SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 suppl.2Frecuencia de neoplasias bilio-pancreáticas en el Hospital Regional “General Ignacio Zaragoza” ISSSTE en el periodo de enero 2018 a mayo 2019 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Endoscopia

versão On-line ISSN 2444-6483versão impressa ISSN 0188-9893

Resumo

PICAZO-FERRERA, Katia et al. Factores de riesgo y tratamiento endoscópico para estenosis de anastomosis posterior a resección en pacientes con cáncer colorectal. Endoscopia [online]. 2019, vol.31, suppl.2, pp.233-239.  Epub 14-Fev-2022. ISSN 2444-6483.  https://doi.org/10.24875/end.m19000102.

Anastomotic stricture following colorectal cancer surgery is not a rare complication, but proper management of anastomotic stricture located close to the anal verge is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and management strategies for anastomotic stricture after colorectal resections in oncological patients.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study which includes data obtained from a database of patients in endoscopic surveillance of colorectal cancer who underwent surgery and anastomosis between January 2014 and January 2019. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for anastomotic stricture were investigated.

Results:

Among 213 patients included, 39 (18.3%) were diagnosed having anastomotic stricture. The analysis revealed that intersphincteric resection (odds ratio [OR] = 18.81; confidence interval 95% (CI 3.31 - 189.40, p<0.001) and diverting stoma OR = 7.07 95% (CI 3.10 - 16.57, p<0.001) were independent risk factors of anastomotic stricture. Anastomostic stapler use was found as a protective factor against stricture OR = 0.41 (CI 0.16 - 1.1, p=0.04). Twenty seven patients (69.2%) were treated by endoscopic procedures, 51% underwent baloon dilation, 22.2% incisional therapy, 18.5% were dilated with the scope and 7.4% underwent both baloon dilation and incisional therapy. Average sessions needed was 1.57 (minimum 1 y maximum 4), 83.3% resolved and 2.6% presented stricture recurrence. No complications were reported after endoscopic treatment. In conclusion, patients treated with intersphincteric resection and the presence of a diverting stoma are risk factors for anastomotic stricture after surgery. Anastomotic stapler use was found as a protective factor against stricture development. Therapeutic endoscopic options for colorectal anastomotic strictures are effective and safe, but clinicians should carefully select a conservative dilation method because actually there is no consensus about the gold standard treatment method.

Palavras-chave : Colorectal cancer; Anastomosis; Stricture; Stoma.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )