SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número21El hombre como “el animal enfermo”: sobre el significado de salud y enfermedad en la antropología crítica de NietzscheEl problema del hombre en la fenomenología de Husserl índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Valenciana

versión impresa ISSN 2007-2538

Resumen

FERREYRA, Julián. Fichte or Deleuze, who is the dogmatic?. Valenciana [online]. 2018, vol.11, n.21, pp.257-288. ISSN 2007-2538.  https://doi.org/10.15174/rv.v0i21.326.

Fichte and Deleuze question each other as they characterize -each in his own fashion - the dogmatism as the enemy of the authentic philosophical thinking. In this paper, we will reconstruct and compare such characterizations in order to examine both ontologies and consider the munder a new light. In Deleuze, we will study how the I -all of whose dimensions are placed in the empirical field- can affirm something in a non-dogmatic way about the fields that are its transcendental condition: the intensive and the virtual. In Fichte, we will reject the interpretation of the famous sentence I = I as a form of identity, in order to understand it as an immanence that produces eternally the multiplicity of the real.

Palabras llave : Dogmatism; Deleuze; Fichte; Immanence; I=I.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )