SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número4Detección de Rickettsia typhi en Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. y Amblyomma mixtum en el sur de MéxicoDesarrollo oogénico y ciclo gonotrófico de Aedes aegypti y Aedes albopictus en laboratorio índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Salud Pública de México

versión impresa ISSN 0036-3634

Salud pública Méx vol.62 no.4 Cuernavaca jul./ago. 2020  Epub 16-Mayo-2022

https://doi.org/10.21149/10129 

Artículos originales

Molecular variation of Plasmodium vivax dehydrofolate reductase in Mexico and Nicaragua contrasts with that occurring in South America

Variación molecular de la dehidrofolato reductasa de Plasmodium vivax en México y Nicaragua contrasta con la que ocurre en Sudamérica

Lilia González-Cerón(1) 

Mario H Rodríguez(2) 

Alberto Montoya(3) 

Frida Santillán-Valenzuela(1) 

Josselin C Corzo-Gómez(1  4) 

(1) Centro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Tapachula, Chiapas, México.

(2) Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.

(3) Departamento de Parasitología, Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministerio de Salud. Managua, Nicaragua.

(4) Departamento de Biomedicina Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Ciudad de México, México.


Abstract:

Objective:

To research mutations associated to pyrimethamine resistance in dihydrofolate reductase (pvdhfr) of Plasmodium vivax from Mexico and Nicaragua and compare it to that reported in the rest of America.

Materials and methods:

Genomic DNA was obtained from P. vivax-infected blood samples. A pvdhfr gene fragment was amplified and sequenced. The identified gene variations were compared to those observed in other affected sites of America.

Results:

No mutations in pvdhfr were detected in P. vivax from Mexico and Nicaragua. One synonymous change and variation in the repeat domain was detected in Nicaraguan parasites. In South America, a high frequency of variant residues 58R and 117N associated to pyrimethamine resistance was reported.

Conclusions:

The lack of polymorphisms associated with pyrimethamine resistance suggests that drug-resistant P. vivax has not penetrated Mesoamerica, nor have local parasites been under selective pressure. These data contribute to establish the basis for the epidemiological surveillance of drug resistance.

Keywords: Plasmodium vivax; pvdhfr; polymorphism; pyrimethamine; Mexico; Nicaragua

Resumen:

Objetivo:

Determinar mutaciones en la dihydrofolato reductasa deP. vivax (Pvdhfr) en parásitos de México y Nicaragua, y comparar con lo reportado en América.

Material y métodos:

Del ADN de sangres infectadas con P. vivax de pacientes, el gen pvdhfr se amplifico y secuenció, y se contrastócon lo observado en América.

Resultados:

No se detectaron mutaciones asociadas con la resistencia debida a pirimetamina. Los parásitos de Nicaragua tuvieron una mutación sinónima y variación en la región repetida. Se reportaron frecuentes mutaciones asociadas con la resistencia a la pirimetamina en Sudamérica.

Conclusiones:

La ausencia de polimorfismos en Pvdhfr sugiere que no se han seleccionado ni introducido parásitos resistentes en la zona de estudio, lo que resulta muy útil para la vigilancia epidemiológica.

Palabras clave: Plasmodium vivax; pvdhfr; variación molecular; pirimetamina; México; Nicaragua

The overall progressive trend in the control of malaria worldwide halted in 2016. The estimated global incidence rate decreased from 76 to 63 cases (18%) per 1 000 people at risk; yet, although the estimated 216 million malaria cases that occurred in 2016 represent a decline compared to 237 million cases in 2010, this figure is higher than that (211 million) estimated for 2015.1

In Latin America, where Plasmodium vivax causes 60-70% of malaria cases, the incidence rate declined 67% between 2000 and 2014, i.e. from 1 181 000 cases in 2010 to 389 390 cases in 2014;1,2however, substantial increases occurred between 2015 and 2016. Venezuela contributed 34.4% of the cases in the region (240 000 cases, which amount to an increase of 76% in the country) and, together with Peru and Brazil, accumulated 65% of the cases in the region. In Nicaragua, fewer than 1 000 cases were reported between 2008 to 2011, but over 10 times more cases (10 846) were reported in 2017.3On the other hand, in Argentina, Ecuador, El Salvador, Mexico and Paraguay, substantial declines in the incidence of malaria have encouraged initiatives to accelerate its elimination. In Mexico, only 715 P. vivax cases were reported in 2017.4

A decrease in funding, a growing insecticide resistance of mosquito vectors, and an increasing resistance of malaria parasites to drugs are the main difficulties that hinder progress in the control and elimination of malaria.1In South America, chloroquine (CQ) and pyrimethamine were used in massive drug administration campaigns during the global malaria eradication initiative,5,6 and resistance of Plasmodium falciparum strains to both drugs was detected since the early 1960s.7,8 In the 1970s, pyrimethamine reformulated with sulfadoxine (SP) was re-introduced to fight CQ-resistant P. falciparum strains throughout the malaria-infested areas of the planet.9,10,11 In South America, P. falciparum resistant to SP was detected shortly after its introduction,12,13 and by the 1990s SP was replaced by other antimalarials, such as mefloquine, and tetracycline.14Currently, the standard treatment for P. falciparum is artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). ACTs recommended by the WHO include artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem), artesunate-mefloquine, artesunate-amodiaquine and artesunate-sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine.14,15

SP inhibits malaria parasites growth through sequential inhibition of folate biosynthesis. Pyrimethamine binding to dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and sulphadoxine binding to dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) inhibit these metabolic enzymes.15,16 In P. falciparum, mutations at DHFR residues C50R, N51I, C59R, S108N/T and I164L are associated to pyrimethamine resistance.11,17,18 SP alone is not recommended for treating P. vivaxinfections, because this parasite rapidly develops resistance.19,20 However, as P. vivax has coexisted with P. falciparum in most affected areas outside Africa,21,22 in patients with mixed infections, SP treatment to P. falciparum can unintentionally expose P. vivax to SP selective pressure.10,23 This explains why P. vivax expressing dhfr mutations associated to pyrimethamine resistance have been detected in most malaria areas under present or past SP treatment.24

Pvdhfr residues (F57, S58, T61, S117 and I173) correspond topologically to those that confer pyrimethamine resistance in P. falciparum.18,25In vitro studies in which a yeast system expressing different Pvdhfr haplotypes was utilized showed that residues 58R+117N might reduce sensitivity to pyrimethamine, but the accumulation of other mutations (e.g. 57L, 61M, 117T and 173F) may increase the risk of resistance to this drug.26,27 In South America, Pvdhfr mutations at codons S58R and I117N were reported.28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35 Resistance has also been documented in areas not exposed to SP, probably due to the introduction of resistant parasites through human migrations.36,37 Mexico and Central America have not officially used SP to treat malaria,15,38,39 and the molecular susceptibility status of local P. vivax to SP is unknown.

Mexico has brought malaria to pre-elimination status, and Central America struggles to advance control toward its elimination; both need evaluation of the pertinence of new treatment schemes. Molecular approaches would be helpful to establish surveillance strategies and map the dispersion of drug resistance strains. In the present study, Pvdhfr polymorphism was researched in parasites from southern Mexico and Nicaragua, and the results were compared to published studies in other affected sites of Latin America.

Materials and methods

Plasmodium vivax-infected blood samples were obtained from symptomatic patients seeking malaria diagnosis in Mexico and Nicaragua.40,41,42 The patients’ personal information was encrypted and only their municipality of origin was used for data interpretation. The Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico and the Ethics Committee of the National Center for Diagnosis and Reference (CNDR) of the Ministry of Health of Nicaragua approved the study.

P. vivax samples. From 2008 to 2010, 85 P. vivax-infected blood samples were obtained at the Regional Research Center for Public Health (CRISP-INSP), from patients living in southern Chiapas (SCH), the Mexican southernmost region bordering with Guatemala.40,41,42 In Nicaragua, the sentinel laboratory network established by the Health Ministry collected 100 blood samples. Seventy samples were from patients living in the North Caribbean Coast Autonomous Region (RACCN) in 2011-2012. Another 18 and 12 samples were obtained during an outbreak in 2012 and in 2006-200740 from the North Pacific Coast (NPC),42 respectively. Blood samples collected in filter paper (Whatman # 2) were dried and kept in the dark at 4°C until used.

Molecular analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using the QIAmp DNA blood Minikit protocol and reagents, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA USA). The oligonucleotides forward 5’-GACATTTACGCCATCTGCG -3’ (nt 25-44) and reverse 5’-CGTTGATCCTCGTGAAGTAGATC-3’ (nt 570-592) were used to amplify a Pvdhfr gene fragment comprising codons 57, 58, 61, 117 and 173. The PCR reactions were prepared as follows: 10μL of 5× PCR buffer, 4μL of MgCl2 (25mM), 2.5μL of dNTPs (1.25mM), 1.9 μL of each primer (10μM), 0.5μL of Go Taq DNA polymerase 5u/μL (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 2-4 μL of extracted DNA for a final volume of 50 μL. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 3 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles: 40s at 94 °C, 40s at 54 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; afterwards, there was a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min in a MyCycler thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR products of the correct molecular size were purified using a MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The purified products were Sanger-sequenced, using the forward and reverse primers, at the High Throughput Genomics Unit (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; http://www.htseq.org/). The consensus sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank [KX180639-KX180789]. Pvdhfr mutations and haplotypes were identified, and their frequency calculated for each study site. The Salvador I strain (Sal I) orthologous sequence XM_001615032 was used as reference.43 This strain is sensitive to pyrimethaminein vitro.12

Comparison of PvDHFR mutations among sites in America. Pvdhfr mutations and haplotypes detected in this study were compared to sequences reported in the literature on affected areas of Central and South America (NCBI, Google Scholar). Information referring to sample collection date, municipality/region and country, number of isolates, DNA sequences, synonymous and non-synonymous mutations (if available), prevalence of nucleotide/residue variants, haplotypes and their frequency were analyzed.

Results

A dhfr gene fragment comprising codons 16 - 198 was obtained from 151 parasites; 73 samples, from southern Mexico; 54, from RACCN, and 24 from NPC in Nicaragua. All Mexican sequence isolates and 55 (70.5%) from Nicaragua (51 from RACCN and four from NPC) were identical to that of Sal I (sensitive strain) (tables I and II). Only three parasites (5.5%) from RACCN had a synonymous mutation at codon Y69 (tat→tac). These parasites were obtained from blood samples of patients living in the Rosita, Bonanza and Waspam municipalities, between December 2011 and March 2012. Twenty samples from NPC (83.3%) had mutation at codon Y69 and 18 extra nucleotides coding for the TSGGDN domain, between codons 103 and 104, in 60% of the parasites collected in 2006 (n = 6) and 100% of the parasites collected in 2012 (n = 14) (table I).

Table I: Molecular variation in Plasmodium vivax dhfr in Latin America, 2001-2013 

Amino acid substitutions and their frequency, %
# residue: 57 58* 117 173 Other mutations:S, synonymous NS, nonsynonymous (%)S References
Sal I strain: F (ttc) S (agc) S (agc) I (att)
Amino acid substitution: L (ttg) R /N /K N (aac) L (ctt )
Samples origin Period N
Nicaragua (all areas) 2011-2012 78 - - - - S: Y69 (25.6) This study
Mexico (Southern) 2008-2010 73 - - - - - This study
Mexico (Southern) 2001-2008 19 - - - - NS: P322L (5.2) 28
Honduras (all areas) 2004-2009 59 3.4 3.4 - - S: Y69 (22), L39 (3), S85 (5) 44
Colombia 2005 9 - 100 100 - nucleotide changes not given 29
Colombia (all areas) 2001-2004 53 - 98.1 100 - nucleotide changes not given 30§
Colombia (Northern) 2011-2013 7 - 57/42.8/ 100 - 58R cgc, aga 31
Colombia (Pacific Coast) 2012-2013 24-31 - 73.3/4.1/ 100 - SN: A15V (3.2), H99N (41)/R (44). 58R [cgc, agg/aga] 28
Colombia (Amazon) Not indicated 41 2 83/-/15 98 17 S:Y69 (82.9), V19 (12.2). NS: A15V (12.2), N50I (2.4), G175E (5). 57L[ttg], 58 R[agg, aga], K[aag] 32
Peru (North) 2008-2013 21-37 - 95.4/22.8/ 100 2.7 58R [agg, aga], 58N [aac] 28
Brazil (Manaus) 2007-2008 19-14 - 79-64 84-93 5-36 Amino acid changes not given1 33,34
Brazil (Acre) 2011 2-4 - 100 100 50 - 28
French Guiana 2001-2005 90 - 98.9 100 34.4 S: Y69 (85.6), L19 (3.3). NS: A15V (6.7), S116G (3.5). 58R [agg,aga, cgt] 35

*Multiple codons.

Assuming the most common amino acid change.

§Genomic or genetic data available.

Single letter amino acid code: N, asparagine; F, phenylalanine; S, serine; I, isoleucine; G, glycine; L, leucine; R, arginine; T, threonine; E, glutamic acid; K, Lysine; Y, tyrosine; P, proline; V, valine; H, histidine; A, alanine.

Information concerning Pvdhfr gene polymorphism was obtained from French Guiana,35 Colombia,28,29,30,31,32 Peru,28 Brazil,28,33,34 Honduras44 and Mexico28 (tables I-III). In those previous studies, P. vivax-infected blood samples were collected between 2001 and 2013. A substitution at residue P322L in one of 19 isolates was reported in Southern Mexico. The synonymous mutation Y67 was reported in Honduras (22%) and, with a high frequency, in Colombia and French Guiana (82.9 and 85.6%, respectively). Haplotypes expressing 58R and 117N were reported in Colombia, French Guiana, Brazil and Peru (table I and II). Although variation at residues 57L and 173L was not very frequent in South America, it was reported at 173L in Brazil, Peru, French Guiana and Amazon Colombia. The amino acid change 57L was reported only in one isolate in Amazon Colombia and two isolates in Honduras (table I and II). Residues 58N/K were reported in Northern Peru and Amazon Colombia, respectively. Other mutations were private to certain geographic sites (table I). A tandem repeat sequence observed in the Sal I strain was also observed in samples collected in this study in Mexico and, less frequently, in the NPC of Nicaragua; it was also reported, at different high frequencies, in Honduras, French Guyana and Colombia (table III). A variation of these tandem repeat sequence detected in this study in NPC of Nicaragua was previously observed in Honduras. Other tandem sequence variations were reported for Colombian parasites (table III).

Table II: Differences in P. vivax DHFR haplotypes among parasites of Latin America 

Geographic origin/strain N Residues/haplotype % References
Sal I* strain (1980), Nicaragua strain (1980s), Panama strain (1966) 50-57-58-116-117-173-175/NFSSSIG 29, 43
Mexico (Southern) 73 NFSSSIG 100 This study
Nicaragua (all areas) 78 NFSSSIG 100 This study
Honduras 59 57-58-117-173/ FSSI LRSI 96.6 3.4 44
Colombia 9 57-58-61-117-173/FRTN 100 29
Colombia (Northern) 6 FRSNI 100 31
Colombia (all areas) 53 57-58-117/ FRN FRS 94.35.7 30
Colombia (Amazon) 41 50-57-58-117-173-175/ NLRSIG IFSNIG NFRNIG NFRNIE NFRNLG (triple mutant) NFKNIG 225951715 32
Belem strain/Brazil (1980) NFRSNI - 47
French Guiana 90 57-58-116-117-173/FSSNI FRSNI FRSNL FRSNI FRGNI FRSNL (triple mutant) 1.24.71.230.23.559.3 35

* Susceptiblle residues.

N: number of isolates.

Amino acids are indicated by one letter code: N, asparagine; F, phenylalanine; S, serine; I, isoleucine; G, glycine; L, leucine; R, arginine; T, threonine; E, glutamic acid.

Variant residues are underlined.

Table III: Limited tandem repeat types of the Pvdhfr in isolates from Latin America 

DHFR: tandem repeat arrangement: RACCN* NPC* SCH* HOND FG COL
Number of isolates:
54 24 73 54 90 48
%
GGDNTS‡ GGDNTH GGDNAD 100 17 100 78 100 75
GGDNTS GGDNTH GGDNTS GGDNAD 0 83 0 22 0 0
GGDNTS GGDNAD 0 0 0 0 0 16.7
GGDNTS GGDNTH GGDNTH GGDNAD 0 0 0 0 0 2.1

*This study.

Sal I strain sequence (NBCI, Gen Bank: XM_001615032): amino acids 89-106.

Place /date of sample collection: RACCN, North Atlantic Autonomous Region/2011-2012; NPC, North Pacific Coast/2006, 2012; SCH, Southern Chiapas Mexico/2008-2010; HOND, Honduras/2004-2009 (Ref. 44); FG, French Guiana/2001-2005 (Ref. 35); COL, Colombia/2001-2004 (Ref. 30). Amino acids are indicated by one letter code. G, glycine; D, aspartic acid; N, asparagine; T, threonine; H, histidine; A, alanine; S, serine.

Discussion

Mutations associated to pyrimethamine (PM) resistance were not detected in P. vivax dehydrofolate reductase from affected patients living in southern Mexico and Nicaragua. Accordingly, no mutations in dhfr were observed in P. falciparum in Honduras44 or Nicaragua.45 Interestingly, the variant repeat sequence found in NPC Nicaragua and reported in parasites from Honduras,44 might not be present in the RACCN of Nicaragua. The synonymous mutation at codon Y69 observed in parasites of Nicaragua, and in those of Honduras,44 Colombia32 and French Guiana,35 seem to be widely distributed: it was reported in parasites of South Korea46 and Thailand.47

On the other hand, those observations contrast with records from previous studies carried out in South America. Mutations at pvdhfr conferring pyrimethamine resistance, such as those found in residues 58R/N and 117N and haplotypes having both substitutions, have been very frequently detected in Colombia,28,29,30,31,32 Peru,28 French Guiana35 and Brazil.28,33,34 However, the distribution of parasites carrying other important mutations varies among regions of the same country. For instance, mutation 173L was reported at various frequencies in different locations of South America, the highest frequency (17%) occurring inP. vivaxin the Amazon region of Colombia,32 but was absent in samples collected in different regions of the same country.28,29,30,31 Other mutations were more restricted to certain sites, although few DNA sequences were available. In Panama,P. falciparumexpressing residues 51I-108N at DHFR was detected in malarious regions next to the Colombia border,48 indicating that P. vivax might had been also exposed to pyrimethamine in these regions.

Mutations 58R and 117N were reported to be common in malarious areas of Asia and Indonesia;27,30,49,50,51,52,53,54,55 the 57L substitution, rare in South America, was more frequent in South and Southeast Asia, and Oceania,29,30 and the double mutation 57L /58R reported in Honduras44 has been observed in Sri Lanka.29 Interestingly, the variant residue 173L seems to be exclusive of South America, while a different substitution (173F) was reported in South Korea, Myanmar,49 India27and Vanuatu.55 Furthermore, other amino acid substitutions conferring pyrimethamine resistance were unseen in Latin America, e.g. those present at residues 61 and 117. The variant T61M is frequently linked to S117T; both seem to have arisen in Thailand, Indonesia and Oceania.49

In South America, the emergence of pyrimethamine resistance arose under the pressure of SP implemented in the 1980s-1990s to treat P. falciparum.56,57,58,59Pfdhfr mutations associated to pyrimethamine resistance were documented shortly after at different sites and at various frequencies.48,56,57,59 At that time, mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infections were common in areas where SP were used, and resistant P. vivax resulted from bystander exposure.

In Mexico and in most of Central America, only chloroquine and primaquine have been used to treat malaria since the 1950s,15 while pyrimethamine was used in some malarious areas of South America and Panama,48,59 explaining the absence of Pvdhfr resistance-associated mutations in our samples and their variable distribution in the southern countries. Nevertheless, a consequence of past and current human migrations may be the introduction of resistant parasites into areas with no resistance. Our results suggest a lack of exposure of P. vivax to pyrimethamine and the non-introduction of parasites with Pvdhfr mutations conferring resistance to this drug in Mesoamerica. The pattern of mutations in Pvdhfr at a local and global level would help establish molecular surveillance and monitoring of the dispersion of drug resistant strains through human migration. Following the WHO’s recommendations to implement ACT (including artesunate-sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine)15 and choosing the best treatment requires, among other things, information on the susceptibility status ofP. vivaxin the region, an accurate diagnosis of the medical condition of the patient, and availability of anti-malarial medications.

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our gratitude to Conacyt-Mexico, project CB-2009-01-131247; the AMI/RAVEDRA-OPS/OMS-Nicaragua project, and the Global Fund Malaria Component-Nicaragua project.

References

World Health Organization. Malaria Report 2017. Geneva: WHO, 2017. [ Links ]

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Informe de la situación de Paludismo en las Américas, 2014. Washington DC: OPS, 2017. [ Links ]

Pan American Health Organization. Epidemiological Update. Increase of malaria in the Americas, 2018. Washington DC: OPS, 2018. [ Links ]

Secretaría de Salud. Boletín Epidemiológico Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica Sistema Único de Información. Mexico City: Sinave, 2017. [ Links ]

Gabaldon A, Berti AL. The first large area in the tropical zone to report malaria eradication: North-Central Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1954;3:793-807. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1954.3.793 [ Links ]

Pinotti M. New method of malaria prevention: combination of an antimalarial drug with table salt used daily in food. Rev Bras Malariol Doencas Trop. 1954;6(1):5-12. [ Links ]

Maberti S. The development of resistance to pyrimethamine. Presentation of 15 cases studied in Trujillo, Venezuela. Arch Venez Med Trop Parasitol Med. 1960;3:239-59. [ Links ]

Moore DV, Lanier JE. Observations on two Plasmodium falciparum infections with an abnormal response to chloroquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1961;10:5-9. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1961.10.5 [ Links ]

Wernsdorfer WH, Kouznetsov RL. Drug-resistant malaria--occurrence, control, and surveillance. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(3):341-52. [ Links ]

White NJ. Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1084-92. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200421682 [ Links ]

Contreras CE, Cortese JF, Caraballo A, Plowe CV. Genetics of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Venezuelan state of Bolivar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:400-5. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2002.67.400 [ Links ]

Godoy GA, Volcan GS, Guevara R, Medrano C, Castro J, Texeira A. Venezuelan strains of Plasmodium falciparum resistant to sulfa and pyrimethamine as demonstrated by in vitro test. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 1977;19:229-31. [ Links ]

Alecrim WD, Dourado H, Alecrim M das G, Passos LF, Wanssa E, Albuquerque B [In vivo resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the combination of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine, at RIII level, in Amazonas, Brazil];. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1982;24(suppl 6):52-3. [ Links ]

World Health Organization. Antimalarial durg combination therapy: report of a WHO technical consultation. Geneva: WHO/RBM, 2001. [ Links ]

World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria 2015. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO, 2015. [ Links ]

Yuthavong Y, Kamchonwongpaisan S, Leartsakulpanich U, Chitnumsub P. Folate metabolism as a source of molecular targets for antimalarials. Future Microbiol. 2006;1:113-25. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.1.1.113 [ Links ]

Picot S, Olliaro P, de Monbrison F, Bienvenu AL, Price RN, Ringwald P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for correlation between molecular markers of parasite resistance and treatment outcome in falciparum malaria. Malar J. 2009;8:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-89 [ Links ]

Alam MT, Bora H, Bharti PK, Saifi MA, Das MK, Dev V, et al. Similar trends of pyrimethamine resistance-associated mutations in Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:857-63. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01200-06 [ Links ]

Young MD, Burgess RW. Pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Bull World Health Organ. 1959;20(1):27-36. [ Links ]

Imwong M, Pukrittakayamee S, Looareesuwan S, Pasvol G, Poirreiz J, White NJ, et al. Association of genetic mutations in Plasmodium vivax dhfr with resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: geographical and clinical correlates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:3122-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.11.3122-3127.2001 [ Links ]

World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: WHO, 2015. [ Links ]

Haghdoost AA, Alexander N. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the interaction between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in humans. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007;44(1):33-43. [ Links ]

Stepniewska K, White NJ. Pharmacokinetic determinants of the window of selection for antimalarial drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1589-96. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00903-07 [ Links ]

Hawkins VN, Joshi H, Rungsihirunrat K, Na-Bangchang K, Sibley CH. Antifolates can have a role in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:213-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2007.03.002 [ Links ]

de Pecoulas PE, Tahar R, Ouatas T, Mazabraud A, Basco LK. Sequence variations in the Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene and their relationship with pyrimethamine resistance. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;92:265-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(97)00247-8 [ Links ]

Hastings MD, Porter KM, Maguire JD, Susanti I, Kania W, Bangs MJ, et al. Dihydrofolate reductase mutations in Plasmodium vivax from Indonesia and therapeutic response to sulfadoxine plus pyrimethamine. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:744-50. https://doi.org/10.1086/381397 [ Links ]

Hastings MD, Maguire JD, Bangs MJ, Zimmerman PA, Reeder JC, Baird JK, et al. Novel Plasmodium vivax dhfr alleles from the Indonesian Archipelago and Papua New Guinea: association with pyrimethamine resistance determined by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:733-40. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.2.733-740.2005 [ Links ]

Hupalo DN, Luo Z, Melnikov A, Sutton PL, Rogov P, Escalante A, et al. Population genomics studies identify signatures of global dispersal and drug resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Nat Genet. 2016;48:953-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3588 [ Links ]

Hawkins VN, Auliff A, Prajapati SK, Rungsihirunrat K, Hapuarachchi HC, Maestre A, et al. Multiple origins of resistance-conferring mutations in Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase. Malar J. 2008;7:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-72 [ Links ]

Saralamba N, Nakeesathit S, Mayxay M, Newton PN, Osorio L, Kim JR, et al. Geographic distribution of amino acid mutations in DHFR and DHPS in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Lao PDR, India and Colombia. Malar J. 2016;15:484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1543-8 [ Links ]

Winter DJ, Pacheco MA, Vallejo AF, Schwartz RS, Arevalo-Herrera M, Herrera S, et al. Whole genome sequencing of field isolates reveals extensive genetic diversity in Plasmodium vivax from Colombia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004252 [ Links ]

Cubides JR, Camargo-Ayala PA, Nino CH, Garzon-Ospina D, Ortega-Ortegon A, Ospina-Cantillo E, et al. Simultaneous detection of Plasmodium vivax dhfr, dhps, mdr1 and crt-o resistance-associated mutations in the Colombian Amazonian region. Malar J. 2018;17:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2286-5 [ Links ]

Chehuan YF, Costa MR, Costa JS, Alecrim MG, Nogueira F, Silveira H, et al. In vitro chloroquine resistance for Plasmodium vivax isolates from the Western Brazilian Amazon. Malar J. 2013;12:226. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-226 [ Links ]

Marques MM, Costa MR, Santana Filho FS, Vieira JL, Nascimento MT, Brasil LW, et al.Plasmodium vivax Chloroquine resistance and anemia in the Western Brazilian Amazon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:342-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02279-12 [ Links ]

Barnadas C, Musset L, Legrand E, Tichit M, Briolant S, Fusai T, et al. High prevalence and fixation of Plasmodium vivax dhfr/dhps mutations related to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine resistance in French Guiana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:19-22. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.81.19 [ Links ]

Mace KE, Arguin PM, Tan KR. Malaria surveillance - United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(7):1-28. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6707a1 [ Links ]

Rodrigues PT, Valdivia HO, de Oliveira TC, Alves JMP, Duarte A, Cerutti-Junior C, et al. Human migration and the spread of malaria parasites to the New World. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19554-0 [ Links ]

Secretaría de salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-032-SSA2-2014, para la vigilancia epidemiológica, prevención y control de las enfermedades transmitidas por vectores. Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud, 2014. [ Links ]

Pan American Health Organization. Situación de la malaria en la región de las Américas, 2000-2016. Washington DC: PAHO, 2016. [ Links ]

Gonzalez-Ceron L, Montoya A, Corzo-Gomez JC, Cerritos R, Santillan F, Sandoval MA. Genetic diversity and natural selection of Plasmodium vivax multi-drug resistant gene (pvmdr1) in Mesoamerica. Malar J. 2017;16:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1905-x [ Links ]

Gonzalez-Ceron L, Rodriguez MH, Sandoval MA, Santillan F, Galindo-Virgen S, Betanzos AF, et al. Effectiveness of combined chloroquine and primaquine treatment in 14 days versus intermittent single dose regimen, in an open, non-randomized, clinical trial, to eliminate Plasmodium vivax in southern Mexico. Malar J. 2015;14:426. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0938-2 [ Links ]

Gonzalez-Ceron L, Martinez-Barnetche J, Montero-Solis C, Santillan F, Soto AM, Rodriguez MH, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax in Latin America: polymorphism and evolutionary relationships of the circumsporozoite gene. Malar J. 2013;12:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-243 [ Links ]

Carlton JM, Adams JH, Silva JC, Bidwell SL, Lorenzi H, Caler E, et al. Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Nature. 2008;455:757-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07327 [ Links ]

Jovel IT, Mejia RE, Banegas E, Piedade R, Alger J, Fontecha G, et al. Drug resistance associated genetic polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax collected in Honduras, Central America. Malar J. 2011;10:376. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-376 [ Links ]

Sridaran S, Rodriguez B, Soto AM, Macedo De Oliveira A, Udhayakumar V. Molecular analysis of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance-associated alleles in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:840-5. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0214 [ Links ]

Lee WJ, Kim HH, Choi YK, Choi KM, Kim MA, Kim JY, et al. Analysis of the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene sequences in Plasmodium vivax field isolates that failed chloroquine treatment. Malar J. 2010;9:331. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-331 [ Links ]

Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Renia L, Letourneur F, Charlieu JP, Leartsakulpanich U, et al. Novel point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of Plasmodium vivax: evidence for sequential selection by drug pressure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1514-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.5.1514-1521.2003 [ Links ]

Samudio F, Santamaria AM, Obaldia N 3rd, Pascale JM, Bayard V, Calzada JE. Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum mutations associated with antimalarial drug resistance during an epidemic in Kuna Yala, Panama, Central America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:839-41. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.73.839 [ Links ]

Lu F, Lim CS, Nam DH, Kim K, Lin K, Kim TS, et al. Mutations in the antifolate-resistance-associated genes dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase in Plasmodium vivax isolates from malaria-endemic countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:474-9. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0004 [ Links ]

Sharifi-Sarasiabi K, Haghighi A, Kazemi B, Taghipour N, Mojarad EN, Gachkar L. Molecular surveillance of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum dhfr mutations in isolates form southern Iran. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201658016 [ Links ]

Das S, Banik A, Hati AK, Roy S. Low prevalence of dihydro folate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) quadruple and quintuple mutant alleles associated with SP resistance in Plasmodium vivax isolates of West Bengal, India. Malar J. 2016;15:395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1445-9 [ Links ]

Bareng AP, Espino FE, Chaijaroenkul W, Na-Bangchang K. Molecular monitoring of dihydrofolatereductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroatesynthetase (dhps) associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance inPlasmodium vivaxisolates of Palawan, Philippines. Acta Trop. 2018;180:81-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.01.006 [ Links ]

Asih PB, Marantina SS, Nababan R, Lobo NF, Rozi IE, Sumarto W, et al. Distribution of Plasmodium vivax pvdhfr and pvdhps alleles and their association with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment outcomes in Indonesia. Malar J. 2015;14:365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0903-0 [ Links ]

Huang B, Huang S, Su XZ, Tong X, Yan J, Li H, et al. Molecular surveillance of pvdhfr, pvdhps, and pvmdr-1 mutations in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Yunnan and Anhui provinces of China. Malar J. 2014;13:346. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-346 [ Links ]

Auliff A, Wilson DW, Russell B, Gao Q, Chen N, Anh le N, et al. Amino acid mutations in Plasmodium vivax DHFR and DHPS from several geographical regions and susceptibility to antifolate drugs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:617-21. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.617 [ Links ]

Urdaneta L, Plowe C, Goldman I, Lal AA. Point mutations in dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase genes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:457-62. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.457 [ Links ]

Peterson DS, Di Santi SM, Povoa M, Calvosa VS, Do Rosario VE, Wellems TE. Prevalence of the dihydrofolate reductase Asn-108 mutation as the basis for pyrimethamine-resistant falciparum malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;45:492-7. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1991.45.492 [ Links ]

Plowe CV, Cortese JF, Djimde A, Nwanyanwu OC, Watkins WM, Winstanley PA, et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase and epidemiologic patterns of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and resistance. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:1590-6. https://doi.org/10.1086/514159 [ Links ]

Cortese JF, Caraballo A, Contreras CE, Plowe CV. Origin and dissemination of Plasmodium falciparum drug-resistance mutations in South America. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:999-1006. https://doi.org/10.1086/342946 [ Links ]

Received: October 18, 2017; Accepted: April 11, 2018

Corresponding autor: Dra. Lilia González-Cerón. 4 avenida Norte y 19 Calle Poniente. 30740, Tapachula, Chiapas, México. Email: lgonzal@insp.mx

Declaración de conflicto de intereses. Los autores declararon no tener conflicto de intereses.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License