SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.71 número2Frequency of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Mexican Patients with Rheumatic Diseases Determined by Self-Administered Questionnaires Adapted to the Spanish Language índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de investigación clínica

versión On-line ISSN 2564-8896versión impresa ISSN 0034-8376

Rev. invest. clín. vol.71 no.2 Ciudad de México mar./abr. 2019  Epub 12-Abr-2021

https://doi.org/10.24875/ric.18002754 

Perspectives

Clinical and Biomedical Applications of Surface Plasmon Resonance Systems

David E. Meza-Sánchez1 

José L. Maravillas-Montero1  * 

1Red de Apoyo a la Investigación, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, México


Abstract

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based biosensors offer superior analytical features such as simplicity, sensitivity, and specificity when compared to conventional methods in clinical analyses. In addition, they deliver real-time monitoring of label-free analytes with high-throughput approaches requiring little sample pretreatment that allows the analysis of virtually every clinical sample type to determine the amount and/or activity of any molecule of interest. Accordingly, SPR emerges as a novel, efficient, powerful, and relatively low-cost alternative tool for routine clinical analysis, opening also new horizons for developments in personalized medicine applied to diagnostics or therapeutics’ monitoring.

Key words Surface plasmon resonance; Biomarker; Clinical diagnostics

INTRODUCTION

Biosensors are analytical devices consisting of a biological sensing element connected to a physicochemical transducer. These elements generate digital electronic signals proportional to the interaction of biomolecules, thus allowing “label-free” detection of analytes. Due to the specificity of biomolecular interactions, a biosensor can be used to analyze complex substrates including samples such as blood, serum, plasma, urine, milk, and culture media often with minimum preparative treatment.

Different types of biosensors have been developed including amperometric, potentiometric, piezoelectric, calorimetric, and optical biosensors. These have been applied mostly in food and water analysis and pharmaceutical processes due to their demands for sensitivity, specificity, speed, and accuracy of analyte measurements. Among them, optical biosensors correlating changes in concentration, mass, or number of molecules to direct changes in characteristics of light have preferentially evolved in these past years. Optical detection using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors has been increasingly popular due to its speed of detection, high specificity, high sensitivity, and possibility of real-time analysis1.

SPR-BASED BIOSENSORS

SPR appeared as a revolutionary technology > 20 years ago, when their first commercial instrumentation, the Biacore, was launched on the market by the Swedish company Pharmacia Biosensors AB2. Since then, many researchers adopted the SPR in various analytical fields such as the food industry, pharmaceutical approaches, doping analysis, proteomics and genomics, and environmental monitoring. Beyond that, clinical and biomedical analyses have also been explored with promising results1,3.

In a typical SPR experiment, one interacting molecule, referred as the “ligand,” is bound to the biosensor surface while the other, called “analyte,” is delivered to the surface in a continuous flow through a complex microfluidic system. The biosensor consists of a glass piece coated with a layer of gold, creating a platform for a range of specialized surfaces designed to optimize the binding of a variety of molecules including inorganic compounds, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and even whole cells. The gold layer in the biosensor allows the generation of the SPR events that essentially detect changes in mass in the aqueous layer close to the biosensor surface by measuring changes in the refractive index of an incident polarized light beam (Fig. 1). The data obtained provide real-time quantitative information about binding specificity, active concentration of a molecule in a sample, kinetics, and affinity of binding models, among others. The complex theory behind SPR has been extensively detailed before4; thus, it will not be further discussed here.

Figure 1 Fundamentals of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor. SPR is a physical phenomenon that occurs when polarized light strikes an electrically conducting surface (made of gold in most cases) at the interface between two media, a high-refractive-index glass or crystal prism and a low-refractive-index buffer solution. This generates intermittent waves of electrons (charge density waves), also known as plasmons, that reduce the intensity of reflected light at a specific angle known as the resonance angle (RA), in proportion to the mass deposited on the conducting surface. These arrays, referred to as SPR sensors, are used to detect a refractive index change of the polarized light beam within a detection area (< 500 nm) as a change of the RA, when the interactions between ligand molecules (attached to the sensor) and the analytes (flowing in solution) occur. 

SPR APPROACHES FOR BIOMEDICAL AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS

SPR analyses possess a great potential for clinical and biomedical applications due to their inherent advantages when dealing with biomolecules. Optical SPR-based studies can be carried out with colored or even opaque samples, and there is no need to label molecules of interest with fluorescent or radioactive tags, thus avoiding the possibility that labels may compromise molecular activity or association features. In this way, analytes derived from clinical samples, human cells, or tissues can be studied in their native state to provide results that reflect more accurately their activity in vivo3,5.

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in research articles reporting the development of SPR techniques for biomolecular analysis; accordingly, several studies report the detection of different peptides, proteins (including antibodies), hormones, microRNA, and DNA. Consequently, multiple SPR-related reports emerged showing the analysis of clinical samples from patients suffering specific diseases, which is usually the ultimate objective of biomedical researchers looking for new diagnostic tools.

SPR approaches have been applied to clinical tests for monitoring antibodies, proteins, enzymes, drugs, small molecules, peptides, nucleic acids, and even bacterial components or viruses. Amazingly, while the molecules detected were usually at concentrations of nanomolar scales or higher, several studies reported picomolar detection or even lower concentrations. This technique has been applied in a number of biofluids including plasma, serum, whole blood, urine, stools, saliva, cervicovaginal secretion, endometrial tissue, synovial, cerebrospinal, amniotic, and ascites fluids1,3,6-9. The analytes detected by SPR in these samples represent an everyday growing list of molecules with great potential for clinical-related applications, as exemplified in the next sections and detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinically relevant analytes determined by SPR analyses. 

Disease or condition Analytes measured by SPR Sample
Antibodies

Antiphospholipid syndrome Anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I Serum
Chagas disease Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Serum
Dengue Anti-dengue virus IgM antibodies Serum
Diabetes Insulin and proinsulin autoantibodies Serum
Epstein–Barr virus infection Anti-VCA, anti-EBNA, and anti-EA, all viral antigens Serum
Hepatitis A and B Anti-hepatitis A or B antigens Serum
Leukemia Anti-asparaginase, κ and λ immunoglobulin light chain Serum
Lyme disease Anti-Borrelia spp. Serum
Neonatal thrombocytopenia Anti-HPA-1a alloantibodies Serum
Peanut allergies IgE Serum
Red cell aplasia Anti-erythropoiesis-stimulating agent IgG4 antibodies Serum
Rheumatoid arthritis Anti-glucose 6-phosphate isomerase, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies Synovial fluid and serum
Syphilis Anti-Treponema pallidum Serum
Systemic lupus erythematosus Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies Serum
Typhoid fever Anti-Salmonella enterica serotype typhi Serum

Other proteins

Alzheimer’s disease Tau protein Serum
Bladder cancer Podoplanin Serum, urine
Cancer Galectin-1 Serum
Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ Serum
Diabetes Insulin Serum
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma p53, p38αMAP kinase Serum
Heart disease C-reactive protein, BNP, MG, and cTnI Serum
Hematopoiesis CXCL12 Urine
Hepatocellular carcinoma Lipocalin-2 Serum
Lung cancer Rac Serum
Osteoarthritis TNF-α, MMP-3 Synovial fluid
Pancreatic cancer ALCAM Serum
Preeclampsia Albumin Urine
Prostate cancer PSA Serum
Rheumatoid arthritis Cathepsin G Endometrial tissue
Tuberculosis CFP-10 Urine

Other molecules

Alzheimer’s disease Amyloid-β Cerebrospinal fluid
Cancer Exosomes Ascites fluid
Cancer treatment Methotrexate Serum
Celiac disease Gluten peptides Urine
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection PCR products of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Stool
Fertility monitoring Estriol 3-sulfate 16α-glucuronide Serum
Pancreatic cancer miR-21 and miR-10b Plasma
Sport doping Human growth hormone Serum
β-thalassemia Genomic DNA Blood

Molecules used in clinical approaches, detected in human samples by SPR methods. The table was adapted from Mariani and Minunni3.PSA: prostate-specific antigen, SPR: surface plasmon resonance, IL: interleukin, Ig: immunoglobulin, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, IFN: interferon, BNP: brain natriuretic peptide, MG: myoglobin, cTnI: cardiac troponin I, PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

Protein Biomarkers

A protein biomarker is used in clinical diagnosis to monitor the status of several associated diseases, displaying a potential utility for targeted therapy and to evaluate the therapeutic responses. The implementation of proteomic approaches together with the growing number of clinical biomarkers of proteic nature is accelerating the development of reliable methods for their detection in complex clinical samples such as SPR techniques. Examples of these clinically relevant protein biomarkers include molecules related with specific diseases1,3,6-9, as explained below.

Cancer Biomarkers

An important aspect of all types of cancer management should include the monitoring of protein biomarkers related with these diseases, preferentially in easily collected physiological fluids over surgically obtained biopsies; examples of these proteins are the prostate-specific antigen, podoplanin, lipocalin 2, galectin 1, and CD166 (ALCAM), among others. Besides providing practical information to guide clinician’s decisions, cancer biomarkers are also linked to specific alterations in molecular pathways controlling cancer pathogenesis, thus evidencing their potential for deciding about therapeutic strategies8,9.

Cardiac Disease Biomarkers

Cardiac biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I are proteins released into the bloodstream on damage of the heart or associated tissues. These biomarkers help to diagnose acute coronary syndrome and cardiac tissue ischemia, both conditions associated with insufficient blood flow. Cardiac biomarker proteins can also be used to estimate an individual’s risk to develop these conditions or to help monitor and deal with a patient suspected to suffer from these conditions3.

Antibodies

Although SPR has been extensively applied for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies, both used in therapeutics or biomedical research, its utility in diagnosis by measuring antibody levels in circulation is a neglected application. However, there are reports of SPR playing a crucial role mainly in the analysis of autoantibodies in human serum for real-time monitoring of autoimmune disorders including for example anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in lupus erythematosus and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis3.

Another field where antibody detection by SPR sensors could be important is the biopharmaceutical industry. Here, the immunogenicity of biological drugs is always a concern since they are primarily proteins (monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, growth factors, hormones, enzymes, or fusion proteins) and peptides that, when administered, often could induce a drug-specific immune response characterized by the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs)10.

ADAs have been detected in clinical studies resulting in significant alterations in toxicology, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals. Consequently, regulatory authorities are now requesting immunogenicity studies that include the detection of ADAs, before the approval of any biological drug10. On this scenario, the use of SPR devices for ADAs detection represents a valuable approach due to the intrinsic and previously discussed advantages of this technology.

Hormones Measurement

The analysis of both lipidic and small peptide hormones is an important area in clinical diagnostics and, currently, in anti-doping regulations. Endocrine diseases, where these mediators are typically involved, usually require measuring hormone levels by direct or indirect methods. Accordingly, SPR has demonstrated the ability to provide sensitive solutions in this clinical area by determining, for example, estriol metabolites and human growth hormone, among other hormones3,7.

Nucleic Acid Analyses

SPR assays related with nucleic acids could be subdivided into two main classes: analyses for the detection of chromosome abnormalities including point mutations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms such as those occurring in β-thalassemia, and assays for the quantification of genetic material as biomarkers such as microRNAs3.

Pathogens Detection

Beyond the identification of pathogens through specific DNA sequences targeting, other approaches based on the detection of a number of cell pathogen components have been reported. Particularly, several bacterial and parasite components, including Salmonella spp. and Schistosoma mansoni antigens, or even whole of H1N1 influenza virus particles, have been subject to SPR analyses6.

Whole-cell SPR Analyses

The detection depth of conventional SPR sensors reaches no > 500 nm beyond the gold layer; therefore, they are useful for the detection of changes near the plasma membrane of live cells with a high sensitivity. In this way, different SPR techniques have been developed to perform real-time evaluation of exogenous stimuli-induced responses in living cells. These approaches might reflect the reorganization of proteins as a consequence of intracellular signal transduction processes.

Examples of whole-cell analyses by SPR devices include the detection of real-time adhesion and morphological changes in living cells due to the action of toxins or enzymes5. A similar approach is the SPR measurement of the apoptosis rate of cancer cells in response to different oncological drugs, which can be applied in a clinical setting to evaluate the individual therapeutic potential of different treatments including pharmacodynamic interactions5. In addition, SPR sensors could reveal real-time alterations in intracellular signaling pathways of abnormal cells such as cancer cells, making them able to detect malignant tumors5.

Finally, the recently developed SPR imaging systems and the long-range SPR sensors for living cells may allow the visualization and deep through analyses of single cell reactions, potentially expanding the application of SPR whole-cell sensing for clinical diagnosis in the near future.

CONCLUSIONS

To be implemented as a routine analytical method, SPR sensing will need to replace existing technologies. In this way, several clinical results obtained with SPR devices have been compared to those from ELISA assays, chemiluminescence approaches, polymerase chain reaction, or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, generally demonstrating similar quality8.

Since ELISA employs the same experimental design as SPR sensing, regarding the detection of analytes using direct, indirect, or sandwich assays, it is frequently the method against which SPR systems are compared. The studies show that ELISA and SPR deliver the same dynamic range of sensitivity, although the advantages of SPR reside in the label-free and rapid detection of analytes plus the possibility of reusing the same sensor many times, which could decrease the cost of serial measurements. The SPR method is also preferred for the detection of molecules with low binding affinities, which can otherwise be washed away in ELISA assays.

Although the detection of antibody and general protein markers dominates the current applications of SPR approaches that undoubtedly support medical practice, the increasingly recognized usefulness of genetic testing, microRNA detection, and special molecules’ analyses in clinical practice could represent an interesting niche for SPR applications.

In the upcoming years, novel integrated, simpler, and even portable SPR systems, capable of detecting biomolecules with high sensitivity ideally in undiluted biofluids, will be surely available to clinicians for daily use, allowing for a more accurate decision-making in the management of a given patient. For now, the promising results of this technology for the analysis of human samples in detecting biomarkers and helping with diagnostic or prognostic approaches in several diseases position SPR techniques as a powerful tool in clinical management with a great potential in precision medicine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants 240314 from CONACyT as well as IA204316 and IA202318 from UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT program. The authors thank Ari Kleinberg-Bild (RAI, UNAM) for the art work of Figure 1.

REFERENCES

1. Rich RL, Myszka DG. Advances in surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000;11:54-61. [ Links ]

2. Malmqvist M. BIACORE:an affinity biosensor system for characterization of biomolecular interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 1999;27:335-40. [ Links ]

3. Mariani S, Minunni M. Surface plasmon resonance applications in clinical analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:2303-23. [ Links ]

4. Wang DS, Fan SK. Microfluidic surface plasmon resonance sensors:from principles to point-of-care applications. Sensors (Basel). 2016;16:E1175. [ Links ]

5. Yanase Y, Hiragun T, Ishii K, et al. Surface plasmon resonance for cell-based clinical diagnosis. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:4948-59. [ Links ]

6. Bergwerff AA, van Knapen F. Surface plasmon resonance biosensors for detection of pathogenic microorganisms:strategies to secure food and environmental safety. J AOAC Int. 2006;89:826-31. [ Links ]

7. Wittenberg NJ, Wootla B, Jordan LR, et al. Applications of SPR for the characterization of molecules important in the pathogenesis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14:449-63. [ Links ]

8. Masson JF. Surface plasmon resonance clinical biosensors for medical diagnostics. ACS Sens. 2017;2:16-30. [ Links ]

9. Ferhan AR, Jackman JA, Park JH, Cho NJ, Kim DH. Nanoplasmonic sensors for detecting circulating cancer biomarkers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;125:48-77. [ Links ]

10. Gunn GR 3rd, Sealey DC, Jamali F, et al. From the bench to clinical practice:understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;184:137-46. [ Links ]

Received: August 28, 2018; Accepted: September 25, 2018

* Corresponding author: José Luis Maravillas-Montero Red de Apoyo a la Investigación Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán Vasco de Quiroga, 15 Col. Sección XVI, Del. Tlalpan C.P. 14080, Mexico City, Mexico E-mail: maravillas@cic.unam.mx

Creative Commons License Revista de Investigación Clínica. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license