SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.60 número6Prevalencia y factores de riesgo para infección oral con virus de papiloma humano en hombres mexicanos con VIHEl efecto de un refuerzo de la vacuna tetravalente de VPH después de 51 meses: implicaciones para un esquema de vacunación extendido índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Salud Pública de México

versão impressa ISSN 0036-3634

Salud pública Méx vol.60 no.6 Cuernavaca Nov./Dez. 2018  Epub 22-Ago-2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/10182 

Original articles

HPV vaccine acceptance is high among adults in Mexico, particularly in people living with HIV

Aceptación de la vacuna contra VPH es alta entre adultos en México, especialmente en personas con VIH

Alejandra Jalil Portillo-Romero, MSc1 

Leith León-Maldonado, DPH2 

Betania Allen-Leigh, PhD3 

Brandon Brown, PhD4 

Carlos Magis, PhD5 

Norma Beatriz García-Fuentes, RN6 

Jorge Salmerón, DSc7  8 

Erika Hurtado, MSc8 

Leticia Torres-Ibarra, MSc8 

Berenice Rivera-Paredez, MSc7  8 

Rubí Hernández-López, MSc7  8 

Elsa Yunes-Díaz, MSc8 

Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce, DSc8 

1 Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Cuernavaca, Mexico.

2 Conacyt- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Mexico City, Mexico.

3 Dirección de Salud Reproductiva, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Mexico City, Mexico.

4 School of Medicine, University of California. Riverside, California, United States of America.

5 Atención Integral, Centro Nacional para la Prevención y Control del VIH/SIDA (Censida). Mexico City, Mexico.

6 Coordinación Estatal del Programa de VIH, SIDA e ITS, Servicios de Salud de Morelos. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

7 Centro de Investigación de Políticas de Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Mexico City, Mexico.

8 Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Mexico City, Mexico

Abstract:

Objective.

To measure HPV vaccine acceptance in diverse Mexican adult popula­tions, taking into account HIV status.

Materials and methods:

A total of 1 329 men and women, with and without HIV, participated in one of three intervention studies, offering HPV vaccination, carried out in the states of Morelos, Tlaxcala and Mexico City; either the bivalent (Morelos n=103, Tlaxcala n=127) or quadrivalent HPV-vaccine (Mexico City n=1 099) was offered.

Results:

HPV vaccine was accepted by 80.3% of participants; acceptance was higher in people living with HIV than those without (84.4 vs. 78%, p=0.004). Women had greater HPV infection knowledge (p<0.0001) than men and slightly higher (p=0.4) vaccine acceptance. The main reason for vaccine non-acceptance among HIV-positive participants was their doctor recommended they not get vaccinated.

Conclusion:

Acceptance of HPV-vaccine was high in men and women regardless of HIV status. Even higher rates of acceptability may be achieved by educating healthcare providers to recommend HPV vaccine to their patients.

Keywords: HPV vaccine; acceptability; people living with HIV; women; male

Resumen:

Objetivo.

Medir la aceptación de la vacuna de VPH en una muestra diversa de población adulta mexicana, teniendo en cuenta su estado de VIH.

Material y métodos:

1 329 hombres y mujeres con y sin VIH participaron en tres estudios de intervención, realizados en los estados de Morelos, Tlaxcala y Ciudad de México. Se ofreció la vacuna bivalente (Morelos n=103, Tlaxcala n=127) o la cuadrivalente (Ciudad de México n=1 099) contra VPH.

Resultados:

La vacuna fue aceptada por 80.3% de los participantes; la aceptación fue mayor en personas que viven con VIH que en aquéllas que no (84.4 vs. 78%, p=0.004). Las mujeres (p<0.0001) tenían mayor conocimientos sobre VPH que los hombres y una aceptación de la vacuna ligeramente mayor (p=0.4). El motivo principal de la no aceptación de la vacuna entre personas con VIH fue que su médico recomendó que no se vacunaran.

Conclusión:

La aceptación de la vacuna contra el VPH fue alta en hombres y mujeres, independientemente del estado de VIH. Se pueden lograr mayores tasas de aceptabilidad educando a los proveedores de atención médica para que recomienden la vacuna contra el VPH a sus pacientes.

Palabras clave: vacuna contra HPV; aceptabilidad; personas viviendo con VIH: hombres; mujeres

Introduction

HPV infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection among men and women worldwide.1,2 Persistent infection by oncogenic HPV types is associated with cervical, anal and oropharyngeal cancers and precancerous lesions.1,3 HPV 16/18 are responsible for 70% of invasive cervical cancer cases and 84.3% of anal cancer cases.4 HPV-related cancers constitute an important disease burden.5,6 In higher-income countries, for which there are more data available, HPV causes half of all cancers attributable to infection.2 High rates of cervical cancer in lower- and middle-income countries are due in part to the low quality screening and deficiencies in management of precancerous lesions; this is especially true when there is co-infection with HIV.7

Prevalence and incidence of HPV8 and occurrence of HPV-associate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) are high in people living with HIV, even with the introduction of antiretroviral therapy.8 The risk of HPV infection and therefore of developing related cancers is high in a variety of vulnerable groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM)9 and transgender women,10 as well as sexual abuse victims,11 and possibly rape victims, regardless of HIV status.

HPV vaccines are a strategic tool for efficient prevention of chronic HPV infection, genital warts12 and related cancers in adults.13 Research shows that efficacy of the HPV vaccine varies for preventing precancerous conditions including CIN 2-3, but in women with no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection, vaccine efficacy reaches 90%14 with up to 100% efficacy for prevention of HPV 6/11/16/18-related CIN3.15,16 In some studies, per protocol efficacy of preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 1-3 reaches 77.5%.17 Importantly, HPV vaccines can be used in people living with HIV/AIDS as well as those without HIV, given their high safety and immunogenicity profile.16,18,19,20,21,22,23 HPV vaccines have been approved in the US24 and Australia25 for women 9 to 45 and for men 9 to 26 years of age.

Studies show acceptability of the HPV vaccine in both men and women in higher-income countries is high, ranging from 66 to 86%.26,27,28,29,30,31,32 In low- and middle-income countries diverse groups, including parents of adolescents and MSM, have shown moderate to high HPV vaccine acceptability.33,34,35,36,37 Health education and vaccine promotion that is considered understandable, pertinent and that addresses rumors or incorrect information as well as social mobilization supporting HPV vaccine implementation are important factors related to HPV vaccine acceptability in low and middle-income countries.38,39,40,41 Worldwide, healthcare provider recommendation is one of the most important facilitators of HPV vaccine acceptability and uptake.42,43,44,45 Also important are healthcare user attitudes towards the HPV vaccine, including perceptions of vaccine efficacy46 and beliefs in the benefits of getting vaccinated.47 Studies on acceptability provide evidence on barriers and facilitators to vaccination in different populations that can be used to improve HPV vaccine policy development and implementation, such as designing vaccine promotion materials and providing healthcare providers with information about what they can say when having conversations with patients about the HPV vaccine.36 In the current analysis, our objective was to measure HPV vaccine acceptance in diverse Mexican adult populations, taking into account HIV status.

Materials and methods

This analysis is based on three intervention studies that focused on HPV vaccination and related issues in the states of Morelos, Tlaxcala and Mexico City, in Mexico. All three studies were approved by the Ethics, Biosecurity and Research committees of the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico; additional approval was obtained by the state Ministry of Health in Morelos and Tlaxcala, and by the Specialized Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinics in Mexico City. The study was presented to the healthcare providers from the clinics involved prior to recruitment, as was information about the effectiveness and safety of HPV vaccines for adults with and without HIV. Written informed consent was obtained for all participants in all states, including signatures by two witnesses.

Participants and data collection

In Morelos and Tlaxcala, healthcare users of the local Ambulatory Care Centers for Prevention and Treatment of AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections (CAPASITS, by its acronym in Spanish) were recruited. Men and women living with HIV age 18 to 45 were asked to complete paper questionnaires and were offered the bivalent HPV vaccine as part of a voluntary study (separate from their normal clinical care), in 2016. In Mexico City, men and women (including transgender women) 18 to 45 years old, including individuals with and without HIV, were recruited at the Specialized Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinic in 2018; they completed questionnaires using computer-assisted personal interviewing and were offered the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, also as part of a voluntary study that was not part of their clinical care. All questionnaires collected socio-demographic data (age, years of education, sex assigned at birth; table I). The questionnaires applied in Morelos and Tlaxcala also included items about HPV-related knowledge and attitudes (with yes/no answers; table II). The questionnaire applied in Mexico City did not collect data on HPV-related knowledge or attitudes but did ask about which gender the person currently identified with. After completing the questionnaires, study participants were provided with information about the association between HPV and cervical and anal cancer, information about HPV vaccine, and any questions they had were answered.

Table I Characteristics of men and women with and without HIV participating in HPV vaccine acceptability studies, Morelos*, Tlaxcala*, and Mexico City., Mexico, 2016 and 2018 

Characteristics

Total§

n = 1 329

Women#

n = 465 (35%)

Men

n = 864(65%)

P value&

Age (Mean ± SD)

Mean age Morelos

34.8±10.2

38.1±11.4

33.6±9.5

<0.0001

Mean age Tlaxcala

37.6±9.5

37.6±9.5

--

Mean age Mexico City

28.7±7.6

30.0±8.2

28.1±7.3

Place of residence n(%)

Tlaxcala

127 (9.5)

127 (27.3)

0

<0.0001

Morelos

103 (7.7)

28 (6.0)

75 (6.2)

Mexico City

1099 (82.6)

310 (66.7)

789 (65.9)

Education n (%)

Elementary school

139 (10.4)

92 (19.7)

47 (5.4)

<0.0001

Junior high school

198 (14.8)

116 (24.9)

82 (9.4)

High school

316 (23.7)

102 (21.9)

214 (24.7)

Undergraduate/college

496 (37.3)

114 (24.5)

382 (44.2)

Graduate studies

180 (13.5)

41 (8.8)

139 (16)

* Study participants in Morelos and Tlaxcala were healthcare users of Ambulatory Care Center for Prevention and Treatment of AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (CAPACITS, in Spanish: Centro Ambulatorio para la Prevención y Atención en SIDA e Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual)

Study participants in Mexico City were healthcare users of the Specialized Condesa and Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinics (Clínica Especializada Condesa y Clínica Especializada Condesa-Iztapalapa Dr. Jaime Sepúlveda Amor)

§ The total sample was made up of 1 329 men and women, including 103 men and women living with HIV in Morelos and 127 women living with HIV in Tlaxcala, and 1 099 people in Mexico City (789 men and 310 women of whom 108 were transgender women, and of those in Mexico City in all 275 were people living with HIV and 824 without)

# Women: 202 cisgender (non transgender) women and 108 transgender women

& For comparisons, we used t-test for age and Chi square test for categorical variable

SD= Standard deviation

Table II HPV knowledge and attitudes among men and women living with HIV in Morelos and Tlaxcala States. Mexico, 2016 

Item

Total

n=230

Women

n=155 (67.4 %)

Men

n=75 (32.6 %)

P*

Do you think that HPV can be transmitted from one person to another through sexual contact? n (%)

No

Yes

18(7.89)

210(92.11)

9(5.88)

144(94.12)

9(12)

66(88)

0.1

Do you think HPV can cause cervical or anal cancer? n (%)

No

Yes

36(15.79)

192(84.21)

14(9.15)

139(90.85)

22(29.33)

53(70.67)

<0.0001

Do you think that HPV can disappear on its own, without treatment? n (%)

No

Yes

180(79.3)

47(20.7)

108(71.05)

44(28.95)

72(96)

3(4)

<0.0001

Compared with other people, do you think your risk of getting HPV is greater? n (%)

No

Yes

94(41.23)

134(58.77)

34(22.22)

119(77.78)

60(80)

15(20)

<0.0001

Do you know whether there is a vaccine that prevents HPV infections that are associated with cancer? n (%)

No

Yes

37(16.23)

191(83.77)

13(8.5)

140(91.5)

24(32)

51(68)

<0.0001

Do you think the HPV vaccine can be applied to men and women? n (%)

No

Yes

80(35.09)

148(64.91)

44(28.76)

109(71.24)

36(48)

39(52)

<0.0001

* For comparisons, we used Chi square test for categorical variables.

Analysis

The survey data were entered (single data entry for paper questionnaires) into an excel worksheet or transferred from the file created by the computer-assisted personal interviewing program and analyzed using STATA v.13 statistical software. We used t-test for age and Chi square test for categorical variables. Descriptive statistics were used to examine age, education, gender and HPV knowledge and attitudes. HPV vaccine acceptability was defined as receiving the first dose of the vaccine. Comparisons were done using Chi square test for categorical variables, to assess variable association with vaccine reception and refusal.

Results

In all, 1 329 men and women were included in this analysis, with 103 men and women living with HIV in Morelos, 127 women living with HIV in Tlaxcala, and 1 099 people (789 men and 310 women, including 108 transgender women, of whom in all 275 were people living with HIV and 824 without), at the Condesa and Condesa-Iztapalapa clinics (table I). Of the total sample, 65% were men and 35% women, with older average ages in Morelos and Tlaxcala and younger average age for participants from Mexico City. More women had only an elementary or junior high school education as compared to men, and more men had at least some college education, or graduate studies than women. All these differences are statistically significant.

For most questions on HPV-related knowledge, correct responses ranged from 65 to 92% (table II). Among the respondents who were asked questions about HPV-related knowledge (all of whom were people living with HIV), there were relatively high levels of knowledge about HPV being sexually transmitted, that HPV causes anal and cervical cancer and that an anti-HPV vaccine exists with somewhat fewer people reporting that the HPV vaccine can be applied to both men and women and only a fifth of participants (mostly women) knowing HPV can disappear without treatment. Women living with HIV had greater knowledge in all areas than men living with HIV, and also had much higher risk perception about acquiring HPV (78% for women versus 20% for men). All these differences were statistically significant (table II).

Vaccine acceptance (agreeing to -including providing signed, informed consent- and getting the application of the first dose of the HPV vaccine) was 80.3% in the total sample (table III). Acceptance was 96.8% in women from Tlaxcala (the sample included only women living with HIV), 84.5% in people from Morelos (including men and women living with HIV), and 78% in Mexico City (including men and women with and without HIV). These differences were statistically significant. Acceptance of the vaccine was slightly higher in women compared to men (81.5 and 80% respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant). Similar proportions of cisgender* and transgender women living in Mexico City accepted the HPV vaccine (data not shown). More people living with HIV accepted the vaccine as compared to those without HIV (84.4 vs. 78.0%) and this difference was statistically significant. Among study participants living with HIV and receiving treatment at CAPASITS in Morelos and Tlaxcala, those who decided not to receive the vaccine gave as their principal reason for doing so that their physician recommended they not get vaccinated (data not shown).

Table III HPV vaccine acceptance among men and women with and without HIV participating in HPV vaccine acceptability studies, Morelos,* Tlaxcala,* and Mexico City. Mexico, 2016 and 2018 

Characteristics

Accepted the first dose of the HPV vaccine

n=1 067 (80.3%)

Did not accept the first dose of the HPV vaccine

n=262 (19.7%)

P§

Place of residence

Tlaxcala

122 (96.8)

5 (3.2)

<0.0001

Morelos

87 (84.5)

16 (15.5)

Mexico City

858 (78.0)

241 (22)

Gender#

Women

379 (81.5)

86 (18.5)

0.4

Men

688 (79.6)

176 (20.3)

Living with HIV&

Not living with HIV

641 (77.7)

183 (22.2)

0.004

   Living with HIV

426 (84.3)

79 (15.6)

* Study participants in Morelos and Tlaxcala were healthcare users of Ambulatory Care Center for Prevention and Treatment of AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (CAPACITS, in Spanish: Centro Ambulatorio para la Prevención y Atención en SIDA e Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual)

Study participants in Mexico City were healthcare users of the Specialized Condesa and Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinics (Clínica Especializada Condesa y Clínica Especializada Condesa-Iztapalapa Dr. Jaime Sepúlveda Amor)

§ For comparisons, we used Chi square test for categorical variables

# Gender: Since we included transgender women (n=108) in the sample (under women), this category refers to gender and not sex

& Study participants living with HIV or those without HIV were distributed as follows: Tlaxcala: 127 people living with HIV; Morelos: 103 people living with HIV; Mexico City: 275 people living with HIV and 824 people without HIV

Discussion

Among adult residents of three states in Mexico, acceptance of the HPV vaccine in general is high, without significant differences due to sex/gender (between cisgender men and women or between cisgender women and transgender women) or HIV status. In the study populations included in this analysis, a high level of acceptance of the HPV vaccine was observed among people living with HIV, as has been found in other studies.28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 A number of studies have also found that high HPV vaccine acceptability in men who have sex with men (with or without HIV) was 75%.33,46 As for women, in a cohort of young female sex workers living with HIV, 100% agreed to apply the first dose of vaccine, while 79% completed the 3-dose schedule.48 Our results therefore suggest that it would be feasible to introduce a vaccination program against HPV between adults in Mexico, including among people living with HIV, who are at high-risk of developing HPV-associated cancers.2,8

Women and men living with HIV are disproportionately affected by HPV infection and associated diseases.49,50 In their vaccination recommendations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have proposed the introduction of the HPV vaccine for people living with HIV, irrespective of the CD4 lymphocyte count.51 In Mexico, the National Center for the Prevention and Control of HIV and AIDS (Censida, by its acronym in Spanish) is studying the possibility of universal introduction of vaccination against HPV in people living with HIV. In order to make this public policy decision, it is essential to consider acceptability of the vaccine among healthcare users,29,34,35,38,39,48 logistical aspects of vaccine implementation42,52,53,54 as well as the need for providing current, accurate information to healthcare professionals about the safety and efficacy of HPV vaccination among adults in general and specifically those living with HIV.55,56,57,58 Although our findings must be interpreted with care given the cross-sectional design, they indicate, as other studies have shown, that healthcare provider recommendation is an extremely important factor for encouraging HPV vaccination among people living with or without HIV.45,53,55,56 This is especially important if healthcare providers are to support such public policies by recommending the HPV vaccine to their patients.45,53,55,56

Knowledge about HPV was high; in our study, 84% of participants knew that HPV can cause cancer, which compares favorably to another study of women living with HIV where only 50% knew about this association.59 The Mexican men in this study also had more knowledge than that observed in others, such a study of heterosexual, gay and bisexual men, which found that among those who had heard of HPV, less than a third correctly responded that HPV can cause oral, anal and penile cancers.34 In addition, knowledge about HPV was higher among women than men, even though women had significantly lower levels of formal education. This seems to indicate that women have acquired their knowledge about HPV through interaction with healthcare providers, in spite of a lack of formal education. These findings support the need for providing healthcare personnel with the resources they need in order to promote HPV knowledge and especially to recommend HPV vaccination among their patients.53,54,55,56

A limitation of this analysis is that given that data on knowledge and attitudes regarding vaccination against HPV were not collected among participants from Mexico City, the analysis cannot provide a complete view on the relationship between these aspects and the acceptance of the first dose of HPV vaccine, even for this study population. Also, information was not collected from healthcare users about whether their healthcare providers recommended they get the HPV vaccine, nor was data collected from the healthcare providers themselves. Data are only available for the application of the first dose of vaccine but not for subsequent doses, although more than one vaccine dose was applied in some of the study locations. In addition, the results of this study are not generalizable because they are based on non-representative samples.

Acceptance of the HPV vaccine was high among adult men and women in Mexico with and without HIV. Even higher rates of acceptability can most likely be achieved by providing healthcare workers with a variety of resources so they can be proficient at recommending the HPV vaccine to their adult patients irrespective of HIV status. Healthcare personnel should be provided with educational experiences that support them in developing greater knowledge, self-efficacy and readiness for change in relation to recommending HPV vaccination as well as specific resources for providing patient counseling and education about HPV vaccination.58,59

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants who made this possible, and also the healthcare and research personnel at the Cuernavaca and Tlaxcala CAPASITS and the Condesa and Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinics. The study at the CAPASITS was carried out thanks to funding provided by Censida, Mexico’s National AIDS Prevention and Control Program. The study at the Condesa and Condesa-Iztapalapa Clinics was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación; Seciti) of Mexico City under the grant SECITI/094/2017, as part of the project, “Prevention and control of HPV-related neoplasia in high risk groups in Mexico City: An intervention with a social dimension”.

References

1. Burchell AN, Winer RL, de Sanjosé S, Franco EL. Chapter 6: Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of genital HPV infection. Vaccine. 2006;24(suppl 3):S3/52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.031 [ Links ]

2. Giuliano AR, Lazcano-Ponce E, Villa LL, Flores R, Salmeron J, Lee JH, et al. The human papillomavirus infection in men study: human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution among men residing in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(8):2036-43. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0151 [ Links ]

3. Barroso LF 2nd. The role of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination in the prevention of anal cancer in individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) infection. Ther Adv Vaccines. 2013;1(2):81-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051013613496946 [ Links ]

4. De Vuyst H, Clifford GM, Nascimento MC, Madeleine MM, Franceschi S. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(7):1626-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24116 [ Links ]

5. Gomez-Dantés H, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Silverman-Retana O, Montero P, González-Robledo MC, et al. The burden of cancer in Mexico, 1990-2013. Salud Publica Mex. 2016;58(2):118-31. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7780 [ Links ]

6. Bray F, Piñeros M. Cancer patterns, trends and projections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A global context. Salud Publica Mex . 2016;58(2):104-17. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7779 [ Links ]

7. Plummer M, de Martel C, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Franceschi S. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e609-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30143-7 [ Links ]

8. Palefsky J. Human papillomavirus-related disease in people with HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4(1):52-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e32831a7246 [ Links ]

9. Combes JD, Clifford GM, Egger M, Cavassini M, Hirsch HH, Hauser C, et al. Human papillomavirus antibody response following HAART initiation among MSM. AIDS. 2017;31(4):561-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001354 [ Links ]

10. Loverro G, Di Naro E, Caringella AM, De Robertis AL, Loconsole D, Chironna M. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in a clinic sample of transsexuals in Italy. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92(1):67-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051987 [ Links ]

11. Garland SM, Subasinghe AK, Jayasinghe YL, Wark JD, Moscicki AB, Singer A, et al. HPV vaccination for victims of childhood sexual abuse. Lancet. 2015;386(10007):1919-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00757-6 [ Links ]

12. Tejada RA, Vargas KG, Benites-Zapata V, Mezones-Holguín E, Bolaños-Díaz R, Hernandez AV. Human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy in the prevention of anogenital warts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Salud Publica Mex . 2017;59(1):84-94 . https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HCMDYJ [ Links ]

13. Torres-Ibarra L, Lazcano-Ponce E, Franco EL, Cuzick J, Hernández-Ávila M, Lorincz A, et al. Triage strategies in cervical cancer detection in Mexico: Methods of the FRIDA study. Salud Publica Mex . 2016;58(2):197-210. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7789 [ Links ]

14. Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Wheeler CM, Jaisamrarn U, Garland SM, Castellsagué X, et al. Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70286-8 [ Links ]

15. FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(19):1915-27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061741 [ Links ]

16. Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernández-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, et al. A pooled analysis of continued prophylactic efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (Types 6/11/16/18) vaccine against high-grade cervical and external genital lesions. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009;2(10):868-78. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0031 [ Links ]

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations on the use of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in males--Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(50):1705-8. [ Links ]

18. Schwarz TF, Galaj A, Spaczynski M, Wysocki J, Kaufmann AM, Poncelet S, et al. Ten-year immune persistence and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in females vaccinated at 15-55 years of age. Cancer Med. 2017;6(11):2723-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1155 [ Links ]

19. Hidalgo-Tenorio C, Ramírez-Taboada J, Gil-Anguita C, Esquivias J, Omar-Mohamed-Balgahata M, SamPedro A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine in HIV-positive Spanish men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Res Ther. 2017;14:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-017-0160-0 [ Links ]

20. Zhu FC, Hu SY, Hong Y, Hu YM, Zhang X, Zhang YJ, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in Chinese women aged 18-25 years: event-triggered analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med . 2017;6(1):12-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.869 [ Links ]

21. Money DM, Moses E, Blitz S, Vandriel SM, Lipsky N, Walmsley SL, et al. HIV viral suppression results in higher antibody responses in HIV-positive women vaccinated with the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. Vaccine . 2016;34(40):4799-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.016 [ Links ]

22. Wheeler CM, Skinner SR, Del Rosario-Raymundo MR, Garland SM, Chatterjee A, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women older than 25 years: 7-year follow-up of the phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled VIVIANE study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(10):1154-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30120-7 [ Links ]

23. Palefsky JM, Gillison ML, Strickler HD. Chapter 16. HPV vaccines in immunocompromised women and men. Vaccine . 2006;24(suppl 3):S140-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.120 [ Links ]

24. U.s. Food & Drug Administation. Gardasil. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm094042.htm https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccine s/Vaccine s/ApprovedProducts/ucm094042.htmLinks ]

25. Mazza D, Petrovic K, Grech C, Harris N. HPV vaccination in women aged 27 to 45 years: what do general practitioners think? BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-91 [ Links ]

26. Donders GG, Gabrovska M, Bellen G, Van KJ, Van Den BT, Riphagen I, et al. Knowledge of cervix cancer, human papilloma virus (HPV) and HPV vaccination at the moment of introduction of the vaccine in women in Belgium. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008; 277:291-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0487-1 [ Links ]

27. Gerend MA, Barley J. Human papillomavirus vaccine acceptability among young adult men. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:58-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31818606fc [ Links ]

28. Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Jin Y, Huang B, Namakydoust A, Zimet GD. Rates of human papillomavirus vaccination, attitudes about vaccination, and human papillomavirus prevalence in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1103-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817051fa [ Links ]

29. Marshall H, Ryan P, Roberton D, Baghurst P. A cross-sectional survey to assess community attitudes to introduction of Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Aust NZJ Public Health. 2007;31:325-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2007.00054.x [ Links ]

30. Woodhall SC, Lehtinen M, Verho T, Huhtala H, Hokkanen M, Kosunen E. Anticipated acceptance of HPV vaccination at the baseline of implementation: A survey of parental and adolescent knowledge and attitudes in Finland. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40:466-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.01.005 [ Links ]

31. Friedman AL, Shepeard H. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of the general public regarding HPV: findings from CDC focus group research and implications for practice. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(3):471-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106292022 [ Links ]

32. Sauvageau C, Duval B, Gilca V, Lavoie F, Ouakki M. Human papilloma virus vaccine and cervical cancer screening acceptability among adults in Quebec, Canada. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:304. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-304 [ Links ]

33. Tian T, Wang D, Papamichael C, Yan Z, Guoyao S, Zhanlin Z, et al. HPV vaccination acceptability among men who have sex with men in Urumqi, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1520591 [ Links ]

34. Poole DN, Tracy JK, Levitz L, Rochas M, Sangare K, Yekta S, et al. A cross-sectional study to assess HPV knowledge and HPV vaccine acceptability in Mali. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056402 [ Links ]

35. Godoy-Verdugo MK, Zonana-Nacach A, Anzaldo-Campos MC. Aceptación de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano por parte de madres de hijas entre 9 y 13 años de edad. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013;81(11):645-51. [ Links ]

36. Gamaoun R. Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of anti-HPV vaccine in the Arab states of the Middle East and North Africa Region: a systematic review. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(6):538-48. https://doi.org/10.26719/2018.24.6.538 [ Links ]

37. Cunningham MS, Davison C, Aronson KJ. HPV vaccine acceptability in Africa: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2014;69:274-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.035 [ Links ]

38. Degarege A, Krupp K, Fennie K, Srinivas V, Li T, Stephens DP, et al. Human Papillomavirus Vaccine acceptability among parents of adolescent girls in a rural area, Mysore, India. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018. 31(6):583-91. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.008 [ Links ]

39. Vermandere H, van Stam MA, Naanyu V, Michielsen K, Degomme O, Oort F. Uptake of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Kenya: testing the health belief model through pathway modeling on cohort data. Global Health. 2016;12(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0211-7 [ Links ]

40. Kabakama S, Gallagher KE, Howard N, Mounier-Jack S, Burchett HE, Griffiths UK, et al. Social mobilization, consent and acceptability: a review of human papillomavirus vaccination procedures in low and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health . 2016;16(1):834. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3517-8 [ Links ]

41. Lazcano-Ponce E, Rivera L, Arillo-Santillán E, Salmerón J, Hernández-Avila M, Muñoz N. Acceptability of a human papillomavirus (HPV) trial vaccine among mothers of adolescents in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Arch Med Res. 2001;32(3):243-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0188-4409(01)00277-6 [ Links ]

42. Perez S, Zimet GD, Tatar O, Stupiansky NW, Fisher WA, Rosberger Z. Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: Successes and Future Challenges. Drugs. 2018;78(14):1385-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0975-6 [ Links ]

43. Fenton AT, Eun TJ, Clark JA, Perkins RB. Indicated or elective? The association of providers’ words with HPV vaccine receipt. Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2018;14(10):2503-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1480237 [ Links ]

44. Rosenthal SL, Weiss TW, Zimet GD, Ma L, Good MB, Vichnin MD. Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19-26: importance of a physician’s recommendation. Vaccine . 2011;29(5):890-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.063 [ Links ]

45. Attia AC, Wolf J, Núñez AE. On surmounting the barriers to HPV vaccination: we can do better. Ann Med. 2018;50(3):209-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2018.1426875 [ Links ]

46. Sadlier C, Lynam A, O’Dea S, Delamere S, Quinlan M, Clarke S, et al. HPV vaccine acceptability in HIV-infected and HIV negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ireland. Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2016;12(6):1536-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1151588 [ Links ]

47. Wheldon CW, Daley EM, Walsh-Buhi ER, Baldwin JA, Nyitray AG, Giuliano AR. An integrative theoretical framework for HPV Vaccine promotion among male sexual minorities. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1409-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316652937 [ Links ]

48. Wadhera P, Evans JL, Stein E, Gandhi M, Couture MC, Sansothy N, et al. HPV knowledge, vaccine acceptance, and vaccine series completion among female entertainment and sex workers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: the Young Women’s Health Study. Int J STD AIDS . 2015;26(12):893-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414563626 [ Links ]

49. Chin-Hong PV, Palefsky JM. Natural history and clinical management of anal human papillomavirus disease in men and women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infec Dis. 2002;35(9):1127-34. https://doi.org/10.1086/344057 [ Links ]

50. Sun XW, Kuhn L, Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, Wright TC Jr. Human papillomavirus infection in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. New Engl J Med. 1997;337(19):1343-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711063371903 [ Links ]

51. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Chesson HW, Curtis CR, Gee J, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-05):1-30. [ Links ]

52. Gilca V, Salmerón-Castro J, Sauvageau C, Ogilvie G, Landry M, Naus M, Lazcano-Ponce E. Early use of the HPV 2-dose vaccination schedule: Leveraging evidence to support policy for accelerated impact. Vaccine . 2018;36(32 Pt A):4800-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.004 [ Links ]

53. Wallace L, Kapirir L. How are new vaccines prioritized in low-income countries? A case study of human papilloma virus vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Uganda. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(12):707-20. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.37 [ Links ]

54. Patel H, Wilson E, Vizzotti C, Parston G, Prestt J, Darzi A. Argentina’s successful implementation of a national human papillomavirus vaccination program. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(2):301-8. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1416 [ Links ]

55. Wheldon CW, Sutton SK, Fontenot HB, Quinn GP, Giuliano AR, Vadaparampil ST. Physician communication practices as a barrier to risk-based HPV Vaccine uptake among men who have sex with men. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(5):1126-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1223-6 [ Links ]

56. Crann SE, Barata PC, Mitchell R, Mawhinney L, Thistle P, Chirenje ZM, Stewart DE. Healthcare providers’ perspectives on the acceptability and uptake of HPV vaccines in Zimbabwe. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;37(4):147-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1199544 [ Links ]

57. Garbutt JM, Dodd S, Walling E, Lee AA, Kulka K, Lobb R. Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0750-5 [ Links ]

58. Malo TL, Hall ME, Brewer NT, Lathren CR, Gilkey MB. Why is announcement training more effective than conversation training for introducing HPV vaccination? A theory-based investigation. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0743-8 [ Links ]

59. Wigfall LT, Bynum SA, Brandt HM, Hébert JR. HPV vaccine awareness and knowledge among women living with HIV. J Cancer Educ . 2016;31(1):187-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0943-8 [ Links ]

* Cisgender is a term used to refer to people whose gender identity and the gender assigned at birth agree (people who were labeled as female at birth and identify as women or who were labeled as male at birth and identify as men). That is, people who are not transgender.

Received: November 12, 2018; Accepted: November 23, 2018

*Corresponding author: Dr. Betania Allen-Leigh. Dirección de Salud Reproductiva, Centro en Investigación de Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. 7ª cerrada de Fray de Pedro de Gante 50 col. Sección XVI. 14000 Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: ballen@insp.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License