SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.60 issue4Malnutrition and program coverage, a pilot study in indigenous Tenek children in Tocoy, MexicoWhat is Mapuche's küme mogen? Concept and implications in public and community health author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Salud Pública de México

Print version ISSN 0036-3634

Salud pública Méx vol.60 n.4 Cuernavaca Jul./Aug. 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/9040 

Carta al editor

Feasibility study of a cell phone intervention to promote mental health among deported mexican migrants

Estudio de factibilidad de una intervención sobre telefonía móvil para promover la salud mental entre migrantes mexicanos deportados

Ietza Bojorquez, PhD1  * 

Rosa María Aguilera-Guzmán, MSc2 

Adrián Aguilera, PhD3 

Silvia Mejía-Arango, PhD1 

1 Departamento de Estudios Poblacionales, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte. Tijuana, Baja California, México.

2 Departamento de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. Ciudad de México, México.

3 School of Social Welfare, University of California. Berkeley, California, USA.

Dear editor: Deported migrants experience mental health problems,1 and mobility and returning to places with limited services complicate their access to care. Mobile technologies can be useful in this context.2

We conducted a feasibility study3 of a cell phone-administered intervention to promote mental health in deportees. We recruited participants (n=50) in Tijuana, Mexico, from 2015 to 2016, at the point of deportation and in shelters. Eligibility criteria were: 1) <=24 hrs deported; 2) >=3 years in the US; 3) age 20-65 years; 4) Mexico-born; 5) Spanish speaker. Participants received a phone, answered a baseline questionnaire, and were called at 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days. During the calls, participants with depressive symptoms received a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based intervention: 1) accepting negative emotions; 2) reflecting on thought patterns accompanying emotions; 3) inventorying resources and making an action plan; 4) relaxation exercise. The caller asked about experience with the intervention (or the phone call). After each follow-up, ≈US$11 were added to phone credit, and there were raffles of gift cards (≈US$28). Our main feasibility outcome was 90-day retention, and we evaluated acceptability and barriers with qualitative data from the calls.

Recruitment rate was 13.3% (50/377) (figure 1). Participation rate was 37.3% (50/134). As per design, 20% of participants were female. Mean age was 35.3 years, average education 8.4 years, and average time in the US 7.3 years. Eighteen percent had a previous diagnosis of depression, and 50.0% had depressive symptoms at baseline. The 90-day retention rate was 42% (21/50). Of the participants, 13/50 (26.0%) responded to five calls, 12/50 (24.0%) to four, 4/50 (8.0%) to three, 2/50 (4.0%) to two, 6/50 (12.0%) to one, and 13/50 (26.0%) to none.

Figure 1 Flow of participants in the study. Tijuana, Mexico. September 2015 to February 2016 

Participants said the calls made them feel “like someone cared” and “optimistic.” Those in rural areas had problems with phone reception. Noise and audition problems were also mentioned. A participant who was back in the US said the phone functioned only when close to the international border. Two mentioned that they had felt unsafe when approached by the researchers, but felt more confident with subsequent calls. The relaxation exercise was not implemented, as conditions (people around, noise) were inadequate.

That 50% of participants responded to four to five calls in the midst of moving between states and countries shows that their experience was positive. A future evaluation study is feasible provided that other means of communication are added (to solve the problem of phone reception), and participation rates might increase if conducted in collaboration with the migrant shelters or Mexican personnel at the deportation points, so that potential participants feel safer.

References

1. Bojorquez I, Aguilera RM, Ramirez J, Cerecero D, Mejia S. Common Mental Disorders at the Time of Deportation: A Survey at the Mexico-United States Border. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;17(6):1732-1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0083-y [ Links ]

2. Burda C, Haack M, Duarte AC, Alemi F. Medication adherence among homeless patients: a pilot study of cell phone effectiveness. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012;24(11):675-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00756.x [ Links ]

3. Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. The Distinctive Features of a Feasibility Study: Objectives and Guiding Questions. OTJR. 2015;35(3):169-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215578649 [ Links ]

*Corresponding author: E-mail: ietzabojorquez@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License