SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número2Tiempo de retención y capacidad de transporte de los remolinos del noroeste del golfo de MéxicoDinámica de cambios de uso de suelo y estimación de CO2 en manglares de la zona Marismas Nacionales, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Ciencias marinas

versão impressa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.47 no.2 Ensenada Abr./Jun. 2021  Epub 02-Dez-2022

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v47i2.3138 

Articles

Production of metabolites from Scenedesmus sp. and a microalgal consortium cultured in unconventional media

Kevin A González-Falfán1 

Claudia Guerrero-Barajas1 

Jesús A Badillo-Corona1 

Luis C Fernández-Linares1  * 

1Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Acueducto s/n, Col. Barrio la Laguna Ticomán, 07340, Mexico City, Mexico


Abstract

Growth comparisons were made between a microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. cultivated in treated wastewater (TWw) enriched with 1 mL·L-1 Bayfolan Forte fertilizer (BM), TWw enriched with (NH4)2HPO4 (PAM), TWw enriched with NH4HCO3 (BCAM), tap water with piggery wastewater (PEM), tap water with piggery wastewater digestate (PDM), and raw wastewater (Ww). Nitrogen (N) content in the media, except for TWw, was adjusted to 80 mg·L-1 N (NH4 +-N and NO3 --N). Unconventional low-cost media with lower nutrient contents (BM and TWw) showed adequate productions of biomass and lipids. PEM was the most advantageous medium, showing the highest biomass productivity with the consortium (191.25 ± 6.25 g·L-1·d-1) and a lipid productivity of 36.75 ± 9.90 mg·L-1·d-1. The fatty acid profile was composed mainly of C16 and C18. PAM, PEM, and PDM showed a higher proportion of saturated fatty acids (60%-69%), whereas the composition of unsaturated fatty acids was in the range of 31% to 38%. In PEM and PDM the removal of NH4 + was 100%; however, there were NH4 + losses (as NH3) due to volatilization (46%). Unconventional media, especially Ww, are an option for growing microalgae.

Key words: fertilizer; microalgae-bacteria consortium; Scenedesmus sp.; wastewater

Resumen

Se comparó el crecimiento de un consorcio de microalgas y de Scenedesmus sp. cultivados en aguas residuales tratadas (ART) enriquecidas con 1 mL·L-1 de fertilizante Bayfolan Forte (MB), ART enriquecidas con (NH4)2HPO4 (MPA), ART enriquecidas con NH4HCO3 (MBCA), agua del grifo con aguas residuales porcinas (MEP), agua del grifo con digestato de aguas residuales porcinas (MDP) y aguas residuales sin tratar (AR). El contenido de nitrógeno (N) de los medios, excepto el medio AR, se ajustó a 80 mg·L-1 de N (NH4 +-N y NO3 --N). Los medios no convencionales con menor contenido de nutrientes y costo (MB y AR) presentaron buenas producciones de biomas y lípidos. MEP fue el medio más ventajoso al presentar la mayor productividad de biomasa con el consorcio (191.25 ± 6.25 g·L-1·d-1) y una productividad de lípidos de 36.75 ± 9.90 mg·L-1·d-1. El perfil de ácidos grasos estuvo constituido principalmente de C16 y C18. MPA, MEP y MDP mostraron una mayor proporción de ácidos grasos saturados (60%-69%), mientras que la composición de los ácidos grasos insaturados osciló entre 31% y 38%. En MEP y MDP, la eliminación de NH4 + fue del 100%; sin embargo, hubo pérdidas de NH4 + debido al arrastre por aire (46%). Los medios no convencionales, específicamente las AR, son una opción para el cultivo de microalgas.

Palabras clave: fertilizante; consorcio de microalgas-bacterias; Scenedesmus sp.; aguas residuales

Introduction

The production of biofuels from microalgae is promising because microalgae do not compete for food crops or arable land, present high growth rates, and are capable of fixing CO2 through photosynthesis and releasing O2 into the atmosphere. Nitrogen (N) is a key nutrient for the growth and biochemical composition of microalgae, and the accumulation of lipids and carbohydrates increases under N limitation (Liu et al. 2017, Huy et al. 2018).

One of the main problems of large-scale microalgal biomass production is the supply of N and phosphorous (P). N fertilizers require enormous amounts of fossil energy (Metz et al. 2007), the main contributor to the carbon footprint (Hillier et al. 2009). Moreover, the use of fertilizers for culturing microalgae competes with their use in agriculture (Chisti 2013). One of the obstacles to large-scale production of microalgae for energy purposes is still the high cost of production, especially the availability and cost of feedstock (Acién et al. 2012).

The use of organic fertilizers such as animal excreta, sludge from wastewater, and anaerobic digestate with high nutrient contents has been proposed as an economical alternative for microalgae culture (Nayak et al. 2016, Wang et al. 2016a, El Shimi and Moustafa 2017, Liu et al. 2017, Huy et al. 2018). The use of wastewater (Gonçalves et al. 2017, Ho et al. 2019, Rodríguez-Mata et al. 2019) and wastewater enriched with inorganic fertilizers, composed of N, P, and potassium (K), is an economical alternative for large-scale cultivation (Nayak et al. 2016).

Microalgae can remove N and P from municipal wastewater, leaving very low concentrations, while converting these nutrients into biomass (Boelee et al. 2011). The microalgae genera Chlorella and Scenedesmus are the most studied in regards to their culture in wastewaters, particularly the species Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus (Park et al. 2010, Ji et al. 2013, Xu et al. 2015, Wang et al. 2016b). Scenedesmus obliquus has been used to treat wastewater and to obtain valuable biomass in bubble-column photobioreactors. Scenedesmus obliquus grown in a culture medium supplemented with 40% of piggery wastewater effluent showed biomass and lipid productivities of 15.5 and 0.13 mg·L-1·d-1, respectively, and removals of 96.1 mg total N and 2.48 mg total P were observed (Ji et al. 2013). Removal of 79% of NH4 + and 43% of PO4 3- from a mixture of wastewater (containing 145.2 mg·L-1 NH4 + and 21.1 mg·L-1 PO4 3-) and 7% of landfill leachate was achieved with S. obliquus, which accumulated 12%-16% of lipids in cells (Hernández-García et al. 2019). When Scenedesmus sp. AMDD was grown in treated municipal wastewater in chemostats under different dilution rates or hydraulic retention times, biomass composition was strongly controlled by the rate of wastewater nutrient removal, and total fatty acids were only accumulated when growth rates were very low or when a prolonged nutrient starvation regime was imposed (Dickinson et al. 2013). Microalgae production using secondary treated wastewater decreases process costs by minimizing the use of freshwater and fertilizers while contributing to the water purification process, greatly enhancing process sustainability (Gómez et al. 2013).

The present work compares the effect of 6 unconventional media (3 inorganic and 3 organic), some of which were used and compared for the first time, on the growth and productivity of a microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. and proposes different media for scaling microalgae culture in a sustainable way.

Materials and methods

Pretreatment and characterization of treated water, wastewater, and piggery wastewater

The wastewater (Ww) and the secondary treated wastewater (TWw) were obtained from the “San Juan Ixhuatepec” treatment plant located in Tlalnepantla, Mexico (19º31′13.8′′ N, 99º07′27.8′′ W). Ww and TWw were not filtered or sterilized. Piggery wastewater and piggery wastewater digestate were obtained from Productora Porcina Nopaltepec, located in Nopaltepec, Mexico (19º47′03.5′′ N, 98º43′41.6′′ W). Both piggery wastewater and piggery wastewater digestate were centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 5 min to remove the solids, and the supernatant was used as substrate. The compositions of the TWw, piggery wastewater, piggery wastewater digestate, and Bayfolan fertilizer used to prepare the culture media are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Composition of the wastewater, treated wastewater, piggery wastewater, and Bayfolan fertilizer used for culture media formulation. Data are presented as mean values and standard errors. 

Parameter TWw (mg·L-1) Ww (mg·L-1) PEM (mg·L-1) PDM (mg·L-1) BM (g·L-1)
N-NH4 + 3.10 ± 0.14 37.53 ± 0.18 2,605.80 ± 67.26 1,540.82 ± 43.49 44.75 ± 0.30
N-NO3 - 6.10 ± 0.46 0.20 ± 0.06 7.82 ± 2.72 25.95 ± 4.63 14.41 ± 0.73
PO4 3- 15.81 ± 0.05 15.45 ± 0.18 851.28 ± 0.61 259.30 ± 5.22 10.60 ± 0.17
COD 17.00 ± 4.15 239.00 ± 5.50 16,877.30 ± 397.61 2,368.67 ± 186.23 92.36 ± 1.67
TSS 0.00 ± 0.00 198.00 ± 14.00 50,000.80 ± 560.32 3,000.50 ± 420.25 0.00 ± 0.00
pH 7.80 8.42 7.13 8.22 7.01

TWw, treated wastewater; Ww, raw wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate; BM, Bayfolan medium formulated with 1 mL of Bayfolan Forte per liter of TWw; COD, chemical oxygen demand; TSS, total suspended solids.

Culture media

The 6 proposed media used in this work for culturing were (1) Bayfolan medium (BM), formulated with 1 mL of Bayfolan Forte per liter of TWw; (2) TWw enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4 (PAM); (3) TWw supplemented with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3 (BCAM); (4) tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater (PEM); (5) tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate (PDM); and (6) Ww. N content in BM, PAM, and BCAM was adjusted to 80 mg·L-1 N (NH4 +-N and NO3 --N), according to conventional media BBM and BG 11 with 500 mg·L-1 of sodium nitrate. N sources for BCAM and PAM were chosen based on their availability on the market, and NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2HPO4 served as sources of carbon (C) and P, respectively. For PEM and PDM, tap water treated in a purification plant was used instead of Ww or TWw because when scaling to 2,000 L or higher, water transportation from the closest treatment plant implied logistic issues and higher operational costs. Piggery wastewater and the piggery wastewater digestate were selected because of their high NH4 + content (Hu et al. 2013, Luo et al. 2016) and low cost.

Microorganisms and pre-culture conditions

The microalgae Scenedesmus sp. was obtained from the microalgae collection of the Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education at Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. The microalgal consortium was obtained from treated water and was mainly composed of Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. The consortium was obtained by growing the native microflora of the treated water from the plant in a 1-L photobioreactor under the conditions described below. The culture was maintained and reinoculated in treated water. Cultures were carried out in 1-L cylindrical photobioreactors (101 mm diameter × 203 mm height), with working volume of 0.9 L, illuminated on one side by cold-cathode fluorescent lamps (127 μE·m-2·s-1) under a 12:12 (light:dark) photoperiod, with aeration of 0.4 vvm and a temperature of 24 ± 1 ºC. Water losses due to evaporation were amended daily by adding sterile distilled water.

Prior to the experimentation, the consortium and Scenedesmus sp. were cultured in the 6 media. To synchronize the pre-cultures, 3 consecutive cultures were carried out during 13 d each, and the last one was used as the inoculum of the experiments. All the pre-inocula were adjusted to an oxygen demand of 0.8 (600 nm) and all the photobioreactors were inoculated at 10%, with the corresponding pre-inoculum.

Culture conditions

Microalgae were cultivated for 13 d in BM, PAM, BCAM, and Ww. In PEM and PDM media, microalgae were cultivated during 8 d because they grew faster in these media. NH4 +, PO4 3-, and NO3 - contents in the supernatant and productions of biomass, carbohydrates, and proteins were determined every 3 d; pigments, lipids, and the lipid profile were determined at the end of the culture. In addition, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined at the beginning and at the end of the PEM and PDM cultures. NH4 + losses by volatilization (as NH3) in PEM and PDM were quantified by passing the outlet of the gas stream from the photobioreactors through a 0.5 M H2SO4 solution, and dissolved NH3 was determined by a colorimetric method (APHA 1998).

Analytical methods

Determination of biomass, metabolites, and media composition

Biomass was determined by measuring absorbance at 750 and 600 nm with a spectrophotometer (DR3000 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer, HACH; USA). Biomass (dry weight basis) was determined in a moisture analyzer thermobalance using a glass microfiber membrane (Ahlstrom, 4.7 cm diameter, 1.1 μm pore size). Cells were counted using a Neubauer cell chamber. Protein contents were determined following the Lowry method (Lowry et al. 1951); carbohydrates, by the Dubois method (DuBois et al. 1956); and pigments, by the Wellburn method (Ritchie 2006). NH4 +, PO4 3-, and COD were determined following APHA methods (1998) in APHA (1998), and total suspended solids were measured according to standard methods (APHA 2005). NO3 - was analyzed according to the modified method reported by Keeney and Nelson (1982).

Determination of lipids and fatty acid methyl esters

Lipid extraction was performed as described by Ramírez-López et al. (2016). The composition of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) was determined in an Agilent gas chromatograph (Technologies 7890B; Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to mass spectrometry (Agilent Technologies 5977A Series GC/MSD System; Santa Clara, CA, USA). A VF-MAXms column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.50 μm) was used and Helium was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 2.4 mL·min-1. Injector temperature was maintained at 230 ºC. Oven temperature was adjusted to 140 ºC for 5 min and gradually increased 8 ºC every minute to 250 ºC for 15 min. The temperature of the transfer line (MSD) was maintained at 180 ºC. The temperatures of the source and the quadrupole were 230 and 150 ºC, respectively. Each peak of FAME was identified and quantified with the standard Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix.

Data analysis

Factor analysis (analysis of variance, P ≤ 0.05) and the Tukey HDS test were used to compare differences between treatment mean values. All the experiments were performed in triplicate.

Results

Effect of the medium on the production and productivity of biomass

The culture medium that yielded the highest biomass concentration (dry weight) of the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. was BM with 1.79 ± 0.05 and 1.77 ± 0.10 g·L-1, respectively. These concentrations were significantly higher than those obtained in the other 5 culture media. The media that yielded the highest biomass concentrations after BM were Ww and PEM, and there was a significant difference in biomass concentrations with respect to BCAM, PAM, and PDM (Fig. 1). Therefore, given the significant differences in biomass production and the increasing trend in biomass productivity, the media can be grouped as follows: BM ˃ (Ww and PEM ) ˃ (BCAM, PAM, and PDM), BM being the medium that yielded the highest biomass productivity.

Figure 1 Biomass production with the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. cultured in different media. BCAM, secondary treated wastewater added with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3; PAM, secondary treated wastewater enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4; BM, Bayfolan medium; Ww, wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate. 

Effect of the medium on lipid productivity and fatty acid methyl esters

The content of lipids in biomass in both the consortium and Scenedesmus sp. was 15%-16% in BCAM, 16%-22% in PAM, 9%-13% in BM, 21%-23% in Ww, 19%-32% PEM, and 30%-52% in PDM (Fig. 2). Lipid productivity in both cases, the consortium and Scenedesmus sp., fluctuated between 34.25 and 36.75 mg·L-1·d-1 in PEM, 32.83 and 38.67 mg·L-1·d-1 in PDM, and 24.87 and 26.41 mg·L-1·d-1 in Ww, all significantly higher than the lipid productivities obtained in BM, BCAM, and PAM (Table 2). In Ww, BCAM, PAM, PEM, and PDM, 90%-100% of NH4 + was removed from day 3 and, consequently, there was N limitation.

Figure 2 Biochemical composition of the biomass (percent yield) of the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. cultured in different media. BCAM, secondary treated wastewater added with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3; PAM, secondary treated wastewater enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4; BM, Bayfolan medium; Ww, raw wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate. 

Table 2 Effect of culture media on metabolite productivity of Scenedesmus sp. and the microalgal consortium. Data are presented as mean values and standard errors; the same letter denotes no significant differences (Tukey HDS-test, P ≤ 0.05). 

Microorganism Medium Biomass (mg·L-1·d-1) Carbohydrates (mg·L-1·d-1) Proteins (mg·L-1·d-1) Lipids (mg·L-1·d-1) Pigments (mg·L-1·d-1)
Microalgal consortium BCAM 54.61 ± 0.77c 12.13 ± 0.40b 10.16 ± 0.05b 8.31 ± 0.71b 0.42 ± 0.01c
PAM 45.38 ± 0.56c 6.91 ± 0.14b 11.86 ± 1.07b 7.54 ± 2.94b 0.32 ± 0.03cc
BM 138.46 ± 3.85a 48.13 ± 3.38a 32.34 ± 2.36a 12.01 ± 1.87b 1.96 ± 0.09b
Ww 106.15 ± 2.31b 33.56 ± 2.26c 14.78 ± 0.74b 24.87 ± 6.20a 0.70 ± 0.08 c
PEM 191.25 ± 6.25a 43.63 ± 1.43c 37.28 ± 5.33a 36.75 ± 9.90a 4.12 ± 0.08a
PDM 102.50 ± 2.50c 35.53 ± 0.25b 16.62 ± 1.52 b 32.83 ± 10.88a 1.81 ± 0.12b
Scenedesmus sp. BCAM 65.38 ± 0.77c 14.46 ± 0.47a 10.55 ± 0.03b 10.46 ± 2.40b 0.66 ± 0.05c
PAM 30.00 ± 0.28c 1.65 ± 0.99c 8.41 ± 2.33b 6.87 ± 0.62b 0.18 ± 0.02d
BM 136.15 ± 7.69a 31.96 ± 6.01b 36.32 ± 2.10a 17.54 ± 5.51b 3.12 ± 0.15a
Ww 125.38 ± 5.38b 43.95 ± 3.32a 15.74 ± 1.22b 26.41 ± 5.20a 1.08 ± 0.01b
PEM 115.00 ± 6.25b 29.53 ± 2.08b 32.68 ± 5.18a 34.25 ± 3.93a 1.84 ± 0.16b
PDM 118.75 ± 7.50b 16.38 ± 1.02b 13.62 ± 4.17b 38.67 ± 1.53a 0.63 ± 0.13c

BCAM, treated wastewater added with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3; PAM, treated wastewater enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4; BM, Bayfolan medium formulated with 1 mL of Bayfolan Forte per liter of treated wastewater; Ww, raw wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate

The fatty acid profiles for the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. in the different media consisted of palmitic acid (C16:0), palmitoleic acid (C16:1), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2), and linolenic acid (C18:3) (Table 3), which are suitable for the production of biodiesel (Anand et al. 2018, May-Cua 2019). The culture media PAM, PEM, and PDM exhibited a higher proportion of saturated fatty acids (60%-69% of total FAMEs) than BCAM, BM, and Ww (39%-48% of total FAMEs).

Table 3 Composition of fatty acid profiles of the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. in different culture media (percentage of total fatty acid methyl esters). 

Fatty Acid Microalgal consortium (%) Scenedesmus sp. (%)
BCAM PAM BM Ww PEM PDM BCAM PAM BM Ww PEM PDM
C16:0 36.76a 42.26a 33.39a 32.30a 43.57a 44.23a 32.12AB 41.07AB 34.03B 32.70AB 47.76A 46.00AB
C16:1 7.25a 5.34ab 5.62ab 3.27ab 4.34ab 4.19ab 3.97B 7.28A 4.55B 3.00B 3.13B 4.46B
C18:0 11.60b 19.95a 6.65b 7.15b 18.93ab 17.90ab 9.31BC 22.07A 7.05C 7.12C 21.33A 19.16AB
C18:1 20.40b 8.94bc 14.32bc 34.77a 6.50c 6.58c 17.63B 17.65BC 11.84CD 35.04A 5.09D 5.47D
C18:2 9.12ab 7.49ab 12.01a 6.17abc 4.07bc 3.78c 8.64A 7.16 AB 11.29A 5.80AB 3.18B 3.54B
C18:3n3 14.87a 16.02a 28.02a 16.35a 22.59a 23.3a 28.33A 10.76B 31.23A 16.33AB 19.52AB 21.37AB
C16-C18 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Unsaturated 51.64a 37.79a 59.96a 60.55a 37.50a 37.87a 58.57A 36.86A 58.92 A 60.18A 30.91A 34.84A
Saturated 48.36a 62.21a 40.04a 39.45a 62.50a 62.13a 41.43AB 63.14AB 41.08B 39.82B 69.09A 65.16AB

BCAM, treated wastewater added with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3; PAM, treated wastewater enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4; BM, Bayfolan medium formulated with 1 mL of Bayfolan Forte per liter of treated wastewater; Ww, raw wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate.

Mean values that do not share a letter are significantly different. The differences are between the media for each crop (consortium and Scenedesmus sp., separately).

Effect of the medium on the productivity of proteins, carbohydrates, and total pigments

The productivities of proteins in the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. cultures with BM and PEM were significantly higher with respect to those obtained with BCAM, PAM, Ww, and PDM (Table 2). The protein productivities obtained with the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. were, respectively, 32.34 ± 2.36 mg·L-1·d-1 and 36.32 ± 2.10 mg·L-1·d-1 in BM and 37.28 ± 5.33 mg·L-1·d-1 and 32.68 ± 5.18 mg·L-1·d-1 in PEM, and while they were significantly lower in BCAM, PAM, Ww, and PDM, the productivity in PAM was 4 times lower than that obtained in PEM and BM.

The highest productivity of carbohydrates from the microalgal consortium was obtained in BM (48.13 ± 3.38 mg·L-1·d-1) and that from Scenedesmus sp. was obtained in Ww (43.95 ± 3.32 mg·L-1·d-1), both significantly higher than those in BCAM, PAM, PEM, and PDM (50% lower than BM) (Table 2). n BM, Ww, and PDM, up to 35% of carbohydrates were obtained in the biomass (Fig. 2).

Regarding the productivities of total pigments, no significant differences were observed between the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. in the BM and PEM. On the other hand, in BCAM, PAM, Ww, and PDM, the production of total pigments was up to 18 times lower than in BM (Table 2).

Nutrient removal

In BCAM, PAM, and Ww, NH4 + removal was 60% and 95% on the third and sixth day, respectively, whereas in PEM and PDM, 100% of NH4 + had already been removed by day three. In BCAM, NH4 +, NO3 -, and PO4 3- removals were higher than 92%. The initial concentration of PO4 3- was 12-14 mg·L-1 with a removal percentage of 92%, whereas in BM, 93% removal was achieved (Table 4). In BCAM, NO3 - removal was 99%, whereas in PAM it was only 59% with the microalgal consortium and null with Scenedesmus sp. In BM, NH4 + and PO4 3- removals were 90% and 93%-94% with the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp., respectively, whereas the removal of NO3 - with Scenedesmus sp. was 30% lower than that obtained with the consortium (Table 4). Regarding COD, in PEM, 1,043 mg·L-1 of COD were removed with Scenedesmus sp. (86%), whereas in PDM only 26 mg·L-1 of COD (10%) were removed.

Table 4 Initial and final composition and removal efficiency in the 6 culture media with the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. 

Microorganism Initial concentration (mg·L-1) Final concentration (mg·L-1) Removal (%)
Media NH4+-N NO3--N PO43--P COD NH4+-N NO3--N PO43--P COD NH4+-N NO3--N PO43--P COD
Microalga consortium BCAM 56.37 ± 0.81 23.69 ± 1.22 3.98 ± 0.49 - 1.74 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.07 0.30 ± 0.04 - 99.90 99.78 30.18 -
PAM 57.00 ± 0.87 20.24 ± 0.39 53.06 ± 0.13 - 1.67 ± 0.04 8.36 ± 7.89 21.21 ± 3.98 - 97.07 58.70 60.02 -
BM 20.66 ± 1.42 79.58 ± 5.01 40.70 ± 2.24 - 4.18 ± 0.11 31.30 ± 22.11 2.89 ± 0.73 - 79.76 60.66 92.90 -
Ww 40.90 ± 1.44 0.00 ± 0.00 5.97 ± 0.10 - 1.73 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.30 0.64 ± 0.05 - 95.80 * 89.29 -
PEM 90.61 ± 9.63 2.51 ± 1.04 14.05 ± 1.36 1,165.18 ± 73.20 0.00 5.27 ± 0.33 2.95 ± 0.71 169.12 ± 0.60 100 * 78.98 85.49
PDM 78.10 ± 8.44 2.78 ± 1.06 1.55 ± 0.09 79.47 ± 33.78 0.00 5.80 ± 1.25 0.57 ± 0.13 58.47 ± 15.27 100 * 63.11 26.43
Scenedesmus sp. BCAM 56.50 ± 0.36 23.80 ± 1.92 4.73 ± 0.04 - 1.84 ± 0.03 0.00 ± 0.00 0.37 ± 0.04 - 96.86 98.39 92.27 -
PAM 56.30 ± 0.91 21.95 ± 4.90 50.13 ± 0.53 - 2.75 ± 0.63 24.72 ± 2.71 13.58 ± 4.43 - 95.11 * 54.70 -
BM 21.03 ± 0.61 78.67 ± 2.58 40.06 ± 0.61 - 3.81 ± 0.29 53.93 ± 18.49 2.52 ± 0.81 - 89.97 31.38 93.70 -
Ww 41.54 ± 0.44 0.00 5.71 ± 0.42 - 1.77 ± 0.11 0.84 ± 0.87 0.62 ± 0.07 - 95.80 * 89.15 -
PEM 88.08 ± 15.32 2.89 ± 3.02 17.05 ± 0.50 1,218.93 ± 196.99 0.00 4.26 ± 0.53 1.84 ± 0.37 176.19 ± 25.91 100 * 89.23 85.55
PDM 77.66 ± 5.02 2.80 ± 0.36 1.31 ± 0.06 104.25 ± 19.99 0.00 4.51 ± 0.10 0.40 ± 0.10 77.65 ± 18.06 100 * 69.04 9.64

COD, chemical oxygen demand; BCAM, treated wastewater added with 0.1977 g·L-1 NH4HCO3; PAM, treated wastewater enriched with 0.3303 g·L-1 (NH4)2HPO4; BM, Bayfolan medium formulated with 1 mL of Bayfolan Forte per liter of treated wastewater; Ww, raw wastewater; PEM, tap water with 23.5% of piggery wastewater; PDM, tap water with 39.75% of piggery wastewater digestate.

*The results show a slight increase in nitrates.

NH4 + losses by stripping

The highest loss of NH4 + by volatilization (as NH3) was recorded in PDM, that is, 33% (8.70 ± 1.78 mg·L-1·d-1 NH4 +) for the consortium and 46% (11.53 ± 0.32 mg·L-1·d-1 NH4 +) for Scenedesmus sp. at pH of 9.93 and 10.03, respectively, with no significant difference between them. In PEM the loss was significantly lower than in PDM, with 2% (2.24 ± 0.58 mg·L-1·d-1 NH4 +) for the consortium and 7% (0.56 ± 0.42 mg·L-1·d-1 NH4 +) for Scenedesmus sp. at an average pH of 9.68.

Discussion

Biomass production in Ww was 15.33% lower with the microalgal consortium compared with that obtained with Scenedesmus sp., whereas in PEM, biomass production with Scenedesmus sp. was 40% lower than that obtained with the microalgal consortium. Lam et al. (2017) cultured C. vulgaris in non-sterilized wastewater (2.70 and 24.19 mg·L-1 of total N and P, respectively), obtaining 40.76 mg·L-1·d-1 (dry weight) of biomass; this productivity was 3 times lower than that obtained in Ww in the present study (initial concentration of 32.20 and 8.84 mg·L-1 of total N and P, respectively). Unlike in the other 5 media, in BM, which was formulated with the commercial fertilizer Bayfolan, the main source of N was NO3 -; moreover, P contents varied significantly between media (Table 4). Since the main goal of the present work was to identify a nonconventional medium that could be used at large scale, the C/P and COD/N/P ratios were not adjusted. However, particular care was given to N concentrations during the preparation of the media. The results obtained from the experimentation with all the media showed that the 2 best options to produce biomass were Ww and PEM, both of which involve residue treatment and are available at low cost.

Nayak et al. (2016) reported the growth of Scenedesmus sp. in a 500-mL Erlenmeyer flask with 200 mL of medium, prepared with 1 g·L-1 of a NPK fertilizer (10:26:26) and 0.10 g·L-1 of urea, obtaining a biomass productivity of 45 mg·L-1·d-1 (peso seco). A 2-fold biomass production and 2.8 times higher productivity were obtained in the present study with Scenedesmus sp. and the consortium in BM. The Bayfolan fertilizer (N:P:K, 11:1:1) is a foliar fertilizer that contains micronutrients, vitamins, and indoleacetic acid (phytohormone). This auxin regulates growth in higher plants, and in several species of microalgae, it increases growth rate, stress tolerance, lipid content, and biomass productivity (Lu and Xu 2015). Muriellopsis sp. and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata grown in 300-mL bubble-column glass bioreactors containing freshwater with 40%-50% concentrate from a wastewater treatment plant, under controlled conditions (temperature of 25 ºC, aeration of 0.2 vvm, CO2 injected on demand, artificial illumination under a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, 1,850 μE·m-2·s-1), reached biomass productivity values up to 1.13 and 1.02 g·L-1·d-1, respectively (Morales-Amaral et al. 2015). Moreover, Gomez et al. (2013) cultured Muriellopsis sp. in the same bubble-column, using TWw as medium and controlled conditions (temperature of 23 ± 2 ºC, 8.0 ± 0.1 pH, on-demand CO2 injection into the airflow entering the reactors, and artificial illumination 12:12 h light:dark cycle, 800 μE·m-2·s-1), and the maximum biomass productivity they obtained was 0.5 g·L-1·d-1. In the 2 latter reports, productivities were much higher than those obtained in the present study.

Chlorella vulgaris tolerates high NH4 + concentrations. However, when NH4 + exceeds 110-130 mg·L-1, cell growth inhibition occurs (Sanz-Luque et al. 2015). The inhibition of microalgal growth caused by NH4 + becomes severe when the NH4 + content reaches 1,030.36 mg·L-1 (Park et al. 2010). In the present study, the NH4 + concentration in the medium was below 90.61 mg·L-1 (Table 4).

Lipid concentrations in cells increase when the source of nitrogen is limited (Eroglu et al. 2015, May Cua et al. 2019). N is a critical factor for regulating algal cell lipid content; lipid accumulation increases when nitrogen becomes the growth limiting factor (Chen et al. 2011). However, N limitation minimizes algal growth; the 2 conditions of high lipid content and high algal productivity are mutually exclusive.

Nam et al. (2017) cultivated C. vulgaris in residual water of pig excreta with a total N concentration of 307.2 mg·L-1 for 16 d, obtaining a biomass and lipid concentration of 3.96 and 1.072 g·L-1, respectively. In the present work, the production of biomass and lipids was approximately 61% and 72% lower in PEM, respectively, with total N concentration being ~5 times lower (Fig. 1). In the case of Ww, the concentration of biomass and lipids was of 58% and 68% lower, respectively, and the total N concentration was 9 times lower. Regarding BM, the production of biomass and lipids was 54% and 85% lower, respectively, having the same total N concentration as PEM.

The loss of NH4 + can be caused by several factors, such as assimilation by microalgae, denitrification processes by bacteria, and NH4 + stripping at high pH levels in the medium. In the case of P, the removal is due to assimilation by microalgae and precipitation in the form of calcium phosphate at pH levels close to 9 (Walker 2015). In this study, the initial pH of Ww and BM was 8.5 and it increased during the growth of the consortium and Scenedesmus sp., reaching a value of 11.5.

The preference for the type of N source varies from one strain of microalgae to another. NH4 + is the most easily assimilated N source, followed by NO3 - and NO2 -. NH4 + is directly assimilated by the cell, whereas NO2 - and NO3 - are transported to the inner part of the cell and reduced to NH4 + by nitrite and nitrate reductases (Liao et al. 2018). In Ww, PEM, and PDM the concentration of NO3 - was up to twice the initial one (Table 4). The processes of N removal in wastewater and activated sludge, the nitrification of NH4 +, which is oxidized to NO3 -, and the denitrification of NO3 -, which is reduced to N2, have been widely studied (Larsdotter 2006). These processes involve nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria: the former are autotrophic, do not need organic carbon, and consume large amounts of oxygen; the latter are anaerobic heterotrophs or aerobic autotrophs and require a source of carbon. The first step in the nitrification process is the oxidation of NH4 + to NO2 - by bacteria belonging to the genus Nitrosomonas. In the second step, the oxidation of NO2 - to NO3 - occurs by bacteria belonging to the genus Nitrobacter. In denitrification, bacteria reduce NO3 - or NO2 - to N2 gas (Jia and Yuan 2016). In mixed cultures of microalgae and bacteria in wastewater, microalgae can produce organic compounds that bacteria can assimilate; on the other hand, some bacteria produce hormones that promote microalgal growth (Liu et al. 2017). Approximately 60% of NH4 + is oxidized by nitrifying bacteria, while microalgae assimilate 40% (Vargas et al. 2016).

High pH levels can promote NH3 volatilization (removal of NH4-N) and P removal through PO4 3- precipitation with ferric iron, calcium, and magnesium (Park et al. 2011). In PDM, a medium in which greater ammonium loss due to volatilization was observed, pH values were more basic than in PEM; in addition, PEM contained a higher quantity of organic matter that could have minimized NH3 losses. For example, Wu et al. (2017) reported losses of 5% of NH4 + by stripping during 4 d in wastewater without microalgae (initial concentration of 30.26 mg·L-1 NH4 +).

The present study demonstrated that the cultivation of the microalgal consortium and Scenedesmus sp. with piggery wastewater as the medium is suitable to produce biodiesel given the productivity of biomass and lipids and the high content of saturated fatty acids that were obtained. These productivities were reached due to the nutrient supply attributed to piggery wastewater, which in addition is readily available. Furthermore, cultivation with PEM showed efficient nutrient removal within the first 3 d. As a whole, the results of the present study provide insight on low-cost alternatives to culture microalgae, coupled with valorization of waste as an approach to the eventual production of biodiesel.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Instituto Politécnico Nacional (SIP 20180825 and SIP 20195715-20195732) and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Mexico; grant No. 247402).

References

Acién FG, Fernández JM, Magán JJ, Molina E. 2012. Production cost of a real microalgae production plant and strategies to reduce it. Biotechnol Adv. 30(6):1344-1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.005 [ Links ]

Anand G, Pandey JK, Rana S. 2018. Nanotechnology for Energy and Water: Proceedings of the International Conference NEW-2017; 2017; Dehradun (India). Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing AG. [ Links ]

[APHA] American Public Health Association. 1998. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA. p. 5-16. [ Links ]

[APHA] American Public Health Association. 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA . [ Links ]

Boelee NC, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman CJN, Wijffels RH. 2011. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater effluent using microalgal biofilms. Water Res. 45(18):5925-5933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.044 [ Links ]

Chen M, Tang H, Ma H, Holland TC, Ng KYS, Salley SO. 2011. Effect of nutrients on growth and lipid accumulation in the green algae Dunaliella tertiolecta. Bioresour Technol. 102(2):1649-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.062 [ Links ]

Chisti Y. 2013. Constraints to commercialization of algal fuels. J Biotechnol. 167(3):201-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.07.020 [ Links ]

Dickinson KE, Whitney CG, McGinn PJ. 2013. Nutrient remediation rates in municipal wastewater and their effect on biochemical composition of the microalga Scenedesmus sp. AMDD. Algal Res. 2(2):127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2013.01.009 [ Links ]

DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 28(3):350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017 [ Links ]

El Shimi HI, Moustafa SS. 2017. Biodiesel production from microalgae grown on domestic wastewater: Feasibility and egyptian case study. 82(3):4238-4244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.073 [ Links ]

Eroglu E, Smith SM, Raston CL. 2015. Appication of various immobilization techniques for algal bioprocesses. In: Moheimani NR, McHenry MP, de Boer K, Bahri PA (eds.), Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies 2- Biomass and Biofuels from Microalgae. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 19-44. [ Links ]

Gómez C, Escudero R, Morales MM, Figueroa FL, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Acién FG. 2013. Use of secondary-treated wastewater for the production of Muriellopsis sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 97(5):2239-2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4634-7 [ Links ]

Gonçalves AL, Pires JCM, Simões M. 2017. A review on the use of microalgal consortia for wastewater treatment. Algal Res . 24(B):403-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.008 [ Links ]

Hernández-García A, Velásquez-Orta SB, Novelo E, Yáñez-Noguez I, Monje-Ramírez I, Orta-Ledesma MT. 2019. Wastewater-leachate treatment by microalgae: Biomass, carbohydrate and lipid production. Ecotox Environ Safe. 174:435-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.052 [ Links ]

Hillier J, Hawes C, Squire G, Hilton A, Wale S, Smith P. 2009. The carbon footprints of food crop production. Int J Agr Sustain. 7(2):107-118. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0419 [ Links ]

Ho S-H, Chen Y-D, Qu W-Y, Liu F-Y, Wang Y. 2019. Algal culture and biofuel production using wastewater. In: Pandey A, Chang JD, Chisti Y (eds.), Biofuels from Algae. 2nd ed. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier B.V. 603 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64192-2.00008-1 [ Links ]

Hu B, Zhou W, Min M, Du Z, Chen P, Ma X, Liu Y, Lei H, Shi J, Ruan R. 2013. Development of an effective acidogenically digested swine manure-based algal system for improved wastewater treatment and biofuel and feed production. Appl Ener. 107:255-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.033 [ Links ]

Huy M, Kumar G, Kim H-W, Kim S-H. 2018. Photoautotrophic cultivation of mixed microalgae consortia using various organic waste streams towards remediation and resource recovery. Bioresource Technol. 247:576-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.108 [ Links ]

Ji M-K, Abou-Shanab RAI, Hwang J-H, Timmes TC. 2013. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from piggery wastewater effluent using the green microalga Scenedesmus obliquus. J Environ Eng. 139(9):1198-1205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000726 [ Links ]

Jia H, Yuan Q. 2016. Removal of nitrogen from wastewater using microalgae and microalgae-bacteria consortia. Cogent Environmental Science. 2(1):1275089. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2016.1275089 [ Links ]

Keeney DR, Nelson DW. 1982. Nitrogen-Inorganic Forms. In: Page AL (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Agronomy Monograph 9, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy. 643-698. [ Links ]

Lam MK, Yusoff MI, Uemura Y, Lim JW, Khoo CG, Lee KT, Ong HC. 2017. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris using nutrients source from domestic wastewater for biodiesel production: Growth condition and kinetic studies. Renew Energ. 103:197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.032 [ Links ]

Larsdotter K. 2006. Wastewater treatment with microalgae-A literature review. Vatten. 62:31-38. [ Links ]

Liao Q, Chang J-S, Herrmann C, Xia A. 2018. Bioreactors for microbial biomass and energy conversion. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7677-0 [ Links ]

Liu J, Wu Y, Wu C, Muylaert K, Vyverman W, Yu H-Q, Muñoz R, Rittmann B. 2017. Advanced nutrient removal from surface water by a consortium of attached microalgae and bacteria: A review. Bioresource Technol . 241:1127-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.054 [ Links ]

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193(1):265-275. [ Links ]

Lu Y, Xu J. 2015. Phytohormones in microalgae: a new opportunity for microalgal biotechnology? Trends Plant Sci. 20(5):273-282.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.006 [ Links ]

Luo L, He H, Yang C, Wen S, Zeng G, Wu M, Zhou Z, Lou W. 2016. Nutrient removal and lipid production by Coelastrella sp. in anaerobically and aerobically treated swine wastewater. Bioresource Technol . 216:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.059 [ Links ]

May-Cua ER, Toledano-Thompson T, Alzate-Gaviria LM, Barahona-Perez LF. 2019. A cylindrical-conical photobioreactor and a sludge drying bed as an efficient system for cultivation of the green microalgae Coelastrum sp. and dry biomass recovery. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química. 18(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/revmexingquim/2019v18n1/may [ Links ]

Metz B, Meyer L, Bosch P. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

Morales-Amaral MM, Gómez-Serrano C, Acién FG, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Molina-Grima E. 2015. Production of microalgae using centrate from anaerobic digestion as the nutrient source. Algal Res . 9:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.018 [ Links ]

Nam K, Lee H, Hoe S-W, Chang YK, Han JI. 2017. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris with swine wastewater and potential for algal biodiesel production. J Appl Phycol. 29(3):1171-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0987-0 [ Links ]

Nayak M, Thirunavoukkarasu M, Mohanty RC. 2016. Cultivation of freshwater microalga Scenedesmus sp. using a low-cost inorganic fertilizer for enhanced biomass and lipid yield. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 62(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.62.7 [ Links ]

Park J, Jin H-F, Lim B-R, Park K-Y, Lee K. 2010. Ammonia removal from anaerobic digestion effluent of livestock waste using green alga Scenedesmus sp. Bioresource Technol . 101(22):8649-8657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.142 [ Links ]

Park JBK, Craggs RJ, Shilton AN. 2011. Wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds for biofuel production. Bioresource Technol . 102(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.158 [ Links ]

Ramírez-López C, Chairez I, Fernandez-Linares L, 2016. A novel culture medium designed for the simultaneous enhancement of biomass and lipid production by Chlorella vulgaris UTEX 26. Bioresour Technol . 212:207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.051 [ Links ]

Ritchie RJ. 2006. Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents. Photosynth Res. 89(1):27-41. [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Mata AE, Flores-Colunga G, Rangel-Peraza JG, Lizardi-Jiménez MA, Amabilis-Sosa LE. 2019. Estimation of states in photosynthetic systems via chained observers: Design for a tertiary wastewater treatment by using Spirulina maxima on photobioreactor. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniera Quimica. 18(1):273-87. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/revmexingquim/2019v18n1/rodriguez [ Links ]

Sanz-Luque E, Chamizo-Ampudia A, Llamas A, Galvan A, Fernandez E. 2015. Understanding nitrate assimilation and its regulation in microalgae. Front Plant Sci. 6:899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00899 [ Links ]

Vargas G, Donoso-Bravo A, Vergara C, Ruiz-Filippi G. 2016. Assessment of microalgae and nitrifiers activity in a consortium in a continuous operation and the effect of oxygen depletion. Electron J Biotechn. 23:63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.08.002 [ Links ]

Walker HW. 2015. Harmful Algae Blooms in Drinking Water: Removal of Cyanobacterial Cells and Toxins. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. [ Links ]

Wang M, Yang Y, Chen Z, Chen Y, Wen Y, Chen B. 2016a. Removal of nutrients from undiluted anaerobically treated piggery wastewater by improved microalgae. Bioresource Technol . 222:130-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.128 [ Links ]

Wang Y, Ho S-H, Cheng C-L, Guo W-Q, Nagarajan D, Ren N-Q, Lee D-J, Chang J-S. 2016b. Perspectives on the feasibility of using microalgae for industrial wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technol . 222:485-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.106 [ Links ]

Wu K-C, Yau Y-H, Ho K-C. 2017. Capability of microalgae for local saline sewage treatment towards biodiesel production. IOP Conf Series. Earth Env Sci. 82:012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/82/1/012008 [ Links ]

Xu J, Zhao Y, Zhao G, Zhang H. 2015. Nutrient removal and biogas upgrading by integrating freshwater algae cultivation with piggery anaerobic digestate liquid treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol . 99(15):6493-6501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6537-x [ Links ]

Received: April 13, 2020; Accepted: September 25, 2020

*Corresponding author. E-mail: lfernand36@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License