SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 número81La relevancia del grupo en la dinámica institucional: Un equipo de buceo universitario índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Iztapalapa. Revista de ciencias sociales y humanidades

versión On-line ISSN 2007-9176versión impresa ISSN 0185-4259

Resumen

VAZQUEZ LEON, Luis. The historiography of anthropology as history: between its extreme plurality and orthodoxy. Iztapalapa. Rev. cienc. soc. humanid. [online]. 2016, vol.37, n.81, pp.9-38. ISSN 2007-9176.  http://dx.doi.org/10.28928/revistaiztapalapa/812016/atc1/vazquezleonl.

Anthropology very own historiography is extensive and considerable. Since 1935 it has been practiced trough history as an anthropological issue. However since the beginning, the deepest divergences surfaced interiorly and between fields. Most of the contributions were full of historical controversy, being as an evolutionary advance, then as pendulum movement, and finally as paradigmatic succession. In all cases there was a more extreme and personalized “plural” diversity. In the other hand, George Stoking Jr’s professional history procured to forge a canon that several followers took as historicist orthodox. Another turn to the screw given that the professional field remained divided a condition that far from changing it has endured. Some milieus even consider the disappearance of the so called unitary anthropology nomination. And the contribution of the presentist history continues to document the continuous divergence.

Palabras llave : Presentism; Historicism; Plurality; Orthodoxy; Canon.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )