SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.99 número3Estudio de genética de poblaciones de tres especies de bambúes leñosos nativos de Mexico del género Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Guaduinae) utilizando microsatélites nuclearesEvaluación fisiológica de malezas ruderales como biomonitores de depósito de nitrógeno atmosférico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Resumen

GUZMAN-VAZQUEZ, Itzel; CASTILLO-ARGUERO, Silvia; OROZCO-SEGOVIA, Alma  y  COLLAZO-ORTEGA, Margarita. Spatial and temporal dynamics of two cacti seed banks in a xerophytic shrubland in Mexico City. Bot. sci [online]. 2021, vol.99, n.3, pp.560-572.  Epub 25-Jun-2021. ISSN 2007-4476.  https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2745.

Background:

Soil and aerial seed banks directly affect recruitment in plant populations. Soil banks result as the balance between seed inputs and outputs. Seed bank dynamics vary by species and environmental conditions. Few records on cacti seed banks are available.

Questions:

What types of seed banks do two cacti genera form in a lava-field reserve? Does seasonality influence the seed bank dynamics? Are inputs and outputs associated to the microenvironment?

Studied species:

Opuntia tomentosa, O. lassiacantha, Mammillaria haageana subsp. san-angelensis, M. magnimamma.

Study site and dates:

Xerophytic shrubland in the “Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel” in Mexico City. 2016 to 2018.

Methods:

We collected soil samples from four microenvironments during the rainy and the dry seasons, searched for seeds and tested their viability. We compared the number of inputs, outputs and viable seed by microenvironment and season. For M. magnimamma, each month we registered fruit maturation and searched for seeds remaining between tubercles.

Results:

Opuntia seed bank inputs occurred in all microenvironments and in both seasons. Rain favored inputs in hollows by secondary seed dispersal. We registered a large number of outputs caused by germination, granivory and loss of viability. Opuntia seed bank was developed in headland, plain and slope. No Mammillaria seed inputs were found, neither an aerial bank in M. magnimamma.

Conclusion:

Opuntia seed banks were restricted to microenvironments that provided “safe sites” which stored viable seeds. Mammillaria seed dynamics may hinders recruitment for their populations.

Palabras llave : microenvironments; recruitment; “safe site”; seasonality; viability.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )