SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número2Flujos de carbono agua-aire en la zona de surgencias costeras frente al norte de Baja California índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Ciencias marinas

versão impressa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.41 no.2 Ensenada Jun. 2015

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v41i2.2483 

Articles

Nutrient input from the Colorado River to the northern Gulf of California is not required to maintain a productive pelagic ecosystem

El aporte de nutrientes del río Colorado al norte del golfo de California no se requiere para mantener un ecosistema pelágico productivo

Mario Rafael Ramírez-León1 

Saúl Álvarez-Borrego1  *  

Cuauhtémoc Turrent Thompson2 

Gilberto Gaxiola Castro3 

Gisela Heckel Dziendzielewski4 

1Departamento de Ecología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Ensenada, CP 22860, Baja California, México.

2Departamento de Oceanografía Física, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Ensenada, CP 22860, Baja California, México.

3Departamento de Oceanografía Biológica, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Ensenada, CP 22860, Baja California, México.

4Departamento de Biología de la Conservación, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Ensenada, CP 22860, Baja California, México.


ABSTRACT

The high phytoplankton production (PP) of the northern Gulf of California (NGC) supports a rich biodiversity and fisheries with high yields. The NGC is the habitat of the vaquita (Phocoena sinus), the cetacean most at risk of extinction in the world. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the NGC is a healthy system at the level of primary producers despite the lack of nutrient input from the Colorado River, and that the small size of the vaquita population is not attributable the collapse of its pelagic ecosystem. Information derived from satellite sensors (CZCS, SeaWiFS, and Aqua-MODIS) was used to explore the possibility of a negative tendency in phytoplankton biomass and PP in the NGC during the last ~35 years. Temporal and spatial variations in sea surface temperature (SSTsat), chlorophyll concentration (Chlsat), and PP were analyzed. Times series were generated for four coastal quadrants, two in the western part and two in the eastern part of the NGC. The NW quadrant covers the vaquita habitat, and it had higher Chlsat and PP values than the others. This may be due to advection of turbid Upper Gulf waters into the NW quadrant. Semiannual and interannual changes in Chlsat and PP occurred, but the seasonal signal was dominant in the whole region. SSTsat maxima occurred in August and September (30-31 °C) and minima in January and February (16-17 °C). Chlsat andPP maxima were recorded in March and April (2-3 mg m-3, 2-3 g C m-2 day-1, respectively) and minima in August and September (0.2-0.9 mg m-3, 0.5-1.1 g C m-2 day-1, respectively). These values indicate that the pelagic ecosystem of the NGC is very productive (mesotrophic in summer-autumn and eutrophic in winter-spring).

Key words: phytoplankton biomass; primary production; northern Gulf of California

RESUMEN

La alta producción fitoplanctónica (PF) del norte del golfo de California (NGC) sustenta una gran biodiversidad y pesquerías con capturas elevadas. El NGC es el hábitat de la vaquita (Phocoena sinus), el cetáceo que se encuentra en mayor peligro de extinción en el mundo. El objetivo de este estudio es demostrar que el NGC es un sistema sano en el ámbito de los productores primarios a pesar de la falta del aporte de nutrientes del río Colorado, y que el tamaño pequeño de la población de la vaquita no se debe al colapso de su ecosistema pelágico. Se utilizó información satelital (CZCS, SeaWiFS y Aqua-MODIS) con el propósito de explorar la posibilidad de una tendencia negativa de la biomasa y producción fitoplanctónicas en el NGC en los últimos ~35 años. Se analizó la variación espaciotemporal de la temperatura superficial del mar (TSMsat), la concentración de clorofila (Chlsat) y PF. Se generaron series de tiempo para cuatro cuadrantes, dos en la parte occidental y dos en la parte oriental del NGC. El cuadrante noroccidental abarca el hábitat de la vaquita y presentó valores de Chlsat y PF más altos que el resto de los cuadrantes. Esto puede deberse a la advección de aguas turbias del Alto Golfo hacia el cuadrante noroccidental. Se observaron cambios semianuales e interanuales de Chlsat y PF, pero los estacionales fueron dominantes en las cuatro localidades. Los máximos de TSMsat se registraron en agosto y septiembre (30-31 °C) y los mínimos en enero y febrero (16-17 °C). Los máximos de Chlsat y PF se registraron en marzo y abril (2-3 mg m-3, 2-3 g C m-2 día-1, respectivamente) y los mínimos en agosto y septiembre (0.2-0.9 mg m-3, 0.5-1.1 g C m-2 día-1, respectivamente). Estos valores de Chlsat y PF indican que el NGC es muy productivo (mesotrófico en verano-otoño y eutrófico en invierno-primavera).

Palabras clave: biomasa fitoplanctónica; producción primaria; norte del golfo de California

Introduction

The Gulf of California is one of the world's most productive marine ecosystems. It is an eutrophic system with an integrated phytoplankton production (PP) of >1 g C m-2 day-1 and in some places >4 g C m-2 day-1 (Álvarez-Borrego and Lara-Lara 1991). Average PP for the whole gulf is ~300 g C m-2 year-1 (Escalante et al. 2013). Considering the shallow isograms of 45 µmol L-1 dissolved oxygen, 2.5 µM phosphate (PO4), and 20 µM nitrate (NO3), with depths ranging from 50 m to little more than 100 m in the northern Gulf of California (NGC), the gulf's upwelling areas must be among the most productive. These nutrient-rich waters reach the euphotic zone by means of dynamic processes, mainly upwelling and mixing by tidal currents and winds. Surface nutrient concentrations in the NGC may be as high as 1.0 µM PO4, 4.0 µM NO3, and 18 µM H4SiO4 (Álvarez-Borrego et al. 1978).

The main natural fertilization mechanisms of the Gulf of California are water exchange with the Pacific, upwelling along the eastern coast, and mixing by tidal currents. Other phenomena, such as mesoscale meanders and eddies, also input nutrients to the euphotic zone, but their effect is more local. The net input of NO3 from the Pacific into the gulf has been estimated at 117 x 109 mol yr-1 on average, and it is transported to the euphotic zone by upwelling, tidal mixing, etc. This input is much greater than the nutrient input by rivers, which is almost null because of the construction of dams and it has only very local effects (Álvarez-Borrego and Giles-Guzmán 2012).

Seasonality in the Gulf of California is well defined. There are two seasons: "winter", with northwesterly winds, from December through May; and "summer", with southeast erly winds, from July through October, with June and November as transition months. This seasonal cycle has a strong effect on the phytoplankton biomass and PP (Hidalgo- González and Álvarez-Borrego 2004, Kahru et al. 2004). This is mainly because of the effect of winter upwelling on phytoplankton communities, which is much greater than that of summer upwelling. Surface chlorophyll concentrations (Chl) greater than 10 mg m-3 have been reported for some eastern regions of the gulf, and because of mesoscale eddy circulation these high concentrations are found across the gulf (Santamaría-del-Ángel et al. 1994a). On the other hand, summer upwelling off the peninsula has a weak impact because of the strong stratification caused by high surface temperatures, resulting in a small Chl increment (up to ~0.5 mg m-3) (Santamaría-del-Ángel et al. 1999), and because surface flow direction is opposite that of the wind (Lluch-Cota 2000).

The NGC is the shallowest gulf region, with an average depth of ~200 m. It is one of the regions with highest PP, with Chl concentrations of up to 40 mg m-3, estimated from in situ sampling, and >10 mg m-3, estimated from satellite data (Gendrop-Funes et al. 1978, Santamaría-del-Ángel et al. 1994a). In situ PP data (point estimates, with 14C incubations) for the NGC are scarce, but some values are as high as 2.3gC m-2 day-1 (Álvarez-Borrego and Lara-Lara 1991). Hidalgo-González and Álvarez-Borrego (2004) used satellite data to estimate average PP values for the whole NGC of 61 g C m-2 day-1 for winter and of 0.43 g C m-2 day-1 for summer. The NGC serves as a reproduction and nursery ground for many invertebrate species, marine mammals, and birds. Its high PP sustains a rich biodiversity consisting of 544 vertebrate and 2258 invertebrate species, of which ~147 are endemic; all together, they represent 47% of the diversity of the entire Gulf of California (Brusca et al. 2005).

Sea bass, sardine, and several shrimp species are the main fishery resources of the NGC. The shrimp trawl fishery is one of the most profitable (Cisneros-Mata 2010); however, this fishery has been responsible for the overharvesting of several species because the shrimp bycatch is ~10 t for each ton of captured shrimp. This bycatch is mainly composed of juveniles of several species. The shrimp fishery has decreased the biodiversity of benthic communities and it has modified the substrate (Carvajal et al. 2010).

The Biosphere Reserve of the Upper Gulf of California and Colorado River Delta was established by federal decree in 1993. Its original purpose was to protect the vaquita (Phocoena sinus ) but a large fraction of its habitat falls outside the reserve. This species is in critical danger. The vaquita's distribution is restricted to 4000 km2 in the northwestern NGC (around 30°45'N, 114°20'W) (Rojas-Bracho et al. 2006). A refuge area for the vaquita of 1263 km2 was decreed in 2005, but it was extended to 11,000 km2 in April 2015.

Over the past three decades controversy has arisen between the fisheries and conservation sectors regarding the management and conservation of the vaquita, because of the ecological problems generated by the fishing activities in this region (Brusca et al. 2005). The hypothesis of the fisheries sector is that the vaquita population has decreased because the lack of freshwater from the Colorado River has negatively impacted the NGC's ecosystem. This hypothesis establishes that with no freshwater there is no nutrient input into the NGC and PP has decreased (Galindo-Bect et al. 2000), causing the pelagic ecosystem to collapse. Yet, there is no proof that nutrient concentrations have diminished significantly, there are no data showing that PP has decreased, and apparently the low nutrient input is not a risk factor for the vaquita in the short term. On the other hand, it has been documented that the vaquita population decline is mainly caused by fishing activities (Rojas-Bracho and Taylor 1999).

The objective of this contribution is to show that the vaquita habitat, and the whole NGC, is a healthy ecosystem in relation to its primary producers (Chl >1 mg m-3) and that there is no collapse of the pelagic ecosystem because of the lack of nutrients previously supplied by the Colorado River. Several contributions based on satellite data have described the spatial and temporal variation in phytoplankton biomass and PP of the Gulf of California (Hidalgo-González and Álvarez-Borrego 2004, Herrera-Cervantes et al. 2010, and others cited therein); however, there are no studies describing the details of the large-scale spatial and temporal variation in phytoplankton biomass and PP (synoptic studies) for the NGC. In this contribution we aim to answer the following question: Based on the phytoplankton biomass and PP, is the pelagic ecosystem of the NGC healthy enough to sustain populations of marine mammals such as the vaquita?

Materials and methods

Satellite data

The satellite-derived Chl a (Chlsat) is the Chl(z) averaged for the first optical depth (the upper 22% of the euphotic zone), weighted by the irradiance attenuated twice (when the light is going down and when it is back-scattered up) (Kirk 1994). Monthly composites of day sea surface temperature (SST) and Chlsat were obtained from the NASA website (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/) (level 3 standard mapped image products, 9 x 9 km2 pixel size). PP monthly composites were retrieved as a standard product from the Oregon State University (OSU) Ocean Productivity site (http:// www.science.oregonstate.edu/ocean.productivity/index.php). This website provides PP already calculated with the original Behrenfeld and Falkowsky (1997) vertically generalized production model (VGPM). The VGPM is a non-spectral, homogeneous-biomass vertical distribution, vertically integrated production model.

Data from the CZCS, SeaWiFS, and Aqua-MODIS sensors were used. Chlsat data were retrieved from all three sensors, but SST and PP were only derived from aqua-MODIS. Satellite imagery was processed with software provided by NASA (SeaWIFS Data Analysis System, SeaDAS 7.0.2) (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/seadas/). To study possible spatial differences of water properties (SST, Chlsat, and PP), four quadrants were chosen, two in the western (NW and SW) and two in the eastern (NE and SE) parts of the NGC. Each quadrant covered 2025 km2 (5 pixels of 9 x 9 km2 on each side; a total of 25 pixels). The NW quadrant coincides approximately with the vaquita habitat. Also, a quadrant at Guaymas Basin was chosen, where there should be no effect of the lack of river water and nutrient input, to compare the temporal behavior of Chlsat data from the three sensors (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Study area. Location of the four quadrants in the northern Gulf of California and of the Guaymas Basin (GB) quadrant. RHV, vaquita habitat range. 

Time series of SST, Chlsat, and PP were generated for each quadrant (averages of 25 values per quadrant, per monthly composite). The study period for SST was July 2002 to June 2013, with Aqua-MODIS data. Three time series were generated for Chlsat: November 1978 to June 1986, with CZCS data; September 1997 to December 2010, with SeaWiFS data; and July 2002 to June 2013, with Aqua-MODIS data. The study period for PP was July 2002 to June 2013, with Aqua-MODIS data. The spectral analysis of time series was performed using Welch's (1967) periodograms method . To apply this method, low frequencies (interannual variations) were eliminated to filter long-term variation tendencies. As a first approximation to the climatology, an "average yeaf' was generated for each variable and for each quadrant. In the case of Chlsat, this was also done for each sensor. To do this, data from all Januaries were taken to obtain the "average January" for each variable and for each quadrant, and so on for all months. To generate a true climatology, data from at least 30 years are needed.

Models to estimate phytoplankton productivity

Kahru et al. (2009) and Álvarez-Molina et al. (2013) reported that the PP values from OSU's Ocean Productivity page (PPOSU) calculated with the VGPM are overestimated by as much as 50%. To corroborate this, 40 Aqua-MODIS Chlsat data were chosen at random (10 from each quadrant), and independent PP estimates were performed to compare them with PPOSU. Platt et al.'s (1991) model, as modified by Hidalgo-González and Álvarez-Borrego (2004), was used to calculate these independent PP values. Platt et al.'s (1991) model considers a non-homogeneous Chl vertical distribution that takes into account the deep Chl maximum. Hidalgo- González and Álvarez-Borrego (2004) applied this model to case I waters (Chl <1.5 mg m-3) and case II waters (Chl > 1.5 mg m-3). For case II waters, Platt et al.'s (1991) original model was used. This is a non-spectral model that estimates PP without taking into consideration the change of light quality with depth (eq. 1):

where P* m is the maximum photosynthetic rate at optimum light, normalized per unit Chl, in mg C mg Chl-1 h-1; α*PAR(z) is the initial slope of the photosynthesis-irradiance relationship (P-E curve), in mg C mg Chl-1 h-1 (µmol quanta m-2 s-1)-1; and PAR is the photosynthetically active radiation, in µmol quanta m-2 s-1. Integration of equation 1 with depth provides PPPS. For case I waters, the model was modified with Giles-Guzman and Alvarez-Borrego's (2000) expression for the chlorophyll-specific absorption coefficient of phytoplankton (ā* ph( z Chl )). This modification corrects the initial slope of the photosynthesis-irradiance relationship for the spectral distribution of in situ scalar PAR and for the package effect. The expression 43.2 Ф max a*p h(z Chl) is used instead of the initial slope αPAR(z) (eq. 2). The factor 43.2 converts mol C to mg C, seconds to hours, and mol quanta to µmol quanta; Фmax is the maximum photosynthetic quantum yield at low irradiance in mol C (mol quanta)-1; and a* ph (z Chl) is the weighted average of the specific absorption coefficient of phytoplankton, in m2 (mg Chl)-1, where the weighting factor is the shape of the spectral distribution of in situ PAR (Giles- Guzman and Alvarez-Borrego 2000):

Integration of equation 2 with depth provides PPGGAB. Equations 1 and 2 show that, to calculate PP, vertical profiles of Chl(z) and PAR are needed, not only the surface values (Hidalgo-Gonzalez and Alvarez-Borrego 2004). The Chl(z) vertical profiles were generated from Chlsat and the Gaussian model proposed by Platt et al. (1991), using the parameters reported by Hidalgo-Gonzalez and Alvarez-Borrego (2001) for the NGC (their winter region IV and summer region 2). Monthly Aqua-MODIS composites for PAR incident on the sea surface (PAR0) were used. This PAR0 is the integral for the whole day (daylight hours), also called diurnal insolation Q, and it is expressed as Einstein m-2 day-1 (one Einstein is one mole photons, it is Avogadro's number of photons = 6.022 x 1023 quanta). These values were transformed to µmol quanta m-2 day-1. PAR for noon is PARm = Qπ/2N, where N is the daylight in seconds. PAR incident on the surface for each hour is PAR(t) = PARm sin(πt/N), where t is time in seconds from sunrise (Kirk 1994). PAR(z) profiles for case I waters were generated following Giles-Guzman and Alvarez- Borrego (2000), and for case II waters they were generated following Cervantes-Duarte et al. (2000). Valdez-Holguin et al.'s (1999) values for the photosynthetic parameters (P*m {z) , αPAR(Z) , and Ф max) were used. PP was calculated for each morning hour and multiplied by two to obtain PP for the whole day (symmetry of PAR and constancy of Chlw were assumed for the day).

Statistical analysis

The distributions of the three variables (SST, Chlsat, and PP) were not normal. Thus, non-parametric tests were run to search for spatial and temporal differences. The year was divided into winter and summer, following Hidalgo-Gonzalez and Alvarez-Borrego (2004), and a Mann-Whitney U test for two independent variables was performed to search for differences between seasons. To search for interannual differences, the winter averages for all years were compared by a Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple independent variables, and the same was done for the summer averages. An a posteriori test was run to establish which winters and which summers were significantly different from the others. To search for spatial differences, a Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple independent variables was run separately with winter and with summer averages to compare quadrants. Also, an a posteriori test was run to establish which quadrants were significantly different from the others.

A linear regression was run with Chlsat data from each winter month as the dependent variable and the years as the independent variable, to search for a long-term significant negative tendency, separately for data from each sensor. The same was done for PPOSU. A linear regression was performed between SeaWiFS and Aqua-Modis Chlsat data from overlapping years (July 2002 to December 2010) in order to analyze the between-sensors consistency and explore the possibility of using data from them as a single time series. A linear regression was run between PPOSU and PPps to test for a significant difference between the slope and the slope for the 45° line (1.0). The same was done for PPOSU and PPGGAB.

Results

The SST values for the NGC presented a very clear annual oscillation (15-31 °C). The time series for the four quadrants showed very similar SST values. SST minima occurred in February and March, and maxima in August and September (Fig. 2a). The differences between the summer and winter SST values were significant (Mann-Whitney U test: n = 436, z = -17.72, P < 0.001). The highest winter mean SST was 19.98 ± 0.75 °C (in this and all following cases the number after ± is the standard error, s/n05) in the SW quad rant in 2002-2003; the differences with the winter mean SST values for the other quadrants were smaller than the standard error. The winter of 2010-2011 had the lowest mean SST, with 18.4 ± 0.86 °C in the SE quadrant. On the other hand, .the lowest summer mean SST was 28.87 ± 0.78 °C in the NE quadrant in 2002, whereas the summer of 2012 was the warmest, with 30.75 ± 0.76 °C in the NW quadrant. However, SST did not present a significant interannual variation. Winter SST values showed no significant differences between years (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 260, H = 13.41, P = 0.20), and neither did the summer SST values (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 176, H = 14.09, P = 0.16). The spectral analysis showed that the seasonal cycle explained most of the SST variability in all four quadrants. This signal was the only significant one (Fig. 2b). The four spectra are very similar, and show a very small, but not significant maximum in the semiannual cycle.

Figure 2 Sea surface temperature (°C). (a) Time series of data from the NW quadrant: the standard error is smaller than the symbols and the marks on the horizontal axis indicate the beginning of the year. (b) Spectral density of data from the NW quadrant: the continuous line is the average and the broken line marks the limits at the 95% confidence level. (c) Average year for the NW quadrant. 

In relation to the approximation to the climatology, the mean SST for February was the lowest, with 16.51 ± 0.23 °C in the NW quadrant, and the mean for August was the high est, with 31.31 ± 0.12 °C also in the NW quadrant (Fig. 2c). There were no significant differences between quadrants in both seasons (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 260, H = 0.56, P = 0.90 for winter; and n = 176, H = 5.74, P = 0.12 for summer).

The time series from the three sensors show a clear difference between winter and summer Chlsat values in the NGC (Figs. 3, 4 ). Chlsat showed components of seasonal and between-year variation during the 1978-1986 period (CZCS). The CZCS composites, unlike the imagery from the other sensors, often lacked data for the NW quadrant (Figs. 3, 4 ). In general, the NW quadrant had the highest mean Chlsat values and the SE quadrant the lowest. The CZCS time series for the four quadrants showed a very clear seasonal variation (0.4 to 5 mg m-3), with minimum values in summer and maximum in winter. There were significant differences between the summer and winter Chlsat values (Mann-Whitney U test: n = 256, z = 9.83, P < 0.001). Besides the seasonal and interannual variations, Chlsat had a semiannual variation that can be seen as a secondary maximum in the time series for the four quadrants. This other maximum was much smaller than the one for winter and was (CZCS). A diferencia de las imágenes de los otros sensores, las del CZCS tuvieron muchos vacíos en el cuadrante NW (Fig. 3, 4 ). En general, el cuadrante NW presentó los valores promedio de Chlsat más altos y el SE los más bajos. Las series de tiempo del CZCS de los cuatro cuadrantes presentaron una observed more clearly in the NW quadrant than in the others. It occurred in different times of different years, between the end of summer and end of autumn, and sometimes instead of a peak it was a shoulder (Figs. 3, 4 ).

Figure 3 Time series of CZCS Chlsat data for the four quadrants, for the period 1978-1986: (a) NW, (b) NE, (c) SW, and (d) SE. Vertical bars show the standard error. Marks on the horizontal axis indicate the beginning of the year. 

Figure 4 Time series of Chlsat data from SeaWiFS (continuous line) and Aqua-MODIS (broken line) for the four quadrants, for the 1997-2013 period: (a) NW, (b) NE, (c) SW, and (d) SE. Vertical bars show the standard error. Marks on the horizontal axis indicate the beginning of the year. 

The internannual differences between the CZCS Chlsat values for the winter months were significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 167, H = 31.66, P < 0.001). The winter of 1981-1982 had the highest mean Chlsat, with 8.46 ± 2.95 mg m-3 in the NE quadrant, although differences between quadrants were smaller than the standard error. The winter of 1984-1985 had the lowest, with 1.7 ± 0.04 mg m-3 in the NW quadrant, again without significant differences between quadrants. On the other hand, the internannual differences between the CZCS Chlsat values for the summer months were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 89, H = 12.88, P >0.05).

The SeaWiFS and Aqua-MODIS Chlsat time series behaved very similar to the CZCS time series, with semiannual, annual, and interannual variations; however, when both sensors overlapped, the Aqua-MODIS winter Chlsat values were higher than those from SeaWiFS, while the summer Chlsat values from both sensors were similar (Fig. 4). Linear regression analysis was performed for SeaWiFS vs Aqua- MODIS Chlsat with data from the period when both sensors operated at the same time, in order to decide on whether it was appropriate to use both data sets as a single time series. The regression had a slope of 0.73 ± 0.014 and r 2 = 0.88 using all data. Separating the data into case I waters (Chlsat <1.5 mg m-3) and case II waters (Chlsat > 1.5 mg m-3), the regression for case I waters had a slope of 0.86 ± 0.017 and r2 = 0.9, while that for case II waters had a slope of 0.21 ± 0.66 and r2 = 0.11. In general, in both cases, the Aqua- MODIS Chlsat data were higher than the SeaWiFS data, but they were very similar in the case of small Chlsat values, whereas in the case of large Chlsat values, the Aqua-MODIS data were higher and more scattered than the SeaWiFS data. Thus, both sets of data must be treated separately.

Comparing the SeaWiFS Chlsat values for the winter months, the interannual variation was significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 300, H = 23.28, P = 0.02). The lowest mean SeaWiFS Chlsat was 0.76 ± 0.06 mg m-3 in the SE quadrant in 1997-1998. The interannual variation of the SeaWiFS Chlsat values for the summer months was not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 205, H = 13.35, P = 0.42). Aqua-MODIS Chlsat values for the winter months did not show a significant interannual variation (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 264, H = 12.80, P = 0.23), with the same result for the interannual variation of the summer months (n = 176, H =9.26, P = 0.50).

The NW quadrant Chlsat values were higher than those of the other three quadrants throughout the time series from the three sensors (for CZCS data, Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 89, H = 14.5, P = 0.0023; and similar for data from the other sensors). The lowest Chlsat values were very similar in the other three quadrants. The difference between the NW quadrant and the other three is made clearer by the summer data. During the CZCS period, the lowest summer value for the NW quadrant was >1 mg m-3, whereas it was ~0.4 mg m-3 for the other quadrants. During the SeaWiFS and Aqua-MODIS periods, minimum summer Chlsat values were >0.9 mg m-3 for the NW quadrant, and they were 0.3-0.4 mg m-3 in the other quadrants. This Chlsat spatial variation was not clear for winter. Winter Chlsat data from CZCS and Aqua-MODIS showed no significant differences between quadrants (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 167, H = 2.46, P = 0.46; and n = 264, H = 6.4, P = 0.93, respectively), while those from SeaWiFS showed significant differences, with values for the NW quadrant higher than those for the other quadrants (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 300, H = 54.03, P <0.001).

The approximation to the Chlsat climatology in the NGC shows a very clear seasonal variation for the three sensors (Fig. 5a-b). The highest mean Chlsat values are those of March and April in the case of SeaWIFS and Aqua-MODIS, and those of February, November, and December in the case of CZCS. In all three cases, there are two maxima, but they were clearer in the CZCS climatology. Winter CZCS values were more than double those of the other two sensors. The lowest mean Chlsat values were observed in July, August, and September, and they were very similar for the three sensors. As a comparison, the climatology for Guaymas Basin also shows that the winter CZCS values are more than double those of the other sensors (Fig. 5c).

Figure 5 Approximation to the Chlsat climatology of the (a) NW and (b) SE quadrants in the northern Gulf of California and (c) Guaymas Basin quadrant. The broken line represents Aqua- MODIS data, the dotted line represents CZCS data, and the continuous line represents SeaWiFS data. 

Linear regression analysis to explore the possibility of a long-period Chlsat trend, run separately for each sensor and for each quadrant, resulted in low correlation coefficients and non-significant slopes (for the NW quadrant and for data from the three sensors: n = 31, F = 2.73, P = 0.11; n = 96, F = 0.35, P = 0.55; and n = 66, F = 1.10, P = 0.30, respectively for CZCS, SeaWIFS, and Aqua-MODIS). The spectral analysis showed a strong annual signal (seasonal cycle) that causes most of the Chlsat variability in the NGC. It also showed a Chlsat semiannual signal (two cycles per year), but smaller than the annual and only significant for data from Aqua- MODIS, at the 95% confidence level (Fig. 6a-b).

Figure 6 Spectral density of Chlsat for the NW quadrant: (a) SeaWiFS data and (b) Aqua-MODIS data. The continuous line is the average and the broken line marks the limits at the 95% confidence level. 

The NGC PP showed a spatial and temporal variability very similar to that of Chlsat, with a clear difference between winter and summer values (2002-2013 period) (Fig. 7a-b). Besides the seasonal variation, PP had a semiannual component, which was corroborated by the spectral analysis (Fig. 7c). The interannual variation was not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: n = 264, H = 11.67, P = 0.30 for winter; and n = 176, H = 9.27, P = 0.50 for summer). In general, the NW quadrant had the highest average PP, mainly in summer. In the first approximation to the PP climatology, March and April were the most productive, with ~3.3 ± 0.2 g C m-2 day-1. On the other hand, the period July-September was the least productive, with ~1.1 g C m-2 day-1 in the NW quadrant and 0.5-0.6 g C m-2 day-1 in the other quadrants (Fig. 7d).

Figure 7 Primary production. Time series for the (a) NW quadrant and (b) SE quadrant: vertical bars show the standard error and the marks on the horizontal axis indicate the beginning of the year. (c) Spectral density of data from the NW quadrant: the continuous line is the average and the broken line marks the limits at the 95% confidence level. (d) Average year for the NW quadrant. 

Of the 40 Chlsat and PAR data chosen at random to calculate PP using Platt et al.'s (1991) model, 28 were for case I waters and 12 were for case II waters. For case I waters, the slope of the PPOSU vs PPGGab relationship was 2.817 ± 0.008, thus PPOSU was up to ~3 times PPGGab. Linear regression analysis was statistically significant (n = 28, F = 90.53, P <0.001), with a relatively high correlation coefficient (r = 0.79) (Fig. 8a). For case II waters, the slope of the PPOSU vs PPPS relationship was 0.446 ± 1.233; thus, in general, PPOSU was smaller than PPPS (PPOSU was greater than PPPS only in two cases). Linear regression analysis, however, was not statistically significant (n = 12, F = 1.33, P = 0.274) (r = 0.42) (Fig. 8b).

Figure 8 Linear regression between primary productivity (PP) data from Oregon State University's Ocean Productivity website (PPOsu) and PP estimated with Platt et al.'s (1991) model for (a) case I waters and (b) case II waters. 

Discussion

The record of the Colorado River flow across the Mexico-Us border shows that before 1935, when the filling of Lake Mead (Hoover Dam) began, the freshwater that was discharged into the Uper Gulf had a seasonal modulation with peak discharges in June. After construction of the Glen Canyon Dam, input of Colorado River water to the Upper Gulf completely stopped (in 1961). During 1979-1987, water releases became necessary because of abnormal high precipitation and snowmelts in the upper river basin. Water releases also occurred in 1993 and 1997-2002 (Álvarez-Borrego 2002). Before the dams, there was a large interannual variation of river flow into the Upper Gulf, with a maximum of >32 x 109 m3 yr-1 and a minimum of <10 x 109 m3 yr-1 in the first 30 years of the 20th century. The largest water release in the period 1979-1987 was >15 x 109 m3 yr-1, similar to that of the river flowing freely.

When the Colorado River flowed freely, its influence was restricted to a few tens of kilometers to the southwest of the mouth, and was not felt throughout the whole NGC. Lavín and Sánchez (1999) reported that when the river flowed into the sea in 1993, the river plume with significantly mixed water only extended ~70 km southwestwards from the mouth, close to the peninsula. Rodríguez et al. (2001) used 18O in shells of a bivalve endemic to the Colorado River estuary (Mulinia coloradoensis Dall 1894) to reconstruct the river influence area before the construction of the dams and concluded that it extended to a maximum of ~80 km to the southwest of the mouth.

Nieto-García (1998) compared nutrient concentrations in the Upper Gulf in the spring of 1993 with those of spring 1996, when there was no water input from the Colorado River, and found that NO3 and PO4 concentrations were lower in 1993 than in 1996, and only silicate concentrations were higher in 1993. When comparing our Chlsat data for wet years with those of dry years, the differences were not signif icant. Thus, processes like mixing caused by tidal currents and coastal upwelling are causing the NGC to be productive, and nutrients from the Colorado River are not necessary to maintain its high PP.

Galindo-Bect et al. (2000) reported that higher shrimp catches landed in San Felipe were associated with river water discharges in the period 1976-1996, and a log-log regression with a one-year lag for the catches explained 45% of the variance. Aragón-Noriega and Calderón-Aguilera (2000) indicated that an important factor explaining the shrimp population increase is that expanded habitat (wetlands for shrimp larvae, postlarvae, and juveniles) is available when the Colorado River flow increases, because freshwater floods areas that are dry in those years when river discharge is null or too low. Furthermore, a commercial fishery for the Gulf corvina, Cynoscion othonopterus, a fish endemic to the Upper Gulf of California, existed from 1917 to 1940 but collapsed in the early 1960s. This collapse was attributed to fishing practices and the reduction in flow of the Colorado River into the Gulf of California, which supposedly reduced available nursery habitat for juveniles (Román-Rodríguez 2000)Nevertheless, the corvina fishery reappeared during the 1990s and continues to date (Aragón-Noriega 2014), in spite of the general lack of freshwater input to the Upper Gulf.

In general, the NGC has been considered a highly productive region. High winter Chlsat values ranging from 1 to >5 mg m-3 have been reported (Santamaría-del-Ángel etal. 1994a). Strictly, it is not appropriate to compare Chlsat and satellite-derived PP data with those from oceanographic cruises, because the two data sets have totally different time and space scales: satellite data are averages for 9 x 9 km2 areas and for one month, whereas data from oceanographic cruises are instantaneous point measurements. Nevertheless, the comparison is interesting. Winter Chl data generated during oceanographic cruises also ranged from 2 to >5 mg m-3, with very few values of up to 20 mg m-3 (Gendrop-Funes et al. 1978, Álvarez-Borrego and Gaxiola-Castro 1988, Gaxiola-Castro et al. 1995, Valdez-Holguín et al. 1995), similar in general to the Chlsat data presented in this study. Time series of Chl data generated from in situ sampling at sites close to the coast off San Felipe (Baja California) and Santa Clara (Sonora) show values <1.0 mg m-3 for September, values between ~1.5 and >5 mg m-3 for February, and values >20 mg m-3 for May (Álvarez-Borrego 2002), again similar to the Chlsat values presented here. Álvarez-Borrego and Lara-Lara (1991) reported only six 14C PP data points for the NGC, ranging from 0.6 to 2.3 g C m-2 day-1, with the highest values for June and lowest values for November. Álvarez- Borrego and Lara-Lara's (1991) low values agree with our summer values, but their high winter values are only about 70% of the satellite-derived PP values. Although point and instantaneous 14C PP data are extremely scarce, the comparison indicates that satellite-derived values might be overestimating PP.

The main source of interannual changes in the ocean climate of the Gulf of California is the El Niño influence (Baumgartner and Christensen 1985), and this also applies to Chlsat. The 1982-1983 El Niño, which affected the Gulf of California throughout 1984, and the 1997-1998 El Niño occurred during our study period (Santamaría-del-Ángel et al. 1994b, Hidalgo-González and Álvarez-Borrego 2004), both of the Eastern Pacific type. Santamaría-del-Ángel et al. (1994b) reported a decrease in Chlsat values for the winters of 1982-1983 and 1983-1984 relative to the 1981-1982 values, but they reported that the impact was not the same throughout the gulf. In the NGC and the region of the big islands, Chlsat differences between El Niño years and non-El Niño years were not significant, while differences were very clear for southern localities. Likewise, the effects of the 1997-1998 El Niño on the NGC were less evident than in the southern gulf (Hidalgo-González and Álvarez-Borrego 2004, Kahru et al. 2004). In this study, a significant decrease in Chlsat for the winter of 1983-1984 with respect to that for 1981-1982 is reported, due to the effect of El Niño, in spite of the large Colorado River water input of 1984. Also, this study reports a significant decrease in Chlsat values for the winter of 1997-1998 with respect to those for 1999-2000, for the four quadrants, because of the 1997-1998 El Niño, in agreement with the values for the whole NGC reported by Hidalgo- González and Álvarez-Borrego (2004), and Kahru et al. (2004), again in spite of the Colorado River water input. However, the NGC Chlsat values were not lower than 1.0mgm-3 in the case of both 1982-1984 and 1997-1998. The decrease in Chlsat in 1997-1998 was similar in the four quadrants of the NGC (Fig. 4), contrary to what Herrera- Cervantes et al. (2010) reported. These latter authors con cluded that the effect of the 1997-1998 El Niño was greater in the northwestern portion than in the rest of the NGC. Aqua-MODIS Chlsat did not show any El Niño effect because the events of the 2002-2013 period were of the Central Pacific type.

The semiannual component of variation is caused by the sequence of intense stratification during summer and mixing during autumn due to mesoscale processes, such as the change from cyclonic to anticyclonic circulation as described by Lavín et al. (1997). In early autumn, stratification weakens and because of the effect of mixing processes nutrients are transported to the euphotic zone, although not as efficiently as with coastal upwelling, generating a secondary Chlsat maximum in October (Figs. 3, 4 ).

The PP graphs parallel those of Chlsat (Figs. 4, 7 ). Even though the calculated PP fields depend on SST, PAR, and daylength, Chlsat dominated the variability in PP, as was also reported by Kahru et al. (2004) and Álvarez-Molina et al. (2013) for the whole gulf. Hidalgo-González and Álvarez- Borrego (2004) and Kahru et al. (2004) reported that the seasonal cycle is the one with most Chlsat and PP variation in the NGC. Since several decades ago, it is well known that the Chlsat and PP seasonal cycle is strongly determined by upwelling events caused by northwesterly winds off the continental coast during winter and strong stratification during summer due to southeasterly winds (Álvarez-Borrego and Lara-Lara 1991).

The high Chlsat values from CZCS were clearly higher than those from SeaWiFS and Aqua-MODIS, which could lead us to conclude that there has been a decrease in phytoplankton biomass from the 1970s and 1980s through the 2000s, because of the deterioration of the NGC's pelagic ecosystem caused by the lack of Colorado River water and its nutrients. However, these Chlsat differences could have been caused by differences in the optical design of the sensors and not by changes in the environmental conditions of the NGC. For example, Kahru et al. (2012) reported differences between the Chlsat values deduced from four sensors (OCTS, SeaWiFS, Aqua-MODIS, and MERIS) for the California Current System. In this study, differences between sensors are proven with Chlsat data from Guaymas Basin, which is a region with very high winter Chlsat and PP values, and where there is no effect caused by the lack of nutrients from rivers. High Chlsat data from CZCS for the Guaymas Basin were also clearly much higher than those from the other two sensors, very similar to that observed for the NGC (Fig. 5c). Thus, CZCS overestimates Chlsat values higher than 0.5 mg m-3 by as much as >5 times (Fig. 5).

The summer Chlsat and PP differences between the NW and the other quadrants were caused by the greater concentrations of organic matter in the former, both as detritus and as color dissolved organic matter (CDOM). These optical components of seawater strongly attenuate light at short wavelengths (Kirk 1994), and the satellite sensors detect the sum of their effects as if they were only caused by Chl, generating higher Chlsat values. The greater concentrations of detritus and CDOM in the NW quadrant are caused by the summer cyclonic circulation that transports water from the Upper Gulf of California southward, in the northwestern part of the NGC (Alvarez-Borrego 2001). In general, in the Upper Gulf turbidity increases towards the northwest, with Sechii disk depths of 2 m in relatively deep waters and of 0.5-1 m near the Baja California coast. In the most turbid areas, seston values are >130 mg L-1, with almost 100% of organic particles (Garcia-de-Ballesteros and Larroque 1976).

Santamaria-del-Angel et al. (1994a) reported that throughout the Gulf of California, the Chlsat maxima occurred off the eastern coast, during winter upwelling events. In the NGC, however, winter Chlsat maxima for the eastern quadrants showed no significant differences from those for the western quadrants. This could be attributed to the circulation in this region that carries water from one side of the NGC to the other relatively quickly, since it is the narrowest part of the gulf. A water parcel takes ~10 days to travel from one side to the other of the NGC, and phytoplankton biomass does not decrease significantly during the trajectory.

Aknowledgements

MR Ramirez-Leon was granted a postgraduate scholarship by the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT, Mexico). FJ Ponce helped with the graphical design. The comments made by two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript.

REFERENCES

Álvarez-Borrego S. 2001. The Colorado River estuary and Upper Gulf of California, Baja, Mexico. In: Seeliger U, Kjerfve B (eds.), Coastal Marine Ecosystems of Latin-America. Springer, Berlin, pp. 331-340. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Borrego S. 2002. Physical and biological linkages between the upper and lower Colorado Delta. Section Ecosystem Problems and Management at the US/Mexican Border. In: Rapport DJ, Lasley WL, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp. 1077-1089. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Borrego S, Gaxiola-Castro G. 1988. Photosynthetic parameters of northern Gulf of California phytoplankton. Cont. Shelf Res. 8: 37-47.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(88)90023-4. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Borrego S, Lara-Lara JR. 1991. The physical environment and primary productivity of the Gulf of California. In: Dauphin JP, Simoneit B (eds.), The Gulf and Peninsular Province of the Californias. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, pp. 555-567. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Borrego S, Giles-Guzmán AD. 2012. Opal in Gulf of California sediments as a tool to estimate the vertical component of water exchange between the Gulf and the Pacific Ocean. Bot. Mar. 55: 161-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bot.2011.104. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Borrego S, Rivera JA, Gaxiola-Castro G, Acosta-Ruíz MJ, Schwartzlose RA. 1978. Nutrientes en el Golfo de California. Cienc. Mar. 5(2): 53-71. [ Links ]

Álvarez-Molina LL, Álvarez-Borrego S, Lara-Lara JR, Marinone- Moscheto S. 2013. Annual and semiannual variations of phytoplankton biomass and production in the central Gulf of California estimated from satellite data. Cienc. Mar.39(2): 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v39i2.2189. [ Links ]

Aragón-Noriega AE. 2014. Modeling the individual growth of the Gulf corvina, Cynoscion othonopterus (Pisces: Sciaenidae), using a multi-model approach. Cienc. Mar.40(2): 149-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v40i2.2410. [ Links ]

Aragón-Noriega AE, Calderón-Aguilera LE. 2000. Does damming of the Colorado River affect the nursery area of blue shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris (Decapoda: Penaidae) in the Upper Gulf of California? Rev. Biol. Trop. 48: 867-871. [ Links ]

Baumgartner TR, Christensen N. 1985. Coupling of the Gulf of California to large-scale interannual climatic variability. J. Mar. Res. 43(4): 825-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1357/002224085788453967. [ Links ]

Behrenfeld MJ, Falkowski PG 1997. Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42(1):1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.L0001. [ Links ]

Brusca RC, Findley LT, Hastings PA, Hendrickx ME, Cosio JT, Van der Heiden AM. 2005. Macrofaunal diversity in the Gulf of California. In: Cartron JLE, Ceballos G, Felger R (eds.), Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Conservation in Northern Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 179-203. [ Links ]

Carvajal M, Robles A, Ezcurra E. 2010. Ecological conservation in the Gulf of California. In: Brusca RC (ed.), The Gulf of California. Biodiversity and Conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 219-250. [ Links ]

Cervantes-Duarte R, Mueller J, Trees CC, Maske H, Álvarez- Borrego S,. Lara-Lara JR 2000. Euphotic depth, irradiance attenuation and remote sensing K490 in bio-optical provinces of the Gulf of California. Cienc. Mar.26(4): 533-560. [ Links ]

Cisneros-Mata MA. 2010. The importance of fisheries in the Gulf of California and ecosystem-based sustainable co-management for conservation. In Brusca RC (ed.),. The Gulf of California. Biodiversity and Conservation, University of Arizona Press, Tucson pp. 119-134. [ Links ]

Escalante F, Valdez-Holguín JE, Álvarez-Borrego S, Lara-Lara JR 2013. Temporal and spatial variation of sea surface temperature, chlorophyll a , and primary productivity in the Gulf of California. Cienc. Mar.39(2): 203-215. http://dx.doi/org/10.7773/cm.v39i2.2233. [ Links ]

Galindo-Bect MS, Glenn EP, Page HM, Fitzsimmons K, Galindo- Bect LA, Hernández-Ayón JM, Petty RL, García-Hernández J, Moore D. 2000. Penaeid shrimp landings in the upper Gulf of California in relation to Colorado River freshwater discharge. Fish. Bull. 98: 222-225. [ Links ]

García-de-Ballesteros G, Larroque M. 1976. Elementos sobre la distribución de turbidez en el Alto Golfo de California. CalCOFI Rep. 18: 81-106. [ Links ]

Gaxiola-Castro G, Garcia-Cordova J, Valdez-Holguin JE, Botello- Ruvalcaba M. 1995. Spatial distribution of chlorophyll a and primary productivity in relation to winter physical structure in the Gulf of California. Cont. Shelf Res.15(9): 1043-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(94)00071-T. [ Links ]

Gendrop-Funes V, Acosta-Ruiz MJ, Schwartzlose RA 1978. Distribución horizontal de clorofila a durante la primavera en la parte norte del golfo de California. Cienc. Mar.5(1): 71-89. [ Links ]

Giles-Guzmán AD, Álvarez-Borrego S 2000. Vertical attenuation coefficient of photosynthetically active radiation as a function of chlorophyll concentration and depth in case 1 waters. Appl. Opt. 39(9): 1351-1358. http://dx.org/10.1364/A0.39.001351. [ Links ]

Herrera-Cervantes H, Lluch-Cota SE, Lluch-Cota D, Gutiérrez-de-Velasco G, Lluch-Belda D. 2010. ENSO influence on satellite- derived chlorophyll trends in the Gulf of California. Atmósfera 23: 253-262. [ Links ]

Hidalgo-González RM, Álvarez-Borrego S 2001. Chlorophyll profiles and the water column structure in the Gulf of California. Oceanol. Acta 24(1): 19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(00)01126-9. [ Links ]

Hidalgo-González RM,. Álvarez-Borrego S 2004. Total and new production in the Gulf of California estimated from ocean color data from the satellite sensor SeaWIFS. Deep-Sea Res. (II) 51: 739-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.10167j.dsr2.2004.05.006. [ Links ]

Kahru M, Marinone SG, Lluch-Cota SE, Parés-Sierra A, Mitchell BG 2004. Ocean-color variability in the Gulf of California: Scales from days to ENSO. Deep-Sea Res. (II) 51(1-3): 139-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.dsr2.2003.04.001. [ Links ]

Kahru M, Kudela R, Manzano-Sarabia M, Mitchell BG 2009. Trends in primary production in the California Current detected with satellite data. J. Geophys. Res. 114(C02004): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004979. [ Links ]

Kahru M, Kudela RM, Manzano-Sarabia M,. Mitchell BG 2012. Trends in the surface chlorophyll of the California Current: Merging data from multiple ocean color satellites. Deep-Sea Res. (II) 77-80: 89-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.04.007. [ Links ]

Kirk JTO. 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, 491 pp. [ Links ]

Lavín MF, Sánchez S. 1999. On how the Colorado River affected the hydrography of the Upper Gulf of California. Cont. Shelf Res.19(12): 1545-1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00030-8. [ Links ]

Lavín MF, Durazo R, Palacios E, Argote ML, Carrillo L. 1997. Lagrangian observations of the circulation in the northern Gulf of California. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 27(10): 2298-2305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<2298:LOOTCI>2.0.CO;2. [ Links ]

Lluch-Cota SE. 2000. Coastal upwelling in the eastern Gulf of California. Oceanol. Acta23(6): 731-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(00)00121-3. [ Links ]

Nieto-García E. 1998. Nutrientes en el norte del golfo de California durante condiciones estuarinas y antiestuarinas. MSc thesis, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja California, 130 pp. [ Links ]

Platt T, Caverhill C, Sathyendranath S. 1991. Basin-scale estimates of oceanic primary production by remote sensing: The North Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res.96(C8): 15147-15159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91JC01118. [ Links ]

Rodríguez CA, Flessa KW, Téllez-Duarte MA, Dettman DL, Ávila- Serrano GA. 2001. Macrofaunal and isotopic estimates of the former extent of the Colorado River estuary, Upper Gulf of California, Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 49(1): 183-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0845. [ Links ]

Rojas-Bracho L, Taylor BL. 1999. Risk factors affecting the vaquita (Phocoena sinus) Mar. Mamm. Sci. 15(4): 974-989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00873.x. [ Links ]

Rojas-Bracho L, Reeves RR, Jaramillo-Legorreta A. 2006. Conservation of the vaquita Phocoena sinus Mamm. Rev. 36(3): 179-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2006.00088.x. [ Links ]

Román-Rodríguez MJ. 2000. Estudio poblacional del chano norteño Micropogonias megalops y la curvina golfina Cynoscion othonopterus (Gilbert) (Pisces: Sciaenidae), especies endémicas del Alto Golfo de California, México. Instituto del Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora. Hoja de cálculo SNIB-CONABIO proyecto No. L298. CONABIO, México, 143 pp. [ Links ]

Santamaría-del-Ángel E, Álvarez-Borrego S, Müller-Karger FE. 1994a. The 1982-1984 El Niño in the Gulf of California as seen in coastal zone color scanner imagery. J. Geophys. Res.99(C4): 7423-7431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93JC02147. [ Links ]

Santamaría-del-Angel E, Álvarez-Borrego S,. Müller-Karger FE 1994b. Gulf of California biogeographic regions based on coastal zone color scanner imagery. J. Geophys. Res.99(C4): 7411-7421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93JC02154. [ Links ]

Santamaría-del-Ángel E, Álvarez-Borrego S, Millán-Núñez R, Müller-Karger FE 1999. Sobre el efecto débil de las surgencias de verano en la biomasa fitoplanctónica del Golfo de California. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 49: 207-212. [ Links ]

Valdez-Holguín JE, Gaxiola-Castro G,. Cervantes-Duarte R 1995. Primary productivity in the Gulf of California, calculated from the relationship between superficial irradiance and chlorophyll in the euphotic zone. Cienc. Mar.21(3): 311-329. [ Links ]

Valdez-Holguín JE, Álvarez-Borrego S, Trees CC 1999. Seasonal and spatial characterization of the Gulf of California phytoplankton photosynthetic parameters. Cienc. Mar.25(4): 445-467. [ Links ]

Welch P. 1967. The use of the fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoustics AU-15: 70-73. [ Links ]

Received: October 2014; Accepted: April 2015

* Corresponding author. E-mail: alvarezb@cicese.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License