SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 número2Caracterización bioquímica del estrés oxidativo durante la interacción compatible entre el Pepper golden mosaic virus y plantas de chile habaneroEpidemiología de Bean common mosaic virus y Alternaria alternata en 12 genotipos de Phaseolus vulgaris índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versão On-line ISSN 2007-8080versão impressa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.40 no.2 Texcoco Mai. 2022  Epub 03-Out-2022

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2202-6 

Scientific articles

Phytochemical profile and in vitro activity of Agave angustifolia and A. cupreata extracts against phytopathogenic fungi

Anayareth Almazán-Morales1 

Ma. Elena Moreno-Godínez,1 

Elías Hernández-Castro2 

Mirna Vázquez-Villamar2 

José Antonio Mora-Aguilera3 

Eugenia Cabrera-Huerta3 

Patricia Alvarez-Fitz4  * 

1 Facultad de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero. Avenida Lázaro Cárdenas S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, C.P. 39087, México

2 Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales. Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero. Carretera Iguala-Teloloapan S/N, Iguala de la Independencia, Guerrero, C.P. 40040, México

3 Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillos, Texcoco, C.P. 56230, México;

4 Cátedras CONACyT. Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero. Avenida Lázaro Cárdenas S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, C.P. 39087, México


Abstract.

Phytopathogenic fungi can cause economic losses. The application of natural products from species of the genus Agave is an alternative for controlling these organisms. The present study aimed to determine the phytochemical profile of Agave angustifolia and A. cupreata extracts and to evaluate their antifungal activity against several species of phytopathogenic fungi. The aqueous extract from A. angustifolia and the acetonic extract from A. cupreata were studied. The phytochemical profile was determined by thin-layer chromatography. Mycelial growth inhibition and spore production were evaluated. Phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and triterpenes. The acetonic extract of A. cupreata inhibited 76, 60, and 59% of the mycelial growth of Lasiodiplodia viticola, Colletotrichum sp., and Epicoccum sorghinum, respectively, at 8 and 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05), while spore production decreased by 92 and 86 % (p≤0.001) for Fusarium subglutinans and Colletotrichum sp., respectively. The aqueous extract of A. angustifolia inhibited 40% of the mycelial growth of E. sorghinum at 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05) and reduced the spore production of L. viticola by 35% (p≤0.001). The results indicate that the extracts under study can be an alternative source of antifungal compounds.

Key words: Agave; phytopathogenic fungi; in vitro inhibition

Resumen.

Los hongos fitopatógenos pueden causar pérdidas económicas. La aplicación de productos naturales de especies del género Agave constituye una alternativa para el control de estos organismos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar el perfil fitoquímico de extractos de Agave angustifolia y A. cupreata, así como evaluar su actividad antifúngica contra varias especies de hongos fitopatógenos. Se obtuvo el extracto acuoso de las hojas de A. angustifolia y acetónico de A. cupreata. El perfil fitoquímico se determinó por cromatografía en capa fina y se evaluó la inhibición del crecimiento micelial y producción de esporas. El tamizaje reveló la presencia de alcaloides, flavonoides, saponinas y triterpenos. El extracto acetónico de A. cupreata inhibió el 76, 60 y 59% del crecimiento micelial de Lasiodiplodia viticola, Colletotrichum sp., y Epicoccum sorghinum respectivamente a 8 y 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05), mientras que el porcentaje de producción de esporas disminuyó 92 y 86 % (p≤0.001) para Fusarium subglutinans y Colletotrichum sp., respectivamente. El extracto acuoso de A. angustifolia inhibió 40% del crecimiento micelial de E. sorghinum a 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05) y disminuyó en 35% (p≤0.001) la producción de esporas de L. viticola. Los resultados indicaron que los extractos representan una alternativa para obtención de compuestos antifúngicos.

Palabras clave: Agave; hongos fitopatógenos; inhibición in vitro

According to some estimates, the world population will reach 9.7 billion by 2050. Agricultural production will have to increase to meet the increased demand for food (United Nations, 2019). A worldwide problem working against increased agricultural production is the damaging effect of diseases caused by pathogens that reduce harvest yields and in extreme cases cause the death of crops (Jain et al., 2019). These pathogens include nematodes, phytoplasmas, viruses, bacteria, and fungi (Ortiz-Martínez et al., 2022). Phytopathogenic fungi are one of the main infectious agents of crops during pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest stages (transport, storage and marketing), causing very significant economic losses (Juárez et al., 2010). Among the species of phytopathogenic fungi that are considered of agricultural importance because they infect a wide variety of crops and affect the quality, nutritional value and sensory characteristics of agricultural products are Alternaria spp., Botrytis spp., Epicoccum sorghinum, Fusarium spp., Lasiodiplodia spp., Monilinia spp., Mucor spp., Penicillium spp., Rhizopus spp., Colletotrichum spp., Aspergillus spp., Phomopsis spp., and Phytophthora spp. (De Oliveira et al., 2021). Many agricultural products are susceptible to these pathogens, which cause necrotic lesions on the leaves (leaf spots), gummosis, vascular wilt, rot, decay, and extensive necrosis (Nachilima et al., 2020; Palma-Guerrero et al., 2021). Chemical fungicides are the most widely used method for controlling these phytopathogenic fungi due to their quickness and effectiveness. However, frequent application of these compounds has led to the development of resistance in various fungal strains and has negative effects on human health and the environment (Zubrod et al., 2019). In Mexico, there are an estimated 10,000-13,000 endemic plants that have various biological properties (antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, and antifungal activity, among others). The extracts or compounds (alone or in combination) obtained from them are important for the pharmaceutical, food and agricultural industries. The latter is constantly looking for new fungicides of natural origin that can be used in the field and that can bring added value to endemic plants. Scientific interest in the use of plant products such as essential oils, organic extracts and purified compounds has increased in recent years. These products are recommended as safe alternatives to synthetic fungicides and as an important element of sustainable agricultural practices (Tapia- Quirós et al., 2020; Mui Yun Wong et al., 2020). The antifungal potential of various plant extracts (Larrea tridentata, Tagetes lucida, Flourensia cernua, Acaciella angustissima, Jatropha cuneata, Yucca filifera) was evaluated against Fusarium oxysporum, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum spp., Aspergillus flavus, Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria alternata, Sclerotium spp., among others, and it was reported that they induced 30-100% inhibition of mycelial growth (Asael et al., 2018).

Agaves are plants with high social, ecological, and economic importance. They are used in more than 100 different ways, such as food, drink, medicine, decoration, fiber, fuel, fertilizer, and construction material, among others. Their ecological importance lies in their ability to limit rainwater runoff, reduce soil erosion, capture carbon, and offer shelter and food to a wide range of animal species, from insects to mammals. Their most important use is as raw material for the production of distilled beverages such as mezcal, tequila, sotol, charanda, and bacanora (García-Mendoza, 2007; Barrientos-Rivera et al., 2019). These plants are characterized by synthesizing secondary metabolites such as fatty acids, terpenes, coumarins, triterpenes, steroids, tannins, flavonoids, glycosides, fructans, saponins, and alkaloids, which are responsible for their various biological activities (El-Hawary et al., 2020; Soto- Castro et al., 2021). The antifungal activity of the genus Agave has been evaluated against fungi of agricultural importance such as Postia placenta, Aspergillus niger, B. cinerea, Mucor spp., Fusarium spp., and Penicillium spp. (El-Hawary et al., 2020; Soto-Castro et al., 2021).

In Guerrero, Mexico, the “piña” of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata is traditionally used for the production of mezcal. However, the leaves, which represent 46% of the total weight of the plant, are not used in any other process and become a waste product (Iñiguez-Covarrubias et al., 2001). Recent studies have shown that the leaves of A. cupreata contain anthrones, anthraquinones, coumarins, alkaloids, essential oils, pungent compounds, and saponins, which have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity (Salazar-Pineda et al., 2017). Triterpenes (β-sitosterol), steroidal saponins (aglycones or glycosylated), and fructans have been isolated from the leaves of A. angustifolia and their antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiulcerogenic, and molluscicidal activity has been evaluated (López-Salazar et al., 2019; Camacho-Campos et al., 2020). There are no previous reports on the antifungal activity of A. cupreata and A. angustifolia. Thus, the present study aimed: 1) to determine the phytochemical profile of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata, and 2) to evaluate the antifungal effect of the extracts of these two botanical species on the mycelial growth and spore production of five phytopathogenic fungi of agricultural importance.

Materials and methods

Plant material. Leaves of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata were collected in the state of Guerrero, Mex., in the towns of Coacán, municipality of Atenango del Río (Latitude: 18.139444, Longitude: -49.187778) and in Totomochapa municipality of Tlapa de Comonfort, Guerrero (Latitude: 17.541111, Longitude: -98.459167) respectively. The identification of A. cupreata and A. angustifolia was carried out by Dr. Abisaí J. García Mendoza of the National Herbarium of Mexico (MEXU). The assigned accession numbers were: MEXU-2050 for Agave cupreata and ARC for Agave angustifolia.

Obtaining extracts from Agave spp. The collected leaves were cleaned with water. With the help of a knife, they were then cut into fractions of an approximate size of 3 cm. The aqueous extract of A. angustifolia (EAAa) was obtained by mixing the plant material (300 g) with water at 60 °C and leaving it to stand for 3 h. The mixture was then filtered and the obtained aqueous extract was frozen at ˗40 °C until lyophilization, which was carried out in a Free Zone 4.5 L system (Labconco, Kansas, USA) at a vacuum of 0.045 mBar and a temperature of -52 °C. The obtained powder was stored at ˗20 °C for later use in the antifungal activity test. The acetone extract of A. cupreata (EAAc) was obtained by direct maceration of the leaves (3500 g) with acetone (Golden Bell, Mexico) for 48 h. It was then filtered and the organic phase was evaporated in a rotary evaporator (digital rotary 410, Puebla, Mexico) at 80 rpm and 60 °C. Once the extract was obtained, it was stored at room temperature in amber bottles protected from light. The yield percentage of the extracts was calculated using the following formula:

Yield percentage=Extract obtained gX 100Macerated plant material (g) 

Qualitative phytochemical Profile. The phytochemical profile was determined using thin-layer chromatography, as proposed by Salazar-Pineda et al. (2017). The extracts (5 mg) were diluted in 1 mL of extraction solvent and placed, using a capillary tube, on chromatoplates with silica gel TLC-F254 (5 cm high x 5 cm wide; Merck) that were eluted with hexane-acetone (7:3). The chromatoplates were observed under UV light (254 nm) and sprayed with the following chemical developers: Dragendorff (alkaloids), Polyethylene glycol (flavonoids), Liebermann-Burchard (triterpenes and saponins), and vanillin-phosphoric acid (terpenes, lignans, and curcubitacins) for the qualitative identification of secondary metabolites.

Phytopathogenic fungi and preparation of colonies. The fungi used were obtained from the collection of the Laboratory of Fruit Diseases of the Phytopathology Program of the Colegio de Postgraduados, based in Motecillo, Texcoco, Mexico. The species used in the assays were: E. sorghinum, Fusarium subglutinans, Lasiodiplodia viticola, L. iraniensis, and Colletotrichum sp., all of which were pathogenic for their primary hosts. Colonies of each fungal species were used for in vitro tests. The colonies were obtained from monosporic isolates and incubated for 72 h in Petri dishes with PDA medium (Potato Dextrose Agar 5%, Bioxon, Mexico).

Effect of Agave spp. extracts on mycelial growth. The agar dilution technique was used (González-Alvarez et al., 2015), with some modifications. The EAAc and EAAa extracts were dissolved in sterile water to concentrations of 2-16 mg mL-1 and placed in sterile Petri dishes (60 x 15 mm) containing 3 mL of unsolidified PDA agar. Once the agar gelled, a PDA disk with mycelial growth (5 mm in diameter) was placed in the center of the Petri dishes for each experimental fungal species. The dishes were incubated at 25 °C and the diameter of mycelial growth was monitored at 24, 48 and 72 h until the negative control colony (PDA medium plus fungi without extracts) covered the surface of the Petri dish completely. The antifungal Mancozeb (Manzate®) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 16 mg mL-1. All tests were performed in triplicate. The percentage of mycelial growth inhibition was determined at 72 h and was estimated using the following formula:

% of inhibition=1-D2/D1*100

Where D1 is the average value of the diameter of the negative control colony and D2 is the average value of the diameter of the colony inhibited by the extracts.

Effect of Agave spp. extracts on spore production. The effect of the EAAc and EAAa extracts on sporulation at 72 h of growth was determined in the same Petri dishes that were used to determine antifungal activity at a concentration of 16 mg mL-1. The mycelium in the dishes was sprinkled with sterile distilled water (5 mL) and scraped with a bacteriological loop. The obtained suspension was filtered through a Pasteur pipette containing cotton as a filter (sterile) to remove fragments of culture medium and mycelium. Subsequently, 20 µL of the filtered suspension were placed in a Neubauer chamber. The spores were counted with the help of an optical microscope (10x; Olympus). The spore concentration was expressed in spores mL-1. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis. The results were expressed as the mean of three repetitions ± standard deviation. Mycelial growth inhibition was assessed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s test. The inhibition of spore production was assessed using Dunnett’s test with the negative control used for comparison. A value of p ˂0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical package Sigma Plot version 11.0 was used for all analyses.

Results and discussion

Phytochemical profile. The amount of extract obtained for EAAc was 20 g (0.57%) and 2.8 g (0.93%) for EAAa. Different phytochemical compounds were identified in the EAAc and EAAa extracts (Table 1). The variability is mainly due to the polarity of the solvent used in the extraction since the extractability of the compounds depends on their nature and solubility (Bui et al., 2021). The flavonoids present in the EAAa are generally extracted using highly polar solvents such as water, while the alkaloids detected in the EAAc are insoluble or slightly soluble in water, so they are extracted with other organic solvents such as ethanol, methanol, acetone, and chloroform. The presence or absence of certain compounds is also due to the biotic or abiotic factors to which the plants have been subjected (Pavarini et al., 2012). The saponins detected in A. cupreata have already been reported by Salazar-Pineda et al. (2017) and Urbina et al. (2018). Steroidal saponins have also been identified in methanolic extracts of the leaves of A. angustifolia (Pereira et al., 2017). Some authors have pointed out that these compounds are very common in the genus and yucagenin, hecogenin, tigogenin, diosgenin, ruizgenin and chlorogenin have been identified in species such as: A. lechuguilla, A. americana, A. inaequidens, A. hookeri, A. fourcroydes, A. brittoniana, and A. macroacantha (López-Salazar et al., 2019; González-Madariaga et al., 2020). With respect to triterpenes, Ahumada-Santos et al. (2013) reported the presence of p-cymene, limonene, β-trans ocimene, linalool, α-terpineol, nerol, geraniol and trans-nerolidol in extracts of A. angustifolia. Salazar-Pineda et al. (2017) reported the qualitative presence of triterpenes in extracts of the leaves of A. cupreata. The presence of α-linalool, α-terpinene, limonene, geraniol, nerol, α-cubebene, cadinene and trans-nerolidol, among others, has also been detected in extracts of Agave salmiana, Agave tequilana, and Agave potatorum (Soto-Castro et al., 2021). Regarding flavonoids, Ahumada-Santos et al. (2013) mentioned that the concentration of flavonoids in A. angustifolia was low. Kaempferol, myricetin rhamnoside, and quercetin arabinoside have been identified in the methanolic extracts of the leaves of Agave attenuata and qualitatively in A. potatorum (Soto-Castro et al., 2021).

Table 1 Qualitative phytochemical profile of the aqueous and acetone extracts of Agave angustifolia and Agave cupreata 

Revelador Metabolito identificado Disolvente
EAAay EAAcz
Dragendorff Alcaloides - +
Polietilenglicol Flavonoides + -
Liebermann-Burchard Triterpenos, Saponinas + +
Vainillina ácido fosfórico Terpenos, Lignanos, Curcubitacinas - -

yEAAa: extracto acuoso de Agave angustifolia, zEAAc: extracto de acetona de Agave cupreata; +: Presencia, - Ausencia.

Effect of Agave spp. extracts on mycelial growth. The obtained extracts showed different effects on the mycelial growth of the fungi under study (Figure 1). In general, the application of these extracts was associated with a decrease in colony growth (Figure 1 A2-E2), presence of aerial mycelium (Figure 1 B2 and 3; D2 and 3), cottony (Figure 1 A5, C5, D5, E5) and deformed (Figure 1 A2, A5, C5, E5), as well as pigment production (Figure 1 A2, A3, A4, C5 and D3). The colonies in the negative control grew with normal shape, size and texture (Figure 1 A1-E1).

Even though no previous studies exist on the negative effect of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata on the morphology of the fungi under study, Siddhapura et al. (2011) mentioned that the methanolic extracts of Agave ferox, A. marginata, A. americana, A. montana and A. scabra affected the development of Postia placenta. The observed effects on the morphology, texture, vertical expansion of the mycelium, dehydration and pigment production have already been reported (De la Cruz-Ricardez et al., 2020). However, it is important to indicate that the mechanism by which they are produced is related to the action of metabolites associated with the cell wall. For example, the essential oils of Lavandula angustifolia and Eucalyptus globulus induced the formation of rough folds, torsion, peeling, fractures, and dehydration of the hyphae of Monilinia fructicola and Rhizopus stolonifer (da Silva et al., 2020; De la Cruz- Ricardez et al., 2020).

Figure 1 Effect of the aqueous extract from the leaves of A. angustifolia (EAAa) and the acetone extract of A. cupreata (EAAc) on the growth of five phytopathogenic fungi incubated in 5% PDA for 24 and 72 hours of exposure. A) E. sorghinum; B) F. subglutinans; C) L. viticola; D) L. iraniensis; E) Colletotrichum sp. C (+): antifungal Mancozeb (Manzate®) at 16 mg mL-1; C(-): 5% PDA agar. 

Table 2 shows the antifungal effect of different concentrations of EAAa and EAAc against phytopathogenic fungi. The inhibition of mycelial growth of EAAc (39-76%) was significantly different (p≤0.05) compared to that of EAAa (20-40%). The table shows that the species L. viticola, E. sorghinum and Colletotrichum sp. were sensitive to EAAc, with mycelial growth inhibition percentages between 38 and 76% at concentrations of 16 and 8 mg mL-1 (p≤0.001).

In the case of EAAa, the percentages of mycelial growth inhibition in E. sorghinum and Colletotrichum sp. did not show statistically significant differences (p≥0.064) at concentrations of 4-16 mg mL-1. However, this extract was the only one that showed inhibitory activity against F. subglutinans, at 16 mg mL-1. Exposure to EAAa had no effect on L. viticola and L. iraniensis.

The results obtained demonstrate for the first time the antifungal activity of the polar extracts EAAa and EAAc on phytopathogenic fungi of economic interest. However, other authors have indicated the antifungal potential of polar extracts obtained from different species of Agave (A. montana, A. americana, A. marginetta, A. lechuguilla, A. scabra and A. ferox) against Fusarium oxysporum, F. solani, F. udum, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, reporting mycelial growth inhibition percentages ranging from 15 to 100% (De Rodríguez et al., 2011; Maharshi and Thaker, 2014; González-Alvarez et al., 2015).

Table 2 Inhibition percentage of mycelial growth of five phytopathogenic fungi exposed to aqueous and acetonic extracts from the leaves of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata 

Extracto Concentración(mg mL-1) % de inhibición del crecimiento micelial
Epicoccumsorghinum Fusarium subglutinans Lasiodiplodia viticola Lasiodiplodia iraniensis Colletotrichum sp.
2 --- --- --- --- ---
EAAay 4 39.4b --- --- --- ---
8 39.4b --- --- --- ---
16 40.0b 20.0a --- --- 41.6b
2 --- --- 17.3b --- ---
EAAcz 4 13.3c --- 16.6b --- 32.0c
8 39.4b --- 74.0a 12.0b 38.0b
16 59.6a --- 76.6a 17.8a 60.8a
Control (+) Manzate 16 100 100 100 100 100

yEAAa: extracto acuoso de Agave angustifolia acuoso, zEAAc: extracto de acetona de Agave cupreata; ---: No Presentó inhibición del crecimiento micelial. Medias con letras distintas en una misma columna son significativamente diferentes (Tukey; p≤0.05).

The results of the present study show variability in the phytochemical profile (Table 1) and mycelial growth inhibition activity (Table 2) of the Agave extracts under study when used on phytopathogenic fungi. The biological effect of each compound on different microorganisms has been reported before. Lagrouh et al. (2017) mentioned the antifungal effect of alkaloids and attributed to them the ability to intercalate with DNA, stop protein synthesis, induce apoptosis, and inhibit carbohydrate metabolism enzymes. Zhao et al. (2021) indicated that the alkaloid lycorine damages the integrity of cell membranes, reduces cell viability and affects the expression of GTPase BcMPS1, Bccdc, BcRac and BcRas1 in B. cinerea. Furthermore, flavonoids have been reported to have antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans through their effect on protein precipitation and the formation of complexes with the nucleophilic amino acids of proteins, which inactivates them and causes developmental arrest. In contrast, the effect of flavonoids on B. cinerea is attributed to the inhibition of fungal endo-1,3-β-glucanase (Jin, 2019; Tapia-Quirós et al., 2020). In R. solani, terpene compounds affect the permeability of the pathogen’s membrane, causing metabolic disorders and inhibiting mycelial growth. They also disrupt the potential of the mitochondrial membrane (causing loss of structure and function), inhibit the cycle of tricarboxylic acids, reduce ATP content and inhibit ATPase (Yan et al., 2020). Regarding saponins, it has been determined that these compounds form complexes with sterols in the cell membranes, causing them to disintegrate through the formation of pores and the triggering of cell lysis (Zaynab et al., 2021). Ito et al. (2007) mentioned that α tomatine induces apoptosis mediated by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in F. oxysporum.

Effect of Agave spp. extracts on spore production.Figure 2 shows the effect of the extracts under study on the production of spores of each of the fungal strains tested. The most surprising results were obtained with the EAAa extract, which showed 40% inhibition of mycelial growth against F. subglutinans and Colletotrichum sp. However, spore production decreased by 92 and 86.6% compared to the negative control, respectively (Figure 2 B and E). This result is relevant for the control of these phytopathogens because it would prevent their reproduction and dissemination. On the contrary, EAAa stimulated the production of the spores of E. sorghinum and L. viticola (Figure 2 A and C), causing an increase of 407.5 and 73.2%, respectively, compared to the negative control (p≤0.001). No effect was observed on the production of spores L. iraniensis (Figure 2D). Regarding the EAAc extract, which showed a greater inhibiting effect on the mycelial growth of L. viticola, E. sorghinum and Colletotrichum sp. (Table 2), caused a decrease of only 35.6% in the production of spores of L. viticola (Figure 2C), compared to the negative control (p≤ 0.001), while no effects were observed on the spore production of E. sorghinum, F. subglutinans, L. iraniensis and Colletotrichum sp. (Figure 2 A, B, D and E), compared to the negative control (p≥0.05).

Figure 2 Effect of the aqueous extract from the leaves of A. angustifolia (EAAa) and the acetone extract of A. cupreata (EAAc) on the spore production of five phytopathogenic fungi incubated in 5% PDA for 72 hours of exposure. C(-): negative control, 5% PDA agar. The results are expressed as the average of three repetitions ± standard deviation. Dunnet’s statistical test with respect to C(-). * = significant (p˂0.05); highly significant (** p˂0.001). 

Although the inhibitory effect of extracts from different agaves on the mycelial growth of various species of fungi has been evaluated before, studies on the inhibition of sporulation are still scarce. Lozano-Muñiz et al. (2011) found that the aqueous and methanolic extracts from the leaves and flowers of A. americana, A. asperrima, A. lechuguilla, A. tequilana negatively affected the conidiogenesis of Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus. They reported that the methanolic extracts of A. asperrima and A. americana caused notable changes in conidiophore morphology, which may affect conidiogenesis. Other authors pointed out that the inhibition or stimulation of spore production are possible responses of fungi when exposed to different extracts. For example, Achimon et al. (2020) reported that the essential oils of Pimenta dioica and Curcuma longa (1000 mg L-1) inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium verticillioides M3125 by 87.2 and 55.5%, respectively, but the percentages of conidia production were 3046.4 and 341% respectively. The authors also reported that oils from Rosmarinus officinalis showed little growth inhibitory activity (24%), but inhibited conidia production by 27% compared to the control, which is similar to what was observed in the present study.

Conclusions

The phytochemical profile of the extracts of A. angustifolia and A. cupreata confirmed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins and triterpenes.

The aqueous extract of A. cupreata showed an antifungal effect against L. viticola, Colletotrichum sp. and E. sorghinum inhibiting 76, 60 and 59 % of mycelial growth, respectively, at concentrations of 8 and 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05), while spore production decreased by 86% in Colletotrichum sp. Therefore, this extract has the potential to be used as an alternative source of new natural antifungal compounds.

The acetone extract of A. angustifolia inhibited 40% of the mycelial growth of E. sorghinum at 16 mg mL-1 (p≤0.05) without reducing its sporulation (p≥0.05).

Acknowledgments

To sector project number 263188 SEMARNAT- CONACYT “Caracterización física, química y biológica del maguey sacatoro (Agave angustifolia Haw) para su aprovechamiento sustentable en la región comprendida entre los municipios de Chilapa y Huitzuco, Gro. Cuenca del Balsas”.

Literature cited

Achimón F, Brito VD, Pizzolitto RP, Ramirez-Sanchez A, Gomez EA and Zygadlo JA. 2020. Chemical composition and antifungal properties of commercial essential oils against the maize phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium verticillioides. Revista Argentina de Microbiología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2020.12.001 [ Links ]

Ahumada-Santos YP, Montes-Ávila J, Uribe-Beltrán M. de J, Díaz-Camacho SP, López-Angulo G, Vega-Aviña R and Delgado-Vargas F. 2013. Chemical characterization, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities of six Agave species from Sinaloa, Mexico. Industrial Crops and Products 49:143-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.050 [ Links ]

Asael RGH, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, de Jesus RGS and Angelica FPA. 2018. Antifungal activity of mexican endemic plants on agricultural phytopathogens: a review. XIV International Engineering Congress (CONIIN), Engineering Congress (CONIIN), 2018 XIV International.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIIN.2018.8489793 [ Links ]

Barrientos Rivera G, Esparza Ibarra EL, Segura Pacheco HR, Talavera Mendoza O, Sampedro Rosas ML and Hernández Castro E. 2019. Caracterización morfológica de Agave angustifolia y su conservación en Guerrero, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 10(3): 655-668. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i3.1554 [ Links ]

Bui NT, Pham TLT, Nguyen KT, Le PH and Kim KH. 2021. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Avicennia officinalis. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry 12(2): 2678-2690. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC122.26782690 [ Links ]

Camacho-Campos C, Pérez-Hernández Y, Valdivia-Ávila A, Rubio-Fontanills and Fuentes-Alfonso L. 2020. Evaluación fitoquímica, antibacteriana y molusquicida de extractos de hojas de Agave spp. Revista Cubana de Química 32(3): 390-405. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352712851_Evaluacion_fitoquimica_antibacteriana_y_molusquicida_de_extractos_de_hojas_de_Agave_spp/link/619ba7423068c54fa5114323/downloadLinks ]

da Silva, PPM, de Oliveira J, Biazotto A dos M, Parisi MM, da Glória EM and Spoto MHF. 2020. Essential oils from Eucalyptus staigeriana F. Muell. Ex Bailey and Eucalyptus urograndis W. Hill ex Maiden associated to carboxymethyl cellulose coating for the control of Botrytis cinerea Pers, Fr. and Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrend, Fr) Vuill in strawberries. Industrial Crops and Products 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112884 [ Links ]

De la Cruz-Ricardez D, Ortiz-García CF, Lagunes-Espinoza L del C and Torres de la Cruz, M. 2020. Efecto antifúngico de extractos metanólicos de Capsicum spp. en Moniliophthora roreri. Agro-Ciencia 54(6): 813-824. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v54i6.2186 [ Links ]

De Oliveira FJG, Silva G da C, Cipriano L, Gomes M and Egea MB. 2021. Control of postharvest fungal diseases in fruits using external application of RNAi. Journal of Food Sciences 86 (8): 3341-3348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15816 [ Links ]

De Rodríguez DJ, García RR, Castillo FDH, González CNA, Galindo AS, Quintanilla JAV and Zuccolotto LEM. 2011. In vitro antifungal activity of extracts of Mexican Chihuahuan Desert plants against postharvest fruit fungi. Industrial Crops and Products 34(1): 960-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.001 [ Links ]

El-Hawary SS, El-Kammar HA, Farag MA, Saleh DO and El Dine RS. 2020. Metabolomic profiling of five Agave leaf taxa via UHPLC/PDA/ESI-MS in relation to their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and ulceroprotective activities. Steroids 160: 108648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2020.108648 [ Links ]

García-Mendoza AJ. 2007. Los Agaves de México. Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de México 87: 14-23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/644/64408704.pdfLinks ]

González-Álvarez M, Moreno-Limón S, Salcedo-Martínez S and Pérez-Rodríguez E. 2015. In vitro evaluation of antifungal activity of Agave (Agave scabra Salm Dyck) extracts against post-harvest mushrooms. Phyton Revista Internacional de Botánica Experimental 84(1):427-434. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/phyton/v84n2/v84n2a23.pdfLinks ]

González-Madariaga Y, Mena-Linares Y, Martín-Monteagudo D, Valido-Díaz A, Guerra-de-León JO and Nieto-Reyes L. 2020. In vivo anti-inflammatory effect of saponin-enriched fraction from Agave brittoniana Trel subspecie brachypus. Ars Pharmaceutica (Internet) 61(4): 231-237. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/ars/v61n4/2340-9894-ars-61-04-231.pdfLinks ]

Iñiguez-Covarrubias G, Díaz-Teres R, Sanjuan-Dueñas R, Anzaldo-Hernández J and Rowell R. 2001. Utilization of by-products from the tequila industry, part 2: potential value of Agave tequilana Weber azul leaves. Bioresource Technology 77(2): 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00167-X [ Links ]

Ito S, Ihara T, Tamura H, Tanaka S, Ikeda T, Kajihara H, Dissanayake C, Abdel-Motaal FF and El-Sayed MA. 2007. α- tomatina, the major saponin in tomato, induces programmed cell death mediated by reactive oxygen species in the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. FEBS Letters 58(17), 3217-3222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.010 [ Links ]

Jain A, Sarsaiya S, Wu Q, Lu Y and Shi J. 2019. A review of plants leaf fungal diseases and it environmental speciation. Bioengineered 10(1): 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2019.1649520 [ Links ]

Jin YS. 2019. Recent advances in natural antifungal flavonoids and their derivatives. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 29(19): 126589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.07.048 [ Links ]

Juárez B, Sosa M and López M. 2010. Hongos fitopatógenos de alta importancia económica: descripción y métodos de control. Temas Selectos de Ingeniería de Alimentos 4: 14-23. https://www.udlap.mx/WP/tsia/files/No4-Vol-2/TSIA-4(2)-Juarez-Becerra-et-al-2010.pdfLinks ]

Lagrouh F, Dakka N and Bakri Y. 2017. The antifungal activity of Moroccan plants and the mechanism of action of secondary metabolites from plants. Journal of Mycologie Médicale 27(3): 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.04.008 [ Links ]

López-Salazar H, Camacho-Díaz BH, Ávila-Reyes SV, Pérez-García MD, González-Cortázar M, Arenas Ocampo ML and Jiménez-Aparicio AR. 2019. Identification and quantification of β-sitosterol β-D-glucoside of an ethanolic extract obtained by microwave-assisted extraction from Agave angustifolia Haw. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 24(21): 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213926 [ Links ]

Lozano-Muñiz S, García S, Heredia N and Castro-Franco R. 2011. Species of Agave induces morphological changes in Aspergillus parasiticus Speare and Aspergillus flavus Link ex Fries. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 9(2): 767-770. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215484700Links ]

Maharshi A and Thaker V. 2014. Antifungal activity of Agave species from Gujarat, India. 423-430 Pp. In: In: Kharwar R, Upadhyay R, Dubey N, Raghuwanshi R (eds). Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology in Food Security. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1801-2_37 [ Links ]

Mui Yun Wong, Hamid S, Iskandar Shah NA and Ab Razak NH. 2020. Botanical extracts as biofungicides against fungal pathogens of rice. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 43(4): 457-466. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.43.4.03 [ Links ]

Nachilima C, Chigeza G, Chibanda M, Mushoriwa H, Diers BD, Murithi HM and Hartman GL. 2020. Evaluation of foliar diseases for soybean entries in the Pan-African trials in Malawi and Zambia. Plant Diseases 104(8): 2068-2073. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-19-2617-SR [ Links ]

Ortiz-Martínez EL, Robles-Yerena L, Leyva-Mir GS, Camacho-Tapia M and Juárez-Rodríguez L. 2022. Fusarium sp., causal agent of vascular wilt in citrus and its sensitivity to fungicides, Mexican Journal of Phytopathology 4(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2106-3 [ Links ]

Palma-Guerrero J, Chancellor T, Spong J, Canning G, Hammond J, McMilla VE and Hammond-Kosack KE. 2021. Take-all diseases: New insights into an important wheat root pathogen. Trends in Plant Science 26 (8): 836-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.009 [ Links ]

Pavarini DP, Pavarini SP, Niehues M and Lopes N. 2012. Exogenous influences on plant secondary metabolites levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 176 (1-4): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.002 [ Links ]

Pereira GM, Ribeiro MG, da Silva BP and Parente JP. 2017. Structural characterization of a new steroidal saponin from Agave angustifolia var. Marginata and preliminary investigation of its in vivo antiulcerogenic activity and in vitro membrane permeability property. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 27 (18): 4345-4349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.08.026 [ Links ]

Salazar-Pineda DT, Castro-Alarcón N, Moreno-Godínez ME, Nicasio-Torres MP, Pérez-Hernández J and Álvarez-Fitz P. 2017. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity of extracts and fractions from Agave cupreata. International Journal of Pharmacology 13: 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2017.1063.1070 [ Links ]

Siddhapura S, Maharshi A and Thaker V. 2011. Varietal difference in antifungal activity of some species of Agave. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44(2): 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400902952087 [ Links ]

Soto-Castro D, Santiago-García PA, Vásquez-López A, Sánchez-Heraz F, Vargas-Mendoza Y and Gaítan-Hernández R. 2021. Effect of ethanolic extracts from Agave potatorum Zucc leaves in the mycelial growth of Pleurotus spp. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture (EJFA) 33(3):228-236. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i3.2664 [ Links ]

Tapia-Quirós P, Martínez-Téllez MA, Ávila-Quezada GD and Vargas-Arispuro I. 2020. Inhibición de endo-1,3-β-glucanasa fúngica por compuestos fenólicos aislados de Turnera diffusa: una alternativa para antifúngicos convencionales. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 38(1):160-169. https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.1911-3 [ Links ]

United Nations. 2019. How certain are the United Nations global population projections?. Population Facts. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Links ]

Urbina CJF, Casas A, Martínez-Díaz Y, Santos-Zea L and Gutiérrez-Uribe JA. 2018. Domestication and saponins contents in a gradient of management intensity of Agaves: Agave cupreata, A. inaquides and A. hookeri in central Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution; An International Journal 65(4):1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0601-6 [ Links ]

Yan YF, Yang CJ, Shang XF, Zhao ZM, Liu YQ, Zhou R, Liu H, Wu TL, Zhao WB, Wang YL, Hu GF, Qin F, He YH, Li HX and Du SS. 2020. Bioassay guided isolation of two antifungal compounds from Magnolia officinalis and the mechanism of action of honokiol. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104705 [ Links ]

Zaynab M, Sharif Y, Abbas S, Afzal MZ, Qasim M, Khalofah A, Ansari MJ, Khan KA, Tao L and Li S. 2021. Saponin toxicity as key player in plant defense against pathogens. Toxicon 193: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.01.009 [ Links ]

Zhao S, Guo Y, Wang Q and An B. 2021. Antifungal effects of lycorina on Botrytis cinerea and posible mechanisms. Biotechnology Letters 43(7): 1503-1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-021-03128-8 [ Links ]

Zubrod JP, Bundschunh M, Arts G, Knäbel A, Payraudeaus S, Rasmussen JJ, Rohr J, Scharmüller A, Smalling K, Sehle S, Schulz R and Schäfer RB. 2019. Fungicides: An overlooked pesticide class?. Environmental Science and Technology 53(7):3347-3365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04392 [ Links ]

Received: February 25, 2022; Accepted: April 08, 2022

* Corresponding author: palvarezfi@conacyt.mx.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License