SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.94 número1Polimorfismos del TLR4 en pacientes con enfermedad de Stargardt: un estudio familiar¿Es útil el filtro para luz azul de los lentes intraoculares y aéreos para mejorar la salud visual? Una revisión sistemática de la literatura índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de oftalmología

versão On-line ISSN 2604-1227versão impressa ISSN 0187-4519

Resumo

CABRERA-PEREZ, Mariana; MARTINEZ-CEBALLOS, M. Alejandra  e  CACERES-DUQUE, Natalia. Clinical and epidemiological profile of ocular emergencies in a large teaching hospital. Rev. mex. oftalmol [online]. 2020, vol.94, n.1, pp.16-22.  Epub 25-Jun-2021. ISSN 2604-1227.  https://doi.org/10.24875/rmo.m19000103.

Purpose:

The purpose of the study was to characterize emergency room (ER) ophthalmology referrals to identify the most common pathologies, the frequency of urgent and non-urgent diagnoses, and compare diagnostic accuracy between the ER physician and the ophthalmologist.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study, we included consecutive patients referred to the ophthalmology department from the ER of a large general teaching hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, from November 1, 2016, to April 30, 2017. Variables extracted from the patients’ medical records included age, sex, type of insurance, cause (traumatic vs. nontraumatic), referring physician’s diagnosis, final diagnosis, and urgency (urgent, semi-urgent, or non-urgent).

Results:

A total of 473 patients were included in this study. 52.9% of visits were for an urgent condition, 17.1% were considered semi-urgent, and 30% of the visits were not urgent. The most common diagnosis was a corneal foreign body (22.4%), often from a work-related accident. Urgent or semi-urgent visits and traumatic injuries were more frequent in males and in patients with job insurance (p < 0.01). The agreement between the diagnosis given by the ER physician and the ophthalmologist was 34.1%.

Conclusions:

A much higher prevalence of corneal foreign bodies (22.4%) was observed compared to the reported global literature, highlighting the urgent need to increase eye protection at work and home. About 30% of visits were due to non-urgent conditions, which could be decreased by teaching patients and training our nurses in triage to identify true ocular emergencies. ER physicians need more ophthalmology training evidenced by the low agreement between their diagnosis and the ophthalmologist’s diagnosis.

Palavras-chave : Emergency service; Hospital; Public health; Ophthalmology; Eye injuries; Epidemiology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )