SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número1Patógenos asociados a la muerte regresiva de la palma canariense (Phoenix canariensis) en áreas urbanas de Querétaro, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8080versión impresa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.41 no.1 Texcoco ene. 2023  Epub 11-Ago-2023

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2207-2 

Phytopathological notes

In vitro inhibition of bacteria against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2

José Guadalupe Florencio-Anastasio1  2  * 

Alejandro Alarcón1 

Clemente de Jesús García-Ávila2 

Ronald Ferrera-Cerrato1 

Andrés Quezada-Salinas2 

Juan José Almaraz-Suárez1 

Mario Espinosa-Mendoza2 

Daniela Alejandra Bocanegra-Flores2 

Lervin Hernández-Ramos2 

1 Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5. Montecillo, 56230 Texcoco, Estado de México, México.

2 Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria, Dirección General de Sanidad Vegetal, Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria, Carretera Federal México-Pachuca km 37.5, 55740 Tecámac, Estado de México, México.


Abstract

There are three races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) that affect bananas and plantains, though the Cavendish group banana cultivars are resistant to Foc race 1 (FocR1) and Foc race 2 (FocR2). However, there are no effective control methods for the Tropical Race 4 (R4T). The foregoing makes it necessary to generate biological control strategies for FocR2 fungal model that is present in Mexico, forecasting the potential introduction of FocR4T into our country. In vitro inhibition was evaluated of bacterial strains Bacillus subtilis (BASU), B. velezensis (BAVE), and B. sonorensis (BASO) against three isolates of FocR2 (MIC17188, MIC17191 and MIC17192), obtained from plant samples collected in three banana production sites in the states of Puebla, Michoacán and Oaxaca. At 14 days, the strain BASU had in average high inhibition (55.1%) in comparison to BAVE and BASO strains (45.8 and 21.7%, respectively) against the three fungal strains mentioned before. In addition, the in vitro inhibition of Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) and Serratia sp. (AC35) was also evaluated by considering three pre-inoculation timings; the strain BSP1.1 showed high inhibition (80.1%) when pre-inoculated individually seven days before the fungus and at seven days of confrontation.

Key words: Fusarium wilt; Paenibacillus sp.; Serratia sp.; Bacillus subtilis; Bacillus velezensis; Bacillus sonorensis

Resumen.

Existen tres razas de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) que afectan a bananos y plátanos, los cultivares de banano grupo Cavendish son resistentes a Foc raza 1 (FocR1) y Foc raza 2 (FocR2). Sin embargo, no existen métodos de control efectivos para la Raza 4 Tropical (R4T). Lo anterior, hace necesario generar estrategias de control biológico utilizando a FocR2 como modelo fúngico que está presente en México, y que coadyuven ante la posible introducción de FocR4T al país. Se evaluó la inhibición in vitro de las cepas bacterianas Bacillus subtilis (BASU), B. velezensis (BAVE), B. sonorensis (BASO) contra tres aislamientos de FocR2 (MIC17188, MIC17191 y MIC17192) obtenidos de muestras vegetales colectadas en tres sitios de producción de plátano de Puebla, Michoacán y Oaxaca. A los 14 días, la cepa BASU tuvo en promedio, mayor inhibición (55.1%) con respecto a BAVE y BASO (45.8 y 21.7%, respectivamente) contra las tres cepas fúngicas antes mencionadas. También se evaluó la inhibición in vitro de las bacterias Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) y Serratia sp. (AC35) en tres tiempos de pre-inoculación bacteriana. La cepa BSP1.1 presentó mayor inhibición (80.1%) cuando se pre-inoculó de manera individual, siete días antes del hongo y durante siete días de confrontación.

Palabras clave: Marchitez por Fusarium; Paenibacillus sp.; Serratia sp.; Bacillus subtilis; Bacillus velezensis; Bacillus sonorensis.

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc), causal agent of Fusarium wilt or musaceae Fusarium wilt, was reported for the first time in Australia, in 1874, and later in 1890, it was reported in Panama and Costa Rica (America); therefore, it is assumed that this pathogen spread from these two countries to the rest of this continent (Ashby, 1913; Fish, 1970). There are three races of this pathogen that affect plantains and bananas: i) Race 1 (FocR1), affects Musa textilis (abacá), bananas from the Gros Michel clones (AAA), Maqueño (AAB), Silk (AAB), Pome (AAB), Pisang Awak (ABB) and IC2 (AAAA); ii) Race 2 (FocR2), affects bananas from Bluggoe clones (ABB) and other AAAA genome hybrids; and iii) Tropical Race 4 (FocR4T) is an aggressive pathogen in Cavendish cultivars (AAA), such as Dwarf Cavendish, Grand Nain and Williams, as well as in other cultivars susceptible to FocR1 and FocR2 (Su et al., 1986; Ploetz, 2005). In Mexico this disease was reported for the first time in 1932 (Ploetz, 2018); Likewise, Florencio-Anastasio et al. (2022) determined through a phylogenetic analysis that four Foc isolates obtained from samples from the states of Puebla and Michoacan were grouped within Clade VI of the classification proposed by Fourie et al. (2009) and Karangwa et al. (2018). FocR1 has caused severe epidemics that impacted the banana industry in America, whose production was based on the Gros Michel variety, which caused the disappearance of most of the commercial plantations of this variety between 1950 and 1960, causing economic losses of up to $2.3 billion dollars (Dita et al., 2013). In the Ulua Valley (Honduras) 30,000 ha were lost from 1940 to 1960; while in Suriname and Quepos (Costa Rica) 4,000 and 6,000 ha were damaged in a period of eight and 12 years, respectively (Ploetz, 2000).

In Mexico, during the 1960s and early 1970s, close to 40,000 ha cultivated with the Gros Michel variety were destroyed; Only in 1994 there were around 4,000 ha of Manzano plantains, which were reduced to 1,260 ha, in 2004 (Orozco-Santos, 2013) and for the 2020 cycle, 1,690 ha had been established (SIAP, 2022). To counteract the economic losses caused by FocR1, the global solution consisted of replacing those plantations established with Gros Michel by cultivars of the Cavendish subgroup, which represent more than 99 % of export bananas (Dita et al., 2018). On the other hand, FocR4T was first reported in Taiwan in 1989 (Ploetz, 2018), by 2022 its distribution includes Australia, Burma, China, Colombia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Mayotte Islands (France), Israel, Jordan, Laos, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mozambique, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, United Kingdom, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, and Vietnam (Ploetz et al., 2018; Promusa, 2018; DOA, 2019; ICA, 2019; Aguayo et al., 2021; García-Bastidas et al., 2020; Özarslandan and Akgül, 2020; SENASA, 2021).

The presence of this pathogen in two countries of America (Colombia and Peru) increases the risk of its introduction to Mexico (Florencio-Anastasio et al., 2022). Although Cavendish group bananas are resistant to races 1 and 2 (Su et al., 1986), there are no resistant banana or plantain cultivars or chemicals effective against FocR4T (Cook, 2005). Likewise, some biological control schemes based on the use of antagonistic bacteria and fungi against Foc breeds have been proposed (Bubici et al., 2019); for example, the bacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2 presented 44.4% inhibition in vitro, and reduced the incidence of FocR4T in Cavendish bananas by 86.1% in the field (Ho et al., 2015). Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. fluorescens WCS417 also reduced (83.4 and 87.4%, respectively) the severity of FocR4T in Cavendish bananas in greenhouse. The use of biofertilizers based on pig manure in combination with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 reduced the incidence of FocR4T in greenhouse Cavendish bananas by 75% (Shen et al., 2015), while the same bacterium decreased the incidence of FocR4T by 68.5%. in the field (Xue et al., 2015). On the other hand, B. amyloliquefaciens W19 reduced the incidence of Foc by 42.8 and 44.4% in two Cavendish banana fields (Wang et al., 2016); In addition, B. subtilis N11 reduced the incidence of FocR4T by 82.1%, while the combination of Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR21 + Trichoderma harzianun T37 reduced the incidence of FocR4T by 64.3% in Cavendish banana (Zhang et al., 2011). The bacteria Paenibacillus sp. BSP.1.1, Serratia sp. AC35, Pseudomonas tolaasii P61, Bacillus pumilus BFIEST 4C, B. pumilus R44, B. pumilus A1, and Serratia liquefaciens CPA C53 inhibited mycelial growth in vitro of five Foc Race “1 or 2” isolates at 46.6, 26.6, 12.0, 11.9, 10.1, 9.7 and 4.9%, respectively (Florencio-Anastasio et al., 2022).

Therefore, the present investigation evaluated the in vitro effect of five antagonistic bacteria on the mycelial development of FocR2, as a model phytopathogenic fungus, given its presence in the country, to assess its potential application in future phytosanitary management schemes, in the event of a possible introduction of FocR4T to our country.

Phylogenetic analysis. To determine the race to which the isolates evaluated in the present study belong (Table 1), the same methodology reported by Florencio-Anastasio et al. (2022), phylogenetic analysis of the IGS (Intergenic spacers) region of the rDNA amplified with the primers PNFo and PN22 (Edel et al., 1995) was performed.

Table 1 Origin of the isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2, deposited in the collection of Laboratorio de Micología, del Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria (DGSV-Senasica) (Florencio-Anastasio et al., 2022). 

Aislamientos Municipio / Estado Latitud Longitud No. de accesión
CNRF-MIC17188 Hueytamalco, Puebla 20.00857 -97.24197 MN702818
CNRF-MIC17189 Hueytamalco, Puebla 20.00882 -97.2419 MN702819
CNRF-MIC17190 Hueytamalco, Puebla 20.00928 -97.24209 MN702820
CNRF-MIC17191 Tacámbaro, Michoacán 19.21827 -101.45857 MN702821
CNRF-MIC17192 Villa de Tututepec de Melchor Ocampo, Oaxaca 16.04554 -97.70423

FocR2 isolates. The fungi isolates were donated by Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria del Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA). Which were isolated from banana plantations in Hueytamalco, Puebla (MIC17188; MIC17189; MIC17190), Tacámbaro, Michoacán (MIC17191) and Villa de Tututepec de Melchor Ocampo, Oaxaca (MIC17192), from samples of individual plants collected by the National Program Phytosanitary Epidemiological Surveillance (PVEF) for surveillance and timely detection of FocR4T. The collected samples consisted of 5 x 1.5 cm fragments of vascular bundles from banana plants with yellowing symptoms.

Evaluated bacterial strains. For bioassay 1, the bacterial strains Bacillus subtilis (BASU), B. sonorensis (BASO), B. velezensis (BAVE) were used, which were provided by Laboratorio de bacterias, Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria del SENASICA (Table 2) to evaluate its effect on the mycelial growth of three FocR2 isolates (MIC17188, MIC17191 and MIC17192) (Table 1). On the other hand, in bioassay 2, the bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1 and Serratia sp. AC 35, which were provided by Laboratorio de Microbiología, Postgrado de Edafología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, to determine their influence on the mycelial growth of the FocR2 strain CNRF-MIC17188 (accession number MN702818).

Table 2 Origin of the antagonistic bacteria evaluated against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2. 

Bacteria Clave asignada Origen de las bacterias
Bacillus subtilis BASU SENASICA
Bacillus sonorensis BASO SENASICA
Bacillus velezensis BAVE SENASICA
Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1 COLPOS
Serratia sp. AC 35 COLPOS

Bioassay 1. In vitro inhibition of bacteria against three isolates of FocR2. For this bioassay, the antagonistic effect of the bacterial strains: BASU, BASO, BAZE (Table 1) on the mycelial growth of the isolates MIC17188, MIC17191 and MIC17192 (Table 2) was evaluated using the technique proposed by (Pineda-Mendoza et al., 2019). The bacteria were reactivated in nutrient agar (Merck®). Four treatments were established (three bacteria plus the control) with four repetitions each. At the ends of the Petri dishes with PDA medium (Potato Dextrose Agar, Merck®), a streak (5 cm line) of the seven-day-old bacterial strains was placed. The Petri dishes were incubated in the dark at 28 ± 2 °C for 24 h; Subsequently, 7 mm diameter agar disks of each FocR2 isolate were placed, which were removed from the margins of the seven-day-old fungal cultures and placed on the opposite side of each Petri dish, 5 cm from each other. distance from bacterial growth. The control consisted of only placing fungal growth disks in PDA culture medium. The dishes were incubated again in dark at 28 ± 2 °C; at 3, 7, 10 and 14 days after sowing, the radius of mycelial growth of each fungal isolate was measured, four measurements of fungal growth were taken with a vernier, to calculate the percentage of inhibition by utilizing the reported formula was used by Landa et al. (1997):

Percentage of inhibition R-rRx 100

Where, r is the growth radius of the fungus in the presence of the bacteria and R is the growth radius of the fungus without the bacteria (control).

Bioassay 2. In vitro inhibition of Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) and Serratia sp. against the FocR2 isolate MIC17188 at three pre-inoculation times. In this bioassay, the inhibitory effect in vitro of the bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) and Serratia sp. (AC 35) together and separately (Table 1) against the FocR2 isolate MIC17188 (Table 2) was evaluated, in previous studies, this isolate presented a higher in vitro growth rate (Florencio-Anastasio et al., 2022), three different pre-inoculation times at 2, 4 and 7 days of pre-inoculation (DPI) in the culture medium (pre-inoculation means to the seeding of the bacteria in the Petri dish prior to seeding the isolates of the fungus, in order to allow the bacteria to produce and secrete antifungal metabolites). The same inoculation procedure described in Bioassay 1 was used. A 7 mm disk of the fungus was placed in the center of the Petri dish and 5-cm streak of the bacterial strains were placed at opposite ends, in such a way that the bacterial growth was initially separated 3 cm from the fungus and 6 cm from each other. Four replicates were established for each treatment, including the control which consisted of a 7 mm disk of the fungus, and the Petri dishes were incubated again in the dark at 28 ± 2 °C. The radius of mycelial growth of the isolation of the fungus was measured at 2, 4, 6 and 7 days.

Experimental design and statistical analysis. For each trial, a completely randomized experimental design was established and they were performed separately, to avoid possible cross effects due to volatile compounds produced by antagonistic bacteria. The inhibition data were analyzed with the statistical package SAS for Windows (SAS Institute Inc, 2002), performing an analysis of variance and Tukey’s mean comparison test (α ≤ 0.05).

Phylogenetic analysis. BLAST analysis of the consensus sequences of the isolates MIC17188, MIC17189, MIC17190 (Hueytamalco, Puebla) and MIC17191 (Tacámbaro, Michoacán) confirmed the identity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2 with 100 % cover and grouped with the race within Clade VI proposed by Fourie et al. (2009) and Karangwa et al. (2018) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Phylogenetic analysis of four isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (MIC17188, MIC17189, MIC17190, MIC17191) from Puebla and Michoacan, Mexico. 

Bioassay 1. In vitro inhibition of bacteria against three isolates of Foc R2. The BASU bacterial strain was the one that caused the greatest inhibition of mycelial development of the three FocR2 isolates, with an average of 55.1%, 14 days after the confrontation. On the other hand, the BAVE and BASO strains showed an average inhibition percentage of 45.8 and 21.7%, respectively (Table 3; Figures 2 and 3).

Table 3 Comparative fungal inhibitions (average of the three strain isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2) obtained from fungal confrontations with three bacteria, 14 days after evaluation. 

Bioensayo 1 Inhibición fúngicaz (%)
Bacillus subtilis (BASU) 55.1 a
Bacillus velezensis (BAVE) 45.8 b
Bacillus sonorensis (BASO) 21.7 c

z Values ​​estimated from the control fungal growth data for the corresponding bioassay. Identical letters are not significantly different (Tukey, α ≤ 0.05), n=4.

Figure 2 In vitro inhibition of Bacillus subtilis (BASU), B. sonorensis (BASO), and B. velezensis (BAVE) against the isolates MIC17188, MIC17191, and MIC17192 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2, after 14 days of evaluation. A) Mycelial growth, and B) Percentage of inhibition. Means+Standard error. n=4. 

Figure 3 In vitro mycelial growth of the isolates MIC17188, MIC17191 and MIC17192, of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2 in the presence of Bacillus subtilis (BASU), B. sonorensis (BASO) and B. velezensis (BAVE) bacteria, at 3, 7, 10 and 14 days of evaluation. Means + Standard error. n=4. 

Bioassay 2. In vitro inhibition of Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) and Serratia sp. against the FocR2 isolate MIC17188 at three pre-inoculation times. After 7 days of evaluation, the bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1, by itself, had the greatest inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth of the MIC17188 isolate at 4 and 7 DPI of 75.9 and 80.1%, respectively, followed by the combination of Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1 + Serratia sp. AC35 whose inhibition was 52.7 and 75.5%, respectively; While the bacterial strain Serratia sp. AC35 presented inhibition values ​​of 46.8 and 52.3% on the same pre-inoculation dates (Table 4; Figure 4).

Table 4 Inhibitory effect of Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1), Serratia sp. (AC 35) and its combination, against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 2 (MIC17188), with seven days of bacterial pre-inoculation and seven days of confrontation. 

Tratamiento Inhibición fúngica (%)*
BSP 1.1 80.15 a
BSP 1.1 + AC 35 75.51 b
AC 35 52.31 c

*Estimated value from the fungal growth of the control of the corresponding bioassay. Identical letters in the column are not significantly different (Tukey, α ≤ 0.05). n=3.

Figure 4 In vitro inhibition of the bacteria Paenibacillus sp. (BSP 1.1) and Serratia sp. (AC35) against the isolate MIC17188 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense at three times of bacterial inoculation (two, four and seven days). A) Mycelial growth, and B) Percentage of inhibition. After seven days of evaluation. Means + Standard error. n=3. 

The in vitro inhibition capacity of the BASU, BAVE and BASO bacterial strains considered in this work had not been previously determined against any pathogen; these strains inhibited the mycelial growth of three FocR2 strains, by 40.87% in average, being BASU (55.1%) and BAVE (45.8%) the most effective, while BASO showed the least effectiveness (21.7%). There are reports indicating that several bacterial strains of B. subtilis exert in vitro inhibition towards F. oxysporum and at the same time reduce the incidence of FocR1 when inoculated into vitroplants of banana variety red banana (AAA) under greenhouse conditions either alone or in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 (Rubio-Tinajero et al., 2021; Kavino and Manoranjitham, 2018). Similarly, the effectiveness of B. subtilis has been evaluated in in vivo trials, based on its ability to reduce the incidence of F. oxysporum in Dioscorea villosa tubers (Khan et al., 2017). Some species of B. velezensis have shown some effectiveness in reducing the incidence of F. oxysporum in banana seedlings, under greenhouse conditions (Cao et al., 2018), and especially the incidence of FocR4T in plants of Cavendish banana var. Brazil (Huang et al., 2019). This agrees with that report from Segura-Mena et al. (2021) who mention that the use of beneficial/antagonistic bacteria are part of soil management practices to reduce the incidence and severity of diseases caused by Fusarium.

The results obtained suggest that B. subtilis and B. sonorensis could potentially be evaluated in greenhouse and later in the field, to be considered in the future as part of a management program against FocR2 and against FocR4T, before an eventual introduction of it; either through bacterization practices of plantain vitroplants before their establishment in the field or in the preparation of biofertilizer formulations that could be applied once the crop is established in the field, as has already been reported by Kavino and Manoranjitham (2018) and Huang et al. (2019).

Regarding the inhibition of mycelial growth of FocR2 MIC17188, a previous study showed that the bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. BSP1.1 and Serratia sp. AC35 exerted an inhibition of 45 and 27% when pre-inoculated one day before the fungal confrontation (Florencio-Anastasio et al., 2022); in the present work, this inhibition increased to 80.1 and 52.3%, respectively, when the bacteria were pre-inoculated in vitro, seven days before the confrontation, which suggests that the longer the bacteria have to establish themselves in the culture medium, the greater the inhibitory effect. This gives consistency to what was suggested by Caballero-Hernández (2011) when recommending the protection of banana plants with antagonistic bacteria applied seven days before the inoculation of the pathogen.

Furthermore, the strain Paenibacillus sp. BSP1.1 has also been effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia sp. (Pineda-Mendoza et al., 2019), this bacterial strain is attractive for its biotechnological use as part of an integrated management program for the biocontrol of Foc, due to the high percentage of inhibition against five isolates of Foc Race “1 or 2” (Florencio-Anastasio et al. 2022). In addition, this bacterium produces auxins and indoles, and solubilizes phosphates, which is why it is considered a good promoter of plant growth and improves seed germination and the growth of Capsicum annum plants (Angulo-Castro et al., 2018; Pineda-Mendoza, 2015; Pineda-Mendoza et al., 2019). Therefore, Paenibacillus sp. BSP1.1 can potentially be used in biological control programs as a “bacterization practice” one week before its establishment in the field to induce greater protection in plantain and banana vitroplants.

Conclusions

The bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1, by itself, had the greatest inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth of the FocR2 isolate MIC17188 when pre-inoculated at seven days.

The inhibitory effect of the combined inoculation of the bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1 and Serratia sp. AC35 was lower compared to the single inoculation of the Paenibacillus sp. BSP 1.1.

Acknowledgments

To Subdirección de Diagnóstico Fitosanitario, Coordinación de Análisis de Riesgo de Plagas y Programa Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica Fitosanitaria del Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria del Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA) for allowing the use of its facilities for this research.

Literatura citada

Aguayo J, Cerf-Wendling I, Folscher AB, Fourrier-Jeandel C, Ioos R, Mathews MC, Mostert D, Renault C, Wilson V and Viljoen A. 2021. First report of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 (TR4) causing Banana Wilt in the Island of Mayotte. Plant Disease 105(1):219. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32755365/. [ Links ]

Angulo-Castro A, Ferrera-Cerrato R, Alarcón A, Almaraz-Suárez JJ, Delgadillo-Martínez J, Jiménez-Fernández M y García-Barradas O. 2018. Crecimiento y eficiencia fotoquímica del fotosistema II en plántulas de 2 variedades de Capsicum annuum L. inoculadas con rizobacterias u hongos micorrícicos arbusculares. Revista Argentina de Microbiología 50(2):178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.03.011. [ Links ]

Ashby SF. 1913. Banana disease in Jamaica. Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture Jamaica 2(6): 95-128. https://naldc-legacy.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=12088&content =PDF. [ Links ]

Bubici G, Kaushal M, Prigigallo MI, Cabanás CGL and Mercado-Blanco J. 2019. Biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of banana. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:616. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00616/full. [ Links ]

Caballero-Hernández AJ. 2011. Uso de hongos endofíticos de Trichoderma spp. para el biocontrol del Mal de Panamá (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense) raza tropical 1 en vitroplantas del cultivar Gros Michel (AAA). Tesis Magister Scientiae en Agricultura Ecológica. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza. Escuela de Posgrado. 90 p. https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/5623. [ Links ]

Cao Y, Pi H, Chandrangsu P, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhou H, Xiong H, Helmann JD and Cai Y. 2018. Antagonism of two plant-growth promoting Bacillus velezensis isolates against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum. Scientific Reports 8:4360. https://doi.org./10.1038/s41598-018-22782-z. [ Links ]

Cook DC, Taylor AS, Meldrum RA and Drenth A. 2015. Potential economic impact of panama disease (tropical race 4) on the Australian banana industry. Journal of Plant Disease Protection 122(5/6):229-237. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03356557. [ Links ]

Dita RMA, Echegoyén RPE y Pérez VLF. 2013. Plan de contingencia ante un brote de la raza 4 tropical de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense en un país de la región del OIRSA. Organismo Internacional Regional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (OIRSA). San Salvador, El Salvador. 155p. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Plutarco_Echegoyen/publication /256547836_Plan_de_contingencia_ante_un_brote_de_la_raza_4_tropical_de_Fusarium_oxysporum_f_sp_cubense_en_un_pais_de_la_region_del_OIRSA/links/02e7e5236098aa1954000000.pdfLinks ]

Dita M, Barquero M, Heck D, Mizubuti ES and Staver CP. 2018. Fusarium wilt of banana: current knowledge on epidemiology and research needs toward sustainable management. Frontiers in Plant Science 9(1468). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202804/. [ Links ]

DOA. 2019. Detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 in Thailand. Department of Agriculture (DOA) of Thailand. Pest Reports from Thailand. International Plant Protection Convention. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/thailand/pestreports/2019 /11/detection-of-fusarium-oxysporum-f-sp-cubense-tropical-race-4-in-thailand/. [ Links ]

Edel V, Steinberg C. Avelange l. Laguerre G, Alabouvette C. 1995. Comparison of three molecular methods for the characterization of Fusarium oxysporum strains. Phytopathology 85:579-585. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1995Ar-ticles/Phyto85n05_579.PDF. [ Links ]

Florencio-Anastasio JG, García-Ávila CJ, Alarcón A, Ferrera-Cerrato R, Quezada-Salinas A, Almaraz-Suárez JJ, Moreno-Velázquez M and Hernández-Ramos L. 2022. Effectiveness of antagonistic bacteria, commercial fungicides, and fourth generation quaternary ammonium salts, against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race “1 or 2”. European Journal of Plant Pathology 163:719-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02510-0. [ Links ]

Fish S. 1970. The history of plant pathology in Australia. The Annual Review of Phytopathology 8:13-36. https://appsnet.org/History/THE%20HISTORY%20OF%20PLANT%20PATH-OLOGY%20IN%20AUSTRALIA.pdf. [ Links ]

Fourie G, Steenkamp ET, Gordon TR and Viljoen A. 2009. Evolutionary relationships among the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense vegetative compatibility groups. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (14): 4770-4781. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC2708428/. [ Links ]

García-Bastidas FA, Quintero-Vargas JC, Ayala-Vásquez M, Schermer T, Seidl MF, Santos-Paiva M, Noguera AM, Aguilera-Gálvez C, Wittenberg A, Hofstede R, Sorensen A and Kema HJ. 2020. First report of Fusarium Wilt Tropical Race 4 in Cavendish bananas caused by Fusarium odoratissimum in Colombia. Plant Disease 104(3): 994. https://apsjournals. apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1922-PDN. [ Links ]

Ho YN, Chiang HM, Chao CP, Su CC, Hsu HF, Guo CT, Hsieh JL and Huang CC. 2015. In planta biocontrol of soilborne Fusarium wilt of banana through a plant endophytic bacterium, Burkholderia cenocepacea 869T2. Plant Soil 387: 295-306. https://link.springer.com/ content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-014-2297-0.pdf. [ Links ]

Huang J, Pang Y, Zhang F, Huang Q, Zhang M, Tang S, Fu H and Li P. 2019. Suppression of Fusarium wilt of banana by combining acid soil ameliorant with biofertilizer made from Bacillus velezensis H-6. European Journal of Plant Pathology 154: 585-596. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10658-019-01683-5. [ Links ]

ICA. 2019. Resolución No. 00011912. Por medio de la cual se declara el estado de emergencia fitosanitaria en el territorio nacional por la presencia de la enfermedad conocida como marchitez de las musáceas por Foc R4T. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. 22 p. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/499e9fe5-1c2c-482a-87a9-62ae25f02f53/2019R11912.aspx. [ Links ]

Karangwa P, Monster D, Ndayihanzamaso P, Dubois T, Niere B, Felde AZ, Shouten A, Blomme G, Beed F and Viljoen A. 2018. Genetic diversity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in East and Central Africa. Plant Disease 102: 552-560. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-17-0282-RE. [ Links ]

Kavino M and Manoranjitham SK. 2018. In vitro bacterization of banana (Musa spp.) with native endophytic and rhizospheric bacterial isolates: Novel ways to combat Fusarium wilt. European Journal of Plant Pathology 151: 371-387. https://en.xmol.com/paper/article /1335489338024620155. [ Links ]

Khan N, Maymon M and Hirsch AM. 2017. Combating Fusarium infection using Bacillus-based antimicrobials. Microorganism 5:75. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040075. [ Links ]

Landa B, Hervás A, Bettiol W and Jiménez-Díaz R. 1997. Antagonistic activity of bacteria from the chickpea rhizosphere against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Phytoparasitica 25:305-318. https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/bitstream/doc/12764/1/1997AP039 BettiolAntagonistic3360.PDF. [ Links ]

Orozco-Santos M. 2013. Historia y situación actual del Mal de Panamá (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense) en México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 31: S35. http://rmf.smf.org.mx/suplemento/docs/suplemento.pdf. [ Links ]

Özarslandan M and Akgül DS. 2020. First report of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Race 4 causing Fusarium wilt disease of banana in Turkey. Plant Disease 104(3):974. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1881-PDN. [ Links ]

Pineda-Mendoza DY. 2015. Potencial de tres cepas de rizobacterias como antagonistas de Rhizoctonia solani en chile serrano (Capsicum annuum L.). Tesis de maestría en Edafología. Colegio de Posgraduados, Área de Microbiología. Montecillo, Estado de México. México. 60 p. [ Links ]

Pineda-Mendoza DY, Almaraz JJ, Lara-Hernández ME, Arteaga-Garibay R y Silva-Rojas HV. 2019. Cepas de bacterias aisladas de esporomas de hongos ectomicorrízicos promueven el crecimiento vegetal. ITEA-Información Técnica Económica Agraria 115(1): 4-17. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2018.027. [ Links ]

Ploetz RC. 2000. Panama disease: A classic and destructive disease of banana. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2000-1204-01-HM. [ Links ]

Ploetz RC. 2005. Panama Disease: An old nemesis rears its ugly head part 2: The Cavendish era and beyond. Online. APSnet Features. https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/apsnetfeatures/Documents/2005/PanamaDisease2.pdfLinks ]

Ploetz R. 2018. Fusarium wilt. pp. 207-228. In: Jones, D.R. (Ed.). Diseases of Banana, Abacá, and Enset. CABI publishing. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=HeWCDwAAQBAJ &pg=PA210&lpg=PA210&dq=Panama+disease+belice+1913&source=bl&ots=zZ9heNd4FZ&sig=ACfU3U0Ja8JJnKiPWMYIAItIszG364kP7w&hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjixuiVwLrkAhVEQ6wKHbRZACMQ6AEwDXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=true. [ Links ]

Promusa. 2018. TR4 present in the UK (United Kingdom). A global programme for Musa improvement (Promusa). https://www.promusa.org/blogpost580-TR4-present-in-the-UK. [ Links ]

Rubio-Tinajero S, Osorio-Hernández E, Estrada-Drouaillet B, Silva-Espinosa JHT, Rodríguez-Mejía MDL and Nava-Juárez RA. 2021. In vitro antagonist biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporum and Dickeya chrysanthemi. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 39(3): 515-528. https://www.smf.org.mx/rmf/Vol3932021/RMF2104-1.pdf. [ Links ]

Segura-Mena RA, Stoorvogel JJ, García-Bastidas F, Salacinas-Niez M, Kema GHJ and Sandoval JA. 2021. Evaluating the potential of soil management to reduce the effect of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in banana (Musa AAA). European Journal of Plant Pathology 160:441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02255-2. [ Links ]

SENASA. 2021. Primer Reporte sobre Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Raza 4 Tropical, W.C. Snyder & H.N. Hansen 1940. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Agraria del Perú (SENASA). https://assets.ippc.int/static/media/files/pestreport/2021/04/30/Reporte_Foc_R4T_PERU_IPPC_29_abril_2021.pdf. [ Links ]

Shen Z, Ruan Y, Wang B, Zhong S, Su L, Li R and Shen Q. 2015. Effect of biofertilizer for suppressing Fusarium wilt disease of banana as well as enhancing microbial and chemical properties of soil under greenhouse trial. Applied Soil Ecology 93:111-119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929139315001158. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2022. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/. [ Links ]

Su HJ, Hwang SC and Ko WH. 1986. Fusarium wilt of Cavendish bananas in Taiwan. Plant Disease 70(9): 814-818. http://www.apsnet.org/publications/PlantDisease/BackIssues/Do-cuments/1986Articles/PlantDisease70n09_814.PDF. [ Links ]

Wang BB, Shen ZZ, Zhang FG, Raza W, Yuan J, Huang R, Ruan YZ, Li R and Shen QR. 2016. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain W19 can promote growth and yield and suppress Fusarium wilt in banana under greenhouse and field conditions. Pedosphere 26(5): 733-744. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1002016015600832. [ Links ]

Xue C, Penton R, Shen Z, Zhang R, Huang Q, Li R, Ruan Y and Shen Q. 2015. Manipulating the banana rhizosphere microbiome for biological control of Panama disease. Scientific Reports 5:11124. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep11124.pdf. [ Links ]

Zhang N, Wu K, He X, Li SQ, Zhang Z H, Shen B, Yang XM, Zhang RF, Huang QW and Shen QR. 2011. A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant Soil 344:87-97. https://link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s11104-011-0729-7. [ Links ]

Received: July 04, 2022; Accepted: December 27, 2022

*Corresponding author: aalarconcp@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License