SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número246Chicago, Keynes y la política fiscalAnálisis de la polarización del ingreso de los hogares en México durante 1984-2000 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Investigación económica

versión impresa ISSN 0185-1667

Inv. Econ vol.62 no.246 Ciudad de México oct./dic. 2003

 

Artículos

A Cycle-Specific Approach to Business Cycles: Empirical Evidence from the G7

Un enfoque de ciclo específico para el ciclo económico: evidencia empírica para el G7

Marco Gallegati* 

Mauro Gallegati* 

* Dipartimento di Economia, Università di Ancona, Ancona, Italy. E-mail: marcog@deanovell.unian.it and gallegati@deanovell.unian.it.


Abstract:

The goal of the paper consists in investigating if co-movements in some selected time series are common to various countries and cyclical phases. To do so, we use 18 economic time series (GDP and demand components, employment and wages, money and prices, interest rates and stock prices) between 1960:1-1998:IV for the G7 countries. The country-specific approach shows regularity in terms of co-movements and periodicity with respect to the GDP, in most of the series. In particular, consumption and investment among the aggregate demand components, employment and productivity, and, to a lesser degree, the consumers' and GDP price indexes, their inflation rates and the stock market index, are stable across countries, while the exogenous component of the national income series, the monetary variables, the interest rates and the nominal wage level are not. Moreover, we propose a cycle-specific approach which aims at testing if GDP-co-movements in aggregate time series are robust i.e. If they are common to various countries within each single cyclical episode. As regards the cycle-specific approach, the analysis of pairwise correlation coefficients within individual cyclical episodes shows that the real and labour market variable co-movements with GDP are stable across cycles for each country, while policy, wage and price variables are not. Both UK and US, whose wages and prices co-movements with GDP variables are stable across cycles, are an exception among the G7. Since our findings show that prices, interest rates and the costs of the factors do not behave uniformly across cycles and group of countries, a more cautious approach to the analysis of the business cycle should be taken. In particular, the results emerging from the cycle-specific approach may have important policy implications: first, if business cycles "are not all alike" policymakers reaction functions should be, at least, "cycle-specific", and second, looking at UK and US exceptions, they should be even "country-specific".

Resumen:

El objetivo de este artículo es investigar si los co-movimientos de algunas series de tiempo seleccionadas son comunes para varios países y fases cíclicas. Por consiguiente, usamos 18 series de tiempo económicas (PIB y componentes de la demanda, empleo y salarios, dinero y precios, tasas de interés y acervo de precios) entre 1960: 1-1998: IV para los países del G7. El enfoque por países muestra regularidad en términos de co-movimientos y periodicidad con respecto al PIB en la mayoría de las series. En particular, el consumo y la inversión entre los componentes de la demanda agregada, el empleo y la productividad y, en menor grado, los índices de precios del PIB y del consumidor, la tasa de inflación y el índice del mercado de valores son estables de un país a otro, mientras los componentes exógenos de las series de ingreso nacional, las variables monetarias, la tasa de interés y el nivel del salario nominal no lo son. Además, proponemos un enfoque de ciclo específico el cual aspira a probar si los co-movimientos del PIB en las series de tiempo agregadas son robustas, i. e., si hay similitud para varios países. El análisis pareado de los coeficientes de correlación con episodios cíclicos individuales muestran que los co-movimientos de las variables reales y el mercado de trabajo para con el PIB son estables a través de los ciclos para cada país, mientras las determinadas por la política, esto es las variables salarios y precios, no lo son. Tanto el Reino Unido como Estados Unidos, cuyos co-movimientos en salarios y precios para con las variables del PIB son estables a través de los ciclos, son una excepción en el G7. Nuestros hallazgos muestran que los precios, la tasa de interés y el costo de los factores no se comportan uniformemente a través de los ciclos y grupos de países, sería apropiado un enfoque más cauteloso para el análisis de los ciclos económicos. En particular, el resultado emergente para el enfoque ciclo específico puede tener importantes implicaciones políticas: primero, si los ciclos económicos "no son todos semejantes" las funciones de reacción de los hacedores de política detenían, a lo menos, el "ciclo específico" y, segundo, se observan excepciones en Reino Unido y Estados Unidos, entonces esas reacciones deberían ser "país específico".

JEL Clasification: E31, E32.

Texto completo disponible sólo en PDF

Full text available only in PDF format

References

Abraham K. C. and J. C. Haltinwanger, “Real Wages and the Business Cycle”, Journal of Economic Literature, No. 33, 1995, pp. 1215-1264. [ Links ]

Ambler S., Cardia E. and C. Zimmermann, “International Business Cycles: What are the Facts?”, Working Paper, No. 90, CREFE, Université du Quebec à Montréal, 1999. [ Links ]

Backus D. K. and P. J. Kehoe, “International Evidence on the Historical Properties of Business Cycles”, in American Economic Review, No. 82, 1992, pp. 864-888. [ Links ]

Backus D., Kehoe P. and F. Kydland, “International Business Cycles: Theory and Evidence”, in T.C. Cooley (eds.) Frontiers of Business Cycles Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton N. J., 1995. [ Links ]

Ball L. and N. G. Mankiw, “A Sticky-Price Manifesto”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41, 1994, pp. 127-51. [ Links ]

Basu S., “Technology and Business Cycles: How Well Do Standard Models Explain the Facts?”, in Fuhrer J.C. and S. Schuh (eds.) Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycles?, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 42, 1998. [ Links ]

Basu S. and A. M. Taylor, “Business Cycles in International Historical Perspective”, NBER Working Paper, No. 4698, 1999. [ Links ]

Baxter M. and R. G. King, “Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series”, NBER Working Paper, No. 5022, 1995. [ Links ]

Bergman U. M., Bordo M. D. and L. Jonung, “Historical evidence on Business Cycles: the International Experience”, in Fuhrer J.C. and S. Schuh (eds.) Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycles?, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 42, 1998. [ Links ]

Blackburn K. and M. O. Ravn, “Business Cycles in the United Kingdom: Facts and Fiction”, in Economica, No. 59 (236), 1992, pp. 383-401. [ Links ]

Blanchard O., “La disoccupazione in Europa: il Ruolo degli Shock a delle Istituzioni”, Lezioni Paolo Baffi di Moneta e Finanza, Banca d’Italia, Roma, 1999. [ Links ]

Blanchard O. and M.Watson, “Are Business Cycles All Alike?”, in R. Gordon (eds.) The American Business Cycle, NBER, The Univesrity of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986. [ Links ]

Brandner P. and K. Neusser, “Business Cycles in open economies: stylized facts for Austria and Germany”, Working Paper, No. 40, Austrian Institute of Economic Research, 1990. [ Links ]

Bry G. and C. Boschan, “Cyclical Analysis of Time Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs”, NBER Technical Paper, No. 20, 1971. [ Links ]

Burns A. F. and W. C. Mitchell, Measuring Business Cycles, NBER, New York, 1946. [ Links ]

Canova F. and G. De Nicolò, “On the Sources of Business Cycles in the G-7”, mimeo, 2000. [ Links ]

Chadha B. and E. Prasad, “Are Prices Counter-cyclical?”, IMF Staff Working Paper, No. 88, 1992. [ Links ]

Chatterjee S., “From Cycles to Shocks: Progress in Business-Cycle Theory”, Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, 2000, pp. 1-11. [ Links ]

Christodoulakis N., Dimelis S. P., and T. Kollintzas, “Comparisons of Business Cycles in the EC. Idiosyncracies and Regularities”, Economica, No. 62, 1995, pp. 1-27. [ Links ]

Cochrane J. H., “Shocks”, NBER Working Paper No. 4698, 1994. [ Links ]

Cooley T. F. and L. E. Ohanian, “The Cyclical Behaviour of Prices”, Journal of Monetary Economics, No. 28, 1991, pp. 25-60. [ Links ]

Correia I., Neves J. and S. Rebelo, “Business Cycles from 1850 to 1950. New Facts about Old Data”, European Economic Review, No. 37, 1992. [ Links ]

Cover J. P. and P. Pecorino, “Optimal Monetary Policy and the Correlation between Prices and Output”, WP Series, Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, No. 00-08-45, The University of Alabama, 2000. [ Links ]

Danthine J. P. and J. B. Donaldson, “Methodological and Empirical Issues in Real Business Cycle Theory”, in European Economic Review, No. 37, 1993, pp. 1-35. [ Links ]

Danthine J. and M. Girardine, “Business Cycles in Switzerland: A Comparative Study”, in European Economic Review, No. 33, 1989, pp. 31-50. [ Links ]

Delli Gatti D., and M. Gallegati, “Aggregate Dynamics and Financial Fragility”, mimeo, Università Cattolica Milano, 2000. [ Links ]

Dimelis S., Kollintzas T., Prodromidis K., Chalikias J. and N. Christodoulakis, “Main Stylized Facts of Greek Economic Aggregates: 1948-1989”, Institute for Economic Research , Athens University of Economics and Business, 1992. [ Links ]

Dopke J., “Stylized Facts of Euroland’s Business Cycle”, Jahrbucher f. Nationalokonomie u. Statistik, No. 219, 1999, pp. 591-610. [ Links ]

Englund P., Persson T. and L. Svensson, “Swedish Business Cycles: 1861-1988”, in Journal of Monetary Economics, No. 30, 1992, pp. 343-371. [ Links ]

Fiorito R. and T. Kollintzas, “Stylized Facts of Business Cycles in the G7 from a Real Business Cycles Perspective”, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 681, 1992. [ Links ]

Fuà G., Lo Sviluppo Economico in Italia, vol. I. Lavoro e reddito, Franco Angeli Editore, Milano, 1981. [ Links ]

Fuhrer J. C. and S. Schuh (eds.), Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycles?, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 42, 1998. [ Links ]

Gallegati Marco and Mauro Gallegati, “European Business Cycles”, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, No. 149, Università di Ancona, 2001. [ Links ]

Gallegati Mauro and L. M. Stanca, Le fluttuazioni economiche in Italia, 1861-1995 ovvero, il camaleonte e il virus dell’influenza, G.Giappichelli Editore, Torino, 1998. [ Links ]

Gayer A., W. Rostow and A. Schwartz, The Growth and Fluctuations of the British Economy 1790-1850, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1953. [ Links ]

den Haan W.J., “The Comovements Between Real Activity and Prices at Different Business Cycle Frequencies”, NBER Working Paper, No. 5553, 1996. [ Links ]

Haberler G., Prosperity and Depression, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1958. [ Links ]

Hartley J.E., “Real Myths and a Monetary Fact”, Applied Economics, No. 31, 1999, pp. 1325-1329. [ Links ]

Heilemann U. and H. J. Munch, “Classification of West German Business Cycle 1955-1994”, Jahrbucher f. Nationalokonomie u. Statistik, No. 219, 1999, pp. 632-656. [ Links ]

Hodrick R. and E. Prescott, “Post-war US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation, in Working Paper”, Carnegie-Mellon University, printed in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, No. 29, 1981, pp. 1-16. [ Links ]

Kraay A. and J. Ventura, “Product Prices and the OECD Cycle”, NBER WP Series, No. 7788, 2000. [ Links ]

Kydland F. E. and E. C. Prescott, “Business Cycles: Real Facts and a Monetary Myth”, in Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Spring, 1990, pp. 3-18. [ Links ]

Lucas R. E., “Understanding Business Cycles”, in Brunner D. e A. H. Meltzer (eds), Stabilization of the Domestic and International Economy, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1977. [ Links ]

Maddison A., Phases of Capitalistic Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982. [ Links ]

Maddison A., Le Forze dello Sviluppo Capitalistico. Un Confronto di Lungo Periodo, 1995. [ Links ]

Pakko M.R., “The Cyclical Relationship between Output and Prices: An Analysis in the Frequency Domain”, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, No. 32, 2000, pp. 382-399. [ Links ]

Romer C., “Inflation and the Growth Rate of Output”, NBER Working Paper Series, No.5575, 1996. [ Links ]

Schumpeter J., “The Historical Approach to the Analysis of Business Cycles”, in Conference on Business Cycles, NBER, New York, 1951. [ Links ]

Sichel D. E., “Business Cycle Asymmetry: a Deeper Look”, Economic Inquiry, No. 31, 1993, pp. 224-36. [ Links ]

Stock J. and M. Watson, “Testing for Common Trends”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, No. 83, 1998, pp. 1097-1107. [ Links ]

Stockey T. M., “Empirical Approaches to the Problem of Aggregation Over Individuals”, Journal of Economic Literature, December, No. 31, 1993, pp. 1827-1874. [ Links ]

Temin, “The Causes of American Business Cycles: An Essay in Economic Historiography”, in Fuhrer J.C. and S. Schuh (eds.) Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycles?, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 42, 1998. [ Links ]

Wolf H., “Procyclical Prices: a Demi-myth, mimeo, MIT, 2000. [ Links ]

Zarnowitz V., Theory, History, Indicators, and Forecasting, NBER, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992. [ Links ]

______, Has the Business Cycles Been Abolished?, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6367, 1998. [ Links ]

______, “Theory and History Behind Business Cycles: are the 1990s the Onset of a Golden Age”, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7010, 1999 [ Links ]

Zimmermann, “A View of Recessions from the Automotive Industry”, in Fuhrer J. C. and S. Schuh (eds.), Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycles?, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 42, 1998. [ Links ]

Received: November 2002; Accepted: June 2003

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License