SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número246Un enfoque de ciclo específico para el ciclo económico: evidencia empírica para el G7 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Investigación económica

versión impresa ISSN 0185-1667

Inv. Econ vol.62 no.246 Ciudad de México oct./dic. 2003

 

Artículos

Chicago, Keynes and Fiscal Policy

Chicago, Keynes y la política fiscal

Esteban Pérez Caldentey* 

* Economic Affairs Officer, ECLAC (Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago). E-mail: eperezcaldentey@hotmail.com.


Abstract:

During the first half of the 1930's, the founders of the Chicago School of economics and John Maynard Keynes in England advocated public works as a cure for unemployment and a way to overcome the Great Depression. Counter cyclical fiscal policy was seen as a feasible strategy to attenuate the phases of the economic cycle and was advocated on the basis of market rigidities and the impotency of monetary policy.

By the end of the decade both Chicago economists and Keynes had departed from this fiscal policy stance. The former became concerned with the inflationary consequences of expansionary fiscal policies, especially when there was the temptation to implement them pro cyclically. Ultimately, fiscal issues were overshadowed by monetary policy concerns.

Keynes remained an advocate of counter cyclical fiscal policy but recanted from the instruments he had proposed earlier to combat economic fluctuations. Using the framework he developed in the General Theory (1936), he extended the division of income (consumption) and non-income (investment) related categories to the government's budget. Thus, Keynes distinguished between a current (government consumption) and a capital (government investment) budget. The current budget was to be in balance or show a surplus to finance the capital budget, which in turn played the fundamental stabilizing role. This allowed him to advance two different concepts of fiscal policy, capital and deficit budgeting. Capital budgeting, to which he adhered under the assumption of capital scarcity, meant rejecting the short-term stabilization tools associated with deficit budgeting (public works and the use of taxation to alter consumption patterns). Once the capital saturation point was reached fiscal policy could change its focus from investment to consumption and perhaps from capital to deficit budgeting.

Resumen:

En la primera mitad de la década de los años treinta los padres fundadores de la escuela de economía de Chicago y John Maynard Keynes en Inglaterra propusieron la puesta en marcha de trabajos públicos para combatir el desempleo y sobreponerse a la Gran Depresión. Frente a la rigidez de los precios de mercado y la impotencia de la política monetaria, la política fiscal contra cíclica pasó a ser vista como una estrategia viable y capaz de atenuar las fases del ciclo económico.

A finales de la década tanto los economistas de Chicago como Keynes renunciaron al uso de este tipo de incentivos fiscales. Los economistas de Chicago centraron su rechazo en el potencial inflacionario de la política fiscal expansiva y enfocaron sus preocupaciones hacia los aspectos monetarios de la política fiscal.

Por su parte Keynes mantuvo su apoyo a la política fiscal contra cíclica absteniéndose de recomendar los instrumentos que había propuesto anteriormente para combatir las fluctuaciones económicas. Utilizando el marco teórico que desarrolló en la Teoría General (1936), Keynes distinguió entre el presupuesto corriente y el de capital. El presupuesto corriente debía mostrar un equilibrio o un superávit con el fin de financiar el gasto en capital que actuaría como estabilizador del ciclo económico. Keynes distinguió así entre dos conceptos de política fiscal (la política fiscal compensatoria y la política fiscal basada en la programación de los gastos de capital). El segundo tipo de política fiscal, válido bajo la suposición de escasez del factor capital, suponía el rechazo de los instrumentos de estabilización fiscal de corto plazo (trabajos públicos y el uso de los impuestos para alterar los patrones de consumo). Más allá del punto de saturación del capital, la política fiscal podría cambiar su enfásis hacia el consumo y su rol compensatorio.

JEL Clasification: E12, E62, E65.

Texto completo disponible sólo en PDF

Full text available only in PDF format

References

Arestis, Ph. and M. Glickman, “The Modern Relevance of post-Keynesian Economic Policies”, in S. Sharma (ed.), John Maynard Keynes. Keynesianism into the Twenty-first Century, Northhampton, Edward Elgar, 1998. [ Links ]

Andrews, W. (Ed.), Concise Dictionary of American History, New York, Scribners Sons, 1962. [ Links ]

Artis, M. J., “Deficit Spending”, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, New York, Macmillan, 1987. [ Links ]

Chick, V., On Money, Method and Keynes. Selected Essays, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1992. [ Links ]

Clark, J. M., “An Appraisal of the Workability of Compensatory Devices”, The American Economic Review, 1939, Supplement; reprinted in The American Economic Association, 1951. [ Links ]

Clarke, P., The Keynesian Revolution in the Making 1924-1936, New York, Oxford University Press, 1990. [ Links ]

Colander, D., “Was Keynes a Keynesian or a Lernerian?”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXII, 1984, pp.1572-1575. [ Links ]

Davidson, P., Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory, Vermont, Edward Elgar, 1994. [ Links ]

Davis, A. M., Currency and banking in the Province of the Massachusetts Bay, 2000, internet (originally published 1900). [ Links ]

Davis, J. R., “Chicago Economists, Deficit Budgets, and the Early 1930’s”, The American Economic Review, vol. LVIII, No. 3, Part I, 1968, pp. 476-482. [ Links ]

Douglas, P., Controlling Depressions, New York, W. W. Norton & Company Inc, 1935. [ Links ]

Douglas, P. and Aaron Director, The Problem of Unemployment, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1931. [ Links ]

Fisher, I., The Purchasing Power of Money, New Jersey, Kelley, 1985 (originally published 1911). [ Links ]

Franklin, B., A Modest Enquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a paper-Currency, 2000, internet (originally published 1729). [ Links ]

Friedman, M., “The Monetary Theory and Policy of Henry Simons”, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 10, October 1967,; reprinted in Friedman , 1969. [ Links ]

______, The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays, Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company, 1969. [ Links ]

______, “M. Comments on the Critics”, in R. Gordon (ed.), Milton Friedman’s Monetary Framework, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1982. [ Links ]

Garvy, G., “Keynes and the Economic Activists of Pre-Hitler Germany”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, No. 2, 1975, pp. 391-405. [ Links ]

Goodwin, L., The Populist Moment, New York, Oxford University Press, 1978. [ Links ]

Haley, B. F., “The Federal Budget: Economic Consequences of Deficit Financing”, American Economic Review, Proceedings, 1941; reprinted in Smithies and Butters, 1951. [ Links ]

Hall, P. A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism Accross Nations, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1989. [ Links ]

Hofstadter, R., The American Political Tradition, New York, Vintage Books, 1974 (originally published 1948). [ Links ]

Laidler, D., Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999. [ Links ]

Laidler, D., The Golden Age of the Quantity Theory, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1991. [ Links ]

Laidler, D., Highlights of the Bullionist Controversy, mimeo, 2000. [ Links ]

Lekachman, R. (ed.), Keynes’ General Theory. Reports from Three Decades, Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1964. In Spanish. [ Links ]

Lutz, H., “Federal Depression Financing and Its Consequences.” The Harvard Business Review, 1938; reprinted in Smithies and Butters, 1951. [ Links ]

Kahn, R. F., The Making of Keynes’ General Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1984. [ Links ]

Keynes, J. M., Essays in Persuasion, New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1931. [ Links ]

______, “An Open Letter”, The New York Times, December 31, 1933; reprinted in Smithies and Butters, 1955. [ Links ]

______, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, New York, HBJ publishers, 1964 (originally published 1936). [ Links ]

______, A Treatise on Money, Vol. I. London, Macmillan & Co LTD, 1965 (originally published 1930). [ Links ]

______, “Essays in Persuasion”, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. IX, New York, The Macmillan Press, 1972. [ Links ]

______, “The General Theory and After. Part I Preparation”, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIII, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1973. [ Links ]

______, “Activities 1940- 1946”, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XXVII, New York, The Macmillan Press, 1980. [ Links ]

______, “Activities 1922-1929, Parts I and II”, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIX, New York, The Macmillan Press, 1981. [ Links ]

Knight, F., “The Business Cycle, Interest, and Money A Methodological Approach”, The Review of Economic and Statistics, vol. XXIII, No. 2, 1941; reprinted in Knight, 1963. [ Links ]

______, On the History and Method of Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1963. [ Links ]

Koenig L. W., A Political Biography of Williams Jennings Bryan, New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1971. [ Links ]

Kregel, J., “Budget Deficits, Stabilization Policy and Liquidity Preference: Keynes’s Post War Policy Proposals”, in F. Vicarelli (ed.), Keynes’s Relevance Today, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985. [ Links ]

Meltzer, A. H., Keynes’s Monetary Theory. A Different Interpretation, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990. [ Links ]

Myrdal G., “Fiscal Policy in the Business Cycle”, The American Economic Review, Supplement, 1939; reprinted in Smithies and Butters, 1951. [ Links ]

Patinkin, D. and Leith J. C. Keynes (eds.), Cambridge and the General Theory, London, The Macmillan Press LTD, 1977. [ Links ]

Patinkin, D., Anticipations of the General Theory?, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1982. [ Links ]

Phillips, R. J., The Chicago Plan & New Deal Banking, New York, M. E. Sharpe, 1995. [ Links ]

Reder, M. W., “Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XX, 1982, pp. 1-38. [ Links ]

Ricardo D., “Plan for the Establishment of a National Bank”, in Sraffa, P. (ed.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. IV, Pamphlets and Papers, 1815-1823, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1951 (originally published 1824). [ Links ]

Scitovsky, T., “Lerner’s Contribution to Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXII, 1984, pp. 1547-1571. [ Links ]

Seccareccia, M., “Socialization of Investment” in Phil Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Radical Political Economy, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 1994. [ Links ]

Simons, H. C., A Positive Program for Laissez Faire. Some Proposals for a Liberal Economic Policy, Public Pamphlet, 1934, No.15, Harry D. Gideonse; reprinted in Simons, 1962. [ Links ]

______, “Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. XLIV, No. 1, 1936, pp. 1-30; reprinted in Simons, 1962. [ Links ]

______, Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1962. [ Links ]

Skidelski, P. L., “Keynes and Employment Policy in the Second World War”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 21, No. 1, 1998, pp. 39-50. [ Links ]

Smithies, A. and Butters, J. K., Readings in Fiscal Policy, Homewood, Richard, D. Irwin, Inc, 1955. [ Links ]

Spiegel, H. W., “Viner, Jacob (1892-1970)”, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, New York, Macmillan, 1987. [ Links ]

Smithin, J., “The Composition of Government Expenditures and the Effectiveness of Fiscal Policy”, in Ed. John Pheby, New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics, Northampton, Edward Elgar. [ Links ]

Tavlas, G. S., “Chicago, Harvard, and the Doctrinal Foundations of Monetary Economics”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 105, No. 1, 1997, pp. 153-177. [ Links ]

The American Economic Association, Readings in Business Cycle Theory, Homewood, Richard D. Irwin, Inc, 1951. [ Links ]

Warburton, C., “The Monetary Theory of Deficit Spending”, The Review of Economic Statistics, vol. XXVII, No. 2 and vol. XXVIII, No. 2, 1945-1946, pp. 92-94; reprinted in Warburton, 1966. [ Links ]

Warbuton, C., Depression, Inflation, And Monetary Policy. Selected Papers, 1945-1953, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1966. [ Links ]

Williamson, J. H. “Deficit Spending”, The American Economic Review, Supplement, 1941; reprinted in The American Economic Association, 1951. [ Links ]

Winch, D., “The Keynesian Revolution in Sweden”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. LXXIV, No. 2, 1996, pp. 168-176. [ Links ]

Young, W., Harrod and his Trade Cycle Group, New York, New York University Press, 1989. [ Links ]

Received: August 2002; Accepted: May 2003

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License