SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.68 número6Quasi-point versus point nodes in Sr2RuO4, the case of a flat tight binding γ sheet índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.68 no.6 México nov./dic. 2022  Epub 31-Jul-2023

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.68.060401 

Research

Atomic and Molecular Physics

Description of nuclear properties for 114-128Cd isotopes

A. Mohammed Alia 

R. B. Alkhayata 

M. M. Yousifa 

M. Abed Al-Jubboria 

H. H. Kassimb 

F. I. Sharradb  c 

a Department of Physics, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Mosul, 41001 Mosul, Iraq.

b Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

c College of Health and Medical Technology, University of AlKafeel, Iraq.


Abstract

In this paper, the energy levels of the ground-state band (GSB) and other states for 114-128Cd isotopes have been determined using the Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1) with a New Empirical Equation (NEE). The GSB results showed that the IBM-1, NEE, and available experimental data were all in fairly consistent. The NEE and IBM-1 calculations for the high states above 6+ state are slightly overestimated compared to the experimental data, with the exception of the 114Cd and 118Cd nuclei. Furthermore, the reduced transition probabilities B(E2) extracted from the IBM-1 model agree well with the available experimental data. The potential energy surface (EPS) was also examined with the IBM-1. The EPS contour results for Cd isotopes demonstrate that the Cd isotopes under investigation represent a smooth transition behavior from light Cd nuclei toward a more collective vibrational mode as the neutron number increases.

Keywords: IBM-1; energy level; potential energy; cadmium isotopes; NEE

1. Introduction

The Cd isotopes are of specific interest since they have only two fewer protons than the individual closed-shell Sn nuclei. The large abundance of stable isotopes in combination with the interesting properties of the closed proton shell near Z=50 and the presence of neutrons in the middle of the N=50-82 shell make the Z=50 region favored for nuclear structure studies [1-4]. Schraff-Goldhaber and Wesener observed that The Cd isotopes have low lying states that reflect the quadrupole-vibrational excitations of a spherical-equilibrium surface [5]. lachello and Arima [6] successfully described the collective nuclear properties in intermediate- mass nuclei using the Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1). Moreover, the IBM-1 model generated the U(6) group algebra, that then produces three subgroup symmetries: U(5), SU(3), and O(6). These three dynamics are associated with a vibrational, rotational, and 7-soft nuclei, respectively [2,3]. However, many researchers have suggested that nuclei may have an intermediate structure consisting of the transitions U(5)-SU(3), U(5)-O(6), and SU(3)-O(6) [4,5].

Great deal of research on the structure of electromagnetic transitions and energy levels in even-even Cd isotopes have been carried out [6-12]. The stable isotopes of 110,112Cd have already been explained as collective nuclei with multiphonon excitations. Morrison and Smith [13] presented four distinct constant boson interactions in order to illustrate the framework of 108,116Cd isotopes for states with angular momentum (L=1 to 6). Pignanelli et al. [14] used the interacting boson model to study the octupole excitations in nuclei with masses between 98 and 150. The low-spin state in even-even 106-112,116Cd isotopes was examined utilizing γ-ray (in/off-beam) and conversion-electron spectroscopy [15]. Long et al. [7] used IBM-1 to explain the low-lying levels and high-spin states of 116,118,120 Cd. The same procedure was also carried out by Bollaert et al. [16]. Moreover, Kadi et al. [17] used the (n,n', γ) reaction to investigate the lifetimes of various levels as well as the decay parameters of multiphonon quadrupole vibrational states and invasion structures in 116Cd. They found that the intruder pattern is fully confirmed in the 116Cd nuclei. likewise, Gade et al. [18] evaluated the electric and magnetic dipole excitations of 108Cd nuclei and estimated the lifetimes of eight dipoles. Furthermore, the researchers demonstrated a transition path between the dynamic U(5) and O(6) limits for the 108Cd using the IBM-2 framework. Garrett et al. [19] used the interaction boson model to analyze the systematic variation of 110-114Cd isotopes. Their calculations show that Cd isotopes at the two-photon levels reflect the data quite well, while the calculations for the 0+ states in 116Cd fail completely. Systematic variations occur across the Cd isotopic chain at the three-phonon level, demonstrating the breakdown of vibrational motion in low-spin states. Hossian et al. [20] used IBM-1 to study the energy level of 104-122Cd nuclides. They noted that Cd isotopes have a vibrational symmetry U(5). The resulting Hamiltonian was utilized by Nomura etal. [21] to calculate the low-lying excitation bands, quadrupole and monopole electrical transition rates for the even-even 108-116Cd. Many intruder states were predicted, which corresponded to empirical data. Besides, Leviatan et al. [22] show that vibrational symmetry is retained in a part of the 110Cd spectrum and destroyed in certain nonyrast states. In addition, the vibration in the bulk of the low-lying normal states is reportedly preserved. Besides the IBM-1, Harris [23] and Mariscotti et al. [24] for example, used a framework in which higher-order nuclear angular velocity terms in the cranking model were preserved as well as the moment of inertia was extended to excited bands with two variables (go and C). Raduta et al. [25] de-quantized a second-order quadrupole boson using a time-dependent variation principle. They applied the coherent state model technique on nuclei, and used the least squares method to calculate the implicated parameters. This paper aims to use the interacting boson model (IBM-1) with a new empirical equation (NEE) to calculate the ground and other states for even-even 114-128Cd isotopes. The EPS contour was examined for Cd nuclei. In addition, the reduced transition probabilities B(E2) are determined and compared to experimental data.

2. Calculation procedure

For nuclei containing N nucleons, the Interacting Boson Model (IBM) assigns the occupancy to a truncated model space. It provides a quantitative interpretation of indistinguishable particles with angular momentum equal to either 0 or 2 forming pairs. In IBM-1, the Hamiltonian is written as [6,26]

H=εsss~+εddd~+L=0,2,4122L+11/2CLd×d×d~×d~0+1212d×d2×d~×s~2+d×s2)×d~×d~20+12v0d×d0)×s~×s~0+s×s0)×d~×d~00+12u0s×s0)×s~×s~0+u2d×s2)×d~×s~2(0). (1)

The IBM-1 Hamiltonian can be described in nine terms, two of which appear in one-body terms (s and d). The εs and εd denote the energy of bosons, while the rest are two-body terms (C0, C 1, C 4, v 0,v 2 ,u 0,u 2). The number of bosons Nb, on the other hand, is conserved. In general, the IBM-1 Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) can also be expressed as [28]

H^=εn^d+a0P^P^+a1L^L^+a2Q^Q^+a3T^3T^3+a4P^4T^4, (2)

where ε = εd - εs is the boson energy, and the operators are defined as follows:

n^d=dd~,P^=12d~d~-s~s~,L^=10d×d(1),Q^=d×s~+s×d~+χd×d~(2),T^r=d×d~(r). (3)

Total number of d-bosons, pairing, angular momentum, and quadrupole are represented by the operators n^d,P^,L^,Q^ respectively. The T^r operator represents to octupole and hexadecapole as r = 3 and 4, respectively, and H refers to the quadrupole structure parameter. The strength parameters a0, a1, a2, a3,and a4 are used to describe the interactions between the bosons. The operator d~ is equal to -1md-m Interaction parameters for the PHINT program are specified: ε = EPS, a0 = 2 PAIR, a1 = ELL/2, a2 = QQ/2, a3 = 5 OCT, a4 + 5 HEX, and CHI=0.

The IBM-1 performs three types of dynamic symmetry for nuclei: vibrational U(5), rotational SU(3) and γ-soft O(6), with their eigenvalues given by [28].

E=εnd+βndnd+4+2γvv+3+2δLL+1U5,E=a22λ2+μ2+λμ+3λ+μ+a1-3a28LL+1SU3,E=a24N-σN+σ+4+a32ττ+3+a1-a310LL+1O6, (4)

hence, the energy ε, pairing a0, and quadrupole a2 parameters are influence in the U(5), O(6), and SU(3) limits, respectively. Several nuclei have a property that allows them to transition between two or three of the above-mentioned limits. The new empirical equation (NEE) [29] was used in this study to calculate the energy levels of Cd isotopes. The energy levels of the GSB are determined depending only on the angular momentum (I) as follows:

EI=A1I(I+1)A2I+1+IA3. (5)

This formula has three parameters, A1, A2 and A3. These parameters were obtained after fitting all of the positive experimental (GSB) data. Further to that, the following formula can be used to compute the other bands [29]

EI=E0+A1+BI(I+1)A2I+1+IA3. (6)

In addition, the E0 (I=0) and B can be estimated from the γ-and β-bands.

3. Results and discussion

The results for the energy levels of the ground and other states for 114-128Cd isotopes, the energy ratios E41+/E21+, the reduced transition probabilities B(E2) results, as well as the BE2;41+21-Cd/BE2;21+01-Cd ratios, and the potential energy surface (EPS), are discussed comprehensively below.

The simplest way to determine the IBM-1 parameters is to use the energy ratio (R) as a starting point for calculations. The energy ratio, R=E41+/E21+, indicates the symmetrical form of a nucleus. The E41+ and E21+ patterns correspond to the 41+ and 21+ energy levels, respectively. It is well understood that R ≈ 3.33 stands for deformed nuclei SU(3), R ≈ 2.5 is for γ-unstable nuclei O(6), and R ≈ 2 is for vibrational nuclei U(5) [30-32]. The experimental values of the energy ratio of the Cd isotopes are shown in Table I. The best values for the parameters that provide a suitable fit between the theoretical and experimental energy levels of the Cd isotopes are shown in Table II, while Table III shows the best-fit parameters for the other bands of NEE (6).

Table I The energy ratios of Cd isotopes. 

Isotopes 114 Cd 116Cd 118 Cd 120 Cd 122Cd 124Cd 126Cd 128Cd
R4/2 2.29 2.38 2.39 2.38 2.33 2.26 2.25 2.21

Table II Shows the IBM-1 and NEE parameters in MeV for 114-128Cd, except for Nb A2 and A3. The pairing, angular momentum, and octupole operators are denoted by the letters PAIR, ELL, and OCT, respectively. 

Isotope Nb IBM NEE
EPS PAIR ELL QQ A1 A1 A3
114Cd 9 0.510 0.057 0.014 0.056 0.0018 0.0055 -8.6383
116Cd 8 0 0.071 0.013 0.051 0.5147 1.6424 -2.0039
118Cd 7 0 0.080 0.009 0.053 0.0335 0.1086 -3.4837
120Cd 6 0 0.099 0.010 0.055 0.0760 0.2287 -2.1158
122Cd 5 0.530 0.142 0.013 0.058 0.1274 0.3536 -1.64348
124Cd 4 0.580 0.153 0.014 0.063 0.0001 0.0004 -12.7729
126Cd 3 0.610 0.183 0.005 0.063 1.3200 3.8510 -2.6660
128Cd 2 0.620 0.197 0.003 0.065 1.3179 3.8221 -2.5590

Table III NEE parameters of the other band in MeV for the Cd isotopes. 

Isotopes Eo B
114Cd 1.021 -0.0005
116Cd 1.1308 -0.1487
118Cd 1.2231 -0.0033
120Cd 1.2503 0.0005
122Cd 1.4798 0.0003
124Cd 1.5895 -0.2466
126Cd 1.1373 0.0109
128Cd 1.1700 -0.0115

The results of the IBM-1 and NEE calculations of the energy levels for ground and other states of the Cd isotope are presented in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The low-lying spectrum in Cd nuclei values of the IBM-1 and NEE are really equivalent to available experimental results for 0+, 2 +, 4+, and 6+ states. For the high states, the NEE and IBM-1 calculations are slightly overpredicted with the exception of the 114Cd and 118Cd nuclei, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The levels marked with an asterisk (*) represent cases that the spin or parity of the respective states has not been established experimentally. The IBM-1, NEE, and experimental data on the energy level structures of Cd nuclei appear at first glance to be similar for the other states, as shown in Fig. 2. However, we can render a few predictions based on a comparison of theoretical predictions and experimental results. For the IBM-1 description, the spacing between both 2+ states is slightly overestimated in 114Cd and underestimated in 116-118Cd. There is no gap between both 2+ states in 114-122Cd in the NEE description. Conversely, the comparison between the energies of the states, i.e. for the 6+ states, is significantly improved.

Figure 1 Experimental low-lying energies obtained from [33] in 114-128Cd isotopes compared to IBM-1 and NEE calculations. 

Figure 2 The other states of the even-even 114-128 Cd isotopes. 

As already mentioned, the symmetry shape of a nucleus can be predicted from the energy ratio R=E41+/E21+. Then, the collective dynamics of even-even nuclei energy can be classified into three subgroups: SU(3), O(6), and U(5). The R4/2 values of low-lying energy levels of Cd isotopes vary as a function of mass number for experimental values, IBM-I, SU(3), O(6), and U(5) limits as presented in Fig. 3. The calculated energy ratios, R4/2, of Cd nuclei agree well with experimental results, with small exceptions for 116-120Cd nuclei. Furthermore, this figure clearly demonstrates the transition between the collective structures of U(5) and O(6). We clearly notice that the energy ratio increases very slowly with increasing the neutron number up to 120Cd, after which it decreases in the experimental results. However, the IBM-1 results show relatively small fluctuations.

Figure 3 Comparison of the E41+/E21+ values for the experimental data and IBM-1 calculations with the U(5), O(6),and SU(3) limits for Cd isotopes. 

The electromagnetic transitions operator in IBM-1 has a general form [7,28]:

T^(L)=γ0s×s~(0)+α2d×s~+s×d~(2)+βLd×d~(L), (7)

where γ0, α2, and β (L=0, 1, 2, 3, 4) are parameters identifying the different terms in the corresponding operators. The reduced electrical transition probabilities provide information about nuclei structure. The E2 transition operator is recognized to be a Hermitian tensor. As a result, the Nb is always conserved. Then, the E2 transition operator is represented as [34]:

T^(E)=α2ds+sd(2)+βLdd(2), (8)

here, the (s, d) and (s, d) symbols refer to creation and annihilation operators, respectively. The α2 represents to the effective charge for boson and β2 is a dimensionless coefficient, β2 = χ α2. The B(E2) values for electrical transition probabilities are described in terms of reduced matrix elementsas [28,34,35]:

BE2IiIf=12Li+1<IfTE2Ii>2. (9)

The effective charges eB for Cd isotopes are shown in Table IV. The experimental values of B(E2:21+01+) were reproduced from the eB values. The results of the IBM-1 and available experimental data for B(E2) values of (g → g, β → β, γ → γ and γ → β) transitions for 114-128Cd isotopes are shown in Table V. Furthermore, the results of the ground state bands of B(E2) data for 21+01+  41+21+,61+41+,81+61+ levels demonstrated that the IBM-1 calculations with the experimental data for 114-120Cd isotopes matched with a maximum associated error of 23%, while experimental data are lacking for the other Cd isotopes. The B(E2,21+01+) of114-118Cd isotopes gradually increases as the number of neutrons increases. For the other isotopes, however, the B(E2) values tend to fluctuate, confirming that these states are expected to be deformed. Moreover, the B(E2,21+21+) decreases with increasing neutron number, except for 114Cd isotope. Other transitional levels exhibit similar variations and can be interpreted similarly. The experimentally published and determined B(E2) values for 114-128Cd isotopes generally agree well in some places. Other important quantities, such as the B(E2) ratio, are used to demonstrate that the Cd isotopes are deformed nuclei and tend to have a dynamical symmetry U(5)-O(6). For all nuclei under inquiry, the B(E2) ratio is calculated and presented in Fig. 4. The comparison of experimental data and IBM-1 calculations for Cd isotopes is also shown in this figure. We also calculated the BE2;41+21+/BE2;21+01+Cd ratio in Cd isotopes, and found that the B(E2) ratio shows almost little variations with respect to the isotope mass number. These values are smaller than the corresponding γ-unstable nuclei O(6) and approach the vibrational limit U(5). Moreover, the theoretical values of the B(E2) ratio for these nuclei are in good agreement with the experimental data. As a result, Cd isotopes are closer to the U(5)-O(6) boundary.

Table IV B(E2) values for 114-128Cd were reproduced using an effective charge, eB

Isotope Nb eB (eb)
114 Cd 9 0.071
116 Cd 8 0.076
118Cd 7 0.085
120Cd 6 0.087
122Cd 5 0.093
124Cd 4 0.098
126Cd 3 0.104
128Hf 2 0.109

Table V Theoretical versus experimental B(E2) for 114-128Cd isotopes in unit ofe2b2 are compared. 

114Cd 116Cd 118Cd
Ii → If EXP. IBM-1 EXP. IBM-1 EXP. IBM-1
21+01+ 0.102 0.101 0.113 0.112 0.114 0.114
23+02+ 0.213 0.267 - 0.070 - 0.065
22+21+ 0.072 0.141 0.084 0.152 - 0.148
23+22+ 0.089 0.043 - 0.000 - 0.000
23+41+ 0.148 0.090 - 0.000 - 0.000
41+21+ 0.203 0.152 0.188 0.152 0.209 0.184
42+22+ 0.105 0.083 - 0.000 - 0.082
42+23+ 0.390 0.152 - 0.092 - 0.000
42+41+ 0.058 0.075 0.504 0.342 - 0.074
61+41+ 0.390 0.258 0.361 0.2961 - 0.156
62+42+ 0.426 0.261 - 0.094 - 0.000
81+61+ 0.283 0.161 - 0.159 - 0.147
Ii → If 120Cd 122Cd 124Cd
EXP. IBM-1 EXP. IBM-1 EXP. IBM-1
22+21+ - 0.091 0.093 0.089 - 0.059
21+01+ - 0.118 - 0.115 - -
41+21+ - 0.118 - 0.115 - 0.072
42+22+ - 0.063 - 0.058 - -
42+41+ - 0.058 - 0.112 - -
61+41+ - 0.121 - 0.089 - 0.063
81+61+ - 0.107 - 0.089 - 0.038
Ii → If 126Cd 128Cd
EXP. IBM-1 EXP. IBM-1
21+01+ - 0.069 - 0.072
22+21+ - 0.083 - 0.072
41+21+ - 0.083 - 0.072
42+22+ - 0.031 - -
42+41+ - 0.028 - -
61+41+ - 0.059 - -

Figure 4 

The potential energy surface (EPS) application provides information to determine the microscopic and geometric shapes of nuclei. IBM Hamiltonian produced the EPS plots using the Skyrme mean field procedure [30]. The IBM-1 energy surface is constructed by combining the IBM-1 Hamiltonian's expectation value with the coherent state N,B,γ[6]. The creation operators bc act on a state of boson vacuum |0) to produce the coherent state as follows [31,36]:

N,B,γ>=1/N!bcN0>, (10)

where

bc=1+β21/2×βcosγd0+1/2sinγd2+d-2, (11)

then, the EPS can be written in terms of β and γ as [32]:

EN,β,γ=Nεdβ21+β2+N(N+1)1+β22×α1β2+α2β3cos3γ+α3β2α4. (12)

Where α's parameters are associated with the coefficient of CL, v2, v0, and u0, as seen in Eq. (1). The term β refers to a nucleus total deformation. Then, the shape of a nucleus could be spherical or distorted depending on whether β = 0 or not. Moreover, the variation in nucleus symmetry is represented by γ term, when γ = 0, the nucleus has a prolate shape; when γ = 60, it has an oblate shape. The deformation energy surfaces of the even-even isotopes 114-128Cd were estimated as plotted in Fig. 5. The energy surfaces formed a prolate and a slightly oblate threshold that should correlate with proton normal and intruder excitations [21]. The 116-120Cd nuclei, on the other hand, have a deformation shape and a γ-unstable character (γ ≈ 30). While the isotopes 114,122,124,126,128Cd have a potential energy surface that is approximately independent of the triaxial γ-parameter. The U(5)-O(6) transitions were identified in the EPS map for Cd nuclei in the (β, γ) deformation space.

Figure 5 The EPS contour plot for 114-128Cd nuclei. The color panel represents the EPS values in MeV. 

4. Conclusions

Using the IBM-1 and NEE methods, the ground and other state energies, the electromagnetic transition, and the potential energy surface of 114-128Cd isotopes were all calculated theoretically. The results of the ground and other energy levels of Cd isotopes are consistent in some places with previous experimental data, i.e., the description of the energies of the 2+ state is not well represented in the IBM-1 model. Furthermore, the results of the IBM-1 on reduced transition probabilities B(E2) roughly agree with the available experimental data. Similarly, the BE2;41+21+/BE2;21+01+Cd ratio in Cd isotopes varies relatively minimally with respect to nuclear mass number. The EPS contour results for Cd isotopes demonstrate that the investigated Cd isotopes represent a shape phase change from vibrational U(5) to γ-soft O(6) dynamical symmetry. Finally, the 114-128Cd nuclei are minimally prolate and exhibit moderate axial distortion.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the University of Mosul, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Department of Physics for their assistance with this research work.

References

1. H. Lehmann, and Garrett, PE and Jolie, J and Mc-Grath, CA and Yeh, Minfang and Yates, SW, On the nature of three-phonon excitations in 112Cd, Physics Letters B 387 (1996) 259-26, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)01038-6. [ Links ]

2. F. Corminboeuf et al., Structures and lifetimes of states in 110Cd. Physical Review C 63 (2000) 014305, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.014305. [ Links ]

3. P. J. Davies et al., The role of core excitations in the structure and decay of the 16+ spin-gap isomer in 96Cd. Physics Letters B 767 (2017) 474-479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.013. [ Links ]

4. G. Lorusso et al., β-decay half-lives of 110 neutron-rich nuclei across the N= 82 shell gap: implications for the mechanism and universality of the astrophysical r process. Physical review letters 114 (2015) 192501, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.192501. [ Links ]

5. Scharff-Goldhaber, Gertrude, and J. Weneser, System of even-even nuclei. Physical Review 98 (1955) 212, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.98.212. [ Links ]

6. F. Iachello and A. Arima, The interacting boson model Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge (1987). [ Links ]

7. G. L. Long, S. J. Zhu and H. Z. Sun, Description of 116,118,120 Cd in the interacting boson model, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 21 (1995) 331, https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/21/3/008. [ Links ]

8. F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition. Phys. Rev. Let. 87 (2001) 052502, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052502. [ Links ]

9. A. K. Mheemeed, A. Kh Hussein, and R. B. Kheder, Characterization of alpha-particle tracks in cellulose nitrate LR-115 detectors at various incident energies and angles. Applied Radiation and isotopes 79 (2013) 48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.04.020. [ Links ]

10. P. Cejnar, Jan Jolie, and R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei. Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (2010) 2155, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155. [ Links ]

11. H. H. Kassim, A. A. Abd-Aljbar, M. Abed Al-Jubbori, H. Y. Abdullah, I. Hossain, and F. I. Sharrad, Properties of O(6)-U(5) transition symmetry for 122-124Cd isotopes in IBM. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 928 (2020) 072149. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/928/7/072149. [ Links ]

12. I. Hossain, H. Y. Abdullah, I. M. Ahmed, and M. A. Saeed, Ground-state energy band of even 104-122Cd isotopes under the framework of interacting boson model-1: a review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics 7 (2013) 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7235-7-46. [ Links ]

13. I. Morrison, and R. Smith, The interacting boson approximation and the spectroscopy of the even cadmium and tin isotopes. Nuclear Physics A 350 (1980) 89-108, https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(80)90390-5. [ Links ]

14. M. Pignanelli et al., Octupole excitations in vibrational nuclei and the sdf interacting boson model. Nuclear Physics A 519 (1990) 567-601, https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(90)90447-T. [ Links ]

15. J. Kumpulainen et al., Systematic study of low-spin states in even Cd nuclei. Physical Review C 45 (1992) 640, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.45.640. [ Links ]

16. N. Boelaert, N. Smirnova, K. Heyde, and J. Jolie, Shell model description of the low-lying states of the neutron deficient Cd isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 014316, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.014316. [ Links ]

17. M. Kadi, N. Warr, P. E. Garrett, J. Jolie, and S. W. Yates, Vibrational and intruder structures in 116Cd. Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 031306, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.031306. [ Links ]

18. A. Gade et al., Dipole excitations in 108 Cd. Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 03430, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034304. [ Links ]

19. Garrett, PE and Green, KL and Wood, JL, Breakdown of vibrational motion in the isotopes Cd 110-116, Phys. Rev. C , 78 (2008) 044307, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044307. [ Links ]

20. Hossain, I., Hewa Y. Abdullah, I. M. Ahmed, M. A. Saeed, and S. T. Ahmad. Study on ground state energy band of even 114-124Cd isotopes under the framework of interacting boson model (IBM-1). International J. Modern Phys. E 21 (2012) 1250072, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301312500723. [ Links ]

21. K. Nomura, and J. Jolie, Structure of even-even cadmium isotopes from the beyond-mean-field interacting boson model. Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 024303, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024303. [ Links ]

22. A. Leviatan, and N. Gavrielov, J. E. García-Ramos, and P. Van Isacker, Quadrupole phonons in the cadmium isotopes. Physical Review C 98 (2018) 031302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.031302. [ Links ]

23. S. M. Harris, Higher order corrections to the cranking model. Physical Review 138 (1965) B509. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.138.B509. [ Links ]

24. Mo Ao J. Mariscotti, Gertrude Scharff-Goldhaber, and Brian Buck. Phenomenological analysis of ground-state bands in even-even nuclei. Phys. Rev. 178 (1969), 1864, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.178.1864. [ Links ]

25. A. A. Raduta, R. Budaca, and A. Faessler, Analytical description of the coherent state model for near vibrational and well deformed nuclei. Annals of Physics 327 (2012) 671-704, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2011.10.004. [ Links ]

26. A. Arima, and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states I. The vibrational limit. Annals of Phys. 281 (2000) 2-64, https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.2000.6007. [ Links ]

27. R. C. Ewing, W. J. Weber, and F. W. Clinard Jr., Radiation effects in nuclear waste forms for high-level radioactive waste. Progress in nuclear energy 29 (1995) 63-127, https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(94)00016-Y. [ Links ]

28. R. F. Casten and D. D. Warner, The interacting boson approximation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 389, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.60.389. [ Links ]

29. A.-Jubbori, M. Abed, H. H. Kassim, F. I. Sharrad, and I. Hossain. Deformation properties of the even-even rare-earth Er-Os isotopes for N=100. International Journal of Modern Physics E 27 (2018) 1850035, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301318500350. [ Links ]

30. R. F. Casten, and N. V. Zamfir, Empirical realization of a critical point description in atomic nuclei. Physical Review Letters 87 (2001) 052503, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052503. [ Links ]

31. A.-Jubbori, M. A., Huda H. Kassim, F. I. Sharrad, and I. Hossain, Nuclear structure of even 120-136 Ba under the framework of IBM, IVBM and new method (SEF). Nucl. phys. A. 955 (2016) 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.005 [ Links ]

32. H. H. Khudher, A. K. Hasan, and F. I. Sharrad, Calculation of energy levels, transition probabilities, and potential energy surfaces for 120-126 Xe even-even isotopes. Ukrainian J. Phys. 62 (2017) 152-158, [ Links ]

33. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/getENSDFDatasets.jsp. [ Links ]

34. H. H. Kassim, and F. I. Sharrad, Energy levels and electromagnetic transition of 190-196 Pt nuclei. International Journal of Modern Physics E 23 (2014), 1450070, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301314500700. [ Links ]

35. H. H. Kassim et al., Nuclear structure of Even 178-182 Hf Isotopes Under the Framework of Interacting Boson Model (IBM-1). Iranian J. Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science 42 (2018) 993-999, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-016-0104-x. [ Links ]

36. A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, and F. Iachello, Classical limit of the interacting-boson model. Phys. Rev. Let. 44 (1980) 1747, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1747. [ Links ]

Received: November 05, 2021; Accepted: April 22, 2022

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License