SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2Antracnosis (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.) del fruto de litchi (Litchi chinensis Soon.)en Oaxaca, MéxicoDistribución y Frecuencia de Organismos Asociados a la Enfermedad "Pata Prieta" de la Jamaica (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) en Guerrero, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8080versión impresa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.33 no.2 Texcoco  2015

 

Scientific articles

Effect of acibenzolar S-methyl on serrano pepper plants ( Capsicum annuum ) infected with Phytophthora capsici at different ages

Yesenia Cosme-Velázquez 1  

Remigio Anastacio Guzmán-Plazola 1   *  

Sergio Sandoval-Islas 1  

Tarcisio Corona-Torres 2  

Doricela Mendoza-Pérez 1  

1Programa de Fitopatología, Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo, km 36.5 Carretera México Texcoco, Estado de México, C.P. 56230. México.

2Programa de Genética, Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo, km 36.5 Carretera México Texcoco, Estado de México, C.P. 56230, México.


ABSTRACT

Pepper wilt caused by Phytophthora capsici causes considerable yield losses. Multiple alternatives have been tested to control this disease. Systemic resistance and age related resistance are low impact alternatives that could contribute to the control of this plant health problem. In this work, transplanting age, with or without acibenzolar S-methyl (ASM), was tested as a possible strategy to reduce the effects of the disease in serrano pepper plants. One milligram of ASM/plant was sprayed weekly, starting a week before transplanting, to seedlings of age 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. These treatments were tested in two Serrano cultivars (Camino Real and a creole from Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla) with or without inoculation with any of two P. capsici strains. The ASM reduced de area under the disease progress curve but did not inhibit pathogen infection. ASM also reduced the growth level of plants from the three tested ages. Seedlings transplanted 45 days after seeding resulted more susceptible to the disease than younger ones.

Additional keywords: nurseries; plant age; systemic resistance

RESUMEN

La marchitez del chile causada por Phytophthora capsici, provoca pérdidas considerables de rendimiento, por lo que se han probado múltiples alternativas de manejo de la enfermedad. La inducción de resistencia sistémica y la resistencia asociada con la edad son alternativas de bajo impacto ambiental que podrían coadyuvar al control de este problema sanitario. En el presente trabajo se investigó si la edad al momento del trasplante, con y sin aplicación de acibenzolar S-metil (ASM), puede ser una estrategia para reducir el efecto de la enfermedad en plantas de chile serrano (Capsicum annuum L.). Se probaron dosis de 1 mg de ASM/planta aplicadas semanalmente desde una semana antes del trasplante a plántulas (trasplantadas a 45, 30 y 15 días después de la siembra) de dos genotipos de chile (Camino Real y criollo de Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla) con o sin inoculación con dos cepas de P. capsici. El ASM redujo el área bajo la curva del progreso de la enfermedad pero no inhibió la infección por el patógeno. El ASM también redujo el desarrollo de las plantas en las tres edades evaluadas. Plántulas trasplantadas a 45 días después de la siembra resultaron más susceptibles a la enfermedad que las de edades más jóvenes.

Palabras clave adicionales: viveros; edad de la planta; resistencia sistémica

Wilt caused by Phytophthora capsici Leonian is a devastating disease of pepper crops (Capsicum annum L.) that is found present in all producing zones in the world (Moran et al., 2010). This pathogen can cause yield losses of up to 100 % (Rico-Guerrero et al., 2004). Once it is detected in the field, it might be necessary to implement a combination of strategies to handle the disease, including crop rotation, fumigation, subsoling, raising seedbeds, irrigating from well water, genetic resistance, application of fungicides, destruction of infected plants and early harvest (Granke et al., 2012).

Currently, there is a high demand of environmentally acceptable alternatives for crop protection. Among these, the induction of systemic resistance is an alternative whose processes involve the activation of natural defense mechanisms of the plants through elicitors generated by the pathogens themselves, by other organisms, or by environmental factors (Carvajal, 2013). The application of synthetic chemical products can also activate physiological and biochemical processes in the plant and avoid or reduce the progress of diseases (Guevara and Rodriguez-Galvez, 2006). Among these compounds outstands acibenzolar S-methyl (ASM), an inducer of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) which has been studied for plant disease control in the last few years (Buzi et al., 2004). ASM acts as a functional analog of salicylic acid in the SAR signaling pathway and influences the expression of genes and the activity of several enzymes related with resistance as well as the production of lignin and phenol compounds (Malolepsza, 2006). Wilt reduction has been reported with the use of ASM against P. capsici in bell pepper (Matheron and Porchas, 2002), against P. cactorum and P. fragariae var fragariae in strawberries (Eikemo et al., 2003), and against P. capsici in squash (Kone et al., 2009). Similarly, the pre-treatment of Curcuma longa seedlings induces SAR against Pythium aphanidermatum (Radhakrishnan et al., 2011). However, the effect of ASM against P. capsici in other pepper varieties has not been well documented.

Plants can modify their level of resistance to diseases as the age of the plant or the maturity of the tissues advances (Develey-Riviere and Galiana, 2007). These changes in resistance are every time more recognized as an important component of plant defense against infection (Whallen, 2005) and may have important implications in the definition of adequate control strategies. The severity of the damage by P. capsici may vary with the age of the seedlings (Kim et al., 1989). In cucurbitaceae, older fruits showed a gradual reduction in susceptibility to P. capsici with respect to younger fruits (Ando et al., 2009). Similarly, pepper (C. annuumL.) fruits are less infected as they advance in their maturation process (Biles et al., 1993).

The joint management of resistance inducers and variation in the age of the seedlings when transplanting are two more elements in managing pepper wilt by P. capsici that could contribute to decrease the amount of fungicides used in the production of this crop. In the present work, we evaluated whether the regular application of ASM to plants of different ages at transplanting can be used as a strategy to decrease wilt severity in two cultivars of Serrano pepper.

Materials and Methods

Establishment of the experiments. Every 15 d, pepper (C. annuum) seeds of the Camino Real (Harris Moran) hybrid and a creole cultivar from Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla state, Mexico, were planted in 125 ml polyurethane cups with sterilized peat moss (PREMIER) and perlite (AGROLITA) at a 3:1 proportion. The seedlings were transplanted at 45, 30, and 15 d age into polyurethane pots with 1 L soil from the pepper producing region in Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo, Mexico (VMH), where pepper wilt is a serious problem. To define treatments, a factorial arrangement of the following factors was constructed: 1) cultivar (Camino Real and creole from Tetela de Ocampo), 2) seedling age (transplanted at 45, 30, and 15 d after seeding), 3) resistance inducer (with or without ASM), and 4) P. capsici inoculation (Strain 1, Strain 2, and a control without inoculation). A total of 36 combinations (2 x 3 x 2 x 3) were evaluated. The experiment was established under greenhouse conditions, under a completely random design with ten replicates, and it was done twice.

In the corresponding treatments, the leaves were sprayed weekly with 1 mg ASM/plant to the seedlings of all three ages, beginning one week before transplanting and until the end of the experiment (51 d after transplanting). Actigard(r) 50 (Syngenta) was used as a source of ASM. The inoculation of P. capsici was done 45 d after transplantation. The strains used were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH and they were previously tested as pathogenic in the abovementioned cultivars. Before inoculation, all the plants were irrigated with distilled water. Each seedling was inoculated with 1 mL of a suspension with 105 zoospores/mL. The suspension was injected into the base of the stem at a depth of 2 cm. After inoculation, all plants were irrigated until the soil in each pot was saturated. The controls without inoculation were treated with sterile distilled water. Daily temperature conditions in the greenhouse varied from 12 to 35 °C.

Evaluated variables. After transplanting, wilt severity, plant height, and the number of leaves per plant were evaluated every third day. At the end of the experiment, the dry weight of the aerial part was evaluated. The severity was evaluated based on the scale of Moran et al. (2010). From these results, the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated by means of the trapezoidal integration method (Shaner and Finney, 1977). To estimate the dry weight of the plants, the plant material was placed in perforated paper bags and dried in a forced air oven at 70 °C for 72 h. At the end of the experiment, root segments were collected and incubated at room temperature (24 °C) in PARPH medium (Kannwischer and Mitchell, 1978). Also, root subsamples were placed in Petri dishes with sterile distilled water to verify the occurrence of coenocytic mycelia with sporangia typical of P. capsici.

Data analysis. The data obtained were analyzed statistically by the variance analysis technique and the Tukey multiple range test (Steel and Torrie, 1980). The information was processed with the SAS (Statistical Analysis System, v. 9.3 Cary, North Carolina) statistical software.

Results

Table 1 shows a summary of the results of the variance analysis for the main variables evaluated in the present work. Figures 1 to 7 report the results for the highest order significant interactions.

Table 1 Summary of the variance analysis (P > F) of the variables evaluated in Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). 

1Trasplante a 45, 30 y 15 días después de la siembra.

2cv Camino Real (Harris Moran), cv criollo de Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla.

3Con acibenzolar S-metil, sin Inductor de resistencia.

4Testigo no Inoculado, Cepa1 y Cepa 2 de Phytophthora capsici.

** Interacción utilizada para la comparación de medias y preparación de gráficas.

Figure 1 Experiment 1. Effect of the Plant age X Genotype X Resistance inducer X Phytophthora capsici inoculation interaction on the area under the disease progress curve of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). The oomycete strains were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH. The inoculation was done with 105 zoospores per plant 45 days after transplanting. Means from ten replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. CR = Camino Real (Harris Moran) cv. TO = Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, creole cv. TNI = control without P. capsici inoculation, unsterilized soil. 

Figure 2 Experiment 2. Effect of the Plant age X Genotype X Phytophthora capsici inoculation interaction on the area under the disease progress curve of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). The oomycete strains were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH. The inoculation was done with 105 zoospores per plant 45 days after transplantation. Means from 20 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. CR = Camino Real (Harris Moran) cv. TO = Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, creole cv. TNI = control without P. capsici inoculation, unsterilized soil. 

Figure 3 Experiment 2. Effect of the Plant age X Resistance inducer X Phytophthora capsici inoculation interaction on the area under the disease progress curve of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). The oomycete strains were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH. The inoculation was done with 105 zoospores per plant 45 days after transplantation. Means from 20 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. Cl=with acibenzolar S-methyl. Sl = with no resistance inducer. TNI = control without P. capsici inoculation, unsterilized soil. 

Figure 4 Experiment 1. Effect of the Plant age X Genotype X Resistance inducer interaction on the dry weight of the aerial part of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). Means from 30 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. CR = Camino Real (Harris Moran) cv. TO = Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, creole cv. Cl = with acibenzolar S-methyl. Sl = without resistance inducer. 

Figure 5 Experiment 1. Effect of the Plant age X Genotype X Phytophthora capsici inoculation interaction on the dry weight of the aerial part of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). The oomycete strains were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH. The inoculation was done with 105 zoospores per plant 45 days after transplantation. Means from 20 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. CR = Camino Real (Harris Moran) cv. TO = Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, creole cv. TNI = control without P. capsici inoculation, unsterilized soil. 

Figure 6 Experiment 1. Effect of the Resistance inducer X Phytophthora capsici inoculation interaction on the dry weight of the aerial part of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). The oomycete strains were isolated from Serrano pepper plants from the VMH. The inoculation was done with 105 zoospores per plant 45 days after transplantation. Means from 60 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). TNI = control without P. capsici inoculation, unsterilized soil. Cl = with acibenzolar S-methyl. Sl = without resistance inducer. 

Figure 7 Experiment 2. Effect of the Plant age X Genotype X Resistance inducer interaction on the dry weight of the aerial part of Serrano pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated in unsterilized soil from the Vega de Metztitlán, Hidalgo (VMH). Means from 30 replicates. Means with the same letter are statistically equal (Tukey α = 0.5). Age 1, 2, and 3 = transplant at 45, 30, and 15 days after seeding. CR = Camino Real (Harris Moran) cv. TO = Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla, creole cv. Cl = with acibenzolar S-methyl. Sl = without resistance inducer. 

Area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). In experiment 1, the variance analysis indicated highly significant effects of the age X cultivar X resistance inducer X inoculation interaction (P<0.0004). This result indicates that, in general, the plants of age 1 (transplanted 45 d after seeding) had a greater AUDPC than those of ages 2 and 3 (transplanted 30 and 15 d) (Figure 1). At age 1, the inoculation with P. capsici had a greater AUDPC than the controls with ASM and no inoculation, particularly when the plants were infected with Strain 1 (Figure 1). When ASM was not applied, the differences between treatments with or without inoculation were only significant in the Camino Real cultivar when it was inoculated with Strain 1. With the exception of this treatment, the response pattern among cultivars at this age was similar. In ages 2 and 3, although AUDPC was greater in the inoculated treatments, the difference with respect to the control were only significant in the plants of the Tetela de Ocampo cultivar inoculated with Strain 1, without ASM.

The application of ASM decreased the AUDPC, but not in all cases. At age 1, the Camino Real plants inoculated with Strain 1 of P. capsici and the control plants with no inoculation treated with ASM had a lower AUDPC than those not treated with the inducer. However, plants inoculated with Strain 2 showed no decrease in the AUDPC by effect of ASM, and the value of this variable resulted significantly higher than the control without inoculation but with ASM. Plants at ages 2 and 3, with and without ASM, had statistically equal AUDPC.

In experiment 2, the variance analysis indicated highly significant effects of the age X genotype X inoculation (P<0.0001) and age X resistance inducer X inoculation (P<0.0015) interactions. In the first interaction, no significant differences were detected in AUDPC among the different ages, except when the plants of age 1 were inoculated with Strain 1 (Figure 2), where there was a greater AUDPC. The rest of the differences were mainly due to the inoculation with P. capsici, regardless of the strain, which caused greater AUDPC than in the controls (Figures 2 and 3 ), with the exception of Camino Real cv. plants of age 1 without inoculation, which resulted statistically equal.

When analyzing the age X resistance inducer X inoculation interaction (Figure 3), it can be seen that there was no significant decrease in AUDPC with the application of ASM, regardless of the age. Moreover, against expectations, plants of age 1 inoculated with Strain 1 and treated with ASM had a greater AUDPC than the control without inoculation and treated with ASM.

Formation of mycelia and sporangia of P. capsici from pepper roots. At the end of the experiments, there was mycelium growth in PARPH medium from plants of all ages inoculated with both strains of P. capsici, but the greatest number of segments where there was mycelial growth occurred in plants inoculated 45 d after seeding (age 1). The frequency of cases in ages 2 and 3 was considerably lower. ASM tended to decrease the number of cases with mycelium growth in age 1 but did not inhibit infection (data not shown). The formation of sporangia in water from root segments of pepper inoculated with P. capsici only occurred in age 1 plants in both experiments. These reproductive structures were not detected in plants from age 2 and 3 in any treatment.

Dry weight of the aerial part, number of leaves, and plant height. In experiment 1, the variance analysis indicated significant effects on the dry weight of the aerial part (DWAP) in the age X genotype X resistance inducer (P=0.0137), age X genotype X inoculum (P=0.023), and resistance inducer X inoculum (P=0.0344) interactions. The first interaction indicates that ASM decreased DWAP in all ages and cultivars, but only in the Camino Real cv., ages 1 and 2, and the Tetela de Ocampo cv., age 3, the differences between plants with and without ASM treatment were significant (Figure 4).

In the case of the age X genotype X inoculation interaction, the results indicate that the DWAP of the Camino Real cv., age 2, with or without P. capsici inoculation, was higher than any other treatment at ages 1 and 3 (Figure 5). In the Tetela de Ocampo cv. age 2, the results were statistically equal to those of the Camino Real. In plants inoculated with Strain 1, which showed a decrease in DWAP, the differences against the rest of the treatments were not significant according to the Tukey test, regardless of the high number of replications involved and the fact that there were relatively drastic weight decreases. It is worth mentioning that in most cases, the DWAP of the controls in all ages and cultivars was numerically higher than in the plants inoculated with the pathogen.

The results of the resistance inducer X inoculation interaction indicate that the plants with ASM had lower DWAP values than those with no ASM and that the highest value corresponded to the control without inoculation and without ASM (Figure 6). The differences within the group of plants without ASM were not significant. The non-inoculated control with no ASM had a significantly greater DWAP than the plants with ASM, with or without P. capsici inoculation. Also, the DWAP of the plants with no ASM, inoculated with Strain 1 of P. capsici was greater than that of the inoculated plants treated with ASM.

In experiment 2, the variance analysis only showed significant effect of the age X genotype X resistance inducer interaction (P = 0.0069) on the dry weight of the aerial part (DWAP). This result indicates that the application of ASM caused a significant decrease in the DWAP of plants of all genotypes and ages, with the exception of the Camino Real cv., age 1 (Figure 7). The DWAP of the Camino Real cv., age 2, without ASM had the highest value, but it was statistically equal to the plants of the same cultivar, age 1, with and without ASM and to the Tetela de Ocampo cultivar, age 2, without ASM. The DWAP of plants age 3, with ASM was significantly lower in the plants treated with this resistance inducer, regardless of the cultivar.

The results of the variance analysis of the number of leaves and the area under the plant height progress curve of showed similar trends than those described for the DWAP. There was a significant decrease in the value of these variables due to ASM application and a tendency to greater development in plants of age 2, with negative effects of P. capsici inoculation with respect to the controls with no inoculation (data not shown).

Discussion

In the present work, ASM caused a decrease of the AUDPC of pepper wilt, although the effect was not consistent against both of the evaluated strains. The plant age factor determined important changes in the expression of the disease.

ASM tended to be more effective in decreasing the severity of pepper wilt in plants of ages 2 and 3, but it did not completely inhibit symptoms expression. This result agrees with other researchers who have reported a decrease in the disease with the application of ASM against P. capsici in bell pepper (Matheron and Porchas, 2002) and in squash (Kone et al., 2009). In this work, ASM was applied weekly starting one week before inoculation, but it caused a decrease in dry weight, number of leaves, and plant height in plants of all ages. Ramos (2013) also observed a decrease in plant development and growth in uchuva (Physallis peruviana) plants using ASM concentrations greater than 10 mg/L. Mejía et al. (2009) also observed similar results on tree tomato (Solanum betaceum) with doses of 25 mg/L. Also, Nair et al. (2007) reported that doses of 25 mg/L delayed growth in amaranth plants (Amaranthus spp.). The activation of systemic acquired resistance through the use of ASM can lead to an additional energetic cost, thus producing smaller and lighter plants and fruits (Van Wees et al., 2000; Romero et al., 2001). However, the effect of applying inducers may depend on the time of activation of the signals, the fungal strain, the inducer used, and its persistence on the plants (Perazzolli et al., 2008). It is then necessary to carry out further essays to optimize the time and application dose of ASM. On the other hand, there are reports about that the combination of induced systemic resistance (ISR) inducers with microorganisms that propitiate SAR results in a greater coordination between the implicated metabolic pathways (Abo-Elyousr et al., 2009); although there are reports about that the activation of one pathway inhibits the other. This type of combinations has not been evaluated in pepper, making it recommendable to test the joint action of ISR and SAR inducers, as well as the subsequent application of fungicides.

Factors associated with the biochemical and physiological changes at different seedling ages could determine variations in the susceptibility to the disease (Kim et al., 1989; Gevens et al., 2006; Juvany et al., 2013). For practical purposes, the use of 30 d old plants with an optimized dose of ASM could help to decrease the damage from P. capsici. This may be particularly true if natural infection levels are as low as the ones seen in the soil used in this work which were considerably lower than those obtained with the inoculation of a high number of zoospores per plant. It is necessary, however, to evaluate this behavior under field conditions, since environmental and management factors under those conditions are not easily reproduced in the greenhouse.

Conclusions

The application of ASM decreased the AUDPC of Serrano pepper blight but it also caused, in most cases, a decrease in the accumulation of dry matter in the aerial part of the plants of the Camino Real (Harris Moran) and the creole from Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla cultivars.

Thirty day old pepper plants had greater tolerance to wilt and greater development than did 45 d and 15 d old plants, regardless of inoculation of P. capsici, 45 d after transplanting.

Acknowledgements

To the Colegio de Postgraduados for the economic funding granted to carry out this research.

REFERENCES

Abo-Elyousr KA, Hashemb M and Alib EH. 2009. Integrated control of cotton root rot disease by mixing fungal biocontrol agents and resistance inducers. Crop Protection 28:295-301. [ Links ]

Ando K, Hammar S, and Grumet R. 2009. Age-related resistance of diverse cucurbit fruit to infection by Phytophthora capsici. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 134:176-182. [ Links ]

Biles C, Wall M, Waugh M and Palmer H. 1993. Relationship of Phytophthora fruit rot to fruit maturation and cuticle thickness of New Mexican-type peppers. Phytopathology 83:607-611. [ Links ]

Buzi A, Chilosi G, De Sillo D and Magro P. 2004. Induction of resistance in melon to Dydimella bryoniae and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by seed treatments with acibenzolar- S-methyl and methyl jasmonate but not with salicylic acid. Journal Phytopathology 152: 34-42. [ Links ]

Carvajal ACE. 2013. Respuestas de defensa inducidas por acibenzolar-s-metil (ASM) en plantas de uchuva (Physalis peruviana). Tesis de Maestria. Bogotá, Colombia. 84p. [ Links ]

Develey-Riviere MP y Galiana E. 2007. Resistance to pathogens and host developmental stage: A multifaceted relationship within the plant kingdom. New Phytologist 175:405-416. [ Links ]

Eikemo H, Stensvand A and Tronsmo AM. 2003. Induced resistance as a possible means to control diseases of strawberry caused by Phytophthora spp. Plant Disease 87:345-350. [ Links ]

Gevens AJ, Ando K, Lamour K, Grumet R and Hausbeck MK. 2006. Development of a detached cucumber fruit assay to screen for resistance and effect of fruit age on susceptibility to infection by Phytophthora capsici. Plant Disease 90:1276-1282. [ Links ]

Granke LL, Quesada-Ocampo L and Hausbeck MK. 2012. Advances in Research on Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops in The United States. Plant Disease 95:1588-1600. [ Links ]

Guevara I y Rodríguez-Gálvez E. 2006. Inductores químicos de resistencia en la supresión de la marchites del algodonero causada por Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum en sistema hidropónico. Universalia 11: 2-8. [ Links ]

Juvany M, Müller M and Munné-Bosch S. 2013. Plant age-related changes in cytokinins, leaf growth and pigment accumulation in juvenile mastic trees. Environmental and Experimental Botany 87:10-18. [ Links ]

Kannwischer ME and Mitchell DJ. 1978. The influence of a fungicide on the epidemiology of black shank of tobacco. Phytopathology 68: 1760-1765. [ Links ]

Kim YJ, Hwang BK and Park KW. 1989. Expression of age related resistance in pepper plants infected with Phytophthora capsici. Plant Disease 73:745-747. [ Links ]

Koné D, Csinos AS, Jackson KL and Ji P. 2009. Evaluation of systemic acquired resistance inducers for control of Phytophthora capsici on squash. Crop Protection 28:533-538. [ Links ]

Malolepsza U. 2006. Induction of disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and O-hydroxyethylorutin against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Crop Protection 25:956-962. [ Links ]

Matheron ME and Porchas M. 2002. Suppression of Phytophthora root and crown rot on pepper plant treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl. Plant Disease 86: 292-297. [ Links ]

Mejía D, Rodas E, Patiño L y González J. 2009. Efecto del acibenzolar-S-metil sobre el desarrollo de virosis causada por potyvirus en tomate de árbol. Agronomía Colombiana 27:87-93. [ Links ]

Morán-Bañuelos SH, Aguilar-Rincón VH, Corona-Torres T and Zavaleta-Mejía E. 2010. Resistencia a Phytophthora capsici Leo. de chiles nativos del sur de Puebla. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 33: 21-26. [ Links ]

Nair CB, Anith KN and Sreekumar J. 2007. Mitigation of growth retardation effect of plant defense activator, acibenzolar-S-methyl, in Amaranthus plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 23: 1183-1187. [ Links ]

Perazzolli M, Dagostin S, Ferrar A, Elad I and Pertot I. 2008. Induction of systemic resistance against Plasmopara viticola in grapevine by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and benzothiadiazole. Biological Control 47:228-234. [ Links ]

Radhakrishnan N, Alphonse AJ and Balasubramanian R. 2011. Effect of Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) pre-treatment in inducing resistance against Pythium aphanidermatum infection in Curcuma longa. Crop Protection 30:24-32. [ Links ]

Rico-Guerrero L, Medina-Ramos S, Muñoz-Sánchez CI, Guevara-Olvera L, Guevara- González RG, Guerrero-Aguilar BZ, Torres-Pacheco I, Rodríguez-Guerra R and González-Chavira MM. 2004. Detección de Phytophthora capsici Leonian en plantas de chile (Capsicum annuum L.) mediante PCR. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 22:1-6. [ Links ]

Romero AM, Kousik CS and Ritchie DF. 2001. Resistance to bacterial spot in bell pepper induced by acibenzolar-S-methyl. Plant Disease 85:189-194. [ Links ]

Ramos, IM. 2013. Inducción de genes de defensa por acibenzolar-s-metil y su efecto en el control del marchitamiento vascular causado por Fusarium oxysporum en Uchuva (Physalis peruviana). Tesis de Maestría 6-92p. [ Links ]

Shaner G and Finney RE. 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology 67:1051-1056. [ Links ]

Steel RGD and Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, Second Edition: McGraw-Hill. New York, USA. [ Links ]

Van Wees SCM, De Swart EAM, Van-Pelt JA, Van-Loon LC and Pieterse CMJ. 2000. Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate- and jasmonate dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceeding Natural Academic. Science 97: 8711-8716. [ Links ]

Whallen MC. 2005. Host defense in a developmental context. Molecular Plant Pathology 6:347-360. [ Links ]

Received: June 22, 2015; Accepted: July 01, 2015

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License