SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número3Nonlinear fractional stimulated Raman exact passage in three-level λ systemsSuper dense coding in one-axis twisting model índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de física

versão impressa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.66 no.3 México Mai./Jun. 2020  Epub 26-Mar-2021

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.66.352 

Research

Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics

A 1D kinetic model for cosmic microwave background comptonization

A. Sandoval-Villalbazoa 

aDepartment of Physics and Mathematics, U. Iberoamericana, Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe 01219, México City, México


Abstract

This work presents a novel derivation of the expressions that describe the distortions of the cosmic microwave background curve due to the interactions between photons and the electrons present in dilute ionized systems. In this approach, a simplified one-dimensional evolution equation for the photon number occupation is applied to describe the mentioned interaction. This methodology emphasizes the physical features of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and suggests the existence of links between basic statistical physics and complex applications involving radiative processes.

Keywords: Kinetic theory; CMB; comptonization

PACS: 95.30.Qd; 98.70.Vc; 05.20.Dd; 95.30.Jx

1. Introduction

One of the most relevant physical phenomena in modern cosmology is the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect (SZE). Cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons get Comptonized when they interact with electrons in systems such as the hot gas present between clusters of galaxies. The frequency shift associated with the Compton effect cause distortions to the Planck CMB curve (T ≃ 2.725K). These distortions were first quantified using the Kompaneets equation, which corre- sponds to a photon diffusion approach to the problem [1].

Two basic phenomena have been identified in the SZE in terms of the motion of the electrons. The first one is related to the bulk motion of the cluster (kinematic SZE), while the second one corresponds to the random motion of the particles present in the intracluster gas (thermal SZE). Both effects are important in order to determine cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant, as well as primary anisotropies in the CMB spectrum [2,3].

The photon diffusion approach was questioned by Rephaeli nearly 25 years ago, due to the low density of the gas. This author also noticed that mild-relativistic effects become relevant to determine cluster velocities in several astrophysical scenarios [4]. The approach taken by Rephaeli to describe the thermal SZE was based on photon scattering techniques that involved convolution integrals that were evaluated numerically. After that work, there have been lots of contributions regarding alternative derivations of the SZE and the inclusion of other possible causes of additional CMB distortions such as magnetic fields, double Compton scattering or very large wavelength acoustic waves [5]. More recent work suggests a relation between the SZE and the characterization of dark matter particles related to high energy reactions [6].

The present paper aims is to present a derivation of the SZE based on a simple kinetic 1D model of the electron gas in order to show statistical properties that link the photon scattering approach to other branches of statistical physics. The formalism reproduces both the kinematic and thermal effects in the non-relativistic regime and suggests extensions of the SZE formalism to interdisciplinary areas corresponding to low-density limits of diffusive-type processes.

To accomplish this task, the paper has been divided as follows: In section two, the basic thermodynamic properties of black body radiation are reviewed. Section three is dedicated to the derivation of the kinematic SZE, while section four is devoted to the analysis of the thermal SZE in which the present approach is compared with the original formalism based on the Kompaneets equation. Section five includes final remarks and a brief description of future work regarding this active area of research.

2. CMB Basics

The starting point of the formalism is the occupation number for a Planck distribution:

n(0)(ν)=1ehνkT-1, (1)

where h = 6.626 × 10-34 J·s is the Planck constant, k = 1.38 × 10-23 J/K is Boltzmann’s constant and T = 2.725 K is the CMB temperature. The internal energy density corresponding to the occupation number is given by

u(v)=8πhν3c3n(0)(ν). (2)

The intensity associated with the internal energy density reads:

I(ν)=c4πu(v). (3)

In CMB physics it is customary to define de dimensionless frequency x as:

x=hνkT, (4)

Eq. (3) can then be rewritten as:

I(x)=2(kT)3(hc)2x3ex-1. (5)

The maximum intensity value corresponding to Eq. (5) is x ≃ 2.821 which corresponds to the microwave frequency v ≃ 1.601 × 1011 Hz at the current CMB temperature.

3. Kinematic SZE

In the simplest model, all the electrons present in the dilute gas move with velocity uk along the x direction. The dimensionless parameter βk s given by:

βk=ukc. (6)

The frequency shift ν^ for CMB photons reads:

ν^=ν(1±βk). (7)

Now, if τ represents the fraction of photons scattered by the electrons, the perturbed occupation number n(p) (v) is given by:

n(p)(ν)=n(0)(ν)-τn(0)(ν)+τn(0)(ν^). (8)

The last term in the right-hand side of Eq. (8) corresponds to the number of photons with frequency ν^ after the photon-electron interactions. This term can be approximated using a Taylor series expansion as:

n0v^n0v±βkvn0v, (9)

so that Eq. (8) now reads:

n(p)(ν)-n(0)(ν)=Δn=±βkτn(0)νν. (10)

To compute the change in the intensity spectrum ΔI = I(P) - I (0) due to the kinematic SZE one can apply the relation:

ΔII(0)=Δnn(0), (11)

ΔI / I(0) can now be established using Eqs. (1), (4) and (11), thus obtaining

ΔI(x)=2(kT)3(hc)2x4ex(ex-1)2βkτ (12)

Eq. (12) is the well-known expression of the kinematic SZE [4]. Its shape, scaled in terms of the factor βτ is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1 Kinematic SZE. The intracluster gas is assumed to move homogeneously with scaled speed producing an intensity distortion. ΔI is expressed as a function of x = (hv = kT) and in units of (2(kT)3/ (hc)2). 

4. Thermal SZE

We now consider the case in which the electron velocities satisfy a given 1D distribution function P = P(v). Photons of different frequencies contribute to the perturbed occupation number N(p) (v) in the SZE. Historically, N(p) (v) was first established using the Kompaneets equation approximation:

np-n0τz=Δn(ν)τz=4xn(0)x+x22n(0)x2, (13)

where z = (kTel / mc2) is the relativistic parameter for a free electron gas at temperature Tel. Equation (13) can be established using a kinetic theory formalism in which the drift term, usually present in the relativistic Boltzmann equation, is neglected. In that case, the photon occupation number is modified due to the Compton interactions included in the corresponding collision kernel [7].

In the present formalism, the varying electron velocities are expressed as

β¯Th=vc. (14)

The thermal SZE corresponds to a slight variation of Eq. (8) that reads:

n(p)(ν)=n(0)(ν)-τn(0)(ν)+τn(d)(ν), (15)

where n(d) (v) is the occupation number of the photons that contribute to a fixed perturbed frequency band, which is given by:

n(d)(ν)=-P(β¯Th)n(ν+β¯Thν)dβ¯Th. (16)

The Taylor expansion of n(ν+β¯Thν) up to second order in Δν=β¯Thν leads to the expression:

ndv-Pβ-Thn0+vβ-Thn0v+v2β-th222n0v2dβ-Th, (17)

or, using Eq. (4):

ndxn0-Pβ-Thdβ-Th+xn0x×-β-ThPβ-Thdβ-Th+x222n0x2×-β-Th2Pβ-Thdβ-Th. (18)

In Eq. (18) P(β¯Th) is assumed to be normalized, so that

-P(β¯Th)dβ¯Th=1. (19)

The first two moments of the distribution function lead to the Kompaneets equation structure. The coefficients corresponding to the right-hand side of Eq. (13) are:

-β¯ThP(β¯Th)dβ¯Th=4z, (20)

-β¯Th2P(β¯Th)dβ¯Th=2z. (21)

The distribution function in the 1D model is then given by:

P(β¯Th)=12πze-β¯Th24z+βπze-β¯Th24z, (22)

Eqs. (18) and (22) lead us to the perturbed occupation number, scaled in terms of the factor y = τz:

Δny=xex(4+x+ex(x-4))(ex-1)3. (23)

Figure 2 shows the perturbed occupation number, Eq. (23) for several temperatures.

Figure 2 Non-relativistic change in the occupation number Δn / y (Eq. 23). The red curve corresponds to T = 2:525 K, the green curve to T = 2:725 K and the blue curve to T = 2:925 K. 

At this point, Eqs. (18) and (22) can be applied in various interesting situations. In cosmology, for example, it is known that the unperturbed occupation number (1) may be slightly modified by the presence of a non-vanishing chemical potential μ, where -9 × 10-5μ ≤ 9 × 10-5. In this case, the change in the occupation number nμ reads:

Δnμ=yxex+μ(4+x+ex+μ(x-4))(ex+μ-1)3. (24)

Figure 3 shows the effect of this variable for T = 2.725 K to the change of the occupation number at μ = 0.

Figure 3 Normalized non-relativistic perturbed occupation number (Δn / Δn (μ = 0)) (Eq. 23). The red curve corresponds to μ = 9 × 10-5, the green line to μ = 0, and the blue curve to μ = -9 × 10-5

Another application of the present formalism is related to the study of other sources of distortions of the CMB curve, such as the DC scattering [10]. In this case, Eqs. (15) and (16) would require additional terms corresponding to the contributions to the band of frequency v due to the secondary photons produced in the effect [11]. A detailed calculation of this phenomenon is beyond the scope of the present paper, but will be the subject of future work since interdisciplinary situations in which populations are modified through “multiple births” can be described using kinetic formalisms such as the one here presented. The analogy of those kinds of situations with the one present in the DC effect seems quite promising.

It is also possible to apply Eq. (11) to establish the intensity distortion curve corresponding to the thermal SZE. The result reads:

ΔI(x)y=2(kT)3(hc)2x4ex(ex-1)2(xex+xex-1-4), (25)

Eq. (24) is the well-known expression for the thermal non-relativistic SZE . The distortion is shown in Fig. 2.

5. Final Remarks

This work has been devoted to the analysis of the SZE in terms of a simplified 1D kinetic model. One of the results here obtained is the establishment of a Kompaneets-type equation in which the coefficients of the derivative terms correspond to the first moments of the distribution function of the scatterers. Parity is a relevant feature to be considered in the structure of the distribution function, as was noticed in earlier work related to the SZE [8].

Figure 4 Normalized non-relativistic perturbed occupation number (Δn / Δn (μ = 0)) (Eq. 23). The red curve corresponds to μ = 9 × 10-5, the green line to μ = 0, and the blue curve to μ = -9 × 10-5

It is interesting to notice that the kinematic SZE is also compatible with the simplified kinetic approach here proposed. Indeed, if P(β¯)=δ(β¯-β) Eq.(16) becomes:

nd(x)=xn(0)x-β¯δ(β¯-β)dβ¯, (26)

which immediately leads to Eq. (10).

The SZE is a 3D phenomenon, which involves several physical processes present in ionized gases. In contrast, the present approach corresponds to a simple kinetic model that suggests the existence of a direct link between the diffusive-type formalisms and the use of scattering kernels. This type of formalism allows the direct calculation of perturbed occupation numbers for other physical systems. Further applications of the type of approach here presented will include relativistic effects, as well as multiple scattering scenarios in dense systems.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank A. Sandoval-Rubalcava and A.R. Sagaceta-Mejía for their contributions to this article. This work has been supported by the Institute of Technology and Applied Research (INIAT) of U. Iberoamericana, Mexico.

References

1. Y.B. Zel’dovich and R.A. Sunyaev, Astrophys. Space Sci. 4 (1969) 301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00661821 [ Links ]

2. S. Colafrancesco, P. Marchegiani and E. Palladino, Astronomy and Astrophysics 397 (2003) 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021199 [ Links ]

3. S. Colafrancesco, P. Marchegiani, M.S. Emritte, Astronomy and Astrophysics 595 (2016) A21. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424904 [ Links ]

4. Y. Rephaeli, Astrophys. J. 445 (1995) 33. [ Links ]

5. A. Sandoval-Villalbazo and R. Maartens, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 37 (2005) 1137-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-005-0096-x [ Links ]

6. J. Lavalle, C. Boehm, and J. Barthe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. P. 2010 (2010) 005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/02/005 [ Links ]

7. J. Bernstein and S. Dodelson, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 354. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.354 [ Links ]

8. A. Sandoval-Villalbazo and L.S. García-Colín, AIP Conf. Proc. 758 (2005) 170-175. [ Links ]

9. J. Chluba, S. Yu. Sazonov and R.A. Sunyaev, A& A 468 (2007) 785-795. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1900517 [ Links ]

10. F. Mandel and T.H.R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 215 (1952) 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1952.0227 [ Links ]

11. J. Chluba, Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background Dissertation, LMU München: (Fakultät für Physik, 2005). [ Links ]

Received: November 27, 2019; Accepted: January 27, 2020

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License