawned at dusk before total darkness. Mean (SD) egg diameter was 864.0 ± 22.0 µm.

Key words: rosacea; natural spawning; grouper; production; photoperiod

Resumen

Se estudió el desove natural de la cabrilla sardinera,Mycteroperca rosacea, en cautiverio, de 2004 a 2008 en condiciones naturales de luz y temperatura. Los peces desovaron naturalmente en 2006, pero solo se recolectaron 90,000 huevos no fertilizados. Se observó un total de 43 días de desove en 2007 y 27 días en 2008. La temporada de desove comenzó en marzo y se prolongó hasta mayo-junio, lo cual se relacionó con un aumento en la temperatura del agua de 21.1 a 23.8 °C. La media (error estándar) del número de huevos liberados diariamente fue de 101,705 (13,876) en 2007 y 40,510 (7,874) en 2008, y el número total de huevos recolectados fue de 4.37 × 106y 1.07 × 106, respectivamente. El número de huevos recolectados por mes no fue significativamente diferente dentro de cada año (P> 0.05), pero sí al comparar 2007 y 2008 (P< 0.05). La puesta relativa anual fue de 288,750 huevos·kg-1en 2007 y 72,919 huevos·kg-1en 2008, y la producción de huevos viables fue de 184,800 huevos·kg-1en 2007 y 25,375 huevos·kg-1en 2008. La tasa de fertilización (%) de los huevos recolectados diariamente fue significativamente diferente a lo largo de la temporada de desove de 2007 (P< 0.05). La tasa de fertilización también difirió significativamente (P< 0.05) entre 2007 (61.10%) y 2008 (32.30%). El análisis estadístico indicó que no hubo correlación entre la tasa de fertilización y el número de huevos liberados en ambas temporadas de desove. El efecto de la luna sobre el desove también se analiza en el documento. Durante todo el estudio, los peces desovaron al anochecer antes de la oscuridad total. El diámetro medio (± desviación estándar) del huevo fue de 864.0 ± 22.0 µm.

Palabras clave: rosacea; puestas naturales; mero; producción; fotoperiodo

Introduction

The leopard grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets 1877), is a member of the Epinephelidae family. The distribution of this species spans the Gulf of California to the western Pacific coast of Mexico. Adult leopard groupers form spawning aggregations from April to June in the Gulf of California (Erisman et al. 2007), which increases their vulnerability to fishing pressure (Sala et al. 2004). As of 2018, the leopard grouper has been listed as a species of “Least Concern” on the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (Erisman and Craig 2018). Due to the quality of its meat, the leopard grouper is a highly valued resource with a high market price, with reported landings of 200-400 t per year (González-Cuellar et al. 2019). Prior to 2000, information on this species was scarce and primarily related to biological aspects such as feeding habits (Peláez-Mendoza 1997). Since then, various studies of leopard grouper reproduction in the wild have been conducted.

In this study, we were able to verify the information that has been generated to date regarding leopard grouper reproduction. The leopard grouper does indeed form large aggregations and spawns for long periods; however, leopard groupers also aggregate outside of the spawning season, and the lunar cycle and spawning do not appear to be synchronized (Erisman et al. 2007). Leopard groupers are gonochoric (Erisman et al. 2008), and this species shows group-synchronous ovarian development(Estrada-Godinez et al. 2011). In the wild, leopard groupers have been observed to spawn from May to June (Estrada-Godinez et al. 2011), March to May (Sala et al. 2003) or April to June (Erisman et al. 2007). In addition, differences in bioindicators and biochemical variables have also been observed throughout the reproductive cycle of this species (Estrada-Godinez et al. 2014).

In recent years, the leopard grouper has been the subject of multiple studies conducted under captive conditions. For example, induced spawning of wild-caught fish was conducted by administering 2 injections of 1,000 and 500 IU·kg-1of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Gracia-López et al. 2004a). In another induction study with hCG and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRHa), better results were obtained with females that were induced with hCG (Kiewek-Martínez et al. 2010). Additionally, improvements in larval and juvenile culture have resulted in the production of thousands of juveniles (Gracia-López et al. 2005). The reproductive physiology of captive leopard groupers has also been studied, specifically the roles of sex steroids (estradiol, testosterone, and 11 keto-testosterone) in the reproductive cycle (Maldonado-García et al. 2018).

At the same time, great efforts have been made to increase our current understanding of the different culture phases for this species. For example, Gracia-López et al. (2004a) reported improved hatching rates at temperatures ranging from 24.0 to 30.0 °C and improved yolk sac volume from 26.0 to 28.0 °C. In addition, higher temperatures and the salinity value of 32 resulted in the best larval growth and hatching rates (Gracia-López et al. 2004a). Larvae and juvenile production has also been achieved with fertilization, hatching, and survival rates of 76.8%, 71.2%, and 1.38%, respectively (Gracia-López et al. 2005, Martínez-Lagos and Gracia-López 2009). However, despite these advances, low larval survival at the first feeding remains problematic, which has led to studies of enzymology, probiotics, and disease (Reyes-Becerril et al. 2008, 2011; Martínez-Lagos et al. 2014).

In grouper aquaculture, major limitations have led to inadequate larval survival and inconsistent egg production (Okumura et al. 2002). Capturing fingerlings to be raised in captivity is not an optimal production strategy due to the scarcity of these source organisms (Kungvankij et al. 1986, Lim 1993). As such, reproduction has been studied in a large number of species in captivity with the aim of obtaining eggs. Lee and Yang (2002) and several studies have identified causes that prevent captive females from completing oocyte maturation (Zohar and Mylonas 2001). In most cultured marine fish species, it is sometimes necessary to manipulate abiotic factors, such as the photoperiod or temperature (Carrillo et al. 1989, Zanuy et al. 1995), or rely on exogenous hormone treatments to stimulate final oocyte maturation and ovulation (Mylonas and Zohar 2001).

One successful means to improve fecundity, fertilization, and egg production is related to natural spawning, with the broodstock being maintained in appropriately sized tanks with optimum water conditions and nutritional requirements. This method has been successfully implemented with various grouper species (Toledo et al. 1993, James et al. 1997, Ranjan et al. 2017) and appears to be a logistically feasible means to obtain good quality eggs in adequate quantities (Mylonas et al. 2004, Jerez et al. 2006).

In spite of the results that have been achieved in previous studies with hormonal induction, much remains to be understood about leopard grouper reproduction in captivity. To this end, a long-term study was conducted to evaluate leopard grouper maturation and natural spawning in captivity. This study evaluated egg production and fertilization over multiple spawning seasons and determined which factors may influence reproduction.

Materials and Methods

Broodstock and husbandry

In May 2004, the broodstock used in this study (n= 17) were captured by hook and line in the northern area of San José Island, Baja California Sur (Mexico), and transported to the facilities of the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR) in cylindrical tanks (500 L) with supplemental oxygenation. In the laboratory, the fish were anaesthetized with 50 mg·L-1of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222), weighed, and dorsally tagged with Spaghetti FloyTags (Floy Tags & Mfg.; Seattle, WA, USA) for subsequent identification.

The fish were stocked in an outdoor circular tank (7 m3, 1 m depth) at a density of 1.40 kg·m-3under natural temperature and photoperiod conditions. The group consisted of 14 females with a mean (SD) weight of 1.17 (0.36) kg and 3 males with a mean (SD) weight of 1.36 (0.15) kg. The fish were fed on alternate days with frozen sardine and mackerel to satiation. From 2004 to 2007, the fish remained outdoors, after which they were transferred to a circular black fiberglass tank (7 m3) in a closed laboratory where they were kept until 2009. Suitable water conditions were maintained by a recirculation system composed of settler, filter, UV lamp, and chiller equipment. With this system, physicochemical parameters, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, CO2, ammonium nitrogen, nitrites, and nitrates, were controlled. Supplemental oxygenation was provided via blower aeration.

Temperature was continuously measured by submersible HOBO TidbiT temperature loggers (Onset; Bourne, MA, USA); salinity was measured using a refractometer (ATAGO; Bellevue, WA, USA), and oxygen was measured with a YSI 85 oximeter (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). The mean water temperature during the spawning period was 22.9 (1.2) °C and ranged between 21.1 and 23.8 °C. The annual water temperature and photoperiod are shown in Figure 1. Salinity was 37 and dissolved oxygen ranged from 5.3 to 6.2 mg·L-1.

Figure 1.  Photoperiod (solid line) and temperature recorded in the tanks where the leopard groupers were maintained in 2007 (dashed line) and 2008 (dotted line). Shaded area corresponds to the spawning season. 

Maturity

Individuals were weighed and sampled to determine the maturation stage and sex in February, July, September, and November 2007 and January 2008. Sperm samples were taken by applying gentle abdominal pressure. Sperm were collected in Eppendorf tubes for subsequent motility observations. Gonad samples were obtained from females by introducing a polyethylene cannula into the oviduct. To determine oocyte diameter and maturation stage, photographs of the samples were taken with a Coolsnap-Pro Color camera (Media Cybernetics; Rockville, MD, USA) installed on a Bx-41 microscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus (v.5.0, Media Cybernetics).

Egg collection and analysis

After spawning, buoyant eggs were passed through the outlet pipe to the collector tank, where they were retained by a mesh net (300 µm). On each spawning day, the eggs were collected in the morning, washed with sterile sea water, and transferred to a tank (35 L) with aeration to estimate the number of eggs released and fertilization rate (%). In this study, the fertilization rate represents the eggs obtained on a spawning day and does not represent the fertilization of a particular female. The total number of eggs was estimated by counting the eggs in 20 samples (15 ml). Mean (SD) egg diameter was measured with Sigma Scan Pro 5.0 (Systat Software; Chicago, IL, USA). The eggs were examined under the microscope to monitor embryonic development, and the fertilization rate was calculated following the early stages of embryonic development. The eggs were individually placed in 96-well microtiter plates (in replicates), with one egg per well, and maintained at 23.0 ± 1.2 °C.

The fertilization rate was evaluated daily and was calculated as the number of fertilized eggs/total number of buoyant eggs. The number of viable eggs was calculated by multiplying the total number of eggs by the fertilization rate. In terms of egg production, the annual relative number of eggs released (eggs·kg-1) and viable egg production (eggs·kg-1) were calculated taking into account the total mass of females (kg) in the tank. The time of day when spawning occurred was determined when the first egg was collected in the collector tank.

Statistical analysis

Monthly and annual differences in the number of eggs released and the fertilization rate for the 2 spawning seasons were analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA,P< 0.05). The effect of the moon on fecundity was determined through a one-way ANOVA, after recording the number of eggs by moon phase and month. Significance was determined with Statistica v.8.0 (StatSoft; Tulsa, OK, USA). We modeled the expected fertilization rate using the generalized linear model logit link function in R v.4.1.2 (RStudio Team 2020) as a function of the spawning date and the number of eggs released per day. We used residual deviance to assess the goodness-of-fit and the chi-square test to evaluate the validity of the model.

Lunar phases were assigned as follows: 0 to the full moon and values up to 29 for each successive date. Days were grouped into 8 lunar phases adapted by Grant et al. (2009) from Stolov (1965) and Bell and Defouw (1966). A circular histogram was plotted with bar length representing the cumulative number of eggs released (×106), the dashed lines and dots representing the spawning frequency, and the color representing the fertilization rate according to lunar phase. Data were analyzed for possible correlations with the lunar phase using Rao’s spacing test. In this case, significance was determined withP< 0.1 (Grant et al. 2009).

This study was conducted following the Guidelines of the European Union Council (2010/63/EU) and Mexican Government (NOM‐062-ZOO‐1999) for the production, care, and use of experimental animals. Experimental protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by the aquaculture committee of CIBNOR. The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journalCiencias Marinas, as noted in the author guidelines, have been followed, and approval was awarded by the appropriate ethical review committee.

Results

Spawning season

In 2006, 22 months after the start of the study, a batch of 90,000 unfertilized eggs was obtained, representing the only spawn of that year. No fertile eggs were collected until 2007. In that year, the first and last batches of eggs were collected on 9 March and 29 June, respectively. In 2008, the first spawning date was 12 March, and the spawning season ended on 21 May. The spawning seasons took place during periods in which temperatures increased (21.1 to 23.8 °C in 2007 and 21.2 to 23.6° C in 2008) as the photoperiod increased (Fig. 1). Throughout the duration of this experiment, the first fertilized eggs were collected just before total darkness, between sunset and night, when it was impossible to see any signs of courtship. Egg diameter ranged from 848.0 to 884.0 µm with a mean (SD) of 864.0 ± 22.0 µm.

Maturation

Fish sampled in February 2007 showed evidence of maturity, albeit with males and females in different stages of maturity. Eleven days after this sampling, the first spawning of the year was observed. Oocyte size (mean ± SD) ranged from 107 ± 42 to 554 ± 103 µm. In July 2007, only the males were mature (flowing males); 4 females exhibited vitellogenic oocytes, and 10 females showed previtellogenic oocytes. In September and November 2007, no signs of maturity were observed in any individual. In January 2008, 3 females exhibited hydrated oocytes, although males were not mature at this point.

Egg production

There were 43 and 27 spawning days in 2007 and 2008, respectively, with a similar number of spawning days (9 to 13 days) and eggs obtained each month, except in March 2008, when only 5 spawning days were recorded because the spawning season began in the middle of that month. The monthly and annual mean (SE) number of eggs per spawning day and mean (SE) fertilization rate obtained in 2007 and 2008 are shown in Table 1. Large variation in daily egg release was observed, with 18,560 to 471,000 eggs released per day in 2007 (mean [SE]: 101,705 [13,876]) and 800 to 145,000 eggs released per day in 2008 (mean [SE]: 40,510 [7,874]) (Fig. 2). No consistent trend was recorded throughout the spawning season. In all, 4.37 × 106and 1.07 × 106eggs were released in 2007 and 2008, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 2). The annual relative number of eggs released was 288,750 eggs·kg-1and 72,919 eggs·kg-1in 2007 and 2008, respectively, while viable egg production was 184,800 and 25,375 eggs·kg-1in 2007 and 2008, respectively.

Table 1.  Number of spawning days and eggs obtained per month. Mean (SE) eggs per release and fertilization rate (F) per month obtained in 2007 and 2008. 

Year Month Spawning days Eggs Eggs/release (×103) F(%)
2007
March 11 1,045,667 95.0 (54.8)a 16.8 (20.0)a
April 13 886,111 68.2 (28.6)a 76.7 (24.0)b
May 10 1,139,828 114.0 (132.0)a 80.6 (16.3)b
June 9 1,301,692 144.6 (121.0)a 71.0 (28.0)b
2008
March 5 194,870 38.9 (40.8)a 23.1 (38.5)a
April 12 428,373 35.7 (35.5)a 30.3 (33.1)a
May 10 470,537 47.0 (46.8)a 39.2 (34.6)a
Total 2007 43 4,373,298 101.7 (91.0)x 61.1 (34.2)x
Total 2008 27 1,093,780 40.5 (40.9)y 32.3 (33.8)y

Means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P< 0.05).

Figure 2.  Eggs released each day in 2007 (black bars) and 2008 (grey bars) and the fertility rate in 2007 (black spots) and 2008 (grey spots) based on leopard grouper natural spawning. The relationship between the number of eggs released and spawning date in 2007 (black dashed line) and for the combined values of 2007 and 2008 (red dashed line) is shown based on the generalized linear models logit link function. 

Figure 3.  Leopard grouper eggs accumulated during the spawning season of 2007 and 2008) in captivity. 

Table 2.  Cumulative spawning parameters during 2 consecutive leopard grouper spawning seasons (2007 and 2008). 

2007 Mean (SE) 2008 Mean (SE)
Eggs released daily (×103eggs) 101.70 (13.9)a 40.50 (7.8)b
Total eggs released (×106eggs) 4.37 1.07
Annual relative number of eggs released (103eggs·kg-1) 288.00 73.00
Fertilization (%) 61.10 (5.2)a 32.30 (6.5)b
Viable egg production (103eggs·kg-1) 184.80 25.30

Statistically significant differences between the 2 years were present in the parameters examined (P< 0.05).

Statistical Analysis

The number of eggs collected per spawning day ranged from 68,200 (April) to 144,600 (June) in 2007 and 38,900 (March) to 47,000 (May) in 2008. There were no statistically significant differences within each year (P> 0.05; Table 1), although significant differences were found between 2007 and 2008 (P< 0.05). A low fertilization rate was recorded at the start of the spawning season that gradually increased, with significant differences between months in 2007 (P< 0.05). The fertilization rate exhibited higher daily variations in 2007 than in 2008, and significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between those 2 years, with the fertilization rate decreasing from 61.1% in 2007 to 32.3% in 2008.

For 2007, a significant interaction between the fertilization rate and spawning date was detected, but no relationship was present between the fertilization rate and daily egg release (Fig. 2). The same significant interaction between fertilization rate and spawning date was detected for the combined data of 2007 and 2008. The expectation did not deviate from zero. Also, most residuals exhibited absolute values smaller than 2. There appeared to be no influential data points, and only 3 outliers without influence. The chi-square test for residual deviance returned aPvalue of 0.99 for both models, so we can conclude that the model fits well. For 2008, no relationship was observed between factors.

The spawning frequency was significantly different according to the moon phase. More spawning days (9 days) were observed during the full moon phase compared to the waning gibbous (4 days), waning crescent (3 days), or first quarter (2 days) phases. Moreover, the number of eggs released was significantly higher during the full moon (1,067,696 eggs) and waning gibbous (742,876 eggs) phases and significantly lower during the first quarter (107,222 eggs) phase when compared to those of the other moon phases (371,540 to 637,046 eggs). No significant difference was observed in the fertilization rate. Nonetheless, a tendency toward greater fertilization from waxing gibbous to third quarter phases can be observed in Figure 4.

Figure 4.  Fecundity (cumulative number of eggs ×106), spawning frequency (number of spawning days), and fertilization rate of leopard grouper natural spawning according to moon phase. FM: full moon; WnG: waning gibbous; 3Q: third quarter; WnC: waning crescent; NM: new moon; WxC: waxing crescent; 1Q: first quarter; WxG: waxing gibbous. 

Discussion

Conditions for natural spawning in captivity

The acclimatization of organisms to captive conditions, maturation, and successful natural spawning are influenced by a large number of biological, physicochemical, and environmental factors. For example, farmed fish can exhibit reproductive problems if their environmental conditions are suboptimal (Mustafa et al. 2015). As such, maintaining individuals of different species under appropriate temperature and tank conditions with proper feeding and care can encourage spontaneous reproduction in captivity. Our results have shown that the recirculating system employed with the tanks (7 m3) used in this study was efficient and produced desirable conditions for leopard grouper maturation and natural breeding. Moreover, the feeding and photoperiod regimes and oxygen, salinity, and temperature conditions properly maintained the wild-caught broodstock and allowed for reproduction with spontaneous spawning to develop in this species. Spontaneous spawning has also been reported in a large number of fish species including the amberjack,Seriola dumerili(Jerez et al. 2006), and the fine sole,Paralichthys adspersus(Ángeles and Mendo 2005). There are also many examples of grouper species in which individuals were maintained in fiberglass tanks, cages, or concrete tanks with recirculation systems (Toledo et al. 1993, James et al. 1997, Jagadis et al. 2006, Mathew 2010, Ranjan et al. 2017).

The diet provided during this study was mainly composed of sardine, mackerel, and squid. This diet is similar to those observed in natural feeding studies of wildM. rosaceapopulations with organisms of the same size as those in the present study (Peláez-Mendoza 1997, Pérez Rojo 2016). The diet was sufficient for maintaining healthy broodstock and achieving maturation and spawning. However, more studies are needed to develop artificial diets that improve the quality and number of spawns. Grouper nutrition has not been adequately studied, although its importance to reproductive organisms, the quality of eggs and larvae, and fecundity is understood (Luo et al. 2005). During a natural spawning study withEpinephelus tauvina, broodstock were fed a variety of trash fish, cephalopods, vitamins E and B12, and other nutritional supplements to provide eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (Mathew 2010).

The acclimatization time and maturation in captive fishes depend on a variety of factors, which include facility conditions, management, nutrition, and aspects related to the biology of the species. Marine fishes likeSolea solea(Ofelio et al. 2020) andS. dumerli(Jerez et al. 2006) can take 2 and 6 years to mature in captivity, respectively. Groupers have been described as species that can mature and naturally spawn in captivity after a post-capture acclimatization period, which has been found to be relatively short inEpinephelus suillus(Toledo et al. 1993),Epinephelus polyphekadion(James et al. 1997), andEpinephelus merra(Jagadis et al. 2006).

Reproductive cycle, spawning season, and the influence of temperature, photoperiod, and moon phase

In the wild, leopard groupers have been observed to spawn from May to June (Estrada-Godinez et al. 2011), March to May (Sala et al. 2003), or April to June (Erisman et al. 2007). Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) observed temperatures ranging from 21 to 25 °C and approximately 13 h of daylight in the spawning season. The differences reported between spawning seasons could be due to differences in temperature or other variables between study sites. Indeed, Sala et al. (2003) suggested that latitudinal differences in the Gulf of California, which are related to water temperature, could result in differences in leopard grouper spawning periods. In both the wild and captivity, the reproductive cycle of the leopard grouper exhibits differences in reproductive phases throughout the year (Erisman et al. 2008, Estrada-Godinez et al. 2011). A period of rest occurs from August until the oocytes begin to develop in November (Kiewek-Martínez et al. 2010). This is followed by a maturation period of 4 months, which begins as the daylight hours and temperature begin to progressively increase.

In the present study, final maturation in females and full maturation in males was observed in February 2007 and January 2008 through oocyte analyses. Based on the collected eggs, the spawning began in March and carried through until May-June. We noted that the onset of the spawning season occurred as the photoperiod increased, which may be what triggers gonadic maturity after the winter solstice. However, additional follow-up studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Indeed, few studies have been conducted on photoperiod and temperature in groupers despite these variables being highly important to the reproductive process (Rimmer and Glamuzina 2019). Kanemaru et al. (2012) observed gonadal maturity inE. merraafter induction with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and a long photoperiod. The influence of temperature on maturation and spawning remains largely unknown, although temperature alone was insufficient to control gonadal development inEpinephelus fuscoguttatus(Rimmer and Glamuzina 2019).

The spawning and daily egg release frequencies were significantly different according to moon phases, although no significant difference was observed in the fertilization rate after analyzing 70 spawning days throughout the spawning season. It should be noted that these results are based on the effect of the moon on a group of fish and are not the result of observations of individual fish. The lunar rhythm has been found to influence the natural spawning ofE. merra(Jagadis et al. 2006) andE. tauvina(Mathew 2010) in captivity. In another study, the relationship between spawning and the lunar cycle was found to decrease throughout the experimental period (Ranjan et al. 2017).

Egg production

Groupers generally acclimatize well to confinement and can reproduce spontaneously under these conditions (Tucker 1994). The efficiency of egg production per animal was very clear, which supports natural reproduction as an important component of leopard grouper reproduction, especially when considering the additional associated benefits such as lower personnel, facility, and energy costs and less animal handling. In 2007 and 2008, the total number of eggs released during the spawning season was 4.3 × 106and 1.0 × 106, respectively. In addition, natural spawning also resulted in successful egg production.

In previous studies, a total of 47.00 × 106eggs were collected in a study withEpinephelus coioides(Ranjan et al. 2017), while 9.20 × 106eggs were collected withE. tauvina(Mathew 2010), and more than 17.00 × 106eggs were collected withE. polyphekadion(James et al. 1997). Great differences in egg production are apparent among these studies, as they focused on different species, individual sizes, confinement conditions, feeding methods, and facility conditions. In this study, differences were present between 2007 and 2008, including significant differences in the number of eggs collected and their fertilization rates. These differences may be the result of the fish being moved to a closed laboratory in 2007 after the spawning season. Nonetheless, the reasons for these differences are not clear given that physicochemical parameters, feeding, and handling were similar in both years.

It is difficult to compare the results of the present study to those of studies that have employed hormonal induction. In this study, the results were obtained from a group of fish and did not come from the data of individuals. However, the collective results of all studies on this topic elucidate the improvements that have been made with natural spawning when compared to those of hormonal induction. The fecundity and fertilization rates obtained after hormonal induction with hCG and LHRHa inM. rosaceaare highly variable and range from 3 × 103to 571 × 103eggs per spawning (Kiewek-Martínez et al. 2010), which resulted in the production of 3.70 × 106viable eggs with 97 females and a low fertilization rate. In general, studies of leopard grouper reproduction have made the benefits of natural reproduction apparent given that natural reproduction yields higher egg production with a smaller number of specimens than does hormonal induction.

Estimated egg production was 288 × 103and 73 × 103eggs·kg-1in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Interspecific variation in fecundity has been observed with other species that show higher fecundity than the leopard grouper. For example, annual relative fecundity values greater than 400,000 eggs·kg−1and between 2.80 to 4.90 × 106eggs·kg−1were observed with the red porgy (Pagrus pagrus; Mylonas et al. 2004) and sharpsnout sea bream (Diplodus puntazzo; Papadaki et al. 2008), respectively.

Number of spawning events

Leopard grouper females show group-synchronous ovarian development (Maldonado-García et al. 2018). Group synchronous fish have ovaries with different types of oocytes at the same time. These fish may ovulate once or over many days or weeks during a reproductive cycle. In the present study, 43 and 27 spawning days were observed in 2007 and 2008, respectively, and the number of spawning days per month remained relatively constant (9-13 spawning days per month) except in March 2008. In this month, the leopard groupers began to spawn on 12 March, which resulted in only 5 spawning events in that month.

In general, grouper species that reproduce naturally in captivity spawn several times a month during several months of the year. Natural spawning has been observed in almost all months during 2 consecutive years (Mathew 2010). During the spawning season, the spawning frequency has been observed to increase from 5 to 13 spawns per month (Ranjan et al. 2017). In addition, multiple spawning events were observed between August and October in 2004, with the number of eggs per spawning event ranging from 22,000 to 180,000 (Jagadis et al. 2006). Finally, groupers that had spawned only a few times for 3 consecutive years were able to continuously spawn 2-3 times a month over 4 months after changes to the nutrition of the broodstock were implemented (James et al. 1997). A future research goal should be to incorporate wild-caught reproductive organisms into captive breeding programs to take advantage of their genetic makeup to avoid inbreeding, which can negatively impact subsequent generations (Bright et al. 2016, Superio et al. 2021).

Time of spawning

The lack of light at the time of courtship and spawning did not allow for direct observations of these 2 actions. However, direct observations throughout the duration of this experiment allowed us to confirm that the first fertilized eggs obtained in the collector appeared just before total darkness between sunset and night. Erisman et al. (2007) studied the spawning behavior of the leopard grouper in the wild and indicated that spawning occurred in the late afternoon a few hours before sunset. Spawning as dark approaches is a regular behavior that has been frequently observed in other species, like the brown grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), which was found to spawn one hour before and half an hour after sunset around the new moon period (Zabala et al. 1997). This spawning behavior has also been observed with the Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus; Whaylen et al. 2004). Spawning amongst 10 to 17 fish was observed in the evening a few days after the full moon (Rowell et al. 2019). Natural spawning in captivity has often been observed during the afternoon, at sunset, and overnight (Jagadis et al. 2006, Mathew 2010, Ranjan et al. 2017), but it can also occur in the morning (James et al. 1997).

Size of fertilized oocytes

The mean ± SD egg diameter from natural spawning was 864.0 ± 22.0 µm (848.0 to 884.0 µm). Similar egg diameters have been found via hormonal induction, namely 859.0 ± 18.0 μm (Gracia-López et al. 2005), 860.0 ± 30.0 μm and 880.0 ± 20.0 μm (Gracia-López et al. 2004a), and 872.0 ± 15.0 μm (Gracia-López et al. 2004b).Epinephelus merraeggs were found to be spherical and buoyant with diameters ranging from 710.0 to 730.0 μm (Jagadis et al. 2006). The fertilized eggs ofE. coioideswere round and measured about 857.7 μm (Fourooghifard et al. 2017). InE. polyphekadion, egg diameter was 757.3 ± 37.4 μm (James et al. 1997). It is important to mention that the resulting egg diameter was higher in eggs that were naturally spawned than in those obtained with hormonal induction (Papanikos et al. 2003).

In conclusion, with our methodology, we can ensure constant egg production in captivity with wild-caught fish that are maintained for approximately 2 years without manipulating the parameters that commonly affect fish reproduction. Leopard groupers spawn during 3-4 months and can produce 184 × 103viable eggs·kg-1. The spawning season in this study (March to May-June) was related to increases in temperature and the photoperiod, although further studies are needed to confirm the effects of these variables on leopard grouper reproduction. Lastly, the moon phase affected fecundity throughout the spawning season.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Comisión Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura (CONAPESCA) and jointly by Secretaría de Educación Pública and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (SEP-CONACYT). The authors thank Francisco Nieto for coordinating the project on behalf of CONAPESCA, Vanessa Díaz for English language editing, and Alexia Omont for statistical support. All co-authors declare they have no competing interests. Data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author

References

Angeles B, Mendo J. 2005. Crecimiento, fecundidad y diferenciación sexual del lenguadoParalichthys adspersus(Steindechner) de la costa central del Perú. Ecología aplicada. 4(1-2):105-112. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v4i1-2.304 [ Links ]

Bell B, Defouw RJ. 1966. Dependence of the lunar modulation of geomagnetic activity on the celestial latitude of the moon. J Geophys Res. 71:951-957. [ Links ]

Bright D, Reynolds A, Nguyen NH, Knuckey R, Knibb W, Elizur A. 2016. A study into parental assignment of the communal spawning protogynous hermaphrodite, giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus). Aquaculture. 459:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.013 [ Links ]

Carrillo M, Bromage N, Zanuy S, Serrano R, Prat F. 1989. The effects of modifications in photoperiod on spawning time ovarian development and egg quality in the sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture. 81(3-4):351-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90159-2 [ Links ]

Erisman BE, Buckhorn ML, Hastings PA. 2007. Spawning patterns in the leopard grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea, in comparison with other aggregating groupers. Mar Biol. 151:1849-1861.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0623-2 [ Links ]

Erisman B, Craig MT. 2018. Mycteroperca rosacea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T14053A100466656. [place unknown]: International Union for Conservation of Nature; [accessed 2021 February 09]. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T14053A100466656.en. [ Links ]

Erisman BE, Rosales-Casián JA, Hasting PA. 2008. Evidence of gonochorism in a grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea, from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Environ Biol Fish. 82:23-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9246-1 [ Links ]

Estrada-Godinez JA, Maldonado-García M, Gracia-López V, Carrillo M. 2011. Reproductive cycle of the leopard grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets) and evidence of hermaphroditism = Ciclo reproductive de la cabrilla sardineraMycteroperca rosaceaen la bahía de La Paz, México. Cienc Mar. 37(4):425-441. [ Links ]

Estrada-Godínez JA, Maldonado-García M, Gracia-López V, Carrillo M, Rebollar-Prudente R,Spanopoulos-Zarco M. 2014. Efecto del fotoperiodo y la temperatura sobre la composición bioquímica en Reproductores silvestres de cabrilla sardinera,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets, 1877) = Effect of photoperiod and temperature on the biochemical composition in wild broodstock of sardine cabrilla,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets, 1877). Lat Am J Aquat Res. 42(1):85-96. http://doi.org/10.3856/vol42-issue1-fulltext-6 [ Links ]

Fourooghifard H, Matinfar A, Abdolalian E, Moezzi M, Roohani-Ghadikolaee K, Kamali E, Allen S, Zahedi MR. 2017. Egg production and larval rearing of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) using reared broodstocks in Hormozgan Province, Iran. Iranian J Fish Sci. 16(3):984-992. [ Links ]

González-Cuellar OT, Plomozo-Lugo T, Castro-Moreno P, Weaver AH, Álvarez-Flores CM. 2019. Información de los recursos pesqueros, costa sudoriental de Baja California Sur. La Paz (Baja California Sur, Mexico): Sociedad de Historia Natural Niparajá AC y ProNatura Noroeste AC. 68 p. [ Links ]

Gracia-López V, Kiewek-Martínez M, Maldonado-García M. 2004a. Effects of temperature and salinity on artificially reproduced eggs and larvae of leopard grouperMycteroperca rosacea. Aquaculture . 237(1-4):485-498. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.04.018 [ Links ]

Gracia-López V, Kiewek-Martínez M, Maldonado-García M, Monsalvo-Spencer P, Portillo-Clark G, Civera-Cerecedo R, Linares-Aranda M, Robles-Mungaray M, Mazón-Suástegui JM. 2005. Larvae and juvenile production of the leopard grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets 1877). Aquacult Res. 36(1):110-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01186.x [ Links ]

Gracia-López V, Rodríguez-Romero J, Pérez-Ramírez JM. 2004b. Inducción del desove con HCG y desarrollo embrionario y de larvas de la cabrilla sardinera,Mycteroperca rosacea(Streets, 1877) = Hormone Induced spawning (HCG) and embryonic and larval development of the leopard grouperMycteroperca rosacea(Streets 1877). Cienc Mar . 30(2):279-284. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v30i2.246 [ Links ]

Grant RA, Chadwick EA, Halliday T. 2009. The lunar cycle: a cue for amphibian reproductive phenology?. Anim Behav. 78(2):349-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.007 [ Links ]

Jagadis I, Ignatius B, Kandasami D, Khan MA. 2006. Embryonic and larval development of honeycomb grouperEpinephelus merraBloch. Aquacult Res . 37(11):1140-1145. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01538.x [ Links ]

James CM, Al-Thobaiti SA, Rasem BM, Carlos MH. 1997. Breeding and larval rearing of the camouflage grouperEpinephelus polyphekadion(Bleeker) in the hypersaline waters of the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabi. Aquacult Res . 28(9):671-681. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.1997.00908.x [ Links ]

Jerez S, Samper M, Santamaría FJ, Villamandos JE, Cejas JR, Felipe BC. 2006. Natural spawning of greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili) kept in captivity in the Canary Islands. Aquaculture . 252(2-4):199-207. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.06.031 [ Links ]

Kanemaru T, Nakamura M, Murata R, Kuroki K, Horie H, Uchida K, Senthilkumaran B, Kagawa H. 2012. Induction of sexual maturation of the female honeycomb grouper,Epinephelus merra, in the non-breeding season by modulating environmental factors with GnRH analogue implantation. Aquaculture . 358-359:85-91. http://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.aquaculture.2012.06.026 [ Links ]

Kiewek-Martinez M, Gracia-Lopez V, Carrillo-Estevez M. 2010. Comparison of the effects of HCG and LHRHa on the induction of ovulation of wild and captive leopard grouper,Mycteroperca rosacea. J World Aquacult Soc. 41(5):733-745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2010.00415.x [ Links ]

Kungvankij P, Tiro LB, Pudadera BP, Potestas IO. 1986. Induced spawning and larval rearing of grouper (Epinephelus salmoidesMaxwell). In: Maclean JL, Dizon LB, Hosillos LV (eds.), Proceedings of the First Asian Fisheries Forum., May 26-31, 1986. Manila (Philippines): Asian Fisheries Society. p. 663-666. [ Links ]

Lee WK, Yang SW. 2002. Relationship between ovarian development and serum levels of gonadal steroid hormones, and induction of oocyte maturation and ovulation in the cultured female Korean spotted sea bassLateolabrax maculates(Jeom-nong-eo). Aquaculture . 207(1-2):169-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00728-1 [ Links ]

Lim LC. 1993. Larviculture of the greasy grouperEpinephelus tauvinaF. and the brown-marbled grouperE. fuscoguttatusF. in Singapore. J World Aquacult Soc . 24(2):262-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-7345.1993.TB00015.X [ Links ]

Luo Z, Liu Y, Mai K, Tian L. 2005. Advances in the study on nutrient requirements of grouper (Epinephelussp.): a review. J Ocean Univ China (English Edition). 4:93-98. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-005-0001-y [ Links ]

Maldonado-García M, Gracia-López V, Kiewek-Martínez M, Carrillo M, Zanuy S. 2018. Reproductive cycle of leopard grouperMycteroperca rosacea(Streets, 1877) held in captivity: relationship between gonad development and sex steroid concentration. Lat Am J Aquat Res . 46(1):83-90. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol46-issue1-fulltext-10 [ Links ]

Martínez-Lagos R, Gracia-López V. 2009. Morphological development and growth patterns of the leopard grouperMycteroperca rosaceaduring larval development. Aquacult Res . 41:120-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02313.x [ Links ]

Martínez-Lagos R, Tovar-Ramírez D, Gracia-López V, Lazo JP. 2014. Changes of digestive enzyme activities during larval development of leopard grouper (Mycteroperca rosacea). Fish Physiol Biochem. 40(3):773-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-013-9884-5 [ Links ]

Mathew G. 2010. Spontaneous spawning ofEpinephelus tauvina(Forskal) in captivity. J Mar Biol Ass India. 52(1):14-18. [ Links ]

Mustafa S, Hajini MH, Senoo S, Kian AYS. 2015. Conditioning of broodstock of tiger grouper,Epinephelus fuscoguttatus, in a recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacult Rep. 2:117-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.09.004 [ Links ]

Mylonas CC, Papadaki M, Pavlidis M, Divanach P. 2004. Evaluation of egg production and quality in the Mediterranean red porgy (Pargus pargus) during two consecutive spawning seasons. Aquaculture . 232(1-4):637-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(03)00534-9 [ Links ]

Mylonas CC, Zohar Y. 2001. Use of GnRHa-delivery systems for the control of reproduction in fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 10:463-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012279814708 [ Links ]

Ofelio C, Guarniero I, Cariani A, Viroli C, Bonaldo A, Gatta PP, Parma L. 2020. Monitoring of common soleSolea solea(L) captive broodstock from Northern Adriatic Sea over consecutive spawning seasons. Aquacult Rep . 18(2020):100495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100495 [ Links ]

Okumura S, Okamoto K, Oomori R, Nakazono A. 2002. Spawning behavior and artificial fertilization in captive reared red spotted grouperEpinephelus akaara. Aquaculture . 206(3-4):165-173.http:// doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00722-0 [ Links ]

Papadaki M, Papadopoulou M, Siggelakia I, Mylonas CC. 2008. Egg and sperm production and quality of sharpsnout sea bream (Diplodus puntazzo) in captivity. Aquaculture . 276(1-4):187-197. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.01.033 [ Links ]

Papanikos N, Phelps RP, Williams K, Ferry A, Maus D. 2003. Egg and larval quality of natural and induced spawns of red snapper,Lutjanus campechanus. Fish Physiol Biochem . 28(1-4):487-488. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:FISH.0000030636.08228.4e [ Links ]

Peláez-Mendoza AK. 1997. Hábitos alimenticios de la cabrilla sardineraMycteroperca rosaceaStreets, 1877 (Pisces: Serranidae) en la Bahía de La Paz BCS y zonas adyacentes [BSc thesis]. [La Paz (BCS, Mexico)]: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur (UABCS). 71 p. [ Links ]

Pérez-Rojo MP. 2016. Hábitos alimentarios de la cabrilla sardineraMycteroperca rosacea(Streets, 1877), en Santa Rosalía, BCS, México [MSc thesis]. [La Paz (BCS, Mexico): Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas. 65 p. [ Links ]

Ranjan R, Megarajan S, Xavier B, Dash B, Ghosh S, Menon M, Edward LL. 2017. Conditioning, maturation and year‐round natural spawning of orange‐spotted grouper,Epinephelus coioides(Hamilton, 1822) in recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacult Res . 48(12):5864-5873. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/are.13409Links ]

Reyes-Becerril M, Tovar-Ramírez D, Ascencio-Valle F, Civera-Cerecedo R, Gracia-López V, Barbosa-Solomieu V. 2008. Effects of dietary live yeastDebaryomyces hanseniion the immune and antioxidant system in juvenile leopard grouperMycteroperca rosaceaexposed to stress. Aquaculture . 280(1-4):39-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.03.056 [ Links ]

Reyes-Becerril M, Tovar-Ramírez D, Ascencio-Valle F, Civera-Cerecedo R, Gracia-López V, Barbosa-Solomieu V, Esteban MA. 2011. Effects of dietary supplementation with probiotic live yeastDebaryomyces hanseniion the immune and antioxidant systems of leopard grouperMycteroperca rosaceainfected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult Res . 42(11):1676-1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02762.x [ Links ]

Rimmer MA, Glamuzina B. 2019. A review of grouper (Family Serranidae: Subfamily Epinephelinae) aquaculture from a sustainability science perspective. Rev Aquacult. 11:58-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12226 [ Links ]

Rowell TJ, Aburto-Oropeza O, Cota-Nieto JJ, Steele MA, Erisman BE. 2019. Reproductive behaviour and concurrent sound production of Gulf grouperMycteroperca jordani(Epinephelidae) at a spawning aggregation site. J Fish Biol. 94(2):277-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13888 [ Links ]

RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC; accessed 24 August 2022. http://www.rstudio.com/. [ Links ]

Sala E, Aburto-Oropeza O, Paredes G, Thompson G. 2003. Spawning aggregations and reproductive behavior of reef fishes in the Gulf of California. Bull Mar Sci. 72(1):103-121. [ Links ]

Sala E, Aburto-Oropeza O, Reza M, Paredes G, López-Lemus LG. 2004. Fishing down coastal food webs in the Gulf of California. Fisheries. 29(3):19-25. http://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2004)29[19:FDCFWI]2.0.CO;2 [ Links ]

Stolov HL. 1965. Further investigations of a variation of geomagnetic activity with lunar phase. J Geohys Res. 70:4921-4926. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i019p04921 [ Links ]

Superio J, Fakriadis I, Tsigenopoulos CS, Lancerotto SA, Rodriguez AV, Vervelakis E, Mylonas CC. 2021. Spawning kinetics and parentage contribution of European sea bass (S) broodstocks, and influence of GnRHa-induced spawning. Aquacult Rep . 21:100766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100766 [ Links ]

Toledo JD, Nagai A, Javellana D. 1993. Successive spawning of grouper,Epinephelus suillus(Valenciennes), in a tank and a floating net cage. Aquaculture . 115(3-4):361-367. http://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(93)90149-S [ Links ]

Tucker JW Jr. 1994. Spawning by captive Serranid fishes: a review. J World Aquacult Soc . 25(3):345-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1994.tb00218.x [ Links ]

Whaylen L, Pattengill-Semmens, Semmens BX, Bush PG, Boardman MR. 2004. Observations of a Nassau grouper,Epinephelus striatus, spawning aggregation site in Little Cayman, Cayman Islands, including multi-Species spawning information. Environ Biol Fish . 70:305-313. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EBFI.0000033341.57920.a8 [ Links ]

Zabala M, Garcia-Rubies A, Louisy P, Sala E. 1997. Spawning behaviour of the Mediterranean dusky grouper,Epinephelus marginatus(Lowe, 1834) (Pisces: Serranidae), in the Medes Islands Marine Reserve (NW Mediterranean, Spain). Sci Mar. 61(1):65-77. [ Links ]

Zanuy S, Prat F, Carrillo M, Bromage NR. 1995. Effects of constant photoperiod on spawning and plasma 17β-oestradiol levels of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat Living Resour. 8(2):147-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/alr:1995011 [ Links ]

Zohar Y, Mylonas CC. 2001. Endocrine manipulations of spawning in cultured fish: from hormones to genes. Aquaculture . 197(1-4):99-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00584-1 [ Links ]

Received: December 13, 2021; Accepted: June 18, 2022; Published: May 25, 2023

*Corresponding author. E-mail: vinny@cibnor.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License