SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número especialEconomía del sector agrícola mexicano en tiempos COVID-19Organismos benéficos en cultivos agrícolas: Hacia una producción de alimentos sanos e inocuos en respuesta a COVID-19 y futuras sindemias índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8080versión impresa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.39 no.spe Texcoco  2021  Epub 30-Nov-2022

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2021-7 

COVID-19 and Agrofood Security

Microbial genetic resources in food security to face COVID-19 pandemic

Lily Xochilt Zelaya-Molina1 

Sergio de los Santos-Villalobos2 

Ismael Fernando Chávez-Díaz1  * 

Liliana Carolina Córdova-Albores3 

1 Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos-INIFAP. Boulevard de la Biodiversidad # 400. Rancho Las Cruces. C.P. 47600. Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México.

2 Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, 5 de febrero 818 Sur, Colonia Centro, C.P. 85000. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México.

3 Escuela de Agronomía, Universidad De La Salle Bajío, Avenida Universidad 602. Colonia Lomas del Campestre C.P. 37150, León, Guanajuato, México.


Abstract.

COVID-19 has had an impact on the regional and worldwide agricultural value chain, jeopardizing food security. It is time to reassess the approach of the agri-food sector and to consider that the food supply and plant health, as agro-systemic services, must depend on strategies with a low impact on productive and environmental assets. One strategy is the use and optimization of microbial genetic resources (MGR) related to agro-ecosystems as a source of balance, functionality, productivity, inhibition of the impact of pests and pathogens, and contribution to the profitability of agri-food activity. It is necessary to strengthen and develop regional agricultural systems that are dynamic, that mitigate damages to the environment and produce nutritional and nutraceutical foods that ensure human health. Agricultural sciences are undergoing changes in scientific paradigms that will benefit the agri-food sector if we are able to learn from the impacts of an extensive technological agriculture. Approaching agriculture from an agro-systemic point of view in which the crop-community is the functional biological unit of study and to preserve the MGR diversity are the greatest challenges to create sustainable and resilient strategies and technologies that contribute towards human health and help prevent risks during health crises such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Key words: SARS-CoV-2; sustainable agriculture; holobiont; microbial diversity; biodiversity; conservation.

Resumen.

La enfermedad COVID-19 ha impactado en la cadena de valor agrícola regional y mundial comprometiendo la seguridad alimentaria. Es momento de replantear el enfoque del sector agroalimentario y considerar que el abastecimiento de alimentos y la sanidad vegetal, como servicios agroecosistémicos, deben depender de estrategias de bajo impacto en los activos productivos y ambientales. Una estrategia es el empleo y optimización de recursos genéticos microbianos (RGM) asociados a los agroecosistemas como fuente de equilibrio, funcionalidad, productividad, inhibición del impacto de plagas y patógenos, y contribución a la rentabilidad de la actividad agroalimentaria. Es necesario potenciar y desarrollar sistemas agrícolas regionales que sean dinámicos, mitiguen daños ambientales y produzcan alimentos con características nutricionales y nutracéuticas que aseguren la salud humana. Las ciencias agrícolas están experimentando cambios de paradigmas científicos que beneficiarán el sector agroalimentario si somos capaces de aprender de los impactos de una agricultura tecnológica extensiva. Abordar la agricultura desde una visión agroecosistémica, donde el cultivo-comunidad sea la unidad biológica funcional de estudio, y conservar la diversidad RGM, constituyen los grandes retos para generar estrategias y tecnologías sustentables y resilientes que contribuyan a la salud humana y coadyuven a la prevención de riesgos ante crisis sanitarias como la actual pandemia COVID-19.

Palabras clave: SARS-CoV-2; agricultura sostenible; holobionte; diversidad microbiana; biodiversidad; conservación

Agricultural production and the pandemic

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), declared the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus as official on March 11th, 2020. The whole world adopted social distancing as the main measure for the prevention of contagion, and the lifestyles of millions of people changed drastically (Cucinotta and Vanelli, 2020). The social and economic sectors were the most affected; however, the greatest challenge has been for the health and agri-food sectors, since they are the engine of a world that seems to have been put on hold (Haleem and Javaid, 2020). The COVID-19 disease currently jeopardizes food security, due to its impact on regional agricultural value chains, causing an imbalance between the demand and availability of food (FAO, 2020a). The situation worsens if we consider that the current agri-food system scenario is not sustainable and its weakening is a risk factor per se and in regard to the health of the world’s inhabitants (FAO et al., 2020).

Currently, agri-food production is based on the excessive use of synthetic and/or biologically manipulated inputs (Chávez-Díaz et al., 2020; FAO, 2020b; FAO et al., 2020; Francis, 2020; Siche, 2020), producing intense socioeconomic and environmental impacts that jeopardize food security and self-sufficiency:

  • - Imbalance in the microbial and plant biodiversity in agro-ecosystems, making food production difficult.

  • - Generation of resistance in phytopathogens, pests and weeds, and in human pathogens, which limit the yields of crops and puts human health at risk.

  • - Limitation in the mitigation and resilience to climate change.

  • - Continuous increase of the cost of agricultural inputs that directly affect the costs of fresh and processed foods, reducing the purchasing power of the world’s population.

  • - Increase in the economic and social polarization in detriment to small-scale agriculture.

  • - Deficient diets with inadequate foods or with traces of agrochemicals (food innocuousness), putting several sectors of the population at risk.

The ongoing pandemic forces us to reflect upon the lifestyle humanity has adapted and the way in which we relate to nature and agro-ecosystems, as well as to implement alternatives that lead to environmental and social well-being. This document discusses a reassessment of the agri-food sector in the light of the world COVID-19 health crisis, based on the premise of food provision as an agro-ecosystemic service. It centers on plant health, one of the main technological and scientific areas in the wholesome production of food, and on the potential of microbial genetic resources (MGR) applied to biological control as a source of balance, functionality, productivity and profitability of agri-food activities.

The biological component in agri-food production

Agroecosystems, artificial ecosystems closely associated to the biological activity of the soil-related microbiota (Sahu et al., 2017), and to plant microbiome, provide ecosystemic services such as pest regulation, pollination, nutrient cycling, climate regulation, soil conservation, supplying water, and the production of foods and materials, by means of a complex network of interactions between microorganisms, plants, animals, environmental conditions and agricultural practices (Power, 2010). This process, known as the functionality of agro-ecosystems, depends directly on the soil biodiversity (Saleem et al., 2019) and ensures that, for each type of crop and its specific conditions, there is a key community of microorganisms in charge of the functionality of the agro-ecosystem. This is conceived as a microbiome (Whipps et al., 1988). Currently, from an agri-food point of view, a microbiome is the set of microorganisms, their functional genetic material, ecological niches and the product of its interactions in an agri-food habitat, under certain conditions in a specific moment; understanding, however, that the ‘moment’ is a product of the complex relations established in time. The microbiomes have a close relation with the biotope that, under the influence of abiotic factors throughout time, result in a functional biological unit, or a holobiont (Berg et al., 2020; Hassani et al., 2018). Holobionts have co-evolved with their environment throughout time, adapting to adverse weather conditions and to pathogens, therefore their study represents a source of opportunities to achieve food security, mitigate and adapt to climate change and the control of diseases (Altieri and Nicholls, 2020; Dhar and Mohanty, 2020; Simon et al., 2019; Thomashow et al., 2018). However, a holobiont may be severely affected by agrochemicals and pesticides such as bromomethante (a banned biocide), glyphosate, carbamates and others. In this way, the productivity of the agri-food sector and the preservation of the means of production depend on the fine balance between the characteristics of the crop in association with its microbiome, based on the environmental conditions and the management of the agro-ecosystem (e.g., cultural practices, varieties used, etc.).

Human well-being and the microbial diversity in agro-ecosystems

Scientific evidence from the past 30 years correlates health conditions and diseases of human, animals and plants, and environmental deterioration with their respective microbial diversity (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Song et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2019; Park, 2018; Singh and Trivedi, 2017; Wall et al., 2015; Cox et al., 2013; Berendsen et al., 2012; Heller and Zavaleta 2009; Turnbaugh et al., 2007).

The microbial diversity of agro-ecosystems has a direct impact on human health, since it is implied in multiple biological and productive processes and factors (Figure 1):

Figure 1 Impact of biodiversity and sustainable agriculture on human health. 

  • - It increases agricultural yield. It regulates plant growth factors, facilitates the acquisition of nutrients and favors resilience to adverse environmental conditions (Saleem et al., 2019).

  • - It promotes plant health by regulating plant pathogen populations and stimulating the defense system of plants (Trivedi et al., 2020).

  • - It promotes the functionality of agro-ecosystems by improving the efficiency of nutrient cycles (Griebler and Avramov, 2015).

  • - It conditions, improves and preserves the productive capacity and the functionality of soils (Saleem et al., 2019; Wagg et al., 2014).

  • - Participating in the retention of water and having a direct bearing on the quality of soils, water and air for its ability to biodegrade toxic compounds (Subedi et al., 2020; Wall et al., 2015).

  • - Limiting the microbial load or the proliferation of harmful pathogens to humans and animals in fresh foods. It can be established as a part of the gut microbiota, helping to modulate immune and inflammatory responses (Belkaid and Hand, 2014).

  • It has an impact on the nutritional and nutraceutical contents of foods (Chandra et al., 2020).

  • - It constitutes a source of molecules of biotechnological, pharmaceutical and industrial interest (Rana et al., 2019).

The increase in the microbial diversity in agro-ecosystems related to yield and plant health (Singh et al., 2020; Trivedi et al., 2020), to the beneficial impact of probiotics (Infusino et al., 2020; Song et al., 2019; Cox et al., 2013) and of foods with adequate nutritional and nutraceutical characteristics for human health (Mercado-Mercado et al., 2020; Ramírez-Vega et al., 2020; Stanisavljevic et al., 2020) are strategies that can translate into resilience and stability for the prevention of diseases, and even against unfavorable contingencies such as the ongoing pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Age, gender, chronic diseases, medications, and lifestyle are some of the risk factors for the state of COVID-19 to become serious (Chidambaram et al., 2020). The nutritional state of people, derived from diets based on wholesome, quality foods along with nutritional supplements have been considered crucial in clinical responses to COVID-19, since they have a direct effect on the modulation of the immune system and inflammatory responses, weakening the impacts of the disease (Aman and Masood, 2020; Dhar and Mohanty, 2020; Infusino et al., 2020; Rishi et al., 2020). In this context, and in the light of the implications of chronic cardiovascular and metabolic diseases on the clinical seriousness of COVID-19, the National Public Health Institute, appointed by the Mexican Secretariat of Health, managed to promote the labelling of foods with a regulation that became effective on October 1st, 2020, as a strategy to promote healthy eating (Editor’s note). It is therefore unquestionable that the agri-food sector and the production of foods play an essential part in human health, in preventing diseases and the mitigation of health emergencies such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Dysbiosis in the technified agricultural model

Dysbiosis is a state in which microbiota is unbalanced, the key niches are not covered and the complex network of interactions of the agricultural ecosystem is not functional, leading to a state of illness (Olesen and Alm, 2016). In this context, technified agri-food production, based on the implementation of synthetic inputs to eliminate plant pathogens, has made the situation worse since, along with pest organisms, it also eliminates or affects the beneficial microbiota, and in many cases, it produces resistance in microorganisms it intends to eliminate (Thanner et al., 2016). This strong disruption contributes to mutagenic processes in the microorganisms, which contributes, in some environmental conditions, to their abrupt or explosive increase, leading to an environmental imbalance (Figure 2).

Hosts and microorganisms have coevolved in time to reach highly specialized symbiotic relations. Both symbionts, immersed in the evolutionary race, have developed “collaborative” or defense mechanisms (hosts) and mechanisms that help them adapt (microorganisms) as mutualists or pathogens (Hassani et al., 2018; Matveeva et al., 2018). This coevolution is limited or strengthened by environmental and anthropogenic conditions, and it has a considerable effect on the balance between populations with a higher degree of selective pressure. In this way, hosts, microorganisms and other living beings related to the ecological niche are subjected to a continuous adaptation, necesary to define their role in the agro-ecosystem (Thrall et al., 2011) (Figure 2). The main element of the process of coevolution is genetic reciprocity; i.e., when an organism develops a trait as an adaptive response towards a factor that affects its biological aptitude, the biological counterpart will respond by generating another trait or traits which will allow them to adapt to the new trait developed by the first organism, and so on (McDonald, 2004). The generation of these traits or phenotypes is ruled by different evolutionary forces (Zhan, 2016; McDonald, 2004), thus hosts, microorganisms and other organisms related to agricultural systems coevolve, adapting to their surroundings if anthropomorphic action guarantees time as a factor of evolution. Under conditions of biodiversity and ecological balance, for every trait generated, other traits are produced which weaken it and a balance or state of health can be maintained. Under conditions of dysbiosis, such as the ones presented in a technified agricultural system, there are ecological gaps (e.g., those caused by agrochemicals), which cause the survival of a small group of individuals, which find ways to feed themselves, eventually leading to a state of imbalance or state of disease (Figure 2). In addition, cultural practices and the accelerated biological cycles of technified agriculture, along with the impact of urbanization, pollution and climate change on it exert great selective pressure on certain groups of benefitial organisms, making their establishment difficult in both micro and macroenvironments (Figure 2) (Tooker et al., 2020). When analyzing the technified agri-food sector under this perspective, it is pardoxical to ask why there are currently human, animal and plant pathogens that are resistant to multiple factors, which become more and more difficult to control with every production cycle (Tooker et al., 2020; Brown and Tillier, 2011). It is necessary to distinguish between technified productive systems, generally extensive monocultures, some of which have transgenic varieties (e.g. glyphosate-resistant soybeans or maize that has become pest-resistant due to the use of gene Bt) and traditional, subsistence or organic ones, which have a lower or null impact on soil and plant microbial systems (Editor’s note).

Figure produced by the author, based on the schemes by Zhan (2016) and Agrios (2005).

Figure 2 Effects of the co-evolution in the agroecosystems on the states of biodiversity and of dysbiosis.  

Agri-food production models for nutrition and health

Since the so-called Green Revolution, agriculture has obtained higher yields using techniques that cause an economic and social imbalance (Chávez-Díaz et al., 2020). Production yield has increased using water technologies, nutrients, weed and pathogen control, and the use of varieties that are generally resistant to biotic and abiotic factors. However, productivity and the development of agriculture to guarantee world food security (Ecker et al., 2011) forces us to search for productive models and technologies based on the use of alternatives, which not only maintain the balance of the microbiota of the agrosystem, but also increase crop yields, inhibit the growth of pests and diseases in plants, allow the conservation of natural productive assets, contribute to caring for the environment and benefit humanity from a comprehensive scheme, including respect for the productive knowledge and cultural values. These models include organic agriculture, synchronous agricultural production, polyculture or mixed crop systems, minimal tilling, no tilling, and the use of composting technology, the improvement of soils with beneficial microorganisms, biopesticides, nanoparticles or plant extracts, and others (Figure 2).

Synchronic farming communities offer a better management of resources, the conservation of means of production and the environment, and they are economically and socially responsible, since they provide local and international distribution chains with stability and resilience (Marsden and Smith, 2005). The pragmatic application of this approach is represented in rural cooperatives with variations, depending on the productive philosophy.

Organic agriculture avoids the use of synthetic inputs and is based mainly on crop rotations, the use of animal manure (e.g., chicken manure, bovine manure, etc.) and crop residues as soil improvement and nutrient-mobilizing and plant-protecting biological systems (Patle et al., 2020).

Conventional tilling modifies the structure of the soil surface and the continuity of porous space and reduces the content of organic matter, therefore it drastically reduces microbiota related to the agricultural ecosystem (Alonso-Báez et al., 2011). Other types of tilling have been evaluated to understand the benefits they provide to the stability of the soil microbiota; particularly minimum tilling, which maintains a greater richness and uniformity of the microbial community, as well as a functional diversity of microorganisms involved in biogeochemical cycles (Legrand et al., 2018).

Composts are organic amendement that stimulate microbiological process for the decomposition of organic matter when used as a source of carbon and energy. The main benefits of carbon are the supply of nutrients, carbon sequestration, the induction of pest and pathogen suppressiveness, the improvement of soil structure, biodiversity, retention of soil moisture and reduction of soil erosion, and the increase of enzyme activity and microbial biomass, all of which contributes towards the increase of crop yields (Martínez-Blanco et al., 2013). Regarding the use of secondary metabolites and nanoparticles as biological control products, there is imprecise or contrasting information on the effect of these products on the composition of microbiota related to the soil. However, one can assume that they exert some type of modification with a still unevaluated scope.

The integration of strategies is a logical alternative, but it requires the scientific backup to optimize the cost-benefit. The combination of conservation agriculture, bioproducts, composts, nanoparticles or plant extracts under an organic agriculture model has displayed promising effects. The study, validation and implementation of the combination of several alternative techniques in agricultural production is a field of action that can be developed to generate a sustainable form of agriculture, considering the nutritional and health needs of the population. However, public research planning and investment policies must foster technological development for sustainable agriculture, that is, creating or optimizing dynamic regional agricultural systems that mitigate or eliminate environmental damages related to technified agriculture and that prioritize the production of sufficient food with nutritional and nutraceutical characteristics that ensure human health (Goicochea and Antolín, 2017). The purpose is to position agriculture within a holistic context and recover its humanistic condition (Horrigan et al., 2002). However, it is worth acknowledging the great political, governmental and geoeconomic challenges to be overcome on a global, national and local scale, for both the design and implementation of a more sustainable agri-food development (Antle and Ray, 2020).

Microbial genetic resources for a sustainable agriculture

One out of every nine people in the world (820 million) suffers from chronic starvation and over 2 million suffer nutritional deficiency (Usher et al., 2020). In addition to this, the COVID-19 pandemic has further destabilized global food production and food security (Khan et al., 2020). In this sense, the current interruption in the continuous food supply is an enormous problem, due to the risk of contagion of SARS-CoV-2 among the staff hired for the harvest, processing, transportation and distribution of food (Henry et al., 2020). The same applies for people who operate the production and supply of inputs needed for agriculture, leading to shortages of such as glass, cardboard and wood needed for containers and packaging, as well as of fuels, fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, seeds, etc. (Marlow et al., 2020). This has led to reduced incomes for producers, fluctuations in prices and instability in the supply of basic foods, severely affecting nutrition worldwide, and a reduction of up to 22% of the global market.

Thus, the creation and use of easy-access, efficient, economically feasible, socially fair and sustainable agro-biotechnology developed by the same countries is decisive for the production of foods of high nutritional quality and the reduction of vulnerable groups, which would guarantee food security and national sovereignty. Among the most promising strategies are the use of the genetic and metabolic diversity of the microbial genetic resources (MGR) found in agro-ecosystems. This microbiota, as mentioned earlier, is an important component to maintain the chemical and biological fertility of the soil. Inside the microbiota is a group of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms (PGPM) (Valenzuela-Aragon et al., 2019), which interact with the crops through direct and/or indirect action mechanisms, regulating their growth, the production and quality of products by increasing the tolerance of plants to abiotic and biotic stress, improving their nutrition and generating antagonism against phytopathogens and some root pests.

Nowadays, and in the light of the ongoing pandemic, the use of PGPM is an efficient and sustainable alternative for the agricultural sector (Chávez-Díaz et al., 2020). The beneficial effect of PGPM on crops is a result of several microbial interaction mechanisms with plants, the main ones of which are (Valenzuela-Ruiz et al., 2018; Villarreal-Delgado et al., 2018):

  • - The biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen

  • - The solubilization of minerals

  • - The induction of plant growth regulators

  • - The mineralization of organic compounds

  • - The production of antibiotics

  • - The production of hydrolytic enzymes

  • - The biosynthesis of siderophores

  • - The production of exopolysaccharides

  • - The induction of systemic responses

The use of PGPM has been proven to lead to increases in the productivity and quality of foods, reducing economic and environmental costs produced by the increased use of synthetic agricultural inputs. For example, Adesemoye et al. (2009) inoculated a microbial consortium composed of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Glomus intraradices on tomato, (Solanum sp.) planted with 25% less than the recommended amount of fertilizer with a similar effect to the conventional fertilization dose. This consortium improved crop growth, yield, and nutrient absorption (nitrogen and phosphorous). On the other hand, Bakhshandeh et al. (2017) reported that the inoculation of Pantoea ananatis, Rahnella aquatilis and Enterobacter sp. on rice (Oryza sp.) seeds significantly increased plant height, foliar biomass and potassium absorption in leaves, stem and root. Similarly, Robles-Montoya et al. (2020) reported that the inoculation of Bacillus cabrialesii, B. paralicheniformis and B. subtilis on wheat (Triticum sp.) seedlings significantly increased the length and dry weight of the aerial section, root length, stem diameter and the biovolume index. Similar results were found in B. megaterium and B. paralicheniformis (Rojas-Padilla et al., 2020).

The use of the crop-related microbial biodiversity through the MGR of the planet is a sustainable alternative to boost food production with a high nutritional value, in the light of the problems related to the ongoing pandemic. In this sense, the preservation of MGRs is decisive to preserve the beneficial microbiota found in agro-ecosystems and to provide authentic, stable and biosafe biological material for the development of efficient microbial inoculants (Díaz-Rodríguez et al., 2021).

Conservation of microbial genetic resources

The conservation of microbial genetic resources (MGR) is crucial to provide relevant technological solutions to the problems faced by human society. The current and future use of these resources is the most important activity of conservation centers, germplasm banks and collections of macro and microorganisms, by means of in situ, ex situ, and in-factory conservation procedures and strategies, mainly in world crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Khoury et al., 2010; Mishra et al., 2020; Sung and Hwang, 2015). Mexico has made an effort, in the past 20 years, to establish conservation and investigation centers or laboratories with high-end, specialized human resources (Ayala-Zepeda et al., 2021, in this section) (Figures 3, 4). This effort includes the National Genetic Resource Center of the National Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research Center (Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, or CNRG-INIFAP). The CNRG is the first center of its kind in Mexico with the mission of conserving and preserving the MGR of the country related to the agri-food sector to guarantee the well-being of present and future generations. It has been estimated that the CNRG will be the world’s most complete beneficial microbe and plant germplasm bank in the world (SADER, 2016) (Figure 3).

The activities of the Microbial Genetic Resources Laboratory (Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos Microbianos) of the CNRG-INIFAP include the constant search for microbial genetic resources of agricultural interest, which are characterized and identified using different microbiological techniques, valued for their possible agrobiotecnological use or as taxonomic reference material, and the study of biodiversity in the agroecosystems from the application of omic sciences.

Fifty percent of the planet’s living biomass is said to be of microbial nature, and although its empirical use has existed for millennia, its systematic study began in the late 19th century with L. Pasteur, R. Koch. F. Cohn, A De Bary, G.A. Hansen and others, motivated by diseases and epidemics in plants, humans and animals (Mora-Aguilera et al., 2021 in Section 1). The etiological transition to technology implied escalating the cultivation of microorganisms in specialized laboratories to generate biotechnological developments applicable to agriculture (Desmeth, 2017). In this context, an MGR can be defined as any microbial strain that is authenticated, taxonomically defined, physiologically characterized, with quality control, well-documented and with real or potential value (Sharma et al., 2018) (Figure 4). The 758 collections registered in the World Data Center for Microorganisms (WDCM)(http://www.wdcm.org/) facilitate the study of MGRs, since they help find taxonomic reference material and systematize archives on microbial biological diversity in the wide symbiotic spectrum.

Figure 3 The National Genetic Resource Center of the National Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research Center (Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, or CNRG-INIFAP), created to preserve and protect the beneficial microbe and plant biodiversity related to the Mexican agri-food sector. Researchers of the Microbial Genetic Resources Laboratory (Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos Microbianos) working on the identification of agriculturally important fungi and the conservation of plant growth-promoting bacteria. 

Most of these biological resource conservation centers follow the guidelines of the World Federation for Culture Collections (WFCC) ( http://www.wfcc.info/), the practices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ( https://www.oecd.org/), and the regulations for the access and donation of biological organisms of the Nagoya Protocol on the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (https://www.cbd.int/abs/), as well as depositing the inventories of their collections in the Global Catalogue of Microorganisms (GCM) (http://gcm.wdcm.org/) to promote the visibility and accessibility of the strains that these centers conserve (Pilling et al., 2020).

The CBD, the international instrument for the conservation of biological diversity, acquires great relevance in these moments, considering that all evidence indicates that the ongoing biodiversity crisis is one of the main factors in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 (Hossain et al., 2020). Furthermore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operation and the conservation status of genetic resources worldwide has undergone scarce evaluation and it is too soon to evaluate its effects (Neupane, 2020). However, both positive and negative consequences are expected, mainly on the inclusion of considerations on human health in the planning of land use, the strengthening of links between health and biological diversity to support preventive health approaches, as well as the development of biodiversity legislation, regulation and management aspects in the face of future crises (Bang and Khadakkar, 2020). For example, the diversity of coronaviruses in bats, as a strategy for the prevention of diseases in humans, has been studied for over 10 years, motivated by the emergence of zoonotic diseases SARS-CoV (2003) and MERS-CoV (2012). However, the importance of studies on diversity for human health is now unquestionable, therefore national and international programs for their study have been created or strengthened (Editor’s note).

Figure 4 Mexican microbial strains in the process of characterization for their incorporation into the Collection of Microorganisms of the CNRG INIFAP. A) Pseudomonas sp. with lipolytic ability; B) Trichoderma sp. with lignolytic ability; C) culture of Bacillus subtilis; D) Pseudomonas fluorescens under ultraviolet light; E) Pseudomonas protegens with phosphate-solublilizing ability; F) Structures of Trichoderma sp. observed under the microscope; G) Trichoderma sp. with plant growth-promoting ability; H) Bacillus sp. reducing the growth of Fusarium sp; I) Bacillus amilolyquefaciens; J) Fusarium boothii culture; K) Trichoderma sp. with cellulolytic ability; L) Pseudomonas sp. reducing the growth of Aspergillus sp; M) Preliminary exploratory study of metatranscriptome related to chili pepper plants (Capsicum sp). 

The COVID-19 pandemic puts into perspective the importance of preserving MGR with potential for food security, which involves in vivo microbiota and the genomic, proteomic and metabolomic archives. However, there are still knowledge gaps related to the diversity of microorganisms in agro-ecosystems, the identification and characterization of species of diverse taxonomic and functional groups, the biological mechanisms in interaction processes, the participation of MGRs in the supply of services in agro-ecosystems and agri-food production, as well as the effect of climate and microenvironmental changes produced by agricultural practices and the use of synthetic inputs (Sandoval-Cancino et al., 2022; Córdova-Albores et al., 2021; Pilling et al., 2020). On the other hands, the biodiversity of MGRs is dwindling in agro-ecosystems due to the destruction of habitats, the inadequate use of pesticides, the effects of climate change, and others (FAO, 2019). In this context, MGR conservation centers provide valuable biological resources for agricultural, agro-industrial scientists and farmers, since they keep and provide strains or isolations of beneficial microorganisms for different agricultural crops and plantations, authentic reference strains with taxonomic value for research purposes. The development of human resources with an expertise in classic and molecular microbiological management, as well as in the comprehension of plant-microorganism interactions is also a fundamental contribution (Díaz-Rodríguez et al., 2021; Soltanighias et al., 2018).

Apart from the previsions implemented worldwide on the importance of the conservation of MGRs in emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, dissemination on the role MGRs play in the food security of each country is necessary, implementing participatory channels throughout the productive, academic and commercial sectors involved in guaranteeing the regional agricultural produce. The AgroEvent ‘Productos biológicos; una herramienta para potenciar el campo mexicano’ (Biological products; a tool to strengthen the Mexican countryside), organized by the INIFAP and the Technological Institute of Sonora (Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora) on November 27th, 2020, and its second edition ‘Microorganismos para el Desarrollo sostenible del sector agropecuario de México’ (Microorganisms for the Sustainable Development of the Mexican Agricultural Sector) illustrates this strategy (http://cmcnrg.inifap.gob.mx/agroevento/; t.ly/RjAh). Its aim was to provide a space to connect and to disseminate information on the use of biological products in agriculture and the importance of effective cost-benefit technologies for the sustainable innovation of technified agricultural production in Mexico. The event, in its two editions, had the institutional participation of Mexican scientists involved in the development and conservation of organisms with a potential for biological control and the implementation of sustainable and profitable agrobiotechnologies for different productive actors. The dissemination of the event via different media led to an attendance of 1,582 people from eight Latin American countries. This indicates the great interest and potential of MGR in agriculture and the vitality of this activity in times of COVID-19.

Conclusions

This document reassessed the role of the agri-food sector in the light of the current world crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the premise that the supply of food for the world’s population, along with plant health as an essential activity to achieve an optimum yield, are ecosystemic services that rely broadly on the microbiota of the soil and agro-ecosystems, we can argue that biodiversity translates into balance, functionality, productivity and health. Thus, the suppressiveness of plant pathogens is only one benefit of edaphic microbiota. On the other hand, some microorganisms in agroecosystems integrate into the human gut microbiota, contributing towards the prevention of diseases due to their implication in the modulation of responses of immune system and inflammatory responses. For several years, technified agriculture has been considered unsustainable due to the deterioration of the production assets (water, soil, plants) at a higher speed than that at which it can regenerate. The excessive dependence on synthetic inputs (pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers) leads to dysbiosis or a rupture in the complex biological systems, resulting in the degradation of the ecosystemic services. As a consequence, the management of pests, diseases and weeds is inefficient and unsustainable. The gaps produced in ecological niches make nutrient cycles difficult, impacting the infertility and conservation of the health of soils. This leads, both in pesticides as in fertilizers, to a vicious circular strategy with a high cost for the farmer, the environment and society. These unfavorable cycles could eventually jeopardize food security and self-sufficiency with a greater effect on communities and countries with a great dependence on external inputs. This became evident with the breakage of the supply chain of agricultural inputs and products due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is still possible to argue that human health and agricultural productivity can depend on the functionality of agro-ecosystems and on the balance of its biodervisity. The mission of agri-food sciences is to face agriculture with a social and humanistic vision, and in our area of biotechnology, to preserve MGRs and contribute to plant health from an ecological point of view. The study approach must usderstand the agroecosystems as functional biological units or agricultural holobionts for the creation of sustainable and resilient biotechnolgy strategies to prevent production crises and to mitigate emerging impacts such as the ongoing pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. All countries must generate public policies and invest in research under this sustainable agricultural vision. It is our need and our duty in the face of the environmental deterioration worldwide.

Aknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to Dr. Gustavo Mora as editor since his comments and suggestions helped to strengthen this contribution.

Literature cited

Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, and Kloepper JW. 2009. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecololy 58 (4):921-929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y [ Links ]

Alonso-Báez M, and Aguirre-Medina JF. 2011. Efecto de la labranza de conservación sobre las propiedades del suelo. Terra Latinoamicana 29 (2):113-121. [ Links ]

Altieri MA, and Nicholls CI. 2020. Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post COVID-19 agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47:881-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891 [ Links ]

Aman F, and Masood S. 2020. How nutrition can help to fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 36(COVID19-S4):S121-S123. 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2776 [ Links ]

Antle JM, and Ray S. 2020. Pathways to sustainable agricultural development. 167-201 p. In Barret C. (ed) Sustainable Agricultural Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. [ Links ]

Bakhshandeh E, Pirdashti H, and Shahsavarpour LK. 2017. Phosphate and potassium-solubilizing bacteria effect on the growth of rice. Ecological Engineering 103:164-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.03.008. [ Links ]

Bang A, and Khadakkar S. 2020. Opinion: Biodiversity conservation during a global crisis: Consequences and the way forward. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (48):29995-29999. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021460117 [ Links ]

Belkaid Y, and Hand T. 2014. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157:121-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [ Links ]

Berg G, Rybakova D, Fische D, Cernava T, Vergés MCC, Charles T, Chen X, Cocolin L, Eversole K, Corral GH, Kazou M, Kinkel L, Lange L, Lima N, Loy A, Macklin JA, Maguin E, Mauchline T, McClure R, Mitter B, Ryan M, Sarand I, Smidt H, Schelkle B, Roume H, Kiran GS, Selvin J, de Souza RSC, van Overbeek L, Singh BK, Wagner M, Walsh A, Sissitsch A, and Schloter M. 2020. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 8:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 [ Links ]

Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, and Bakker PAHM. 2012. The rizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science. 17:478-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 [ Links ]

Bhavani RV and Gopinath R. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic crisis and the relevance of a farm-system-for-nutrition approach. Food Security. 12:881-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01071-6 [ Links ]

Brown J, and Tillier A. 2011. Bridging the gap between genetics and ecology. Annual Review of Phytopatholy 49:345-67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095301 [ Links ]

Chandra AK, Kumar A, Bharati A, Joshi R, Agrawal A, and Kumar S. 2020. Microbial-assisted and genomic-assisted breeding: a two way approach for the improvement of nutritional quality traits in agricultural crops. 3 Biotech 10:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1994-z [ Links ]

Chávez-Díaz IF, Zelaya-Molina LX, Cruz-Cárdenas CI, Rojas-Anaya E, Ruíz Ramírez S, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2020. Considerations on the use of biofertilizers as a sustainable agro-biotechnological alternative to food security in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 11(6):1423-1436. https://cienciasagricolas.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/publicaciones. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

Chidambaram V, Tun NL, Haque WZ, Majella MG, Sivakumar RK, Kumar A, et al. 2020. Factors associated with disease severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 15(11): e0241541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241541 [ Links ]

Córdova-Albores LC, Zelaya-Molina LX, Ávila-Alistac N, Valenzuela-Ruíz V, Cortés-Martínez NE, Parra-Cota FI, Burgos-Canul YY, Chávez-Díaz IF, Fajardo-FrancoML and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2021. Omics sciences potential on bioprospecting of biological control microbial agents: the case of the Mexican agro-biotechnology. Mexican Journal of Phytopathology 39(1). https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2009-3 [ Links ]

Cox MJ, Cookson WOCM, and Moffatt MF. 2013. Sequencing the human microbiome in health and disease. Human Molecular Genetics. 22:R88-R94. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt398 [ Links ]

Cucinotta D, and Vanelli M. 2020. WHO Declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomedica 91(1):157-160. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397 [ Links ]

Delgado-Baquerizo M, Riech PB, Trivedi C, Eldridge DJ, Abade S, Alfaro FD, Bastida F, Berhe AA, Cutler NA, Gallardo A, García-Velázquez L, Hart SC, Hayes PE, He JZ, Hseu ZY, Hu HW, Kirchmair M, Neuhauser S, Pérez CA, Reed SC, Santos F, Sullivan BW, Trivedi P, Wang JT, Weber-Grullon L, Williams MA, and Singh BK. 2020. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4:210-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y [ Links ]

Desmeth P. 2017. The Nagoya Protocol applied to microbial genetic resources. 205-217 p. In Kurtböke I. (ed). Microbial Resources. Academic Press-Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804765-1.00010-2. [ Links ]

Dhar D, and Mohanty A. 2020. Gut microbiota and COVID-19 possible link and implications. Virus Research. 285:198018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198018 [ Links ]

Díaz-Rodríguez AM, Salcedo-Gastelum LA, Félix-Pablos CA, Parra-Cota FI, Santoyo G, Puente ML, Bhattacharya D, Mukherjee J, de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2021. The current and future role of microbial culture collections in food security worldwide. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.614739 [ Links ]

Ecker O, Breisinger C and Pauw K. 2011. Chapter 6: Growth is good, but is not enough to improve nutrition 47-54 p. In: (Eds) Fan y Pandya-Lorch, Reshaping agriculture for nutrition and health. International Food Policy Research Intitute (IFPRI). USA. https://www.ifpri.org/publication/reshaping-agriculture-nutrition-and-health. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

FAO. 2017. Towards zero hunger and sustainability. The FAO Multipartner Programme Support Mechanism. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/es/c/fa6a801c-5bd4-4522-a2ff-bfbef1e56529/. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

FAO. 2019. The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture (Rome, Italy: FAO), 572p. http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/ca3129en.pdf. [ Links ]

FAO. 2020a. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). http://www.fao.org/2019-ncov/q-and-a/en/. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

FAO. 2020b. World Food Situation: FAO food price index. http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/. (Consulta, diciembre 2020). [ Links ]

FAO. 2020c. Food systems and COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: Contingency plan for an eventual food supply crisis. Bulletin 6. Santiago, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9333en. Consulto diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

FAO, FIDA, OMS, PMA y UNICEF. 2020. Versión resumida de El estado de la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición en el mundo 2020. Transformación de los sistemas alimentarios para que promuevan dietas asequibles y saludables. Roma, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9699es. Consultado febrero 2021. [ Links ]

Francis D. 2020. Agriculture, climate change and COVID-19. IICABlog. https://blog.iica.int/en/blog/agriculture-climate-change-and-covid-19. Consultado octubre 2020. [ Links ]

Goicochea N and Antolín MC. 2017. Increased nutritional value in food crops. Microbial biotechnology. 10:1004-1007. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12764 [ Links ]

Griebler C, and Abramov M. 2015. Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshwater Science. 34:355-367. https://doi.org/10.1086/679903. [ Links ]

Haleem A, and Javaid M. 2020. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic in daily life. Current Medicine Research and Practice 10:78-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmrp.2020.03.011 [ Links ]

Hassani MA, Durán P, and Hacquard S. 2018. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome. 6:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0 [ Links ]

Hossain I, Aktaruzzaman MM, Khan MH, and Mullick AR. 2020. A converse association: how biodiversity and wildlife connected with COVID-19. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 7 (10): 209-214. https://www.ejpmr.com/home/abstract_id/7326. Consultado enero 2021. [ Links ]

Heller NE, and Zavaleta ES. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 [ Links ]

Henry R. 2020. Innovations in agriculture and food supply in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Molecular Plant 13:1095-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.07.011. [ Links ]

Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, amd Walker P. 2002. How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 110 (5):445-456. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110445 [ Links ]

Infusino F, Marazzato M, Mancone M, Fedele F, Mastroiannni CM, Severino P, Ceccarielli G, Sntinelli L, Cavarretta E, Marullo AGM, Miraldi F, Carnevale R, Nocella C, Biondi-Zoccai G, Pagnini C, Schiavon S, Pugliese F, Frati G, and d’Ettorre G. 2020. Diet supplementation, probiotics, and nutraceuticals in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A scoping review. Nutrients 12:1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061718 [ Links ]

Khan N, Naseem Siddiqui B, Khan N, Ullah N, Wali A, Uddin Khan I, Ismail S and Ihtisham M. 2020. Drastic impacts of COVID-19 on food, agriculture and economy. Pure and Applied Biology 10 (1):62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2021.100008 [ Links ]

Khoury C, Laliberte´ B, and Guarino L. (2010) Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: a review of global crop and regional conservation strategies. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57 (4): 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9534-z [ Links ]

Lata RK, Divjot K, and Nath YA. 2019. Endophytic microbiomes: biodiversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Research Journal of Biotechnology 14:143-162. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Paper-%3A-Endophytic-Microbiomes-%3A-Biodiversity-%2C-and-Lata-Divjot/b3845600266b2d2fad531f7e0a66d2da86f9d957Links ]

Legrand F, Picot A, Cobo-Díaz JF, Carof M, Chen W, and Le Floch G. 2018. Effect of tillage and static abiotic soil properties on microbial diversity. Applied Soil Ecology 132:135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.016 [ Links ]

Marsden T and Smith E. 2005. Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding. Geoforum. 36(4):440-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.008. [ Links ]

Marlow S. 2020. COVID-19: Effects on the Fertilizer Industry. IHS Market 24(3): 2-6. https://ihsmarkit.com/research-analysis/report-covid19-effects-on-the-fertilizer-industry.html. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

Martínez-Blanco J, Lazcano C, Christensen TH, Muñoz P, Rieradevall J, Møller J, Antón A, and Boldrin A. 2013. Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33 (4):721-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0148-7 [ Links ]

Matveeva, T., Provorov, N., and Valkonen, J. (2018). Editorial: Cooperative adaptation and evolution in plant-microbiome system. Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (1090). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01090 [ Links ]

McDonald B. 2004. Population genetics of plant pathogens. Zurich, Switzerland: Institute of Plant Science/Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2004-0524-01 [ Links ]

Mercado-Mercado G, Blancas-Benítez F, Zamora-Gasga VM, and Sáyago-Ayerdi SG. 2020. Mexican traditional plant-foods: polyphenols bioavailability, gut microbiota metabolism and impact in human health. Current Pharmaceutical Design 25:3434-3456. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666191011093753 [ Links ]

Mishra PK, Joshi S, Gangola S, Khati P, Bisht JK, and Pattanayak A. 2020. Psychrotolerant Microbes: Characterization, conservation, strain improvements, mass production, and commercialization. 227-246 p. In Goel R., Soni R. and Suyal DC (eds). Microbiological Advancements for Higher Altitude Agro-Ecosystems & Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1902-4_1 [ Links ]

Neupane D. 2020. How conservation will be impacted in the COVID-19 pandemic. Wildlife Biology 2020. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00727 [ Links ]

Olesen SW, and Alm EJ. 2016. Dysbiosis is not an answer. Nature Microbiology 1:16228. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.228 [ Links ]

Park W. 2018. Gut microbiomes and their metabolites shape human and animal health. Journal of Microbiology 56:151-153. https://doi.org/0.1007/s12275-018-0577-8 [ Links ]

Patle GT, Kharpude SN, Dabral PP, and Kumar V. 2020. Impact of organic farming on sustainable agriculture system and marketing potential: A review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 10 (11): 100-120. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2020/v10i1130270 [ Links ]

Pilling D, Bélanger J, Diulgheroff S, Koskela J, Leroy G, Mair G, and Hoffmann I. 2020. Global status of genetic resources for food and agriculture: challenges and research needs. Genetic Resources 1 (1):4-16. https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.4-16 [ Links ]

Power AG. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Phylosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 365:2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 [ Links ]

Robles-Montoya RI, Chaparro-Encinas LA, Parra-Cota FI, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2020. Improving biometric traits of wheat seedlings with the inoculation of a consortium native of Bacillus. Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas 11(1): 229-235. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i1.2162 [ Links ]

Rojas-Padilla J, Chaparro-Encinas LA, Robles-Montoya RI, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2020. Growth promotion on wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) by coinoculation of native Bacillus strains isolated from the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Nova Scientia 12 (1): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v12i24.2136. [ Links ]

Sahu N, Vasu D, Sahu A, Lal N, and Singh SK. 2017. Strength of microbiomes in nutrient cycling: a key to soil health. 69-86 p. In Meena et al. (eds) Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5589-8_4 [ Links ]

Saleem M, Hu J, and Jousset A. 2019. More than the sum of its parts: microbiome biodiversity as driver of plant growth and soil health. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 50:145-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062605 [ Links ]

Sandoval-Cancino G, Zelaya-Molina LX, Ruíz-Ramírez S, Cruz-Cárdenas CI, Aragón-Magadán MA, Rojas-Anaya E, Chávez-Díaz IF. 2022. Agricultural genetic resources as a source of resilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 25(2022):006. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/3841. Consultado octubre 2021. [ Links ]

Sharma SK, Singh SK, Ramesh A, Sharma PK, Varma A, Ahmad E, Khande R, Singh UB, and Saxena AK. 2018. Microbial genetic resources: status, conservation, and access and benefit-sharing regulations.1-33 p. In Sharma SK and Varma A (eds). Microbial Resource Conservation. Soil Biology, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96971-8_1 [ Links ]

Singh A, Kumari R, Yadav AN, Mishra S, Sachan A, and Sachan SG. 2020. Chapter 1: Tiny microbes, big yields: Microorganisms for enhancing food crop production for sustainable development. 1-15 p. In Rastegari et al. (eds). New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00001-4. [ Links ]

Singh BK, and Trivedi P. 2017. Microbiome and the future for food and nutrient security. Microbial Biotechnology 10 (1):50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12592 [ Links ]

Soltanighias T, Vaid RK, and Rahi P. 2018. Agricultural microbial genetic resources: application and preservation at microbial resource centers. 141-173 p. In Sharma SK and Varma A. (eds). Microbial Resource Conservation. Soil Biology, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96971-8_ [ Links ]

Song SJ, Woodhams DC, Martino C, Allaband C, Mu A, Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery S, Suchodolski JS, and Knight R. 2019. Engineering the microbiome for animal health and conservation. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 244 (6):494-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370219830075. [ Links ]

Stanisavljevic N, Bajic SS, Jovanovic Z, Matic I, Tolinacki M, Popovic D, Popovic N, Terzic-Vidojevic A, Golic N, Beskoski V, and Samardzic J. 2020. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of allium ursinum and their associated microbiota during simulated in vitro digestion in the presence of food matrix. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:601616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.601616 [ Links ]

Subedi R, Karki M, and Panday D. 2020. Food system and water-energy-biodiversity nexus in Nepal: A review. Agronomy 10 (8):1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081129 [ Links ]

Sung B, and Hwang K. 2017. Promoting the utilization of plant, animal and microbial genetic resources for research and development in biotechnology: evidence on researchers’ preferences for specific attributes from Korean genebanks. Plant Genetic Resources 15 (3):195-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262115000520 [ Links ]

Thanner S, and Drissner D, Walsh F. 2016. Antimicrobial resistance in agriculture. MBio 7:e02227-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02227-15 [ Links ]

Thrall P, Oakeshott J, Fitt G, Southerton S, Burdon J, Sheppard A, Russell RJ, Zalucki M, Heino M, and Ford-Deison R. 2011. Evolution in agriculture: the applicaation of evolutionary approaches to the management of biotic interactions in agroecosystems. Evolutionary Applications 4:200-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00179.x [ Links ]

Thomashow LS, LeTourneau MK, Kwak YS, and Weller DM. 2019. The soil-borne legacy in the age of the holobion. Microbial Biotechnology 12:51-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13325 [ Links ]

Tooker J, O’Neal M, and Rodríguez-Saona C. 2020. Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosistems to improve biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 65 (2020):81-100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025143 [ Links ]

Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, and Gordon JI. 2007. The human microbiome project. Nature 449:804-810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06244 [ Links ]

Trivedi P, Leach JE Tringe SG, Sa T, and Singh BK. 2020. Plant-microbiome interactions: form community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:607-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 [ Links ]

Siche R. 2020. What is the impact of COVID-19 disease on agriculture? Scientia Agropecuaria. 11 (1):3-6. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.01.00 [ Links ]

Simon JC, Marchesi JR, Mougel C, and Selosse MA. 2019. Host-microbiota interactions: from holobiont theory to analysis. Microbiome. 7:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0619-4 [ Links ]

Usher K, Durkin J, and Bhullar N. 2020. The COVID‐19 pandemic and mental health impacts. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 29 (3): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12726 [ Links ]

Valenzuela-Aragón B, Parra-Cota FI, Santoyo G, Arellano-Wattenbarger GL, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2019. Plant-assisted selection: a promising alternative for in vivo identification of wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) growth promoting bacteria. Plant and Soil 435: 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-03901-1 [ Links ]

Valenzuela-Ruiz V, Ayala-Zepeda M, Arellano-Wattenbarger GL, Parra-Cota FI, García-Pereyra J, Aviña-Martínez GN, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2018. Microbial culture collections and their potential contribution to current and future food security. Revista Latinoamericana de Recursos Naturales 14 (1):18-25. https://www.itson.mx/publicaciones/rlrn/Documents/v14-n1-3.pdf. Consultado diciembre 2020. [ Links ]

Villarreal-Delgado MF, Villa-Rodríguez ED, Cira-Chávez LA, Estrada-Alvarado MI, Parra-Cota FI, and de los Santos-Villalobos S. 2017. The genus Bacillus as a biological control agent and its implications in the agricultural biosecurity. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 36 (1):95-130. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1706-5 [ Links ]

Wagg C, Bender F, Widmer F, and van der Heijden MGA. 2014. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:5266-5270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320054111 [ Links ]

Wall DH, Nielsen UN, and Six J. 2015. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature 528:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15744 [ Links ]

Wei Z, Gu Y, Friman VP, Kowalchuk GA, Xu Y, Shen Q, and Jousset A. 2019. Initial soil microbiome composition and functioning predetermine future plant health. Science Advances 5:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw0759 [ Links ]

Whipps J, Lewis K, and Cooke R. 2001. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. 161-187 p. In Burge M (ed)r. Fungi Biol Control Syst. Manchester University Press. [ Links ]

Zhan J. 2016. Population genetics of plant pathogens. In B. McDonald (ed.). eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021269.pub2 [ Links ]

Zhang J, van der Heijden MGA, Zhang F, and Bender F. 2020. Soil biodiversity and crop diversification are vital components of healthy soils and agricultural sustainability. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering 7:236-242. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020336 [ Links ]

Received: February 02, 2021; Accepted: March 30, 2021

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License