SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.79 número6Análisis bibliométrico: Hitos en medicina sexual, terapéuticas de la disfunción eréctil en el tiempoEficacia del manejo de la litiasis renal con litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) en la población pediátrica de un hospital de tercer nivel en México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de urología

versão On-line ISSN 2007-4085versão impressa ISSN 0185-4542

Resumo

MURUATO-ARAIZA, Jesús Sebastián et al. Double-J catheter management after ureteroscopy: symptoms and complications. Rev. mex. urol. [online]. 2019, vol.79, n.6, e03.  Epub 24-Nov-2020. ISSN 2007-4085.

Background:

Currently, a double-J catheter is placed in 70% of patients that undergo ureteroscopy because it is believed to decrease obstruction secondary to ureteral edema or stone fragments. However, catheter placement is not innocuous, given that it can result in a variety of side effects, such as urinary frequency, urgency, hematuria, dysuria, and tenesmus, as well as increase costs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current double-J catheter management in patients after ureteroscopy and the associated postoperative symptoms.

Materials and methods:

A retrospective study analyzing ureteroscopies performed at the Hospital Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez throughout 2017 on patients above 18 years of age was conducted. Urology service re-admission frequency during the first postoperative week, the symptoms associated with double-J catheter use, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results:

A total of 105 ureteroscopies were registered. Male sex was predominant (55%) and semirigid ureteroscopies were the most prevalent procedures (71%). A double-J catheter was preoperatively placed in 69 patients and postoperatively placed in 41 patients. During follow-up, the patients with double-J catheter placement presented with associated symptoms warranting an emergency room visit. Pollakiuria was the only significant association found (p=0.001). Ninety-five patients were stone-free, 61 (64.2%) of whom had double-J catheter placement. Two patients with no catheter presented with residual stones.

Conclusions:

Of the 61 patients with double-J catheter, 57 (82%) presented with at least one symptom related to catheter placement. A total of 64.2% patients with a double-J catheter had uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to conduct a randomized, prospective study with a larger number of patients to confirm the previously reported results and more clearly and objectively establish the indications for double-J catheter use at our hospital.

Palavras-chave : Lithiasis; Double-J catheter; Ureteroscopy.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )