SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49Variaciones estacionales en el desempeño reproductivo y larvario de la concha nácar Pteria sterna asociadas con condiciones ambientales anómalasPenaeus vannamei desafiado con una cepa de Vibrio parahaemolyticus NHPA muestra un desequilibrio de la microbiota hepatopancreática índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencias marinas

versión impresa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.49  Ensenada ene./dic. 2023  Epub 08-Dic-2023

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.y2023.3393 

Articles

Mercury concentrations in domestic and imported canned bivalves and cephalopods sold in northwestern Mexico

Jorge Ruelas-Inzunza1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-6650

Carolina Delgado-Alvarez2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-9997

Ofelia Escobar-Sánchez3  4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-0080

Martín Frías-Espericueta4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-1986

1Sección Ambiental, Instituto Tecnológico de Mazatlán, 82070 Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico.

2Universidad Politécnica de Sinaloa, 82199 Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico.

3Dirección de Cátedras, CONACYT, 03940 Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.

4Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, 82000 Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico.


Abstract.

Mercury (Hg) is mainly incorporated into humans through the consumption of contaminated foods. Mercury was measured and the methyl-Hg (MeHg) concentration was estimated in canned mollusks sold in northwestern Mexico to assess the health risk to consumers. Five mollusk types were considered: oysters, clams, octopuses, mussels, and squids. The Hg concentration of mussels was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those of the other bivalves (oysters and clams) and cephalopods (squids and octopuses). The average Hg concentration in bivalves (0.013 mg·kg-1) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of cephalopods (0.018 mg·kg-1). The estimated MeHg concentrations were also lower in bivalves than in cephalopods. Based on our results, no health risk is associated with the consumption of canned mollusks that are sold in northwestern Mexico. The Hg and MeHg concentrations followed the order of octopuses > squids = clams > oysters > mussels. The Hg and MeHg concentrations in the mollusks evaluated in this study were below the maximum permissible limits for human consumption in Mexico.

Key words: methyl-Hg; canned mollusks; eastern Pacific Ocean; health risk; mercury

Resumen.

El mercurio (Hg) se incorpora principalmente en los seres humanos a través del consumo de alimentos contaminados. Se midió el Hg y se estimó el metilmercurio (MeHg) en moluscos enlatados que se venden en el noroeste de México para evaluar el riesgo para la salud de los consumidores. Se consideraron 5 tipos de moluscos: ostiones, almejas, pulpos, mejillones y calamares. La concentración de Hg en los mejillones fue significativamente (P < 0.05) más baja que la de los otros bivalvos (ostras y almejas) y cefalópodos (calamares y pulpos). La concentración promedio de Hg en los bivalvos (0.013 mg·kg-1) fue significativamente (P < 0.05) menor que la de los cefalópodos (0.018 mg·kg-1). Las concentraciones estimadas de MeHg también fueron menores en los bivalvos que en los cefalópodos. De acuerdo con nuestros resultados, no existe riesgo relacionado con el consumo de moluscos enlatados en el noroeste de México. La secuencia de las concentraciones de Hg fue pulpos > calamares = almejas > ostiones > mejillones. Las concentraciones de Hg y MeHg en los moluscos evaluados en este estudio estaban por debajo de los límites máximos permitidos para el consumo humano en México.

Palabras clave: metilmercurio; moluscos procesados; océano Pacífico oriental; riesgo a la salud; mercurio

INTRODUCTION

Mercury is naturally found in very low concentrations in aquatic ecosystems. Natural and anthropogenic sources contribute notable amounts of Hg to these ecosystems, which contaminate the water, sediments, and biota. The main industrial sources of atmospheric Hg, such as impurities in fuels and raw materials, are coal burning, mining, and industrial activities that process ores and other raw materials to produce metals and cement. Other notable sources of Hg stem from the intentional use of this element. The largest of these sources are artisanal and small-scale gold mining activities, followed by the wastes generated from consumer products, including those derived from metal recycling, the chlor-alkali industry, and the production of vinyl-chloride monomers (UNEP 2019).

At elevated concentrations, Hg is dangerous to human health and damages the central nervous system (Davidson et al. 2004). This damage can result in a loss of balance, weakness or difficulty coordinating the muscles used to speak, numbness in extremities, loss of hearing, blurred vision, loss of consciousness, and, in extreme cases, death. Among the organic forms of Hg, methyl-Hg (MeHg) is the most dangerous chemical species (Honda et al. 2006). In most organisms, the main pathway of Hg uptake is ingestion (Luoma and Rainbow 2005), thus the products that are consumed by humans that may contain Hg must be regularly monitored.

Mollusks are a diverse group of organisms that may be consumed either fresh or canned and are highly valued by consumers despite their potential Hg content. As such, it is imperative to monitor the Hg content of fresh and canned mollusks given the potential risk to human health. Indeed, the high market demand for mollusks necessitates special consideration and monitoring efforts for these food items. The most commonly purchased and consumed mollusks are clams, oysters, snails, slugs, octopuses, and squids, although this varies among regions. In Mexico, fresh mollusk consumption is low. For example, the per capita consumption of fresh oysters, squids, octopuses, and clams is less than 1 kg per year (CONAPESCA 2013). Currently, there is no consumption information available for canned shellfish.

To address this lack of much needed information, the content of Hg and MeHg were evaluated in domestic and imported canned mollusks sold in northwestern Mexico. This study assesses the health risk to consumers based on the Hg and MeHg concentrations in mollusks and the average consumption of fishery products in Mexico. In addition, this study compares the Hg concentrations in canned mollusks and fish in northwestern Mexico with those from other regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Canned mollusks were purchased in January 2014 in different supermarkets in Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico. We evaluated 5 types of mollusks in this study: oysters, clams, octopuses, mussels, and squids. The oysters and clams were produced in Mexico, whereas the octopuses, mussels, and squids were imported from the United States of America (USA), South Korea, and Spain, respectively. For each mollusk type, 10 cans were analyzed as individual samples. The cans were opened and drained, and one half of the product in each can was considered a sample.

The duplicate samples were placed in plastic containers, weighed, tagged, and frozen at -20 °C. The laboratory materials and plastic utensils used to store, manipulate, and process the samples were washed and rinsed with distilled water and then acid washed with 2 M HCl and 2 M HNO3, followed by a final rinse with Milli-Q water (MilleporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA; Moody and Lindstrom 1977). The samples were lyophilized (-49 °C and 133 × 10-3 mbar) for 3 days, and then manually ground in an agate mortar. The moisture percentage was determined by the difference in weight between the wet and dry samples. Aliquots (0.25 ± 0.02 g) of dried and homogenized tissues were digested according to the methods of Taylor et al. (2008), with modifications. The samples were placed in Teflon containers with 5 mL of concentrated nitric acid (trace metal grade; JT Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). The samples were allowed to pre-digest for 12 to 18 h at room temperature in an extraction hood, after which they were placed on a hot plate (120 °C) for 3 h and allowed to cool. The digested samples were placed in plastic containers with screw-tops and diluted to 25 mL with Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ cm resistivity).

The Hg content was analyzed by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry (CV-AAS) in a 410 Mercury Analyzer (Buck Scientific, East Norwalk, CN, USA). To evaluate the quality of the analyses, blanks were run with every batch of 20 samples, and a certified reference material (NIST 2976, mussel tissue) was used (98.7 ± 3.1% recovery). The limit of detection of Hg (2 standard deviations of a blank) was 0.002 mg·kg-1.

The MeHg:Hg ratio in mollusks ranges from 38-48% (Hight and Chen 2006). In bivalves, the MeHg:Hg ratio was estimated considering a mean MeHg:Hg ratio of 0.3915, according to the published information of these organisms (Claisse et al. 2001, Pan and Wang 2011, Apeti et al. 2012). The mean MeHg:Hg ratio used for octopuses and squids was 0.81 (Annual et al. 2018) and 0.92 (Miklavčič et al. 2011), respectively. The health risk to consumers was assessed with the hazard quotient (HQ) obtained with the following equation (Newman 2009):

HQ=ERfD (1)

where E is the level of exposure and RfD is the reference dose (Hg: 0.500 µg·kg-1 body weight per day; MeHg: 0.100 µg·kg-1 body weight per day) according to the Environmental Protection Agency (2001). The level of exposure was determined with the following equation:

E=CIW (2)

where C is the concentration (mg·kg-1 wet weight) of Hg or MeHg in the product of interest, I is the rate of ingestion of mollusks per day in Mexico (1.07 grams per person per day; CONAPESCA 2013), and W is the average weight of an adult in Mexico (70.00 kg; Delgado-Álvarez et al. 2015).

The differences in Hg concentrations among the mollusks sampled in this study were evaluated by Kruskall-Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests. The differences in Hg concentrations between bivalves (mussels, oysters, and clams) and cephalopods (squids and octopuses) were assessed by Mann-Whitney tests in GraphPad Prism v. 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) at a confidence level of 95%.

RESULTS

The mean Hg concentrations ranged from 0.020 mg·kg-1 dry weight in octopuses to 0.008 mg·kg-1 dry weight in mussels (Table 1). The average Hg concentrations in mollusks followed the order of octopuses > squids = clams > oysters > mussels. The Hg concentrations in mussels were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those in squids, oysters, clams, and octopuses. Given that bivalves and cephalopods belong to different trophic levels, the Hg concentrations in mussels, oysters, and clams were averaged and compared with the average values of squids and octopuses. The mean Hg concentration of bivalves (0.013 mg·kg-1 dry weight) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of cephalopods (0.018 mg·kg-1 dry weight).

Table 1 Product information and average mercury concentration (Hg; mg·kg-1 dry weight) in mollusk samples. 

Product Brand Origin Presentation n Hg
Mussels A South Korea Smoked mussels in vegetable oil 10 0.008a ± 0.012
Squids B Spain Cooked Dosidicus gigas with tomato, sunflower oil, ink substitute, sugar, and starch 10 0.016b ± 0.002
Oysters C Mexico Smoked oysters in edible oil 10 0.014b ± 0.005
Clams D Mexico Cooked clams in brine 10 0.016b ± 0.028
Octopuses E United States
of America
Cooked octopuses in cottonseed oil 10 0.020b ± 0.027

Different superscript letters indicate significant (P < 0.05) differences.

The mean concentrations of Hg and MeHg (µg·g-1 wet weight) and their corresponding HQ values are presented in Table 2. Hg and MeHg concentrations in the mollusks in this study followed the order of cephalopods (octopuses and squids) > bivalves (mussels, oysters, and clams). The Hg concentrations varied among mollusks, although none of the products contained Hg concentrations that were above the maximum permissible limits for Hg (1.000 mg·kg-1 wet weight) or MeHg (0.500 mg·kg-1 wet weight) established by the Mexican legislation for cephalopods (NOM-129 1993; SSA 1997) and bivalves (NOM-032 1993; SSA 1994). HQ values were below 1.0 for Hg and MeHg, thus the consumption of the canned mollusks evaluated in this study does not carry a health risk. As was observed in the Hg and MeHg concentrations, both HQHg and HQMeHg were higher in cephalopods than in bivalves. Although the potential exposure to Hg and MeHg by consuming canned mollusks is higher in cephalopods than in bivalves, it is unlikely to result in adverse health effects, even for vulnerable groups within the population.

Table 2 Mean mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations (mg·kg-1 wet weight) and corresponding hazard quotient (HQ) values in the canned mollusks evaluated in this study. 

Product Hg HQHg MeHg HQMeHg
Mussels 0.0013 0.00004 0.0005 0.000076
Squids 0.0032 0.00010 0.0026 0.000390
Oysters 0.0022 0.00007 0.0009 0.000140
Clams 0.0026 0.00008 0.0010 0.000150
Octopuses 0.0040 0.00012 0.0037 0.000560

From our results and the studies presented in Table 3, it can be seen that the Hg concentrations were generally low and variable. The highest Hg concentrations (0.140 mg·kg-1 wet weight) were reported in octopuses canned in Portugal, whereas the lowest concentration (0.003 mg·kg-1 wet weight) corresponded to the canned mussels evaluated in our study. The canned mollusks sold in Mexico have Hg concentrations that are not currently of concern; however, information related to other toxic elements, consumption rates, and the co-occurrence of selenium is necessary for precise assessments of consumer health risks.

Table 3 Comparisons of the mercury concentrations (mg·kg-1 wet weight) in the mollusks sold in northwestern Mexico and those of canned mollusks from other areas. 

Species Area of consumption Hg Reference
Bivalves
Mussel Portugal 0.030 Lourenço et al. (2004)
Mussel Venezuela 0.099* Tahán et al. (1995)
Mussel Spain 0.027 Gutiérrez et al. (2006)
Mussel Chile 0.017* De Gregori et al. (1994)
Mussel Chile 0.010* De Gregori et al. (1994)
Mussel India 0.045 Lekshmanan (1988)
Mussel Mexico 0.003 This study
Cockle Venezuela 0.023* Tahán et al. (1995)
Cockle Spain 0.066 Gutiérrez et al. (2006)
Variegated scallop Spain 0.033 Gutiérrez et al. (2006)
Razor shell Spain 0.021 Gutiérrez et al. (2006)
Oyster India 0.070 Lekshmanan (1988)
Oyster Mexico 0.004 This study
Clam Mexico 0.005 This study
Cephalopods
Squid Portugal 0.070 Lourenço et al. (2004)
Squid Mexico 0.005 This study
Octopus Portugal 0.140 Lourenço et al. (2004)
Octopus Mexico 0.007 This study

*Originally reported on the basis of dry weight; conversion to wet weight was conducted considering 67% humidity

Among fishery products, finfish constitute the main source of Hg exposure to humans in tropical and subtropical regions (Costa et al. 2012). To provide additional context for the Hg concentrations in canned bivalves sold in northwestern Mexico, we compared these concentrations to those of canned fish. The Hg concentrations in our study (0.003-0.007 mg·kg-1 wet weight) were 2 orders of magnitude lower than those of canned tuna (Thunnus germo; canned in water: 0.431 mg·kg-1 wet weight, canned in oil: 0.419 mg·kg-1 wet weight) from the USA (Burger and Gochfeld 2004) and Thunnus albacares canned in water (0.362 mg·kg-1 wet weight) from Mexico (Ruelas-Inzunza et al. 2011).

DISCUSSION

Bivalve mollusks have been extensively used as biomonitors of marine pollution because of their sedentary nature and ability to concentrate metals such as Hg. Indeed, more information is available for bivalve mollusks than cephalopods, which may reflect the heightened popularity and accessibility of bivalve products among diverse sectors of the population. In Mexico, detailed information related to the consumption of fishery products is nonexistent (Ruelas-Inzunza et al. 2011). Thus, it is difficult to accurately estimate the health risks associated with the consumption of mollusk products.

The Hg concentrations in this study were similar to those reported by Gutiérrez et al. (2006). Those authors found that mussels exhibited lower Hg concentrations than those of other canned bivalves from Spain, which may have been due to their short life cycles and low trophic positions. In a study that evaluated diverse components of a marine food web in Bohai Bay, China, the trophic positions (determined by stable C and N isotopes) of bivalves ranged from 2.15 in the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) to 2.17 in the short-necked clam (Ruditapes philippinarum), with bivalves occupying lower trophic positions than those of either fish or seabirds (Yi et al. 2005). Notably, fish that occupy elevated trophic positions (e.g., tuna) exhibit elevated Hg concentrations compared to those that occupy lower trophic positions. Similar patterns were found by Blanco et al. (2008) and Olmedo et al. (2013) when comparing Hg concentrations in canned fish and mollusks consumed in Spain. These authors found elevated Hg concentrations in tuna when compared to those of cephalopods or bivalves.

Other authors have reported variable Hg concentrations in various mollusk and fish species. Karimi et al. (2013) found elevated intraspecific variability in Hg concentrations among diverse bivalve species from Long Island, New York. In a study with various canned mollusks from Portugal (Lourenço et al. 2004), the Hg concentrations were higher (0.110 mg·kg-1 wet weight) in cephalopods (squids and octopuses) than in blue mussels (0.030 mg·kg-1 wet weight). Interestingly, in Oman, Al-Mughairi et al. (2013) found that Hg concentrations were not significantly different between cephalopods and bivalves. These authors argued that the high variability in metal concentrations may have been responsible for the lack of differences. In a study with canned tuna in oil matrices, salads, sauces, and pastes, no statistically significant differences were found among presentations, and it was concluded that Hg content was not affected by the packaging medium (Pawlaczyk et al. 2020). High variability in metal content among canned fisheries products makes it difficult to establish patterns of Hg accumulation. This variability may be due to mixing differently sized specimens during canning and the environmental conditions of the sites in which the mollusks and fish were collected.

From the information provided on the labels of fisheries products, we determined that the oysters and clams evaluated in this study were caught and processed in Mexico, whereas the mussels, squids, and octopuses were imported from South Korea, Spain, and the United States, respectively. The origin of fishery products is important in terms of the potential degree of metal accumulation in the collection site. Unfortunately, accurate information on this topic is nonexistent in Mexico. In addition to the origin, other factors that may account for the Hg concentrations in canned mollusks are the pH of the canned products, oxygen concentration in the headspace, storage time, and humidity of the storage location (Oduoza 1992).

The variation in metal concentrations among canned products can also be the result of thermal processing prior to canning. Indeed, cooking has been found to affect the concentrations of metals in seafood. Although Morgan et al. (1997) found that Hg concentrations in raw seafood remained the same after cooking, Torres-Escribano et al. (2010) found that the Hg concentrations increased in cooked seafood due to water loss. Similarly, cooked bivalve mollusk (Lucina pectinata and Anomalocardia brasiliana) samples were found to exhibit significantly higher Hg concentrations than those of raw samples (Costa et al. 2016), which may have been due to the influence of heat on the formation of complexes between Hg chemical species and sulfhydryl groups, such as methylmercury-cysteine, in muscle tissues (Clarkson and Magos 2006).

To compare our results with those of studies that reported their results on the basis of dry and wet weights, we estimated a moisture percentage for our study (67%). This value is similar to those reported by Gutiérrez et al. (2007) for canned variegated scallops (Chlamys varia) of 7 commercial brands sold in Spain (67.34-71.89%). Variations in humidity may be due to the thermal processes used during canning, as Gutiérrez et al. (2007) reported for mussels. Furthermore, McCarron et al. (2008) reported that the moisture content ranged from 79.1-79.2% in fresh mussels (Mytilus edulis) from Ireland, whereas moisture content ranged from 67.4-67.8% in autoclaved specimens. Thus, heat processes may decrease the moisture content, which results in higher elemental concentrations than those of fresh products.

The Hg concentrations in this study varied by an order of magnitude. Nevertheless, the cephalopods commonly used to produce canned goods showed higher Hg concentrations than those of canned bivalves. Thus, Hg concentrations in this study followed the order of octopuses > squids = clams > oysters > mussels. The high variability in Hg concentrations in this study might be related to the conditions of the sites in which the mollusks were collected, the thermal processes used to prepare products, and the practice of mixing differently sized specimens during canning. When comparing our results to those of canned mollusks from different regions, the Hg concentrations were low and variable. Indeed, none of the Hg concentrations in the mollusks were above the maximum permissible limit of 1.0 mg·kg-1 wet weight established by Mexican legislation. When compared to those of canned fish, the Hg concentrations in the mollusks in this study were lower, especially when compared to those of fish occupying high trophic levels.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Ministry of Public Education of Mexico (grant number 7596.20-P). We thank the C. Suárez-Gutiérrez for their valuable support and computing assistance and V. Soto-Zúñiga for their assistance in the laboratory.

REFERENCIAS

Al-Mughairi, S, Yesudhason, P, Al-Busaidi, M, Al-Waili, A, Al-Rahbi, WAK, Al-Mazrooei, N, Al-Habsi, SH. 2013. Concentration and exposure assessment of mercury in commercial fish and other seafood marketed in Oman. J Food Sci. 78(7):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12150 [ Links ]

Annual, ZF, Maher, W, Krikowa, F, Hakim, L, Ahmad, NI, Foster, S. 2018. Mercury and risk assessment from consumption of crustaceans, cephalopods and fish from West Peninsular Malaysia. Microchem J. 140:214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.04.024 [ Links ]

Apeti, DA, Lauenstein, GG, Evans, DW. 2012. Recent status of total mercury and methyl mercury in the coastal waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico using oysters and sediments from NOAA’s mussel watch program. Mar Pollut Bull. 64:2399-2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.006 [ Links ]

Blanco, SL, González, JC, Vieites, JM. 2008. Mercury, cadmium and lead levels in samples of the main traded fish and shellfish species in Galicia, Spain. Food Addit Contam Part B. 1(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210802236893 [ Links ]

Burger, J, Gochfeld, M. 2004. Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation. Environ Res. 96(3):239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2003.12.001 [ Links ]

Claisse, D, Cossa, D, Bretaudeau-Sanjuan, J, Touchard, G, Bombled, B. 2001. Methylmercury in molluscs along the French coast. Mar Pollut Bull. 42(4):329-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00036-4 [ Links ]

Clarkson, TW, Magos, L. 2006. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 36(8):609-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440600845619 [ Links ]

[CONAPESCA] Comisión Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. 2013. Anuario estadístico de acuacultura y pesca 2013. Mexico: CONAPESCA. 298 p. [ Links ]

Costa, FN, Korn MGA, Brito GB, Ferlin S, Fostier AH. 2016. Preliminary results of mercury levels in raw and cooked seafood and their public health impact. Food Chem. 192:837-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.081 [ Links ]

Costa, MF, Landing, WM, Kehrig, HA, Barletta, M, Holmes, CD, Barrocas, PRG, Evers, DC, Buck, DG, Vasconcellos, AC, Hacon, SS, et al. 2012. Mercury in tropical and subtropical coastal environments. Environ Res. 119:88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.07.008 [ Links ]

Davidson, PW, Myers, GJ, Weiss, B. 2004. Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics. 113(3):1023-1029. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.S3.1023 [ Links ]

De Gregori, I, Delgado, D, Pinochet, H, Gras, N, Muñoz, L, Bruhn, C, Navarrete, G. 1994. Cadmium, lead, copper and mercury levels in fresh and canned bivalve mussels Tagelus dombeii (Navajuela) and Semelle solida (Almeja) from the Chilean coast. Sci Tot Environ. 148(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90367-0 [ Links ]

Delgado-Álvarez, CG, Ruelas-Inzunza, J, Osuna-López, JI, Voltolina, D, Frías-Espericueta, MG. 2015. Total mercury content in cultured oysters from NW Mexico: health risk assessment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 94:209-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1430-3 [ Links ]

[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Water quality criterion for the protection of human health: methylmercury. Washington (DC): EPA. 308 p. [ Links ]

Gutiérrez, AJ, González-Weller, D, González, T, Burgos, A, Lozano, G, Reguera, JI, Hardisson, A. 2007. Content of toxic heavy metals (mercury, lead, and cadmium) in canned variegated scallops (Chlamys varia). J Food Prot. 70(12):2911-2915. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.12.2911 [ Links ]

Gutiérrez, AJ, Lozano, G, González, T, Reguera, JI, Hardisson, A. 2006. Mercury content in tinned molluscs (mussel, cockle, variegated scallop, and razor shell) normally consumed in Spain. J Food Prot. 69(9):2237-2240. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-69.9.2237 [ Links ]

Hight, SC, Cheng, J. 2006. Determination of methylmercury and estimation of total mercury in seafood using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS): method development and validation. Anal Chim Acta. 567(2):160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.03.048 [ Links ]

Honda, S, Hylander, L, Sakamoto, M. 2006. Recent advances in evaluation of health effects on mercury with special reference to methylmercury- a minireview. Environ Health Prev Med. 11:171-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02905275 [ Links ]

Karimi, R, Frisk, M, Fisher, NS. 2013. Contrasting food web factor and body size relationships with Hg and Se concentrations in marine biota. PLOS ONE. 8(9):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074695 [ Links ]

Lekshmanan, PT. 1988. Heavy metals in commercially processed molluscan products in relation to quality. CMFRI Bull. 42(2):417-422. [ Links ]

Lourenço, HM, Afonso, C, Martins, MF, Lino, AR, Nunes, ML. 2004. Levels of toxic metals in canned seafood. J Aquat Food Prod Tech. 13(3):117-125. https://doi.org/10.1300/J030v13n03_11 [ Links ]

Luoma, SN, Rainbow, PS. 2005. Why is metal bioaccumulation so variable? Biodynamics as a unifying concept. Environ Sci Tech. 39(7):1921-1931. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048947e [ Links ]

McCarron, P, Kilcoyne, J, Hess, P. 2008. Effects of cooking and heat treatment on concentration and tissue distribution of okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin-2 in mussels (Mytilus edulis). Toxicon. 51(6):1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.01.009 [ Links ]

Miklavčič, A, Stibilj, V, Heath, E, Polak, T, Tratnik, JS, Klavž, J, Mazej, D, Horvat, M. 2011. Mercury, selenium, PCBs and fatty acids in fresh and canned fish available on the Slovenian market. Food Chem. 124:711-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.040 [ Links ]

Moody, JR, Lindstrom, RM. 1977. Selection and cleaning of plastic containers for storage of trace element samples. Anal Chem. 49(14):2264-2267. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50022a039 [ Links ]

Morgan, JN, Berry, MR, Graves, RL. 1997. Effects of commonly used cooking practices on total mercury concentration in fish and their impact on exposure assessments. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 7(1):119-133. [ Links ]

Newman, MC. 2009. Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. 571 p. [ Links ]

[SSA] Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia. 1997 DIC 10. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-129-SSA1-1995, Bienes y servicios. Productos de la pesca: secos-salados, ahumados, moluscos cefalópodos y gasterópodos frescos-refrigerados y congelados. Disposiciones y especificaciones sanitarias. Mexico City (Mexico): Diario Oficial de la Federación. 32 p. [ Links ]

[SSA] Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia. 1994 MAR 23. Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-032-SSA1-1993, Bienes y servicios. Productos de la pesca. Moluscos bivalvos en conserva. Especificaciones sanitarias. Mexico City (Mexico): Diario Oficial de la Federación. 5 p. [ Links ]

Olmedo, P, Pla, A, Hernández, AF, Barbier, F, Ayouni, L, Gil, F. 2013. Determination of toxic elements (mercury, cadmium, lead, tin and arsenic) in fish and shellfish samples. Risk assessment for the consumers. Environ Int. 59:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.005 [ Links ]

Oduoza, CF. 1992. Studies of food value and contaminants in canned foods. Food Chem. 44(1):9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(92)90250-6 [ Links ]

Pan, K, Wang, W-X. 2011. Mercury accumulation in marine bivalves: Influences of biodynamics and feeding niche. Environ Pollut. 159(10):2500-2506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.029 [ Links ]

Pawlaczyk, A, Przerywacz, A, Gajek, M, Szynkowska-Jozwik, MI. 2020. Risk of mercury ingestion from canned fish in Poland. Molecules. 25(24):5884. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245884 [ Links ]

Ruelas-Inzunza, J, Páez-Osuna, F, Ruiz-Fernández, AC, Zamora-Arellano, N. 2011a. Health risk associated to dietary intake of mercury in selected coastal areas of Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 86:180-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0189-z [ Links ]

Ruelas-Inzunza, J, Patiño-Mejía, C, Soto-Jiménez, M, Barba-Quintero, G, Spanopoulos-Hernández, M. 2011b. Total mercury in canned yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares marketed in northwest Mexico. Food Chem Toxicol. 49(12):3070-3073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.030 [ Links ]

Tahán, JE, Sánchez, JM, Granadillo, VA, Cubillán, HS, Romero, RA. 1995. Concentration of total Al, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Na, Pb, and Zn in commercial canned seafood determined by atomic spectrometric means after mineralization by microwave heating. J Agric Food Chem. 43(4): 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00052a012 [ Links ]

Taylor, VF, Jackson, BP, Chen, CY. 2008. Mercury speciation and total trace element determination of low-biomass biological samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 392:1283-1290. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00216-008-2403-3 [ Links ]

Torres-Escribano, S, Vélez, D, Montoro, R. 2010. Mercury and methylmercury bioaccessibility in swordfish. Food Addit Contam Part A. 27(3):327-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440040903365272 [ Links ]

[UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. 2019. Global Mercury Assessment 2018. Geneva (Switzerland): UNEP. 62 p. [ Links ]

Yi, W, Jianying, H, Lihui, A, Wei, A, Min, Y, Mitsuaki, I, Tatsuya, H, Shu, T. 2005. Determination of trophic relationships within a Bohai Bay food web using stable δ15N and δ13C analysis. Chin Sci Bull. 50(10):1021-1025. https://doi.org/10.1360/04wd0283 [ Links ]

1Copyediting by MacTavish Scientific Editing.

Received: November 09, 2021; Accepted: February 13, 2023

*Corresponding author. E-mail: jorge.ri@mazatlan.tecnm.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License