SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número4Aspectos biológicos y uso de hábitat del calamar dedal, Lolliguncula panamensis, capturado en el golfo de CaliforniaEvaluación de 2 métodos de incubación ex situ para huevos de tortugas marinas considerando temperatura del nido, éxito de eclosión, y calidad de los neonatos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencias marinas

versión impresa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.47 no.4 Ensenada oct./dic. 2021  Epub 09-Dic-2022

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v47i4.3095 

Articles

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosing marine pathogens in tissues of Crassostrea spp. and white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, farmed in Mexico

Ismael Mendoza-Avilés1 

Carla A Muñoz-Rojas2 

Mario Rojas2 

Norma Estrada3  * 

1Departamento Académico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, Carretera al Sur km 5.5 s/n, 23080, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.

2Programa de Acuicultura, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Av. IPN 195, 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.

3Programa Cátedras Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Av. IPN 195, 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.


Abstract

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is an accurate, sensitive, rapid, and easy-to-perform method for gene amplification under isothermal conditions, and it has served as a powerful diagnostic tool. In this study, we used LAMP to develop a diagnostic protocol for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus and white spot syndrome virus in whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), and Perkinsus spp. in Crassostrea spp. in Mexico. These pathogens are associated with different diseases and are considered a threat in the aquaculture industry. Infected and uninfected oysters and shrimp were obtained from farms in the northwest coast of Mexico to standardize the LAMP assay. We determined the candidate target genes in the first-round analysis of many sets of primers, and then we chose a set of primers that successfully amplified with Mexican samples. We optimized the LAMP reactions for each pathogen with the chosen primer sets using temperature gradients from 61 to 65 ºC, DNA concentrations from 2.5 pg to 250.0 ng, and reaction times from 10 to 60 min. This study established a diagnostic procedure for detecting pathogens in oysters and shrimp from Mexico. Early diagnosis and treatment of pathogens can immensely reduce disease transmission in aquaculture farms.

Key words:  Crassostrea spp.; Litopenaeus vannamei; loop-mediated isothermal amplification; aquaculture; pathogens

Resumen

La amplificación isotérmica mediada por bucle (LAMP, por sus siglas en inglés) es un método preciso, sensible, rápido y fácil de realizar para la amplificación de genes en condiciones isotérmicas, y ha servido como una herramienta de diagnóstico poderosa. En este estudio, desarrollamos un protocolo de diagnóstico con LAMP para la detección de Vibrio parahaemolyticus y el virus de la mancha blanca en camarón blanco (Litopenaeus vannamei) y de Perkinsus spp. en Crassostrea spp. en México. Estos patógenos están asociados a distintas enfermedades y se consideran una amenaza en la industria de la acuicultura. Se obtuvieron ostiones y camarones infectados y no infectados de granjas acuícolas en la costa noroeste de México para estandarizar la técnica de LAMP. Determinamos los genes candidatos a través de un primer análisis de muchos conjuntos de cebadores, y luego elegimos un conjunto de cebadores que amplificaron exitosamente con muestras mexicanas. Optimizamos las reacciones de LAMP para cada patógeno con los cebadores seleccionados usando gradientes de temperatura de 61 a 65 ºC, concentraciones de ADN de 2.5 pg a 250.0 ng y tiempos de reacción de 10 a 60 min. Este estudio estableció un procedimiento diagnóstico para la detección de patógenos de ostiones y camarones de México. El diagnóstico y el tratamiento temprano de patógenos pueden reducir enormemente la transmisión de enfermedades en granjas acuícolas.

Palabras clave:  Crassostrea spp.; Litopenaeus vannamei; amplificación isotérmica mediada por bucle; acuicultura; patógenos

Introduction

Given the deterioration of fisheries worldwide, aquaculture has been the alternative with the highest economic viability to solve the demand for food (FAO 2019). In Mexico, aquaculture has made significant progress in recent decades, particularly in the northwest region, where biological productivity, which includes fish, mollusks, and crustaceans, is the highest in the country. Oysters of the genus Crassostrea and the whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931), represent one of the highest marine aquaculture values in Mexico (SAGARPA 2017). Increased national and export marketing of products of aquaculture origin has favored the introduction, spread, and transmission of diseases (OIE 2019). In oyster farms Perkinsus spp. have threatened oyster productions (Cáceres-Martínez et al. 2008, Enríquez-Espinoza et al. 2010). Shrimp farms have been severely affected by mortality episodes associated with diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Vibrio (Soto-Rodriguez et al. 2010) and the white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) (Hasson et al. 2006). Adequate disease control in aquatic farming systems is needed to stop the spread of infectious pathogens. Disease monitoring in terms of surveillance and rapid diagnosis is an integral part of the aquaculture process. It allows for appropriate action to be readily taken when pathogens are detected and diseases are diagnosed before they become a significant problem for the farmer.

The design and development of methods for identifying pathogens in farmed aquatic organisms has progressed. Molecular detection techniques have been developed over the last decade, and identification of microorganisms is chiefly based on the analysis of nucleic acids. The advantages of these techniques include specificity, sensitivity, speed, and automation (Palomino-Camargo et al. 2014). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a molecular technique that amplifies DNA with high specificity, efficiency, and rapidity under isothermal conditions without requiring expensive specialized equipment (Notomi et al. 2000). The amplification requires 2 outer primers (F3 and B3), 2 inner primers (forward inner primer, FIP, and backward inner primer, BIP), and 2 loop primers (forward loop, LF, and backward loop, LB) (Notomi et al. 2000). These primers are complementary to 6 regions of the DNA sequence, ensuring very high specificity (Notomi et al. 2000, Nagamine et al. 2002). The primers bind laterally to different sites using strand-displacing Bst DNA polymerase, providing high amplification efficiency, with DNA being amplified to 109-1010 copies in 15-60 min (Notomi et al. 2000, Nagamine et al. 2002, Tomita et al. 2008, Mori and Notomi 2009, Li and Macdonald 2015). This method does not require a denatured DNA template (Nagamine et al. 2001), which allows users to avoid complicated DNA refinement protocols, and has shown high tolerance to inhibitory substances present in biological samples (Boehme et al. 2007, Kaneko et al. 2007, Mori and Notomi 2009, Francois et al. 2011). The amplified products can be detected by gel electrophoresis, a turbidimeter, lateral flow dipstick, or color or fluorescent indicators (Mori et al. 2001, Iwamoto et al. 2003, Mori et al. 2004, Tomita et al. 2008, Goto et al. 2009).

LAMP has been used to detect shellfish pathogens in many countries (Kono et al. 2004, Mekata et al. 2006, Yamazaki et al. 2008, Jaroenram et al. 2009, Mekata et al. 2009, Chen and Ge 2010, Arunrut et al. 2011, Maralit et al. 2012, Xu et al. 2012, Feng et al. 2013, Kongrueng et al. 2015). Many reports show inconsistencies with LAMP protocols for detecting pathogens from different geographic locations. Gene sequences of infectious agents may vary depending on the geographic region as a result of a set of variables that favor dispersion and potential modifications in their genotype. It is necessary to choose specific primers and probes for genomes from each location to avoid incorrect diagnoses. Here, we propose identifying potentially dangerous pathogens specific to Mexico in L. vannamei and Crassostrea spp. using LAMP. LAMP technology has great potential as a technique for the rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of pathogens that can be used regularly in farms or laboratories because it does not need expensive machines or highly trained personnel.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Tissue of L. vannamei infected with WSSV and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and tissues of the Cortez oyster (Crassostrea corteziensis) and the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) infected with Perkinsus spp. were obtained from farms in northwest Mexico. We selected tissues following the manual of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE 2019). We also used uninfected organisms as negative controls. DNA was extracted from tissues using the organic extraction method, as described in Sambrook et al. (1989), and it was resuspended by adding TE Buffer (10 mM, pH 8.0). DNA purity and concentration were estimated using the Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; MA, USA). DNA integrity was visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) using the UVP Biodoc-It 2 imaging system (Analytik Jena; Jena, Germany) and the fluorescent dye GelRed (Biotium; Fremont, CA).

Positive samples

DNA from infected and uninfected specimens was extracted and used as a template for end-point PCR amplification to obtain positive and negative control tissues using the LAMP outer primers (F3 and B3). PCR amplicon sizes were 208 bp for the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) (Perkinsus spp.), 213 bp for orf191 (WSSV), 231 bp for orf36 (WSSV), 229 bp for thermolabile hemolysin (tlh) (V. parahaemolyticus), and 183 for tox-R (V. parahaemolyticus). We cleaned up the PCR products for sequencing with Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ). The obtained sequence fragments were analyzed using the NCBI BLAST Sequence Analysis Tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, 20 November 2021) to corroborate the identity of the pathogen.

LAMP reaction conditions

For LAMP, we determined the candidate target genes in the first-round analysis of many sets of primers. We then chose those that successfully amplified with Mexican samples (Table 1) with high repeatability, efficiency, and specificity. Primers were synthesized by T4 Oligo (Irapuato, Mexico). The LAMP assay was carried out in a total of 25-µL volume containing 1 µL (40 µM) of each of the inner primers (FIP and BIP), 1 µL (5 µM) of each of the outer primers (F3 and B3), 1 µL (20 µM) of each of the loop primers (LF and LB), 4 µL (0.6 mM of each nucleotide) dNTP mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 µL (5 M) Betaine (Sigma-Aldrich), 1.5 µL (100 mM) MgSO4 (New England Biolabs), 1 µL (8 U·µL-1) of Bst DNA polymerase large fragment (New England Biolabs), 2.5 µL of ThermoPol buffer 10× (New England Biolabs), 1.0 µL of target DNA, and 8 µL of Milli-Q water. The tox-R primers (Chen and Ge 2010) have only one loop primer, and they were added as described for the concentration above, adding 1 µL more of Milli-Q water. Incubation was then carried out at 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 ºC for 60 min, and the reaction was terminated by heating at 90 ºC for 2 min. LAMP reactions were performed using the BioRad T100 Thermal Cycler (CA, USA). The products (10 µL) were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels to determine the optimal conditions. When the LAMP products are visualized using agarose gel electrophoresis, many bands of different sizes, up to the loading well, are documented. The resulting amplicon mixtures were confirmed with 10 µL of the products by fluorescence, using 1 µL of SYBR safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:500 dilution in Milli-Q water), and they were added to the solution after the reaction was completed. Gel and fluorescent tubes were documented using the UVP Biodoc-It 2 imaging system (Analytik Jena). DNA extracts from the uninfected shrimp and oyster samples were included as negative controls.

Table 1 Sequences of LAMP primers. 

Pathogen Genes Primer Sequence (5′3′) Source
Perkinsus spp. ITS2 (FJ841985) F3 TGGATTTTGGTATTTCAAAACGA  Feng et al. (2013)
B3 ATGTTTGTATCGGGAAGAAGAG 
FIP AGTGCTTATCGCACTTCGCTCAAACTCTCAACGATGGATGC 
BIP GATTTGCAGAATTCCGTGAACCAGCACTGATATGTATGTACAAAGAGG 
LF TCCTTCATCGATTCTCGAGC 
LB TCAACGCATACTGCACAAAG 
WSSV orf191 (AF332093) F3 AAAGTCTCATTTTAACAAGAGGA Jaroenram et al. (2009)
B3 ATTGGTCCAGTCTCAGCC
FIP CCATCTCTCTGAAGCGAGGAAAATTTTAATTTCTTTGCTCGAGGCC
BIP TGCTCTAGAGAATGCAGTACCTCTTTTGCGTAGTTCTTGCACGATT
LF TCTCCAGCCGGAGCCAAGT
LB ACAGAACCATAACAATGGTGAATGG
WSSV orf36 (AF369029) F3 AAACACCGGATGGGCTAA  Mekata et al. (2009)
B3 CAAGGCAATACAGAATGCG 
FIP TCCTGTCTTCAGGGAATACATATGCTCAGGGAAGAAATAGACCATG 
BIP GGACCCAAATCGAAATATAAGGCCTATGTTGCCCAAGATCCAC 
LF GTTAAGAATGATGCATCTAGTGCGA 
LB TGGAACAAAAGATGCTGCTCA 
Vibrio parahaemolyticus tlh (M36437) F3 AGCTACTCGAAAGATGATCC Yamazaki et al. (2008)
B3 GGTTGTATGAGAAGCGATTG
FIP ATGTTTTTAAATGAAACGGAGCTCCGGCAAAAAACGAAGATGGT
BIP ACGTCGCAAAACGTTATCCGGCGAAGAACGTAATGTCTG
LF ACCAGTAGCCGTCAATG
LB TTAGATTTGGCGAACGAGA
Vibrio parahaemolyticus tox-R (L11929) F3 TTGGATTCCACGCGTTAT Chen and Ge. (2010)
B3 CGTTCAATGCACTGCTCA
FIP TGAGATTCCGCAGGGTTTGTAATTATTTTTGGCACTATTACTACCG
BIP GTTCCGTCAGATTGGTGAGTATCTAGAAGGCAACCAGTTGTT
Loop AGAACGTACCAGTGATGACACC

WSSV, white spot syndrome virus; FIP, forward inner primer; BIP, backward inner primer; LF, forward loop primer; LB, backward loop primer.

The LAMP temperature, sensitivity, reaction time, and specificity were optimized for each pathogen sample. To evaluate sensitivity, 10-fold serial dilutions of the total genomic DNA, which was extracted from infected tissues and isolates, were used as templates to select the best dilution to work with, and LAMP was carried out for a predetermined time (63 min). To determine optimal amplification time, LAMP reactions were carried out at the temperature and DNA concentration previously chosen for each pathogen for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min; the time in the negative control was performed at 60 min. LAMP specificity was examined using the template DNA for other pathogens and uninfected samples. For identifying cross-reactivity with the ITS2 gene for Perkinsus spp., we used the toxic dinoflagellates Gymnodinium catenatum, Alexandrium tamiyavanichii, and Alexandrium catenella. For diagnosis of specificity for tlh and tox-R for V. parahaemolyticus, we used Vibrio campbelli, Photobacterium damselae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Providencia rettgeri, and Acinetobacter baumannii. For the diagnosis of specificity for orf36 and orf191 to evaluate WSSV, we used the shrimp hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus, oyster herpes virus, and squash leaf curl virus. DNA extraction was done as previously mentioned, and LAMP was carried out with the optimal conditions obtained above.

Results

Representative PCR products for the positive samples of tissues infected with the pathogens under study can be observed in Figure 1. These results were obtained with primers F3 and B3. Figures 2-6 show the gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes from the LAMP assays for the tested pathogens. The LAMP assay for detecting Perkinsus spp. in Crassostrea spp. tissues using the primers from the ITS2 gene region showed optimal amplification conditions at every probed temperature (61 to 65 ºC). Results were confirmed by the tubes with fluorescence (Fig. 2a). The assay for examining LAMP sensitivity showed that optimal DNA concentrations were 3.6 to 36.0 ng (Fig. 2b). The LAMP assay for determining optimal time started at 30 min and was kept on for 60 min (Fig. 2c). To detect V. parahaemolyticus in L. vannamei, we used the tlh (Fig. 3) and tox-R (Fig. 4) genes. With the tlh primers, the temperature optimization probe showed that amplification was performed at every temperature tested from 61 to 65 ºC (Fig. 3a). Figure 3b shows results from the LAMP sensitivity assay, and amplification was performed in all dilutions tested from 2.5 pg to 250.0 ng of total DNA. Optimization of the LAMP reaction time showed that amplification started at 40 min and continued for up to 60 min (Fig. 3c). The temperature optimization of the LAMP reaction with the tox-R primers showed that amplification was performed successfully from 61 to 64 ºC (Fig. 4a). LAMP sensitivity showed amplification at 25.0 to 250.0 ng of DNA (Fig. 4b), and time optimization started at 40 min and continued for up to 60 min (Fig. 4c). To detect WSSV in L. vannamei, we chose 2 sets of primers, orf36 (Fig. 5) and orf191 (Fig. 6). With the orf36 primer, optimization of LAMP assay temperature showed that amplification was performed at 61 to 65 ºC (Fig. 5a), sensitivity showed that the DNA amplified only at a concentration of 42.0 ng (Fig. 5b), and optimal amplification time was 30 to 60 min (Fig. 5c). With orf191, the optimal temperature showed that amplification occurred at all temperatures probed from 61 to 65 ºC (Fig. 6a), sensitivity showed that LAMP amplification was performed from 42.0 pg to 42.0 ng of DNA (Fig. 6b), and optimization of the LAMP reaction time showed that amplification started at 30 min and it kept on for up to 60 min (Fig. 6c).

Figure 1 Pathogens identified in tissues of infected Crassostrea spp. and Litopenaeus vannamei using end-point PCR amplification of DNA with the particular external primers for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (F3 and B3). Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane 1, Perkinsus spp. (ITS2); lane 2, white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) (orf191); lane 3, WSSV (orf36); lane 4, Vibrio parahaemolyticus (thermolabile hemolysin [tlh]); lane 5, V. parahaemolyticus (tox-R). PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. 

Figure 2 Optimization for the ITS2 gene with loop-mediated isothermal amplification optimization for detecting Perkinsus spp. in tissues of Crassostrea spp. (a) Temperature (ºC). (b) Sensitivity (pg). (c) Time of reaction (min). (d) Specificity: lane (+), Perkinsus marinus; lane 1, Gymnodinium catenatum; lane 2, Alexandrium tamiyavanichii; lane 3, Alexandrium catenella. Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane (-), negative control (DNA from uninfected tissue). Products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes. 

Figure 3 Optimization for the thermolabile hemolysin (tlh) gene with loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus in tissues of Litopenaeus vannamei. (a) Temperature (ºC). (b) Sensitivity (pg). (c) Time of reaction (min). (d) Specificity: lane (+), V. parahaemolyticus; lane 1, Vibrio campbelli; lane 2, Photobacterium damselae; lane 3, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; lane 4, Providencia rettgeri; lane 5, Acinetobacter baumannii. Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane (-), negative control (DNA from uninfected tissue). Products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes. 

Figure 4 Optimization for the tox-R gene with loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus in tissues of Litopenaeus vannamei. (a) Temperature (ºC). (b) Sensitivity (pg). (c) Time of reaction (min). (d) Specificity: lane (+), V. parahaemolyticus; lane 1,Vibrio campbelli; lane 2, Photobacterium damselae; lane 3, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; lane 4, Providencia rettgeri; lane 5, Acinetobacter baumannii. Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane (-), negative control (DNA from uninfected tissue). Products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes. 

Figure 5 Optimization for the orf36 gene with loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detecting white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in tissues of Litopenaeus vannamei. (a) Temperature (ºC). (b) Sensitivity (pg). (c) Time of reaction (min). (d) Specificity: lane (+), WSSV; lane 1, shrimp hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus; lane 2, oyster herpes virus; lane 3, squash leaf curl virus. Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane (-), negative control (DNA from uninfected tissue). Products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes. 

Figure 6 Optimization for the orf191 gene with loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detecting white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in tissues of Litopenaeus vannamei. (a) Temperature (ºC). (b) Sensitivity (pg). (c) Time of reaction (min). (d) Specificity: lane (+), WSSV; lane 1, shrimp hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus; lane 2, oyster herpes virus; lane 3, squash leaf curl virus. Lane M, marker (2 log DNA ladder; kb, kilobases); lane (-), negative control (DNA from uninfected tissue). Products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent tubes. 

We tested the cross-reaction with other viruses and bacterial templates to determine LAMP method specificity (Figs. 2d, 3d, 4d, 5d, 6d). No positive results for LAMP were found for any of the samples, which indicates that the LAMP method showed high specificity for the probed shellfish pathogens.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the use of LAMP to detect pathogens in tissues of shrimp and oysters cultured in Mexico. We described a LAMP diagnostic protocol for Perkinsus spp., WSSV, and V. parahaemolyticus. These pathogens cause serious global oyster and shrimp production losses, which result in severe economic injuries. The World Organization for Animal Health considers WSSV to be the most common virus in shrimp cultures; furthermore, another type of pathogen that gravely affects shrimp cultures is the bacterium V. parahaemolyticus, which acts as an opportunistic agent, causing massive losses (OIE 2019). The protozoa Perkinsus marinus and Perkinsus olsenii are organisms that affect oyster cultures, primarily Crassostrea spp. (OIE 2019). Diseases caused by these pathogens must be declared to the World Organization for Animal Health as soon as they are detected.

Accurate detection of shellfish pathogens is a crucial step in the process of disease management. Numerous detection methods have been developed to monitor and control these pathogens in cultures. Techniques based on DNA amplification have sensitivity and specificity advantages that make them valuable pathogen detection tools. LAMP is a sensitive method that can amplify a few DNA copies in less than an hour under isothermal conditions (Notomi et al. 2000, Mori et al. 2001, Nagamine et al. 2002, Mori and Notomi 2009). It has been used to detect shellfish pathogens in many countries; however, many reports show inconsistencies in LAMP protocols for detecting pathogens from different geographic locations, as there is a set of variables that favor dispersion and potential modifications in pathogen genotypes. We tested many different sets of primers for each pathogen, and we developed the protocol using the primers and assay conditions for LAMP reactions that were most suitable for pathogens in Mexican aquaculture systems. Our assay could also be used in wild-type organisms, different development stages, and other shellfish species when the pathogen is present.

The LAMP protocol we describe here is a sensitive, specific, and rapid method for detecting shellfish pathogens. Many reports have evaluated LAMP and argue that it has many advantages over other molecular techniques. LAMP is a single-step procedure that requires 4 to 6 primers that bind laterally to different sites using strand-displacement Bst DNA polymerase, permitting extremely specific amplification under isothermal conditions (Notomi et al. 2000). It does not require a denatured DNA template, avoiding time-consuming DNA extraction methods, and has low susceptibility to inhibitory compounds; the results can be visualized by the naked eye with color or fluorescent DNA dyes. As a result, it allows the use of simple and cost-effective reaction equipment and simplified protocols (Notomi et al. 2000, Nagamine et al. 2001, Kaneko et al. 2007, Tomita et al. 2008, Goto et al. 2009, Mori and Notomi 2009, Francois et al. 2011, Li and Macdonald 2015, Tanner et al. 2015).

The protocol that we show in this work is a basic LAMP method, designed to be carried out mainly in the laboratory. LAMP has proven to be broadly functional for on-site detection of pathogens due to its adaptability to varied detection approaches and settings, including many commercial portable kits, for which the workflow does not require highly qualified personnel (Kiatpathomchai et al. 2008, Jaroenram et al. 2009, Khunthong et al. 2013, Mori et al. 2013, Tomlinson 2013, Dhama et al. 2014, Notomi et al. 2015, Besuschio et al. 2017, Khan et al. 2017, Wong et al. 2018, Nzelu et al. 2019, Becherer 2020). Rapid and accurate detection of latent infections can provide farmers with reliable information on the infection status for early prevention and control of disease outbreaks. As efforts to raise production levels continue and research interest in aquaculture grows, the use of biosurveillance methods is also expanding. Research facilities can then use the technology, universities, government agencies, and shellfish farms to become a staple for detecting pathogens in aquaculture in Mexico and other countries.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT, Mexico; grant no. 247567 to NE). IMA received a CONACYT scholarship (no. 26089) for the development of this work. We acknowledge the Aquatic Health Committees in Baja California Sur, Nayarit, Sonora, and Sinaloa for notifying us of the presence of pathogens in aquaculture farms and allowing the collection of samples.

References

Arunrut N, Prombun P, Saksmerprome V, Flegel TW, Kiatpathomchai W. 2011. Rapid and sensitive detection of infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. J Virol Methods. 171(1):21-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.09.022 [ Links ]

Becherer L, Borst N, Bakheit M, Frischmann S, Zengerle R, von Stetten F. 2020. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) - review and classification of methods for sequence-specific detection. Anal Methods. 12(6):717-746. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ay02246e [ Links ]

Besuschio SA, Llano-Murcia M, Benatar AF, Monnerat S, Cruz I, Picado A, Curto MA, Kubota Y, Wehrendt DP, Pavia P, et al. 2017. Analytical sensitivity and specificity of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit prototype for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in human blood samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 11(7):e0005779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005779 [ Links ]

Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Henostroza G, Raqib R, Rahim Z, Gerhardt M, Sanga E, Hoelscher M, Notomi T, Hase T, et al. 2007. Operational feasibility of using loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in microscopy centers of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol. 45(6):1936-1940. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02352-06 [ Links ]

Cáceres-Martínez J, Vásquez-Yeomans R, Padilla-Lardizábal G, del Río Portilla MA. 2008. Perkinsus marinus in pleasure oyster Crassostrea corteziensis from Nayarit, Pacific coast of México. J Invert Pathol. 99(1):66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2008.03.005 [ Links ]

Chen S, Ge B. 2010. Development of a toxR-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiol. 10(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-41 [ Links ]

Dhama K, Karthik K, Chakraborty S, Tiwari R, Kapoor S, Kumar A, Thomas P. 2014. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA (LAMP): a new diagnostic tool lights the world of diagnosis of animal and human pathogens: a review. PJBS. 17(2):151-166. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2014.151.166 [ Links ]

Enríquez-Espinoza TL, Grijalva-Chon JM, Castro-Longoria R, Ramos-Paredes J. 2010. Perkinsus marinus in Crassostrea gigas in the Gulf of California. Dis Aquat Organ. 89(3):269-273. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02199 [ Links ]

[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. 2019. FAO Yearbook of fishery and aquaculture statistics. Rome (Italy): FAO. 84 p. ISBN 978-92-5-131669-6. [ Links ]

Feng C, Wang C, Lin X, Zhang Y, Lv J, Deng J, Yuan X, Mei L, Wu S. 2013. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for detection of Perkinsus spp. in mollusks. Dis Aquat Organ. 104(2):141-148. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02591 [ Links ]

Francois P, Tangomo M, Hibbs J, Bonetti EJ, Boehme CC, Notomi T, Perkins MD, Schrenzel J. 2011. Robustness of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction for diagnostic applications. FEMS Immunol Med Mic. 62(1):41-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2011.00785.x [ Links ]

Goto M, Honda E, Ogura A, Nomoto A, Hanaki KI. 2009. Colorimetric detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by using hydroxy naphthol blue. BioTechniques. 46(3):167-172. https://doi.org/10.2144/000113072 [ Links ]

Hasson KW, Fan Y, Reisinger T, Venuti J, Varner PW. 2006. White-spot syndrome virus (WSSV) introduction into the Gulf of Mexico and Texas freshwater systems through imported, frozen bait-shrimp. Dis Aquat Organ. 71(2):91-100. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao071091 [ Links ]

Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K. 2003. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol. 41(6):2616-2622. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.6.2616-2622.2003 [ Links ]

Jaroenram W, Kiatpathomchai W, Flegel TW. 2009. Rapid and sensitive detection of white spot syndrome virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. Mol Cell Probe. 23(2):65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2008.12.003 [ Links ]

Kaneko H, Kawana T, Fukushima E, Suzutani T. 2007. Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 70(3):499-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2006.08.008 [ Links ]

Khan M, Li B, Jiang Y, Weng Q, Chen Q. 2017. Evaluation of different PCR-based assays and LAMP method for rapid detection of Phytophthora infestans by targeting the ypt1 gene. Front Microbiol. 8:1920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01920 [ Links ]

Khunthong S, Jaroenram W, Arunrut N, Suebsing R, Mungsantisuk I, Kiatpathomchai W. 2013. Rapid and sensitive detection of shrimp yellow head virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. J Virol Methods. 188(1-2):51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.11.041 [ Links ]

Kiatpathomchai W, Jaroenram W, Arunrut N, Jitrapakdee S, Flegel TW. 2008. Shrimp Taura syndrome virus detection by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. J Virol Methods. 153(2):214-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.06.025 [ Links ]

Kongrueng J, Tansila N, Mitraparp-arthorn P, Nishibuchi M, Vora, GJ, Vuddhakul V. 2015. LAMP assay to detect Vibrio parahaemolyticus causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in shrimp. Aquac Int. 23(5):1179-1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9874-3 [ Links ]

Kono T, Savan R, Sakai M, Itami T. 2004. Detection of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Virol Methods. 115(1):59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.09.015 [ Links ]

Li J, Macdonald J. 2015. Advances in isothermal amplification: novel strategies inspired by biological processes. Biosens Bioelectron. 64:196-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.069 [ Links ]

Maralit BA, Caipang CMA, Santos MD, Calpe AT, Maningas MBB. 2012. Development of primers for loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Philippine white spot syndrome virus isolates. AACL Bioflux. 5(4):274-281. [ Links ]

Mekata T, Kono T, Savan R, Sakai M, Kasornchandra J, Yoshida T, Itami T. 2006. Detection of yellow head virus in shrimp by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). J Virol Methods. 135(2):151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.02.012 [ Links ]

Mekata T, Sudhakaran R, Kono T, Supamattaya K, Linh NTH, Sakai M, Itami T. 2009. Real-time quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification as a simple method for detecting white spot syndrome virus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 48(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02479.x [ Links ]

Mori Y, Kanda H, Notomi T. 2013. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): recent progress in research and development. J Infect Chemother. 19(3):404-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-013-0590-0 [ Links ]

Mori Y, Kitao M, Tomita N, Notomi T. 2004. Real-time turbidimetry of LAMP reaction for quantifying template DNA. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 59(2):145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2003.12.005 [ Links ]

Mori Y, Nagamine K, Tomita N, Notomi T. 2001. Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 289(1):150-154. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5921 [ Links ]

Mori Y, Notomi T. 2009. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 15(2):62-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-009-0669-9 [ Links ]

Nagamine K, Hase T, Notomi T. 2002. Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol Cell Probe. 16(3):223-229. https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.2002.0415 [ Links ]

Nagamine K, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka K, Hase T, Notomi T. 2001. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction using a nondenatured template. Clin Chem. 47(9):1742-1743. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.9.1742 [ Links ]

Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H. 2015. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J Microbiol. 53(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-015-4656-9 [ Links ]

Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T. 2000. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:(12):e63. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.12.e63 [ Links ]

Nzelu CO, Kato H, Peters NC. 2019. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): An advanced molecular point-of-care technique for the detection of Leishmania infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 13(11):e0007698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007698 [ Links ]

[OIE] World Organisation for Animal Health. 2019. Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals = Manual de las Pruebas de Diagnóstico para los Animales Acuáticos. [place unknown]: OIE; accessed Nov 2019. https://www.oie.int/es/normas/manual-acuatico/acceso-en-linea/Links ]

Palomino-Camargo C, González-Muñoz Y. 2014. Técnicas moleculares para la detección e identificación de patógenos en alimentos: Ventajas y limitaciones = Molecular techniques for detection and identification of pathogens in food: advantages and limitations. Rev Peru Med Exp. Salud Publica. 31(3):535-546. [ Links ]

[SAGARPA] Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo rural, Pesca y Alimentación. 2017. Anuario Estadístico de Acuicultura y Pesca 2017. México: CONAPESCA; accessed Jan 2019. https://www.conapesca.gob.mx/work/sites/cona/dgppe/2017/ANUARIO_ESTADISTICO_2017.pdfLinks ]

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Vol. 1, 2 and 3. 2nd. ed. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1669 p. [ Links ]

Soto-Rodriguez SA, Gomez-Gil B, Lozano R, Roque A. 2010. Density of vibrios in hemolymph and hepatopancreas of diseased Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, from northwestern Mexico. J World Aquacult Soc. 41(S1):76-83.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2009.00335.x [ Links ]

Tanner NA, Zhang Y, Evans TC. 2015. Visual detection of isothermal nucleic acid amplification using pH-sensitive dyes. BioTechniques. 58(2):59-68. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114253 [ Links ]

Tomita N, Mori Y, Kanda H, Notomi T. 2008. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of gene sequences and simple visual detection of products. Nat Protoc. 3(5):877-882. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.57 [ Links ]

Tomlinson J. 2013. In-field diagnostics using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. In: Dickinson M, Hodgetts J (eds.), Phytoplasma. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol. 938. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-089-2_25 [ Links ]

Wong YP, Othman S, Lau YL, Radu S, Chee HY. 2018. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a versatile technique for detection of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol. 124(3):626-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13647 [ Links ]

Xu H, He L, Lv S, Gong Q, Li S. 2012. Establishment of universal loop-mediated isothermal amplification method (LAMP) for rapid detection of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in aquatic organisms. African J Microbiol Res. 6(14):3447-3454. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1417 [ Links ]

Yamazaki W, Ishibashi M, Kawahara R, Inoue K. 2008. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for sensitive and rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiol. 8(1):163. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-163 [ Links ]

Received: January 23, 2020; Accepted: March 16, 2021

*Corresponding author. E-mail: nestrada@cibnor.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License