SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.71 issue5Quality of health care and viral suppression among human immunodeficiency virus patientsClinical characteristics of primary extranodal versus nodal diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma: A retrospective cohort study in a cancer center author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de investigación clínica

On-line version ISSN 2564-8896Print version ISSN 0034-8376

Rev. invest. clín. vol.71 n.5 Ciudad de México Sep./Oct. 2019  Epub Apr 09, 2021

https://doi.org/10.24875/ric.19002995 

Original articles

Insulin-Like growth factor binding Protein-1, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and its relationship with fructose consumption in children with obesity

Anaisa G. Flores-Ramírez1 

Lorena del R. Ibarra-Reynoso1 

Hilda Lissete López-Lemus1 

Montserrat Olvera-Juárez1 

Claudia Luevano-Contreras1 

Ma. Eugenia Garay-Sevilla1  * 

1Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Health Science, University of Guanajuato, Campus León, Guanajuato, Mexico


ABSTRACT

Background

Over consumption of added sugar is associated with obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and insulin resistance (IR).

Objective

The objective of the study was to study the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and NAFLD and their relationship with fructose consumption in children with obesity.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out in children 6-11 years old with obesity. Anthropometric measurements, fructose consumption, glucose, lipid profile, insulin, and IGFBP-1 levels were evaluated; the homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was used. NAFLD was evaluated by ultrasound.

Results

We studied 83 children with a mean age of 9.2 ± 1.3 years. About 93% of the girls presented IR and lower levels of IGFBP-1 (p = 0.0001). The group with the lower levels of IGFBP-1 had higher HOMA-IR (p = 0.000002); IGFBP-1 was associated with fructose consumption (r = −0.25; p = 0.03), body mass index (BMI) (r=−0.42; p = 0.02), and HOMA-IR (r=−0.61; p = 0.002). About 81% of the children were classified as having mild or moderate/severe NAFLD, and these groups had higher HOMA-IR (p = 0.036) and fructose consumption (p = 0.0014).

Conclusions

The girls had more metabolic alterations. The group with lower levels of IGFBP-1 (hepatic IR) was associated with higher BMI, HOMA-IR, and fructose consumption; the group with higher severity of NAFLD showed higher HOMA-IR and fructose consumption.

Key words: Fructose intake; Children; Obesity; Insulin resistance; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of childhood obesity continues to grow worldwide1. Increased sugar consumption is considered to be a contributor to the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes and their associated cardiometabolic risks2. Overconsumption of added sugar is associated with obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and insulin resistance (IR)3-5. Some of these associations may be the result of hepatic de novo lipogenesis stimulation by dietary sugars6,7. Among added sugars, fructose is emerging as a potentially harmful component7,8. The intake of large amounts of fructose creates an unregulated source of carbon precursors for hepatic lipogenesis9, which contributes to the development of NAFLD10 and hepatic IR9,11. Hepatic IR is characterized by an inability of insulin to suppress glycogenesis and glycogenolysis, and it is closely associated with a dysfunction of the adipose tissue12. The liver has been shown to be the main site of production of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) in humans, which has been proposed as a hepatic insulin-resistance marker13,14. IGFBP-1 is unique among other hepatic insulin-resistance markers because it is regulated by insulin and predicts glucose tolerance worsening; moreover, it is less labile than insulin13,15. Since IGFBP-1 is inversely correlated with liver fat, it is independent of obesity. Hepatic fat accumulation is tightly linked to hepatic IR and is characterized by a decreased ability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose and triglyceride (TG)-rich, very-low-density-lipoprotein particle production in the liver14. On the other hand, one of the weaknesses of IGFBP-1 is that its reproducibility in serum, such as other indicators of IR, has been reported to decline with deteriorating glucose tolerance13. Previous research has shown that IGFPB-1 promotes the regeneration of β cells16 and that high levels of IGFBP-1 are associated with a reduction in diabetes risk15,17. Low serum IGFPB-1 levels have also been observed in obesity, hyperinsulinemic conditions18,19, and NAFLD conditions20. A previous study in children with obesity in our group showed that 73.1% had a high homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) and low IGFBP-1 levels, which could be an indication of whole-body IR and hepatic IR21.

Few studies have been conducted in children, and to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating hepatic IR, NAFLD, and fructose consumption in children with obesity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate IGFBP-1 (used as a marker of hepatic IR), NAFLD and their relationship with fructose consumption in children with obesity.

METHODS

Study design and population

A cross-sectional study was performed in children with obesity. Children 6-11 years old and attending schools in the city of Leon, Mexico, were invited to participate in the study. A total of 83 children with obesity, clinically healthy and without nutritional treatment were included. A sample size was calculated according to the correlation between IGFBP-1 and body mass index (BMI) found by Reinehr et al.22, considering a power of 80% and an alpha of two sides of 0.01, obtaining a sample size of 68 participants. However, it was decided to increase the sample size by 20%, and 83 participants were included.

Anthropometric measures such as weight, height, and waist circumference were taken using a Tanita HD-357 scale, a Seca 406 stadiometer, and a Lufkin measuring tape23. The weight and height were used to calculate BMI (weight/height2). Children were considered as having obesity if their BMI after adjustment for gender and age, were higher than the adult equivalent of 30 kg/m2, according to the international tables of Cole et al.24. Blood pressure was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer according to the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group25.

Biochemical measurements

A venous blood sample was obtained after 12 h of fasting to measure glucose by an enzymatic method (Lakeside, Mexico City, Mexico). TGs and cholesterol were also measured by the enzymatic method (Spinreact, Girona, Spain). Serum aliquots were stored at −80°C until the further determination of IGFPB-1, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Mediagnost, Reutlingen, Germany), and insulin, by radioimmunoassay (CisBio®). For IGFPB-1, only 68 samples were processed due to insufficient serum.

The intra- and inter-assay variation coefficients for IGFPB-1 were 6.2% and 7.4%, and for insulin, they were 2.7% and 5.8%, respectively. There are no studies defining cutoff values for IGFPB-1; therefore, for this study, a low IGFBP-1 level was considered as ≤ 6.67 ng/mL and a high level was > 6.67 ng/mL, according to our previous work21.

Whole IR was calculated with HOMA-IR according to Matthews et al.26, and children were classified as having IR according to cutoff values from previous work in Mexican population27. The TG/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol index (I-TG/HDL-C) was calculated, which is an indirect method for IR proposed by Quijada et al.28, and values > 2.0 were considered as a cardiovascular risk factor29.

Nutritional assessment

Each child completed a 24-h dietary recall (2 during the week and 1 on the weekend) with the help from their parents. Quantification of macronutrients (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) was carried out using the software Food Processor 2015®. The total fructose intake was calculated according to the fructose of foods, called free fructose, and the fructose released from sucrose during digestion, using the formula (total fructose = free fructose [g/day] + 1/2 free sucrose [g/day])30. Additional analysis by food groups rich in fructose was carried out to detect which one had a major contribution to total fructose intake. The food groups analyzed were five: vegetables, fruit, 100% fruit juice, sugar-sweetened foods, and sugar-sweetened beverages30. Once the results were obtained, the average consumption was calculated from the three dietary recalls.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of NAFLD

NAFLD was assessed by ultrasound using a General Electric Logic 400 MD (General Electric, Boston, MA, USA) with a convex transducer of 3.6 MHz. The ultrasonographic evaluation was done in a blinded manner by two experienced radiologists, and in the event of contradictory results, a third evaluation was requested from another radiologist. Different degrees of fatty infiltration were considered: (a) light, when an increase was observed in echogenicity and hepatomegaly; (b) moderate, when sound attenuation was added; and (c) severe, when the walls of portal vessels and diaphragm were not visible31. Finally, the intra-operator reliability of NAFLD measurements was excellent for three operators, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.87), and inter-operator reliability was good, with ICC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.78-0.70).

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Institutional Committee for Bioethics in Research of the University of Guanajuato (CIBIUG) (CIBIUG-P03-2016), and if both the child and the parent or tutor agreed to participate, they signed informed consent.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for data with a normal distribution are presented as mean and standard deviation and the data without normal distribution as median and ranges. A Student’s t-test or a Mann–Whitney U-test was used for the difference between groups. For the differences between the degrees of NAFLD, an analysis of variance or Kruskal–Wallis test with a post hoc Tukey test was performed, and to carry out the statistical analysis according to the degree of hepatic steatosis, the children with moderate and severe NAFLD were grouped together, since the latter group only had nine children. A Spearman correlation test was used to determine the association between variables. In addition, a multiple regression analysis using the IGFBP-1 as a dependent variable and the significant variables from the correlation analysis as regressors were used. Listwise deletion of missing data was used for the multiple regression analysis. With respect to the ultrasonographic diagnosis of NAFLD, inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated using an ICC. The software Statistica 7.0 for Windows (StatSoft, Tucson, AZ) was used for all the analyses, and a value of p < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

A total of 83 children were studied with a mean age of 9.2 ± 1.3 years; 48.2% were male and 51.8% were female. About 93% of the girls presented IR, and 72.1% had a TG/HDL-C index > 2. The main contributor to fructose intake was the sugar-sweetened beverages group, with 42.75 ± 19.72 g/day; it was followed by the sugar-sweetened foods group, with 14.56 ± 9.39 g/day; the fruit group, with 4.69 ± 5.52 g/day; and finally, the vegetables and natural juices groups, with < 1.0 g/day.

Table 1 shows a comparison by gender for general and metabolic characteristics; the girls showed greater waist circumference (p = 0.002), TGs (p = 0.009), VLDL (p = 0.01), HOMA-IR (p = 0.00001), and TG/HDL-C index (p = 0.012), and they had lower IGFBP-1 levels (p = 0.0001). No significant differences were found in fructose intake from the food groups analyzed (results not shown).

Table 1 Comparison of variables between the female and male gender 

Variable Gender Value t/Z* p

Male (n = 40) Female (n = 43)
Age (years)* 9 (6-11) 9 (6-11) 0.59 0.55
BMI (Kg/m2) 26.2 ± 2.5 26.9 ± 2.5 1.28 0.20
Waist circumference (cm) 84.9 ± 7.2 90.0 ± 7.4 3.16 0.002
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 95 (80-115) 90 (80-120) 0.11 0.91
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 60 (50-80) 60 (50-85) 0.73 0.47

Metabolic Variables

Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.44 ± 0.47 1.77 ± 0.64 2.7 0.009
Total-Cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.17 ± 0.66 4.37 ± 0.70 1.29 0.20
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.46 ± 0.21 1.44 ± 0.19 −0.56 0.58
VLDL (mmol/L) 0.65 ± 0.22 0.8 ± 0.3 2.58 0.01
LDL (mmol/L) 2.0 ± 0.53 2.12 ± 0.67 0.89 0.37
Glucose (mmol/L) 4.97 ± 0.52 4.94 ± 0.50 −0.28 0.78
Insulin (µIU/mL)* 1.55 (0.60-5.04) 2.41 (0.81-5.01) 4.65 0.00001
HOMA-IR* 2.3 (0.9-8.2) 3.7 (1.1-8.5) 4.46 0.00001
IGFBP-1 (ng/ml)* 3.71 (0.16-23.9) 0.91 (0.06-8.81) −3.82 0.0001
Triglyceride/HDL-C index 2.3 ± 0.83 2.9 ± 1.2 2.57 0.012

Dietetic Variables

Energy (Kcal/day) 2315.6 ± 539.0 2174.5 ± 479.1 −1.26 0.21
Protein (g/day) 82.3 ± 20.2 78.0 ± 16.9 −1.03 0.30
Lipids (g/day) 86.2 ± 25.6 74.1 ± 20.4 −2.39 0.019
Carbohydrates (g/day) 310.7 ± 71.3 306.6 ± 77.1 −0.25 0.80
Total fructose (g/day) 61.8 ± 19.9 65.5 ± 21.9 0.82 0.41
Fructose Density (g/Kcal) 0.027 ± 0.007 0.03 ± 0.006 −2.07 0.042

The variables with normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD and the variables that did not follow normal distribution

*were reported as median (range). BMI: body mass index, HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, IGFBP-1: insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein.

Table 2 shows the comparison of metabolic variables according to low or high IGFBP-1 levels. The group with low IGFPB-1 was older (p = 0.008) and had higher BMI (p = 0.00002) and waist circumference (p < 0.0001), as well as higher HOMA-IR (p < 0.0001). In relation to dietary variables, a higher energy consumption (p = 0.012), carbohydrates (p = 0.051) and total fructose intake (p = 0.022) were found in the group with low IGFPB-1. No significant differences were found in fructose intake from the food groups analyzed (results not shown).

Table 2 Comparison of variables according to the low or high serum level of IGFBP-1 

Variable IGFBP-1 Value t/Z* p

Low (<6.66) (n = 51) High (≥6.67) (n = 17)
Age (years)* 10 (6-11) 8.0 (6-11) 2.66 0.008
BMI (Kg/m2) 27.2 ± 2.4 24.3 ± 1.5 4.62 0.00002
Waist circumference (cm) 89.6 ± 6.9 80.4 ± 4.8 5.09 0.000003
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 95 (80-120) 90.0 (80-105) 1.52 0.12
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 60.0 (50-85) 60.0 (50-80) 1.49 0.13

Metabolic variables

Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.63 ± 0.65 1.48 ± 0.53 0.86 0.39
Total-Cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.27 ± 0.72 4.32 ± 0.56 -0.27 0.79
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.45 ± 0.21 1.45 ± 0.21 -0.11 0.90
VLDL (mmol/L) 0.73 ± 0.3 0.67 ± 0.24 0.86 0.39
LDL (mmol/L) 2.08 ± 0.57 2.02 ± 0.55 -0.36 0.72
Glucose (mmol/L) 4.96 ± 0.48 4.92 ± 0.49 0.22 0.82
Insulin (µIU/mL) * 2.06 (0.94-5.01) 0.99 (0.6-2.06) 4.95 0.000001
HOMA-IR * 3.0 (1.1-8.4) 1.5 (0.9-3.0) 4.77 0.000002
Triglyceride/HDL-C index 2.6 ± 1.2 2.4 ± 0.95 0.80 0.43

Dietetic variables

Energy (Kcal/day) 2321.4 ± 508.1 1963.1 ± 452.2 2.58 0.012
Protein (g/day) 80.6 ± 18.5 73.3 ± 17.5 1.42 0.16
Lipids (g/day) 82.5 ± 23.4 70.7 ± 21.6 1.84 0.07
Carbohydrates (g/day) 322.6 ± 75.8 264.3 ± 58.5 2.89 0.0051
Total fructose (g/day) 67.5 ± 23.1 53.4 ± 15.4 2.34 0.022
Fructose Density (g/Kcal) 0.029 ± 0.006 0.028 ± 0.008 0.47 0.641

The variables with normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD and the variables that did not follow normal distribution

*were reported as median (range). BMI: body mass index, HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, IGFBP-1: insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein.

In the total group, 81% had NAFLD in its different levels (light 34% and moderate/severe 47%). The group with moderate/severe NAFLD had higher BMI (p = 0.009), waist circumference (p = 0.046), insulin (p = 0.022), HOMA-IR (p = 0.036), carbohydrates intake (p = 0.005), total fructose intake (p = 0.001) (Fig. 1), and higher fructose intake from sugar sweetened beverages (p = 0.007). In this group, we also found lower levels of IGFBP-1, but these were not statistically significant (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of variables according to the NAFLD degree 

Variable Normal (n = 16) Mild (n = 28) Moderate/Severe (n = 39) F/H* p
Age (years)* 8.5 (6-11) 9.0 (6-11) 10 (7-11) 3.7 0.15
BMI (Kg/m2) 25.7 ± 1.9 25.9 ± 2.5 27.4 ± 2.4 4.1 0.009a,b
Waist circumference (cm) 84.4 ± 6.9 86.2 ± 7.8 89.9 ± 7.3 2.8 0.046c
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 90 (80-110) 90 (80-110) 90 (85-120) 3.8 0.49
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)* 60 (50-75) 60 (50-75) 60 (50-85) 4.6 0.09
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.49 ± 0.61 1.64 ± 0.72 1.64 ± 0.47 1.1 0.35
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) 3.99 ± 0.50 4.32 ± 0.63 4.35 ± 0.77 1.9 0.12
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.36 ± 0.22 1.46 ± 0.19 1.47 ± 0.20 1.6 0.19
VLDL (mmol/L) 0.67 ± 0.28 0.75 ± 0.33 0.75 ± 0.22 0.41 0.66
LDL (mmol/L) 1.79 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.56 2.14 ± 0.66 2.07 0.13
Glucose (mmol/L) 4.87 ± 0.52 5.00 ± 0.48 4.96 ± 0.53 0.5 0.68
Insulin (µIU/mL)* 1.28 (0.60-5.01) 1.86 (0.76-4.32) 2.03 (0.81-5.04) 7.7 0.022
HOMA-IR* 1.9 (0.90-7.8) 2.9 (1.20-6.8) 3.0 (1.2-8.5) 6.6 0.036d
IGFBP-1 (ng/ml)* 2.6 (0.16-18.6) 2.5 (0.6-15.7) 1.5 (0.11-23.9) 1.63 0.44
Triglyceride/HDL-C index 2.6 ± 1.2 2.6 ± 1.2 2.6 ± 0.9 0.5 0.67
Energy (Kcal/day) 2110 ± 424 2077 ± 452 2416 ± 537 3.9 0.012e
Protein (g/day) 78 ± 20 76 ± 16 84 ± 19 1.9 0.12
Lipids (g/day) 72 ± 20 76 ± 20 87 ± 26 2.1 0.10
Carbohydrates (g/day) 297 ± 74 281 ± 70 333 ± 70 4.7 0.005f
Total fructose (g/day) 58 ± 16 54 ± 16 73 ± 22 5.7 0.0014g
Fructose Density (g/Kcal) 0.028 ± 0.006 0.026 ± 0.007 0.031 ± 0.007 2.4 0.07
Food groups
Vegetables (g/day) 0.78 (0-5.23) 0.37 (0-1.89) 0.54 (0-1.74) 1.4 0.16
Fruit (g/day) 5.13 (0-34.8) 5.41 (0-17.4) 6.67 (0-27.1) 0.3 0.76
100% fruit juices (g/day) 1.16 (0-10.93) 1.78 (0-21.87) 1.28 (0-32.8) −0.8 0.45
Sugar sweetened beverages (g/day) 43.5 ± 29.8 38.1 ± 16.5 54.9 ± 20.5 5.32 0.007h
Sugar sweetened foods (g/day) 26.2 ± 18.2 24.7 ± 18.9 26.6 ± 17.0 0.09 0.91

The variables with normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD and the variables that did not follow normal distribution

*were reported as median (ranges). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Significantly differences

a:None versus moderate and severe, p < 0.041,

b:Mild versus moderate and severe, p < 0.032,

c:None versus moderate and severe, p < 0.038,

d:None versus moderate and severe, p < 0.029,

e:Mild versus moderate and severe, p < 0.02,

f:Slight versus moderate and severe, p < 0.009,

g:None versus moderate and severe, p < 0.031,

h:Slight versus moderate and severe, p < 0.006. BMI: body mass index, HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, IGFBP-1: insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein.

Figure 1 Comparison of fructose consumption according to the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) degree. (1): none; (2): light; (3): moderate and severe NAFLD. NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. 

Negative correlations were found between IGFBP-1 and BMI (r = −0.42; p = 0.02), HOMA-IR (r = −0.61; p = 0.002), and total fructose intake (r= −0.25; p = 0.03).

The multiple regression analysis is presented in Table 4: IGFBP-1 was found to be associated with BMI, HOMA-IR, and total fructose intake (R2 = 0.41; F = 10.75 p < 0.0001), and this association persisted after adjustment by gender (R2 = 0.11; F = 10.75 p < 0.0001).

Table 4 Association of the IGFBP-1 serum levels 

Dependent variable Independent variables Beta ± SE t p
R = 0.64; R2 = 0.41; F = 10.75; p < 0.00001
IGFBP-1 (n = 68) BMI −0.57 ± 0.22 −2.55 0.013
HOMA-IR −0.67 ± 0.33 −2.02 0.047
Fructose consumption −0.05 ± 0.02 −2.05 0.044
Gender −2.9±1.12 −2.60 0.012

BMI: body mass index, HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, IGFBP-1: insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1.

DISCUSSION

In Mexico, obesity is an important public health problem. The National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016 reported that the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity in children between 5 and 11 years was 33.2%. The obesity prevalence in girls was 12.2% and 18% in boys. In the past decades, high fructose intake has been associated with increased risk of obesity development and the consequent metabolic and inflammatory diseases3,32. Liver function is particularly vulnerable to an increasing fructose intake since this organ is responsible for approximately 90% of the total metabolism of this sugar33. The liver has also been found to be the main site of production of IGFBP-1 in humans, a marker of hepatic IR. However, few studies related to these markers have been conducted in children and none, to the best of our knowledge that evaluates hepatic IR, NAFLD, and fructose consumption in children with obesity. In this study, we evaluated school-age children and found that in the group with low levels of IGFBP-1, the children showed higher levels of IR and HOMA-IR, and IGFBP-1 showed a negative association with HOMA-IR. These results suggest that higher hepatic IR is present with higher whole IR. Similar results have been found by other authors in elderly men18 and nondiabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis34. An explanation for these results may be found in recent studies that proposed that IGFBP-1 promotes the regeneration of β-cells15, re-establishing the pancreatic function while the total IR persists or worsens. Reports from animal studies indicate that obesity is associated with the suppression of the hepatic expression of mRNA of IGFBP-1 and a marked reduction of total concentrations of circulating IGFBP-135.

In our study, the group with lower levels of IGFBP-1 had a higher consumption of carbohydrates and total fructose, and in the multivariate analysis, IGFBP-1 showed a negative association with fructose consumption. In this sense, the liver is the primary site of de novo lipogenesis, the process by which fatty acids are synthesized from dietary precursors, predominantly carbohydrates36. Excessive fructose consumption may also have significant effects on lipid metabolism, contributing both to steatosis and to increased circulating TG levels by means of the inhibition of the enzyme carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A2. Changes in IGFBPs have been correlated with some metabolic syndrome (Mets) components, and predominantly with obesity37,38. Reinehr et al.22 found that IGFBP-1 correlated significantly with most of the Mets components (waist circumference, TGs, and HOMA-IR). Similar results were found in our group of children with obesity.

In our study group, 81% of the children showed NAFLD at levels (light 34%, and moderate/severe 47%) higher than those found in previous studies in our group (42.5%)21. These children also had higher BMI and larger waist circumference; similar results were found in children from the general population and studies based on child obesity clinics, although the prevalence was lower39. The children with moderate/severe NAFLD showed higher HOMA-IR, which could be explained by reports that hyperinsulinemia leads to de novo lipogenesis, which is partially responsible for the accumulation of TGs in the hepatocytes and the development of steatosis40. However, the mechanisms by which high-fructose feeding cause’s hyperinsulinemia and IR remain uncertain2. Fructose-induced steatosis may contribute to hepatic IR through increased hepatic diacylglycerol accumulation, protein kinase C activation, and impairment of insulin-mediated Akt2 activation41,42. However, whether steatosis itself can cause hepatic IR remains controversial43,44. In our study, higher consumption of carbohydrates and fructose observed in the group with moderate/severe NAFLD was similar to other studies6,10,45. High carbohydrates intake exceeding the energetic requirements and above the liver storage capacity in the form of glycogen, are converted into fatty acids to be stored as triacylglycerol, leading to NAFLD46. On the other hand, a meta-analysis indicated that consumption of fructose has more damaging effects on the hepatic insulin sensitivity than does the isocaloric consumption of carbohydrates4.

Likewise, Gugliucci47 state that approximately 90% of fructose intake is metabolized in the liver, while a large part of the glucose consumed passes through the liver and finds its way to skeletal muscle, where it degrades to CO2, H2O, and adenosine triphosphate, and to the adipose tissue, where it is converted into phosphate glycerol for the synthesis of TGs and production of energy. Therefore, it is undeniable that in this multi-factorial pathology of NAFLD, elevated consumption of carbohydrates, especially fructose, is a major risk factor for its development.

A previous study in children by our group showed that the restriction of high-fructose foods with a decrease in caloric and carbohydrate intake, at 6 weeks induced a decrease of TG levels and hepatic steatosis48. In the present study, the group of children without steatosis and the group with mild steatosis had similar fructose intake; besides, they had similar metabolic and anthropometric characteristics. An explanation to these similarities could be that ultrasound is not sensitive enough to detect mild states of steatosis49.

It is important to highlight that our results show that girls have higher levels of TGs, HOMA-IR, I-TG/HDL, and lower IGFBP-1; all of them considered cardiovascular risk factors. A possible explanation is that girls had higher fructose consumption, which contributed to the development of hepatic IR, total IR, and higher TGs which could put them at higher risk of developing cardiometabolic diseases in early adulthood; thus, it is important to evaluate all of these risk factors from an early age.

This study had several weaknesses. First, the small sample size and that only 68 samples of IGFBP-1 were processed due to insufficient serum; also, the transversal nature of the study which did not allow us to evaluate causality; and finally, the use of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for steatosis. Ultrasound detects fatty liver disease in patients with moderate and high-fat content but is limited in patients with low-fat content49. Furthermore, conventional ultrasound signs may be operator-dependent and subjective, although the intra- and inter-observer agreement in our study was good to excellent.

The group with lower levels of IGFBP-1 (marker of hepatic IR) was associated with BMI, HOMA-IR, and fructose consumption after adjustment by gender; the group with higher severity of NAFLD showed higher HOMA-IR and fructose consumption, and the metabolic alterations were more evident in females (higher TGs, HOMA-IR, and lower IGFBP-1). These results support the importance to evaluate children to prevent the development of chronic diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the CONACYT (GTO-2012-C03-195255) and the University of Guanajuato (DAIP-2015) grants.

REFERENCES

1. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic:shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378:804-14. [ Links ]

2. Hannou SA, Haslam DE, McKeown NM, Herman MA. Fructose metabolism and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:545-55. [ Links ]

3. Bray GA, Popkin BM. Dietary sugar and body weight:have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes?Health be damned!Pour on the sugar. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:950-6. [ Links ]

4. Ter Horst KW, Schene MR, Holman R, Romijn JA, Serlie MJ. Effect of fructose consumption on insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects:a systematic review and meta-analysis of diet-intervention trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104:1562-76. [ Links ]

5. Lim JS, Mietus-Snyder M, Valente A, Schwarz JM, Lustig RH. The role of fructose in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:251-64. [ Links ]

6. Diraison F, Yankah V, Letexier D, Dusserre E, Jones P, Beylot M, et al. Differences in the regulation of adipose tissue and liver lipogenesis by carbohydrates in humans. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:846-53. [ Links ]

7. Herman MA, Samuel VT. The sweet path to metabolic demise:fructose and lipid synthesis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016;27:719-30. [ Links ]

8. Ter Horst KW, Serlie MJ. Fructose consumption, lipogenesis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrients. 2017;9:e981. [ Links ]

9. Schwarz JM, Noworolski SM, Wen MJ, Dyachenko A, Prior JL, Weinberg ME, et al. Effect of a high-fructose weight-maintaining diet on lipogenesis and liver fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:2434-42. [ Links ]

10. Vos MB, Lavine JE. Dietary fructose in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2013;57:2525-31. [ Links ]

11. Aeberli I, Hochuli M, Gerber PA, Sze L, Murer SB, Tappy L, et al. Moderate amounts of fructose consumption impair insulin sensitivity in healthy young men:a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:150-6. [ Links ]

12. Samuel VT, Shulman GI. Mechanisms for insulin resistance:common threads and missing links. Cell. 2012;148:852-71. [ Links ]

13. Borai A, Livingstone C, Heald AH, Oyindamola Y, Ferns G. Delta insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (ΔIGFBP-1):a marker of hepatic insulin resistance?. Ann Clin Biochem. 2014;51:269-76. [ Links ]

14. Kotronen A, Lewitt M, Hall K, Brismar K, Yki-Järvinen H. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 as a novel specific marker of hepatic insulin sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4867-72. [ Links ]

15. Lewitt MS, Hilding A, Ostenson CG, Efendic S, Brismar K, Hall K, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in the prediction and development of Type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Swedish men. Diabetologia. 2008;51:1135-45. [ Links ]

16. Lu J, Liu KC, Schulz N, Karampelias C, Charbord J, Hilding A, et al. IGFBP1 increases β-cell regeneration by promoting α- to β-cell transdifferentiation. EMBO J. 2016;35:2026-44. [ Links ]

17. Lewitt MS, Hilding A, Brismar K, Efendic S, Ostenson CG, Hall K, et al. IGF-binding protein 1 and abdominal obesity in the development of Type 2 diabetes in women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163:233-42. [ Links ]

18. Harrela M, Koistinen R, Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A, SeppäläM. Low serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 is associated with an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile in elderly men. Ann Med. 2000;32:424-8. [ Links ]

19. Yu H, Rohan T. Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1472-89. [ Links ]

20. Graffigna M, Belli S, Larrañaga G, Fainboim H, Estepo C, Peres S, et al. La proteína transportadora del factor de crecimiento insulínico Tipo 1:Un nuevo marcador para la enfermedad hepática grasa no alcohólica?. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2009;39:30-7. [ Links ]

21. Ibarra-Reynoso Ldel R, Pisarchyk L, Pérez-Luque EL, Garay-Sevilla ME, Malacara JM. Whole-body and hepatic insulin resistance in obese children. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113576. [ Links ]

22. Reinehr T, Kleber M, Toschke AM, Woelfle J, Roth CL. Longitudinal association between IGFBP-1 levels and parameters of the metabolic syndrome in obese children before and after weight loss. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:236-43. [ Links ]

23. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Anthropometry Procedures Manual;2007. Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_07_08/manual_an.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb]. [ Links ]

24. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide:international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240-3. [ Links ]

25. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114:555-76. [ Links ]

26. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC, et al. Homeostasis model assessment:insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412-9. [ Links ]

27. Aradillas-García C, Rodríguez-Morán M, Garay-Sevilla ME, Malacara JM, Rascon-Pacheco RA, Guerrero-Romero F, et al. Distribution of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in Mexican children and adolescents. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:301-6. [ Links ]

28. Quijada Z, Paoli M, Zerpa Y, Camacho N, Cichetti R, Villarroel V, et al. The triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio as a marker of cardiovascular risk in obese children;association with traditional and emergent risk factors. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9:464-71. [ Links ]

29. Yoo DY, Kang YS, Kwon EB, Yoo EG. The triglyceride-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in overweight Korean children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;22:158-63. [ Links ]

30. Pollock NK, Bundy V, Kanto W, Davis CL, Bernard PJ, Zhu H, et al. Greater fructose consumption is associated with cardiometabolic risk markers and visceral adiposity in adolescents. J Nutr. 2012;142:251-7. [ Links ]

31. Mittelstaedt CA. General Ultrasound. 1st ed. New York:Churchill Livingstone;1992. [ Links ]

32. Campos VC, Tappy L. Physiological handling of dietary fructose-containing sugars:implications for health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40 Suppl 1:S6-11. [ Links ]

33. Tappy L, LêKA. Metabolic effects of fructose and the worldwide increase in obesity. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:23-46. [ Links ]

34. Bernardo AP, Oliveira JC, Santos O, Carvalho MJ, Cabrita A, Rodrigues A, et al. Insulin resistance in nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients:associations with body composition, peritoneal transport, and peritoneal glucose absorption. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:2205-12. [ Links ]

35. Rajwani A, Ezzat V, Smith J, Yuldasheva NY, Duncan ER, Gage M, et al. Increasing circulating IGFBP1 levels improves insulin sensitivity, promotes nitric oxide production, lowers blood pressure, and protects against atherosclerosis. Diabetes. 2012;61:915-24. [ Links ]

36. Hellerstein MK, Schwarz JM, Neese RA. Regulation of hepatic de novo lipogenesis in humans. Annu Rev Nutr 1996;16:523-57. [ Links ]

37. Aguirre GA, De Ita JR, de la Garza RG, Castilla-Cortazar I. Insulin-like growth factor-1 deficiency and metabolic syndrome. J Transl Med. 2016;14:3. [ Links ]

38. Lewitt MS, Dent MS, Hall K. The insulin-like growth factor system in obesity, insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Med. 2014;3:1561-74. [ Links ]

39. Anderson EL, Howe LD, Jones HE, Higgins JP, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, et al. The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents:a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140908. [ Links ]

40. Browning JD, Horton JD. Molecular mediators of hepatic steatosis and liver injury. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:147-52. [ Links ]

41. Nagai Y, Yonemitsu S, Erion DM, Iwasaki T, Stark R, Weismann D, et al. The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 beta in the pathogenesis of fructose-induced insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009;9:252-64. [ Links ]

42. Kumashiro N, Erion DM, Zhang D, Kahn M, Beddow SA, Chu X, et al. Cellular mechanism of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16381-5. [ Links ]

43. Benhamed F, Denechaud PD, Lemoine M, Robichon C, Moldes M, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. The lipogenic transcription factor chREBP dissociates hepatic steatosis from insulin resistance in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2176-94. [ Links ]

44. Farese RV Jr., Zechner R, Newgard CB, Walther TC. The problem of establishing relationships between hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2012;15:570-3. [ Links ]

45. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Havel PJ. Adverse metabolic effects of dietary fructose:Results from the recent epidemiological, clinical, and mechanistic studies. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2013;24:198-206. [ Links ]

46. Cascales M. Lipogénesis de novo y Termogénesis. Available from:http://www.analesranf.com/index.php/mono/article/download/1571/1655. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb]. [ Links ]

47. Gugliucci A. Formation of fructose-mediated advanced glycation end products and their roles in metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:54-62. [ Links ]

48. Ibarra-Reynoso LD, López-Lemus HL, Garay-Sevilla ME, Malacara JM. Effect of restriction of foods with high fructose corn syrup content on metabolic indices and fatty liver in obese children. Obes Facts. 2017;10:332-40. [ Links ]

49. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim MY, Kim DY, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis:prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol. 2010;52:579-85. [ Links ]

Received: February 13, 2019; Accepted: May 22, 2019

* Corresponding author: Ma. Eugenia Garay-Sevilla 20 de Enero, 929 Col. Obregón C.P. 37000, León, Guanajuato, México E-mail: marugaray_2000@yahoo.com

These authors contributed equally to this study.

Creative Commons License Revista de Investigación Clínica. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license