SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 suppl.3Elastic scattering of a proton-halo nucleus: 8B+58NiNuclear astrophysics from direct reactions índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de física

versão impressa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.54  supl.3 México Dez. 2008

 

Perspectives on nuclear mass formulae

 

J. Bareaª, A. Frankb, J.G. Hirschc, P. Van Isackerd, J.C. López–Vieyrae, J. Mendoza–Temisf, I. Moralesg, S. Pittelh and V. Velázquezi

 

ª Center for Theoretical Physics, Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520–8120, USA.

b Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–543 México, D.F. 04510, México.

c Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–543 México, D.F. 04510, México.

d Grand Accélérateur National d'Ions Lourds, CEA/DSM–CNRS/IN2P3, BP55027, F–14076 Caen Cedex 5, France.

e Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–543 México, D.F. 04510, México.

f Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–543, México, D.F. 04510, México.

g Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–543, México, D.F. 04510, México.

h Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.

i Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70–542, México, D.F. 04510, México.

 

Recibido el 7 de marzo de 2008
Aceptado el 27 de mayo de 2008

 

Abstract

We discuss different nuclear mass tables (experimental and calculated) in the context of the Garvey–Kelson relations and show how these relations can provide a very useful tool to test and improve the consistency of the models.

Keywords: Binding energies and masses.

 

Resumen

Se discuten las masas nucleares en el marco de las relaciones Garvey–Kelson y como usar esas relaciones para probar y mejorar la consistencia de modelos teóricos.

Descriptores: Energías de amarre y masas nucleares.

 

PACS:21.10.Dr

 

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

Acknowledgments

J.B. would like to thank the organizers for providing him the opportunity to present this work at the XXXIst Symposium on Nuclear Physics in Cocoyoc, México. He would also like to gratefully acknowledge the invitation and hospitality of the Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares (U.N.A.M.) and discussions with his collaborators, A. Frank, J. G. Hirsch, S. Pittel and P. Van Isacker. The authors also gratefully acknowledge very helpful discussions with A. Zuker. This work was supported by CONACYT (México), DGAPA (UNAM), and the U.S. National Science Foundation under grant # 0553127.

 

References

1. D. Lunney, J.M. Pearson, and C. Thibault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1021.        [ Links ]

2. C.E. Rolfs and W.S. Rodney, Cauldrons in the Cosmos (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988).        [ Links ]

3. Y–Z Qian, E. Rehm, H. Schatz, and F–K Thielemann, The r–Process: The Astrophysical Origin of the Heavy Elements and Related Rare Isotope Accelerator Physics Proceedings of the First Argonne/MSU/JINA/INT RIA Workshop (World Scientific, 2004).        [ Links ]

4. B–H Sun and J. Meng, Chinese Phys. Lett. 25 (2008) 2429.        [ Links ]

5. C.F. Von Weizsacker, Z. Phys. C 96 (1935) 431.        [ Links ]

6. P. Möller, J.R. Nix, W.D. Myers, and W.J. Swiatecki, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 59 (1995) 185.        [ Links ]

7. J. Duflo, Nucl. Phys. A 576 (1994) 29;         [ Links ] J. Duflo and A.P Zuker, Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995) R23.        [ Links ]

8. S. Goriely, M. Samyn, P.–H. Heenen, J.M. Pearson, and F. Tondeur, Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 024326;         [ Links ] M. Samyn, S. Goriely, P.–H. Heenen, J.M. Pearson, and F. Tondeur, Nucl. Phys. A 700 (2002) 142.        [ Links ]

9. G.T. Garvey, W.J. Gerace, R.L. Jaffe, I. Talmi, and I. Kelson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41 (1969) S1.        [ Links ]

10. J. Jänecke and P.J. Masson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 39 (1988) 265.        [ Links ]

11. G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A 729 (2003) 337.        [ Links ]

12. A. Frank et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 819 (2006) 151;         [ Links ] I. Morales, et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15 (2006) 1855;         [ Links ] A. Frank et al., Rev. Mex. Fis. S 52 (2006) 17;         [ Links ] A. Frank et al. AIP Conf. Proc. 884 (2007) 61.        [ Links ]

13. J. Barea et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 947 (2007) 348.        [ Links ]

14. G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A 595 (1995) 409.        [ Links ]

15. J. Mendoza–Temis et al. Nucl. Phys. A 799 (2008) 84.        [ Links ]

16. J. Barea, A. Frank, J.G. Hirsch, and P. Van Isacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 102501.        [ Links ]

17. J. Barea et al., Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 041304.        [ Links ]

18. G. Zaochun and Y.S. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 735;         [ Links ] G. Zaochun, C. Yong–Zhou and M. Jie, Chin. Phys. Lett. 18 (2001) 1186.        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons