SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número3A 1D kinetic model for cosmic microwave background comptonizationSynchronization of fractional-order Lü chaotic oscillators for voice encryption índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.66 no.3 México may./jun. 2020  Epub 26-Mar-2021

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.66.356 

Research

Other areas in Physics

Super dense coding in one-axis twisting model

S. Ahadpoura  * 

F. Mirmasoudia 

aPhysics Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P.O. Box 179, Ardabil, Iran.


Abstract

We study thermal superdense coding in a two-spin model under an external magnetic field. Its dependencies on magnetic field, strength of the spin squeezing and temperature are presented in detail. Our main goal now is to study how we can increase the thermal superdense coding capacity in the presence of magnetic field, strength of the spin squeezing and temperature. It shows that the dense coding tends to a valid value by setting the value of input quantum correlations. Our most important motivation for this study is to examine the relationship between the thermal properties of super quantum discord (SQD) and dense coding. The results show that the thermal properties of the SQD on our channel enable us to determine when and under what conditions the system is suitable for valid dense coding. Our proposals could be lead to that this scheme is efficient for quantum information processing.

Keywords: Super dense coding; one-axis twisting model; super quantum discord

PACS: 03.67.Mn; 75.10.Pq; 73.43.Nq

1. Introduction

Quantum information theory offers many methods on how information may be stored, manipulated, and transmitted [1]. The base of quantum information theory is well known to be the quantum entanglement. It is the most fascinating feature of quantum mechanics that plays an essential role in quantum cryptographic key distribution [2], quantum teleportation [3], and quantum dense coding [4]. For example, in the original dense coding protocol, the sender can transmit two bits of classical information to the receiver by sending a single qubit if they share a two-qubit maximally entangled state. Dense coding has been investigated both experimentally [5] and theoretically [6-8]. Recently, optimal dense coding have been extensively investigated in condensed matter physics due to their good integrability and scalability in the context of quantum information processing [9, 10]. Up to now, various systems have been studied in the field of quantum processes. The spin chains have been considered as one of the most suitable candidates for the study of entanglement and quantum correlations [11-13]. Recently, the cavity quantum electrodynamics system (CQES) has received much attentions since this system offer an ideal coupling between atoms and photons [14]. As a result, it has been widely applied for engineering quantum entanglement and quantum channel [15-21]. The common result of all models show that dynamical properties of the SQD on our channel enable us to determine when and under what conditions the system is suitable for dense coding capacity [22].

Quantum correlations have been comprehensively accepted as the main resource for different quantum information processing tasks. For a long time, the study of quantum correlations has been focused on entangelement [23]. However, recent studies indicated that entanglement does not reveal quantum correlation in separable states, therefore it cannot be considered as a complete measure of quantum correlation. The present work focuses on another concept of quantum correlation, namely quantum discord (QD) [24-27]. The QD is a measure of quantumness of correlations in a bipartite state, which was introduced as the difference between two natural quantum extension of the classical mutual information. Recently, numerous works have been made toward the significance and applications of QD [28, 29]. It should be noted that discord is captured by strong measurements (projective operators). As quantum states are fragile to quantum measurements, the measurement of an arbitrary quantum state in some orthogonal basis (projective measurement) leads to the loss of its coherence. While if the measurement be done weakly, it protects the coherence of the system when we perform a measurement which couples the system and the measuring device weakly. In 1988, Aharonov, Albert and Vaidman have proposed to use weak measurements [30]. Lately, it was shown that weak measurements can also protect QD from the decoherence [31]. It is known that the weak measurement captures more quantum correlation of a bipartite system than the strong (projective) one under certain situation. In technological applications, weak measurements are important for exploring the extra quantum correlation for information processing. Actually, replacing the projective measurement with weaker one in the definition of QD, gives rise to new correlation called super quantum discord (SQD) [33, 34]. Hence, a weak measurement enforced on one of the subsystems can lead to SQD, which is always larger than the normal QD captured by the strong measurement [32].

Our most important motivation for this study is to examine the relationship between thermal properties of SQD and superdense coding. We know that entangled states have the important role in dense coding. Here we propose a two-qubit spin squeezing model as quantum channels to study the thermal dense coding capacity χ. Motivated from the recent study on the thermal of entanglement in the above model, we here devote to examining the quantum correlation properties in terms of SQD with dense coding capacity. Our results suggest that the thermal properties of SQD in the channel can accurately determine the valid dense coding. Dense coding plays a major role in quantum communication, in such a way that valid dense coding detection using the thermal properties of SQD in the channel seems to play an important role in quantum information theory. Therefore, the notion of SQD can be a more useful resource for quantum information processing tasks, quantum communication and quantum computation than QD.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we introduce the Hamiltonian of the systems that we want study dense coding and quantum correlations through them. In Sec. 3 firstly, we briefly review the dense coding scheme, then we obtain the thermal super dense coding and analyze its characters. Finally, the main results will be summarized in Sec. 4.

2. Description of the model

The two-spin model under an external magnetic field and coupled to each other by a one-axis twisting spin squeezing interaction is given by [35, 36]:

H^=μSx2+ΩSz, (1)

where, transverse field term S z can control the strength of the external magnetic field Ω ≥ 0 in z direction. The first term includes an ensemble of N spin-1/2 particles with exchange symmetry that its dynamical properties can be described by collective operators Sα = (1/2)Σ2 i =1 σα i , (α ∈ x,y,z), and σ i α are the Pauli matrices for the i th spin. In the following, we consider N = 2. µ ≥ 0 describes the strength of the spin squeezing interaction in x direction which depends on the scattering lengths between particles and the condensate density. The interaction establishes pairwise correlations between all of individual spins in the collective spin system; in our case bipartite correlations are formed between the two spins. This model is considered as a simple one in solid state in order to generate and manipulate entangled states.

The eigenvalues E n and the corresponding eigenvectors |Ψ n 〉 of Hamiltonian Eq. (1) in the standard basis of |00〉, |10〉, |01〉, |11〉 can be easily obtained as the following forms [38]:

E1,4=μ±κ2, |ψ1,2=1Aμ|00+2Ω±κ|11E2=0,|ψ3=12|10-|10,E3=μ,|ψ4=12|10+|10, (2)

where κ=μ2+4Ω2 and the normalization constant is A=μ2+(2Ω±κ)2. We can introduce thermal fluctuations for the system, the density matrix of this two spins at thermal equilibrium is ρ = (1/Z)e -βH = Σ n=1 4 P(n)| |Ψ n 〉〈 Ψ n |, where P(n) = (1/Z)e -βEn are thermally distributed populations in the quantum states, β = (1/k)T(k = 1) and T is the temperature. Also, Z = Σ n e −βEn is the partition function.

Equipped with these concepts and formulas, we are now in the status to obtain density matrix ρ(T) in the standard basis |00〉, |10〉, |01〉, |11〉,

ρ=ρ1100ρ140ρ22ρ2300ρ23*ρ330ρ14*00ρ44, (3)

with the element of density matrix

ρ11=1zμ2e-βμ/2e-κβ2A+2-eκβ2A-2,

ρ14=1zμe-βμ/2e-κβ22Ω+κA+2-eκβ22Ω-κA-2,

ρ22=ρ23=12z1+e-βμ,

ρ23=ρ32=12z-1+e-βμ,

ρ44=1ze-βμ/2e-κβ22Ω+κ2A+2+eκβ22Ω-κ2A-2,

ρ41= ρ14.

With knowing that density matrix is the X-state form, one can obtain the quantum correlation behaviors by using correlation measure. It is determined that the quantum correlations such as SQD and QD are more comprehensive than entanglement [37]. Recent studies indicated that at a certain temperature entanglement and quantum correlations can be increased with changing the value of the Ω and μ. The results in Ref. [13, 38] indicate that thermal quantum correlations depends on the spin squeezing interaction μ and the external magnetic interaction Ω at the same of temperature. In following, we extend the quantum dense coding to spin channel. Their study show that quantum correlations can approach a maximum value by adjusting the external magnetic field, the spin squeezing interaction and temperature.

3. Superdense Coding

Now, we carry out the thermal optimal dense coding in one-axis twisting model as a quantum channel. For this purpose, the set of mutually orthogonal unitary transformations is necessary to be made. The set of mutually orthogonal unitary transformations for two-qubit are given as follows [39]:

U00|j=|jU01|j=|j+1(mod2)U10|j=e-1(2π/2)j|jU11|j=e-1(2π/2)j|j+1(mod2) (4)

where |j〉 is the single qubit computational basis (|j〉 = |0〉, |1〉). The average state of the ensemble of signal states generated by the unitary transformations Eq. (4) given by:

ρ*¯=14i=03(UiI2)ρ(UiI2) (5)

where 0 stands for 00, 1 for 01, 2 for 10, 3 for 11, and ρ is the density matrix of the quantum channel. Eq. (4) represents the operations that Alice(sender) performs on the shared entangled state ρ. If the sender does the set of mutually orthogonal unitary transformations, the maximum dense coding capacity χ can be obtained by

χ=S(ρ*¯)-S(ρ) (6)

where S(ρ*¯) is an von Neumann entropy for the average state of ensemble of signal states ρ*¯, and S(ρ) is the von Neumann entropy of the quantum channel. If χ > 1 dense coding is valid, and for optimal dense coding χ must be the maximum, i.e. χ max = 2. In the following, we will use one-axis twisting spin squeezing interaction as a quantum channel to study the optimal dense coding.

Figure 1 (a) presents the effects of temperature on dense coding described by Eq. (4) for Ω = 1and different values of µ. We found that valid dense coding exists at T = 0, whereas with the enhancement of temperature the dense coding capacity decreases quickly to the minimum value. From Fig. 1 (a) one can see that valid dense coding vanishes with increasing µ in the limit of low temperatures. In order to transmit ρ(T)with valid dense coding, we require the value of χ to be strictly greater than 1. In Fig. 1 (b), we consider the strength of the external magnetic field µ = 2 with various values of spin squeezing interaction Ω. It can be said that valid dense coding happens with decreasing Ω at µ = 2 for the smaller values of temperature. In general from Figs. 1, the influence of Ω and µ on the valid dense coding can be obvious when the temperature is increasing from zero. The optimal dense coding vanishing occurs by increasing temperature in the a short range. By choosing the appropriate value for Ω and µ,we can preserve valid dense coding at the short range of temperature, for which exists valid dense coding by increasing and µ.

Figure 1 The super dense coding capacity as a function of temperature, (a) with external field interaction Ω = 1 and different of value for spin squeezing interaction μ, (b) with spin squeezing interaction μ = 2 and different of value for external field interaction for the spin channel. 

In the following, we tend to study the effects of Ω and µ on dense coding capacity at low temperature. We can identify valid dense coding with the help of calculating SQD in the quantum channel. Figure 2 indicates that the dense coding capacity is plotted as a function of Ω and µ at same temperature T = 0.5. It indicates that thermal dense coding capacity depends on the spin squeezing interaction µ and the external magnetic interaction Ω at the same of temperature. One can see clearly that there is no thermal valid dense coding when he strength of the spin squeezing or the strength of the external magnetic filed is zero. Hence, we can say that weaker or stronger external magnetic field will change the valid dense coding for the smaller value of T. We are looking for whether we can identify valid dense coding with the help of calculating the quantum correlation in the quantum channel. Formalism for a special subset of two qubit density operators named X-state is provided to calculate SQD in Refs. [32, 47, 56] or see appendix of this paper. In order to see the relationship between dynamical properties of quantum correlations and thermal dense coding capacity, in Fig. 3 we plot thermal SQD and dense coding capacity for various values of external field Ω with spin squeezing interaction µ. They show that dense coding capacity is similar to the behavior of SQD. Therefore the prediction of dense coding behavior is feasible through the thermal properties of SQD in the quantum channel. As a result through the thermal properties of SQD, we can determine when and under what conditions the channel is suitable for dense coding. Moreover, we can see the value of valid dense coding with the dencreasing of external field in µ = 1.

Figure 2 The super dense coding capacity as a function of external magnetic interaction Ω, spin squeezing interaction μ for the spin channel in T = 0.5. 

Figure 3 The super dense coding capacity and SQD as a function of temperature with spin squeezing interaction μ = 1 with different of values external field (a) Ω = 0:5 (b) Ω = 1:2 (c) Ω = 2. 

4. Conclution

In this work, we have studied the thermal valid dense coding in a system of two spins under an external magnetic field and coupled to each other by a one-axis twisting spin squeezing. We investigated that the thermal properties of SQD how can have important role in predictng valid dense coding. We turn to the main goal of our study, first we investigated the role of squeezing interaction and the external magnetic interaction on dense coding capacity. The results showed that dense coding capacity decreases by increase of temperature. Also, the spin squeezing interaction and the external magnetic interaction have an important role in thermal valid dense coding. Comparing thermal properties of the quantum channel and dense coding capacity leads to an interesting outcome. That we can identify valid dense coding with the help of calculating the SQD in the quantum channel.

References

1. S. M. Barnett, Quantum Information (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009). [ Links ]

2. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 661, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661. [ Links ]

3. C. H. Bennett et al., Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1895, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895. [ Links ]

4. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podosly-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2881, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881. [ Links ]

5. K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, P. G. Kwiat, and A. Zeilinger, Dense Coding in Experimental Quantum Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 4656, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4656. [ Links ]

6. A. Barenco and A. K. Ekert, Dense Coding Based on Quantum Entanglement, J. Mod. Opt. 42 (1995) 1253, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349514551091. [ Links ]

7. S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Dense coding for continuous variables, Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 042302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.042302. [ Links ]

8. S. Bose, M. B. Plenio, V. Vedral, Mixed state dense coding and its relation to entanglement measures, J. Mod. Opt. 47 (2000) 291, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244043. [ Links ]

9. C. Jiang-Tao, A. Ahmad, B. Yan-Kui, and J. Guang-Sheng, Effects of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction on Optimal Dense Coding Using a Two-Qubit Heisenberg XXZ Chain with and without External Magnetic Field, Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 (2011) 020307, https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/28/2/020307. [ Links ]

10. B.-B. Zhang and G.-H. Yang, Dense Coding in a Two-Spin Squeezing Model with Intrinsic Decoherence, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 (2016) 4731, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-3096-6. [ Links ]

11. T. Werlang and G. Rigolin, Thermal and magnetic quantum discord in Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010) 044101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.044101. [ Links ]

12. F. Mirmasoudi and S. Ahadpour, Application quantum renormalization group to optimal dense coding in transverse Ising model, Physica A 515 (2019) 232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.192. [ Links ]

13. S. Ahadpour and F. Mirmasoudi, Thermal Quantum Discord and Super Quantum Discord Teleportation Via a Two-Qubit Spin-Squeezing Model, Theor. Math. Phys. 195 (2018) 628, https://doi.org/10.1134/S004057791804013X. [ Links ]

14. T. Aoki et al., Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator, Nature 443 (2006) 671, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05147. [ Links ]

15. J.-S. Zhang and J.-B. Xu, Control of the entanglement of a two-level atom in a dissipative cavity via a classical field, Opt. Commun. 282 (2009) 2543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2009.03.015. [ Links ]

16. F. Altintas and R. Eryigit, Creation of quantum correlations between two atoms in a dissipative environment from an initial vacuum state, Phys. Lett. A 376 (2012) 1791, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.04.023. [ Links ]

17. F. Altintas ans R. Eryigit, Dissipative dynamics of quantum correlations in the strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013) 022124, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.022124. [ Links ]

18. F. Mirmasoudi and S. Ahadpour, Dynamics super quantum discord and quantum discord teleportation in the Jaynes-Cummings model, J. Mod. Opt. 65 (2018) 730, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2017.1397216. [ Links ]

19. L.-J. Feng, Y.-J. Zhang, and Y.-J. Xia, Dynamics and improvement of quantum correlations in the triple Jaynes-Cummings model, Opt. Commun. 366 (2016) 328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.01.022. [ Links ]

20. W. Rawlinson and R. Vyas, Enhancement of discord and entanglement with detuning for two coupled quantum dots in a driven cavity, J. Mod. Opt. 62 (2015) 1061, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2015.1019383. [ Links ]

21. F. Altintas and R. Eryigit, Quantum correlations between identical and unidentical atoms in a dissipative environment, J. Phys. B 44 (2011) 125501, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/12/125501. [ Links ]

22. F. Mirmasoudi and S. Ahadpour, Dynamics of super quantum discord and optimal dense coding in quantum channels, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) 345302, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aacd29. [ Links ]

23. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 865, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. [ Links ]

24. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Discord: A Measure of the Quantumness of Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2001) 017901, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901. [ Links ]

25. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 715, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715. [ Links ]

26. K. Modi, T. Paterek, W. Son, V. Vedral, and M. Williamson, Unified View of Quantum and Classical Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 080501, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.080501. [ Links ]

27. V. E. Zobov, Quantum and classical correlations in high-temperature dynamics of two coupled large spins, Theor. Math. Phys. 177 (2013) 1377, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-013-0110-5. [ Links ]

28. S. Banerjee, S. Bera, and T. P. Singh, Quantum discord as a tool for comparing collapse models and decoherence, Phys. Lett. A 380 (2016) 3778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.036. [ Links ]

29. H.-M. Zou and M.-F. Fang, Discord and entanglement in non-Markovian environments at finite temperatures, Chin. Phys. B 25 (2016) 090302, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/25/9/090302. [ Links ]

30. Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1351, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351. [ Links ]

31. Y.-S. Kim, J.-C. Lee, O. Kwon, and Y.-H. Kim, Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal, Nature Phys. 8 (2012) 117, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2178. [ Links ]

32. T. Li, T. Ma, Y. Wang, S. Fei, and Z. Wang, Super Quantum Discord for X-type States, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 (2015) 680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2260-0. [ Links ]

33. C. C. Rulli and M. S. Sarandy, Global quantum discord in multipartite systems, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 042109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042109. [ Links ]

34. M. Berta, M. Christandl, R. Colbeck, J. M. Renes, and R. Renner, The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory, Nature Phys. 6 (2010) 659, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1734. [ Links ]

35. M. Kitagawa and M Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 5138, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138. [ Links ]

36. X. Wang and B. C. Sanders, Spin squeezing and pairwise entanglement for symmetric multiqubit states, Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 012101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.012101. [ Links ]

37. W. H. Zurek, Einselection and decoherence from an information theory perspective, Ann. Phys. 9 (2000) 855, https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3889(200011)9:11/12<855::AID-ANDP855>3.0.CO;2-K. [ Links ]

38. W. Rong and Y. Guo-Hui, Entanglement Teleportation via Two-Qubit Spin Squeezing Model, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 (2016) 920, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-015-2737-5. [ Links ]

39. T. Hiroshima, Optimal dense coding with mixed state entanglement, J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 6907, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/316. [ Links ]

40. J. Maziero T. Werlang, F. F. Fanchini, L. C. Céleri, and R. M. Serra, System-reservoir dynamics of quantum and classical correlations, Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010) 022116, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022116. [ Links ]

41. N. Li and S. Luo, Total versus quantum correlations in quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 032327, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.032327. [ Links ]

42. B. Groisman, S. Popescu, and A. Winter, Quantum, classical, and total amount of correlations in a quantum state, Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 032317, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032317. [ Links ]

43. L. Mazzola, J. Piilo, and S. Maniscalco, Sudden Transition between Classical and Quantum Decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 200401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.200401. [ Links ]

44. X.-Q. Yan and B.-Y. Zhang, Collapse-revival of quantum discord and entanglement, Ann. Phys. 349 (2014) 350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.07.001. [ Links ]

45. S. Luo, Using measurement-induced disturbance to characterize correlations as classical or quantum, Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 022301, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022301; S. Wu, U. V. Poulsen, and K. Mo/lmer, Correlations in local measurements on a quantum state and complementarity as an explanation of nonclassicality, ibid. 80 (2009) 032319, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032319. [ Links ]

46. A. Datta, Quantum discord between relatively accelerated observers, Phys. Rev. A 80 (2009) 052304, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052304; R. Dillenschneider, Quantum discord and quantum phase transition in spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 224413, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.224413; M. S. Sarandy, Classical correlation and quantum discord in critical systems, Phys. Rev. A 80 (2009) 022108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022108; J. Maziero, L. C. Céleri, R. M. Serra, and V. Vedral, Classical and quantum correlations under decoherence, ibid. 80 (2009) 044102, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.044102. [ Links ]

47. M. Ali, A. R. P. Rau, and G. Alber, Quantum discord for two-qubit X states, Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010) 042105, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042105. [ Links ]

48. X.-M. Lu, J. Ma, Z. Xi, and X. Wang, Optimal measurements to access classical correlations of two-qubit states, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 012327, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012327. [ Links ]

49. Q. Chen, C. Zhang, S. Yu, X. X. Yi, and C. H. Oh, Quantum discord of two-qubit X states, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 042313, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042313. [ Links ]

50. Y. Huang, Quantum discord for two-qubit X states: Analytical formula with very small worst-case error, Phys. Rev. A 88 (2013) 014302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.014302. [ Links ]

51. C.-Z. Wang, C.-X. Li, L.-Y. Nie, and J.-F. Li, Classical correlation and quantum discord mediated by cavity in two coupled qubits, J. Phys. B 44 (2010) 015503, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/1/015503. [ Links ]

52. L. Henderson and V. Vedral, Classical, quantum and total correlations, J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 6899, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315. [ Links ]

53. Y. Yao et al., Quantum discord in quantum random access codes and its connection to dimension witnesses, Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012) 062310, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062310. [ Links ]

54. Z. Guo, H. Cao, and S. Qu, Robustness of quantum correlations against linear noise, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 195301, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/19/195301. [ Links ]

55. U. Singh and A. K. Pati, Quantum discord with weak measurements, Ann. Phys. 343 (2014) 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.02.004. [ Links ]

56. N. Jing and B. Yu, Super quantum discord for general two qubit X states, Quantum Inf. Process. 16 (2017) 99, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-017-1547-5. [ Links ]

Appendix

A.

Here, we briefly explain QD and SQD as the measures of quantum correlations used in our investigation. QD was originally defined as the difference between total correlation and the classical correlation and it measures all nonclassical correlations. It prepares us information on the quantum nature of the correlations in a bipartite system without emphasis that it is entangled or separable [40-42]. For a bipartite system AB quantum discord is given by [24]:

QD(ρAB)=I(ρAB)-C(ρAB) (A.1)

the quantity C(ρAB) is defined as a measure of classical correlation [43]:

C(ρAB)=S(ρA)-S(ρA|B) (A.2)

Where ρAB denotes the bipartite density matrix of a composite system AB, ρ A and ρ B represent the density matrices of parts A and B. The quantity S(ρ) = −trρlogρ refers to the Neumann entropy and ρ A = tr B ρ AB represent the reduced states for subsystem A(B), where tr stands for the trace of matrix [44-46]. The quantum conditional entropy is given by

S(ρA|B)=minΠiBS(ρA|ΠiB)=minΠiBiS(ρA|i) (A.3)

with the minimization being over all projection-valued measurements, Π i B , performed on the subsystem B. Where {Π i B } denotes a complete set of positive operator-valued measure (POVM) performed on the subsystem B, in such a way that Σ j Π i B = 1. The probability for obtaining outcome i is pi = tr AB [I A Π i B )ρ AB (I A Π i B )], and the corresponding post measurement state for the subsystem A is

ρA|i=(IAΠiB)ρAB(IAΠiB)pi (A.4)

where I A is the identity operator on the Hilbert space H A . The total correlation is quantified by the quantum mutual information I(ρ AB ):

I(ρAB)=S(ρA)+S(ρB)+Σi=14ϵilog2ϵi (A.5)

For X state, described by the density matrix Eq. 3, the reduced matrix of ρ A and ρ B is given by:

SρA=-ρ11+ρ22log2ρ11+ρ22-(ρ33+ρ44)log2ρ33+ρ44 (A.6)

SρB=-ρ11+ρ33log2ρ11+ρ33-(ρ22+ρ44)log2ρ22+ρ44 (A.7)

The eigenvalues of the density matrix ρ AB , ∈i, are given by:

ϵ1=12(ρ11+ρ44)+(ρ11-ρ44)2+4|ρ14|2 (A.8)

ϵ2=12(ρ11+ρ44)-(ρ11-ρ44)2+4|ρ14|2 (A.9)

ϵ3=12(ρ22+ρ33)+(ρ22-ρ33)2+4|ρ23|2 (A.10)

ϵ4=12(ρ22+ρ33)-(ρ22-ρ33)2+4|ρ23|2 (A.11)

The calculation of QD is a complex function due to the optimization over all possible measurements, at present there exists no general analytical expression of discord even for the simplest case of two-qubit state. Hopefully, for the a special bipartite quantum X-state described by the density matrix ρ Eq. (3), the analytical expression of the QD is specified by [47]. Despite some counterexamples have been given in [48, 49], Huang confirmed numerically, in a recent article [50], that the Ali and et al. algorithm is valid with worst case absolute error 0.0021 for two qubit X states. According to proposed scheme proposed in Ref. [47, 51]:

QD(ρAB)=min(Q1,Q2), (A.12)

where,

Qi=H(ρ11+ρ33)+i=14ϵilog2ϵi+Dj,D1=H1+[1-2(ρ33+ρ44)]2+4(|ρ14|+|ρ23|)22,D2=-iρiilog2ρii-H(ρ11+ρ33),H(x)=-xlog2x-(1-x)log2(1-x).

It is necessary to say a few important feature to discord. Firstly discord is always non-negative [52]. Secondly, discord is asymmetric under the interchange of A and B. The main idea of calculation discord is to extract some information about A by reading the state of B without disturbing of state A in any way. When discord is minimized, we disturb these correlation at least and hence we extract maximum information [53, 54].

Now, let us to define what we call to the SQD [55]. A kind of quantum correlation in quantum information processing is SQD with weak measurement which is always larger than the QD captured by the strong measurement. These are called weak measurement operators because they do not cause complete collapse. The weak measurement operators are given as:

P(x)=1±tanhx2Π0+1tanhx2Π1 (A.13)

where x is the strength parameter of measurement, Π 0 and Π 1 are orthogonal projectors that satisfy Π0 + Π1 = I. In addition, in the strong measurement limit we have the projective measurement operators, i.e., limx→∞ P(+x) = Π 0 and limx→∞ P(-x) = Π 1. For small x, the distance between the initial state and state after the measurement is close to zero, i.e., action of Px) does not alter the state of the system much. If we replace all projection measurements with weaker ones in classical correlation and quantum discord, it leads to a new type of quantum correlations called SQD. The classical correlation represents the information gained about the subsystem A after performing the measurements P B (x) = P(x) on subsystem B [52]. The SQD denoted by D w (ρ AB ) is defined as:

DwρAB=SρB-SρAB+min{PB(x)}SwA|PB(x) (A.14)

This is a positive quantity which follows from monotonicity of the mutual information, where the weak quantum conditional entropy is given by:

SwA|PB(x)=p+xSρA|PB(+x)+p-xSρA|PB(-x), (A.15)

with

p(x)=trAB[(IAPB(±x))ρAB(IAPB(±x))],

and

ρA|PB(±x)=trB[(IAPB(±x))ρAB(IAPB(±x))]trAB[(IAPB(±x))ρAB(IAPB(±x))].

where IA is the identity operator on the Hilbert space HA. Also, PBx) is the weak measurement operator performed on subsystem B and ρA|PB(±x) is the post measurement state for the subsystem A after the weak measurement. Unluckily, SQD is also difficult to calculate. At recent years, some researchers have tried to calculate it. They were able to give only few explicit formula for general X-type two-qubit states [32, 56]. In this article, we will use the method of reference [32]. From Eq. (A.14) the SQD is given by

DwρAB=p+xλ+log2λ+λ-log2λ+p-xκ+log2κ++κ-log2κ-+SρB-SρAB

that

κ±=121±tanh[x]a12-a22+(a3-c3z3)21-b3z3λ±=121±tanh[x]a12+a22+(a3+c3z3)21+b3z3

and

p(+x)=12(1+b3z3tanh[x])p(-x)=12(1-b3z3tanh[x])

These parameters are determined by the entries of the density matrix,

a3=ρ11-ρ44-ρ22-ρ33b3=ρ11-ρ44-ρ22+ρ33c3=ρ11+ρ44-ρ22-ρ33c1=2(ρ23+ρ14)c2=2(ρ23-ρ14)a1=z1Re[c1]+z2Im[c2]a2=z2Re[c2]-z1Im[c1]

Now, we can compute the minimum value of DW (ρAB). In order to avoid redundant narrating, we only state that the minimum value lies at z1 = z2 = 0 and z3 = 1 in our work.

Received: May 28, 2019; Accepted: September 12, 2019

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License