SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue5Foam injection into horizontal cells with channels of different openings author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de física

Print version ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.64 n.5 México Sep./Oct. 2018  Epub Nov 30, 2019

 

Research

Coupled reaction-diffusion waves in a chemical system via fractional derivatives in Liouville-Caputo sense

Khaled M. Saada  b 

J.F. Gómez-Aguilarc 

aDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Najran University, Saudi Arabia. ∗e-mail: khaledma sd@hotmail.com

bDepartment of Mathematics, College of Applied Science, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen.

cCONACyT-Tecnológico Nacional de México/CENIDET, Interior Internado Palmira S/N, Col. Palmira, 62490, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.∗∗e-mail: jgomez@cenidet.edu.mx


Abstract

In this paper, we have generalized the fractional cubic isothermal auto-catalytic chemical system (FCIACS) with Liouville-Caputo, Caputo- Fabrizio-Caputo, and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional time derivatives, respectively. We apply the Homotopy Analysis Transform Method (HATM) to compute the approximate solutions of FCIACS using these fractional derivatives. We study the convergence analysis of HATM by computing the residual error function. Also, we find the optimal values of h so we assure the convergence of the approximate solutions. Finally we show the behavior of the approximate solutions graphically. The results obtained are very effectiveness and accuracy. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 34A34, 35R11, 65M12, 26A33, 34A08, 35-XX.

Keywords: Fractional isothermal auto-catalytic chemical systems; HATM; Liouville-Caputo fractional derivative; Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative; Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative; h-curves

PACS: 02.30.Jr; 03.65.Fd; 04.20.Jb

1.Introduction

Travelling reaction-diffusion waves occur in many situations of interest in chemistry, biology, physics, engineering. In some cases, such waves are isolated events, travelling independently of other chemical processes. Many chemical systems exhibit chemical waves, i.e., reactants are converted into products as the front propagates through the reaction mixture, in which autocatalytic reaction couples with molecular diffusion to give constant waveform and constant velocity fronts 1-3.

In this paper we consider reaction-diffusion travelling waves that can be initiated in a coupled isothermal chemical system governed by cubic autocatalysis. We assumed that reactions take place along semipermeable membrane interfaces with the reaction on one interface (region I). The cubic isothermal, auto-catalytic reaction step in region (I) is given by

U+V2Vrate r1uv2, (1)

with the step of the linear decay

VWrate r2v, (2)

where u and v are the concentrations of the reactant U and auto-catalyst V, r 1 and r 2 are the rate constants and W is some inert product of reaction. The non-dimensional equations are given by

u1ξ=2u1ς2-u1v12+γu2-u1 (3)

v1ξ=2v1ς2+u1v12-kv1, (4)

u2ξ=2u2ς2-u2v22+γu1-u2, (5)

u2ξ=2u2ς2-u2v22 (6)

with the boundary conditions

limς±uiς,ξ=1           limς±v1ς,ξ=0 (7)

In the above equations we assume that cubic autocatalytic is only present in the other region II with the same rate r 1 . The two regions were considered to be coupled through a linear diffusive interchange of the auto-catalytic V. The parameters γ and k refer to the couple between the two regions and the strength of the auto-catalyst decay 4.

In fractional differentiation analysis, there are many different definitions of fractional derivatives. The Liouville- Caputo fractional derivative involve the convolution of the local derivative of a given function with power law function 5. Recently, Caputo and Fabrizio in 6, proposed a novel fractional derivative based on the exponential decay law with- out singularities 7-10. Atangana and Baleanu in 11, introduced a fractional derivative based in the Mittag-Leffler law (this function is of course the more generalized exponential function) and permits describe complex physical problems that follows at the same time the power and exponential de- cay law 12-14.

Many numerical methods for solving fractional differential equations have been developed over the past few years, such as homotopy analysis method, proposed by Liao, has been successfully applied to solving many problems in physics and engineering 15-18. The homotopy analysis method is based on construction of a homotopy which con- tinuously deforms an initial guess approximation to the exact solution of the given problem. Another powerful methods for finding exact solutions have been found in 19-24.

In this paper we obtain analytical approximate solutions to fractional cubic isothermal auto-catalytic chemical system model by applying Liouville-Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu fractional order derivatives in Liouville- Caputo sense using HATM.

2.Basic definitions

Fractional calculus unifies and generalizes the notions of integer-order differentiation. Now, we give some basic definitions and properties of FC theory.

Definition 1. The Liouville-Caputo operator (C) with order (α > 0) is defined as follows 5

C0Dθβ.=1Γm-β0θθ-tm-β-1Dm.dt,  m-1<βm, (8)

For N,t>0, fCμm,μ-1.

Definition 2. The Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order derivative in the Liouville-Caputo sense (CFC) with order (α > 0) is given by 6

CFC0Dθβ(.)=M(β)m-β×0θexp-βm-βθ-tDm.dt, m-1<βm, (9)

where M (β) is a constant of normalization that depend of β, which satisfies that, M (0) = M (1) = 1.

Definition 3. The Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative in the Liouville-Caputo sense (ABC) with order (α > 0) is de- fined as follows 11

ABC0Dθβ(.)=M(β)m-β0θEβ×-βm-βθ-tDm.dt, m-1<βm, (10)

Where

EβΞ=k=0ΞkΓβk+1

is the Mittag-Leffler function and M (β) = M (0) = M (1) =1.

If, 0 < β ≤ 1, then we define the Laplace trans- form for the Liouville-Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional derivatives, respectively as follows

L0CDξβuς,ξ=sβLuς,θ-k=0m-1u(k)ς,0+sβ-k-1, (11)

L0CFCDξβuς,ξ=M(β)×sLuς,ξs-u(ς,0)s+β(1-s) (12)

L0ABCDξβuς,ξ=M(β)×sβLuς,ξs-sβ-1u(ς,ξ)sβ1-β+β (13)

Considering these fractional order derivatives, we develop a new model FCIACS by replacing partial derivatives with respect to ξ by time fractional derivatives of order β.

Then the set of the Eqs. (3)-(6) become

0(.)Dξβu1=u1,ςς-u1v12+γu2-u1, (14)

0(.)Dξβu1=u1,ςς-u1v12-kv1 (15)

0(.)Dξβu2=u2,ςς-u2v22+γu1-u2 (16)

0(.)Dξβu2=u2,ςς-u2v22 (17)

where the operator 0(.)Dξβ can be of type Liouville-Caputo 0CDξβ, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo 0CFCDξβ, and Atangana- Baleanu-Caputo 0ABCDξβ time fractional derivatives with order β.

3.Solution of the problem

In this section, we apply the HATM 25-26 on FCIACS model. We take the initial conditions to satisfy the boundary conditions, namely

uiς,0=1-ai exp-ς2 (18)

uiς,0=b1 exp-ς2 (19)

Where i=1, 2.

As we know that HAM is based on a particular type of continuous mapping 27-32

u1ς,ξϕiς,ξ;ϱ,  viς,ξψiς,ξ;ϱ (20)

such that, as the embedding parameter q increases from 0 to 1; φi(ς, ξ; ), ψi(ς, ξ;) varies from the initial iteration to the exact solution.

Involving Eqs. (8)-(13) and 27-32 we can present the following nonlinear operators as

N1ϕ1ς,ξ;ϱ-1su1ς,0

-Ω.s,βLϕ1,ςςς,ξ,ϱ-ϕ1ς,ξ;ϱψ12ς,ξ;ϱ+γϕ2(ς,ξ;ϱ-ϕ1ς,ξ;ϱ,

M1ψ1ς,ξ;ϱ=Lψ1ς,ξ;ϱ

-1sv1ς,0-Ω.s,βLψ1,ςςς,ξ;ϱ-kψ1ς,ξ;ϱ+ϕ1ς,ξ;ϱψ12ς,ξ;ϱ,

N2ϕ2ς,ξ;ϱ=Lϕ2ς,ξ;ϱ

-1su2ς,0-Ω.s,βLϕ2,ςςς,ξ;ϱ-ϕ2ς,ξ;ϱψ22ς,ξ;ϱ+γϕ1ς,ξ;ϱ-ϕ2(ς,ξ;ϱ

M2ψ2ς,ξ;ϱ=Lψ2ς,ξ;ϱ-1sv2ς,0

-Ω(.)s,βLψ2,ςςς,ξ;ϱ+ϕ2ς,ξ;ϱψ22ς,ξ;ϱ (21)

where Ω.(s, β) can be of type Liouville-Caputo

Ω(C)s,β=1sβ,

Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo

ΩCFCs,β=β1-s+ssMβ

and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo

ΩABCs,β=β-1+s-β+1M(β)

Using the embedding parameter , we develop the following set of equations

1-ϱLϕiς,ξ;ϱ-ui,0ς,ξ=ϱhHς,ξNiϕiς,ξ;ϱ,

1-ϱLψiς,ξ;ϱ-vi,0ς,ξ=ϱhHς,ξMiψiς,ξ;ϱ (22)

with initial conditions

ϕiς,ξ;ϱ=ui,0ς,0,  ψiς,0;ϱ=vi,0ς,0  

where h ≠ 0 is the auxiliary parameter and H(ς, ξ) /= 0 is the auxiliary function.

Expanding in Taylor series φi(ς, ξ; ) and ψi(ς, ξ; ) with respect to ϱ, we get

ϕiς,ξ;ϱ=ui,0ς,ξ+j=1ui,jς,ξϱj,  ψiς,ξ;ϱ=vi,0ς,ξ+j=1vi,jς,ξϱj (23)

Where

ui,jς,ξ=1j!jϕiς,ξ;ϱϱj|ϱ=0,   vi,jς,ξ=1j!jψiς,ξ;ϱϱj|ϱ=0 (24)

If we let in Eq. (23), the series become

uiς,ξ=ui,0ς,ξ+j=1ui,jς,ξ,   viς,ξ=vi,0ς,ξ+j=1vi,jς,ξ (25)

Considering 25-26, the m th-order deformation equation is constructed of the following manner

Lui,jς,ξ-Xjuij-1ς,ξ=hHς,ξRj(.)ui,  Lvi,jς,ξ-Xjvij-1ς,ξ=hHς,ξRj(.)vi (26)

and

Xj={0if j1,1if j>1.

with initial conditions ui,jς,0=0 and vi,jς,0=0 for j >1

Rj(.)u1=Lu1,j-1ς,ξ-1su1ς,01-Xj-Ω.s,βLui,j-1,ςςς,t-u1,j-1ς,ξv1,j-12ς,ξ+γu2,j-1ς,ξ-u1,j-1ς,ξ,

Rj.v1=Lj-1v1,j-1ς,ξ-1sv1ς,01-Xj-Ω.s,βLv1,j-1,ςςς,ξ+u1,j-1ς,ξv1,(j-1)2ς,ξ-kv1,j-1ς,ξ.

Rj.u2=Lu2,j-1ς,ξ-1su2ς,01-Xj-Ω.s,βLu2,j-1,ςςς,t-u2,j-1ς,ξu2,j-12ς,ξ+γu1,j-1ς,ξ-u2,j-1ς,ξ,

Rj.v2=Lj-1v2,j-1ς,ξ-1sv2ς,01-Xj-Ω.s,βLv2,j-1,ςςς,ξ+u2,j-1ς,ξv2,(j-1)2ς,ξ (27)

Applying inverse Laplace transform, we have

ui,j=Xjui,(j-1)+hL-1Rj(.)ui,  vi,j=Xjvi,(j-1)+hL-1Rj(.)vi (28)

FIGURE 1 Plotting the h-curves for 5-terms of HATM solutions using the C, CFC and ABC operators with β = 0.7, k = 0.01, γ = 0.4, ς = 6, ξ = 0, a1 = 0.2, b1 = 0.1, a2 = 1 and b2 = 0.4. Solid line (C), Dotted line (CFC), and Dash - Dotted line (ABC) 

4.Numerical results

In this section we evaluate the first approximations for the Liouville-Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Atangana- Baleanu-Caputo operators respectively. The intervals of convergence obtained by the h-curves, the averaged residual error, and the residual error function were evaluated. Further- more, we will show the behavior of the HATM solutions for different values of fractional derivative β.

We take the initial approximation as

ui.0ς,ξ=ui,0ς,0,  vi,0ς,ξ=vi,0ς,0. (29)

For j = 1, we obtain the first approximation as following

ui,1(.)ς,ξ=hiL-1Lui,0ς,ξ-1suiς,01-X1-Ω(.)s,βLui,0,ςςς,ξ-ui,0ς,ξvi,02ς,ξ+-1iγu1,0ς,ξ-u2.0ς,ξ (30)

ui,1(.)ς,ξ=hiL-1Lui,0ς,ξ-1svς,01-Xj-Ω(.)s,βLvi,0,ςςς,ξ-2-ikv0ς,ξ+ui,0ς,ξvi,02ς,ξ (31)

We can obtain the first approximation via Liouville-Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operators, with ΩC (s, β), ΩCF C (s, β) and ΩABC (s, β), re- spectively.

And by the similar procedure we can evaluate the rest of the approximations. We therefore have HATM solutions of Eqs. (14)-(17)

ui,m(.)ς,ξ=ui,0ς,ξ+j=1mui,jς,ξnj (32)

FIGURE 2 Plotting the average residual error for 5-terms of HATM solutions using the Liouville-Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operators arranged from left to right with β = 0.7, 0 ≤ ς, ξ ≤ 10, k = 0.001, γ = 0.4, a1 = 0.002, b1 = 0.002, a2 = 0.001, b2 = 0.001. 

Figures 1(a)-(d) shows the numerical solutions for ui,ξ (ς, 0), vi,ξ (ς, 0) against h with β = 0.7 k = 0.01, γ = 0.4, ς = 6, ξ = 0, a1 = 0.2, b1 = 0.1, a2 = 1 and b2 = 0.4.

vi,m.ς,ξ=vi,0ς,ξ+j=1mvi,j(ς,ξ)nj (33)

We plot the h-curves of 5-terms of HATM solutions (32)-(33) with the aim to observe the intervals of convergence. In these figures, the straight line that parallels the h-axis provides the valid region of the convergence 30. Now, we compute the optimal values of the convergence-control parameters by the minimum of the averaged residual errors (33-38).

Euih=1Ξ+1Υ+1×s=0Ξj=0ΥNk=0mui,k10sΞ,10jΥ2, (34)

Evih=1Ξ+1Υ+1×s=0Ξj=0ΥMk=0mvi,k10sΞ,10jΥ2 (35)

FIGURE 3 Plotting the residual error functions for 4-terms of HATM solutions with β = 0.7, ξ = 20, k = 0.001, γ = 0.4, a1 = 0.002, b1 = 0.002, a2 = 0.001, b2 = 0.001. Solid line (C), Dotted line (CFC), and Dash - Dotted line (ABC). 

FIGURE 4 The plot of 4-terms of HATM solutions using LC, CFC and ABC operators with β = 0.4, k = 0.01, γ = 0.6, ξ = 15, a1 = 0.8, b1 = 1, a2 = 1, b2 = 0.9. Solid line (C), Dash line (CFC) and Dash-Dot-Dash line (ABC). 

FIGURE 5 The plot of 4-terms of HATM solutions using LC,CFC and ABC operators with β = 0.9, k = 0.01, γ = 0.6, ξ = 15, a1 = 0.8, b1 = 1, a2 = 1, b2 = 0.9. Solid line: (C), Dash line: (CFC), and Dash-Dot-Dash line:(ABC). 

corresponding to a nonlinear algebraic equations

dEui(h)dh=0,   dEvi(h)dh=0. (36)

Figure 2(a)-(d) and Tables I-II show the averaged residual error for the Liouville-Caputo (C), Caputo-Fabrizio- Caputo (CFC), and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) operators. These figures show the Eui (h) and Evi (h) for 4- terms obtained with HATM. Solutions we set into (34) - (35) Ξ = 10 and Υ = 10 with k = 0.001, γ = 0.4, a1 = 0.002, b1 = 0.002, a2 = 0.001 and b2 = 0.001. Using the command “Minimize” of Mathematica we plotting the residual error against h to get the optimal values h. From Fig. 2 and Tables I-II, we observe the average residual error of order 10−6 − 10−7. This observation assures that the HATM solutions for C, CFC and ABC are converging very rapidly. Figure 3(a)-(d) shows the residual errors functions with C, CFC and ABC operators for (14)-(15) at β = 0.7 It can be seen from these figures the order of REF are very small for all operators. Of Course, we can not say which the better?, due to the operators have a different kernel.

Finally we plot the HATM solutions for C, CFC and ABC fractional derivatives for different values of β. Figures 4-5 show the behavior of the new models with C, CFC and ABC operators for β = 0.4, and 0.9. From these figures, we noted that these new operators identical as the fractional order approaches from the integer order.

TABLE I The average residual error for 4-terms of HATM solutions with β = 0.7, 0 ≤ ς, ξ ≤ 10, k = 0.001, γ = 0.4, a1 = 0.002, b1 = 0.002, a2 = 0.001, b2 = 0.001, using the C, CFC and ABC operators, respectively. 

Operators Optimal value of hu1 Minimum of Eu1 (h)
C -0.011844 1.542 X 10-6
CFC - 0.055422 1.465 X 10-6
ABC - 0.0973563 5.431 X 10-7
Operators Optimal value of hv1 Minimum of Ev1 (h)
C -0.011811 1.542 X 10-6
CFC -0.055427 1.466 X 10-6
ABC -0.097383 5.438 X 10-7

TABLE II The average residual error for 5-terms of HATM solutions with β = 0.7, 0 ≤ ς, ξ ≤ 10, k = 0.001, γ = 0.4, a1 = 0.002, b1 = 0.002, a2 = 0.001, b2 = 0.001, using the C, CFC and ABC operators, respectively. 

Operators Optimal value of hu1 Minimum of Eu1 (h)
C -0. 011900 3.133 x 10-7
CFC - 0. 053997 3.486 x 10-7
ABC - 0. 096408 1.633 x 10-7
Operators Optimal value of hv1 Minimum of Ev1 (h)
C -0. 011807 3.834 X 10-7
CFC -0. 055014 3.592 X 10-7
ABC -0. 097085 1.432 X 10-7

5.Conclusion

In this paper, HATM was employed analytically to compute the approximate solutions of FCIACS using the Liouville- Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu- Caputo fractional derivatives. The interval of the convergence of HATM and optimal value of h were compute. Also the residual error functions were obtained. The order of the average residual error and residual error functions indicate that the approximations that have been calculated by HATM with C, CFC and ABC fractional derivatives to the accuracy and effectiveness of our results.

Acknowledgments

José Francisco Gómez Aguilar acknowledges the support provided by CONACyT: Cátedras CONACyT para jóvenes investigadores 2014. José Francisco Gómez Aguilar acknowledges the support provided by SNI-CONACyT.

References

1. S.K. Scott, K. Showalter, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 96 (1992) 8702-8711. [ Links ]

2. J.H. Merkin, D.J. Needham, In Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 430 (1990) 315-345. [ Links ]

3. J.H. Merkin , D.J. Needham , In Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 434 (1991) 531-554. [ Links ]

4. J.H. Merkin , D.J. Needham , S.K. Scott , IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 50 (1993) 43-76. [ Links ]

5. M. Caputo, F. Mainardi, Pure Appl. Geophys 91 (1971) 134- 147. [ Links ]

6. M. Caputo , M. Fabrizio, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1 (2015) 73-85. [ Links ]

7. A. Alsaedi, D. Baleanu, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Journal of Function Spaces 2016 (2016) 1-16. [ Links ]

8. N.A. Sheikh, F. Ali, M. Saqib, I. Khan, S.A.A. Jan, A.S. Al-shomrani, M.S. Alghamdi, Results in physics 7 (2017) 789-800. [ Links ]

9. J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 40 (2017) 179- 186. [ Links ]

10. M. Caputo , M. Fabrizio , Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl 2 (2016) 1- 11. [ Links ]

11. A. Atangana, D. Baleanu , Theory and Application to Heat Transfer Model. Therm Sci. 20 (2016) 763-769. [ Links ]

12. O.J.J. Algahtani, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 89 (2016) 552- 559. [ Links ]

13. S. Manjarekar, A.P. Bhadane, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl 3 (2017) 227-232. [ Links ]

14. A. Khan, K. Ali Abro, A. Tassaddiq, I. Khan , Entropy 19 (2017) 1-12. [ Links ]

15. M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 26 (2010) 448-479. [ Links ]

16. H. Jafari, S. Seifi, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 14 (2009) 2006-2012. [ Links ]

17. S. Abbasbandy, M.S. Hashemi, I. Hashim, Quaestiones Mathematicae 36 (2013) 93-105. [ Links ]

18. M. Zurigat, S. Momani, Z. Odibat, A. Alawneh, Applied Mathematical Modelling 34 (2010) 24-35. [ Links ]

19. R. Jain, K. Arekar, R. Shanker Dubey, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 38 (2017) 133-149. [ Links ]

20. M.S. Rawashdeh, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 40 (2017) 2362-2376. [ Links ]

21. A. Saadatmandi , Applied Mathematical Modelling 38 (2014) 1365-1372. [ Links ]

22. O.S. Iyiola, M.E. Soh, C.D. Enyi, Math. in Engr, Science and Aerospace 4 (2013) 105-116. [ Links ]

23. V.S. Ertürk, S. Momani , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 215 (2008) 142-151. [ Links ]

24. N.H. Sweilam, M.M. Khader, A.M.S. Mahdy, Journal of Fractional Calculus and Applications 2 (2012) 1-9. [ Links ]

25. D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 40 (2017) 5642-5653. [ Links ]

26. K.M. Saad, E.H. AL-Shareef, M.S. Mohamed, X.J. Yang, The European Physical Journal Plus 132 (2017) 1-11. [ Links ]

27. M.A. El-Tawil, S.N. Huseen, Int J Appl Math Mech 8 (2012) 51-75. [ Links ]

28. S.N. Huseen , S.R. Grace, M.A. El-Tawil , International Journal of Computers & Technology 11 (2013) 2859-2866. [ Links ]

29. S.-J. Liao, The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems PhD thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, (1992). [ Links ]

30. S.-J. Liao, Beyond perturbation: introduction to the homotopy analysis method. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, (2003). [ Links ]

31. ,M.S. Mohamed , Y.S. Hamed, Results in Physics 6 (2016) 20- 25. [ Links ]

32. K.M. Saad , A.A. AL-Shomrani, Journal of Fractional Calculus and Applications 7 (2016) 61-72. [ Links ]

33. S. Abbasbandy , M. Jalili, Numerical Algorithms 64 (2013) 593- 605. [ Links ]

34. M. Ghanbari, S. Abbasbandy, T. Allahviranloo, Appl. Comput. Math. 12 (2013) 355-364. [ Links ]

35. S.-J. Liao , Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 15 (2010) 2003-2016. [ Links ]

36. J. Singh , D. Kumar , R. Swroop, S. Kumar, Neural Computing and Applications 45 (2017) 192-204. [ Links ]

37. H.M. Srivastava, D. Kumar, J. Singh , Applied Mathematical Modelling 45 (2017) 192-204. [ Links ]

38. M. Yamashita, K. Yabushita, K. Tsuboi, J Phys A. Math. Gen 40 (2007) 8403-8416. [ Links ]

Received: April 19, 2018; Accepted: May 26, 2018

Competing interests.The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ contributions All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License