SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Asociación de un Potexvirus como Agente Causal de Manchas Cloróticas en Opuntia ficus-indicaEscala Diagramática de Severidad para el Complejo Mancha de Asfalto del Maíz índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versão On-line ISSN 2007-8080versão impressa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.33 no.1 Texcoco  2015

 

Phytopatological notes

Antibacterial activity of methanol:chloroform extracts of phytopathogenic fungi

María de la Soledad Lagunes-Castro 1  

Aracely López-Monteon 2  

Angel Ramos-Ligonio 3  

Ángel Trigos 4  

Alejandro Salinas 5  

César Espinoza 5   *  

1Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas; Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

2LADISER Inmunología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Orizaba, Veracruz, México.

3Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

4Laboratorio de Alta Tecnología de Xalapa, Universidad Veracruzana. Calle Médicos 5, Unidad del Bosque, Xalapa 91010, Veracruz, México y Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

5Laboratorio de Alta Tecnología de Xalapa, Universidad Veracruzana. Calle Médicos 5, Unidad del Bosque, Xalapa 91010, Veracruz, México.


ABSTRACT

Antibacterial activity of methanol: chloroform extracts from fifteen phytopathogenic fungi strains was evaluated against bacterial strains of Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolytic, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermis coagulase (+), Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The antibacterial activity was determined by the disk diffusion method, with 1.5x108 CFU/mL of bacterial concentration. After 24 h of incubation, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum musae extracts showed specific inhibition halos for Escherichia coli (70 µg/mL; 17.6 ± 0.20 and 15.6 ± 0.26 respectively, P<0.0001) and the extract of Idriella lunata showed inhibition on the growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolytic and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (70 µg/mL; 9.8 ± 0.15, 9.2 ± 0.15 and 10.2 ± 0.20 respectively, P<0.0001).

Key words: antimicrobials; extract phytopathogenic fungi

RESUMEN

Se evaluó la actividad antibacteriana de 15 extractos metanol:cloroformo de hongos fitopatógenos contra las cepas bacterianas Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolítico, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermis coagulasa (+), Escherichia coli y Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Dicha actividad se determinó por la técnica de difusión en disco, con una concentración de 1.5x108 UFC/mL. Después de 24 h de incubación, los extractos de Colletotrichum gloeosporioides y Colletotrichum musae mostraron halos de inhibición específicos para Escherichia coli (70 µg/mL; 17.6 ± 0.20 y 15.6 ± 0.26, respectivamente, P<0.0001) y el extracto de Idriella lunata mostró inhibición sobre el crecimiento de Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolítico y Pseudomonas aeruginosa (70 µg/mL; 9.8 ± 0.15, 9.2 ± 0.15 y 10.2 ± 0.20 respectivamente, P<0.0001).

Palabras clave: Antimicrobianos; extractos de hongos fitopatógenos

The ability of bacteria to develop antibacterial resistance has encouraged the research of new and more powerful antibiotics (Dax, 1997; Demain and Sánchez, 2009). The secondary fungal metabolites are an important source of bioactive compounds useful in agriculture and medicine, due to their large structural range (Nigam y Singh et al., 2000). Among fungi, those that have a close relation with other organisms are usually the ones that produce metabolites with increased bioactivity, since the high levels of environmental stress and the intense and frequent interactions with other organisms benefit a larger metabolic diversity (Dreyfuss and Chapela, 1994). Examples include phytopathogenic fungi that cause disease before, during, and after the harvest and storage of vegetables (García, 2004; Trigos et al., 2008), which constitute the group of the most important microorganisms from an economic point of view in regard to the frequency of their occurrence and damage that they may cause in different agricultural crops (Agrios, 2005).

In Mexico, research related to the biomedical potential of phytopathogenic fungi is virtually non-existent; therefore; previous research done by our work group has demonstrated the ability of certain phytopathogenic fungal species to inhibit the growth of bacterial and phytopathogenic strains of medical interest (Trigos et al., 2005 and 2006). Likewise, Espinoza et al., (2008) demonstrated that compounds and raw extracts of Idriella sp. presented antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria. It is worth mentioning that the Gliocladium, Geotrichum and Rhizopus genera, which are considered saprophytes and which were used in this study, are likewise associated as causal agents for the decay and death of the royal palm (Sepúlveda, 1998), the acid decay of lemon (Hernández-Montiel et al., 2011) and postharvest decay of tomatoes (Zhao et al., 2008), respectively. Furthermore, the Idriella genus has been reported as the cause of root rot in strawberry plantations, I. lunata being the causal agent of the aforementioned disease (Nelson and Stephen, 1956). As a result, the objective of this work was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of methanol:chloroform extracts from a culture of 15 phytopathogenic fungi compared to bacterial strains of clinical interest.

Materials and methods

Phytopathogenic fungi. The fungal strains used in this study (Table 1) were obtained from the culture collection of the Laboratory of High Technology in Xalapa (LATEX) and came from different cultures of economic interest in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Their identification has been supported through taxonomic keys (Romero-Cova, 1988; Mendoza-Zamora, 1996; Barnett and Hunter, 1998) and for the Colletotrichum genus, pathogenicity assessments were done (Márquez-Fernández et al., 2013). Likewise, a strain of I. lunata ATCC 12574 was used, due to the antibacterial activities reported in said species by Espinoza et al., (2008). The cultivation of each one of the fungi was done in Petri dishes with potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco), the incubation period varied for each species and oscillated between 7 and 12 days at 25 ± 2 °C until the mycelium covered 75 % of the surface of the culture medium.

Table 1 Phytopathogenic Fungi strains. 

The strains were isolated and morphologically identified through taxonomic keys (Romero-Cova, 1988; Mendoza-Zamora, 1996; Barnett y Hunter, 1998) and through pathogenicity tests for the Colletotrichum genus (Márquez-Fernández et al., 2013).

Bacterial strains. The bacterial strains used were: Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolytic (ATCC 25923), Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 6303), Staphylococcus epidermis coagulase (+) (ATCC 14990), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 17933) (American Type Culture Collection, 2010).

Fungal culture and extraction. For the liquid culture of the phytopathogenic fungi, circles of 1 cm in diameter were taken from each one of the fungal strains of a culture from 7 days of incubation, and were aseptically transferred to 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of potato broth with dextrose, where they incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 15 days shaking them continuously at 150 rpm. Once the incubation period was over, the biomass produced by each fungal strain was filtered by vacuum filtration. Subsequently, it was dehydrated through lyophilization and was extracted with a mixture of methanol:chloroform (1:1) during 3 days, the solvent excess was eliminated through distillation with reduced pressure (Trigos et al., 2011).

Antibacterial activity assessment of phytopathogenic fungi extracts against bacterial strains of clinical interest. The antibacterial activity was evaluated following the agar on a Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (Koneman et al., 2004). The treatments were done in Petri dishes with Luria-Bertani agar, these were inoculated with each of the bacterial strains under review, with a cellular suspension with a turbidity equal to that of the 0.5 tube on the McFarland scale, equal to 1.5 x 108 UFC/mL (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007). Conversely, the dry fungal extracts were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma Chemical Co.) to a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and from this solution serialized dilutions were done in order to obtain the different extract concentrations that were used in the test (20, 50 and 70 µg/mL). Subsequently, filter discs (6 mm in diameter) were placed on top of the Petri dishes, each of them permeated with 20 μL of each of the different extract concentrations of the phytopathogenic fungi. Permeated discs with DMSO served as a negative control and commercial discs with 25 μg of ampicillin were used as a positive control. Finally, the Petri dishes were incubated at 35 ± 2 ºC during 24 h. The inhibition zone diameters were measured in mm. The treatments were done with three repetitions for each concentration of each of the phytopathogenic fungi against each one of the bacterial strains assessed.

Statistical Analysis. The data obtained was analyzed with an ANOVA Dunnett, (P<0.0001) in order to detect differences between the inhibition zone diameters obtained by the extracts compared to the negative control.

Results and discussion

The statistical analysis of the obtained inhibition diameters showed that the Colletotrichum musae and C. gloeosporioides extracts had significant inhibition activity on the growth of Escherichia coli for the concentrations of 20, 50 and 70 µg/mL (P<0.0001), related to the negative control. Conversely, the significant differences in the inhibition diameters caused by the Idriella lunata extract on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus β-hemolytic, E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in concentrations of 50 and 70 µg/mL (P<0.0001) in relation to the negative control used (Table 2) were also registered. The results obtained show that the C. gloeosporioides and C. musae extracts are selective for E. coli. This could be useful in the treatment of domestic waste water primarily used in agriculture, especially in places where this resource is scarce (Pedrero et al., 2010). Furthermore, the Idriella lunata extract showed activity against both Gram (-) and Gram (+) bacteria.

Table 2 Bacterial inhibition zone diameters taken from fungal extracts. 

1Average of three repetitions ± the standard error of the measurement (SEM). *** indicate significant statistical differences regarding the negative control (Dunnett, p<0.0001). NA. Non-active.

When working with raw extracts and not with a pure chemical compound, the active concentrations are encouraging as they manifest a highly effective activity, that is also similar to previous results that have demonstrated the antimicrobial activity of other species of phytopathogenic fungi such as Menisporopsis theobromae and Idriella sp., against E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Erwinia carotovora, E. carotovora pv. atroseptica and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Trigos et al., 2005). Additionally, Curvularia lunata, Phytophthora drechsleri, Phytophthora capsici, Gliocladium spp, Neocosmospora vasinfecta resulted active against bacteria such as E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Trigos et al., 2006). Similarly, Espinoza et al. (2008), demonstrated that the 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde and 1-n-Butyl- β-D-fructopyranoside obtained from the Idriella sp culture showed antibacterial activities against the phytopathogenic bacteria Xanthomonas axonopodis, Pectobacte-rium carotovorum, P. chrysanthemi and Erwinia amylovora with a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of 0.625 mg/mL.

Conclusions

Even though phytopathogenic fungi remain as the main cause of the partial or total yield decrease of crops and thus represent high financial losses, the results obtained place the Colletotrichum musae, C. gloeosporioides and Idriella lunata strains, for their antibacterial activity, as potential sources of bioactive compounds against bacterial strains of medical interest that represent the cause of common infections in our country. As a result, this work presents the possibility of continued research on the utilization of phytopathogenic fungi for medical applications, previous chemical, pharmacological, toxicological and clinical studies.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the FOMIX CONACYT Veracruz State Government (VER-2009-C03-128039) project, and the SEP-CONACYT basic-2012 (181820) project. María de la Soledad Lagunes-Castro, thanks CONACyT for the doctoral fellowship (249756).

REFERENCES

Agrios GN. 2005. Plant Pathology. Fifth Edition. Academic Press. New York, USA. 922p. [ Links ]

ATCC. American Type Culture Collection. 2010. Cells and microorganisms, bacterial products. http://www.atcc.org/Products/Cells%20and%20Microorganisms/Bacteria.aspx (consulta, marzo 2014). [ Links ]

Barnett HL y Hunter BB. 1998. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. American Phytopathological Society Press. St. Paul, Minnesota. USA. 218p [ Links ]

Dax SL. 1997. Antibacterial Chemotherapeutic Agents. First edition. Blackie Academic &amp; Professional, Londres, UK. 396p. [ Links ]

Demain AL y Sánchez S. 2009. Microbial drug discovery: 80 years of progress. The Journal of Antibiotics 62: 5-16. [ Links ]

Dreyfuss MM y Chapela IH. 1994. Potential of fungi in the discovery of novel, low molecular weight pharmaceuticals. Pp: 49-80 Gullo, VP. (eds.). The Discovery of Natural Products with Therapeutic Potential. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, USA. 461p. [ Links ]

Espinoza C, Viniegra-González G, Loera O, Heredia G y Trigos Á. 2008. Antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens by cruded extracts and compounds from Idriella sp. Revista Mexicana de Micología 26: 9-15. [ Links ]

García CV. 2004. Introducción a la microbiología. Segunda Edición. Editorial UNED, San José, Costa Rica. 256p. [ Links ]

Hernández-Montiel LG, Holguín-Peña J, López-Aburto MG y Troyo-Diéguez E. 2011. Control poscosecha de Geotrichum citri-aurantii en limón mexicano (Citrus aurantifolia [christm.] swingle) mediante levaduras marinas y epífitas. Universidad y Ciencia 27(2):191-198. [ Links ]

Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberg PC y Winn WC. 2004. Diagnóstico microbiológico. Sexta edición. Editorial Médica Panamericana, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 1696p. [ Links ]

Márquez-Fernández O, Cano M, Salinas A, Guzmán-López O, Espinoza Cy Trigos A. 2013. Composición química de glomérulos producidos por Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Revista Mexicana de Micología 38:1-7. [ Links ]

Mendoza-Zamora C. 1996. Enfermedades fungosas de hortalizas. Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola. Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, México. 85 p. [ Links ]

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA. 177p. [ Links ]

Nelson PE y With S. 1956. An undescribed fungus causing a root rot of strawberry. Mycology 48: 548-551. [ Links ]

Nigam P y Singh D. 2000. Metabolic pathways: production secondary metabolites-fungi. Pp: 1319-1328 : Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology (Robinson RK, Batt CA, Patel PD. eds.). Academic Press, London, UK. 2372p. [ Links ]

Pedrero F, Kalavrouziotis I, Alarcón JJ, Koukoulakis P y Asano T. 2010. Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture - Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agriculture Water Management 97(9):1233-1241. [ Links ]

Romero-Cova, S. 1988. Hongos fitopatógenos. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, México. 347p. [ Links ]

Sepúlveda-Chavera GF. 1998. Gliocladium vermoeseni (Biouge) Thom.: Agente causal del decaimiento y muerte de la Palma real (Chrysalidocarpus lutescens L.) en América. IDESIA 15: 59-63. [ Links ]

Trigos Á, Mendoza G, Luna M, Heredia Gy Arias RM. 2005. Evaluación antibacteriana de hongos microscópicos del suelo y restos vegetales. Revista Mexicana de Micología 20:89-92. [ Links ]

Trigos Á, Castellanos O, Salinas A, Espinoza Cy Yáñez MJ. 2006. Antibiotic activity of several phytopathogenic fungi. Micología Aplicada Internacional 18(1):3-6. [ Links ]

Trigos Á, Ramírez K y. Salinas A 2008. Presencia de hongos fitopatógenos en frutas u hortalizas y su relación en la seguridad alimentaria. Revista Mexicana de Micología 28:125-129. [ Links ]

Trigos Á, Mendoza G, Espinoza C, Salinas A, Fernández JJ y Norte M. 2011. The role of macrosporin in necrotic spots. Phytochemistry Letters 4:122-125. [ Links ]

Zhao Y, Tu K, Shao X, Jing W y Sua Z. 2008. Effects of the yeast Pichia guilliermondii against Rhizopus nigricans on tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 49:113-120. [ Links ]

Received: July 13, 2014; Accepted: December 01, 2014

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License