SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 número251Controles de capital chilenos al requisito de no renumerada como mecanismo de selección índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Investigación económica

versión impresa ISSN 0185-1667

Inv. Econ vol.64 no.251 México ene./mar. 2005

 

Articles

Credit use, factor substitution and rural income distribution: a study on maize farmers in occidental Honduras

Uso de crédito, sustitución de factores y distribución del ingreso rural: un estudio sobre los agricultores de maíz en Honduras Occidental

Ruerd Ruben* 

Hubert Kolk* 

* Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, Development Economics Group, Netherlands <ruerd.ruben@wur.nl>.

ABSTRACT

Credit is usually considered as an important device for adjusting farmers' resource management and livelihood strategies. Farmers with better access to financial services are supposed to be able to increase their marginal returns to variable production factors like labor and fertilizers. Factor substitution is likely to take place towards more intensive production systems that are better able to guarantee food security and to enhance sustainable land use.

We made a study of maize farmers located in the Occidental department of Lempira in Honduras to analyze the impact of credit use on marginal returns to land, labor and fertilizers subject to the availability of credit. It was found that factor shares of labor and fertilizers substantially increased for farmers using credit, whereas the factor share of land was strongly reduced. The relative position of landowners is subject to deterioration, while the influence of input providers is likely to increase. Given the complementarities between fertilizers and labor, credit could be an important instrument for adjusting rural class relations.

RESUMEN

El crédito ha sido considerado comúnmente como una estrategia importante para influir en el manejo de recursos y las estrategias de sobrevivencia campesina. Los productores con mejor acceso a recursos financieros tienen más opciones para incrementar el retorno marginal de factores variables de producción, tales como trabajo y fertilizantes. Es probable que la sustitución de factores se lleva a cabo hacia sistemas de producción más intensivos que puedan garantizar mejor la seguridad alimentaria y favorecer el uso sostenible de los suelos.

Hemos realizado un estudio entre productores de maíz ubicados en el departamento occidental de Lempira en Honduras para analizar el impacto del uso de crédito sobre el retorno marginal de tierra, trabajo y fertilizantes. Encontramos que las proporciones atribuidas a trabajo y fertilizantes aumentaron considerablemente para campesinos que utilizan crédito, que la proporción del factor tierra se redujo fuertemente. La posición relativa de terratenientes tiende a deteriorarse, pero la influencia de suministradores de insumos puede incrementar. Dadas las complementaridades entre fertilizantes y trabajo, el crédito puede ser un importante instrumento para cambiar las relaciones de clase en el campo.

JEL Classification: D24, D33, Q14.

Texto completo disponible sólo en PDF

Full text available only in PDF format

References

Adams, D., D. Graham and J. von Pischke (eds.), Undermining Rural Development with Cheap Credit, Boulder, Co., Westview Press, 1984. [ Links ]

Barbier, B. and G. Bergeron, Natural Resource Management in the Hillsides of Honduras: Bioeconomic Modeling at the Watershed Level, Research Report 123, Washington D.C., International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2001. [ Links ]

Bisaliah, S., Technological Change and Functional Income Distribution Effects in Indian Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis, Artha Vijnana, 24, 1, 1982, pp. 1-14. [ Links ]

Byerlee, D., “Technology Transfer Systems for Improved Crop Management: Lessons for the Future”, in J.R. Anderson (ed.), Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community, Wallingford, CAB International, 1994, pp. 208-230. [ Links ]

Chow, G.C., “Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions”, Econometrica, 28, 1960, pp. 591-605. [ Links ]

Clercx, L., M. Falck, R. Kortekaas, E. Baumeister, M. Deugd, V. Rodriguez, B. Triguero, P. Washington and D. Barth, Servicios financieros rurales y economía campesina sostenible, San José, Costa Rica, CDR-ULA, 2000. [ Links ]

Hayami, Y. and K. Otsuka, The Economics of Contract Choice: An Agrarian Perspective, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993. [ Links ]

Hicks, J.B., The Theory of Wages, London, Macmillan & Co., 1963. [ Links ]

Hulme, D. and P. Mosley, Finance Against Poverty, London and New York, Routledge, 1996. [ Links ]

Iqbal, F., “The Demand and Supply of Funds Among Agricultural Households in India”, in I. Singh, L. Squire and S. Strauss (eds.), Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications and Policy, Baltimore and London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 183-205. [ Links ]

Isgut, A.E., “Nonfarm Income and Employment in Rural Honduras: Assessing the Role of Locational Factors”, Journal of Development Studies, 40 (3), 2004, pp. 59-86. [ Links ]

Jansen, H.G.P., A. Damon, J. Pender, W. Wielemaker and R.A. Schipper, “Policies for Sustainable Development in the Hillsides of Honduras”, Agricultural Economics (forthcoming), 2003. [ Links ]

Ledgerwood, J., Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective, Washington D.C., The World Bank, 1999. [ Links ]

Lee, D.R., C.B. Barrett (eds.), Tradeoffs or Synergies? Agricultural Intensification, Economic Development and the Environment in Developing Countrie, Wallingford, CAB International , 2000. [ Links ]

Pindyck, R.S. and D.L. Rubinfeld, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th edition, Singapore, McGraw-Hill, 1998. [ Links ]

Reardon, T. and S.A. Vosti, “Links between Rural Poverty and Environment in Developing Countries: Asset Categories and Investment Poverty”, World Development, 23 (9), 1995, pp. 1495-1506. [ Links ]

Robinson, M.S., The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor, Washington D.C., World Bank, 2001. [ Links ]

Ruben, R., P. van den Berg, M.S. van Wijk and N. Heerink, Evaluación económica de sistemas de producción con alto y bajo uso de recursos externos: el uso del frijol abono en la agricultura de ladera, San José, Washington, Proceedings IFPRI/IICA workshop on Policy Research for Natural Resource Management in the Central American Hillsides, 1997. [ Links ]

Ruben, R. and M. van den Berg, “Non-farm Employment and Poverty Alleviation of Rural Farm Households in Honduras”, World Development, 29 (3), 2001, pp. 549-560. [ Links ]

Ruben, R. , H. Ton and L. Clerx, “Rural Finance, Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Land Use: The Role of Credit for the Adoption of Agroforestry Systems in Occidental Honduras”, Journal of Rural Microfinance, 2003 (in press). [ Links ]

Singh, W.K., “Technological Change and Functional Income Distribution in Manipur Agriculture”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54 (2), 1999, pp. 220-227. [ Links ]

Satapathy, S.K. and S. Tripathy, “An Economic Analysis of Borrower and Non-borrower Rice Farmers in Cuttack District of Orissa”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (1), 2001, pp. 89-99. [ Links ]

Singh, J.P. and S.K. Rawat, “Impact of Farm Credit on Agriculture in Deoria District of Eastern Uttar Pradesh”, Indian Cooperative Review, 38 (3), 2001, pp. 182-192. [ Links ]

Udry, C., “Credit Markets in Northern Nigeria: Credit as Insurance in a Rural Economy”, World Bank Economic Review, 4 (3), 1990, pp. 251-69. [ Links ]

Van den Berg, M.M., Off-Farm Income, Risk and Agricultural Production: a Case Study of Smallholders in India’s Semi-arid Tropics, PhD thesis Wageningen Univertsity, Wageningen 2001. [ Links ]

Wilk, R.R., The Household Economy: Reconsidering the Domestic Mode of Production, Boulder Co., Westview Press, 1989. [ Links ]

Yaron, J., “What Makes Rural Finance Institutions Successful?”, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 150, Washington D.C. (also published in World Bank Research Observer 9 (1), 1992, pp. 49-70). [ Links ]

Received: November 2003; Accepted: September 2004

* Field data for this paper is collected by a research team of the Center for Rural Development Studies (CDR) of Free University Amsterdam, in close cooperation with the Pan-American School for Agriculture “El Zamorano” and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) rural development program “Lempira Sur”.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License