SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.89 número4¿Cuando merece la pena realizar una linfadenectomía en pacientes con micrometástasis de melanoma en ganglio centinela? Un análisis retrospectivo de 20 años de experienciaPerfusión aislada de extremidad: una opción terapéutica para metástasis en tránsito de melanoma nodular y lentiginoso acral índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cirugía y cirujanos

versión On-line ISSN 2444-054Xversión impresa ISSN 0009-7411

Resumen

MORENO, Andrey et al. Anterolateral thigh versus radial forearm flap for cervical esophageal reconstruction in cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study in Colombia. Cir. cir. [online]. 2021, vol.89, n.4, pp.461-468.  Epub 03-Nov-2021. ISSN 2444-054X.  https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.20000546.

Objective:

This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes of anterolateral thigh (ALT) and radial forearm flap in hypopharyngeal and esophageal reconstruction in a fourth level hospital in Bogotá, Colombia.

Methods:

This retrospective study included 38 patients who esophageal functional reconstruction using radial forearm or ALT flap at our center between February 2010 and December 2017.

Results:

Mean age was 51 years. About 80% of the included patients were females. Laryngoesophageal defects were present in 80%. Total circumferential reconstruction was required in 60% of patients. Brachial-radial grafts were performed in 26% and anterolateral thigh flaps in 74%. Overall, early complication rate was 30%, which 20% were fistulae (brachial-radial, 2.8%; ALT free flap, 8.3%). Late complications (20%) included stenosis and distal graft lumen obstruction. Only 10% of patients were unable to tolerate oral feeding and 50% of this patient needed permanent gastrostomy. Regarding oncological follow-up during the 24-month post-operative, no tumor recurrence was observed.

Conclusions:

Functional outcomes of reconstruction with brachial-radial and ALT flap were satisfying. Our findings suggest that ALT has a lower incidence of post-operative complications than radial forearm flap. The choice of the type of flap will depend on the size and location of the defect. Small and partially covered defects benefit from the use of a radial flap, and for larger and circumferential pharyngeal reconstructions with possible radiotherapy requirements, they benefit from an ALT flap.

Palabras llave : Esophageal; Reconstruction; Pharyngocervical.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )